Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Sorry I was such a downer last night. The fact is that Thursday was a great night at the ballpark. I only wish every Dodger opponent could play as poorly as the Astros did Thursday. In any event, just wanted to get things off to a fresh start today.
Tom Hoffarth of the Daily News points to this fan survey that the Dodgers have commissioned. Hoffarth believes that the question about what radio station you listen to the most may play into where the Dodgers continue broadcasting their games after their current contract with KFWB expires. Of course, the fact that I hardly listen to KSPN 710 AM, for example, doesn't mean that it is or isn't a good radio home for the Dodgers.
In any case, there are some questions you might want to voice your opinion on.
The survey ends with not even a thank you, but an awkward attempt to get you to establish or log into an MLB.com account. But who cares? The wind's at my back. The Dodgers have won two in a row, and the weekend is coming!
KSPN probably has more flexibility with their schedule since they will only have USC Football that will conflict with Dodger games, while KLAC will have Laker games in April and perhaps beyond (very pessimistic view of the Purple and Gold right now). They would also have UCLA football in the fall. But they also have other stations to farm out shows so that might be okay for those conflicts.
Both stations will not want to air exhibition games during the week, I guarantee that. KSPN did it for the entire Angels contract and I think their ratings took a hit, plus once the Dodgers move out to Arizona, it will be airing games during their local programming.
On the plus side, both stations would have more pre-game and post-game coverage.
At least I think it does.
I couldn't care less what station the Dodgers use for radio. Soon I'll only be listening to internet radio anyway.
I've never seen that concession on my level but then I didn't even know they sold root beer floats until this week.
Lakers
Clippers
Angels
Trojans
Bruins
and then (maybe)
Dodgers
Part of this is obviously because 570 is the Laker flagship station and 710 is the Angel/Trojan flagship, but it's annoying to have the Dodgers relegated to an afterthought. Admittedly, they're having a down year, but then again, look at the Lakers -- they've been slumming lately too.
It's in the high rent district part of the loge, not the ToyCannon District. ;-)
It's actually just a cart tacked on to a concession stand on the right field.
But I spend most of my time sitting in others people's high rent cushioned seats.
But really its a Lakers town and everyone else trails big time.
If you have Loge tickets and you enter from the Left field side you walk right by it, after you get your ticket scanned. It is not big, but it is a nice addition.
The cart that sells the veggie dogs, etc, is on the other side of the stadium from where ToyCannon sits, so it's likely he hasn't seen it.
They do have a health food concession stand that sells salads and such just about right behind home plate on the Loge level. Also a Philly Cheesesteak place around the same area.
I'm surprised I haven't seen it. I usually go early and spend my time wandering aimlessly from one end of the stadium to the other.
Scioscia denied that the decision had anything to do with having Lackey avoid facing Beckett.
"John would welcome the matchup with Beckett," Scioscia told the Angels' official Web site. "That's not the reason we're lining him up this way. He went to Boston (early Thursday). To have him ready to go, rather than waiting around, is better for him."
It's already 6-1 Red Sox, and the Sox have six hits, including 3 doubles, a triple, and a homer. The best laid plans ...
Clay Buchholz is making his first start.
I do not think the Lakers' fan base would stick with the team during a title drought of similar length. The Lakers' popularity is based on the impression of strength and resourcefulness the team earned during the Jerry West years, but has lost and will not regain for a very long time. I would be very curious to see what happens to Laker fan support once they lose Kobe. Also, while the Lakers do have a lot of loyal fans, I also run into a lot more haters. The Dodger don't inspire the kind of loathing the Lakers have lately inspired.
The Trojans are more like the Dodgers, with a more die-hard fan base, but during their wilderness years before Pete Carroll, their attendance suffered proportionally more than the Dodgers' has. And, don't forget, there is a significant minority of UCLA fans who root against USC every Saturday, as well as transplanted Cal and Stanford fans.
The Dodgers don't necessarily deserve all this loyalty, but it's a fact.
That's the place.
3. I'm Jewish but don't keep kosher--but I would absolutely LOVE a kosher hot dog stand and would buy them EVERY time. Going with the Louisiana Hot sausages now (which are pretty darn good), but I might switch it up if they had good kosher grilled dogs. I'm salivating just thinking about it.
Sure, fans attendance counts for something but I was really talking about what people call about on the local talk shows. I mean the Lakers lost to Phoenix in late April/early May and then all the Kobe stuff happens and they remain topic 1 throughout the summer.
And if they lose Kobe, there will be lots of calls about who the next superstar player of the Lakers should be.
Laker fans did leave in droves between the Magic and Shaq years.
I could be wrong but I remember this town in the late 60's, early 70's being a Ram town.
It is always about success.
Btw, Sgt, re: your question in last thread, I think Jon's right - I am pretty sure Lowe was pulled because of his recent hip problems. He pitched well but there was absolutely no sense in pushing their luck with that. Sometimes I think Grady is damned if he does (leave a pitcher in) and damned if he doesn't (leave a pitcher in). Anyway, I was just glad he pitched as well as he did. Maybe a CG next time.
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=6602
The kind of attention the Lakers are getting on the sports talk shows nowadays is the kind of attention the Dodgers don't need. The fact that Laker fans are going crazy over the possibility that the last link to their last run of titles might throw another hissy fit over a situation that he basically created is the sports equivalent of gossip-mania. Movie "fans" aren't the ones who are following Lindsay Lohan's exploits -- they're train-wreck fans. Ditto with Kobe. Bling, rape charges, apology diamonds for his wife, and endless complaints about Shaq, Phil, Mitch, Dr. Buss, endless fingerpointing -- yeah, it exerts some fascination, but it's not about sports.
My brother has interviewed a high school soccer coach in St. Louis.
His name is Charlie Martel.
Anyone wish to guess his nickname?
a couple more years we should have the complete 2004 Reds reassembled here in DC.
Worse number one picks of all time:
Chilcott(R Jackson went 2nd)
Bush
Danny Goodwin-Drafted Number one in 1971 but it was a terrible draft as none of the 1st 12 picks amounted to squat. Frank Tanana was the 13th pick.
Danny Goodwin - Again drafted Number in 1975 and again it was a terrible draft. The whole 1st round was nothing but cow dung.
Evidently scouting has gotten a lot better since the early 70's.
Sure glad the Padres didn't have an Upton in the plans that year. Not they would have chosen him since they couldn't even afford Steven Drew that year.
Left on the board in the 1st round so they could pick the easy to sign Bush:
Verlander
Weaver
Butler
Hughes
I think my brother will start a groundswell of support to get the guy called "The Hammer."
Your wrong on that. Jerry Buss is still driven not by money but by success. The Lakers have always had luck on their side when it came to the superstars that landed in their laps and it will probably happen again. I wouldn't be betting against 47 years of luck.
Nice, stick him in LF, give him 500 at bats and lets see what he can do.
We Nats fans are a happy bunch. We sign guys over slot and grab sensible gambles like Da Meat Hook and Willy Mo Pena.
http://www.livenation.com/event/getEvent/eventId/294853?c=dm-146193&p=32420926
But Brian Taylor had talent and was defending somebody in a bar fight.
For D4P.
http://tinyurl.com/28panz
Really, I should try one before I pass judgement.
A little spicy mustard and you're in the ballpark.
vr, Xei
>>Most teams have various forms of entertainment squirreled away around the clubhouse. The Dodgers, having what can only be described as, at least relative to the rest of baseball, ancient facilities, are no exception. Guys might watch TV or listen to music. They also have at their disposal one of those old school video game machines that includes the classic "Track and Field". Anyone who grew up as an arcade rat (or with a Nintendo) likely remembers it well. Russell Martin (specializes in the hammer throw) spends a lot of time on it, along with Billingsley and Broxton. I asked Martin who was the T&F king. "Lieberthal and Martinez are the best," he replied. Makes sense. Old school game, old school players. Lieberthal acknowledged his prowess. Nobody on the team runs faster, he said, moving the index and middle fingers of his right hand rapidly up and down (if you've played the game, you know why that matters). "Quick twitch." Still, in Track and Field as in baseball, it's hard to stay on top forever. The young 'uns, Lieberthal says, "are catching up because they play so much." <<
And half the Tigers have the flu as well.
I guess, but I always felt Jerry was overrated as a GM. He made one great move and that was to sign Shaq and trade Vlady for the right to draft Kobe. Everything else pales by comparison. If the Magic hadn't been stupid in their negotiations with Shaq none of that happens and then how smart is Jerry? He sure wasn't a genuis between Magic and Shaq.
It is not a religon but history:
1. Trade for Wilt and give up nothing
2. When Wilt is done, trade for Kareem and again give up nothing of note. Lots of bodies but not an all-star amoung them.
3. Trade an aging Gail Goodrich and somehow that trade turns into Magic Johnson by pure luck not by any design.
4. Magic screw up the negotiations with Shaq and we end up with the next great big man in basketball.
5. Able to get the Hornets to give up the rights to Kobe for a center we didn't need anymore.
http://tinyurl.com/3be3my
This year aside, I think Andrew Jones would have something to say about that.
"But astute trading had given Los Angeles the top pick in the draft. During the 1979-80 season the Lakers sent Don Ford and a 1980 first-round pick (which became Chad Kinch) to the Cleveland Cavaliers for Butch Lee and the Cavs' first-round pick in 1982."
Butch Lee's Laker career consisted of one famous moment, he was the player that Magic is hugging after the Lakers won the 1980 NBA title.
"With the Lakers, Goodrich guided the 1971-72 team to a 69-13 record and the NBA title as well as an NBA record 33 consecutive wins while playing with fellow Hall of Famers Jerry West and Wilt Chamberlain. His impact upon the Laker franchise extended far beyond his playing years, because late in his career, the Lakers traded Goodrich to the New Orleans Jazz for the Jazz' first pick in the 1979 NBA draft. When the Jazz had a poor record in the 1978-79 season, that pick ended up being the first overall pick in the draft; with it, the Lakers chose Earvin "Magic" Johnson."
"Questions will linger about whether they were overprotective of their impressive stash of top prospects at last month's trade deadline. The scuttlebutt around the game is that involved-owner Frank McCourt -- who's been conspicuously absent in a box often occupied by only a glum Tommy Lasorda and another less-known underling or two this week -- made all their many top prospects off-limits, or close to that. Word going around is there was a split within the hierarchy about how protective to be with their prospects, as well."
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/jon_heyman/08/17/scoop.friday/
James Worthy - another lucky move
Yes, I think Sharman gets a raw deal when people think West is a genius and they don't mention him.
vr, Xei
I could understand Grady wanting the kids moved for players he felt would help now. Managers don't care about the future because if they don't win now there is no future for a manager.
It would be interesting to find out how split upper management was. I wonder if Ned's lack of success with his veteran free agents might be a reason that Frank was able to saw no to dealing the prospects, if he indeed did so.
The DT day at Dodger Stadium might turn out to be an historic turning point. Whoever it was who made the impassioned case for having a homegrown, stable team to root for might've pushed McCourt over to the non-dark side.
I will kneel at that cathedral. Watching Magic play basketball to me would have been like watching Jackie Robinson play baseball. I've always felt lucky I was able to see him everyday in Los Angeles. You can mock him but I know what he meant to me.
http://tinyurl.com/2kfzla
The Thursday Heyman article at SI regarding the slot and the Tigers' disdain for it. (The article cited earlier is the Friday column by the same guy).
The Shaq-Kobe go-round, not so much. A negative vibe settled over the team then, and has only grown since then. At least for me.
But then, it blew up and we are where we are.
Me to, I'm barely a fan anymore. Hard to believe since I spent a good deal of my time playing with the Lakers from 1971-1976 in my backyard hoops. I'd been better if I'd had Magic dishing me the ball instead of Gail hogging it.
Jerry West is described as arguing for Sidney Moncrief as the top pick because he thought Moncrief was a superior defender and would work better with Norm Nixon. But Jack Kent Cooke overruled him.
Yes I remember. When we went to the last game of the 79 season, the PA guy said, "come back next year when Magic will be in the air" or something to that effect.
We hadn't drafted him yet but we knew he was going to ours. It made the wait until the draft easier.
I wish Jack Kent Cooke had owned the Rams instead of the Redskins.
The Magic/Moncrief debate did not last as long as the Wilkins/Worthy debate.
But then after that: Nobody told me there would be days like these...strange days indeed.
The anecdote I found disturbing (although typical) was Colletti's quote that the slump with RISP was "mathematically impossible". Um, no. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, but most of his public quotes indicate a bizarre understanding of math and statistics, at best.
Or even better 6i for 8 with RISP.
What other major factor do you consider when thinking about attending a Dodger game?
What I consider is the following: First of all, I hope to see a commitment to YOUNG exciting players. I do NOT like seeing OLD unproductive veterans. In fact one day I hope to see an ENTIRE TEAM of HOMEGROWN TALENT. I want a commitment to winning, but from a team on the field that's ready for a DECADE of dominance.
I also consider concessions...
---
FREE COOL-A-COOS!
hear hear. some of us loves the hot dogs, just not the meat. FYI, the only stand i know of where you can get the veggie dog is in the reserved level, section 3/5. got one last night. ask for it chicago style, because bob's basically right -- without the condiments, there ain't much to shout about.
and those cool-a-coos were great. made in pico rivera, too! for crying out loud, mccourt, bring back the cool-a-coos!
So you wouldn't want to sign Pujols?
The Sox could be forgiven if they weren't in a big hurry to hand Gagne a lead at the moment. He's been pretty bad since he got there, aside from a dominant outing on Tuesday. I might give the ball to Timlin if it were me.
105
Why would a team consisting of homegrown talent be committed to winning? Sounds like the cheap way to me. What if the homegrown talent was what the KC Royals were sporting these days?
Or the best relief pitcher on the team and it isn't Papelbon or Timlin or Gagne.
Actually no! by the time we'll get a chance to sign Pujols he'll be washed up and over the top.
but that aside, I was just exaggerating... I mean I said here on DT that if you get a chance to get A-Rod, go get him!
Which is another reason signing Pujols doesn't makes sense: we already will have A-rod by then (I hope)
Statistically, I'd pick A-Rod right now, but who knows?
I'd better explain the first sentence of that posting:
I don't mean that Pujols will be a "twilight veteran" after his current 7 yr contract is up... I just assumed that given our recent history, the Dodgers figured to sign him after the next term, when he'll be about 37 or 38.
Just trying to make the point that the choice isn't only between "young studs" and "washed-up veterans." I cringe when I think of where we'd have been without Lowe and Kent the last few years.
That's a very good point... I think when I wrote that, it was the pinnacle, or nadir if you will, of the Dodgers struggles so I was acting mostly on emotion.
Notice that the two you mentioned were DePodesta Hires?
Booooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!
;-)
don't mean to pile on here..
Of course, Coach said Magic. But I've always felt that the Magic phenomenon really took off in Los Angeles. People talk about the Magic-Bird college showdown as this watershed moment for college basketball, and perhaps rightly so, because there were a lot of people in this city, at least, that paid no attention to college basketball if the player wasn't wearing a UCLA uniform. We knew we had stolen something via the Goodrich deal, but I think very few people had any idea what they were really getting in Magic. I know I didn't, until I saw him hug Kareem after the game-winning shot to beat San Diego in the season opener.
And then, I fell in love. What a year that was to be a Laker fan. What a decade.
And yeah... viva la Cool-a-coos!
Big Bird is back in the pen right? Stults tonight for sure? If Hull was optioned, that is what was assumed.
BTW, why not throw Hull out there for at least a batter with a six run lead last night if he is heading out today? Save the arms in the pen for tonight. Maybe he would have kept Saito fresh by having better control than Roberto.
Jon, my dad believes to this day Magic was the best basketball player that ever played the game, and certainly the best he's ever seen.
Like you, he was very excited about him from the beginning. He told me once about the time they broadcast the draft and Magic's pick was decided on a coin flip. He heard all this on the radio. When Jordan was at his peak, my dad said that Magic was still better because he was good at making his team mates better as well.
I wasn't born until about the time Worthy was drafted, but I've always been a Laker fan through and through, and Magic is a big reason why.
Why can't we ever do something like this?
139 - which one do you want: getting Wily Mo or getting a player to be named later?
vr, Xei
So, remind me, what's a Cool-a-coo again? Some kind of sundae? I must have had one when i was a kid but don't remember.
The Michigan State/Indiana State March Madness game cemented the start of the Magic era in LA. That was all we talked about. It couldn't have been scripted any better for Magic to end up in LA and Byrd in Boston.
Looking back I begrudge the youth of most DT posters but to live through that decade I know I watched something special that the kids here will never experience. Magic's game six performance against Philly in his 1st year is still my most cherished sports memory. And Wilkes hit goofy shot after goofy shot. No one had a better nickname then Wilkes.
http://tinyurl.com/35eaxm
http://tinyurl.com/33u288
a team in the top echeleon in revenue earned is in the bottom half in money spent on amatuer talent is disgraceful.
After watching Pujols this year, I'm starting to wonder about what Ron Shandler (in analyzing his early-career stats) suggested long ago: Pujols might be older than he claims. Of course, if that were the case, I'm not so sure he'd have a few good years left at "32." MLB has allegedly cracked down on this, but then again, they've said they've done the same with performance enhancing drugs :)
On second thought, the latter "crackdown" might help Pujols deal more effectively with the former "breakdown" :)
You asked
I defended Ned in the past because it was usually a pile on, but with Bhsportsguy now doing the job on a daily basis I can be part of the pile on:)
I'm not happy with Ned but I wasn't happy with Depodesta either. Depo did some good things and I was on his bandwagon right up until he signed Gagne and Izzy to extensions at the height of their value and cut his own throat by giving Tracy a one year extension. I don't think he made a decision after that, that I agreed with. Given how hot he was for Navarro and how hard he tried to trade for Eric Duncan I'm not sure that he would have made the right decisions when it came to our kids and which ones to keep.
The difference is that I don't expect Ned to make the right decision and I'm sometimes pleasantly surprised when he does(Furcal) while I expected Depodesta to make the right decision and when he didn't I felt disappointment. After about the same tenure I think I was more disappointed in Depodestas moves then I've been in Ned's since I expected more from him. Still Depo should have been given at least 3 years and probably 4 to find out if he learned on the job or was in over his head.
I still think given time that Evans would have been a solid GM. He made plenty of mistakes but no more then his future replacements. After four years of his replacements I see no evidence that Dan Evans couldn't have done the same job.
They had to be high since the signed all 3 of their 1st round picks.
Since It's It ice cream sandwiches are from San Francisco, they should not be sold in Dodger Stadium.
Or in any place south of San Luis Obispo.
http://www.itsiticecream.com/
I think the only similar thing Ned has done in his two years is get Chin-Hui Tsao.
It is not like Pujols came over on a raft. He was playing local ball in Kansas City. How many guys after 9/11 are playing under the wrong age today?
And is there any reason to believe either statement is untrue?
---
The Giants spent the sixth-highest amount of any team on the draft. Perhaps Colletti himself was the one influencing them to write off the draft year after year?
Even Ned couldn't have believed in him all that much initially, since he started his career in Vegas.
I think that both of these statements can be true: MLB has indeed "cracked down" -- and both of these phenomena still take place.
On drugs, I find the Victor Conte interviews too compelling to think otherwise.
On age alteration, I actually played with a handful of Dominican teammates who told me once (on a long bus trip) all about how and how frequently it was done by desperate families who were understandably eager to improve their son's "prospectiness" (as Colbert might put it).
A fascinating road trip, to be sure.
---
Every time I see the name Porcello it makes me think we're talking about a type of mushroom.
I'm guessing the former group will be the ones dominating the league in a few years.
Teams that aren't scared of Selig
Teams that bend over for Selig
162 I'm guessing the Giants now are willing to spend money because the old build around Bonds strategy is starting to fall apart. I'm guessing Colletti has some effect on draft spending, but who knows how much. Still, spending 1/3 of Pierre's annnual salary on the draft is a disgrace.
And just out of curiosity, why does ½ and ¼ seem to work but the others don't?
Or in any place south of San Luis Obispo.*
Bob, this obsessive dislike of San Francisco may be the wedge that comes between us. It's It ice cream sandwiches are exactly what should be sold at Dodger Stadium. Don't stand between me and my favorite ice cream sandwich, Bob.
Furcal, SS
Pierre, CF
Sweeney, 1B
Kent, 2B
Gonzo, LF
Martin, C
Ethier, RF
Hillenbrand, 3B
Stults, P
Ummmm.....
Repko, CF
Lucille II, SS
Saenz, 3B
Lieberthal, C
Hillenbrand, 2B
Gonzo, LF
Sweeney, 1B
Penny, RF
Honeycutt, P
And seriously, Sweeney third?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293625,00.html
BTW, Kent does own Fogg:
13-27, 4 2B, 5 HR, 1 BB, .481, .483, 1.185, 1.668
Pierre v. Fogg:
13-27, 2 2B, 1 BB, .481, .500, .556, 1.056,
Furcal:
5-18, 1 2B, 1 3B, 2 HR, .278, .316, .778, 1.094
(must be one HBP also)
Everyone else has extremely small samples sizes (as if these weren't small enough.)
Mark Sweeney/Shea Hillenbrand on the corners just screams "SF Giants".
Not even bhsportsguy can defend this.
Yes he has stunk over the last two months. Stunk to the tune of .307/.360/.458.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PHI/PHI200706010.shtml
He's 10-49 in August, 2-15 this homestand. That's a bit of a slump, but Sweeney?
Given that Grady is forced by necessity to start Hillenbrand (or Lucille II), there is no reason to get creative to start Sweeney also.
Why, because they had a two first round picks, including the 7th pick, and the first pick in the supplemental round.
This year, they had one pick in each round and it was in the latter third of the draft, thereby short of taking a shot at talent they may have fallen due to certain issues like signability, its no surprise that they would have paid bonuses toward the bottom of the teams for this draft.
Now, let's say they draft a player in the 5th round that was a 5th round player, they are still going to be in the bottom half of the amount of spent because every pick they signed was signed at slot level.
John Manuel said in today's chat, that he belives that Blair turned down 1.1 million because he wanted 1.35 million (same amount Withrow signed for). Again, if that is the case, I'm not sure what everyone wants White to do, its his call, if they are already going over slot (by about a million), I don't think McCourt is telling him don't spend the other 250K, its White holding firm on what he believes the player is worth. Again that is what he gets paid to do.
BTW - last year, Kyle Orr signed for $435,000 as a 4th Round pick, which was 165K more than was recommended for that slot.
You should the mustache he's sporting these days.
Has no one told him?
Well, Stults is a lefty; maybe there won't be many right-side grounder into what I presume to be the maw between the rosebush and the professional pinch-hitter.
Which part of the Gold Line tracks? The Heritage Square stop has a nice backdrop.
The Lake Avenue stop is not so nice.
If this were truly the case, I wouldn't have as much of a problem with it. But nobody has made a remotely convincing case that it's actually White making the decision. And don't cite his quotes as proof that it's his call, because he wants to keep his job, which means he would be giving those quotes whether it was him or Colletti or McCourt making the decision.
White is a guy who has always tended to be very passionate about the guys he drafts. I have to believe that if he didn't think Blair was worth 1.3 million, then he wouldn't have wasted a fifth round pick on him knowing that those were his demands. Same with Hochevar -- I have to think that he badly wanted to sign Hochevar but was not allowed to by the bosses.
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... etc etc. And it appears for all the world like the Dodger ownership is reluctant to incur Selig's wrath by giving above-slot bonuses. Kyle Orr is an exception, yes, but a very mild one.
See 191 . 4 AB, 1 single, 1 K - what's to miss?
If you had told me in March this would be our Aug. 17 lineup, I would've thought we were 20 games out.
And a meteor had flattened Las Vegas.
I have hesitated putting this in because it is still unclear what these quotes mean but take it for what it is worth.
Tim Hallgren, the director of amateur scouting, explains, "It came down to (Chris) Withrow and Blair. We liked them both and debated. We knew we could sign Blair for first-round money but we thought that Withrow had a tick more upside so we went with him.
"There was no point in taking Blair in the supplemental round because we knew he wouldn't sign for slot money there. As the draft went on we thought that maybe some team that spends a lot of money like the Red Sox might take him but they didn't. The fifth round was the final round the first day of the draft, if you remember, so when it got there, we decided to take him and see what happens."
I live right near the Lake Ave stop and it is crazy loud down there. I definitely prefer the Memorial Park if I don't mind the walk.
Furcal
Ethier
Loney
Kent
Kemp
Martin
LaRoche
Pierre
Grady is probably thinking, that Stults will get lackadasical with the offensive support he'll get. Put in your 'C+' line-up and Eric will have to be sharp tonite. It's a psychological thing, or just plain psycho?
Two games in a row! We're going to the World Series!
You know Steve Phillips actually believes in that theory.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/LAN/LAN197805300.shtml
Serenity now!
NPUT
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.