Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
How much uncertainty is there over the Dodgers' fate for the 2007 season?
At least this much:
Will the tireless Jon Weisman ever tire of keeping this an enlightened, energized, entertaining and authoritative site? Let's hope not.
--I dont think Kuo will be given another chance. I see Tomko/Hendrickson/Trade deadline veteran in front of him.
--Wolf will be out of commission by the middle August. Too many innings on his arm in his comeback year.
--Meloan in 2008 if he's not traded before then
--Lots of rope if he pitches well sunday. 1 good sunday start will likely buy him 3-4 more bad ones. Tomko's got too much veteranness to be DFA'ed.
--No. I doubt Abreu will ever be better than Jeff Kent, while each of them are active MLB'ers.
--Betemit will be the left handed Olmedo Saenz as his Dodger career progresses. A nice guy to have off the bench, but really a failure in proper asset utilization. Both players will be looked back upon as players that should have been platooned much more, given more abs, than just pinch hitters.
--Nomar needs the juice.
--Loney will be allowed to slump since he doesnt strike out much. Kemp wont be, since he K's a lot.
---Gonzo will fall off the cliff starting the last week of July.
--Furcal will hit for a bit more power as the season progresses. But other than that, I think what you see is what you get with Furcal.
--Pierre being rested helps the Dodgers since his absence from the lineup provides a chance for a better player to be inserted. With Furcal, he's the best the Dodgers have at SS. So he has to play or else it hurts the team.
--If Russ Martin gets hurt, the Dodgers will finish 8-10 games out of 1st place.
--Trade Dealine will do neither, since I dont see anything of impact leaving, or coming.
I worry that you're right about this. It's got me to the point that I don't know what to do about Sunday: can't root against Tomko. Also can't root for him to succeed, because I know it won't last.
I am thinking about forgetting that the Dodgers play on Sunday.
Thanks for clearing it all up Bob. I guess there is no need to stick around this thread today.
I'm the Answer Man. The Reason Man is the next door down.
Grady's "player's manager" tag means nothing to me given that every veteran position player on our team except for Gonzo is slumping.
Pierre in the field and at the top of the lineup every single day at the expense of Kemp. Waiting far too long to move Nomar and get Loney in there. Tomko's 7 losses with #8 likely to come on Sunday...
Generally, I agree that a manager doesn't have much effect on a team's W-L record... unless, of course, the manager consistently refuses to play the team's best players. I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that this Dodger team would be 4 wins better (and on a 96 win pace) if Grady wasn't completely ridiculous on a daily basis.
yes
no but hopefully a moot point
Monday July 16th
not much (see above)
another moot point assuming Kent is physically able to play
only if he plays enough for his average to naturally revert upwards
"retirement"
yes
august
yes
Furcal - yes, Pierre - no
no
neutral
2 Amen!
Once he was signed, he was going to play everyday.
And going into the second half, the question of Juan Pierre and his playing time is less important than who is going fill in the bottom part of the rotation, who is going to be the bridge in the bullpen to Broxton and Saito, can Loney continue to play well, will it be Nomar or Betemit be playing at 3B in September.
I realize its easy to pick on Juan Pierre but if he we get to September and those other issues I listed are resolved well, than we can get back to the issue of JP. I just don't think it is the end of all Dodger woes if he was sitting on the bench instead of playing.
2. He hurt. When he pitch, he bad. When he healthy, he won't get a chance.
3. I think players who are hurting and don't say anything ought to be pistol whipped with a sawed off fungo.
4. August and he's going to make a difference.
5. Enough to hang himself after Sunday. He's nice, he's an artist but I'll take the cro-magnon personalities who happen to get outs.
6. No way. Jeff Kent would have to fall very, very far to worry about playing time. He ain't there yet. He's been a terrific signing and thanks again, Paul DePodesta.
7. They sure will. It's why he's a pinch hitter as opposed to an everday player. As an everday player, he struggles but as a pinch hitter, he mashes. It's logic, Jon... didn't we talk about this?
8. Alright, who's willing to make a bid on a jersey?
9. Jon, young players who struggle need to get sent down so they can work on their mechanics and not get destroyed psychologically by a long slump (say, a 2-for-12 stretch) while veterans need to stay in the lineup to work their way out of a slump. That's logic, Jon, and dammit all, didnn't we talk about this already?
10. My man Luis, still the nicest, most genuine guy I've met in the game and that is saying something, will continue to produce barring injury.
11. First half Furcal is what we'll see in the second half: fine average, little power, love that cannon arm.
12. I am officially in a no-talk-about-Juan zone for the rest of July.
13 should be rule 13: No one is allowed to speculate about Russell Martin getting injured.
14. I want to be wrong but I think Ned makes a trade of youth for veteran presence. He won't trade the store for a superstar but I think he'll make the damaging move of youngstuh for proven vet and it will hurt us all.
2. Doubtful, the arm injuries are just too much. If he's only throwing 88, it's not worth risking even more damage.
3. Probably not, he needs to activate that option, and the only way it won't happen is if he doesn't pitch.
4. September 1st
5. None
6. No, Abreu isn't a viable major leaguer until he stops swinging at pickoff attempts.
7. No, but he'll be kept around because of his utility status.
8. Not really, I'd call up LaRoche, let Nomar only start against lefties, if that doesn't work, it's DFA time.
9. Loney, yes, Kemp, no.
10. Not much, the warning signs were to great heading into the season.
11. Given Furcal's history of exploding in the second half, he'll be fine.
12. Probably not, they should just naturally improve, rest or no.
13. No, the Lieberthal-Huckaby tandem won't do much at all.
14. Right now, I'd be pleasantly surprised if LaRoche was on the team in August, so I'll say hurt.
I'm having a similar problem with Wolf. His shoulder began to bother him after half a season of pitching. He will take some time off. But I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him go down again in late August or September.
I can accept that Pierre must play regularly, but I cannot accept any rationale that puts him in the 1 and 2 hole every single day with his .310 OBP.
Also, I agree that speculation about Russ getting injured should be strictly forbidden.
>>> Dr. Jack Singer, a certified sports psychologist based in Laguna Beach, Calif., said there's a simple reason why a player such as Garcia would risk his career and more by continuing to take steroids after a first positive test.
"Steroids are very addictive, like any other drug people shouldn't be taking without a lot of extreme care," he said. "When someone becomes addicted, it's difficult to stop. <<<
http://www.lvrj.com/sports/8483542.html
>>> Despite a widely reported effort by the Yankees to open negotiations for a contract extension, Rodriguez said he had no intention of bargaining until after the season. <<<
http://tinyurl.com/2p447g
1) Hope
2) Faith
3) Hope&Faith
So... it's gonna happen.
These games will feature the Charley/Psycho on TV and Monday and Reuss on the radio - 7/23 - 7/25 (3); 8/7 - 8/12 (6); 8/21 - 8/26 (6); and 9/3 - 9/6 (4).
Also Saturday games on Fox or in the window where the Dodgers can't televise the game. Those games are on 7/14; 7/21; 9/8; 9/29 (but if that game is played in the afternoon and is important for playoff implications, chances are Vin would do the radio broadcast, similar to the playoffs)
So that is only 23 out of 79 games, so Vin is around most of the time.
Unless Pierre and Furcal can generate more runs (not to mention Kent and Nomar stepping it up), we may not have enough to overtake the Friars from down south.
I still think we're a playoff team (division winner or wild card), but it isn't going to be easy.
Tom Hicks is hoping and praying that Boras and A-Rod are true to their word of going after the 30 million deal.
Can Hong-Chih Kuo contribute this year?- Yes, he'll tithe 20% to the Free Taiwan fund.
Will Randy Wolf tell us if he's still hurting?-No, but it won't matter because the results will show if he's hurting
When will Jonathan Meloan get his chance to prove his value to the major-league roster? July
How much rope will Brett Tomko get?-enough to hang himself. That was to easy, I think he gets DFA'd, goes to the Mets where all used up Dodgers go and beats us in a meaningful game behind the bat of Marlon Anderson.
By September, will Tony Abreu be a better overall option at second base, offense and defense combined, than Jeff Kent? No, his lack of patience will be his downfall in the short term and Kent can still hit enough to make up the statuesque defense.
Will the Dodgers ever focus on what Wilson Betemit does when he hits the ball over what happens when he doesn't? Yes they love Boom Boom, but it is a tough love.
Is there an answer to Nomar Garciaparra's problems? Yes it is called the bench but I was unaware there was a problem. Were winning, he's driving in runs, what's the problem:)
Will James Loney and Matt Kemp be allowed to slump, so that they can come out of their slumps? Loney never slumps so it doesn't come up, Kemp doesn't play enough to go into a slump.
How much longer can Luis Gonzalez defy the aging process this year?-Just long enough to get an extension and screw us in 2008
Will 123 hours of rest this week give Rafael Furcal what he needs for a better second half? Yes, he will have a 2nd half very close to 2006
Would more rest help Furcal or Juan Pierre? Nothing can help Pierre, he is what he is. He'll have a strong 2nd half compared to his 1st half which means instead of being the 21st worse CF in baseball he'll only be the 15th worse.
If Russell Martin gets hurt, can Mike Lieberthal keep hope alive? Golden Boy will not get hurt, only a hater would even suggest it.
Will the trade deadline hurt the franchise or help it? Hurt so badly that Nate and Canuck will cry in unison a wail of anguish so loud that it will be heard from California to British Columbia. Actually I think a little hurt, maybe just a knee abrasion kind of hurt where once you lick the scab off, you forget why you were crying.
Like any break-up, there are probably things that both parties could have and should have done differently but in the end a decision was made and both went their separate ways.
Now if he wants to tell us how frustrated he was when he saw Jason Phillips play first base, now that is something I would want to read.
Next you'll be saying something like this team is in the playoffs right now, better record than next year, etc. You are such a pollyanna.
Point is, you don't really know how these OF signings will turn out when you make them, and like everyone else, I'm not excusing the JP contract.
It is the Tracy/DePodesta dynamic that would be the undercurrent of the story.
However, it would amuse me much if Paul said something like, I would hear Lasorda down the hall and I would immediately go in the opposite direction.
Actually we should just write it ourselves.
My chapter will be, "The Day the Music Died or 100 reasons why I made the LoDuca trade"
Reason number one, I don't believe in anyone being the "heart and soul" of the ballclub.
Mathematically, can you tithe 20%?
man how erroneous can I get? You are correct, it was Carlos Lee (and it's free). Why do I keep getting them confused (and it rocks).
>>> "If I were to call the Bonds' home run, it would be stripped to its bare bones as far as I'm concerned," Scully said Thursday before departing to San Francisco. <<<
http://www.dailybreeze.com/sports/articles/8481232.html
I'm fear that we end up hearing that Kuo is done for the season.
With regard to Tomko, how close are Grady and Ned to the end of their ropes? Very near, methinks.
I hope the A-S break helped Furcal's ankle in a significant way.
The trade deadline may hurt the franchise even if no move is made because I think the Padres will improve themselves between now and then. Heck, Bradley is already a significant improvement over the PAs that would have gone to Sledge, et. al.
Since starting in Tampa Bay, the only game Loney didn't start was against Dontrelle Willis last Friday. Loney was 3-25 from 6/30 - 7/6 inclusive, then had the 4-4 on Saturday, so perhaps he has already been allowed to play through a slump.
Ned seemed to make it sound as if this is Tomko's last chance. The obvious problems with that are at least two:
1. Tomko has had plenty of last chances already
2. If he pitches well in his last chance, does that mean he passes the test and gets to stick around for the rest of the year, no matter what? Or, is every outing a last chance? If we haven't seen enough of him up to this point to make an accurate evaluation, what more are we really going to learn from another start or two?
45 I found it here and I can see why Vinny would just like to be part of breaking that record just once in his life. BTW, as only Vinny can do, 27 seconds of crowd noise from his last word on the call, "Gone"
But then Vin really sums up the social and historical implications of a black man breaking Babe Ruth's, the symbol of baseball, greatest record in the Deep South (Vin's words) and being cheered by all there in Atlanta.
Its a nice moment, take a listen sometime today.
http://atlanta.braves.mlb.com/atl/history/aaron.jsp
I haven't listened to the Lakers on radio or watched them on television since Chick left. I won't finish this thought.
>>> Guided by Boras, A-Rod will opt out, and it will be the Giants -- sans Barry Bonds -- who will sign him to a very lucrative, multi-year deal beginning next season. <<<
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19713122
If they were going to start a rebuilding process next year, post-Bonds, why keep Sabes around?
Just wondering as a fellow supporter.
Haven't O'Malley/McCourt always owned Dodger Stadium?
3 of the top 10 worst offseason free agent signings for 2007
(At least according to this column. Thanks Ned.)
And then when you click on Nomar's link he looks awfully BIG and seems tiny now. Maybe that's what they can't explain.
Yep. The fact that Nomar hasn't addressed it makes it seem suspicious. I haven't seen the 2007 Nomar with his shirt off, but I doubt he looks anything like the way he looks on that magazine cover.
Justin Upton, the 19 year old who has been in High A and AA has a combined OPS of 931. Both of them well probably touch 4 levels this season and end up in the Show in Sept.
Only in your mind's eye, huh?
Everyone would be reluctant, but if Moreno can waste 6 million on Hillebrand he can pay the going rate on Arod. He can put him at SS, trade Cabrera and put Wood at 3b or reverse the two. A minium wage infield of Kotchman/Kendrick/Wood would take some of the sting out of the 30 million.
Dodgers could do the same. Hope Kent walks and go with infield of Loney, Abreu, Arod, La Roche.
One of the things that made me chuckle here was that I recall reading somewhere that Ty Cobb (The Georgia Peach, himself) considered Babe Ruth to be a black man (and once refused to room with him). So I imagine he would have just ignored all the hoopla had he still been around. :-)
Still shy of the 30mils needed for A-Rod.
1) the most (or close to the most) resources of any team;
(2) a strong desire/need to stay relevant after a down year and with an aging core of superstars;
(3) a huge competitive advantage because of the money Texas is still doling out on ARod's current contract. Assuming they can get an extension done, they basically have a $30 million head start on everyone else, right?
Seems like just wishful thinking/cyncial effort to sell copy to suggest otherwise. Am I off-base?
Totally unexpected to see him put up .279/.371/.543 while playing CF in major leagues.
http://tinyurl.com/2qh4re
Satchel Paige's one regret in baseball was not striking out Ruth in a Major League contest.
The other thing about Cobb and Ruth, it wasn't as if their careers did not overlap quite a bit, Cobb started playing full time in 1907, Ruth began pitching full time in 1915. Cobb's last year was 1928 so Cobb was there in the league when Ruth began the change from the Deadball era to the Home run era in the 1920's.
Cobb, was probably the best offensive player, with Wagner, until Ruth swung a bat as a Yankee. But Ruth became a much much bigger star, the first modern age superstar in American sports. No surprise that Cobb probably didn't like nor appreciate what was going on in his game.
He may very well end up back in NY, but I bet he opts-out first and NY has to bring him back on a "new" contract.
However, like Penny---Broxton has survived on not allowing home runs.
45 ip--0 homers allowed this year.
As mentioned above, LA nearly has $30M coming off the books in expiring contracts alone, and no one is due for any big raises. If Ned committed starting jobs (no "veteran presences" allowed) to the young'ns (specifically Billingsley and Kemp) LA could be a player for ARod. Who knows?
Then again, he does have mountains of glossy paper with which to plead his case, so anything's possible.
"And given the showings by Dioner Navarro(-15), Edwin Jackson(-18.9), Jae Seo(-19), Joel Guzman, and Sergio Pedroza, perhaps GM Andrew Friedman should let Ned Colletti's next phone call go directly to voicemail. "
I only find this amusing because it is the direct opposite of what most DT posters were saying one year ago on Aug 1st.
Also, I'd guess Luis Gonzalez has at least a 50% shot of being resigned for 2008. The next few months will obviously go a long way in determining that.
The only way I see him being removed is if the bullpen was deemed too thin without him. Backwards logic it is, but I think they at least have a lot of confidence in his abilities now.
Versus
Navarro, Seo, Jtd, Jackson, Pedroria, Ruggiano
Time will tell.
Loney/Kent/Furcal/ARod
Kemp/Pierre/Ethier
Martin
Penny/Lowe/Billingsley/Schmidt/Kuo
and have it almost be a wash in salaries.
That's without even considering Kent might not come back. How are his PA's looking?
http://tinyurl.com/22vwov
Guzman, Ruggiano,Jackson Pedroza were prospects--in essence currency--that were used to buy something low in value. It doesnt matter that the "currency" dropped in value a year later, at the time it had a certain buying power of which Ned didnt utilize.
If you had a $100 in your pocket, and bought a box of paper clips for $100 last August 1st, thats a bad trade. If the next year rolls around and your currency's value has dropped, you still lose. Unless your claiming that your currency drops so low as to not even be able to buy something completely useless anyway--i.e a box of paper clips--or in the Dodgers case Mark Hendrickson.
I think if the Dodgers wanted too, if they still had Guzman, they could still deal him for a mediocre starting pitcher. Even today.
If only you could ask whether it's just you or whether you're the only one.
Other problems with the DRay trades:
1. Trading prospects for junk is generally not a good idea. Would this become a trend...?
2. The trades seemed to provide (disturbing) insight into how Ned evaluates players.
- Baez was "good" because he had saved 40+ games in a season before
- Carter was "good" because he was a former All-Star
- Hendrickson was "good" because his ERA was in the 3s at the time he was acquired
- Lugo was "good" because he was hitting over .300 at the time, with an uncharacteristically high number of HRs
If he keeps up his 4.16 PA/G ratio, he'll need to play in 52 of the remaining 73 games to get his 550. Looks like he'll be able to survive even one standard trip to the DL and still hit his number.
If he's healthy, he's getting his 180 IP.
http://tinyurl.com/2v7pqv
All good points except I don't think they could get a pitcher for JtD at this point that would be anything better then Tomko/Hendrickson/DJ Houlton.
Right
I think the scout who advised Ned on the Tampa deals has been eliminated from the big room.
If Grady ran MY life, I'd attend preschool instead of my kid, because I'm a proven veteran.
>>> Who's the best closer in baseball thus far in 2007? <<<
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7014472
April & May: 11 starts, 66 IP (6.0 per start), 3.41 ERA, 9.68 K/9, 2.59 BB/9
June & July: 7 starts, 36.2 IP (5.1 per start), 7.12 ERA, 5.65 K/9, 4.91 BB/9
I don't know if that was all health related, but you are right, it will be a chore for him to reach 180 IP.
I'm going on a limb and say he ain't doin' it.
http://www.walteromalley.com/docu_detail.php?gallery=2&set=5&docuID=150&pageNum=1
Or was it just one-way hate?
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=All3bdQ8QJGuq0ZBB9nLP8cRvLYF?slug=ap-mariners-suzuki&prov=ap&type=lgns
Furcal, SS
Pierre, CF
Martin, C
Kent, 2B
Gonzo, LF
Nomar, 3B
Loney, 1B
Ethier, RF
Billingsley, P
Pujols has played in a similar amount of games in the majors (both are at just over 1000 games played), and generated far superior stats. I'm doubtful that even he is worthy at this point.
In the Documentary Buzzie said Walter O'Malley hated Jackie Robinson's guts and vice versa. But it seems to me O'Malley's hatred of Jackie was kind of petty. Since virtually all of Jackie's contact was with Branch Rickey as he was being prepared to break the color line and whatever approval O'Malley gave was apparently behind the scenes why would O'Malley have expected Jackie Robinson to give him equal credit along with Branch Rickey?
1. Brad Penny? Much better second half this year. He's figured out what went wrong last season.
2. Hong-Chih Kuo? Don't expect to see him again this season, but it would be nice to be wrong.
3. Randy Wolf? I'm guessing he'll be honest. Doesn't want to alienate the Dodgers. Doesn't want to be seen as a risky signing after this season.
4. Jonathan Meloan? This season, baby! Tomko gets DFA'd, and sails away, $3 million richer, and within weeks, the sting is gone!
5. Brett Tomko? Rope to be parcelled out in units so small he can barely grasp them.
6. Tony Abreu vs. Jeff Kent? Maybe, but by that time, he'll be too busy playing 3b.
7. Wilson Betemit? I see him as trade bait.
8. Nomar Garciaparra's problems? Will be solved by a time machine. He's a bench player by the end of the season.
9. Will James Loney and Matt Kemp be allowed to slump? I suspect yes. They might ride the pine for a day or two, but they aren't going back to AAA.
10. Luis Gonzalez? If Grady Little wants to keep Gonzalez productive, he has a ready answer. He should do that.
11. Rafael Furcal? He needs more rest. I'm okay with Lucille playing short for a couple of weeks.
12. Would more rest help Furcal or Juan Pierre? Furcal yes, Pierre no. Pierre will not be as bad in the second half as he was in the first half.
13. If Russell Martin gets hurt...? The Dodgers are pretty well screwed if that happens.
14. Will the trade deadline hurt the franchise or help it? Hurt it, because the Padres are playing for this year, and so will get a slugger, and the Dodgers won't. But we have to be...okay...with that. A slugger doesn't help the Pads as much as they think it will. The press will kill Ned if he stands pat, but he should and he will.
O'Malley also hated Rickey because Rickey spent a lot of money on bad business ideas, such as starting a football team to play in Ebbets Field.
And in 1946, when the Dodgers got into a tiebreaker playoff with the Cardinals, O'Malley wanted the radio stations carrying the Dodgers to pay extra for those games since he felt they weren't part of their regular contract. Rickey insisted they were and his opinion prevailed.
In the long bio of Rickey I read by Lee Lowenfish, you can find a lot of things that Rickey did that O'Malley disliked and I can't say that O'Malley didn't have a good reason for disliking Rickey with some of the stuff Rickey did.
http://tinyurl.com/yrovgn
Okay Bob. :-) But it was O'Malley hatred of Jackie that I said seemed kind of petty. What's your take on that relationship?
I think O'Malley just didn't want someone around all the time who kept telling people that Rickey was great and O'Malley wasn't.
If you're Roger Kahn, this means that O'Malley was a racist.
If you're not Roger Kahn, O'Malley is just a guy who didn't like someone taking all the credit.
http://oregon.scout.com/2/658519.html
Rickey wanted to be in charge and he thought he knew more about running a baseball team than O'Malley. Rickey tended to think he knew more than just about everybody. In 1963, when that letter was written, Rickey was getting ready to take an advisory job with the Cardinals. The Cardinals would end up winning the World Series the next year despite Rickey getting the GM (Bing Devine) fired and the manager (Johnny Keane) so angry that he resolved to quit at the end of the year.
But O'Malley was a far more savvy businessman than Rickey was. And Rickey wasn't naive in business. But he was no O'Malley.
Ethier is a plus
Betemit is an enigma
Hendrickson is a tease
Sigh
https://griddle.baseballtoaster.com/archives/725610.html
Looks like you'll have to make a trip up to Oregon now, eh?
It was part defensive replacement, but also Alston had George Shuba pinch hit for Don Zimmer with two on and two out with the Dodgers up 2-0.
Zimmer hit just .239 in the regular season was 2 for 9 in the World Series.
Amoros probably was not starting because he was a lefty and the Yankees were starting a lefty in that game, Tommy Byrne.
In Game 7 of the 1955 World Series, Jackie Robinson didn't play because of a leg injury and Duke Snider and Roy Campanella both had sacrifices.
He should send the O'Malley family a check every year.
I once saw Roger Kahn vandalizing my car.
It was either him or Charles Kuralt.
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/240473.html
Vasgersian's a Trojan and wouldn't be welcomed on campus.
The only reason I ask is that the Chronicle (here in SF) printed Lowe as the starter to tonight's game, and now it appears Lowe won't pitch until Monday.
So now it's:
Billingsley (last start 7/6, 7 days rest)
Penny (7/5, with 1 IP on Tuesday, 9 days rest, sort of)
Tompko (uh...)
Lowe (7/7, 9 days rest)
Hendrickson (7/8, 9 days rest)
So does it make sense to not pitch Lowe, the innings eater, on 6 days rest?
There will be lots of photos of the Mound City on the Griddle in two weeks! Vacation time!
As for why the rotation is set up the way it is, it could have something to do with having the three guys with flyball tendencies (Penny, Bills, Tomko) pitch in a park where flyballs go to die.
Is this another case of the Eisenreich Paradox?
Another Ludlum novel!
I suppose it is nice that I get to see Billingsley start tonight, as I haven't seen him start a game before (live).
Hoping for a 5-2 Dodger win, with the Dodgers scoring first and Alyssa Milano's dopleganger pitching the eighth.
I've seen them crack before:
Baez
Carlyle
Falkenborg
Mulholland
Springer
It's a long list of broken pitchers, who washed ashore on the rocky reefs of Southern California
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.