Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
The Dodgers circulated this transcript of Dodger manager Grady Little's meeting with the media at the Winter Meetings.
Q. Where you've been, Grady?
GL: We had a late lunch.
Q. Anything on the signing of Jason Schmidt, what it means to the ballclub and how big a deal that is to your rotation?
GL: I just came from a meeting with Ned Colletti upstairs and there is not a deal with Jason Schmidt yet.
Q. There isn't any?
GL: No.
Q. What is lacking in there being a deal? Is it just a physical or more?
GL: Let him know.
Q. What does it mean to have somebody like that considering he averages over 200 innings every year and a good anchor to almost any pitching staff?
GL: He's a good pitcher. But there is no deal out.
Q. Could you comment on both Julio Lugo and J.D. Drew and how you think they will fit in with Boston?
GL: Yeah, I think that the year that J.D. Drew had last year in L.A. speaks for itself. It was an outstanding year that he had there for us. He's a very talented player. He's got the ability to hit the ball out of the park. He plays good defense. He runs well. He is a good person.
Julio Lugo played very well for us when he first joined our club last year. He was put into a situation where he arrived on the scene at the time when Nomar Garciaparra and Jeff Kent were both placed on the DL. He played every day for us for two weeks or so, was a very good player for us during that time and then was placed in a situation when they came back off the DL where he didn't play every day and that was totally out of position for Julio, and it in a way was unfair for him, but that's the way the situation was on our ballclub at that time. And it's unfair for me to sit here and judge his play from that point on because he had never been a part time player before in his career.
Q. Do you find him to be a very good shortstop, everyday shortstop?
GL: He is a very talented player. I think he showed that when he played every day at Tampa Bay. He plays with a lot of excitement. He can make a lot of things happen and with that porch in left field in Fenway, I'm sure he will hit a few balls over that thing.
Q. You are obviously very aware of the high pressure environment of the Red Sox.
GL: No, I'm not aware of that.
Q. Do you think they will react well to that? How do you think they will handle that?
GL: They are just like fans everywhere else, they want to win the games and they need players to perform, be productive to do that and their reaction will be based on that.
Q. Are you starting to lose hope on acquiring Manny Ramirez?
GL: Lose hope? You know, that conversation takes place every winter, doesn't it, around these meetings. I think it is usually the topic of conversation and what makes you think this one is any different?
Q. Grady, you were reuniting with some of your players, the Dodgers with Nomar and Derek Lowe, what if you are reunited with Manny and obviously this is "what if" speculation kind of situation.
GL: Manny's a good player. Manny's a good player and I like to be surrounded by good players. It takes those to make me look good. But Nomar, these kind of guys are good players and we like to surround ourselves with as many players like that as we can.
Q. You got Lieberthal today. Do you see him catching with the confidence last year and how many starts can you get out of him?
GL: I think if he catches as much as last year something before September gets here but he's gonna need a little bit more time off than I gave him last year and I talked to Mike, he knows the situation that we're in there in L.A. He knows what we think about Russell Martin and he is ready to do whatever we need him to do, whether it's catch one day a week, one day over ten days, whatever it is. But Mike Lieberthal is a local kid, a local man there from L.A. and we are glad to have him on the club.
Q. What kind of bounce back do you think that Eric Gagne could have for whatever team he pitches for this year?
GL: Eric Gagne has had an outstanding career there in L.A. and that's all speculation whatever I said about what I thought could bounce back and go would just be speculation. He's gone through some difficult injury situations lately but he is out there ready to go right now.
Q. Are you sort of going forward with plans right now that he is not going to be with the club?
GL: At this point in time, he is a free agent and we're talking to a lot of free agents and about a lot of free agents.
Q. Can you afford to go into next season with two outfielders? Do you need to add someone?
GL: We like our players. We like our team. And any way that we can figure out that we could do something to make it better we will do it but I like our players, I like the team that we have right now as we speak. Anything we can do to help it, we will.
Q. Who would start in left and right, right now, if these are your options?
GL: We're not playing today.
Q. No, but soon.
GL: Well, I tell you what, we went into the playoffs last year with seven rookies on a 25 man roster and we played Marlon Anderson in left field every day. Still have him on our team. Still have Andre there. We have got a little fellow we just signed to play center field, which he is going to be in there for a lot of games as far as this year. We like our ballclub.
Who is going to play left field? Still haven't answered your question.
Q. Or right field. Do you have an answer to either one?
GL: I can't tell you that. I can't tell you that.
Q. Were you able to forge a pretty good relationship with Gagne last year considering he was hurt and missed most of the entire year?
GL: You know, throughout the course of the season, it's hard to forge much of a relationship with a player when he's not playing and he was trying to get himself back ready to pitch last year. We thought we had him to that point at one time and then it didn't happen, but through the course of the season, it's hard to have very much time to forge any kind of relationships like that. You've got your hands full with 25 active players.
Q. What are you going to do with your leadoff man?
GL: You know, we'll try some things in spring training, we have some ideas going into spring training with the Juan and Rafael Furcal, but I can't sit here and tell you right now how we will end up on opening day. It could be one way, we will try some things and if something's not working, we'll change it. If it's working, we'll leave it the same, but we got the luxury of two big leadoff hitters there and whatever we do, I'm sure both guys will be hitting in the first inning. In what order, I don't know.
Q. Not necessarily 1 2?
GL: Not necessarily.
Q. I know you said you had not reached a deal yet with Schmidt but you played against him last year in the same division. What kind of skills make him such a dominant pitcher?
GL: Well, it seemed like every time we picked up the paper and saw that he was going to be pitching in our series, it wasn't really a pitcher we were looking forward to facing. You know that when you took the field against a guy like that, that he's going to be out there for a long time and you go into it in the frame of mind you want to try to keep the games close until he gets tired, try to get the next guy.
Q. Those are the kind of qualities you'd want in one of your own pitchers?
GL: The situation we were in last year in L.A., we liked starting pitchers any time they went beyond the fifth inning.
Q. Excited about the young guys you've got coming up, the Loneys, Kemp, Billingsleys, guys like that just on the cusp of something good?
GL: I think that goes without saying. We've got some good young players over there, right there a couple of them have an opportunity last year, some due to injuries, some for other reasons, when they got the opportunity, they made the best of it, and I think they showed the world that all everything we've been hearing about them is true.
These guys are close to being really good players in the major leagues for a long time.
Q. Anybody you saw that you particularly liked, just liked the way they played or liked something about them, those young guys?
GL: I like them all, I like them all and I think that the way we utilized them throughout the course of the season showed that.
Q. You had a new contract with Saito and are you happy to have him back to the Dodgers?
GL: I would say so. You know, he got an opportunity last year to come in. He joined our club I think in May and I don't know the exact numbers but I do know the exact number of saves that he had he blew a save and that was one out of all of his opportunities. He has good control. He has good stuff and we're certainly glad he's back.
But I still haven't been able to figure out why I see the catcher go to the mound or my pitching coach go to the mound or I go to the mound and he puts his glove over his mouth so no one can read his lips. I haven't really figured out why he does that yet. I think he's been watching too much TV.
Q. Do you think Broxton's got the potential to be a closer too, that he can fulfill that role someday?
GL: I think he certainly could. He certainly has the stuff and the makeup and the resiliency that it takes to be a good closer. Going into the season this year, we expect to use him in the same role we used him in last year, with the comfort of knowing that if something happened to Saito, we'll have him to fall back on and that's not that bad.
Q. Disappointed about Maddux going down the coast?
GL: Yeah, but that guy means so much to a ballclub, anyone would certainly love to have him on their staff. But I know they're proud they got him down there. He means a lot to everyone else in the clubhouse and not just what he does on the field that accounts around there. He meant a lot to our club last year and this year probably about six different series, he meant a lot to our club again when we face him.
Q. You are on a team that has the resources to participate in a pretty free market. Do you have worries about what happens when you sign a guy to a big contract, you overpay him and maybe he doesn't work out or do what you expect him, what kind of effect that has on your club?
GL: I think any time that a manager has some players that aren't performing up to their capability that they are underachieving, maybe some times you better start looking in the mirror because he might not be out there worrying about it that long but those thing does happen. You deal with them the best that you can and try to keep them from happening.
Q. Does it get more complicated when, you know, big money's at stake also?
GL: We never think about money, when your in that clubhouse and on that field, you're trying to win games and age and money is never a factor, in my eyes.
Q. It might be among the players, you know, like if you're a guy who's making a tenth of what somebody else is and, you know, feel like your skills are superior, your production is superior, that seems like that's where it could become a problem.
GL: If that is something that creates friction within a clubhouse, then you've got the wrong players.
Q. You talk to Joe Beimel?
GL: Yes I have.
Q. (Inaudible)?
GL: He meant a lot to our club last year, an unfortunate circumstance that he got into there going into the playoffs but and it's something I think he learned a lot from. It is unfortunate but we are looking forward to having him back on our club.
Q. Who's your opening day starters?
GL: Call me.
Q. Back to Beimel for a minute you say you've talked to him and Ned's talked to him, there's some comments made during the playoffs, how sure are you that that's not going to be an issue inside that room?
GL: We'll deal with that, if there's something that needs to be dealt with, we don't shy away from anything like that we will face it.
Q. Can you talk about the addition of Mike Lieberthal, a veteran, and what he provides the team.
GL: Mike, we have a lot of respect for what Mike could bring to our ballclub. He's been around for a long time. He's been a very productive player and for the role he will take on our ballclub, we think he's perfect. We look forward to having him. I've talked to him a couple of times. He is excited about being there in that role at this point in his career and we are certainly glad to have him.
FastScripts by www.ASAPSports.com
Man, I love Grady.
You know I don't understand the lack of love for Either and Betemit. I think both of those guys have a chance to turn in to really good players (maybe not great like Cabrera or Howard, but really good nonetheless and we have 'em cheap.)
Also, the thing about Schmidt and Maddux and maybe even ditching Penny is that, it does make sense (to me) to jettison pitchers than can only go 5-6 innings and pick up ones that can go 7-8-9. Can Kuo go 8? I think so. Same with Billingsley.
Anyway, I think I've spent more time reading DT than working today....
It's like having Knute Rockne, except, you know, not.
Grady is hilarious.
He likes places that are not where he is presently located.
Classic.
I agree with you about Betimet and Either, but while everyone talks about players being cheap and how important it is, I think more and more it is not that important for the Dodgers right now. They want to get good players for now, so if the Dodgers can get a definite upgrade at 3rd or perhaps in left, they will do it and as long as not too many prospects are dealt they will be fine with it. I wish there was a way to bring Gagne back, but can't see that happening.
Thanks, Jack Handy.
GL: No, I'm not aware of that.
Q. Who would start in left and right, right now, if these are your options?
GL: We're not playing today.
lol, Grady is hilarious
Honestly, I dont see us adding another 10-20mil for manny or....bonds.
Colletti wouldn't characterize whether an agreement with Pierre was close.
"It's either done or it's not done and right now it's not done," Colletti said.
On the Schmidt deal:
Colletti -- who generally does not confirm a deal until physical exams are completed -- did not confirm this one, nor did he shoot it down.
"We're not there yet," said Colletti. "We've exchanged offers. We're still talking it through. We're just not there yet. I don't want to jeopardize the situation. I don't have a deal."
so basically what you are insinuating is that Schmidt is a dodger?
"The Dodgers got themselves a good starting pitcher," Cubs manager Lou Piniella said on Wednesday. "You know, you have to pay for good talent. Jason's had a great career."
Good point. I just wish Pierre wasn't, you know, very average.
You're still fired, by the way.
No George Takei jokes, please.
Fascist.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=260606126
{Waiting for Xeifrank to drop the hammer}
Is there something you'd like to share with us, Andrew? We're here for you...
What else is on that list...?
Blue Planet: Seas of Life on the Animal Channel (best ocean documentary EVER).
You could also check out My Boys on TBS. New show about a female sportswriter and her guy friends. Hilarity ensues.
All times 8:00 PST.
Will do.
I do not approve of that video or their chants.
Not as many zombies as 28 Days Later. Still good though.
Total MLB revenues in 2005 = $4.733bn
Average team revenue in 2005 = $157.7MM
Dodgers team revenue in 2005 was approximately 1.2x the average (189MM)
Dodgers opening day payroll in 2006 = $98MM
Percentage of revenues earmarked for payroll = 52%
Total MLB revenues in 2006 = $5.2bn
Average team revenue in 2006 = $173.3MM
Extrapolated Dodgers revenue in 2006 based on multiplier of 1.2x average = $208MM
Therefore, Colletti's projected opening day payroll budget should be 52% of $208MM, or approximately $108MM. This is close to what the Dodgers are at now (assuming the Schmidt signing), so I don't expect any further deals.
However, the Dodgers had an operating profit of over $13MM in 2005. Assuming a similarly proportional profit in 2006, Colletti might have authorization to reinvest some of that into player payroll (say another 8MM), meaning that Colletti might be able to go up to $118MM, and that the Dodgers could conceivably take on Ramirez's (or another slugger's) salary if they unloaded Penny (who by the way has a limited no-trade clause, so that would be complicated).
Alternatively, the team could decide to spend a larger percentage of revenues on player payroll. In 2005, non-payroll overhead (revenues - payroll) was $77MM. If the team was able to keep these costs fairly level in 2006 (say at $85MM allowing for inflation), but not reinvest profits into payroll it would be able to spend about $116MM.
If the team reinvested its profits into payroll and maintained its non-payroll overhead at $85MM, it could conceivably spend as much as $123MM on the opening day payroll.
Looking at this financial picture, it appears a Manny deal, assuming the Schmidt deal is for real, is not in the cards. Even a Burrell deal is a longshot as he makes as much as Manny.
"You know what that means: Lilly's going to have Tommy John this year."
Apparently, they still think one word, two syllable names are the way to go these days.
Slipknot
Upshot
Wizzbang
Footstool
Booktale
Shoeneck
You know. All those rock bands these day.
Now, if they happened to land Manny Ramirez, that would catapult them into the ranks of the well above average. It wouldn't solve all their problems, but he would provide a scary stick, something they don't have now. It would also identify the Dodgers as an organization with moxie that is willing to take a risk in order to return to prominence.
And it would be a risk. The Red Sox reportedly asked for the Dodgers' top three prospects which may include Kemp and closer Jonathan Broxton -- and the Dodgers balked. But really, prospects are prospects. You can always grow more, and the Dodgers are traditionally an organization that does better than most at producing bountiful harvests on the farm.
Alas, it seems the Dodgers are playing poker with every intention of folding whenever the stakes are raised. It does not seem likely that Manny will ever put on a Dodgers uniform. There are few other options to fortify the lineup, especially none with the marquee value of Manny.
Since Frank McCourt bought the team in January 2004, there has been little indication that the franchise is determined to win a World Series. Instead, it keeps treading water in an effort to remain competitive. That's fine for other franchises in smaller markets. But the Dodgers have a legacy to live up to and well over three million paying customers each season to appease.
But Celizic does have a very cool hat. Noir kind of look to it. Very Jake Gittes.
So don't blame the McCourts. Blame Fox.
I blame Fox for everything
We should add some more players that Tracy likes such as Saenz, Werth, and Robles.
But no doubt his Depo connection and his little tantrum last year make him expendable in Ned's eyes.
http://bucsdugout.com/story/2006/12/6/213931/183
Penny, Ethier, and cash for Crawford, anyone?
Book it.
No money changes hands
But I doubt Colletti looks that far ahead.
While the Rays are reportedly open to moving Rocco Baldelli, they will not trade Carl Crawford, according to MLB.com.
After reading a rumor that Crawford was up for grabs, the Brewers called the Rays to check on his availability. Rays officials told the Brewers, "Absolutely not."
I am down.
Well so much for that.
Penny for Baldelli straight up?
The Reds would have 3 respectable starters. They'd be besides themselves.
The Devil Rays are always willing to talk to Ned...
Better not be for Burrell. Maybe Aaron Rowand?
Top of the lineup:
Pierre - 58 SB, 20 CS, 74%
Furcal - 37 SB, 13 CS, 74%
Crawford - 58 SB, 9 CS, 87%
Total: 153 SB, 42 CS, 78.5%
"The Phillies and White Sox have pulled off a deal: Freddy Garcia to Philly for Gio Gonzalez and Gavin Floyd."
http://tinyurl.com/yghqsx
LOL
I agree. this trade is kind of bleh from a white sox perspective.
Who wouldn't want to add 98 BB, 29 hr, and a .388 obp to their lineup?
So each PA ends with one of three true outcomes: home run, walk, strikeout.
It's a math thing, I think.
We're pretty close. I nearly went to 85 wins, your number, in my projections.
It won't happen, but I'd love to see the Dodgers go with what they have. My lineup would be:
Pierre
Martin
Furcal
Kent
Betemit
Nomar
Ethier
Loney (LF)
On other days, I would bat Furcal first and Pierrez eighth, with Loney moving into the No. 2 spot.
Not a lot of power in that lineup, but good left-right balance, some speed up top. The pitching projects nicely. If Bills or Kuo had to start in Triple-A, no great setback for either guy. If you can pitch, you'll get a shot. Someone wil get hurt or another club would be willing to overpay for pitching during the season.
Anderson and maybe Repko or, miracle of miracles, Werth, could spell Loney in LF getting Loney more time at 1B to spell Nomar.
LaRoche and Kemp could start the year in Triple-A. Probably would be good for both of them. LaRoche is coming off two shoulder injuries plus surgery, right? And Kemp still has some things to sort out. If they were ready in June, Kemp goes to right and Ethier goes to left. Loney could still get his ABs at 1B, two corner OF spots and as a PH.
Given the state of the NL West, plus the Dodgers' pitching depth and the potential of so many of their young players, it seems to me the Dodgers have a lot of leverage. Whether they act like it is another question. I fear that they will get panicky in their search for a power bat.
Three "true" outcomes.
Other parts of the Homeric lexicon:
D'oh!
Television is a boy's best friend. It gives so much and expects so little in return!
Oh, why did this have to happen during prime time when TV's biggest stars come out to shine?
I agree. I think Wolf will be pretty good, too.
98% of all redheads are unattractive. But that 2%, man oh man, what an absolute collection of knockouts.
It's either bad or totally awesome. Two. True. Outcomes.
Detroit is seeking a young catcher to back up Ivan Rodriguez or a left-handed setup man.
http://tinyurl.com/yc79de
Beimel or Hendrickson and Hall (30 is young, just ask Brian Sabean).
All the conversing about trading Penny and no one's saying how Theo needs a reliever but can't get one via trade... His five starters could turn to four quickly by picking up the phone and asking Papelbon to give it another year as closer. Bing. Penny, Loney for Manny...payroll relief for Matsusaka..Loney for Youkilis at 3b this year or next with Lowell a FA at year end. Wily Mo Pena in LF.
Problem solved, deal done.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.