Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
It's starting. That horrible time of year when any journalist can dream up any trade possibility they like and have thousands upon thousands take them seriously.
No offense, Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News: You are being a simpleton. Your word, not mine.
The Dodgers have a first baseman in James Loney. They do not need to trade him and perhaps the No. 1 left-handed pitching prospect in baseball for another first baseman, even Mark Teixeira. It's not a case of choosing prospects over winning. Of all the positions where the Dodgers have the least potential for improvement, next to catcher, first base might be the tops.
You act as if the Dodgers are shooting themselves in the foot by not making this trade, as if Teixeira comes with a guaranteed World Series title. He doesn't.
You keep pushing this trade, and you need to stop.
* * *
Without fanfare, the Times appears to be upping its pursuit of the gambling reader (there's a joke there somewhere) by starting a general sports betting column, "Behind the Lines," by Bob Mieszerski. In a chart in the print edition, the Times prints the odds for the day's baseball games - I don't think I've ever seen them do that before, either.
* * *
That was ... a lot of hits allowed last night.
Today's 12:10 p.m. game:
Update: The Dodgers have called up Roberto Hernandez to bolster the pitching staff, optioning Tony Abreu to AAA Las Vegas. Hernandez had a 6.23 ERA (70 ERA+) with Cleveland this year, but maybe he can drink from the same waters as Rudy Seanez. As recently as a year ago, Hernandez had a 3.11 ERA and 143 ERA+.
Hernandez probably walks too many guys to be truly effective, but with Mark Hendrickson and Chad Billingsley pitching on back-to-back days in the midst of a strenuous time, I don't know why the Dodgers waited until today to make the move (thus necessitating Jonathan Broxton pitching in garbage time Tuesday). But at least they made it.
GMs that hold on to top prospects in lieu of making a trade for an elite, difference-making talent are abusing their positions
good as Loney is, he won't make a difference in the pennant race this year. Teixeira will
486. Hythloday
I stop paying attention to a blowout and a miss a discussion of empire and philosophy. I guess it serves me right.
No love for Thomas More? But I suppose my bias is evidenced by my handle here. Anyway of the conservative philosophers he is my favorite. Though I enjoy Burke too, but more for his discussion of aesthetics.
In the end rejecting the Enlightenment on the grounds of the preeminence that it gives reason (whether because it leads to a marginalization of god or the unnecessary inhibitions of philosophical inquiry) seems problematic to me. You can't reject "human reason" because we have no insight into any other types of reason. Left as such any conclusions we reach are either reasoned or faithfully accepted. Neither is inherently wrong, but the latter can never lead to a progressive mode of scientific inquiry (i.e. can you reject the centrality of reason on a blog the very existence of which is engineered around scientifically deduced principles?). As I see it we live in a world of reason that allows you the luxury of rejecting it. From this point of view the Enlightenment didn't so much reject the centrality of god as relegate god to his appropriate realm (the metaphysical) in order to simplify the understanding of the physical. If this move isn't made then you constantly have to contend with the slippery slope that leads to al-Ghazali. We all know how that turned out for the Islamic world.
Again I don't mean this to be combative, merely inquisitive.
I forgot today's game was an afternoon one. That's a relief. Now I don't have to stew over last night until 10. I wonder what St. Augustine would think about baseball. Even more interesting, I wonder what Bob Dylan would sing about St. Augustine and baseball. Doubtless he would misuse "whom" in there somewhere.
If he is only a rental I would not want to lose any long-term pieces / prospects so my offer of Betemit and Young wouldn't be enough. See ya in pinstripes Tex.
To the year 3010,
He fought the evil robot king,
And saved the human race again."
It really is annoying when these guys just make stuff up.
I think the big problem is not the form the government should take, though I find these discussions the most interesting, but rather that human society has advanced to a point where discussions of the good life are overwhelmed by the speed of the advancements in technology and the shrinking of the world.
What I mean to say is that I think people should govern themselves in small communities, with an educated and conscientious aristocracy at the lead. This ideology is very Platonic in structure, but the lifestyle I envision is much different.
These things are impossible, though. When someone figures out how to turn off the world's electricity, then I will start to preach my ideas.
I think Plato is right that, in its essence, virtue is only the knowledge of what is right. What he thinks episteme and sophia are is where I begin to have problems.
I wonder if GMs purposefuly initiate "off-the-record" gossip just to be misleading. As I much as I might be suspect of Coletti and the organization about trades (see CMC, Lugo, etc) some rumors just seem so outlandish as to be laughable.
Are you still accepting subscriptions to your newsletter...?
Does "voting" produce a more qualified aristocracy?
Ah, but as I mentioned before, I am simpleton.
What a genius! He hammers home the point that he "is simpleton" by using poor grammar.
Anyway, I call Evan Grant on rules 3, 8 and possibly 11.
vr, Xei
"Alright, Greg, it's your first day of grad school. You have a Sallust seminar at 130 and ancient history seminar at 330, but before that, you have to teach your first western civ class, for which we have provided you with no training, and can you get on the energy crisis?"
Yes, James Loney could develop power in the next year or two and we wouldn't want to miss out on that. But the fact remains that he's 23 and the power hasn't come yet, and Mark Teixeira is a proven power hitter. At age 23, Teixeira hit 26 HR's in the majors, not the 8-10 that Loney will likely record this year. In fact will Loney ever be as good as Teixeira ? Very doubtful. Loney has shown no indication of becoming 35-40 HR hitter that Tex has.
So the question in my view isn't whether Dodgers should trade Loney for Teixeira. If the budget can afford it for next two seasons , Tex is the better solution. The real issue is the second player required to get the deal done. If it means a Kershaw, that's a tough decision. If it's Elbert, pull the trigger.
Yes. In other words, does the current system produce better/more qualified/whatever leaders than would be produced by picking professors and grad students?
4 G I'd forgoten you must be an Eastoner
As to much of this conversation my response, at least in the morning is -huh.......What!
Even with those number I've come to the same conclusion as Jon in that I wouldn't trade Loney for an expensive rental when Loney will be a cheap and productive solution for years. We might live to regret that decision this year but we won't from 2008-2012.
Teixeira is under contract for next year too, so he wouldn't be just a 1/2 season rental. Not that I'm advocating such a thing...
-Evan Grant: Dallas Morning News.
Very simplistic view on things Mr.Grant. Problem is, if life was that simple the Rangers would have won at least 2 W/S with Mr. Tex.
Much to your chagrin, Loney has made a difference so far in this year's pennant race for the Dodgers. His experience during this season, would only garner him much needed pennant race pressure experience, that you speak of down the road. BTW, how many pennant races has Tex been able to significantly alter with his prescence...hmmmm..maybe he is lacking that needed intangible pennant race experience himself. I understand Texiara is an All-star caliber player...but in time so will Loney. Ned's best move is no move on this matter.
Good point. Let's drop the "ruling communities" thing and just focus on the "get paid more" part.
Kemp
Loney
La Roche
Kershaw
Billingsley
Martin - goes without saying
Kershaw
J Bell
Kershaw
What if we just trade 1 of the Kershaws?
Are they above or below oil company executives...?
Turns out it was Gary.
I hate this time of year.
Just call him "the Texas first baseman". He's closely related to "the Colorado center fielder" and "the Chicago White Sox left-handed starter."
Mark Teixeira is worth two World Series rings? I want him on my team!
Teixiera is an elite player, and as the Dodgers payroll slims down with more and more young players, they'll have more and more money to play with. Loney is a good player, but unless he develops some power, he'll never be a superstar at first.
With the lack of power in the organization, the Dodgers might be better served by going for Teixiera, then filling first base with the best hitter on the market after 2008.
I should say that you can call me "The guy who blogs at The Griddle."
What about "Bob"...? (A terrible movie, BTW)
vr, Xei
That should make certain baseball bloggers happy.
It cuts like a knife.
Short term questions:
What is the expected difference between Loney's production and Teixeira's?
What is the expected difference between Meloan's production, and, say, Eric Stults', or whoever Meloan would replace on the Dodgers?
Does the fact that Meloan is a relief pitcher make him the Guillermo Mota of this deal, if you will? Is he, by his nature, a fungible commodity?
Long term question:
A nice part about having Loney is that if he continues to produce at his current pace, he'll be locked in as a quite serviceable first baseman until, what, 2012n If the Dodgers fail to sign Teixeira to a long-term deal after the 2008 season, what other free agents or Dodger prospects could be available?
And I quote: "How does a guy with a career slugging percentage of .367 fall so suddenly to .333?"
Um, that'd be ON-BASE percentage, Bill. Sorry all those anti-DePo columns didn't teach you the difference.
I certainly wouldn't give up Loney and Kershaw, but Loney and anyone else not from the group of [Billingsley, Kemp, Martin, Kershaw] is rather tempting.
Loney: .294/.352/.479
Tex: .289/.385/.547(in Texas, adjust accordingly)
Usual PECOTA disclaimers apply, but those look like decent estimates. (I'd probably give Loney a higher average and keep the slug the same).
If you do look at the PECOTA numbers, this trade suddenly doesn't seem that great. Going by VORP, which is park adjusted, Teixiera is worth only about a win more than Loney next year. Now, a win is a win, but is it worth sacrificing Loney for it?
It might be better to hold onto Loney for now, then trade him if you can get a hold of Miguel Cabrera (in 2009) or A-Rod (after this year), or someone similar.
Furcal, SS
Pierre, CF
Martin, C
Gonzo, LF
Betemit, 3B
Loney, 1B
Ethier, RF
Martinez, 2B
Billingsley, P
1. Which player contributes more on offense: Kemp or Pierre?
2. Which player is the better centerfielder: Kemp or Pierre?
3. If "Kemp, Kemp", why is Pierre playing centerfield everyday?
4. If "Pierre, Pierre", please retire now.
5. If "Pierre, Kemp", please retire now.
6. If "Kemp, Pierre", do you really think "Pierre offense + Pierre defense" is larger than "Kemp offense + Kemp defense"? If so, please retire now.
Home-332/392/396/788
Away-217/246/271/517
All I can say is wow.
61
That is interesting. I started doing the research to back up my initial thought that I would trade Loney for Tex and was surprised to see that I agreed with Jon after the research.
What're the thoughts on Ken Gurnick's suggestion of trading D. Young?
Interesting article about Andre Ethier's improvement since Bill Mueller took over as batting coach for those who haven't checked Dodgers.com yet.
http://tinyurl.com/2cy6v6
Agreed that it's interesting. Next question: Teixeira brings an additional "win" over Loney in that he'll provide about 10 runs more in offense, on average, right?
But is there reason to believe that because he represents such an upgrade in slugging percentage -- 75 points or so -- and this is where the Dodgers are lacking, does it stand to reason that he might be an especially good fit for the Dodgers? Is it possible that for that reason, for the Dodgers specifically, Teixeira might represent an upgrade of more than one win?
If yes -- if it could be two wins this year -- I think I could get on board. If not -- if it's just a one-win upgrade -- I'm not a fan of it.
Nomar Garciaparra, meet Ervin Santana.
Even 788 OPS isn't that good for a third baseman, though, is it?
-----------------------
I think, as a general rule, it's a bad idea to trade cheap, young good players for older more expensive players, even if they're slightly better. But if the older player is significantly better ... maybe.
I wouldn't be horrified at a trade of Loney for Teixeira straight up, though I wouldn't like it, in large part for irrational reasons. I sure would be horrified if a real prospect was included in such a deal.
>>> "Hopefully I'll have a couple more outings and go from there," he said. "(The Dodgers) told my agent and myself to 'get your arm ready and we'll try to get you up as soon as possible.' " <<<
http://www.lvrj.com/sports/8569482.html
69 Again, signed through 2008.
I think I need to write another e-mail. This guy is a tool. Kershaw and Loney?
Pierre: 34 starts, 157 PA, .317/.349/.379
Gonzo: 30 starts (+1 at DH; 33 games total), 132 PA, .284/.371/.457
Kemp: 19 starts (33 games), 93 PA, .368/.409/.575
Ethier: 19 starts (33 games), 93 PA, .364/.473/.506
OK, since Tex represents an upgrade of only (about) one win, I am officially off the Loney-for-Teixeira train. Alert the media.
Meloan, yes, I guess I consider him a real prosect, because of all the buzz about him being able to help this year, but maybe better to ask a real prospect maven. He is only a relief pitcher ... but if they traded Meloan it would be awful if they turned around and traded for Dotel or something ... well that would be awful anyway.
I love the Bull as much as anyone -- but if Jonathan Broxton was the key player for any game-changing talent, I would make that trade in a heartbeat.
Broxton is great at his job, fun to watch, has a great nickname, and if you emptied out his body cavity, you could fit three of me inside of him, but he is a relief pitcher. Unless he pitches like Gagne v. 2003, he is tradable.
No it's not, but it is a far cry from the worse hitter in baseball and the 4th best option at 3b which has been touted by one particular baseball organization.
A novel approach would be to put Nomar on the DL before a long road trip.
So I get the increase from 15 to 20 HR. He cools off a bit, but Texas masks it.
But do you really think he could double his doubles production?
Mark Teixeira = Two World Series Rings!
Small price to pay, if you ask me. We should throw in Meloan.
But Nomar is not the worst hitter in the major leagues. He should not, however, be playing this much. He'd be a superb utility guy. One of the best.
Bob or Regarfield has any Los Angeles Dodger ever had a difference of 280 points in OPS between home and away at the end of a season who had more then 300 plate appearances? I think were looking at something historical here.
1. The hopes that they look clever for picking the Dbax in the case that all of the rookies explode.
2. Pure Dodger-hating
PETCO Park. Go Figure.
Not a Dodger, but he played at Dodger Stadium.
Behold Leon Wagner of the Angels in 1963.
Road OPS - 937
Home OPS - 658
Difference of 279.
Wagner's home/road split of 1963 was one of the greatest ever seen I believe.
24 homers on the road and 2 at home.
"The Yankees are interested in acquiring Betemit from the Dodgers, the New York Post reports. The Yanks tried to get Betemit last year from the Braves, but he ended up being traded to LA, and now they are trying again. The Dodgers are looking for bullpen help and Scott Proctor's name has been floated around, but they are not too high on any of the Yanks' relievers."
As a DH? Or a 2B?
I do understand, especially given the idea that Andy is going to be the guy.
As the pitching staff currently stands I would not argue with your description but by Aug 1st I think you'll see an improvement in the rotation and the everyday lineup will start to jell. It is not a jump for me to think that Arizona is a contender. The best scenario for me is that they move some their talented kids in an attempt to win the division but fall short. Even as the 1st wave has underperformed (Quentin, Drew, Jackson, Young) they have a 2nd wave ready to throw at the NL in Upton, Carter, Gonzalez and the recently signed number one pick from 2006 is opening some eyes.
We probably wouldn't, given Management's apparent lack of appreciation for Betemit's value.
I like Broxton and I hope to like Meloan, but if they are in the vein of Rivera-Hoffman-etc and show continued success year after year after year, they will be the exception, not the rule... and because of that, if we can get a game-changing talent for these kind of guys, I think you've got to do it.
Furcal, SS
Pierre, CF
Martin, C
Gonzo, LF
Betemit, 3B
Loney, 1B
Ethier, RF
Martinez, 2B
Billingsley, P
______________________________________________
Martin is back in action witch is cool & i've heard Ethier is tearing it up of late.
Thanks Bob
Daniel probably doesn't remember back in 1990 when Vin went into a long paean over recently retired Union Oil exec Fred Hartley.
Dark indeed.
Why the idea that LA can only trade young players?
i stand corrected how soon do i forget he hits jacks & gets on base for us.
"If only we had signed Gil Meche ..."
(He has gotten hit hard in his past two starts, though.)
In some ways, it is probably more to the norm of what the Arizona guys are doing this year vs. Martin, Ethier, Billingsley and Broxton in their second seasons and Kemp and Loney in their what appears to be permanent status on the big club. Generally if you get an All-Star, a reliable regular (Ethier and I know Brock will contest this if Ethier is playing a corner OF spot), a potential top line starter and a solid setup guy, you should be thrilled, but to also have another pretty solid regular prospect (Loney) and a high ceiling guy (Kemp) also on the team should make you delirous because that just doesn't happen too often in baseball.
Those six names (who cost less than Brett Tomko) should be on Ned's voice mail as if you are asking for anyone of these guys, please hang up now.
They represent possibly the greatest flow of talent since the '70s and while none have exploded like Fernando or Piazza, I think this is a special time in Dodger land and I hope the powers that be recognize it.
Because Ned wants to win this year, and it's Common Knowledge™ that young players can't play as well as old players in the post-season.
But I want to win every year. They could really get something for Kent while his numbers still look pretty good.
Play Betemit at second.
Edmonds and Toguchi were two of them, I think. You can figure out the rest. DHs and pitchers not included.
Actually, PECOTA has Teixeira at 23 WARP (park-adjusted) and Loney at 15 WARP from 2008-2011, which is more like 2 wins per year. To be sure, Teixeira will cost about $ 50-55 million more in that timeframe and maybe that money could be better diverted elsewhere. But PECOTA also assumes Loney's Isolated Power jumps to 190 levels (and he hits 17-20 HRs pr yr) from 2008-2011. If, however, Loney's power stays closer to the 150 ISO level he's had over 670 PA's in Las Vegas, then knock off another win per yr from his estimate.
If Loney is a .300/.370/.500 guy from here on, that's a fine solution at 1b at a cheap price for the future. If he's more like a .285/.355/.440 guy (which he very well could be), then it's not worth a lot of hand-wringing about trading him. My guess is that he's somewhere in between meaning that if the second prospect involved to a deal for Tex isn't too weighty, then let's consider as a reasonable idea.
Also, Jeff Kent is having a pretty good year for us and for those to dismiss him I think are doing so without really looking at his performance.
Betemit isn't going to play everyday short of Nomar getting hurt and even if that were to happen, LaRoche would be back. He's got a job as a spot starter and lefty pinch hitter for now.
I don't know where he plays if he were traded to the Yanks unless they think he can play first base.
Go Roberto!
The Yankees have GAPING holes at short and third!
It is easier to trade cheap youngster then expensive veterans on the downside of their careers. Do you think anyone is clamoring for Kent or Nomar compared to the guys calling for Kemp/Loney and so forth.
That's good news for Rays. They need somebody in the bullpen who can get people out.
Neds made some bone head moves but i think he's a smart guy & knows he'll be crucified if he trades top young talent for a playoff run rental some of his quotes scare me some times i must admit.
As to the debate about Loney and Teixeira, everyone has pretty much agreed with Jon, Teixeira is likely to be better than Loney over the next two years, and most everyone agrees that Kershaw is too high a price to pay for the difference in performance plus the cheap extra years of Loney, so what is everyone arguing about anyway?
So, because "that's what we have," we have to make stupid trades? I don't agree.
Also, Kent has been good, but he is still being out OPS'd by Betemit, and I know Betemit can at least make every play at 2B that Kent can.
It doesn't have to be the Yankees. Trade Kent for two good prospects and we won't have to worry about being stuck with his corpse next year.
SS Furcal 10+ HR (Hu in 09)
C Martin 15+ HR
1B Loney 15+ HR
CF Kemp 30ish HR?
3B LaRoche 20 HR
RF Either 15+ HR
2B Betemit 20 HR (or Abreu)
LF D Young 15 HR?
7 position players homegrown (8 if you insert Abreu, all 9 after Hu takes over for Furcal)
This is a playoff contending team for the next 5-6 years at least, right?
Has this happened before in the modern era of baseball?
And where is the shortage of power? All the youngsters can hit for extra base power.
If you are in Vegas, you could see the acrobatic pairing of Abreu and Hu again, they have not been paired since their days in Vero Beach.
Betemit is a higher OPS than Kent, yes he does .844 to .832 in less plate appearances. Jeff Kent is still among the top second base men in the league, I don't know why people want him off the Dodgers.
I don't want Kent off the Dodgers, but I'd rather he be off the Dodgers than anyone whose name has come up in trade rumours.
Betemit might play 2B better than Kent without significant decrease in offense.
Betemit costs less than Kent; if budget is a factor, and if my previous point is true, then Kent's salary might be better applied elsewhere.
That's all I got. Not sure point one is correct.
that sounds aggressive i hope i'm miss reading your comment. :o)
I would want Teixeira at third and Loney at first. I would guess both LaRoche and Betemit could play first and if the Yankees want Betemit perhaps the pitcher they would caugh up could go to Texas along with LaRoche and Young for Teixeira. If Teixeira can play third maybe MacDonald could be included.
Gotta love this split. Teixeira has hit 153 home runs with 112 coming left handed and only 41 right handed but he has an OPS right handed of 949 compared to 891 left handed. Go figure.
Also, if profs were part of the ruling aristocracy presumably some of their tenure requirements would shift from publishing to service. I am not sure if that's an improvement.
With Abreu gone, Ramon figures to get a nice uptick in playing time. Does anyone know what kind of shortstop Abreu is? If he's a capable backup, I would've much preferred to just see Ramon bite the dust.
I have to work on the night of July 31. There will likely be a bunch of trades that I will be trying to squeeze in that night.
Last year, I went on vacation during the trading deadline.
I suppose you probably want the Dodgers to win, too.
I really hope Matt Kemp hits 2 homers today.
yes
maybe it was a typo from gameday, are you fallowing the game thrue gameday?
Oh, maybe Gameday confused me.
Well, the pitcher will think the same way, so sometimes managers won't let Pierre steal and let the pitcher play mind games with himself.
If those are the 3 pitchers who don't pay attention to runners, that says a lot. To me, at least.
He complains a lot. He complains when he's taken out of games. He complains when the defense isn't perfect. He complains when his routine is disrupted by a few minutes. He complains about run support.
However, Peter Gammons has a golden idol made of him.
Dodgers - 3 hits equals 1 run.
Phillies - 1 swing equals tie game.
Gaston told Mussina he wouldn't pitch. And because of that whole fiasco, the All-Star Game disintegrated into "let's get everybody to play" and the All-Star game went from a Moliere style farce to becoming the Gong Show.
Big difference in getting everyone to play and playing the players from the host team.
Cal Ripken started the game and got three ABs.
You can try all you want ToyCannon, but I'm backing Gaston instead of Mussina all the way.
AKA the "Sub 700 Club"
He's big in the ESPN strongest man competition kind of way
The New York Yankees might want to pencil in pitcher Mike Mussina for some sensitivity training after he complained about Sunday's pre-game tribute to Jays broadcaster Tom Cheek.
Mussina was visibly upset that the touching ceremony, which left hardly a dry eye in the SkyDome, ran an extra 15 minutes longer than planned.
"I congratulate the man who got 4,300 games, but sitting for 15 extra minutes before the game was supposed to start - that was worse," Mussina was quoted as saying in New York's Newsday.
"You try to stay away from that," he said. "When you do stuff like that, you're always risking injury to a position player that's totally unnecessary if you can avoid it. We've got guys who can do it. James Loney can do it. He could probably get outs some days better than the other guys."
Indeed, Loney considered himself a better pitching prospect than hitting first baseman until his senior year of high school, when his bat caught up with his arm. Scouts were torn which role offered him the best future, but Dodgers scouting director Logan White picked Loney in the first round as a first baseman.
Loney said he didn't volunteer to pitch on Tuesday night but felt he didn't need to.
"They know I'm ready," he said, drawing laughter from Chad Billingsley at the neighboring locker.
He lost the ball momentarily in the crisp blue sky & then recovered nicely
Anyway, Kemp would have caught that.
Martin then made a nice play to catch a foul ball.
Dodgers went out 1-2-3 in the bottom of the 3rd.
1 out in the 4th & a squip single by a phillies player with the pitcher coming up to bat it should be a descent inning for Bills.
Arguably, in just the past month, the Dodgers have replaced Randy Wolf and Hong-Chih Kuo on the roster with James Loney and Matt Kemp. Is it any wonder that the team's trade amibitions have shifted?
Also what is the deal with Dodger pitchers and shoulder injuries this year? Elbert,Schmidt,Wolf,Tsao
i havent been around for a few days but didn't we have a nice 5 game run? i understand the sentiment on bringing a new pitcher (i wouldn't do it) but i understand it, i feel like we gotta be patient.
With a bonnet!
It's all Conte's fault!
BTW - Ervin "I love Angel Stadium" Santana was just sent down to Salt Lake City. Expect their lefty yo-yo, but he has done well when asked, Joe Saunders to be brought up.
Hendrickson and Tomko are aging, hopeless pitchers with a long track record of failure. Chad is a young pitcher with great stuff that just needs some tuning. They are nowhere near the same thing.
3.5!
I didn't think that Plaschke could be so brutally honest about likable player of Nomar's fame.
aside from Steiner everybody kind of figured Tsao was gonna get hurt.
WOO! Ethier helps the Dodgers take the lead with a four bagger. woot!
That's Conventional Wisdom speaking. I'd rather face two pitchers with the bases loaded than a 4th outfielder with runners on 1st and 2nd.
you called it Brock!
I'm actually quite fond of it.
But I'll take it!
Oh, play a slumping Gonzo and a whatever Pierre everyday no matter what.
Oh how I wish we could trade Pierre and Nomar for Javier Vazquez.
Jerry: Hey Andre, get the hell off the phone...!
Yep. Management pretty much ranks our outfielders thusly:
1. Pierre
.
.
.
.
2. LuGo
3. Kemp/Ethier
Thanks,
The Management.
Better that than his 4th dinger of the series! I feel thankful.
That means Tomko and Hendrickson get two more starts each.
i feel like i have to provide an opposing viewpoint when there are people ready to lump him into the tomko/hendrickson folder.
It looks like Grady wants Bills to go out there one more inning it looks like.
.301 / .367 / .459 / .826
(FWIW, it wouldn't matter if it was Tomko pitching, I'd hope the same thing.)
I'll take that back he was still seating down when the other Dodgers were running to the field.
Pretty meek inning there.
I know, thats at least two ifs.
Jon - you should update that piece and publish it in a Fungos article, I think you can use the bullpen construction of Dodgers and Padres as examples of mixing and matching guys that you find during the off-season.
Just a suggestion, but I think it was really a nice article.
Seanez:2007::Saito:2006?
Unless they flip Loney to the Yankees for pitchers.
Gonzo, Gonzo!
Serving all your goat needs:
http://www.farmanimalshelters.org/care_goat.htm
The fancy Gameday has Loney batting lefthanded.
I would think that an infield rotation of Loney/Kent/Furcal/Nomar/Abreu/Betemit could find enough at-bats so that no one is wasting away on the bench.
kind of.
Valdez is younger & cheaper nough said
That's what we thought after the home opener in 2005.
Current futility not withstanding, Martinez is probably a better hitter than Valdez. A guy who puts the ball in play as often as Ramon should not be hitting .164.
but you gotta think RM2 will stay over calling up Valdes
They both are "not young", cheap, and thoroughly untalented.
yeah i thought about that to late, i'd submitted by post already.
"With eight infielders on the roster and the success of the recent alignment with James Loney at first base and Nomar Garciaparra at third, playing time for the 22-year-old Abreu had pretty much disappeared."
How does Nomar get any credit for the recent "success?" His contribution is completely negative -- getting out of Loney's way. The logic of Gurnick's sentence would be unchanged if he'd written it this way:
"With eight infielders on the roster and the success of the recent alignment with James Loney at first base and Paris Hilton out of jail, playing time for the 22-year-old Abreu had pretty much disappeared."
And I like Broxton too. Sweet pitching.
those Philly fans are truly fanatical on certain players aren't they. He's a nice complimentary LF'er with good pop no?
"With eight infielders on the roster and the success of the recent alignment of Nomar Garciaparra at third and Paris Hilton out of jail, playing time for the 22-year-old Abreu had pretty much disappeared."
He has lost a lot of pop this year, but he still gets on-base a lot.
That comment is not really fair cause Ramon nailed it. But all the same.
I don't think I will, thanks
395 - that was in reference to RM2 grounding out, not to 393.
393 - Fine minds think alike.
I disagree. A better hitter would have a better chance of getting hit. Even off the bench.
i think it's safe to say we all agree on that.
I hope we win the World Series this year.
I doubt he'll spend a day in prison.
Are they lower then the people who abuse people?
My favorite reality show would be to round up the wealthy slugs who shoot big game animals in pens and call it hunting. Then take those fella's and take away the guns and then put them in the same pens with the big game animals. A good size Liger would do the trick since he's plenty ticked off about how he was created in the 1st place.
Unfortunately, I think it was just an accident this time.
.103/.212/.172
Now there's a reality show I could get excited about.
Seanez, Beimel, Broxton and Saito. Faced 13 batters, 1 hit.
I'll see y'all later.
6 years in prison and a fine is the max.
ha.
"Vick's problems would seem to be plentiful now that he has gone from a person of interest in local and federal investigations to one of four men charged in U.S. District Court in Richmond, Va., with conspiracy to commit interstate commerce in aid of unlawful activities and to sponsor a dog in an animal-fighting venture. On the Travel Act portion of the conspiracy charges, he faces a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The dogfighting charges carry a possible sentence of one year in prison, a $100,000 fine or both."
He did it, he's a sadist and a scumbag, and I hope he has a tender and caring cellmate. If he goes to jail. Which he probably won't.
I also wonder if Saito realized there was a pitchout call. That pitch was right in the center of the strike zone.
Inexcusable.
Betemit shouldn't be traded for a reliever.
Cesar Millan ain't writing any fan letters to him any time soon, but seriously that's pretty sick stuff. You can say the same thing about cock fights i saw a cock fight once when i was 15yrs old in Guadalajara, Mex.
A reliever won today's game, while Betemit only got a couple hits...
We like Billingsley. We want him to get wins (even if he doesn't deserve it).
But I don't want to get it wrong.
3 hours?
Somebody help me out here.
Presumably, an editor will catch that during the next rewrite.
For people who view capital punishment as a deterrent, why not just make it one dog?
The leader of this bandwagon from the start has been Tony Jackson, who never misses an opportunity to say something bad about Billingsley. Even after his last start, when he threw 6 shutout innings, Jackson managed to complain that "he typically fell behind in counts and threw too many pitches."
i saw the article on primer stating that a computer (!!!) found Edwar.
That's pretty much how I am with everything. But I'm waiting for Slate to tell me that dog-fighting is actually pretty cool.
And Ethier can't play center. He just can't. For obvious reasons that nobody can figure out.
Jackson doesn't like Billingsley because Chad once cut in front of him in line to get an elevator.
I heard that Jackson was on the elevator first, and Chad made him vacate.
---------------
During his offseasons, though he didn't need the money, Freeman kept in shape by working as a stoker in the boiler room of a local silk mill. He spent much of his time cockfighting, and became well known as a breeder of fighting birds, keeping a flock of more than 100 gamecocks in his barn. (He insisted the best type of fighting bird was a cross between a Hopkinson warhorse cock and a white hackle hen.) Even a 1937 police raid on a cockfight at Freeman's home did not deter him. "I'd walk 20 miles to see a good cockfight," he once said. In October 1906, Freeman purchased the New Haven Blues of the Connecticut League; by 1910 the team had been renamed the Prairie Hens.
-------------------
(Of course, even today, it's perfectly acceptable for people to treat chickens cruelly, as long as they intend to eventually turn them into nuggets.)
Also Chad took the last seat on a Delta flight and bumped Jackson on to a different airline.
That being said, Vick has already been found guilty in the Court of Public Opinion and arguably that'll be worse than anything he's actually convicted of. However, the feds usually don't indict unless they have a strong case.... so I think Vick is in for a world of trouble.
Well then, you should probably steer clear of all videos on Youtube containing dolphins.
obviously your joking i'm sure you don't like watching blood & death (real death) unfold before your eyes. i'm telling you it's really really sick stuff when you think about it specially what's going on inside that football players coconut when he watches it all unfold.
Illusions, Greg. You rank animals by how well they can do illusions.
IP-4
ER-0
Hits-1
K-4
BB-0
Nice job!
vr, Xei
honestly, what are you expecting? A 22yr old to put up Pedro Martinez type numbers in his first full season?
I know. Money...or candy...
Go out there and win a Cy Young you loafer!
That's about as false as a statement gets. Look at the stats in 476. Billingsley has been putting up outstanding numbers in the majors for over a year, at an age when most players are still in Class A ball. He's done better than many if not most Hall of Fame pitchers did at the same age.
I hear you, TC.
BTW: Have you ever flown a commercial chopper in Hawai'i...?
Plus, have you ever tasted dog? Man, it's terrible.
If humans had multiple stomachs like cows and became ruminants, we'd never need to take lunch breaks and we could all stay in our seats for an entire baseball game without getting up for food.
Mmm.... Cud ..... Mmm....
Plus you get the spit thing as a bonus.
I wonder what our record is when Nomar is a starter and when he isn't? I saw something about us being 7-7 while at 3b.
Kent has never been much of a pinch hitter, as someone pointed out. It puzzled me why Vin assumed that Kent would be pinch hitting if Abreu were still around, before Abreu got inserted at 2nd. Surely Abreu would simply have been substituted directly for Martinez. We'd have been better off with that option, but fortunately Saito saved the day, as he usually does. And I'm sure they will need Hernandez (or a better 12th pitcher) to stretch out an inning, do garbage duty, etc., so it made sense to send Abreu down to make way.
Would it have been better to keep Abreu up and release Martinez? Abreu is not so versatile defensively, plus it's probably better for him to get to play every day down in Vegas. Now that Betemit is playing better again, he's not a liability: he can be played every time he's needed, even if Nomar is sat down more and more frequently, as is likely.
This is what I mean by horn-tooting. His pitching performance today and this kind of accolade seem incongruous. I am not saying he won't be a great pitcher; I am just saying that -- unlike some of you -- I am not ready to crown him the golden child given his inconsistency.
Saenz is having a pretty poor season off the bench as well, but at least he has a track record of driving in runs. Martinez has always been relegated to serviceable bench player status, but at this point I think he's dropped below even those low expectations.
If Martinez is gone, who will we see? Abreu again would be the obvious answer, but come call-ups time will they bring up Hu, LaRoche, and Young as well?
Gonzalez is at least honest about how he feels about Arizona. When asked if it hurts to see Arizona on a cold streak right now, Gonzalez said something like "Are you kidding, I check the scoreboard 12 times a night and it breaks my heart when they lose (sarcastic tone) you bet I keep up with what they are doing."
I can appreciate someone who doesn't dance around the question, there is no doubt he wanted to retire as a D-Back and he lets people know how he feels about it.
in his blog... www.insidesocal.com/dodgers
In Chad's last 4 starts (I am not sure if he is fully stretched out yet) he has gone 23 innings or at least 5 in all and given up 7 runs. Is that so inconsistent?
The Padre Ace Peavy: in his last 4 games has thrown 25 innings and has given up 10 runs. Is he inconsistent?
Well then the difference appears to be that you are judging him based on a game or two, while the rest of us are judging him based on his extensive track record over a number of years.
Look, nobody's inducting him into the Hall of Fame just yet. Nobody's giving him credit for things he hasn't done. Giving him credit for the things he has ALREADY done is enough. And what he has done is pitch better in the majors at a young age than about 98% of pitchers in the history of baseball.
If not, dish the guy and get something back because he doesn't have a place on the diamond. We've pretty much locked in on the future position players. Bring him up to hit or file the guy and let him play elsewhere.
516 -- Why couldn't Young be the next Olmedo? I just don't think streaky hitters who whiff a lot and don't walk that much make effective pinch hitters. I could be wrong about that, but my intuition says otherwise.
http://www.tangotiger.net/mgl/uzr2007_07_09.csv
Whereas +/- really likes Ethier, UZR is not really a fan (it gives him +3 per 150 games, the same rating as Gonzo). It also doesn't like Loney (-10 per 150 games). Kent is at -35, Pierre -9, Betemit -24, Nomar -7 at 1st and -1 at 3rd (and most impressive, +3 at 1st for Toronto), and Furcal +16, all per 150 games.
Of course people look at Peavy and go, ah he is just having a tough few games. Same people look at Chad and wonder what the hype is about. That's all I was trying to say.
What we really need right now is a good Greg Brock rant against the "inconsistency" bugaboo. C'mon, Greg. Step up to the plate.
Who cares if a player is inconsistent? What matters at the end of the day is the sum total of what a player does. It doesn't matter HOW he did it, it just matters that he DID do it. Consistency is not inherently better than streakiness. In fact, Bill James in one of his old abstracts did a study showing that, given two players with approximately the same stats, the streaky player is actually MORE valuable than the consistent one.
Consistency is one of the big fallback words of baseball ignorance. (And, please, rest assured that I'm not trying to pick on any one person.) It's a cliche that is utterly devoid of meaning, and belongs on the same scrap heap as "intangibles," "veteran presence," and "hasn't proven himself."
Inconsistency is not only just as valuable as consistency -- inconsistency is exactly what makes baseball exciting. Instead of hitting exactly one home run every four games, Shawn Green hit four in one game. Instead of giving up exactly 5.8 hits in every start, Sandy Koufax threw four no-hitters. Instead of hitting 38 homers every year of his career, Mark McGwire hit 70 in one season.
But yeah, consistency...grrrrrrrr
{shakes fist}
Delwyn's record is better in every respect except for the strikeouts.
not....goood.
Speaking of which, I hope the umpire's OK.
Michael Barrett missed time last year with an intrascrotal hematoma.
https://griddle.baseballtoaster.com/archives/524960.html
He seemed so angelic as a kid:
http://tinyurl.com/33ctet
I'm sure Shimmin watched it.
I heard Vin say early in the game how roster moves sent Abreu," who is a great young player with a big future with the D's", back to Vegas. I have been amazed in the past week at the overt support Vin has shown for our young players. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised, for more than me, Vin comes from a time when players mostly came from a teams system, and it was far more satisfying to have a "Dodger" than some hired gun.
I'm still not sure about Q&A. In general, CSPAN seems to be letting more cranks on as guests than they used to. It used to be you could close your eyes and tell whether a caller was talking or the guest was, by whether the person was a lunatic. Now you've got to keep an eye on it.
Why can't things be like they used to be?
Young before this season has an OPS of .856 in about 2400 appearances (its higher now), he strikes out around 22% of the time and walks about 8% of the time.
54-41 Dodgers
51-41 Padres
49-44 Cubs
50-45 Braves
lets just leave the all star catcher alone.
Is Pierre's consecutive game streak really that much of an accomplishment that he can't take his turn in the outfield rotation with the other 3?
In general, Slate does not like any form of basketball that involves defense.
http://www.slate.com/id/2170558/pagenum/2/
The only breaks he's getting are off-days and DHing.
speaking of tricks...
Lets go Denny Grenn on McDonald and crown his ass.
"true that" TC, it's pretty weird cause i like a nicely cooked Pollo Loco any day. :o) i think if i had a chick who was a peta lover i'd probably be hosed into becoming a vegetarian i'm easily persuade some times.
I still remember your impassioned plea for folks to be nice even if he hard a time when he was first called up.
Very kind.
http://tinyurl.com/2ju5dl
Actually, you don't have to touch first if you get hit by a pitch and you're hurt. I don't think Ray Chapman did back in 1920.
http://tinyurl.com/3xgal8
Andrew, I'm not sure I can buy into the seriousness of your envy for midwesterners.
He didn't pass away until later that evening I believe.
We will reply with inside jokes about Jack Stephan Plumbing.
Don't misunderstand me, I think our D Young would be fine as a replacement for the Tomato but I've always liked the guy so I want more for him then just a PH gig for the Dodgers. To me he is Dmitri Young when Dmitri wasn't so fat and didn't have the personal problems. If I had my way my 2008 OF would be Ethier/Kemp/Young but I'm not sure Young will have enough bat his 1st few years to warrant a starting gig on a contending team.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGiCXimV5Dc
It also turns out that I have more in common with birds than I'd guessed. Which reminds me, all of the love and respect for animals shown in this thread is fine, so long as we can all agree that crows aren't eligible for any of it. S'alright?
Someone called the library asking for the phone number to Jack Stephan Plumbing because they said they could not find it in the yellow pages.
I am not making this up.
Oh-Oh-Oh-OH-Oh
Oh-Oh-OH-Oh
Oh-Oh-Oh-OH-Oh
The Wright stuff!
David Wright hits a 3-run HR to ties it at 4-4 in the 8th.
622,624 Stephen...Errrric Stephen. Except I pronounce it "Steven".
Kali will visit you in your dreams tonight.
Except he might be a little better.
615- If quality start percentage floats your boat, okay, but he's started six games this year, and was only allowed to throw more than eighty pitches in four of them. He has two quality starts in those four games.
How the mighty have fallen.
Big Shawn, BUNTS?"
"It's a big stew here and we're trying to get the best recipe we can," Ethier said. "Hopefully, I stay a piece of it and make this the best-tasting stew we can get."
I believe the Dodgers have announced that they are calling up top prospect Dinty Moore from Las Vegas.
specially when they poop on your head & hot chicks watch it all unfold.
bravo
Let's get serious here. Chick was a great basketball announcer. Vin Scully might be the finest broadcaster, in any form, in television history.
I haven't read the thread yet so I don't know if this has been mentioned but Vin Scully's call of the umpire getting hit during the botched pitchout was masterful. As a former sportscaster, I was blown away. Yes, the ump had the presence of mind to call the pitch a strike but Vin had the presence of mind to call attention to it while the play was in progress. I cannot tell you hard that is. I just saw Fernando Vina and Karl Ravech mutilate that play on ESPN and they were doing the highlights.
A pitchout. The pitch hits the umpire. The umpire calls a strike. The runner holds at second... Scully called all of it to perfection.
I'll say it again... I haven't listened to the Lakers on radio since Chick left. I won't finish the thought.
I feel about Vin and Chick the same way as the voters. For me it is just about a dead heat but if I had to choose which one to listen to on my death bed, it would be Chick doing game 6 of the 1980 championship.
Top ten episode, for sure.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
that k-rate has to catch up to him sometime though right?
The guy throws shot-puts. And he's like 27 years old.
I'd probably be willing do make the trade because we have decent 3B/2B depth and could use a young starter. However, I don't think the Yanks would trade Wang for a guy whose main role would be to play 2nd once a week and carry Arod's jock. Still, anyone who can keep balls on the ground, even with a poor K rate, can do fairly well in Dodger Stadium.
But the Yanks would be fools to do that deal. I'd go Betemit and DeWitt for Wang.
Anyways, that is the only type of trade I would deal Betemit in; a reliable innings eater who's still a couple years away from free agency. Hes worth more then middle relievers.
Let's go ahead and trade some prospects for other guys. DeWitt, Young, Hu (I know you guys like Hu, you'll get over it) Mattingly, and other dudes for more awesome other dudes. The Dodgers are not going to play nine guys from the organization. That never happens. Let's start dishing the second-tier guys for other players.
Nate, we need to get together and get sideways on hippie lettuce. You, me, trainwreck, and some A-1 Yoda. We might figure solve every problem in baseball. Or just get stupid.
Either way, this needs to happen.
Tony Jackson not letting up...
That said, A-1 Yoda is wonderful.
Is Ethier on the top-tier or second-tier list. In terms of pure talent, I'd place him on the second-tier, but since he's already with the big club with experience, I'd be resitant to move him, for the sake of this year.
And how is Mattingly doing? Last I heard, he's not doing too well.
If he was a CF, he would be great. But he's not. He can't play CF, because people tell us he can't play CF. He can't hit enough to be a corner outfielder, but we play him in RF. I have yet to hear a convincing argument why Ethier can't play CF, but we all accept that he can't play center. Dude is not a corner outfielder, and can't play center for some magical reason.
I guess Ethier is too slow to play center. Or he some magical curse that prevents him from playing center. Or something else. But Ethier can't play center. It would ruin the world.
I know high school and college teachers that partake in the silliness. One did teach history by the way.
I think he's already reached his ceiling, or at least is almost there. And players with his ceiling (15-20 HR, .280) are pretty confusing.
Now, if we're being honest, I don't believe in that particular law, so I ignore it. But I don't let my students know. I partake in the silliness quite often.
Leave the silliness to the grownups.
Downing glasses of whiskey is okay, no matter who you are. Partaking in the silliness needs to be the work of successful people, because the silliness has a negative stigma. I'd prefer that the silliness be the choice of successful people. The silliness has such a bad rap.
btw, he's totally cute (have i mentioned this? mark my words, you're going to see a lot of girls at dodger stadium wearing #16. call it the jeter effect.)
And Mark Hendrickson is the 8th best lefthander in the NL.
also, are you suggesting that ops does not matter? if so, that's a pretty strange argument coming from a sabremetric baseball fan who is also a mathematician.
Nomar has no trade value
Loney, Martin, Kemp will not get traded
Gonzo has no trade value
Pierre has no trade value
So unless your going to trade pitching for pitching, Ethier would seem to be the best trading chip the Dodgers have on the major league roster. That doesn't mean we don't like him or don't appreciate his value. It just means we have a ready replacement for him in Kemp, with D Young ready to step up as the 4th outfielder and that we need some rotation help if Wolf is unable to pitch at his April/May levels.
I see tons of Ethier jerseys out there on the ladies. The high pitched cheers for the man when he comes to the plate is also a dead giveaway.
"Maddux had thrown just 65 pitches -- 49 for strikes -- and allowed four singles through five innings when he told manager Bud Black that he was tired and had felt something in his left hamstring."
What was that? A ballplayer who felt it was better to NOT play through the pain. What a revelation. Wish some of our dodgers (and former dodgers) would take a lesson from Maddux.
It was considered not the most meaningful description.
That can't be right.
Drink up!
D4p - more Boras stuff over at "Soul of Baseball".
I guess since yesterday's Dodgers game started at 12:10 PT, there's not much to complain about.
Boston Marathon is on Patriots Day in April
As far as Ethier I don't understand the talk that he can't be a corner outfielder. He isn't going to hit more than 15-20 HR's, but he can play both corner outfield spots pretty well and his OPS speaks for itself. I can see him being a 320 - 330 hitter no problem, except for his post-shoulder injury last year and his slow start this year, he is about there.
Both he and Kemp are making it extremely difficult to keep Pierre in the lineup every day. Betemit is as well at 3rd and with Abreu down now, hopefully we'll see Wilson at 2nd some now instead of Martinez. I'm hoping that was the thought. Pierre needs some days off and Grittles can pinch run him if he wants to keep his consecutive games streak alive.
He struggled, put up too high a pitch count, yada yada. But the silver lining in the high pitch count is that building it makes him more likely to go deeper in other games, when he does have his great stuff. Also, he was facing a pretty potent lineup.
And the ability to win--or at least not lose--when a pitcher doesn't have his best stuff is a hallmark of a major league winner.
There will be other times when he struggles but loses. All pitchers have them. But the way he handled yesterday as well as past starts when he hasn't been at his best but still mostly kept the team in the game bodes very, very well for the future.
If this is about as bad as he usually will be, what's his best going to look like? I'm eager to see it.
"I couldn't get the right release point on my fastball," he said. "I didn't have a good feel for it."
So he flip-flopped his routine.
"I came with the off-speed pitches first," he said, "and the fastball later in the count. It's the opposite of what I normally do."
Also, if you've not seen Jerry Crowe's column in the LATimes, it's a nice read. "Text messages from the press box", an ode/update to Mallamud's "Notes on a scorecard" (get it?)
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-crowe19jul19,1,5318732.story?coll=la-headlines-sports&ctrack=7&cset=true
If the Dodgers were to trade somebody for a starting pitcher that might make a difference I might offer Furcal to Boston if I knew more about Hu's ability and readiness or thought Abreu could suffice at short the rest of the way.
Back in May and June, I was hoping that Ethier would begin hitting to re-establish his trade value. But now that he is hitting, I don't want to trade him anymore.
And Ethier can't play centerfield because that's where Pierre plays.
How great is that? There's much more of course.
http://thesoulofbaseball.blogspot.com/
I remember now.
I still cringe at Ned making a trade for a starter even though we probably need one. We will pay a lot for someone mediocre I'm sure if he does pull the trigger. Next week and a half will be interesting.
Because of this, he walks a very fine line between solid player, and worthless. If he hits .300, he's a fine player. If one less hit falls every two weeks, he drops into .270/.320/.410 territory, and that doesn't help anyone.
Really? I can think of several contenders who have holes at 2b and would probably jump at him if given a chance. Think he wouldn't put SD or Cleveland over the top? Or the Angels, even, given Kendrick's issues?
I'm not even suggesting we trade him, because we can't sacrifice the power. If we want Betemit's bat in the lineup, that should happen at 3b, and subbing for other infielders.
So the next time Kent (power hitter) gets a day off and Lucille II (banjo hitter) starts, don't the Dodgers need to get another power bat into the lineup in place of a banjo hitter to balance it out - like Kemp into CF?
Because Ned fluctuates between decent moves and thoroughly unfathomable moves. I'll give him credit for not trading the monster prospects, but I really believe that's other people like Ng and White in his ear.
When you give bad baseball players 44 million dollars, people are going to be concerned.
I have to give him credit on the Maddux trade. I liked it at the time and it worked out very well, but other than that his free agent signings and other trades have been mediocre at best and downright damaging at worst. He hasn't ended up giving much away, but we are saddled with bad contracts in the future (Pierre, Schmidt, Nomar possibly). It is only a matter of time before he gives away a valued prospect that turns into a star for an overhyped veteran.
My wife concurs with Oswald's assessment. Of course, she had a crush on Rickey Henderson growing up as an A's fan, so I'm not sure if we can put much weight behind her evaluation of baseball player attractiveness.
As for Ethier's on the field talents, I think he's worth keeping around. At current levels, he pencils out to a very productive, capable, flexible (able to play two if not three spots), and cheap outfielder. And since it's vogue these days to go with gut feelings (you can call me Chertoff) instead of that pesky data stuff, my instincts tell me that we haven't seen his best. Of our top tier prospects, I agree he seems to be the obvious and most painless choice to deal, but I think we would end up with some serious regrets if that actually came to fruition.
Betemit? Ethier? Guys who have proven it at the major-league level and are currently at log-jammed positions.
I don't see a Maddux out there available. You might get a chance at someone like Kyle Lohse, but he looks pretty similar to Brett Tomko.
I don't really see the point in trading for a fringe starter just to add a warm body to the stable. But do you want to let go of one or two of (Kemp, Loney, Billingsley, Kershaw, LaRoche) for someone like Javier Vazquez?
And again, despite what we may all think, Juan Pierre has pretty much done what could have been expected by management so in their minds, they got what they paid for thus far in the season.
Somehow I always get the feeling that to certain posters (and operators of premium baseball websites) that the Dodgers' success during the past year and a half has come in spite of both Ned and Grady. If Ned is listening to his stafff (and yes, Ng and White both work for him) then good for him.
In retrospect, that was a really great couple of trades. We got rid of Izturis, gained Maddux and his great 2nd half, made the playoffs, and got the 2 picks for Lugo.
Despite the fact that I believe Colletti might be a buffoon, he has not been a terrible GM, and I readily concede that. He's been okay. I will, however, always be nervous, because he signed one of the fundamentally dumbest contracts in Dodgers history. I can't ignore that. He's capable of doing it again.
I have to give Ned credit for making the playoffs last year. I thought during the 2nd half slump we had, we should build for the future rather than go for the playoffs, and I was wrong. However, that doesn't mean I have to like anything else he has done, although he should be given credit for not dealing the young talent at least. It could be a lot worse.
There are bad moves, and there are bad moves. Not all bad moves are equal. Some bad moves are bad. Others are baaaaaaaaaaaaaad.
As of right now, here are the large contracts we have for 2008 that will end after 2008:
Furcal - $13m (plus one $4m payment due in 2009)
Kent - $9m (if he doesn't retire)
Lowe - $10m
Nomar - $9.75m (includes signing bonus)
Wolf - maybe $9m (if he hits 180 IP)
All those are coming off the books after 2008. The only large deals beyond 2008 are Schmidt, Pierre, and Penny. I'd say the Dodgers are pretty flexible from a payroll standpoint.
Can you elaborate?
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.