Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
2006 ERA, Brad Penny: 4.33
2005 ERA, Brad Penny: 3.90
2006 ERA+, Brad Penny: 106 (100 is average, higher is better)
2005 ERA+, Brad Penny: 104
According to Baseball-Reference.com, Penny had a better season in ERA in 2006 than in 2005, even though his ERA was higher.
He did have higher walks+hits/innings pitched in 2006 - 1.376 vs. 1.289. And on The Hardball Times, Penny's ERA+ declined slightly in 2006, and his fielding-independent ERA worsened.
On the other hand, even with his second-half slump, Penny's strikeout ratio improved in 2006, and his home-run rate remained constant.
The small point I'm trying to make is that even when ERA goes up year-to-year, it doesn't always mean a pitcher had a poorer season. So many other factors are in play.
That leaves the larger question of whether with an offseason of rest, Penny can approach his first-half 2006 form. I don't expect him to match it for all of 2007, but at age 28, I think he can have an overall season that's an improvement over 2006. Something to consider when evaluating the Dodger pitching staff (or, if you prefer, what Penny is worth in trade.)
I probably sound like a broken record, but I think making sure the guy doesn't pitch hurt is critical to this. Let's take maturity over macho.
* * *
Nice feature on Ross Porter by Fred Fehr of the Shawnee News-Star. Next week, Porter will receive the Bill Teegins Excellence in Sports Broadcasting Award.
As a Shawnee High School sophomore in 1953, Porter began dabbling in sports broadcasting. Fred Davis, KGFF radio sports announcer, began inviting his youthful Chapman Street neighbor to baseball games involving the minor league Shawnee Hawks.
"He did the game, and I would sit in the booth," Porter said. "He asked me once if I wanted to broadcast half an inning. I ended up doing that several times that summer."
This was no whimsical flight of fancy for Porter, who at the tender age of 8, told his mother, Elizabeth, that he wanted to be a sports announcer. Elizabeth had envisioned a stockbroker.
There was a natural base for the allure of broadcasting. Ross Porter Sr. created KGFF in 1930 and launched the Oklahoma Radio Network.
"My father broadcast the 1932 Shawnee football games. That was the team that went undefeated and unscored on," Porter said. "He also courted my mom by singing on KGFF." ...
The article goes on to describe such memories as when Porter got to meet Jim Thorpe.
If some of those good first half outings were sprinkled throughout the 2nd half, then I think that we would have a much higher opinion of his worth.
I think Penny is one of those guys that pitches worse than his stuff. According to Bill James, he had the highest average veloctiy on his fastball last year (~93-94mph) and his curve looks good. Despite ace-type stuff and better than average command, his upper limit in IP is 200 and his ERA's are "only" around 4.00 while throwing in friendly pitchers parks.
IMO, Penny's a solid front-line starter, or put in other words a 2-3 type - a relative bargain salary-wise. I like Lowe more, though, because he'll give you 215+ innings with roughly similar ERA's. Also, Penny seems to always deal with some injury every year while Lowe never gets injured (knock on wood). If Colletti feels like he can move some of the starting pitching depth (presumably because both Billingsley and Kuo are deserving of a rotation spot), I'd rather they trade Penny over the other veterans.
No, I pretty much said the same thing in the last two paragraphs of my post. I think it's a common enough belief.
1-15 .788
16-30 .849
31-45 .686
46-60 .830
61-75 .768
76-90 .650
91-105 .725
106-120 .810
Penny actually struggled more at the start of games than at the end.
Funny, my similar memory is when Olberman revealed his ESPN t-shirt when he left channel 2.. Channel 2 right?
Gil Stratten was OK as well on CBS.
Does Penny have a tendency to pitch well in the first half, and then poorly in the second half, perhaps related to a tendency to get injured?
After the Dodgers swept Houston in the final three games of the year a few years back to tie Houston and force a one game playoff, LaSorda pitched Goltz instead of the rookie Valenzuela to my chagrin.
Why can't people resist making the decision they can most defend if things go wrong?
Here is to Penny getting off to a great start and then trading him for someone that I personally want to join the Dodgers.
I don't know when this started (might have been Jerry Rice), but it is officially the lamest thing in sports.
Valenzuela had pitched two innings on Sunday and two innings on Friday. He ended up pitching two innings in the Monday playoff.
There was also the small matter of the Dodgers just getting six singles off of Joe Niekro.
Valenzuela was the fifth pitcher used in the playoff. It went Goltz, Sutcliffe, Beckwith, and then Castillo.
Howe pitched the last two innings.
Actually, I think Roger Craig (the 49er) was one of the first players to do the "retire as a (insert team name)". It's been around for a while. A lot of the 49ers of that era did that.
This brings us to Penny--he has great stuff, is young and physical; on the other hand his second half combined with his year long high pitch counts conviced me that he might be done over gone.
My point is that the D's are in the catbird seat. Despite the trading of JtD, Rugg, and various others for about nothing,they don't have to DO anything, and should only make a trade that seems ridiculously in their favor. There will be desparados around and I hope they don't pick Col's pocket. The D's should only trade for a "great player". They have potentially good players.
...?!!
Nothing to report. Ms. Selin has declined to reply to my email. You've made a powerful enemy ma'am. I may have to take this all the way to school site counsel meeting! Or a bake sale, or something. Even if I have to go so far as to forget about it, entirely--mark my words: I will have satisfaction.
vr, Xei
http://www.prh.noaa.gov/pr/ptwc/latest
vr, Xei
Off topic: here's a maturity test, use the site google bar and search for "retarded." If you're not laughing hysterically by the time you hit the taunt, "Are you joking, retarded, or Kevin Malone?" you win. I didn't win.
HSP: Brilliant sets, Paul Newman, Tim Robbins, Jennifer Jason Lee, Charles Durning, noir feel, absurdist humor.
Not even close. Hudsucker Proxy > Fargo
Hud is beyond your silly taunts.
With Paul Newman, Melvyn Douglas, and Patricia Neal?
vr, Xei
I know you don't like it, and I appreciate your position. Just let it go. Please.
Again, you're one of my favorite DT posters.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
If you check the DT archives, you'll see where the notion of Valenzuela being available instead of Goltz is a myth. He had already worked too much in relief.
I would have started Valenzuela and let him go as far as he could go. I am not trying to call him a Sandy Koufax but when it was Drysdale's turn to pitch the final game of a world series, Sandy pitched instead on two days rest, pitched a complete game as I remember, and won.
Sandy over Drysdale, Valenzuela over Goltz.
And, the decision to pitch Goltz may have foolishly started when Valenzuela was asked to pitch in relief on Sunday.
And the Dodgers wouldn't have had a Monday if they didn't win on Sunday.
My point that I would have loved to have made was that there was a rookie pitcher that was pitching much better than the veteran but it was the latter that got to start the playoff game because the manager more than anything else went with the most defensible decision.
Starting Valenzuela (Billingsley) would have been like running a statue of liberty play to win a bowl game and we all know how pleasing that turned out to be.
But if you would prefer to run White off tackle instead of letting Bush try to pick up a first down, I respect your choice. It probably was as a good of choice as was starting Goltz. It just didn't turn out well.
Of course, in retrospect, Valenzuela seems like the ideal choice. But I think using him and seeing how long he could go when he had pitched so much over the weekend would have been flat-out irresponsible.
Lasorda didn't need any encouragement to burn out an arm. We may be very lucky that he didn't see a reason to in '80.
I was trying to say that Lasorda's and Grady's decision lacked an entrepreneureal spirit ala a statue of liberty play. I haven't found the insult to you yet but I am still looking.
You were merely saying to me as I interpreted your post that my idea of starting Valenzuela over Goltz may have ingored the fact that Valenzuela did not have sufficient rest. You were right.
You were supporting Lasorda's decision to start Goltz and I will admit that was probably the best choice, like running White off tackle, I just would have preferred a riskier choice in both cases.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.