Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Latka Gravas intently studies Playboy magazine, and he turns into Vic Ferrari. Now that's a transformation worth talking about.
Brett Tomko tinkering with his windup, or the annual Maury Wills tutorial of the baserunner/bunter who could use more help in every other area - that's about as exciting as teaching Latka how to be a better mechanic.
The Dodgers' most famous March tutors are Wills and Sandy Koufax. All adequate and good, but where's the legend who will wring a little more power out of this team? That's the classic I want to see over and over again.
But I'd contend that "teaching" power isn't impossible. It's just drastic.
Get with the times, Marty.
http://tinyurl.com/32lja
..."A split-finger changeup Penny developed last spring gave him a devastating third pitch to go with his 96 mph fastball and sharp curve. But he stopped using the splitter at mid-season because he was afraid it might lead to arm problems.
"It's hard on the arm and I shied away from it," he said. "Then I had trouble with my curve for a while, so I was out there throwing one pitch. It's tough to get by just with your fastball."
Somewhere I saw that Penny threw more fastballs 95 or better than any other NL pitcher last year. But, as the cliche goes, it doesn't matter how hard you can throw it; these guys can hit it.
Earth to Brad: why not go back to the splitter and maybe get some tips on how not to hurt your arm throwing it? And more help on the curve? Don't the Dodgers have a pitching coach?
Dropping the split-finger alone could account for much of the daylight/dark difference in Penny over the two halves last season.
Finally, an explanation. Though not a very encouraging one...
I am looking forward to next week's haughty "what does this have to do with sports please cancel my subscription at once" letters, however.
The article also notes that he reported to Nationals' camp today wearing a Sanford and Son t-shirt.
http://tinyurl.com/36cvjy
Along with a few sweaters...?
Filth Flarn Filth...
But he lacks leadership, charisma, veteran presence, blah blah blah...
On the other hand, Jeff Suppan is getting $10 million a year.
Whatever Rodriguez gets, he'll deserve it.
A-Rod will opt out because he knows Derek Jeter doesn't like him. Such emotional pain can ruin a man.
I once cried nonstop for a week when I found out that Tom Prince called me a "weenie."
All he needs to do is "want to be a Dodger."
A-Rod may not opt out, but he's dumb if he doesn't.
Fortunately, I'll never be faced with such a difficult decision
Can you resync the Treo to another computer? Do you have another computer with you (i.e., a laptop)?
Soft resets are a kind of general purpose reset, like rebooting a pc. This turns your device off, clears out anything that might be hung, and starts it up again. It is a soft reset you experience when your Treo suddenly turns itself off and automatically restarts. Some applications cause a soft reset after installation. Some just restart, and some let you know they will need to restart, please tap the button.
A soft reset can be performed by simply removing the back cover and letting the battery lose contact for a moment. If this fails to reset your Treo 650, you can poke a paperclip into the reset hole found under the battery. Several utilities also offer a soft reset feature from the software including ZLauncher and Initiate.
Warm Reset
A warm reset is used when something is causing your Treo to act funny. You can sometimes use it to avoid That Endless Loop Thingie ("TELT"). A warm reset is like going into Safe Mode on your pc.
To perform a warm reset, initiate a reset (via software, or removing the back cover), and hold the up arrow on the 5-way navigation pad as the Treo turns back on. (Note that on the 650 and other NVFS devices, YOU MUST HOLD THE UP BUTTON PRIOR TO INITIATING THE RESET). Hold the up button the entire time until the main Phone screen is displayed. At this point you can check the 377 error log and remove the software causing you problems if you know what it is.
NOTE: When using Treo following a warm reset, the home key and built-in launcher might be inaccessible. Therefore, you may need the use of an uninstallation app, an alternative launcher and/or file management tool to delete the problematic file.
Hard Reset
When all else fails!!! A hard reset will erase everything you have on your Treo (excluding what's on the ROM, or what you have on your SD card). Do this only as a last resort and ensure that you have BACKED UP your data beforehand.
To perform a hard reset, start your reset in any of the ways mentioned above. This time, press and hold down the red phone button until the Palm screen appears. When the Palm screen appears, let go of the red phone button. You will then be prompted (in many languages) to press up to erase all data, or down to abort. You will want to press the UP to complete the Hard Reset. Your Phone will reboot and start up with the Language Selection.
"There will be no communications for two minutes. Then we'll know ..."
I heard about a guy named Sylar who was handy with watches, but he's based in New York.
God bless the Internet, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems!
A Treo is a PDA/cellphone that is Windows based.
If they're still open, I can't recommend them enough.
No man is a failure who has friends online
Now I'm really excited! And I don't even know what a "PDA" is!
I'm back in business, baby!
Personal Data Assistant
Oh, I guess I still call those "secretaries," just like I catch myself saying "stewardess" instead of "flight attendant"
Did he have his head sliced open and the brain removed?
It's a shame, because it was one of the great jewelers/repair/small businesses in town.
The watch has a great story that nobody would care about.
In a religious compound on the outskirts of Des Moines...?
He was also a mailman, where our story takes place...
I have a Treo 650 I swear by. It is Palm-based, and syncs with my Mac G5.
Thanks for the clarification.
http://tinyurl.com/39du6b
A few gems:
Pierre has led the league in times caught stealing four years in a row, so there is room for improvement
Wait, they keep track of failed stolen base attempts? Does Ned Colletti know this?
Wills is encouraging Pierre to steal third base more often
The problem with stealing third is that it requires getting to second
"With the Cubs last year, he was by himself as a base stealer," Wills said. "They play in a small park and like to wait for home runs. So there was more pressure on him to make it every time. He'll be more relaxed at Dodger Stadium."
I guess he'll run faster without that pressure
Pierre is a proficient bunter, accumulating 135 bunt hits since 2001, 50 more than any other major leaguer
Pay that man $44 million...!
"He does the little things well," Wills said. "He knows that you have to bunt the ball before you start running. So many guys are moving before they make contact. And he knows to bunt only pitches he can handle, even if they are a little off the plate."
Um, anyone know the best way to clean vomit off a laptop...?
"I'd be willing to bet [Pierre] bats leadoff," he said. "He's a natural leadoff hitter."
I got nothing
Nice article about Mike Lieberthal in the Phila paper today (let me know if the link works):
"We needed a veteran catcher who can still catch and still play. And understand that Russell Martin is the No. 1 catcher, but also understand that on any given day, Mike Lieberthal could be the No. 1 catcher," Dodgers general manager Ned Colletti said. "One foul tip later, one collision later, Mike Lieberthal's the No. 1 catcher.
http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/baseball/16731586.htm
I love the FJM guys, but making fun of Juan Pierre is like making fun of kids with Muscular Dystrophy. Sure, it's easy, and in some sick part of your soul it may be fun, but it's not challenging.
If we're being honest, we all hope the 44 million dollar man tears his ACL and MCL, and roots for the team from the dugout. He's terrible, the contract is terrible, and Ned is a joke for signing him.
At the very least, anybody named Ja(y)son
Am I right? Right? Who's with me?
[crickets]
[chirp]
Shame on me.
I have gone years, decades, without twisting my ankle by stepping in a hole in my front lawn. And how many people have separated their shoulder by slipping on ice or was he actually washing his truck but didn't want to admit it.
Wasn't it Bobby Gritch of the Angels that hurt his back doing some repairs on his air conditioner as if he couldn't hire someone to do those kinds of things for him.
At least Cook gets to take more shots now. Or will Kid's team trade him for a players that come with a sling and a crutch.
Just starting this season....serious players only...
5x5 roto
Batting
Home Runs (HR) Runs Scored (R)
Stolen Bases (SB) Slugging Pct (SLG)
On Base plus Slugging Pct (OPS)
Pitching
Strikeouts (K) Walks plus Hits Per Innings Pitched (WHIP) Saves (SV) Quality Starts (QS)
Holds (HD)
Snake Draft will be March 7, 2007 at 6 pm PCT....
5 keepers
If interested, pleaase e-mail me dbartholomew@gmail.com
Cheers!
1. Alex Gordon, Royals (23) 276.4
2. Evan Longoria, Devil Rays (21) 206.8
3. Kevin Kouzmanoff, Padres (25) 154.2
4. Andy LaRoche, Dodgers (23) 144.0
5. Billy Rowell, Orioles (18) 120.5
Those are all monster scores.
117 Apparently Kouzmanoff is already annointed starter this year for the Padres, too? Wonder if he's ready for that. Guess we'll see!
Score above 100 is awesome.
http://tinyurl.com/yu5pya
Anyone notice the Padres signed Robles?
I can't wait for the 1st game of the year and watch JP bunt for a single, steal 2nd, go to 3b on a Furcal gb and then watch Nomar score him on a 1st pitch SF as we win 1-0 behind Schmidt/Billingsly/Broxton/Saito.
"UPSIDE is determined by evaluating the performance of a player's PECOTA comparables. If a comparable player turned in a performance better than league average, including both his batting and fielding performance, then twice the number of runs he contributed above average is counted toward his UPSIDE."
xeifrank@yahoo.com
So you want to go back to 1966?
Or perhaps an era that never existed?
http://www.snopes.com/sports/baseball/dodgers.asp
No, just back to 4/16/04.
116 I don't think its a bad idea, in about 2-3 weeks, they will start lining their pitching up for the start of the season and as we talked about earlier, barring any rainouts, the Dodgers don't have a lot of off days.
Here is my first prediction of the year re starting rotation, however, I am not ready to predict the 5th starter so that will be blank for now.
April 2nd @ Milwaukee - Derek Lowe
April 3rd @ Milwaukee - Jason Schmidt
April 4th @ Milwaukee - Brad Penny
April 6th @ San Francisco - Randy Wolf
April 7th @ San Francisco - Derek Lowe
April 8th @ San Francisco - Jason Schmidt
April 9th Colorado - Brad Penny
April 10th Colorado - Randy Wolf
April 11th Colorado - 5th Starter
April 13th San Diego - Derek Lowe
April 14th San Diego - Jason Schmidt
April 15th San Diego - Brad Penny
Jason Schmidt pitches so well at AT&T Park that since he would be on sufficient rest, it would make sense to pitch him there and despite Penny's last outing in Colorado in 2006, he owns the Rockies so he makes sense to open up again Colorado and then you line up the top 3 guys in the first series against the Padres.
Except Dave Roberts and Jason Schmidt have switched sides now.
And that is a good thing. Just saying with JP and Furcal at the top of the lineup and not much pop I expect to few more games like that.
Regardless of my sabermetric leanings, when it comes to watching a game at the stadium I love to watch speed in action and would much rather watch a player work his way around the bases then see a solo home run. That is just me and I understand I'm in the minority and that JP is not the ideal CF or even an outfielder that I wanted but he's here so I'm going to try to have fun watching him play a key role in the Dodger 2007 season.
Toy and Marty, I'm with you. Expectations are one thing, but in the moment, I'll be pulling hard for Pierre or whomever.
No bites on Taxi, huh?
2007 NL West Standings
1. Dodgers (91-71)
2. Padres (87-73)
3. Diamondbacks (84-78)
4. Giants (78-84)
5. Rockies (67-95)
Schmidt, Lowe, and Penny (Billingsley if Penny's traded) combine for 45 wins; Randy Wolf has mediocre success (11-9, 4.21 ERA)
Broxton has a sub 2.25 ERA, 70+ IP
Andy LaRoche gets 250+ PA, hits at least 10 HR (1:25 ratio)
James Loney hits .310+ in 400 PA
Juan Pierre stinks and no one likes him and he takes his $44 million and cries in a corner.
Vilicich watch, and repair in old San Pedro. Pat is a friend of mine, and they work on antiques as well as high end stuff.
Player Year Salary Years WARP MORP CPI BAD BADr
Mo Vaughn 1999 $88,000,000 6 10.1 $7,023,315 .88 -$91,671,718 -$15,278,620
Mike Hampton 2001 $121,000,000 8 18.3 $17,207,490 .96 -$108,399,488 -$13,549,936
Chan Ho Park 2002 $65,000,000 5 8.8 $6,567,329 .94 -$62,030,436 -$12,406,087
Albert Belle 1999 $65,000,000 5 11.6 $12,361,525 .87 -$60,365,224 -$12,073,045
Darren Dreifort 2001 $55,000,000 5 4.0 $2,233,612 .92 -$57,479,726 -$11,495,945
Jeff Bagwell 2002 $85,000,000 5 21.4 $31,019,487 .94 -$57,304,154 -$11,460,831
Juan Gonzalez 2002 $24,000,000 2 5.1 $3,749,912 .90 -$22,500,098 -$11,250,049
Mike Piazza 1999 $105,000,000 7 35.2 $39,005,017 .90 -$73,678,609 -$10,525,516
Ken Griffey Jr 2000 $116,500,000 9 27.7 $29,348,726 .95 -$92,169,385 -$10,241,043
Denny Neagle 2001 $51,000,000 5 6.3 $4,947,730 .92 -$50,165,872 -$10,033,174
Kevin Brown just missed the cut or we'd have 4 Dodgers on the list. Two we signed and two we let go.
Frank "Hondo" Howard?
Or
Frank Robinson?
Or
Len Gabrielson who led the team in homeruns in 68
I demand full credit!
1. Reverend Jim: A Space Odyssey:
When you could tell a joke about drug use and of course the age old question, "What does a yellow light mean?"
2. Elaine's Strange Triangle: Alex at a gay "Studio 54" disco dancing the night away.
3. Zen and the Art of Cab Driving: "And tonight we will be featuring a Sinatra retrospective."
4. Jim the Psychic: I will leave this to Bob but keep the green sweaters and catcher's mask hidden.
5. Alex's Old Buddy: Elegant Iggy, the Latka/Simka stories are better episodes but the last scene with Alex and Buddy's leash always gets me.
He came to camp early, takes his role seriously, and actually knows how to bunt. Who was the last Dodger we could depend on to execute a good bunt? Brett Butler? It is a lost art.
The Money Ball Doctrine seems to be what is driving the attacks on Pierre. We've been though this before, but a lot of posters maintain that stolen bases have no impact on the game. Do these posters really believe that pitchers can throw as well with a stretch or a slide step with runners on? They lose focus and velocity. That leads to hits, walks and scoring.
Posters attack Pierre for his weak outfield arm. But if these folks really do drink all of the Money Ball cool aid, then they must conclude that fielding, too, has little impact on the game.
My hunch is that Pierre will hit near .300 and steal 50 bases this season. His speed and Furcal's will create tremendous havoc for pitchers. When was the last time we saw that kind of base stealing threat from two or more players on the same team?
Would I have preferred for Ned to have picked up a power hitter? Sure. But none were available at prices Ned was willing to pay. Did management pay too much for Pierre? Not sure. Ned countered an existing offer from the Giants. I don't worry too much about what managment pays ballplayers. It ain't my money!
Is your last name "Waves"?
1) Maximize value by investing in players who are undervalued.
2) Use statistical analysis to determine which players are undervalued.
Given that $45M for JP seems to be minimizing value by investing in overvalued statistics.
That being said I agree with the general sentiment of your post. Hating JP is a moot point now. We are now firmly entrenched in the wishful thinking portion of the year and so I hope he does well and helps the team win the World Series. He can do that starting or off the bench and frankly I don't care which. I wish him the best.
But the doctrine itself is sound. It is no different than the stock market.
1. Signing Jason Schmidt.
2. Signing Mike Lieberthal
Here are the so-so, I am not going to war about it moves.
1. Signing Randy Wolf for one year.
Here are the Ned's holding prospects hostage moves.
1. Resigning Nomar for two years.
2. Signing Luis Gonzalez for one year
Here are the head scratching what did the agent have on Ned moves that will be debated throughout 2007 and beyond.
1. Signing Juan Pierre for 5/45 million.
Now, Luis Gonzalez might fall into this category but it is only for one year so the damage, if any, is minimal.
BTW, RE: 148 Dave Roberts of course was a great bunter, and would have been far more valuable to us if he had been able to stay healthy as a Dodger. Most importantly, unlike Pierre, he could work a walk, and had some power. He also had a great SB success percentage. DePo himself later regretted giving him up to the BoSox for next to nothing. Now that I think about it, I wouldn't have minded a short term deal to bring Roberts back, but I think Ned was probably scared off by his age and injury history, and I do think he genuinely likes Pierre's skill set.
WWSH
Being fast is great. Being able to steal a base is great too. Being able to get on base, hit for power and not make outs are even better.
I'm not happy Juan Pierre is on the team, especially given the length of his contract. But I will root for him, because I am a Dodger fan. I just hope he is able to somehow increase his OBP, not get thrown out stealing so often and learns how to count cards.
vr, Xei
I'm not going to root for Pierre to be better than he is (because then I'd be wrong, and I'd rather not be wrong), but I'm willing to root for him to get all of the hits he'll get in clutch situations. That way I still get to be right, and we get to fight over whether his clutchiness is chance or force of will.
135 Speaking of standings predictions, the Street and Smith preview has the Rockies finishing 2nd. 2nd! Nothing against the Rox but I think that seems a year or two too early. Who wrote the NL West section you ask? Tracy Ringoslby of the Rocky Mountain News. Just sayin'. (Dodgers were predicted 1st, which is probably a jinx.)
I don't think anyone is arguing that, given the "correct" strategy, $60 million can always beat $120 million. From Oakland's point of view, however, they don't get to choose to spend 120; they (in our example) only have 60. So, the question then becomes not how to necessarily beat the 120 teams, but rather how to field the best team possible with 60.
With that in mind, the task then centers on identifying stats that make a greater contribution to (e.g.) scoring runs/preventing runs than is widely believed at the time (with these beliefs being represented in players' salaries).
Ignatowski: You know, you really need to clean up those bathrooms.
Alex: You just came from the kitchen.
Ignatowski: Thank God.
---
Louie: Ignatowski's got a father? There goes my spore theory!
The team with the $120 million only gets to spend that extra money on players who have started to decline. If free agency typically happened at age 25-27 instead of age 28-30, the Moneyball philosophy would be much less effective. Instead, a $60 million team can field a roster full of players at the peak of their careers, and the $120 million dollar team can't do anything about it.
For example, dumb GMs pay for things like BA and SBs from hitters, and Wins and Saves from pitchers.
Also, the I have to yet to see a team filled with with VORP/OPS/EQA projections actually win in the end. Often after the fact, you will find that its the teams filled with players who broke out, vets who squeaked out one more good year and some breaks with injuries ultimately win it all, that is what makes baseball great. Trust me if there was a formula, "Moneyball" or whatever that was predictable, a lot of people would be on it.
That said, the Braves, Twins, A's, and Cards have been successful over the last few years by being able to bring in new talent while not having the biggest payrolls. The Yankees, Angels and Red Sox have done it the other way, spending a lot while getting a little help from the system.
Also, just for those who long for past days in CF, take a look at 3-Dog, Willie Davis' stats in CF, while he hit more homers, his other offensive stats are not dissimilar to Juan Pierre, all the Dogers did with 3-Dog was win a couple of titles and three pennants.
Ned Colletti, on the other hand, deserves every bit of nasty, vicious criticism we can dump on him. He needs to be beaten daily with a Plaschke stick.
I rooted for Maury Wills, too. He was a pretty good player. Now, however, he's proven himself to be an idiot. He's fair game. Just like Ned and Plaschke and Joe Morgan and all the "Moneyball" deniers who are the enimies of reason.
Bullethead OPS+: 86
Davis EQA: .276
'Head EQA: .256
Dont cry to me if his steal sparks a game 7 rally in a playoff series.. Repko would trip over himself and get a high ankle sprain.
But this team's pitching staff doesn't start with Koufax and Drysdale atop a 15-inch high pitching mound.
For what little it's worth, Willie Davis had a better stolen base success rate too (75.2% vs. 73.6%).
But you should. Given that the payroll dollars are finite, you should, as a fan, have some concern on how those resources are allocated in order to place a team on the field that has the best chance of winning now and in the near future. Tying up about $9 million a year in Jean Pedro is not the best use of those resources. (As a fan, I will hope against hope that we get more OBP .361 and up seasons [he has three out of six full-time] than OBP .332 and down seasons [he has three also] and that he has an 85% or better success rate stealing bases, but realistically, I'm far from expecting it.)
Really, we can dump on Pierre all we want to. The part that seems funny to me is that it's an awful contract--and it is, there's no question--yet I have an odd suspicion Pierre will be helpful, and will contribute meaningfully to the team's success. (There's no 'reason' involved there, so I'll take 20 lashes with the Plaschke stick and deserve every one of them.)
Gonzales, alas, will be useless. Hopefully he'll do little more than spell Loney or Kemp.
New post will be coming up top.
I was just comparing 'Head and Willie Davis in response to an earlier statement. But it wasn't meant to be sarcastic, at all, just a lame line.
162 That's what makes baseball so great. Drafting well, luck, injuries, the wild card -- there are so many variables. I love it that the Yankees haven't been able to magically spend their way to a WS win these past years.
163 Agreed. Bad contracts sink a higher-payroll team down into the muck with everyone else. Inefficiency can kill you if it happens enough. I'm still optimistic that the Dodgers have spent wisely enough (or not badly enough) that their free agents + minor leaguers will make them the team to beat in the NL.
164 But everyone gets the chance to draft well, so that evens out somewhat, despite long term differences in draft order. After a series of bad drafts or trading away young talent, then, yes, you find yourself like the Yankees and unable to always beat lower payroll teams. But if they had played the drafting and payroll game smarter they would have an inherent advantage.
[Sorry, but the professor in me says I have to respond to everyone's comments.]
There are people who actually study the game. They use numbers to illuminate the issues, not to buttress their own prejudices. That is to say, they're reasonable people. Some of them are smart people. They don't hate Juan Pierre; they just don't think he's very good. In fact, objectively speaking, he's lousy.
Ned and Plaschke and Jim Tracy and their ilk aren't interested. They are the enemies of reason. (I know I'm repeating myself, but I wanted to keep going until I got the right spelling.) In a word, the problem is they're dumb.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.