Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Dodger Thoughts readers know how concerned I am with how player injuries are treated - under cover of SI.com, I got to explore the issue:
When he jogs onto the field, the ballpark comes to a hush. His performance can make or break a season.He could be your team's MVP, except he's not a pitcher or a hitter.
He's a trainer.
All year long, from Opening Day through the World Series, into the Hot Stove League and back again, baseball fans scrutinize stats and scouting reports and transactions, looking for any edge they can. In the midst of all this, the teams' medical staffs hide in plain sight, peppering the media with injury updates but otherwise doing their work in a void few can penetrate.
The best trainers approach their job with the meticulous and tireless effort that Tony Gwynn brought to analyzing opposing pitchers -- with the added knowledge that someone's season or career could depend on their work.
"The medical department has to believe they have an impact, and that they are responsible and accountable," said Dodgers head trainer Stan Conte, who also serves as the team's director of medical services. "If there a lot of injuries, there are excuses such as, 'You have an older team,' or 'This guy has always been hurt.' But I think at some point the medical department has to take it on themselves and say, 'We've had these cards dealt -- what can we do to keep players on the field as much as possible?'"
Treating an injured player is a bit like trying to follow Mapquest directions from here to Tierra del Fuego. Standard operating procedure exists, but there are believers and non-believers, steady hands and shaky ones, by-the-bookers and innovators. There are choices, and it does matter who is doing the job. ...
So, is part of the Dodgers' injury problem not having up-to-date rehab facilities? Maybe that item should be next on McCourt's checklist for improving the fan experience.
I agree. I like Conte. Jon, were these quotes from a direct interview you had with him? If so, it sounds like it was an enjoyable conversation.
Gagne, formerly a dominant closer for the Los Angeles Dodgers, has missed most of the past two seasons after undergoing elbow and shoulder surgery. The Rangers want him to get more innings before he pitches in a majpr league game and are hoping to get him back by April 13, when they play the Seattle Mariners.
"He's feeling great," pitching coach Mark Connor told the Web site. "He just needs to pitch more innings."
Akinori Otsuka, who had 32 saves last year, will be the closer until Gagne returns, the Web site reported.
Here's a post of mine from DT I wrote back in 2003:
"I'd like to register a complaint against the Dodger training staff. (I believe you have made similar comments.) Doesn't it seem to you that an above-average number of medical controversies seem to befall our boys in blue? Green's shoulder, McGriff's groin, Perez's finger, Beltre's appendix, the various - and expensive - disabilities of Brown and Dreifort."
Perez, if you recall, pitched with a bad finger - and got lit up - because nobody believed him. Beltre, Brown and Dreifort need no explanation. I can't recall McGriff's issue.
"Somewhere, within the nexus of players-trainers-coaches, is a dysfunction. Does Jim Tracy throw his top players on the field, no matter how poor their health? (Wow - imagine quiet ol' Jim, acting like Bear Bryant.) Is Stan Johnston's crew simply bad, misdiagnosing injuries? Budget cutbacks in the trainer's office? (Think "Major League," with the jury-rigged whirlpool. Also, Marge Schott's 14-year reich in Cincinnati had penny-wise pound-foolish training staff; remember the scandal over Eric Davis' lacerated kidney in the 1990 World Series?)
Is there mistrust between the players and Johnston, where they'd rather lie? The first man I'd like to testify on this topic is Odalis Perez.
Johnston, going off the media guide, is an organizational soldier, but behind the lines, if I may stretch the metaphor. He started with the Great Falls team in 1985 and has worked his way up the chain: Bakersfield, Albuquerque and assistant in The Show. I'm not going to lay everything at Johnston's feet - who knows what's happening behind closed doors. But this is a matter that needs to be addressed in the offseason. Will Dan Evans do it? This is his second year as Johnston's boss, so he should have formed an opinion by now. If the team is sold, with the new owners even look in that direction, or will they be too busy hiring architects and contractors so they can cram housing into Chavez Ravine, or lobbying for a downtown stadium? Good organizations are proactive about the health of their players - end of story."
On that last question, I guess we finally have an answer.
Anyone else find the dateline, the location, ironic in some way? Or almost tauntingly facetious. Made me laugh anyway.
For exapmle when Gagne says "I feel great" It translates into "I will be going on the DL shortly."
Or
"Its only minor disconfort, I will be back in a few days" This translates into one of two things: "I will be extending my time on the DL" or "I will require surgey very soon."
Or
"My arm injury is completly healed" Translation: "My arm is healed but my back, leg or hip are now injured by compensating for my arm."
Or
"I am the boss" translation "My agent is the boss"
Good luck Texas. We will try and translate for you as the season progresses. In the meantime, just be greatful you still have Otsuka.
Does anyone know where future games for the Dodgers can be purchased on a game day? I am pretty sure it is the ticket counter up by the top deck and not the ones by Pavilion seats.
Thanks,
Kevin
The trainer in the bottle.
Every level inside the stadium has a ticket booth for future games. They are located around home plate.
For outside the stadium, the ticket booth is located on the first base side of the reserve level.
(Don't send me to Jacksonville, don't send me to Jacksonville, don't send me to Jacksonville...)
Have a seat kid.
This is always the toughest part of the job for any blogger ...
It's like im becoming Ned's cheerleader. Yuk.
"I know from experience you just can't put a date on anything," Gagne said. "They're pulling the reins in on me, and it's good. They feel there's no reason for me to push it, and I totally understand it. I don't feel I need a lot of innings. But, do I need some innings? Yeah, maybe."
In other words, I learned a costly lesson about my body in Los Angeles. Not costly to me, of course. Costly to them.
Sorta like the Depo situation with Beltre. People were mad at Depo for letting AB get away, but really they could be calling him a .lucky fool for the huge offer he did make, given how bad Beltre has been since then.
Or, it's possible that in both cases, the Dodger GM knew his offer would be beat, and figured it cost nothing to make a generous, but bound-to-be-unsuccessful bid to an overrated local hero.
2001 Anaheim Angels (40 AB's)
and the 2003 LA Dodgers (38 AB's)
and the 2004 Kinetsu Buffalo (well, probably only Bob would know that one).
http://tinyurl.com/2xomso
McCourt's as well.
True, but Seattle thought it was purchasing the services of a player coming off a WARP3 season of 12.8.
His contract is $64MM over 5 years.
The Dodgers' offer was for six years plus an option for a seventh. I can't find for how much, but it might've been for $60MM.
Half a thought... Seattle believed that was Beltre's new level of performance, but they appear to have paid for a massive fluke.
If you're going to take it to the rack, you've got to come in strong!
1) "Before last year, the Braves had won a record 14 consecutive division titles. Thus, with a sour taste in his mouth, Schuerholz entered this past offseason knowing that he had to erase the inexperience that existed on last year's pitching staff and replace it with proven arms."
http://tinyurl.com/398ujv
2) "The Arizona front office, looking to counter conventional wisdom, recently studied teams from the past 40 years and found that an emphasis on youth doesn't necessarily mean putting winning on the back burner. The Diamondbacks discovered that 12-15 clubs -- from the mid-1960s Orioles to the George Bell-Jesse Barfield Blue Jays to the Barry Bonds-Bobby Bonilla Pittsburgh teams in the early 1990s -- had an extended run of success while featuring players age 25 or younger."
Naturally, I seem to have lost the link to where the Diamondback item appeared. It wasn't the D'backs' site, tho it could be there somewhere. If anyone's up for a scavenger hunt, it's out there on the wild, wild, web...
A question: is there a general belief that pitchers need more experience than position players before they're ML-ready?
You've still got the wrong league!
In 2004 the Buffaloes would have played against the Lions, Hawks, Marines, Blue Wave, and Fighters.
That's more likely. I'm sure Barnes' stay in Osaka was memorable.
I wanted to go up to him and talk a little Dodgers baseball until I remembered that he had been fired this year.
That is, after all, why he was shopping at Target in Upland and not misjudging more injuries in Florida.
Is it perverse or strange to want to shake the hand that rubbed down Gagne's shoulder during his Cy Young winning season? Or the hands that bandaged Nomar so he could hit the homerun off Seanez in the 10th?
Maybe it is, but I still wanted to do it.
His sons whisked him away to the Pizza Hut line before I could conjur up a way to say hi and talk baseball without addressing his recent firing.
Oh, well.
http://tinyurl.com/yrc86e
as linked here:
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/612253.html#57
Great. This new Gameday promises to magnify the gameday problems to truly frustrating heights.
No, but it does have a computerized Charlie Steiner misjudging flyballs
I think you got that reversed.
http://tinyurl.com/28lrrf
67 I kind of thought there probably wouldn't/shouldn't be much difference. Either a pitcher or position player would be called up when a team thought he was ready to help them and the team had a need.
But I wondered if such a practical approach might violate a MLB Commandment/tradition or something.
Could mean interesting things for Kershaw.
BTW, I do agree with Ned that you have to have some veteran balance with the youth; we just disagree on where the fulcrum is.
When was the last time a DH was used in a game at Dodger Stadium? Has it always been used in the Freeway Series?
I think he actually went the other way
Umm...Okay.
You know..."Boooo-arnes"
Thanks in advance for the info. Living in CO, it seems like it might be the 2nd best alternative -- after DT...thanks, all -- for staying up-to-date with the Blue.
Gameday works pretty well for Windows users. Mac users have bugginess, as I can attest, though there are some fixes for it. Helps to have a real fast connection. But it's worth it if you're not in the LA area.
114 Who said that? Vinnie was just talking about how big Betemit is.
Nicely done, Ethier!
Well, Gary Matthews Jr just did what he does best, rob someone of a hit.
So sayeth the ad board.
Bummer
51 total predictions, plus two more from Eric Enders and El Lay Dave that didn't have records (although they both predicted playoffs). There were a few predictions that had multiple records; in those cases, I used the first prediction.
The average record (both the mean and median) was 89-73.
4 people predicted 100+ wins
21 predicted 90-94 wins
24 predicted 81-89 wins
2 predicted under .500
The most common record picked was 90-72.
(At pitching, not drawing)
i dont think anyone thinks tomko is better then billingsley. I think the dodgers are thinking in Billingsley's long term future by having him break into the big leagues in the bullpen.
hes only 22, no rush i guess.
There are two outs, Mike.
Aside from being left handed, what does Randy bring to the table?
strikeouts!
Injuries have limited his ability to use his golden arm the last couple of years. maybe hes just rusty with control a bit.
Until we hit into a triple play...Bahh
Garey Ingram he ain't.
Ross Porter are you looking that one up for us?
I'll start with, the long-gone player who thought bandleader Xavier Cugat's first name started with a Z.
It's PRACTICE, man. PRACTICE!
175 I'm just disappointed that Vin didn't tell me about how Vlad used to drink from puddles in the DR. I was sure that I was gonna hear about that.
The Office Marathon of Reruns has little intros and scenes featuring Toby, where he talks about the importance of HR.
Just thought I'd let you know what you're missing if you're still watching this game.
That's the kind of behavior that got Apollo Creed killed.
Definitely a must-read, especially during spring training.
Other DTers, decent article about Jason Werth today: http://tinyurl.com/34r9px
And for what it's worth, the 2007 Dodgers' 95-67 record rested on the rejuvenated left shoulder of Randy Wolf, who picked up right where he left off at the end of 2006 in winning his first 11 decisions of '07 en route to an impressive 17-10, 185 inning season. Wolf's importance went beyond the numbers, however, as not only did the lefty hold the rotation together during extended injury absences from Jason Schmidt and Derek Lowe, but his newly-migrated Wolf Pack quickly won over the Dodger faithful after eating several beach balls during Wolf's first home start.
On the offensive side of the ball, surprising power surges from Wilson Betemit and an oddly healthy Nomar Garciaparra (the duo combine for 52 home runs) combined with the constant base-stealing, extra-base-taking, 2002 Angels-esque antics of Juan Pierre and Rafael Furcal, and what pundits declare "an offense almost as deep as most American League teams", and the team built a comfortable 5-game NL West cushion by mid-September. In a preview of further late-season heroics, however, the Dodger's divisional crown was secured on September 23rd in Arizona, when Diamondback starter Randy Johnson was pounded for five home runs: two from Betemit and one each from LF Andre Ethier, new second baseman Marlon Anderson (installed as starter after Jeff Kent's suspicious "motorcycle-related injury" caused him to retire in May), and post-deadline waiver acquisition Rich Aurilia.
However the move that stunned baseball fans everywhere and won over an entire new generation of Dodger fans was the surprise trade on July 31st of disappointing OF prospect Matt Kemp, along with promising young arm Jon Meloan, to Seattle for OF Ichiro Suzuki. Upon learning of the deal, Dodger manager Grady Little famously commented, "Well I'll be, we've already got two leadoff hitters, so we'll just hafta see how many this fella can drive in!" Suzuki did not disappoint, as Little's unorthodox insertion of Suzuki into the 3rd slot in the lineup resulted in a scorching 75-hit, 55-RBI stretch run, along with 13 of Ichiro's career-high 17 home runs.
In the postseason, the layered lineup of Pierre, Furcal, Ichiro, Betemit, Ethier, Anderson, catcher Russ Martin, and Aurilia rumbled through a 4-game victory over the Wild-Card Marlins (the sole win coming on Anibal Sanchez and Dontrelle Willis's unforgettable combined no-hitter). The Dodger juggernaut then outlasted a tired Phillies team in a grueling seven-game NLCS, which set league records for most runs, home runs, and stolen bases in a 7-game playoff series. In the Dodgers' first World Series appearance since 1988, however, the playoff-tested and now strategically-rested Detroit Tiger pitching staff proved too much for the Dodger bats, and a thrilling season ended in disappointment when Game 6 starter Brad Penny was torched for 5 runs in the first inning. One bright spot did emerge from the Series-clinching shellacking, however, as general manager Ned Colletti applied a new twist to an old slogan in the dejected postgame press conference: "Wait 'til next year...when Billingsley [whose six scoreless innings in relief of Penny kept Dodger dreams alive] is in the rotation!"
boooooooo.
Pujol_Junkie: what e'score did you get on this test e'gain?
MannyTheTorpedoes: passed mang 67 persent
Pujol_Junkie: eesh that's not e'so good
MannyTheTorpedoes: manny D'ing manny
Lyons said he heard it was Eva and Grace
I won't ruin the line for those that haven't seen it.
Grace Garciaparra
thanks d4p
Whoa. We don't go around thanking D4P. For anything. Ever.
In years past, I would park in Lots 32 or 34 out on outer edge across from the RF reserved level entrance.
So, this is my plan but I mistakenly entered through the Sunset entrance, where I was immediately directed to park in Lot 7.
Now, I counted 2 guys out on Sunset, 2 guys at the next signal, the usual amount at the gate, now Lot 7 had a number of people who were directing us all to park facing exit and were parking us aisle to aisle.
On the one hand, it didn't take long to park because you had no choice but it may not be exactly where you wanted to park.
I did learn that the walk from Lot 7 is about the same as from old lot 32.
For the record, I did get to the park about 40 minutes before game time so that could have also led to the ease of parking though they could use some help directing all of us to lot 7.
Leaving the park was not that bad though I hope they plan to eventually use some of those extra people as we leave, there was no one in the lot directing us out, we managed okay, in fact I got out in about 3 minutes and was on Sunset before I knew it.
The real test will come Opening Day and then the first Friday night game so overall, no real impact but I think it was probably easier for the preferred parking folks because they had less cars to deal with driving round and round.
I think everyone else here talked about the game. Highlight was probably Chad, though Tsao threw some nasty stuff. Chad was efficient if not overpowering, we'll see how that shakes out as the season goes on.
I was allowed to park anywhere I wanted once inside the lot.
I'm uploading some photos now and I'll forward them on to Jon.
102)
I sometimes do not understand our fans. We are so quick to burn someone at the stake for an error, let alone an error in an exhibition game. And then most of the people around me were too focused on yelling Barry like taunts at Matthews Jr. For once I would love to see a game where we cheer on our team without acting like idiots towards the visitors. Oh well, that will never happen.
Oh, it looked like to me that Pierre's CS was a botched Hit and Run that Barnes could not make contact with. It was a delayed steal..
214 Was that mostly people in the bleacher seats, or reflected all over the stadium? I've seen incredibly boorish behavior in those bleachers, but a lot less so elsewhere. What's in the beer they're serving out there? (Besides just a lot of it...)
Lots of empty seats along the first base side in the reserved.
The AM/PM All You Can Eat Pavilion seemed to be popular.
Very few beach balls. ToyCannon and I noticed only one.
It was bleachers, but I have seen a lot of cheering like that all over the park. Plus, we tend to boo our players too often when they make mistakes rather than trying to encourage them. Maybe its just to hard to find a cheer that expresses "it's okay, we still believe in you"
However walking through the lot did seem a little more peaceful.
Opening Day will be the test for the system. The handout you were given when you came in states rather earnestly that general parking will likely be full for sold out games and that carpooling was strongly encouraged.
Media guides are on sale but Yearbooks will not be available until Opening Day.
Leaving didn't seem too bad, but there weren't many people left at the end of the game. I did see some one having trouble backing out of their spot (they couldn't pull forward because a pesky car was in the way) and one of the traffic guys stopped our lane to make sure the person was able to back out. I thought that it was kind of cool.
The AM/PM pavilion was pretty cool. I'm not sure I'd do it again, but I will say that they seemed well prepared. The lines were sparse and they were ready. We went back a handful of times and probably spent a total of 5 minutes in line. The flow was better than the other stands, but they didn't have to worry about money. The crowd also seemed better behaved than what usually shows up in the LF pavilion.
As for other new developments, I'm not sure that I'm a fan of the redesigned New Era caps. I'll give it a couple of weeks just to see. My cap from last season is a disaster and I can't wear it in public anymore.
http://music.yahoo.com/read/news/41620594
http://tinyurl.com/2bgcwr
Not a single post yet.
Too many O'Douls at the Stadium...?
229
People generally hate me because I'm beautiful. I tell them not to.
---
Anyone hear anything new on the last roster spots - Bigbie, Valdez (I assume they're waiting on that to see how Furcal looks), Loney, Seanez (whom I'm assuming has it locked over Tsao at this point..), all that kinda stuff? I assume moves will be made by tomorrow.
We all love D4P for the incredible quantity of his posts. While his posts are generally empty of merit they do seem to serve as a muse for GB and others thus resulting in many an inspired conversation that he indirectly started.
It's a thankless job
http://tinyurl.com/24pthn
"Hope that when Barry Bonds breaks Hank Aaron's home run record he does so in Los Angeles, so the fullest possible torrent of boos and ill-will envelope the ceremony. And that it happens sometime between the third and seventh innings, which is when Dodgers fans arrive and leave.
Hope that Aaron refuses to see it in person."
I hope it happens in SF, and preferably not against the Dodgers. Maybe against Pittsburgh.
The last thing baseball needs is the kind of ugliness he envisions, and I'd just as soon Los Angeles not be a part of such a spectacle.
T'would serve him right. Get a haircut, you dirty hippie!
240- My theory is that the IRS is waiting for him to hit 754 before they indict. Just to twist the knife, so to speak.
1. i'm really rooting for tsao to make the team over seanez. i think this would send a positive message to the fans that age/experience are not everything. our bullpen would immediately become more intimidating and we'd still have back-ups aplenty when injury strikes.
2. the whole bigbie/loney battle is more complicated than it seems. if bigbie had made the team, why wouldn't they just add him to the roster already? i still think there's a chance loney makes the 25 man roster, but how, i don't know.
3. i actually thought wolf looked good. bills looked ferocious, of course, but wolf's curve and changeup were nasty. i'm optimistic about his year.
4. scoring runs might be an issue this year. we NEED betemit to hit and right away. i don't see laroche as an mlb-ready option right now, so this is a crucial spot in the lineup. as for gonzo, he's not looking at all like a power threat in our lineup. i think i'll be surprised when he hits his first dinger.
5. grady's comments [via tony jackson] about our lineup with furcal out give me a pleasant thank-god-tracy's-gone feeling. i'm sure tracy would have wedged martinez or valdez into the #2 hole just because . . .
"Much like Matsuzaka, he has a five-pitch arsenal, but last year his split-fingered pitch and slider were pretty much on hold. This season he's said through his interpreter that he might have to use his full arsenal as hitters begin to catch up to him. He didn't have the best spring, but he was battling a strained calf muscle. Little said he wasn't worried and that Saito would continue to be his closer."
Telling hitters Saito didn't use his slider last year might be a bit of a hard sell.
Makes you wonder how a writer for a prestigious paper can get things so wrong. Mistakes happen (far too many of them, which doesn't help any media's credibility). Deadlines and such can result in errors if there wasn't time to fact-check. But still. Dumb.
The issue here is not just real important in the big scheme. But this adds to the tons and tons of misinformation out there about countless subjects, sports and otherwise, because media of one sort or another can't get information right. Whatever happened to 1) get the story; 2) get it all; 3) get it right; 4) get it first? Too archaic, I guess, especially #3, which often gets lost in efforts at #4--or just to apparent indifference or incompetence.
Rant, blather, rant, etc. But for a very good cause.
http://tinyurl.com/2axba3
of course, miller & meloan are options later in the year, but i'd like to see each get more experience as starting pitcher and closer respectively.
NEW YORK - The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed "My Sweet Lord" by its creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their holiest days of the year.
No word on whether it resembles Hendrickson.
Wow thanks for posting that and the Walter O'Malley website. My dad was the director of Dodgertown Camp for Boys and Dodgertown was my summer home when I was a toddler (my parents would hire Peter O'Malley to babysit me). I had no idea it was closing. Sad.
This is why the Gonzo signing didn't make sense for me to begin with. I'm not trying to get a Gonzo debate going again, but why give him 7 mill when there are plenty of guys out there who would put up similiar numbers for a fraction of the cost? Either give the job to Loney and let him work out all his OF kinks, or just go with a guy like Bigbie until Loney is ready to take over the OF job. Oh well....
At the time, who knows? Maybe he'd just invite all the other owners' sons over to play croquet and plot the demise of "the good ol' days," while forcing the kids to fetch them mint julips and cigars.
Has there been one? Is there anyone around this place who thinks the Gonzales signing (especially since it happened after The Outmaker Debacle) was a good idea? Sure, there are Collettiesque media drones who are besotten with anyone grizzly, but has anyone even taken a stab at justifying the signing hereabouts?
There was a bit of back and forth on Pierre (once we all agreed that the length of the contract was silly). But I don't remember any debate about Gonzales.
Correct me if I'm wrong (on this).
http://thestory.org/
I've seen some people argue back and forth on this...but the reason I said it is that I don't want to be responsible for turning a decent thread into an all out Gonzo war. I know Jon would LOVE that ;)
But yeah, the last thing I need to be is responsible for a Choi-like escalation.
We disagree about a lot around here, but not that.
D4P: The LuGo signing was insane! Waste of money and roster spot! As if Pierre weren't bad enough, now 2 OF spots go to banjo-hitting, noodle armed charity cases?!
JoeyP: True dat. Kent sucks too.
Everyone else: zzzzzzzzzzzz
End scene.
my dad isnt complete without at least one smart alec comment from d4p pertaining to gonzalez or pierre. its like clockwork. When you expect it to happen everytime you come on this site, it becomes old.
Not that you would, but if you're looking for me, I will be on email, but again sporadically. sam DOT brodsok AT comcast DOT net.
Here's hoping the Dodgers win the home opener and the next fifteen after that.
sam
(and if Jon starts a new thread in the next five minutes, would someone copy this up to the new one -- thx)
Obviously D4P doesn't own the D-Backs.
23
26
31
57
28
26
17
Yup, nothing curious about those home run totals...At all. Squeaky clean, I say.
I have perfect faith in Ned's character evaluation skills.
Those numbers are almost Brady Anderson curious.
HR, head thickness to neck thickness ratio
23, >1
26, >1
31, >1
57, <1
28, <1
26, <1
17, <1
I don't like the Gonzo signing and I don't want to stick my head in the sand about steroids, but whose HR line is below:
19, 25, 25, 17, 24, 23, 32, 17, 23, 20, 49, 24, 21, 27, 31, 22, 13, 16
I hate MLB for this. Fans have to try and decide if the guy they rooted for did 'roids or just had a really good outlier year. Can't a consistent player have a really bad outlier the same as they have a really good outlier?
The player is Andre Dawson by the way. He was 32 and hit 53% more home runs that year than in any other year in his career.
1984 - 1278
1986 - 1523
1987 - 1824
1988 - 1279
1989 - 1365
Interesting...
To be fair, when it comes to steroids, I believe every prominent power hitter (except maybe Fielder, Thomas and Griffey) was on the juice in the mid-late 90's. Heck, we knew kids in high school that were juicing (I'm looking at you, Spur Posse).
Do you think that a jump like that can be attributed to this? Was the Hawk on roids?
That is why I hate the steroids era. 2700 hits, 438 homers, 1500 RBI, 314 steals, an MVP, 8 gold gloves, and 8 All-Star games and he isn't in the Hall. If you had asked the question in 1995, I think most would have said he was a first or second ballot guy. Now his numbers are dilluted by Juan Gonzalez, Palmeiro, and others who are implicated.
Maybe Gonzo did it, maybe not...
Sorry, that last bit was non-sequitur.
No.
I'm guessing a really long time. Like the end of June. And then Gonzales says "I've been playing hurt" and team puts him on the DL with some random strain. And then he comes back, and continues to be very below average. Veteran deference prevails.
Not good, but don't his other all-around numbers count for something?
Sorry for turning this into a Dawson debate. I think I killed the chat...
291 - Here's an interesting one for you: 1877 hits, 462 homers, 1407 RBI, 200 steals, an MVP (at age 23 no less), six time all star, career OBP: .353, OPS+ : 131 and most certainly changed the way the game was played...
Universal City is kind of a mess right now and Burbank is probably worse.
Thanks in advance.
however, be warned that i'm not nearly as methodical (or skilled) with my picture-taking as say, bob t. or ken. i didn't get a lot in the way of action shots, nor do they photos i took tell the story of the game really (dodgers won). i just took pictures when it would occasionally occur to me that hey, i had a camera in my lap. oh, and there are some other random florida pictures in there too, including from the oriole ballpark in ft. lauderdale, which my friend mike and i snuck into on a non-gameday.
anyway, here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/96878938@N00/sets/1064108/
unfortunately, since this was toward the end of spring training, there weren't minor leaguers really doing drills on the side, nor were there many dodger celebrities on hand or anything that i noticed. just a game, not many side benefits. it was still pretty nice though.
Giants in LA from 4/24-4/26
304 - Is Carlos Lee really that much bigger than Nomar in person??
and your picture 30 has "desktop wallpaper material" written all over it ;)
Pierre, CF
Martin, C
Nomar 1B
Kent, 2B
Gonzo, LF
Saenz, DH
Betemit, 3B
Ethier, RF
Valdez, SS
Schmidt, P
When Ned Colletti utters the "C" word, it's not just a talking point. The way he sees it, you build the best team with players of solid character.
"We made the moves we've made -- especially during last season -- because I thought the character of the club needed to be improved," said Colletti, about to embark on his second season as the Dodgers' general manager.
Oh: and here's Ned's "Plan B" after not acquiring a big bat:
His Plan B was to load up on pitching and add a pair of World Series winners to the lineup
http://tinyurl.com/2aa4hp
Reading that article was like having a rusty fork jammed into my spleen.
DUI: Totally OK
Beating your wife: Hey, you know, sometimes broads mouth off
Being a possible juicer: Everybody was doing it.
Bad Character: JD Drew
I think I'm getting the hang of this "character" thing. Mostly, it relies on being a totally poor judge of character.
But clearly, as D4P points out and many others have before, it's cheap talk. So why doesn't anyone with a newspaper column or a TV spot have the guts to call him on it?
I guess we already know the answer to that one.
I guess it's up to The Blogs to speak truth to power.
...or wait, am I confused? Is the fact that Colletti has left him on the roster a sign that he's improved his character? I forget what Plaschke told me.
Ah, but you're online. So all you have to do is go to the Dodgers.mlb.com website and click on: Schedule
http://tinyurl.com/26te6f
Then you'd have some questions and answers!
MLB.com: What is the most important improvement from last year's team to this year's?
Little: The overall character of the players, top to bottom.
http://tinyurl.com/25erb9
Now I'm getting credit for stuff I didn't write! That's different for people mentioning things that I've already reported.
The WSJ article is on Cub Town.
We all work with bad people. All of us. But to let them affect your own performance is equally weak. If Brad Penny was less of a pitcher, or Shawn Green was less of a hitter because their teammates made them all sad inside, well, that makes me think that they were weak as well. To allow a terrible person's performance affect how you approach your work is not acceptable.
We all have co-workers that we wish would die in freak hangliding accident. Most of us don't let them affect how we do our jobs.
Just my opinion.
That's as cliche as cliche gets, and there's not one iota of evidence for it.
Yes, in a regular workplace, or even a sport in which actual teamwork is necessary to reach a goal, I could believe it (though making millions to endure a co-worker's misanthropy should lessen the sting). And I imagine there is the odd insecure mama's boy in MLB who gets sad when everyone doesn't get along and slap each other's butts, and who plays worse when he's sad. But I'm not buying that this is a general phenomenon in baseball. That's what made Gonzales's comment about the difference between veterans who want to win and kids who just want to build stats so comical. The best way to the first goal is to fulfill the second goal. In fact, it's the only way.
Anyone who wants to come to the rim with "character affects others' performance" had better come in strong. Cuz saying it doesn't make it true.
http://tinyurl.com/yp6vfm
Anybody who wasn't watching the pre-game show because he has better things to do: I resent you.
That Vin Scully would say "Chomping at the bit."
A wordsmith like Vin knows it's "champing at the bit."
Just what did they teach him at Fordham.
All my illusions are shattered.
I have better things to do - namely, go home from work, and then work from home (while listening to game). Sigh, did I say better? I meant, sadder.
I literally slept through the entire bottom half of the first.
Hey, it was a long day!
We all have co-workers that we wish would die in freak hangliding accident. Most of us don't let them affect how we do our jobs.*
This strikes me as how the would ought to be, as opposed to a discussion of how it actually is. If anything, the dysfunctional relationship between DePo and Tracy shows that interpersonal relationships do indeed matter. I think it's a mistake to overdo the character bit, but going to the other extreme and simply seeing all baseball players as completely rational actors trying to put up the best numbers possible to make the largest possible paycheck strikes me as a profoundly reductive of human behavior.
WWSH
That team stunk because it stunk. There wasn't a whole lot of talent on that squad, and no amount of cohesiveness, character, friendship, loyalty, or veteran leadership was going to make Mike Rose into Pete Rose.
Maybe I'm using anecdotal evidence to support my assertion, but my experience is that outstanding workers are outstanding, no matter what dweebs they work with.
on another front, i noticed last night that ramon martinez should re-grow his hair. i'm not one who usually would comment on this, but his head is too big for his baldness.
Now 351 is going to be around until 410 or so. Darn you, Bob, Andrew, and Jose Habib.
Do not want.
I've not read deeply into it, but aren't MLB locker rooms supposed to be like high school? All the black guys hang together, as do the white guys, and the Latin American guys? There are probably some players that nearly everybody likes, and some that nearly everybody dislikes, but those have to be rare. I've never understood why we're so sure players hate J.D. Drew. Wouldn't it make more sense to assume that they just don't care about him?
Henry Blanco threw better.
Very small.
For the record, my position remains that if good character people let bad character people affect their performance, then a) the good character people have to shoulder some of that responsibility and/or b) character is the wrong issue, and what we really need are, say, good backbone people, regardless of character.
Valdes(z) was not popular with some Dodger teammates, this is true, but that did not stop him from pitching well during the period we're discussing. So should we conclude that he was the problem, or that someone of reputed character value like Eric Karros was the problem?
In the workplace, good people don't go down to the level of bad people. Good people rise above. In the examples you describe, if batters were purposely not producing for the unpopular pitchers, then those batters are in fact the people with questionable character. If we look at it that way, then I'm willing to consider the character argument.
Barring that, I think people are way too careless in labeling the baddies.
champ, v.
2. trans. To bite upon (anything hard); said especially of a horse which impatiently bites the bit in its mouth.
chomp, v.
Formerly only dial. and U.S.
Now a widespread variant of CHAMP v. (esp. in senses 1-3).
"Champ" has better bloodlines. And I think it's Beyer speed numbers are higher too!
BTW, where is Kershaw slated to start this season, A- or A+? (if you know)
The Dodgers should see what happens when they go 10 for 16 in 3 innings in a real game. :)
Well, in that case, Vishal is a shoe-in to win any logical argument.
English is a living language, constantly evolving...
{Flees in terror...fear of Timmermann}
I accuse Greg Brock of Packerism!
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Wow, that really got out of hand quickly. Bob hit me with a trident!
I wish MLB would contract with Google to write a simple, clean, and usable live boxscore interface.
So, it's just on, then? You've decided to throw in with Vishal in this war against idioms?
I work in a very large company and I am at least very good, if not outstanding, at what I do; however, I lead a team that creates a product that goes into another product, that goes into yet another product before it is sold off to the customer who uses it in his system. No matter how outstanding I am at designing my kind of product, that will never show if the dweebs (either incompentant, or arrogant and dismissive) in the product layer above me place unreasonable (in my mind) constraints on what my product should or shouldn't be doing.
That said, I don't imagine baseball players being like this, generally. Each player is on his own when he bats, pitches, fields, throws. (On the other hand, players, collectively don't strike me as the most mature bunch.)
But add layers and managers can undermine players (playing the wrong ones, putting low-OBP batters in front of RBI guys, playing graceful 1B in the OF...), GMs can undermine managers (e.g., provide non-optimal sets of players, or bad players), owners can undermine GMs with tight pursestrings, demanding housecleanings and so on.
OK, sorry, I think I'm mentally meandering now....
We are all high-achievers at DT. Those that aren't get run off, or, like Andrew, we smile benignly and exchange jokes behind their back.
385. considering that Kemp will replace one of them, does it really matter which one?
BEST VIN QUOTE EVER: wow! everything seems 40 years ago!
How do you think Martin felt last year when he is catching every day while Drew, making 10 times as much $$, is sitting with a hangnail.
By the way, my idioms dictionary has champ and chomp (at the bit) as valid.
See Bob, this is what you get when you come down on Vinny.
I don't see how the DePodesta/Tracy dynamic affected their performance as independent actors.
But they aren't independent actors.
And I'm not referring to so much as character as the relationships between different individuals, and how they can affect larger organizational outcomes.
WWSH
you just have to admire how much of a trainwreck he is.
Amen. Trying to scroll down to see what happened during previous innings is driving me crazy. Clicking the up and down arrow is painfully slow, clicking in the bar goes too far, and dragging the scroll bar thingie jumps all around.
If pitchers or batters are less focused or less productive because they don't like their teammates...Wow. That's an indictment of their character, not the other guy's.
He did reassure us that Schmidt's velocity was up to the upper 80s - "at least on one pitch."
The Gameday app is swallowing up my computer's RAM at a pace not unlike Odalis Perez at a buffet where the amount of food you get is proportional to the amount of whining you do.
You need to go to your browser and delete all mlb.com cookies.
Kuo is pain-free now but they're still shutting him down for awhile.
And Rick Monday has put me to sleep... Night all!
"Tracy long has counted (Jose) Hernandez among his favorites, including their time with the Los Angeles Dodgers, and he became visibly emotional when describing how it felt to break the news.
'It was very, very difficult,' Tracy said."
Juss wonderin'
And then Canuck said that the Blue Jays didn't score runs for Dave Steib because they didn't like him, and all hell broke loose.
Thanks for everything, Chase Carey's mustache.
Please refrain from taking it out behind the middle school football field.
"9 to 2 Dodgers, Wilson.
Valdez.
Is the batter, Andy LaRoche.
Waiting on deck."
[dead silence]
[more silence]
uh, the new shortstop, and..."
vr,
Bob Timmermann
Andrew, I had the game (on my sales floor) on a Philips 50" plasma with 720 resolution, and it looked terrific. I watch a Samsung LCD at home with 1080 resolution.
KCAL is sending a very good HD signal on this game tonight.
439 So Monday is sort of like the Thermians from the Klaatu Nebula, in Galaxy Quest? "We-ee need. Your help."
Wait.... I've been spending too much time over on sport.BBC.co.uk.
Those players also have made the playoffs a number of times in their careers.
If those players are such cancers to the team, dont you think the teams they were playing on would have sucked?
And it happened to Roger Clemens last year in Houston, when his teammates no doubt resented his special status
LOL..This is so preposterous its almost beyond belief that anyone could actually think this. You actually think that the 8 other guys in the lineup, are going to tank at bats (and in doing so their own careers), just of spite to Roger Clemens?
All those guys are professionals. IF that ever happened, that says more about them than Roger Clemens. If I got players on my team that dog it just bc they dont like another player on the team..Guess what. The players that are dogging it are gonna be gone.
THe guys that put up #'s. Just leave them be. Thats who you need.
Character is ridiculous. How many times did we here that Billy Jenks, Carl Everett, AJ Pierzynski were terrible character players..Yet they won a title.
If AJ Pierzynski, whom by all accounts everyone hates and plays the position of CATCHER, cant sabotage a team...then what evidence is there that points otherwise.
This is just insanity.
This is borderline "the earth is flat", and "2+2=5" type of nonsense.
I'm shocked Canuck actually believes it, but maybe he's never been around pro athletes whom would never think to tank their own careers out of spite for someone else. You do that stuff anywhere, and you're cut.
Martin can hit - and he's got good character to boot! The whole package.
I suppose during the regular season, it will be CBS Sportsline or Yahoo for me.
It's not even that, for me its really that he's a bad tipper, and he - and I know this for a fact - determines which percentage of his federal taxes goes towards social services for children and deducts that from what he pays.
That said, I really do think it can be overrated (and obviously hard to quantify) and that there's a double standard when it comes to characterizing certain players as "good character" guys over others.
That's all I'll say about that lest I fall down into an abyss with this.
Did Mike Scioscia learn nothing from Pedro Guerrero, March 1986?
If were standing at the plate with a major-league pitcher hurling hard, white projectiles at 90 M.P.H. in my general direction, I doubt I'd be thinking about what a miserable product of unwed parents my teammate is.
Ugh. What a horrible, horrible memory that is.
One of them had a career path that went Angels- Dodgers-Angels.
The other one went Dodgers-Indians.
I work next to a very prickly fellow, and I just go about my business. If he were my boss, now that would be very difficult.
I am in total shock. :-O
"family"?
Talk about punchlines that can't be written on DT...
I remember when the 1980s Reggie Williams was on the Dodgers, he was featured in the LA Times as the only player on the team with a college degree.
Sweeeeeet. I look forward to June when he's up with the big club again. ;-)
Perhaps I should use something less RAM-intensive, like my search algorithm that will scour the entire web to find out how many times the letter "e" has been typed.
N-, they don't.
There is a blog where you can leave comments on it.
The last time I checked there were three. No one complained about it being a RAM hog.
"Yeah, but that's when I thought I was the crewman that stays on the ship, and something is up there, and it kills me. But now I'm thinking I'm the guy who gets killed by some monster five minutes after we land on the planet."
Lamar/Kobe missed wide open 3's that could have tied the Lakers-Rockets game.
C Martin
1B Nomar
2B Izturis
3B Betemit
SS Furcal
LF R Martinez
CF Repko
RF Lugo
1) spite
2) Chase Carey's mustache
The order varies depending upon my mood.
Kwame misses 2 FTs w/ Lakes down by 3 w/ 16 left. Kobe gets RB and nails a tre.
I don't care enough about any of this to look it up. But it has the odor of ex post facto scapegoating about it.
I have to view that in Safari.
You mean DeJesus = Brady Clark?
503 - Brock! Scott Long has something he'd like you to explain to him:
https://thejuice.baseballtoaster.com/archives/605962.html
Is there anyone in baseball as clutch as Kobe? Is that comparison even reasonable?
Is the son.
Of Chris Speier who.
WasintheCubsorganizationforawhile."
Wow, and I was watching that show too!
I should really go look for a new apartment. Who knows what will happen to me?
I was shocked to see someone other than Kobe shoot there on that last possession.
It's a no-win situation!
I don't even know what Six Degrees is. Or are.
That sort of thinking makes me want to go and find a place to mount a satellite dish on my apartment too. I think I'm going for something that's Jodrell Bank size.
But if it's Smush, go ahead and shoot, Kobe.
What was that Kobe?
They didnt have it, then had it, then let it slip away again.
But not rude.
The Corollary remains strong.
My ---- doesn't work in the NBA.
You can only get away with that if you're Jeff Green.
I loved a USA Today story about him and how he claims that the NCAA Tournament gets good ratings because everybody talks to him about it and he was going to challenge the Nielsen rating service to get a better rating.
But a spokesman from Nielsen said, "It's not like people come up to Billy Packer in an airport and talk to him about 'American Idol'"
My wife and I started watching Futurama a few weeks ago, and to my surprise, she absolutely loves it. She wants Nibbler merchandise.
http://tinyurl.com/367yro
In Brock's era, batting average ruled. Today, the Dodgers are condemned for paying attention to the wrong statistics.
Keith Law, a former assistant general manager for the Toronto Blue Jays, labeled Pierre on ESPN.com "a player whose ideal role is defensive replacement/pinch runner." At Baseball Prospectus, a baseball think tank, Marc Normandin alluded to Pierre's high stolen base total in calling him "more useful to your fantasy baseball team than a real team." Dodger Thoughts blogger Jon Weisman, slapping General Manager Ned Colletti, said the signing of Pierre had "validated the worst fears of anyone who suspected he was too enamored of pointless statistics ... to make sensible decisions."
The criticism spread to talk shows, to message boards and even to the Dodgers' website, where public relations director Josh Rawitch pleaded for mercy for Pierre.
"I sure hope you will all give him a chance," Rawitch wrote, "to win you over."
(It's actually an interesting read.)
I hope the comments field doesn't implode after I post this.
Okay, I'm going to bed. Hope the Times article doesn't cause this blog to turn in on itself like a black hole.
night all! {Runs away}
The LA Times Quotes a blogger: Holy ----
Today, the Angels employ a statistical analyst and compile proprietary information. When they signed outfielder Gary Matthews Jr. to a five-year, $50-million contract over the winter, after career highs in virtually every offensive category last season at age 31, had the Angels developed any data to suggest Matthews might not have had a career year?
"Not really," Stoneman said. "It's more scouting-related. We got him to help with our defense, and he should be a big help. But that comes from scouting, especially defensively his first-step quickness, the jumps he gets, the routes he takes to the ball, throwing arm. It's all stuff you've got to see."
Stoneman said he considers "a lot more" than statistics in evaluating players.
"What kind of a person is he?" Stoneman said. "How does he fit within the club? Does he play with a lot of heart? Is he a distraction to the club? There's a lot of thought that goes into it."
Of course that is why I used bhsportsguy as opposed to my name.
Of course that is why I used bhsportsguy as opposed to my name.
Ned on Pierre:
"First of all, the man's character is outstanding," Colletti said. "His love for the game, his ability to prepare for the game and help other teammates, to help young players I haven't found anybody that gives the guy a B+. It's all A's, across the board. That's going to be tough to measure in a stat book.
Wonderful.
Pierre is a better fielder than Brock, who was a butcher in left field.
Favorite episodes: "The Sting", "Jurassic Bark"
"It seems like each and every year there's a new stat to look at," Towers said. "I think there are organizations that aren't looking at that type of stuff, and I think they're missing the boat."
On David Ecstein
He's an on-base machine," the assistant said.
"Look at his size," Towers said. "Look at the scouting reports."
The Padres passed. The Angels claimed David Eckstein, who developed into the shortstop on their World Series championship team.
"We followed him and saw what he ended up doing," Towers said, "and said we better start paying attention to some of these things."
And the young assistant? He was Theo Epstein, hired two years later as general manager of the Boston Red Sox, at age 28.
Ned on Pierre
"First of all, the man's character is outstanding," Colletti said. "His love for the game, his ability to prepare for the game and help other teammates, to help young players I haven't found anybody that gives the guy a B+. It's all A's, across the board. That's going to be tough to measure in a stat book.
"When we're in a close game, and somebody capable of stealing 30, 40, 50, 60 bases gets on base late in the game, that's tough to defense. The speed of the player will keep the defense moving. It will keep the pitcher in a split-second of indecision or loss of concentration. It will keep the catcher in a position of worrying about the hitter, the pitcher and the baserunner.
Colletti is pretty much what we all hoped he wouldnt be. He's as old school as Bill Bavasi and Jim Hendry. Will the Dodgers have Cub/Mariner type results?
Yes, Ned. That would be the stat everybody keeps questioning. And if JP had a lot of walks now, we would not be as upset. But he does not walk anymore, and you knew that when you signed him, you silly little mustache having man.
Wake up, Jon!
{waves arms frantically}
We had to do it away from the disapproving eyes of the DT community. We felt like the Apostles right after Jesus' crucifixion.
Like a conversation piece. Boy do I hate getting those. Then again, I've never received one with a $44 million price tag.
Just don't tell me he's an above average player.
[Sigh]
* The exclamation point expresses shock, not 5 factorial
We don't have to do this again. Maybe we could have a separate thread for this article, and keep it away from everybody who doesn't want to rehash this.
Brock also had power, making him all the more useful in a less powerful era. JP's on pace for something like 35-40 HRs in the same number of ABs as Brock.
Would she believe you if you said "Shawn Green"...?
Check the Marlins or D-Rays.
The other guy's is 86
Bunt single. OK. Great. No better than a walk or a regular single, but a hit nonetheless. Well done.
Steals 2b. Bad jump - an on-target throw would've nailed him, but it was off-line and didn't, and he's on 2nd of his own accord. Great.
Breaks back to 2nd on LD to left. Only advances to 3rd. Should have scored. A good, conservative play that you might want from a catcher or a slugger on the basepaths, but not one you want from a guy who is valuable only for his speed.
Breaks back to 3rd on the next line drive. Scores anyway, but again, it shows bad baserunning instincts.
So, in the end, he scored, and NONE of the baserunning mattered. He stole a base and then got two bad jumps on singles, and NONE of it made a dime's worth of difference.
That's the point about stolen bases that most people ignore. Even when they work, they rarely matter.
And I've heard this about Pierre since he was in Florida. That he's very fast, but has terrible baserunning skills. With his speed, he ought to get many more "extra bases" than he actually does.
Anyone have his email/Phone/MySpace?
It wasn't Loftonesque with all the twirling and spinning, but he did jump OVER the ball. It hit the wall below his glove. That means he should have had it easily.
I'm not saying I could have made the play. But a major leaguer should have. Especially one who was signed for his defense.
The main problem I see is that no one disputes that those "intangibles" are important when comes to acquiring a player because obviously thats part of the due diligence a team is going do before signing or trading for him.
However, it seems that the "intangibles" are often used to counter any statistical based discussion as if stats are just numbers on a sheet and not results of a player's performance.
Things that make you go hmmmm.....
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rosters?sortColumn=youngest_age
Nice guys aren't always closers. Mitch and Murray would not approve of this kind of thing. Juan Pierre would not get the Glengarry leads.
I would not want to live anywhere near Gary Sheffield/Milton Bradley/Jeff Kent/Kevin Brown. But those fellas, in their prime (as Pierre supposedly is now) belong. Now, if you still don't want to root for them because they're jerks, fine. But don't try to tell me they're worse players because they're jerks, any more than that JP is a better player than he really is because he's a good person.
In other words, I welcome our Floridian overlords!
Who I'm sure will take my kvetching and Daniel's constructive criticism to heart and not react to it.
Now I just hope we don't get smoked. Thanks Bill!
"That," Colletti said with a smile, "is good news."
Take that D4P!!!
CF Ranking by OPS:
Year Ranking Player
2003 14 Juan Pierre
2004 14 Juan Pierre
2005 18 Juan Pierre
2006 18 Juan Pierre
(typically 20 players qualify per year)
2003 17 Gary Matthews Jr.
2004 10 Gary Matthews Jr. (200+ ABs)
2005 11 Gary Matthews Jr.
2006 7 Gary Matthews Jr.
Ned Colletti, Dodgers
VORP: "I can't remember what the exact definition is."
BABIP: "What's that?"
Bill Stoneman, Angels
VORP: "No."
BABIP: "No."
Kevin Towers, Padres
VORP: "Yes."
BABIP: "You'd have to ask the number crunchers on that one. I couldn't tell you."
Billy Beane, Athletics
VORP: "Value over replacement player."
BABIP: "Which one is that? I don't even know what that one is."
http://tinyurl.com/383yc9
"You should just buy a new computer."
He was speaking unofficially, although I believe that would MLB.com's attitude.
He's powerless to do anything with the way that MLB.com works and he's just giving me what the attitude from his bosses would be.
It goes well will everything. Well, probably tastes bad with cereal, but that's about it.
But if it doesn't, I'm off on a rant.
This guy, a different Joe Sheehan,
http://baseballanalysts.com/archives/2007/03/digging_through.php
loved it.
And the other one should cast a shadow over the Colletti knows more than X-commenter-who-disagrees-with-any-of-his-decisions argument. He clearly knows things that other people don't, but it seems possible that he doesn't know more. And that the things he knows aren't worth more than the things other people know. All the things he knows didn't keep Kuo from pitching with a sore shoulder, for example. Or signing Juan Pierre.
Gotta appreciate those glottal stops!
---
Speaking of the Phils, old minor league friend Heath Totten is now pitching for their minor league AA team. Poor guy.
Runner on second with less than two outs...you freeze,or move back towards the base...The stat will show it was a single and the runner should have scored. What it does not show is direction, trajectory, or speed of the ball...how fast did it get to left fielder...
Runner on third with less than two outs... Anything hit in the air you move back towards the base in order to tag up if neccessary.
You see, there's these stat called runs and RBIs which can be split by situation.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.