Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Look, the outfield walls should be as safe as they can be. No one should have to point this out. That's all there is to say about that.
As for whether James Loney should have been in right field to begin with, here are my thoughts, nursed overnight:
Should Loney play first ahead of Nomar (Garciaparra)? Maybe. But given that Nomar is playing first, should an agile fielder and superb athlete be prevented from trying another position? It doesn't make sense. Loney isn't a crystal doll.
Loney's collision with the wall Sunday was a fluke. The impact of that collision might not have been a fluke, but the collision itself was. Loney is a good athlete who has been practicing in the outfield for some time now, and he stumbled in the wrong place.
For his part, Garciaparra picked the right day to have three hits - otherwise the anger and the calls to bench him would be even greater. That being said, I have to admit I'm impressed that no one blamed Loney's injury on Brett Tomko.
Meanwhile, given the plight of the Dodgers against the Angels over the weekend, Bill Plunkett of the Register had the lead of the day, topping his Dodger-Angel gamer with: "As an outfielder, James Loney made a better metaphor."
The good news, though, is that after Sunday's game and his hard collision with the wall, Loney was walking around the Dodger clubhouse "unaided," according to Gregg Patton of the Press-Enterprise:
Part-timer Loney saw another reason besides statistics to look forward to the road trip: The designated hitter.
"I saw it on the schedule and thought it might be a good opportunity for some of us to get some at bats," he said.
A few minutes later, he walked out of the clubhouse, pretty much wrapping up the good news portion of the day for the Dodgers.
Patton said that Loney's injury "was being described as a bruise, pending an X-ray later Sunday."
* * *
The stat no one can stop quoting: Heading to Toronto, the Dodgers have lost 20 of their past 21 interleague road games.
* * *
Bill Shaikin of the Times pushed for Chad Billingsley to take Jason Schmidt's rotation spot.
In the late innings, (Billingsley) cranked up his arm and dominated. In his last 25 innings, he has 30 strikeouts, seven walks and a 1.07 ERA.
Relievers tend to streamline their repertoire, eliminating their third and fourth pitches. As a starter-in-waiting, Billingsley has not.
"I could go out there and just throw fastballs and curves, because they're my best pitches," he said. "If I don't go out there and throw my changeup at all, I'm not going to have it."
The Dodgers could return Mark Hendrickson or Brett Tomko to the rotation, but they don't need another five-inning pitcher at a time Randy Wolf appears to be turning into one.
Billingsley has not thrown more than 53 pitches this season. He said he could give the Dodgers 70 in a first start and build from there. That could be good enough for Little, should the Dodgers replace Schmidt. ...
"He'll be one of the future fixtures here, as a starter," pitching coach Rick Honeycutt said. "We'll get everybody's head together and see if we feel this is the right time."
It is.
Update: Schmidt is going on the disabled list, according to Inside the Dodgers, and Marlon Anderson is being activated.
* * *
The Times has made the savvy step of hiring a trilingual beat writer to cover the Dodgers next season, reports Kevin Roderick of L.A. Observed.
Dylan Hernandez of the San Jose Mercury News (yet another import from Ned Colletti's old turf ... although he actually grew up down here) is fluent in Spanish, Japanese, and, although it isn't mentioned specifically, I'm guessing English.
Hernandez graduated from UCLA only five years ago, but like I've said, language skills are the No. 1 thing I'd pursue if I were still trying to be a baseball writer.
You'll see Hernandez's name in the paper in a few weeks, but he'll take over the beat full-time after the 2007 season.
* * *
Ken Landreaux, "This is your life!"
Looks like I missed some weekend of Dodger baseball. But you gotta figure, if the Nationals can take 1 out of 3 from T.O., the Dodgers can at least get 2.
And we miss Halladay.
http://tinyurl.com/2d5pu7
I'm not sure that names should ever begin "Svrl"
Full Name: Adolfo J. Gonzalez
Born: 06/13/1985
Birthplace: Caracas, Venezuela
Height: 5' 11"
Weight: 160
Bats: R
Throws: R
Currently starting 2nd baseman for our Low A team.
The Dodgers do miss out on James Shields this weekend, but they do get Scott Kazmir.
I noticed Hu had a nice bame including a double and a triple. I'm pretty sure he will be a major leaguer, and SS at that.
But I was surprised he was listed at 5'11" and 190 this year. I could of sworn up to last year he was 150 lb. with a frame that won't accomodate much more. He must be following Abreu's example and bulking up. It seems to work. I remember Hu and Abrue coming up the system together as a defensive "show"!
vr, Xei
But probably not.
Defense:
Loney > Nomar
Offense:
Loney > .662 OPS
Everyone knows it's not Tomko's.
It's all Pierre's fault.
So much for getting Bluebleeder one of those novelty license plates with his name on it. You know like they sell at Disneyland and other amusement parks?
My wife has me working on it, by the 21st I'll be able to say it with a flourish.
1) They should do away with the stupid plexigas-"protected" LCD screens on the left and right field fences. This actually may even have less to do with the potential to hurt outfielders and more to do with the fact that they are annoying and not as useful as, say, displaying the scores of other games around the league...but either way they shouldn't be there.
2) Generally, I think we should get Loney into the lineup however we can. I love seeing this guy hit and however that happens is fine with me. I'm glad he's finally with the big club. That said, Grady, I don't know if I see him as a late-inning "defensive replacement" in the outfield...
3) I should go on a date with Alyssa Milano. Short of the vegetarian thing, I think we could work.
That third one may have been a bit of a stretch, but after reading her latest post, I've never been more sure that we would get along...but maybe I'm only dreaming.
Vegetarians taste better. At least, that's what bumper stickers tell me.
Such is life with only 4 "real" OF's on the roster.
27 - Ick.
Fredo/Player & Merchandise Seller Nomar: Combined 145 OPS+
Cheeseburger lover Miguel Cabrera: 144 OPS+
Also, ItD reports Schmidt to the DL and Anderson called up.
"No one ever found truth by reading a bumper sticker. (Trust me, its true.)"
http://www.mercurynews.com/giants/ci_6167871?nclick_check=1
Barry Bonds: "I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."
(Note: I took the quote out of context to make the joke work.)
Yes, that's very true.
If the Dodgers had Pujols at first, I wouldn't have as much of a problem ( or any problem ) with trying Loney in the outfield. Well, at least Loney isn't being tried a bit in the outfield because Jason Phillips needs time at first base.
I hope the outfielders will heed these two examples of Loney and Kemp and start playing a bit more carefully out there with those unpadded bits of wall.
"Chris Cates, SS, University of Louisville
For the first time in history, the University of Louisville baseball team is in the College World Series, and one of the team's fan favorites is shortstop Chris Cates. A senior player who is the ultimate definition of non-toolsy grinder, Cates is hitting .298/.353/.371 for the Cardinals with 17 stolen bases and just 16 strikeouts in 248 at-bates. The Twins made him a 38th-round pick, and he'll start a pro career once his team is done in Omaha. Cates helped the team stave off elimination on Sunday with a 3-for-5 performance in a 12-4 win-or-go-home game against Mississippi State. Now comes the interesting part-Cates is five-foot-three. In terms of shear physicality, Dustin Pedroia looks more like standing next to him. The odds of his ever reaching the big leagues are long, as Harry Chappas and Yo-Yo Davalillo represent the only players with Cates' size to have played in the majors (non-Gaedel division) in the postwar era, but lets root for him anyway"
"The Dodgers made what looked like a questionable pick at the time by taking Mattingly in the supplemental part of last year's first round, but after an impressive showing in the Gulf Coast League last summer, as decisions go, it seemed sound. The spitting image of his father Don (plus three inches and 20 pounds), Mattingly got off to a horrible start in his pro debut, sitting at just .192/.241/.273 in mid-May. Drafted as a shortstop, but given no shot by scouts to stay there, the organization felt that Mattingly's defensive struggles--including an incredibly awful .773 fielding percentage--were affecting him at the plate. They moved him over to second base, and not only has Mattingly made just four errors since moving to the other side of the bag, but he's hit .349/.379/.578 since the move, now sitting at a respectable .265/.300/.400 and rising. Even at second base he's fringy with the glove, and most see him as a left fielder in the end, but the bat is back."
I know everyone loves middle infielders with pop and are hesitant to move them because of the increased value they have but frankly if a guy is going to be an outfielder when he advances, why not start him there when the games really don't matter.
it raced threw my mind though. i really hope him & Hendy get package in a trade.
It's the head-scratchers at the time that drive you crazy. Dreifort, our current CF, etc. Ned gets a pass on Schmidt, as far as I'm concerned.
Because that is just Goldsteins' position not the Dodgers. However whenver I've read what outside scouts say they are usually right. They were right about Scott Hairston, D Young and numerous other players in low A who couldn't handle 2nd base but didn't get a position change until AAA. The explanation I've always heard is that they need to give them a chance because if the bat can play in the infield then the value of that player is much more then as an outfielder and anyone can learn the outfield. Just ask James Loney:)
Among the worst in result or among the worst in forseeable disastrousness?
If Schmidt wasn't able to ever really pitch at all effectively over the three years, then it would be among the worst in results. But could it fairly be said that Ned should have forseen that sort of disaster?
In the case of Pierre, it's looking like a disaster, and it could easily have been forseen, as well.
There is a lot of competition for worst deal ever handed out by the Dodgers. The Perezez, especially Carlos, the Dreifort deal ... the Park deal ( oh wait, that was Texas thank goodness )
I am surprised that it was Anderson being activated only because it does create a middle relief hole if Chad starts on Thursday (which I think he should).
Since Hendrickson and Tomko have not seen time in a close game since being sent back to the bullpen, I would think that would mean Seanez/Beimel are now the 6th/7th inning guys with Broxton and Saito closing up shop.
But with Kuo and Chad pitching back to back, I would think that they would need another arm for backup.
I guess Anderson is being recalled in case Loney needs to go on the DL (maybe they won't know that until tomorrow) They can certainly survive tomorrow with the current pitching staff.
I believe Kip Wells is healthy and available from the Cardinals at a bargain price.
Main reason to put Loney in at that point in the game was the double switch allowed us to bring in Tomko and not burn another pitcher in the next inning because Tomko was put into the 7th slot where Kemp was hitting.
Some on DT think Grady was conceding the game but I think he was getting another at bat for someone other than a pitcher. We were down but not out (yet) when Tomko was put in.
Loney and Repko and other young players need to learn that when they are out to impress, they have to play hard but not reckless. Repko could have stopped us from signing Pierre if he was around last year after getting off to such a hot start. Instead, he never got a shot to play. Ethier might not ever had the time to play either if Repko doesn't scale center field wall and ruin his ankle on a ball that wasn't close to being caught.
Loney should know better than to go all out while going toward the warning track, he has to be able to establish where he is in the field and go from there. I hope Kemp learned from this too after his shoulder injury proved to be minor compared to what it could have been.
While the walls should be padded as best as possible, to lay this at McCourt's feet is wrong. To blame Grady is wrong too. A major leaguer who wants to remain a major leaguer needs to use decent judgement. That and the fact that injuries and accidents will happen.
Ironically, I was at the game Friday and Shaun Livingston threw out the first pitch. Maybe he was contagious? He was taking pics with Chris Withrow too, hope that kid isn't doomed now that he's been infected with Clipper juice.
I think they just took Stan Conte at his word. He said Schmidt was sound and they signed him. The Cubs and Mariners were after him too.
I think it was a good signing at the time and if he gets healthy, will help us. It didn't block others like the Pierre signing and there isn't a huge crop of pitchers going free agent next year. There are three CF though. Good ones. Although Tori Hunter went down yesterday.
As far as signings go, Slappy was not a good one because of the options we had and will have and the length of the contract. If Schmidt gets hurt, we'll get some insurance money. Pierre has never been on the DL. Where's Tonya Harding's ex living?
I dont think pitchers just throw into a radar gun at will like a football player running the 40. They are pretty strictly regimented in throwing schedules and even report to spring 2 weeks before position players for proper arm conditioning before they air out their best. My understanding is Conte's blessing was on the Schmidt deal and no one in the planet knows Schmidt's situation better them him... so this might just be blame-less bad luck. Hopefully we get something from him in August.
Which Dodger problems do you rank above Pierre?
I'd say that's a pretty big problem.
Schmidt.
Wolf- fading fast/lasting 5 INN
Tomko is still on the team.
Nomar's Power is MIA
3rd base (the rumors of Betemit's resurrection may be exaggerated).
Ethier at the plate.
Kent in the field.
etc...
The loss of the Cool-a-coo is definitely a bigger problem then Pierre. The replacement level ice cream sandwich thing we have now just isn't cutting it. ;)
I think 3B is a bigger problem...but I'm not sure if the problem has more to do with a lack of offense from that position or the team's lack of commitment to make a decision there.
I think that the right side of our infield is a bigger problem. I think it's safe to say that more consistent production is expected from Kent/Nomar than we have seen. I don't profess to know the answer, but can Abreu/Loney be much worse?
Schmidt's problems have got to be up there. Sure, our pitching is deep, but why test how deep? I think that Tomko and Hendrickson just being on the roster is a bigger problem.
I hate making this kind of list because I think the list of positives is so much longer and I'm usually not one to dwell on the problems. Still, while JP is a thorn in the side of our lineup, he's not the only one.
Saito
Penny
Lowe
Furcal (defense only)
1. Pierre's presence on the roster.
2. Pierre is the only CFer (sorry Kemp) in the organization, thus guaranteeing his playing time.
3. Little's insistence on batting him 1st or 2nd (with the exception of that short term demotion to #8).
4. Nomar not hitting.
5. Nomar in the 3-slot when playing.
After that, it's mostly getting Schmidt and Furcal healthy and Billingsley into the rotation. But Pierre is the source of the top 3 problems for this team, as far as I'm concerned.
My point in simple terms:
1. pad the wall better
2. accidents and injuries are part of life
3. young players should temper their enthuisiasm to impress with a need to remain healthy in order to play
4. it wasn't Grady's fault for putting Loney in with a double switch
I think Pierre is a glaring problem that is at the root of the offensive struggles of the team. Nomar and Kent are looking sluggish and Russell looks worn down to me, he should have sat on Sat rather than Sunday. Grady had the guts to put Pierre in the 8 slot for two nights, he should return there for now. And he should rest Martin once a week.
The discussion was on whether or not Schmidt was the worst signing and my point was that it wasn't, Pierre was. Pierre bashing? I guess. I consider it Ned bashing. And now Grady's problem for not dealing with it as a manager.
With the lack of offense this past weekend, I'd hope we see Pierre dropped in the order and rested at least once in Toronto. Kemp, Kemp, Kemp, Kemp, and for good measure KEMP! He can lead us to the promised land.
Kind of funny since Nomar and Pierre hit 0.333 in the (completely embarrassing) Angles series.
Pun intended? His power is indeed Hamm-like.
Also, I saw Loney almost run into a tarp in Nashville. So, he was getting playing time in RF, and unless the ball is hit at you there's always a chance of getting injured.
Alex Ochoa (OF) 6/18/2007
Ochoa has signed a deal to play with the Hiroshima Carp of Japan's Central League for the rest of this season. Ochoa, who has played in Japan for the last four years, signed a spring NRI deal with the Red Sox over the winter, but he was released out of Triple-A in May.
Here are the raw totals for the 254 starters:
Draft, High School: 78 30.7%
Draft, College: 96 37.8%
Draft, JUCO 28 11.0%
FA Latin America 48 18.9%
FA Asia 4 1.6%
And of the 202 draft-eligible players (college, high school, JUCO), 74 were drafted in the first round.
And of the top 50 VORP batters, 17 were high school players, 22 were first round picks.
I know Nate and others believe that the for the success of the Dodgers and their minor league system, Logan White needs to apply his MLB Draft success to the international scouting (Latin America, Asia) and start signing some high ceiling talent for the Dodgers.
Off the top of my head, Tony Abreu and Chin-Ling Hu are the top international signees in the system and they were signed 4 years ago. With a legacy of Ramon and Pedro Martinez, Adrian Beltre, Raul Mondesi, Chan-Ho Park, Hideo Nomo, to Joel Guzman, Hong Chi Kuo and Takeshi Saito, the Dodgers know the value of making this a key component of their development system and hopefully we will see some signees when they can start announcing them in a few weeks and then start seeing them in the system soon.
Here are the raw totals for the 254 starters:
Draft, High School: 78 30.7%
Draft, College: 96 37.8%
Draft, JUCO 28 11.0%
FA Latin America 48 18.9%
FA Asia 4 1.6%
And of the 202 draft-eligible players (college, high school, JUCO), 74 were drafted in the first round.
And of the top 50 VORP batters, 17 were high school players, 22 were first round picks.
I know Nate and others believe that the for the success of the Dodgers and their minor league system, Logan White needs to apply his MLB Draft success to the Dodgers' international scouting side of the player development system (Latin America, Asia) and start signing some high ceiling talent for the Dodgers.
Off the top of my head, Tony Abreu and Chin-Ling Hu are the top international signees in the system and they were signed 4 years ago. With a legacy of Ramon and Pedro Martinez, Adrian Beltre, Raul Mondesi, Chan-Ho Park, Hideo Nomo, to Joel Guzman, Hong Chi Kuo and Takeshi Saito, the Dodgers know the value of making this a key component of their development system and hopefully we will see some signees when they can start announcing them in a few weeks and then start seeing them in the system soon.
If Kuo and Schmidt can go yard I bet she could hit one.
you need to reverse this statement for pitchers and Little Leaguers
So are you friends with Alex Ochoa or do you just know a lot of guys with the Hiroshima Carp, aka the Kansas City Royals of Japan.
do you own a slappy McPop up jersey?
During one of our conversations, he said he had just spoken to Ochoa (he called him a good friend) and he said Alex had just been offered a contract to play in Japan. He told us how much fun the games are in Japan and how we should go and see some games there if given the chance.
He mentioned how much Alex was being offered to play and considering that he had a World Series ring, he felt Alex should go back to Japan.
I saw Brett Butler make a diving stop for a Tony Gwynn drive to left and then not get up as Gwynn and three teammates circled the bases.
Butler left the game, but he wasn't hurt all that badly. I think he stayed on the ground out of embarrassment.
Schmidt's situation reminds me of Nomo. The Dodgers at least got 1 good season (2003) out of Nomo before he crashed and burned.
Scouting Report on Billingsley
"Though Billingsley is a power pitcher with mid-90s heat, he also has a fantastic curveball and great command of his pitches, which also include a strong slider."
Great command?
ESPN's nationally televised game Wednesday? Boston at Atlanta.
Thank you, Everything Sox Pro Network.
10.29 K/9 3.08 BB/9 .221 BAA, .585 OPS Against.
Nothing like sitting through a nice 3 1/2 hour Tony La Russa-managed A's game to get you ready for bed.
They have warning tracks for a reason.
Heed the warning.
See "Kemp, Matt."
Nomo also posted a 112 ERA+ in 2002. We got two great seasons out of him for a very reasonable contract, and it wasn't his fault that Tracy kept on trotting him out to get mauled in 2004.
WWSH
Baseball reference shows Penny's ERA at 2.18.
However his Park Adjusted ERA is 4.29.
Thats the largest split i've ever seen.
His eqa's the last few years have been in the mid-.290's, so if his power is diminishing, he's still reasonable productive.
He doesn't seem to have a fit on this roster with Furcal around, unless he's willing to change his position on changing positions. Even then he's too expensive in terms of the pitching that will have to be parted with to acquire him.
Penny ERA:
Home: 1.38
Road: 3.29
That would seem to support a large "Park Adjusted ERA" split. Also, wouldn't we expect to see large Park Adjusted splits for other Dodger pitchers as well? And, do we see such splits?
ERA 1.82
Park Adjusted ERA 3.95
The stat JoeyP was looking (lgERA) at is not Penny's adjusted ERA, but the ERA for the league as a whole.
1. Nothing really, we just go with youth mixed in with hoping that Nomar, Kent etc turn it around
2. We make some trades but they are marginal. Like reshuffling the deck a little in hoping we catch a few great months out of a veteran 3b or RF.
3. Make a truly impact-ful franchise changing trade.
He is a SS and you know how Ned loves his shortstops.
Unless the fat tub of goo hitting machine becomes available I don't think we make a franchise changing trade.
I find (2) unlikely because marginal is exactly what we have already, so there's no need to trade for it. We have serviceable, somewhat adequate players in every role, up to and including the pinch hitters and backup catcher.
(3) is always a possibility, given Colletti's penchant for showmanship over smart maneuvering. This is a man who lusts after the show-stopper trade. Still, I think any such trade would mortgage the future to such an extent that even Colletti can see it's unwise.
As much as some would like to scrap it all and go young, it is hard thing to do and sell to your fan base.
Sure, those who venture here know the youngsters who are playing in Tampa Bay, Florida, Colorado, and Arizona but their fans have not embraced them yet.
Part of it may be just the pains of growing a fan base, Colorado led the league in attendance for many years but after trying different things to compete, they are now drawing almost half the fans they were drawing 10 years ago.
Even successful teamms, the Twins, A's and to a certain extent the Padres have problems getting folks to consistently attend games even though they compete on annual basis and are not filled with a lot of highly paid, underachieving players.
My point is that, as much it might make sense to deal a Tejada, Miguel Cabera or similar type player for a boatload of prospects, GMs on those teams are hesitant because even if it works out, the GMs that make the deals are not usually around to get the credit.
I think short of Miguel Cabera, who can play 3rd/OF, they could control for a few years and is both playing well and is a proven guy, they won't deal for a Dunn, Rolen, Glaus, or Dye kind of player.
"This is a man who lusts after the show stopper trade"
Really?
1. Rick Rhoden
2. Rick Sutcliffe
3. Fernando
4. Fat Tub Of Goo Forster
5. Don Drysdale
Man we've had some nice hitting pitchers.
http://tinyurl.com/yuqdy
1991 - 3.3 million fans
1992 - 2.4 million fans
1993 - 3.1 million fans
Since I never saw Drysdale play, I would actually tab Andy Messersmith as the best hitting pitcher I've seen at Dodger Stadium with Fernando second.
Actually, one person commenting on the Loney injury in the game thread did:
2007-06-17 15:42:39162. MMSMikey
151
put some of it on tomko too for continuing to throw batting practice.
This is a move I'd love to see. It's unlikely to happen because the Dodgers appear to have already decided that Ethier is not a centerfielder. Still though, while not as fast as Pierre or Kemp he appears to be a better defensive outfielder than either of them. Besides, on Saturday the FOX announcers referred to Ethier as "speedy." They may be on to something. :-)
http://tinyurl.com/bfb2n
Dodger attendance will be very good unless someone really messes things up, but there is still a meaningful difference between 3.1 million and 3.5 million; a half million more people times, say $20/person revenue = $10 million, just to make a ballpark guess.
Maybe Ethier can become our Edmunds. Edmunds didn't play CF full time until his 3rd year in the majors, plus he didn't show plus power until he became a full time CF. So if we carry this a step further, Ethier needs to play CF to unleash his power. It all seems so obvious.
133 1992 was the last season the National League used "butts in seats" as their count for the official attendance. So its possible and probably probable, they sold close to 3 million seats but only 2.4 million actually showed up to games.
I think back then, they had a cut-off of 27,000 season tickets and you would have to think they would have done better than sell an additional 3,000 or so tickets per game on top of that.
In 1974, Messersmith batted .240, drew 11 walks and had eight doubles (including three in one game, a record for pitchers in the 20th Century) and a home run off of Clay Kirby of the Reds.
I know Cloniger had the greatest single offensive inning a pitcher ever had but you actually saw him hit? He would make a great subject for the Cardboard Gods. I used to read the back of his baseball card over and over and I was more in awe of him then Hank Aaron.
I think the Dodgers would be embarrassed if they went back to the "butt" in seats way of counting attendance. We have to lead the league in % of no shows for tickets sold.
The Dodgers also lost a few dates in 1992 because of "unpleasantness."
BA OBP SLG *OPS+
.238 .253 .323 60
http://tinyurl.com/create.php
That article says the average no-show rate for season ticket holders is between 15-20%.
Your link took me to tinyurl not the article.
http://tinyurl.com/2y2vcq
So'd I. I loved his swinging bunt choppers over 3B.
First time in awhile I had seen Tomko pitch in person; I had forgotten that he actually looks like he should be more successful. Schmidt was painful to watch; there just wasn't much there, outside of a some well-placed, but slow, pitches.
Frankie Rodriguez was tough. I wonder if that choppy motion is less stressful than it appears. During his celebration after string out Saenz to end it, Olmedo gave him quite a long look while slowly walking back toward the dugout.
Now, I gather, they just count tickets distributed as the official attendance, which leaves us with the repetitive 56,000 number.
Thanks for the link. The Lakers make it easy on their web site to donate any unused tickets to organizations. It would be cool if the better Dodger seats that aren't used were donated but they don't seem to have the same deal with ticketmaster that the Lakers have. The Dodgers charge you 2.00 to email a ticket while the Lakers/Clippers charge nothing. I would be curious to know if the no show rate has improved since all the teams have setup ticketmaster accounts for their season ticket holders and now everyone can forward or sell them with minimal work involved. From a subjective viewpoint we seem to have as many empty seats as ever in area's that you know are sold out.
The only person who ever saw Newcombe bat in person on this site is Don Burns but I haven't seem him post for a while. Hope he's okay and that we see him at the DT game.
Three dingers in one game this weekend. Now carrying a plus 600 slug%.
Can he play centerfield? Just asking...
What really riles up the message board guys is that a majority of the no-shows are the long time supporters who sit in the premium seats.
UCLA is concerned about the no-shows, they sent out several e-mails to season ticket holders, set up a ticket exchange program, etc.
I'm still not sure if there is a way to get people to see Yale, one of their 2007-2008 non-conference opponents in December but if back to back Final Fours and Kevin Love won't bring fans out, what will?
>>> The Angels simply own the Dodgers.
No Dodger could offer an explanation for the lopsided results in the Freeway Series, in which the Angels won five of six games, but the answer was simple, really. The Angels had better defense. They had much better pitching. And they had really good hitting. <<<
http://www.presstelegram.com/sports/ci_6166421
>>> The Angels rank ninth in the 14-team American League in slugging at .416, and 11th in home runs with 54.
The Dodgers rank 28th among all teams in slugging at a miserable .378 and dead last in home runs with 44 in 69 games. <<<
http://www.presstelegram.com/sports/ci_6166419
>>> Third baseman Andy LaRoche returned to the Las Vegas 51s lineup after missing the previous three days with a sore shoulder. ... <<<
http://www.dailybreeze.com/sports/articles/8046067.html
I think you can operate under a basic assumption that many commenters here do look around the web for Dodger stories, especially from the various local papers. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I'm sort of feeling like we're getting to the point of overkill.
Actually, the story in 185 about LaRoche was news to me, but linking to a story from a local paper that tells us that the Dodgers are offensively challenged (184) - I think that's an example of one you could have left out.
Hope I don't sound like a jerk.
I will post links to local stories when its late (or early) and they have information that folks would be interested here.
Generally, while trying to be consistent in not reposting content from premium sites (ESPN Insider, Baseball Prospectus or Baseball America), I will also selectively post tidbits of information that again is interesting, hoping that folks find it fun and informative and maybe they will decide to subscribe to the site too.
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_ros&cid=465
interestingly, only one 2007 draftee so far is on the roster and that is behemoth of a player, 18yr old Franklin Jacobs.
Kyle Orr is still listed under Catchers and there looks to be an interesting international player in Jesus Gomez. He is interesting because he is only 18 and is a 6'2 195lb left handed swinging first basemen.
However, for a player like Josh Bell, if he doesn't move up to the Cal League this year, he may not even be in AA until 2009.
Gomez is definitely an interesting player to watch.
"You said it, man. Nobody {ahem} with the Jesus." Sorry, couldn't resist a Lebowski quote before taking off for the day.
thats why it surprised me when i saw Gallagher listed under the Raptor's roster. Personally, I am a big fan of pushing prospects, especially highly rated ones.
I remember Tim Leary hitting the ball with authority & when i say that i mean there was a different sound when he connected. Fernando,Dreifort,Orel all great hitters also, i remember watching Fernando hit a ball half way up the RF bleachers once, monster shot like K/Guo.
Someone I've never heard of was the hero in that game for the 51s, though. John Lindsey(?) drove in the winning run, and also slammed a two-out homer in the fourth, giving him 3 in 3 games.
And Guillen is a triple short of a cycle through 5.
LaRoche has only three home runs all year. The thing that concerned me while watching him during his callup was how infrequently he actually drove the ball. Sure he walked a lot and that was good. But I didn't see any of the power he is supposed to have. And I don't know what part his shoulder injury is playing in this but I'm guessing it has something to do with it.
"909ddgerfn: I've noticed Andy LaRoche hasn't been hitting with a lot of power lately, do you think he is still lingering from his labrum injuries or do you believe this is something he'll be able to work out of?
White: Good question. I think it is a little of both, but Andy has always been a slow starter, and I expect him to really heat up the second half. I think you'll see his power numbers go up once he becomes a Major Leaguer. "
Prince Fielder:
GPA: .327
Home Runs as % of Fly Balls: 26.6% going into tonight.
Pretty impressive even if he looks like he swallowed Junior Spivey.
Exactly
Laroche was smart enough to take pitches, like a dumb person who is smart enough not to open his mouth so that his ignorance will be broadcasted. The truth is coming out. When an advanced prospect shows almost no power at Vegas, something is awry.
Shoulderr injuries and surgeries need to be taken more seriously by the people in charge. Left to his own devices and pulled by the marketplace, an athlete is apt to downplay them.
The yellow flags were sticking out of the shoulders of both Laroche and Schmidt. I was hopeful that Conte's history with Schmidt would allow Ned to make a more informed investment. Unfortunatly the results have only reinforced my view that Conte's primary talent is one for self-aggrandizement in the press. Once again the Dodgers got taken while "showing the public" how much they "want to win" by spending (wasting) money on a free agent.
The Dodgers got taken by Schmidt and his agent.
Monday's move followed Schmidt's Saturday start, after which he admitted that the condition of his shoulder had not changed since his first pitch of Spring Training.
Wonders of wonders that Sluething Stan couldn't drag it out of Schmidt despite all that time together with the Giants. Once again, failed process bites the Dodgers.
Rather than pay through the nose in a sellers market, the Dodgers should have heeded the warning signs -- the repeated shoulder problems, the diminished life on Schmidt's fastball, the injury cascade. In his next life, Schmidt comes back as Joe Mays. Or DJ Houlton.
"The Boston Globe reported that the Red Sox would be able to opt out of Drew's contract after three years if he has major right shoulder woes in the third year of the deal. If Drew has a significant injury to the right shoulder in the fourth year of the deal, the Red Sox could void the fifth year."
That seems kinda ridiculous. If he has shoulder problems (which he apparently does), said problems probably aren't going to hold off another 3 years until they cause problems.
This Dodgers.com article:
http://tinyurl.com/3yr3jt
And I have read that Kyle Orr is definitely going to be playing first base in the GCL, which makes it interesting with Franklin Jacobs and this new Latino first baseman on the same team.
220--If Schmidt's shoulder feels the same now as it did in spring training---then what in the world was the propaganda about concerning Schmidt's DL trip? All we heard was about was how Schmidt looked great and was progressing fine. Did he just since Saturday finally come clean to the doctors about his shoulder?
239
I got home for the end of the Nats game. Bob Carpenter sounded like someone told him his puppy died at the end of the game.
His signing was almost universally approved both on the player and contract length.
Its true, this is not a new injury but it is certainly something that could be reviewed and examined prior to the deal but sometimes all the exams in the world are not going stop an injury from reoccuring.
There is no such thing as a completely healthy player, some have been fortunate to escape pro-longed injury but for the most part, it is just part of the game.
What I'm saying is that if it was so obviously a bad signing, then you would have expected a bigger outcry against it instead of the praise it did get.
Has it worked out, not so far but that can be said for a lot of free agents. Whether its Carl Pavano, A.J. Burnett, Randy Johnson (2nd trip to DL), Drew, Lugo (not injured but performance issues), our own lovable JP, Eric Milton, etc. Bartolo Colon hasn't been healthy since he won his Cy Young award.
I don't know what else to say, except you can remove the risk by never signing a free agent but other than that, there is not much due diligence teams can do aside from get trusted advice, good medical evaluations and hope the player doesn't ride a motorcycle or any household chores.
And yet I own his brand of scorebook!
I think that is especially true when it comes to veterans on the other side of 30.
Schmidt probably felt he could gut his way through a few starts and eventually the shoulder (or whatever ails him) would start to feel better but it never did.
What he probably didn't want was surgery and the ordeal that follows but now it looks like that is a possibility.
Universally approved? The Giants, who knew Schmidt best, showed very little interest in resigning him. Maybe they were listening to someone other than Conte. Maybe they were heeding the decline in stuff.
As for the happy buzz when Schmidt was signed, some of that was from the lemming crowd that is bored for any baseball news in the winter.
Schmidt's stuff generally has been in decline and the litany of shoulder ailments certainly gave one pause.
I think it was a case of the supply of good pitching being low, so it was hard to criticize the Dodgers for taking a chance on a guy with at least a proven upside.
That said, there were quite a few Giants fan saying Schmidt had diminished velocity during the 2nd half of last season. I dont think many Dodger fans panned the move bc not many seen many of Schmidt's starts--I know I didnt.
It was probably a risk worth taking given what was available in the market. If the Dodgers have 120 mils to spend, I'm glad they at least spent it on one high upside Schmidt, rather than spend it on 3 Nomar's. [Insert Gritty average 8mil a yr veteran]
Thanks for the heads up Dodgers49.
Go figure.
I predict next Sunday.
At least Nomar has his contract what in the world is up with A Jones? How many millions is he costing Boras who last winter was whispering something about an Arod type of deal.
Hindsight is easy but DSFAN was critical of the signing when it happened. I guess the rest of us were just lemmings. Luckily I turned right at some point but unfortunately TJ Simers turned with me.
http://tinyurl.com/3xdw8z
I didn't love the Schmidt signing, but, since I wasn't crazy about the Furcal signing either, I decided to keep it under my hat. I think. I could look it up. Pierre was signed first and was the central problem. As far as that goes, The Player abides.
Well, he's made it through three innings. I'd love to see him go another three because I suspect that would earn him another start and I would consider that a win for us on Sunday. :-)
At .208/.307/.400---if Jones BABIP normalizes, he'll probably still get respectable numbers. Not as good as his previous years, but not a disaster. His current OPS+ is still 90.
His BABIP is just .208
true. but i'm still rooting for the guy, he has a great fastball but no control over it & no movement. His curve balls today are all up so the D-Backs are hitting him pretty hard so far.
SF, instead of resigning their ace of the precious 4 or 5 years, was desperately trying to throw boatloads of $$$ at Zito. It should have been a cautionary note for SF not to be at all interested in Schmidt.
However, the euphoria of signing a "genuine" ace overwhelmed any though process that might have gone on.
Schmidt might be Ned's Dreifort/Brown/Perez. I guess every Dodger GM has one eventually.
Riccardi has Burnett and Ryan.
Billy Beane doesn't sign big money guys for long term deals but he does try to get deals with his players to avoid arbitration. So now he has issues with Harden, Hudson, Bradley, Kotsay, etc.
Stoneman with Colon.
And I could go on and on. There is always a risk when you make these deals but the key is to be prepared when your guys get hurt.
i dont think you can just look at BABIP by itself and say "oh his BABIP is low, he has been lucky". You need to correlate it to line drive percentage i think.
The great thing about the Kevin Brown deal was not only getting rid of the contract but we still have value from that deal because we got Weaver (who became Morris (who had Tommy John surgery and Mattingly) plus Brazoban.
I thought it was a hand injury.
I started to mention the return on the trade as well, but didn't. Weaver was an average starter for two Dodger seasons, so that is certainly not a bad trade given the circumstances. All the Yankees have to show for it is Brown's 35 starts over two seasons, with that one post-season raking by the Red Sox.
i read the same thing about Gallagher but somehow he ended up in Ogden.
regfairfield is the person we want for this, I think, but I'll throw the numbers out there.
A Jones line drive percentage is 17.7% with a BABIP of .244
I believe that his BABIP should be higher based on that. I think a rough rule is you add 12 to the line drive rate to get expected BABIP. I think really you also have to look at fly ball and ground ball rates.
In 2005 his BABIP was also .244, off of a line drive percentage of 16%. And yet his batting average was actually higher than his BABIP, at .263. This is because he hit 51 home runs.
And this gets to what I think Jones' real problem is. He may be getting slightly unlucky, but he's just not hitting the home runs like he used to. He has just 11 this year, on a pace for 25 or so.
Navarro's line drive percentage is 15.8%. He may be getting unlucky, but he's also not hitting the ball hard very often.
2004- ERA of 5, but made all his starts and Angels in playoffs.
2005- Cy Young, deserved.
2006- 10 starts injured and not good.
2007- 10 starts, numbers as bad as last year.
So, assuming all the added line drives replace non-line drive outs, 2% more LD% is 1.5% more hits (assuming all the line drives replace non-line drive outs), or .015 increase in BA?
He stated that:
75% of line drives turn into hits.
22.7% of ground balls turn into hits.
21.7% of fly balls turn into hits.
Navarro's 2007 percentages so far are:
GB: 42.1%
FB: 42.1%
LD: 15.8%
Therefore, to calculate his expected hits:
134 X .421 X .227 = 12.80
134 X .421 X .217 = 12.25
134 X .158 X .750 = 15.88
The 134 is Navarro's In play ABs (Total Abs-K's)
Expected Hits: 40.93
40.93/163= .251 Expected Batting Average.
Navarro's actual batting average this year is 28/163= .172
So, Navarro's gotten very unlucky this year. Its just so much easier to look at BABIP (when its as low as Navarro's was), rather than to do all of the above calculations.
I suspect Andruw Jones has a similar unlucky streak, although it may not be as pronounced as Navarro's since AJ is K'ing much more this year.
Kent was quoted earlier this year (Dodgers.com, I think) saying the Giants often don't make much effort to re-sign their own free agents. Said he pretty much knew he wouldn't have the chance to stay with them, that they never made him an offer,IIRC.
About that same time Schmidt said something similar. SF has re-signed some. But they don't seem to make much of a move on many of their FAs, according to these two Dodgers.
This was discussed on DT earlier this season with links to what the two said, if someone wants to look it up.
If the Dodgers had someone assigned to watch Schmidt every time he pitched late last year, they might have picked up some things. But really, how practical would that have been?
134 X .421 X .227 = 12.80
134 X .401 X .217 = 11.66
134 X .178 X .750 = 17.89
Expected hits: 42.35
42.35/163= .260 Expected Batting Average
for an increase of .009.
I've felt that at least some of that has to do with speed, but I could be wrong. It just seems like fast guys are more likely to get lucky but fat guys get unlucky.
Here's the PrOPS for LA
http://tinyurl.com/26c47j
Johan Santana probably should have won (he'd be working on 3 straight right now), and Mark Buehrle, to name another, should have also finished ahead of Colon.
Colon: 21-8, 223 IP, 120 ERA+, 157/43 K/BB
Santana: 16-7, 232 IP, 153 ERA+, 238/45 K/BB
Buehrle: 16-8, 237 IP, 143 ERA+, 149/40 K/BB
He put up .269/.279/.388 over 134Abs.
Tony Abreu is at .270/.286/.405 over his first 74 Abs.
I realize that Abreu is bigger physically than Izturis, but their production at the minor league level and both's inability to walk or hit for much power---is cause for concern.
I really wouldnt mind if Ned traded Abreu, as long as he got back something useful.
I agree Santana should probably have own, 5 less wins notwithstanding. Colon was 3rd in WHIP at 1.159, but Santana was ridiculous at 0.971, with Buehrle 7th at 1.183. Santana's Ks led the AL and his raw ERA was 0.01 off the AL lead (Millwood). Note: Colon's ERA was 8th but only 3rd on the Angels' staff, behind Washburn (4th) and Lackey (6th).
Growing up, I saw a lot of Dodgers-Astros games. There always seemed to be lots of tickets to see the Astros in the 1970s. And the Braves.
You could always just completely wipe the hard drive and transfer all your data on to something else like an iPOD and then reload what you want.
http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html
If that doesn't do it, you could try Windows System Restore. It's preinstalled, and should have been automatically backing up your registry. Just tell it restore to some point prior to your infection. If that doesn't work, you could be looking at formating your harddrive and reinstalling everything. Hope you were diligent in backing up your data!
262/.297/.332
abreus minor league numbers not including AAA this year
.300/*.344/.424
i probably messed up the OBP by a couple points. But Abreus baseballcube record is divided among two names.
What you can do is run Windows in safe mode, and then try to run your anti-spyware software.
i havent been scanning in safe mode, why would that matter?
If you really want to slug your way through get Hijackthis. Searching for it should bring up some helpful forums that will assist you in getting the most out of the program as it can be quite cryptic.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.