Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
The 26-year-old came from Atlanta - and just plain struggled.
Dusty Baker had been acquired in November 1975 to be the Dodgers' center fielder of the present and future. But as Ross Newhan wrote in the Times on July 4, 1976, while the nation celebrated its Bicentennial, Dusty Baker and the Dodgers wondered what had gone wrong.
Four years earlier, Baker had received MVP votes after an outstanding first full season in the majors: .383 on-base percentage, .504 slugging percentage, 142 OPS+. At the end of that season, he was an outstanding 23-year-old in a lineup with Hank Aaron - and things could only get better, right?
Well, though Baker remained productive, his offense tapered over the next three seasons, with OPS+ marks of 117, 108 and 109. Aaron broke Babe Ruth's home run record, then headed back to Milwaukee and eventual retirement. The Braves sank into the depths of the NL West.
But then a trade to the Dodgers, near Baker's hometown of Riverside, seemed to be just the thing to rejuvenate his career.
It didn't happen. By summertime, Baker had to fight just to be in the Dodger lineup.
As Newhan noted, Baker homered in his first at-bat with the Dodgers, then went silent. He OPSed .680 in April, .587 in May and .546 in June. From May 1 to June 30, he slugged .270.
And so, of course, everyone went into confidence-building and problem-solving mode - not that these two tactics didn't butt heads.
Having racked up 296 plate appearances in the first half of the year, Baker only got 125 in the second half. His stats bounced back slightly in July - .375 on-base percentage, .383 slugging percentage - but he also began battling injuries. From August 1 on, Baker went 12 for 64 with three walks, two doubles, two homers and nine strikeouts. He finished 1976, the year he turned 27, with a .242 batting average, four home runs, a .605 OPS and a 74 OPS+.
And that offseason, the Dodgers traded left fielder Bill Buckner to get another slugging center fielder: Rick Monday.
But the following season, all the problems vanished. If anyone had predicted Baker would do in 1977, they wouldn't have rounded up many believers before the season. Baker's on-base percentage of .364, career-high slugging percentage of .512, OPS of .876 and OPS+ of 133 smashed his previous year's numbers, and were key in sending the Dodgers into the World Series. And after one more slightly subpar year in '78, Baker racked up strong offensive seasons from 1979 all the way through his final Dodger season of 1983 (and acromonious departure).
Sometimes, a slumping player is just done. But other times, even when the slump seems to have no end, a solution waits - even if it takes a month, even if it takes a year. Sometimes, you have to have the faith that the promise you've seen in a young player at the major-league level was not just in your imagination. It's a clumsy process, without a doubt, but life is nothing if not clumsy.
Wilson Betemit will never be Dusty Baker as a hitter, but it's something to think about as we wait for him to hit his first home run of the season.
(Thanks to Bob Timmermann - and best wishes on this day, by the way - for locating this Times article.)
* * *
I think this is Bill Plaschke's best column in years. It's not Jim Bouton and Ball Four, but it's a real eye-opener about clubhouse life - while the general thrust may not surprise you, the details are fascinating.
When the star Dodger routinely showed up for day games still drunk from the previous night, the clubhouse guy knew his role.
"It was my job to protect the team," Dave Dickenson said. "That's what I did."
Dickenson said he would pour a cup of beer and place it in the dugout bathroom. The star player would sneak there between innings for a drink, and continue drinking throughout the game.
"The guy couldn't play with a hangover, so we had to keep him going," Dickenson said. "Hey, he played great, and nobody complained." ...
* * *
Awesome: The ever-evolving Baseball-Reference.com will now present Dodger organizational statistics, major and minor leagues together, organized by position as well as level. Hitting has already arrived; pitching is coming soon.
B.R. is just amazing. The site keeps getting better and better.
Two things of interest:
C, Lucas May 22, Vero .319/.379/.628/1.007 with 8 home runs.
22 might be a tad old for Vero, but that is still impressive.
2B, Travis Denker 21, Vero, .339/.377/.464/.841. Nice to see Nate's one time favorite sleeper finally hitting in Vero after falling apart there twice. 21 isn't all that old, but he is the longest of long shots at this point.
I broke my year-long ban on reading Plaschke this morning, even before you linked his article, because I found the topic interesting. I guess if it was one of his best columns in years, then I made the right choice. I wonder why he can't write like this more often, using a more fact-based story rather than trying to inject his own opinions about players and the direction of the organization.
Didn't get in last night but here is a shout out to Golden State. WoooHoooo
Except they are no longer playing in Vero but in California.
With Dusty Baker, I think everyone expected Dusty to do reasonably well. They were surprised when he didnt.
With Betemit, probably half expect him to be decent, and others arent really surprised he's doing so poorly bc they have no expectations of him.
That clubhouse attendant story was a good read. It just sort of underscores however why I enjoy football much more than baseball. Its hard to respect a game in which players are allowed to drink during the game. The major leagues is no place for beer league softball behavior IMO. If I owned a team and found out that was happening, I also would have fired the attendant and suspended the player.
Its a colorful story.
But I find that sort of behavior not at all endearing or charming.
Plenty of HOF were drinking before, during, and after games. If you don't think your football players aren't on serious drugs to help with pain and performance your deluding yourself.
As for Betemit, again, again, again, it's not that we expect him to hit like Baker - it's that he's not hitting even at the level he has established. He is currently hitting so far below his established level that if you're not surprised, you should be.
Other Spots
.331/.375/.398/.773 (Martin was good here, Pierre has a relative to expectations servicable .708 OPS)
.284/.336/.414/.750 (Nomar has got to hit better, he has been extremely mediocre expect for with RISP)
.303/.384/.431/.815 (Kent has outperformed his spot with a .852 OPS, but his high BABIP and low HR rate predict a slight regression)
.255/.352/.425/.777 (LuGo has a .812 OPS even with a low BABIP, this should go up)
.273/.368/.374/.741 (Martin has a .892 OPS, but Betemit, Clark and Valdez are keeping the aggregate low)
.300/.368/.460/.828 (Fluky, Ethier has gotten most of the ABs and has a .750 OPS here but five other hitters have combined 29 PAs over 1.000 OPS)
.186/.265/.268/.534 (Betemit has been terrible, but actually only has 38 PAs here, Martinez has 42 and a .539 OPS to show for it)
.176/.267/.264/.530 The pitchers are outperforming the lead off men and equaling the 8 spot.
To sum all this up, the Dodgers should see massive improvements in the #1 and #8 spots, slight decreases in the #7, #2 and #9 spots, and slight improvements everywhere else. The Dodgers have been pretty terrible on offense despite scoring a decent amount of runs, hopefully improved performance from LF, CF, SS and 3B will make up for good luck so far.
I agree with you that the clubhouse culture of baseball hasnt changed much over time.
Maybe its because baseball has never been a game that required peak physical conditioning and performance?
Can you imagine any NBA or NFL player drinking beer on the sidelines during time outs?
If players asking the attendants to do things like wash their cars is a story, please go to your local golf club. He explicitly said that he didn't get them drugs, never saw steroids (which by the way, is more of a story) and has only one story that sounded inappropriate to me.
Other than that, it was just a chance to take a shot at how the snot players exploited the poor clubbie by not always bumping his salary by $50K per year.
If I owned a team and found out that was happening, I also would have fired the attendant and suspended the player
I can't go along with such a double standard. Either both are fired or both suspended. But before anything is done the new rules have to be discussed and given a date for their implementation.
The only thing I have against Betemit is that he is getting off to a slow start using Loney's spot to do it.
I think it illustrates the hypocrisy in baseball, where people turn a blind eye to inappropriate behavior (I'm not talking about bad tipping) - and then wring their hands publicly when someone gets in an off-field incident or tragedy, wondering how it could have happened.
Because Tracy and DePodesta were both straight out of the Animal House school of management.
I would expect that when Davey Johnson was in charge, the clubhouse probably had a lot of shenanigans.
Good read, Jon. I was also curious because I couldn't remember, who the Dodgers traded away to get Dusty Baker in that trade. It was Jimmy Wynn, Tom Paciorek, Lee Lacy, and Jerry Royster - which must have seemed like an awful lot back then, even for a young budding star like Baker. Even if at least a couple of those players were well past their prime. I wonder what i would have thought of it back then had I behind older than a toddler who didn't know "trade" from "parade." But it surely seemed like a good one within a year.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6764122
In particular:
" Like it or not, power rules all in the modern game, and the Dodgers don't have enough of it "
I usually ignore statements like that, but decided to look at last years successful teams and check it out .
The 8 teams who made the playoffs ranked as follows in HR totals: 5,6,7,12,16,23,27,28.
If you take that avg = 15.5 ranking, the 8 playoff teams were right at the median for the league (slightly below, actually). Clearly there is more to the story .
I do worry about reversion to the mean on avg. with runners in scoring position.
Thoughts?
The Dodgers reacquired Lacy in the 1976 season along with Elias Sosa once Mike Marshall had worn out his welcome.
I think you can make a case that a) power does matter generally but also b) the Dodgers might squeak by this year because their pitching is better than last year, even if their hitting is worse, at least at the moment.
What is the assumption of how it SHOULD be?
And BTW, in the end, this guy still loves the players. It's the McCourts who fired him and newsflash... say you don't like your boss at the company softball game and the possibility of getting fired comes into play.
http://tinyurl.com/yoomsp
That may be the only trade in Dodger history where my two favorite players(Wynn/Lacy) were dealt away in the same deal.
From the article is sounds like things haven't changed a bit from Ball Four days. Spoiled children playing a child's game with the only difference now is that they are now millionaires doing the same thing. Good to see the beaver tradition is still going strong.
G 297
AB 253
R 32
H 66
2B 9
HR 8
RBI 31
BB 33
SO 59
HBP 1
SH 2
SF 3
GIDP 4
.261, .345, .391, .736
.286, .339, .410, .749 (career averages)
He writes:
"And that's another reason why it's way past time to stop being overly polite about alcohol-related, or drug-related, tragedies involving current or former athletes in St. Louis. "
I wrote an e-mail to Bernie after he defended LaRussa and standing ovation fans in March, suggesting he was not taking this seriously enough, and he disagreed with me pointedly.
It's pretty frightening when you're forced to pull off to the side of the road late at night, knowing the roads are full of drivers like Hancock.
I don't see how Tony LaRussa or Cardinal fans are implicated, however. I agree with "Branch Rickey" -- this kind of stupidity is pretty evenly distributed among all occupations. But if it was your friend, your coworker, someone in your family, it's still tragic; you're still entitled to feel sorrow at the loss. Memorials are for the living.
Society teaches people what is or is not acceptable behavior. Basically, the Card's fans are society in this case.
I totally agree that LaRussa should feel great responsibility for setting a terrible example. The day Hancock died I thought if he was drunk, that should have implications for LaRussa. We'll see.
Yankees: Runs: 1 HR: 5
Detroit: Runs: 8 HR: 6
Mets: Runs: 7 HR: 7
St. Louis: 14 Runs HR: 12
Oakland: Runs: 16 HR: 16
San Diego: Runs: 26 HR: 23
Dodgers: Runs: 10 HR: 27
Minnesota: Runs: 13 HR: 28
These don't matchup perfectly since on base percentage is a more important stat in terms of scoring runs, but in general, more home runs means more runs scored, and it takes a great team on base percentage and clutch performance to overcome a lack of power, something that both the Dodgers and Twins pulled off last year.
Drinking beer during the breaks in the inning--thats not necessary at all. Its completely unprofessional.
I remember laughing at David Eckstein, when he said he couldn't drive a manual tranny, and that really he didn't drive that much anyway. If he's not into cars, and as a car guy I can appreciate that not everyone is, why should he drive or want a corvette? It is probably smarter not to do so.
If a team is like a family, and I think sometimes it really is for younger players especially ones far from home, then I think the team has some responsibility for both letting them unwind in their "home" when they are not on the field AND also teaching them how to do that responsibly.
For me with the case like Leonard Little who I thought the world of as a person and a player, it seems such a shame that a guy who has millions won't pay someoneelse to watch after him and drive him around... and that the teams and agents won't basically insure that that happens.
http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2007-05-04/#celeb12
Anyway... how about that Braves-Dodgers series this weekend - think the D's have a chance of taking 2 out of 3?
Do you think that anyone on the face of the earth, including the person who did it (if in fact anyone did) disagrees with this?
Since the Mets attendant sparked this column, I assumed his point is that this hurts the integrity of the game when it crosses over into steroids and other illegal substances. Presumably some attendants, with their income dependent on not saying "no," would buckle and get the players whatever they asked for.
Yes.
The content is perhaps better, but the short, single-sentence structure reminds me of everything I hate about USA Today.
---
Anyway. Interesting story about Baker, but if your point is that Juan Pierre's 2007 is an anomaly, well, just go ask some Cubs fans.
To true, I drive a miata and I'd be a dead man now if I just coasted while driving. Something may fly off a truck and bang me in the head and I'll attribute that to fluke but if someone cuts me off I'll only blame myself for not being on the lookout for it. If you see little cars always on the move it is because we have to be to make sure were seen. If I see someone on a cell phone next to me I move, talking to a friend, I move, next to a truck, I move, next to teenagers, I move, next to Giant fan driving, I move.
68. PalmdaleSteve1
48
"totally agree that LaRussa should feel great responsibility for setting a terrible example. The day Hancock died I thought if he was drunk, that should have implications for LaRussa."
So where does an employer, and a manager (LaRussa) treat employees conduct away from the job?
Are they to be your mother and nag you to death?
Your nanny who watches over everything you do at all times?
Or just totally clueless to anything other than getting the job done and winning?
I'm not sure I know, but consider what happens at your own work place. Where is that line (and baseball is a job) where the job gets into what you do away from the job, in short, where that privacy line?
LaRussa stepped up like a man and admitted his mistake when he had his DUI earlier in the year, but what else could the Cardinal organization do as a business for the rest of it's employees? Go all Colorado Rockies on them or what?
LaRussa goofed up, which I am sure he is totally ashamed of and regrets, but to put this on him because of what he has done, give me a break.
Actually, I'll just be happy to be able to watch the games and go to sleep before 11pm. :-)
Great bit about Baker. I wonder if that helps him deal with players going through slumps-- if it changes the way he looks at it and if so how. I think Betemit still has some nice upside, but I don't know how long you give him until you start seriously looking at alternatives. I know one thing, if the Yankees were interested in moving A-Rod, I'd give Hendrickson in a heartbeat, and Betmit, too. <-- That's joking.
3 of 3 I buy beers for every Dodger fan I see Sunday (as long as they are walking).
In a strange way, the baseball schedule played a role in this accident. Had the Cardinals been playing a normal day game where the players would have to show up around 10-10:30, one would hope that Hancock would have been home or at least off the road by 5:00 a.m. Instead the Cardinals had a 7:00 CDT starting time which would be a normal night game in St. Louis.
One more thing, cars/tow trucks whatever, being stopped in the middle of the highway at night is my biggest worry when I am out driving at that time, I am always on the look out for those vehicles.
Pierre's line with runners on: (50 PAs)
.222/.217/.267/.484,
RISP (30 PAs)
.192/.185/.269/.454,
Bases Loaded (8 ABs)
.000 .000 .000 .000
(just kidding!)
In 1990, they swept a 4-game series from Atlanta at home and a 2-game series toward the end of the same season.
that pretty much squares with memory.
"Around 12:30 a.m. Sunday, the tow truck came upon a disabled Geo Prism and stopped behind it with its yellow lights flashing to protect the car."
This accident was totally avoidable, but some irresponsible individual just had to get behind the wheel of a Geo Prism.
Year Home Away Total
1986 5-4 3-6 8-10
1987 6-3 6-3 12-6
1988 7-2 7-2 14-4
1989 5-4 5-2 10-6
1990 7-2 5-4 12-6
1991 5-4 6-3 11-7
1992 5-4 1-8 6-12
1993 3-3 2-5 5-8
1994 0-3 0-3 0-6
1995 3-2 1-3 4-5
1996 3-3 4-2 7-5
1997 2-3 3-3 5-6
1998 1-2 0-6 1-8
1999 2-4 2-1 4-5
2000 1-2 1-5 2-7
2001 2-1 3-1 5-2
2002 2-1 2-1 4-2
2003 1-2 1-2 2-4
2004 2-2 1-2 3-4
2005 1-2 2-1 3-3
2006 1-2 2-1 3-3
During the 1970's and 1980's, the Dodgers won over 60% of the games agaist their Southeast division rivals, more recently, during the Braves long streak of winning division titles, the Dodgers have not fared as well.
1990s . . . 55-68, .447
2000s . . . 22-25, .468
I'm still in Betemit's corner. I know he's a lot better than he's shown himself to be this year, and I'm optimistic he'll break out of his funk.
I have no idea what's going on in the clubhouse or manager's office, of course, but from what I can see, it seems that Little feels the same way. I like the way he's handled WB for the most part.
Will Carroll of UTK/Baseball Prospectus does not expect Schmidt to be back before June.
Here's what I get out of it: even if the subject matter was interesting (it was), and even if Plaschke didn't write anything particularly annoying in addressing the subject (he didn't - not really), the fact is that the man doesn't write well. I read the story thinking, how would a good writer, using no more than Plaschke's notes, have penned the piece? We really are spoiled here at DT.
Last Dodger 3-Game Sweep, at LA - 9/1989
Last Dodger 4-Game Sweep, at LA - 7/1990
Last Dodger 3-Game Sweep, at Atl - 6/1984
Last Dodger 4-Game Sweep, at Atl - 4/1988
No it doesnt.
Beer slows reaction time, which in baseball is a quite necessary trait.
It also dehydrates you, which could lead to cramping, physical exhaustion, etc.
Alcohol does not help athletic performance. I'm really surprised that anyone would actually believe this.
I guess you could suggest Babe Ruth was a great hitter even if drunk/hung over. But how good would he have been had he not drank?
Its like your cheating yourself, your team, and the fans that come to watch you when you deliberately do something that has a negative impact on performance.
Much like musicians, comics, and other people who perform in front of crowds it is possible that many athletes would not be able to handle it without some help in the beginning.
Many people think Mantle could have been the greatest player ever but maybe Mantle couldn't have played at all if he didn't drink due to the pain and shyness that afflicted him. Just saying there is always more then just saying these guys would have been better if they lived perfect lives.
Donnelly was sitting in the dugout as the Pirates third base coach bemoaning the fact that Bream was going to score.
An absurd example: some people play beer pong better after they have been drinking for awhile. Their shots go in because it is muscle memory and the subconscious in control, rather than over thinking the process. This isn't a general phenomenon but it could be a specific one.
I do alot of athletic activites better when I've had a few drinks(billiards,golf,disc golf,anything involving a board and yes ,sunday baseball) and saying no it doesn't relax is just not true otherwise alcohol wouldn't be a billion dollar industry.
Driving under the influence is wrong and a dangerous but the impact alcohol has on an athlete as he performs his sport is case by case.
The effects of alcohol are different for each drinker.
Of course, since the Reds were our chief rivals then, there was Peter Edward Rose, Joe Leonard Morgan, Johnny Lee Bench, etc.
They gave it to him and he went on to give a great performance.
113 - There is parabolic return that peaks at 1-3 drinks and then tapers off to zero as the number approaches infinity.
For a guy who has proven he can hit at the major league level the beer at the very least wouldn't help.
LOL. beer pong, the ulimate sport.
I shouldn't even respond but alcohol is not as popular as it is because it helps people play sports. It's mostly popular because it impairs judgement and that has some effects that people enjoy.
All some pitchers need is the bottle cap off the last bottle of beer another pitcher ever drank before getting on the wagon.
Seriously, you appear to have some access to those closer to the Dodgers and to Baseball in general, especially after the incident with Joe Beimel, how closely should they monitor this type of behavior?
One caveat being, pitchers drinking could be dangerous and thus, I don't support it.
There are bench-clearing brawls all the time in the library.
The longstanding rivalry between the Literature Department and the Acquistions Department makes the Marichal-Roseboro incident look like a game of pat-a-cake.
I can't see it helping much in baseball - anything that impairs your vision or slows your reaction times is not going to help. Maybe in slow-pitch friendly games of softball it's less of a problem (even then, beer didn't help my already poor judgment of fly balls...)
Beer pong is another matter, however. ;-)
Baseball needs another poke in the eye right over alcohol abuse of players and coaches after the steroids mess like Barry Bonds needs to do a commercial for Barcaloungers.
Bud needs to wake up and get together with the players Union to put together a program run by the Union addressing this problem and do it now and publicly. Maybe draft some retired players who have had a substance abuse pasts and get them out to the parks as soon as possible delivering some hard words on the subject coming from the point of view from some guys who have been there, done that and got the livers to prove it.
I'd bet you that all Bud has to do is ask, and the owners will cough up the money to fund a program and some of the retired players would be honored to help the guys in the game today from going where they have been.
In my book, the Players Union would and should get all over this one.
128- I don't think they should monitor it any closer than they do these days. They really do keep an eye on things. I don't know if this is known info or not but the assistant trainer got fired over the Beimel incident because he didn't tell Colletti quickly enough. Again, these are grown men and should be allowed to act as such. And if they behave irresponsibly, it should be and IS addressed.
I was actually trying to be funny. I had NO idea that Donnely was third base coach for the Pirates at that time! I do remember that it was a Bonds throw to the plate. And Bream was pretty funny about the whole thing.
Also that was theyear of the Hansen, Harris, Offerman infield. Pedro's first year, too.
140 Shhh! I TiVo'd it! (I did watch the first few minutes with the hilarious flasher bit.)
Also, when my son fell off a bed as a baby, I took him to the doctor. He saw nothing wrong with him other than a bruise. I asked him how this could be? He said it was because he "fell relaxed." People get injured from falls and crashes in part because they tense up, but because my son fell off the bed unexpectedly, he didn't know enough to tense up. The doctor then went on to say that this is why in crashes between drunk drivers and sober drivers, the drunk is more likely to survive, because he's more relaxed at the point of impact.
I have no idea if that's really true, but it seemed relevant to pass on here.
Don't ever get caught in a dark alley or corner of some aisle in English Literature. The people that hang out there are ruthless.
"Down goes Flaubert! Down goes Flaubert!"
109 My hands are always softer after I've been plinked a couple of times.
As far as baseball being a mental game---I disagree at least as far as hitting is concerned. Hitting IMO is almost entirely reactionary along with the learned muscle memory from thousands upon thousands of swing.
Alcohol can I suppose "relax your mind"--but a relaxed mind doesnt make your bat faster. Vision and timing seem to me to be really important in terms of hitting...and Alcohol impairs both.
Toycannon drew a parallel to musicians. I dont know liqour's effect on vocal chords vs motor skills--I'd believe they hurt motor skills far worse. Plenty of drunk people can still sing, and do--unfortunately.
Yep, I saw that, followed by a bunch of posts seemingly saying that if you're drinking, you're drunk. I just wanted to add to the dissent against that notion.
OK, gotta go, my keg's almost empty.
This is true, but overthinking at the plate can impair timing as much as, if not more than, a beer.
I'm not disagreeing with you, Jon; I was simply objection to the thought that any amount of alcohol makes you drunk. Maybe I'm misreading.
Operating a motor vehicle is inherently dangerous enough to yourself and others that "barely enough to affect most people" is worth trying to prevent.
BAC=.00%: 26,558 fatalities
BAC=.01%-.07: 2,346
BAC>.07 14,539
BAC>.16 9,316
Souce: DOT
However, I think it is possible to assume that there are more people (and miles driven) in the .01%-.07% category than in the >.07% or .16% category. Since the those who are more intoxicated kill more people (most often themselves or people they know) than I think we can assume that the fatality rate is lower for former than it is for the latter.
The greater (statistical) threat to the driving public is not wearing a seatbelt, but that hasn't been puffed up into a moral issue, I guess. Oh, and going too fast...
Per Tony Jackson's blog, the Dodgers have activated then optioned Hong-Chih Kuo to Las Vegas. Still no word on Brazoban so he remains on the DL.
http://tinyurl.com/yro7r6
what the heck is daft?
-an album by Art of Noise ?
-Deleted articles with freaky titles?
-senseless, stupid, or foolish?
Tony Jackson must be the only person in America who has that much affection for Delta Airlines.
I also think this is likely going nowhere because we don't have useful rate stats.
I failed a breathalizer in college because I had just rinsed with Listerine.
I swear I'm not drinking now. The Wilson Bridge is tricky in any state.
My favorite soccer moment was when a guy on my team showed up for Sunday game and immediately started moaning and clutching his sides a minute into the game. I asked him what was wrong. He said, "I had all-you-can-eat Dim Sum this morning." Before the game. Talk about daft!
The Hasselhoff thing - he did that video apparently to show him what he looks like drunk to help him quit drinking. Which could work, except he forgot as a celebrity other people, too, would eventually see that video.
Furcal, SS
Pierre, CF
Nomar, 1B
Gonzo, LF
Martin, C
Ethier, RF
Betemit, 3B
Martinez, 2B
Tomko, P
To echo a comment over there, does anyone know how effective of a hitting coach Murray has been? Is there any way to guage this?
So the Kent-less line-up tonight vs. Smoltz, should be interesting.
I don't know about Murray as a hitting coach or how to gauge it - wondered that last year, too. I think hitting and pitching coaches can get too much blame or credit for how players are performing, but I do wonder if there's not a more effective hitting coach out there somewhere.
197 I liked sparking water, yogurt and mulitvitamins. Now I just don't drink as much.
Hensley is 1-3 this season with a 7.62 ERA (24 ER/28.1 IP) over his first six starts.
Why is the team not doing as well this year, first and most importantly, they have faced the best pitching in the NL on a consistent basis. Second, Raffy Furcal, like last year, is on extended spring training, hopefully he will start producing this month.
Ceratinly 3B remains an issue and more pop in OF would be great but there is nothing I see that the players are doing collectively as a group that would reflect on the hitting coach.
Even a team notorious in early count swingers still ranks in the middle of the league in walks despite no consistent power threat and the Dodgers don't strike out that much either.
Thanks for the context
Eddie Murray is not going to win any popularity contests but I have not noticed anything to say he is the reason why the offense isn't hitting the ball out of the park. That is a player personnel issue.
I will say that Betemit's offense will probably fall under the realm of Murray (both switch hitters, etc.) so that will have to be watched closely, though you have to like Betemit's patience (and as most who have seen a few of his games, he has gotten in bowling terms, tapped a number of times) I am worried about his lack of ability to get the ball in the air, he seems to be hitting mostly ground balls or line drives with no chance of going out.
When I hear word one from Eddie Murray what the Dodger philosophy is on this subject, I will let you know. But I do think from a player development side, it is looked at and worked on.
After a month of baseball that is one ugly line.
Well, the Dodgers had the best offensive output since moving to Los Angeles last year. And with a team that was not expected to do anything of the sort. And the Indians produced offensively when he coached a team full of rookies. So as I pointed out about a week ago, if it's fair to criticize Hatcher for the Angels doing nothing for an extended period, I think Murray deserves at least a little credit.
They were among the league leaders in run scored a week ago and have fallen to the middle mostly based on untimely hitting all week. Really untimely hitting. How many have we left on base? That should wash out in the long run.
Eddie Murray is not the type to the Dodger philosophy on hitting in a crowded movie theater.
Not with the fans (outside of Baltimore) and not with the media. With his teammates? he might.
Remember that when Ripken broke the record he thanked only four people in his speech: His father, mother, wife and Eddie Murray. He said Murray showed him how to be a professional baseball player.
I saw the game when Hensley got hurt and he really did hurt himself.
Does anyone hear one word from Eddie Murray on anything publicly? He's kind of like a monk, I thought.
Eddie Murray talks to a lot of people. He just doesn't talk to the media. And he's not just a guy who will do TV and nothing else. He's an equal opportunity media ignorer.
I am liking him more and more by the minute
Over the winter, Green discovered a flaw in his swing, mechanics he'd developed after surgery he'd never cleared out.
"I haven't felt like this at the plate since my good years in L.A., in terms of seeing the ball and taking pitches," he said. "It's very encouraging. My goal coming into this year was trying to get back to my best years. It's been a month, but it's been a good month.
"It feels good to be in control rather than just be reacting, rather than just trying to squeak out hits."
http://www.nbc10.com/mlb/13260706/detail.html
I thought the consensus last year was that Kuo was better suited to being a starter.
Also, Jason Schmidt enjoyed his first baseball activity since going on the DL more than two weeks ago. The right-hander played catch, making 40 hard throws at a distance of 50-60 feet. Trainer Stan Conte cautioned against reading too much into the development, saying it was just one step in a long process.
I like BA's projected 2010 lineup:
Catcher Russ Martin
First Base James Loney
Second Base Etanislao Abreu
Third Base Andy LaRoche
Shortstop Rafael Furcal
Left Field Andre Ethier
Center Field Juan Pierre
Right Field Matt Kemp
No. 1 Starter Chad Billingsley
No. 2 Starter Jason Schmidt
No. 3 Starter Clayton Kershaw
No. 4 Starter Scott Elbert
No. 5 Starter Brad Penny
Closer Jonathan Broxton
Go visit the Red Schoendienst page.
You can send me something through PayPal.
Off the field Murray was renowned for his refusal to speak to the press. His personal avoidance of the media began in 1979 when a New York columnist wrote a disparaging article about Murray's family, right during the World Series. Murray was so upset by the piece that it seemed to affect his play as the Orioles were defeated by the Pittsburgh Pirates in seven games. After that the mercurial Murray declined almost every interview opportunity. "I don't need to see my name in the paper every day," he explained in a rare Sports Illustrated profile. "I only care what the other players know of me. I let my baseball do the talking."
Though I think the inclusion of Jason Schmidt there seems like wishful thinking...
You touch on the heart of my "Fire Mickey Hatcher" campaign:
http://6-4-2.blogspot.com/2006/06/petulantly-waiting-to-fire-mickey.html
Hatcher is merely the most visible head of the hydra; the problem rests with a player development system that succumbs to a dangerous fatalism about OBP, as though it were somehow a lost, black art whose mastery Angels prospects will never learn, so why bother? That is, Hatcher is in some ways a canary in the coal mine of developmental bad habits. It's one thing to say a player can't be found at a reasonable price who avoids the out; but it's quite another to presume such players cannot be drafted for and created on the farm.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.