Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Wednesday night, I found myself in the unexpected but amusing position of having to convince my 4-year-old daughter that Honus Wagner and Billy Wagner weren't related.
Almost as unexpected and amusing, I was forced to concede I was wrong.
The chat arose from an illustrated kids baseball primer that I bought over the weekend. Though my daughter doesn't have any hostility toward baseball and knows the Dodgers are her team, though she can even name Dodgers and on occasion wax rhapsodically about them, I can't say she shows much interest in watching a game - which is something of an inconvenience if not a disappointment for me, as you can imagine.
So, I bought the book - not intending to force it on her, but hoping it might click with her. To my pleasant surprise - it actually did. We read it Monday night and again Wednesday night. I've taken her to a few baseball games each year, but only now does she know where the bases are and where the fielders stand.
The 16-page book has a smattering of pictures from all eras - Christy Matthewson, Jackie Robinson, Brooks Robinson, Ozzie Smith and even Raul Mondesi trying to beat out an infield hit in a Toronto Blue Jay uniform. To tell you something about the time in which it was published, large pictures of Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds appear with no misgivings. Two pages each are devoted to the overall game, then catcher, pitcher, first base, second base, shortstop, third base and outfield. The book closes with Kenny Lofton chasing a fly ball on the final page, Cleveland Indians-style.
It was my daughter who noticed that two of the players in the book had the same last name, and as far as she was concerned, this meant they were related. Four-year-olds present you with a peculiar brand of intelligence but a firm set of convictions. I tried to explain the concept that people with the same last name weren't necessarily related, but she wasn't buying it.
And for all I knew, maybe the two Wagners, born 97 years apart, share some blood. Given the number of disagreements we face each day, mainly centered on wanting to have such-and-such then-and-there, was I going to make their disparate family trees my last stand? No.
So just so you know, Honus Wagner and Billy Wagner are related.
By coincidence, Wagner the Younger pitched against the Dodgers the night this conversation was taking place, and thanks to TiVo, I had the opportunity to show him to her Thursday. I told her I had a surprise for her, and she got excited.
Then when I showed it to her, she said with a smile of recognition, "Billy Wagner." And then: "That's not a surprise," as in, "That's not a good enough surprise."
Back to the books ...
1 Nick Dougherty -2
2 Angel Cabrera -1
3 Bubba Watson E
T4 Olin Browne +1
T4 Pablo Martin-Benavide +1
T4 Jose Maria Olazabal +1
T4 Tiger Woods +1
Honus and Billy are both from hardscrabble backgrounds. Tracking them through Ancestry.com would be pretty hard.
I thought Honus was a second-generation German immigrant.
When I started following baseball and the Dodgers in '61 I thought Tommy and Willie Davis must be brothers.
I still think Honus, Billy, and their German cousin had a lot to offer the world, despite political differences. The story about Billy that Vin told about him breaking his right arm twice that forced him to throw with his left is a cool story. Not as well known is that his German composer cousin broke his right arm twice also, each time falling from a guard tower at Dachau.
About 10 years ago, I tried to convince my mother that the fact that her maiden name and Troy Percival's were the same was a coincidence. She doggedly insisted that she thought she had heard "little Troy" mentioned years before at a family reunion.
She ended up being right and I ended up annoyed that she was right again.
I can't imagine rooting for the Cubs. Spare that child a lifetime of disappointment (he says as his teams creeps near 20 years without a title).
Where on earth does Vin get some of these stories, I wonder.
But, relating them to 1850s Irish playwrights? That's all Vin.
Most recently my wife brought home two David Wiesner books. If you haven't seen them and you have a 4-6 year old, i highly recommend them. These two are Flotsam and Tuesday. They will appeal especially to former Art Musuem employees.
Also, I wonder if Betemit's recent revival had anything to do with Murray's departure? Along the lines of he quit listening to Murray?
By my cursory inspection of Jon's salary information, we have about $44 million coming off the payroll next year assuming Kent is not offered a contract. That will be offset by about $10 mil of other vets increasing contracts, so we should have a net of about $25-30 million to spend this offseason.
I know from reading a couple of old articles that Vin does a lot of research on the internet. Also, I've always been under the impression that he has a research assistant who will go and interview the players sometimes.
Vin asks. He sits down with the visiting players and gets stories from them. He especially likes players from poor backgrounds.
He seemed disappointed once when he asked Olmedo Saenz about his background and found out that Saenz came from a very wealthy family in Panama.
It just wasn't me. I can tell a very good story but I'm not Vin. I sounded like a pale imitation so I went back to doing play-by-play like every other announcer in the world; reacting to the information rather than acting on it. Vin's the only I know who can do it.
(pause)
Can you tell my kids are taking finals right now and I'm just killing time?
Me too! But it was in 1964
And it was simple things like did the guy have sisters or brothers, what was his major (which is pretty hard to get wrong considering that it appears to me that there are only about 4 majors that players on the team take at UCLA, the only player I can think of who might differ from that is Alteran Verneer)
Of all the players I first read about when I was just a little older than Jon's daughter was Honus Wagner and I am sure that he would have been a favorite of mind if I had seen him play.
i just e-mailed you back TC.
I love Vin. I can't imagine what it will be like when he isn't announcing anymore. I grew up in Chicago with Jack Brickhouse and then Harry and I can't stand to listen to a Chicago broadcast now, it seems all wrong.
I miss Vinnie on east coast trips, but I know we'll get him when we come back west.
I'm not a Lakers fan but liked Chick. I guess icons can't be replaced easily if ever.
My daughter is a bit OCD and we have "Goodnight Moon" everynight. She now says goodnight to everything on the last page to stall. She even has to distinguish between the cow jumping over the crescent moon and the moon in the window. She says goodnight to the books and bunny picture too, they aren't even in the text. She makes a very short book quite long, but it is so totally precious I don't want it to ever stop. I don't even bring up the idea that we have other books we can read at bedtime.
The Bionic Woman. She graduated from the junior high I used to teach at. Washington Irving in Glassell Park, near Eagle Rock.
Richard Ramirez (Night Stalker) was also a graduate.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19235370/
D-Backs leave scouting report on floor, reporter finds after Yankee series. Seems like their scouting report for pitchers didn't work very well.
1 .568
2 .796
3 .866
4 .698
5 .685
6 .698
7 N/A (0)
8 .576
AVG= .698
Dodger: OPS
Furcal .724
Pierre .641
Nomar .651
Kent .795
LuGo .844
Martin .816
Ethier .713
Betemit .837
Avg = .753
We can win with this, no?
that's what i sense also, but reading Bobs post i guess he still does his own research.
I believe Vin does rely a lot on the producer of the telecast. He usually thanks the guy by name.
EDWARD GRANT BARROW
CLUB EXECUTIVE, MANAGER, LEAGUE
PRESIDENT IN MINORS AND MAJORS FROM
1894 TO 1945.
CONVERTED BABE RUTH FROM PITCHER TO OUTFIELDER AS MANAGER BOSTON A.L. IN 1918.
DISCOVERED HONUS WAGNER AND MANY OTHER GREAT STARS.
WON WORLD SERIES IN 1918. BUILT NEW YORK YANKEES INTO OUTSTANDING ORGANIZATION IN BASEBALL AS BUSINESS MANAGER FROM 1920 TO 1945, WINNING 14 PENNANTS, 10 WORLD SERIES.
but I'm wondering whether you guys see any horrific parallels (as I do) between Billingsley and Pedro. You know--young, promising Dodger middle reliever proceeds to be traded for a solid-but-unspectacular hitter who plays a couple years in a Dodger uniform before moving on, while said "middle reliever" becomes a great starter elsewhere... if anything we're fortunate that Billingsley doesn't have the same physical concerns that Pedro did, which makes it more likely that Ned will see him as a starter, but I'm still worried. Anyone else?
Reportedly noticed a boy had 3 dead squirrels but no gun. Inquired. Was told the boy threw rocks to kill them and knock them out of trees.
Figured boy had future as pitcher.
Story has good description of the double no-no, mentions legendary Jim Thorpe, who played a role in its outcome.
http://www.nashvillesounds.com/news/news.asp?newsId=2344
I'm not concerned in the slightest that Billingsley will be traded for Troy Glaus (for example).
46 I wouldn't read too much into it. The Padres offense is just as bad as ours (and ours is getting better), and their pitching has got to come down to earth at some point. That kid they brought up from AAA can't spot a 2.00 ERA all year.
Pedro was an oddball case that will never happen again. I mean, he's the greatest pitcher in baseball history, by far. What are the odds that Chad Billingsley, if we trade him, will turn into the greatest pitcher of all time? Probably pretty slim. I'm not too worried about it. Colletti so far has shown that he has a pretty good sense of which prospects he should trade (Guzman, Navarro, Jackson, Tiffany) and not trade (Kemp, Broxton, Martin, etc).
My wife tells me to stop telling it, but I do love it so.
Hmmm.... if Schmidt has trouble again tomorrow, do we go to DJ Houlton before Bills? I imagine we might. Bills isn't stretched out enough. But he can get there if given a shot. He might only go five the first time out, but if he does enter the rotation, then I don't think at this point in the season we send him to AAA to make a few starts. He belongs in the bigs and I still think the plan might be to plug him into the starting five before we are done with the season.
Should we get into the playoffs, we don't need more than four starters and it is obvious we'd go with the four most effective in Sept.
My worst joke just to make you feel better:
Why does Snoop Dogg always carry an umbrella?
Answer: (I apologize ahead of time)
Fo' drizzle.
Not worried. Chad will be with us for a while. If Elbert had done his natural progression instead of surgery and Schmidt hadn't developed his problems then I'd be worried but I think the last thing they would do is deal Chad since he's next in line and that call could come any time.
Made me laugh, I always wanted to busta move on LeAnn.
I hope who ever is closing for them now doesnt blow up.
When did this happen?
So you seriously think DePo was going to trade Penny/Billingsley for 2 months of Randy Johnson?
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1848013
Would be an interesting household to have your kids become Giant fans. I think that indicator alone would signal some very tough teenage years as the rebellion gene would be very very strong.
In my case, my son identifies much more with his Bay Area cousins than with me. The three kids up there are fanatical Giant fans. Every picture I have of them from the past 7 years, at least one of them is wearing Giants' gear. They are indefatigable. And so my son, sniff, goes along with it.
It's a tolerable problem because my son really isn't into baseball that much. I'm much more likely to get my wife to watch a game with me than him. He likes going to Dodger Stadium because he thinks it's a beautiful place, and they sell things he likes to eat.
http://tinyurl.com/37gzqc
i happen to do that a lot also, Than you come off as some giggling idiot or something.
I hear there are camps you can send them to. They say they can "fix" it, but I don't know...Maybe some cult-deprogramming or something.
It's the kind of stuff you only think happens to other people.
that's starring at Ned right in the face, but if Kemp figues it out in the outfield we can put Pierre in LF & Kemp in CF right?
63 - "homophones" perhaps?
I am with the scout on this one.
It's not your fault.
It's not your fault.
It's not your fault.
Denial is a wonderful thing.
Just letting you know.
from what i've read he trully does his homework on the hitters cople that with a 92-94MPH fastball,splitter (or 2 seamer?) & a slider with pin point control & wah lah!
ps he seams to hide the ball really well also cause the hitters are very late on his pitches it seems. my 2 cents i could be wrong.
See, that's good news.
I'm not positive, but seems to me pre-acquisitive little girls are about the most enjoyable beings on the planet to speak with, their quirky and spontaneous little dances to observe.
Not to risk coals on previous fires, but tuned to Red Sox/Rockies on MLB last night, and Drew was up, bottom sixth, two on, one out, I think, and I said to mate, "Watch J.D. take a called third here with chance to get Sox back in game. He does it time after time." J.D. takes the called third on next pitch. Mate, one of those previously-mentioned little darlin's (who, at least to
now, God Bless, has never gone thru the acquisitive phase) is an honorable sort, and so, when re-telling the tale of my magnificent prescience, will not distort my testimony by saying, "...and he had just finished saying Drew does that all the time..."
May all the Little Girls (and their Fathers) grow up students of the game, wiser for its general lessons, and unfettered by overwhelming and limiting devotion to the generally shallow and way-unfinished little boys who play it....
The Penny part, I'm not sure about. Billinsgley I do know he tried to trade. Billingsley told me that management even called him to notify him he was being traded. Then the deal fell through.
So I have searched long and hard for another instance of a person named Honus and another named Billy sharing a last name. I understand that Honus' real first name was John, but that would have been no fun.
Anyway, there is a fellow named Honus Schmiege who pitches in the CBL. In 2002, he even tossed a no-hitter against the Toronto Turtles. Furthermore, I did stumble upon some references to a William Schmiege, but could not find a working link.
Also, I do have a lot of time on my hands.
from dodgers.com.--
Saito closed for two seasons in Japan and had 47 saves, but he said he's now a better pitcher at age 37 than he was there with a younger arm.
"Over here, being in the Major Leagues has brought something out of me I didn't know I had," he said. "It's raised my game to another level. Why I didn't play this way in Japan, I don't know. Maybe it was the competition."
So he can't explain it very well either.
There's talk from time to time how Tomko and Lurch can't get it together because it just doesn't happen to plus-30 pitchers. Well, it did for Sammy, and he has a few on both of them.
But it's very unlikely for the other two. Lurch probably gets about all out of his ability that could be expected. Tomko is another matter, with his "stuff."
But he seems to be his own worst enemy. For whatever reasons, Tomko's destinty seems to be the Hall of Mediocrity.
I was trying to find LA's top-10 prospect list before and after 2004, but to no avail. If anyone has access to that, it might be an interesting list to revisit.
Sorry for being snarky, but how does trying to trade Billz preety much prove anything? Did Logan White declare Billingsley untradeable at any cost? Wasn't Billingsley exactly the type of prospect you would trade to acquire an ace for a playoff bound team? If I recall, and I could be wrong, he was behind Jackson and Miller as the #3 pitching prospect for the Dodgers. That's untouchable?
I sometimes wonder about Vin's ability to find obscure trivia. But I think that one takes the cake. Kudos...
1. Joel Guzman, ss
2. Chad Billingsley, rhp
3. Edwin Jackson, rhp
4. James Loney, 1b
5. Andy LaRoche, 3b
6. Russell Martin, c
7. Greg Miller, lhp
8. Blake DeWitt, 3b
9. Jonathan Broxton, rhp
10. Chuck Tiffany, lhp
This was the beginning of Greg Miller's freefall. And JtD, we do miss you.
I laughed at the Busta/Leann joke too, but now I'm a little ashamed to admit it.
from that list, it seems to be a 50% success rate...
I was never a huge fan of DePo, but he certainly was right about trading for a difference-making pitcher for the playoffs. I know that Penny did not work out that year, but Johnson would have been a great acquisition at the time.
20
Eric, I thought I read in Simers article yesterday that the option for next year is mutual, but now that I think about it, I remember something about a PA provision in there too. Can anyone out there shed light on Kent's contract?
Is DeWitt still considered a prospect for us? What level is he at now?
I read it too, actually. And I know he quoted Kent saying it, but... he's wrong.
"The deal contains a $9 million team option for 2008 with a $500,000 buyout, and the option would become guaranteed if he has 550 plate appearances in 2007."
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2388812
>>> All indications are that Hu will move up to Las Vegas soon - possibly around the time of next month's All-Star break. A September major-league callup probably is a long shot for Hu, who still isn't on the Dodgers' 40-man roster and doesn't have to be until next spring. <<<
http://www.presstelegram.com/sports/ci_6145323
I think DeWitt is still in Jacksonville...
There's a team option should he fail to reach that PA figure for $7M.
I hear that Clemens guy is pretty good...
He loves this story because it represents how one can turn failure into success. His dream had always been to play in the MLB, and quite likely, if he didn't fail at the plate, may have remained a light-hitting SS in Japan.
He sounded pretty despondent yesterday in the article. I wonder if Kent will retire this offseason despite the time left on his contract...
That said, we still have the means to make a huge splash in the offseason and replace our spare parts (Anderson, Martinez, Tomko) with cheaper, better, younger players.
I also hear there is a guy with a double chin and a poorly fitting uni in San Diego who strung some pretty good seasons together with the Braves in the '90s.
Laroche
Bell
Meloan
Hu
Mattingly
Mcdonald
Paul
Withrow
Lambo (i think hes going to have a pretty good opening season)
I will toss out a couple of numbers.
Career leaders in ERA+. One of these is not like the others:
1. Pedro Martinez 160
2. Lefty Grove 148
3. Walter Johnson 146
3. Dan Quisenberry 146
3. Hoyt Wilhelm 146
3. Joe Wood 146
7. Ed Walsh 145
8. Roger Clemens 144
9. Jim Devlin 143
9. Johan Santana 143
I grew up in West TN 80 miles or so from Memphis but don't get back that way much. It's not that far from Nashville but just doesn't seem to happen.
I hope to take in a game there sometime and stop off at the Rendezvous for ribs. Couldn't miss a chance at that.
... With Tomko, it's pitch-to-pitch concentration that's lacking. Brett reminds me of another Dodger pitcher; a guy they got in the 90s from Minnesota. Not Trombley, just a sec -- ah, there he is. Willie Banks. GREAT stuff, and his first several starts were OK. But his concentration and focus would fall off at various points in his starts, and he ended up getting sent off to Florida after only 6 or 7 starts for the Dodgers.
the shoulder surgery is a setback.
the outcome of shoulder surgeries are far more unpredictable then TJ surgery.
1. Kershaw
2. Loney (still technically a prospect: 120 PA)
3. LaRoche
4. Meloan
(This is where it gets tricky)
5. Elbert
6. Hu
7. Bell
8. Withrow
9. McDonald
10. Mattingly
Can't agree. Randy was still an ace. Chad was just a 20 year old who could become an ace. Some of those guys visit Dr Andrews. Just ask Mr. Elbert.
Loneys definately going to pass prospect status. so who would you put at 10 since everyone else moves up a spot?
hes awesome. there really isnt much else to say.
Here's an excerpt of a 2002 article on BP by Keith Woolner and Jonah Keri, in which they tried to settle the argument of who's the greatest living pitcher:
Let's whittle out the pretenders first.
It's not Randy Johnson or Pedro Martinez. Though each can claim one of the top peaks in history, neither has shown enough longevity to rival the very best. Check back in 2005 or so and we'll see how far they've progressed.
It's not Steve Carlton or Tom Seaver. Both fare well in both career and peak rankings, just not well enough.
Guys like Phil Niekro and Don Sutton lag behind the leaders by a fair margin.
Nolan Ryan apologists have little to stand on. Ryan's noted longevity amounted to only the 19th all-time rank in career VALUE. You won't find him anywhere in the top peaks list.
We're down to Spahn, Maddux and Clemens.
We'll let Spahn duel with Carlton for Best Living Lefty status. Spahn's 18th rank in peak VALUE negates his top spot in career VALUE.
So, Maddux or Clemens?
Clemens' peak VALUE wins by 0.139. Maddux's career VALUE wins by 0.274. Too close to call.
However, Clemens edges Maddux in career RA+, RAA and RAR, falling short only in innings totals, which netted him the lower career VALUE total.
So by the slimmest of margins, we'll take Clemens.
But with Maddux three and a half years Clemens' junior and the Rocket's durability finally taking a hit this year, Maddux's future ranking looks a little brighter. He could pass Clemens as early as next season, or toward the end of the duo's careers.
http://tinyurl.com/366qct
i've also heard he had back issues for a while in Japan.
1) Edwin Jackson
2) Greg Miller
3) Franklin Gutierrez
4) James Loney
5) Joel Hanrahan
6) Chad Billingsley
7) Xavier Paul
8) Andy LaRoche (listed as "2B/SS")
9) Koyie Hill
10) Reggie Abercrombie
BA had them ranked #2 out of 30 teams.
Is it wrong that I'm watching "The Natural" on Women's Entertainment network?
Would we give up what was then some very unproven prospects for a serious run at the World Series? I can respect either answer to that question, but for me it's a definite yes.
What about Lucas May?
Or not. Rocket added a Cy Young in '04 (when Unit was robbed) and a 3rd place in '05.
Meanwhile Maddux has...well, pitched better than Jeff Weaver, I guess. He hasn't posted an era+ higher than 113 since '02.
And Randy Johnson has been a pretty dominant starter for about 17 years now. I think we can stop discrediting him for not doing it long enough.
Bryan Morris is another guy who could jump back onto these lists next year.
i just looked at his #'s & i think he's had a great 16 year run but i pretty much agree with your thoughts. when you think about it he had great offense to back him up with seattle & NY or else we could probably shorten his great years to probably 12 to 14 great years.
Warning: Do not read this post if you have never read "The Natural" by Bernard Malamud.
.
.
I once had the opportunity to talk to Mark Johnson, who produced "The Natural." I said, "You know, I have a friend who calls that the best book-to-movie change of all time."
He said (and I'm paraphrasing), "Early on, we were at a story meeting at the studio. We got to the end of the story -- he's at the plate, he's bleeding... he looks into the stands... he swings, and the umpire calls, 'Strike Three,' and we fade to black."
He paused, then said, "You could hear a pin drop."
I mean, check out the list in post 142. Any of those guys you'd trade now for one of the top pitchers in the league? About half of them have shown they may never be productive major leaguers. And Bills, as much as he impresses me, is still hardly a sure thing even now, never mind 3 years ago.
>>> There is a strong possibility the new hitting coach will be someone already employed by the organization. Roving minor-league hitting instructor Bill Robinson, triple-A Las Vegas hitting coach Mike Easler and roving outfield/baserunning coordinator Gene Clines all would be logical candidates. Although neither Colletti nor Little mentioned any of them by name, it was obvious from one Colletti comment that he and Little are leaning strongly in the direction of the club's player development department. <<<
http://www.dailybreeze.com/sports/articles/8012887.html
so ... your 2009 la dodgers
furcal
paul
kemp
loney
laroche
martin
ethier
abreu
it's morning at chavez ravine!
Who did Pierre get traded for?
it wasn't a trade, we actually threw money at him.
>>> Given his history, it's difficult to understand how the Dodgers could be shocked by Murray's inability to communicate with individual players, or their failure to seek him out. <<<
http://www.dailybreeze.com/sports/articles/8013877.html
i feel you Canuck.
164 i've been telling anybody that will listen that ned should be talking to furcal about extending NOW.
Will he allow to be extended for less money than he's currently making? If not, would you want Furcal making another $13M per year for a few more years? Furcal's annual salary only makes sense if it's for the short term. Extending him defeats the purpose.
I will accept that the answer to that question might be "yes" and thus would be worthy of an extension.... just would like to hear the case made.
Agreed, Randy Johnson wasn't a sure thing back then, but there weren't many things surer. How often has he taken the mound in the playoffs and NOT been dominant?
Anyway, I respect your point. I would still trade a little distant future for a bigger slice of October, under the right circumstances. 18 years is getting tough to stomach.
There's a guy in Texas with 7 no-hitters--18 years from first to last--and 5714 strikeouts who probably thinks he belongs higher in great pitcher discussions. But he doesn't seem to get a lot of props in them.
I used to think that if I had to put together an all-time rotation for one season--pitchers at their peaks--it'd probably be Koufax, Ryan, Unit, Clemens, Pedro, and Carlton (not necessarily in that order after Koufax). Still kind of like that group on that basis.
Three lefties, three righties for balance. Yeah, yeah, it's a six-man rotation. So?
There'd be a whole lot of hitters who wouldn't argue much after they faced it. That group would strike out unimaginable numbers and probably have equally astounding numbers for fewest hits allowed.
And yeah, I know some stats might not agree. Usual YMMV disclaimer.
Furcal, SS
Pierre, CF
Nomar, 1B
Kent, 2B
Gonzo, LF
Martin, C
Betemit, 3B
Kemp, RF
Lowe, P
I think the time/space continuum just ruptured.
not last year and the second half of 2005 when he basically hit a brick wall when he advanced to A+ ball.
Perez is already 22 which is old for A-ball but he is a switch hitter and he is hitting for power. He should probably be promoted to Inland Empire pretty soon.
"Oh, you're starting. On the bench, but you're still starting"
yes.
Nor should he. Ryan belongs nowhere near a discussion of history's greatest pitchers. History's most intimidating pitchers, absolutely. History's most unique pitchers, definitely. History's greatest pitchers, not on your life. Look at his actual record. Even if you're arguing for the value of his longevity, Ryan only had 12 full seasons as an outstanding pitcher (110 ERA+ or better). Bert Blyleven, just to pick one guy at random, had 14.
Other than all-time stats, there's probably not much way to compare today's guys with the era of Walter Johnson, Cy Young, Christy Mathewson, etc.
Those guys may have been just as good as the ones I named. But as time goes on and athletes get better and better, I'd think the edge probably would go to the more modern guys--if that better-and-better process has gone on since the sports began.
Be great to have a time machine and plug in a few of them along with Ruth and Cobb and a few others in today's MLB and see what would happen.
bell 1-2
mattingly 2-2 2rbi
van slyke 2-2 2b, hr 4rbi
We try to make a half-dozen or so day games every summer --San Luis (Obispo) Blues. Cheap and fun.
-fp
Lizarraga, Francisco
Santana, Carlos
Guerrero, Pedro
Paul, Xavier
Lundberg, Spike
Norrito, Giuseppe
Villalobos, Andrick
Hey Nate, what's your take on Van Slyke? Still a legit prospect?
His slugging percentage for the year is creeping. By the end of today it very well might be higher than Nomars. Entering tonight he is down a point .331 to .332
But he is slugging 100 points+ higher than Nomar in June .341 to .225.
The van air brushed man has 3 extra base hits in his last 42 games.
I know alot of you guys have preached patience (toycannon), but how much longer??
definately. 6'5 195lbs, the power has a good chance of coming on in a year or two.
Yeah, if I had reviewed the pitchers he'd be on the list.
But a couple of them probably belong in that kind of group also.
http://www.beloblog.com/Pe_Blogs/baseball/dodgers/
Gentle readers, the comments on my blog violate several Dodger Thoughts rules, including, but not limited to, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 11.
Rule 9, so far, has not been violated.
Until Pierre starts hitting line drives and occcassionally walking, he must bat 8th. Get on, let pitcher take pitches to steal and/or bunt...last 3 innings pinch hit/double switch.
Too obvious.
And until Nomar hits for power, drop him down the lineup. Or Play his "defensive back up" much more.
Over a season, the top 3 or 4 hitters get many more ABs. Thats why your best hitters should bat at the top of the lineup.
Let Nomar and Pierre hit their way back, like Betemit is doing...
I've preached patience but I would have moved him out of the 3 hole weeks ago. Really no way to sugarcoat how bad he's been, why he is still hitting 3rd is a mystery. Even more of a mystery since Kemp is up. I'd want to get him as many at bats as I could.
I understand why everyone is tired of him, who wouldn't be, he's terrible right now. I have more faith that the lot of you will be telling me "I told you so" then the other way around. Just trying to keep the faith that he's not pulling a Brett Boone on me.
Unfortunately, there is a way to sugarcoat it, and that's probably why he's still batting there. He's "driving in runs." He's "hitting with runners in scoring position." He's "helping his team win."
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.