Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
The team's top two position players and top starting pitcher in September are 23 or younger. And so, of course, MLB.com gives us the following headline:
"Dodgers rely on vets in stretch run"
And, of course, Roberto Hernandez (eight outs recorded this month) gets mentioned in the second paragraph, which asks the question, "So what will prevent this team from fading into obscurity as the season winds down?"
And, of course, Luis Gonzalez is there in the fourth paragraph to make like Clarissa and explain it all:
"Playing long enough, you can see when the rope is slipping away. Guys start pressing and trying to do too much," said Gonzalez, who was eliminated from the playoffs last season in September as a member of the D-backs. "That's where you hope that experience that guys have takes over, because those guys have been there before and learned from it. That's what carries a team down the stretch."
And, of course, though the contributions of less experienced players are mentioned, Hernandez is able to put it all in perspective:
"This is where veteran guys like Nomar, Jeff Kent and Gonzalez step up and lead by example," said veteran reliever Hernandez, who has been to the playoffs four times in his career. "The good thing about the young guys is that they're hungry. Those kids are excited and this is their first time experiencing this. You can feel the energy."
Indeed, as the article goes on to concede, "The youngsters have provided a boost as well."
Is it not safe to say that the Dodgers wouldn't even have a stretch run to contemplate if not, first and foremost, for the September efforts of first- and second-year players Kemp, Loney, Billingsley and Takashi Saito?
There's actually a story here. It's not that some of the veterans aren't helping, but it's that the kids are clearly leading the way. But why report actual news when you can pass along a cliche?
Has Roberto Hernandez actually recorded eight outs? That seems a high estimate indeed.
This article, when considered with Plashke's Grady piece, smells funny to me. The timing with the Dodger Talk brouhaha is also.. hmm.
Or maybe I'm just a cynical bastard.
104. Bob Timmermann 2007-09-17 14:33:34
I think Richard Dawson could get a boost if he marries a younger woman.
http://tinyurl.com/2hd9e7
His current wife is 22 years his junior, a relatively young 53. Does he have to go even younger?
I hate this spin, but it's par for the course. We can blame the reporters but this is the attitude of dodger management. Both in words and in actions..
I think he needs to go for a Tony Randall-type situation.
If Loney wasn't an untested rookie who was "pressing and trying to do too much", he'd have been 20-24, with 4 HRs and 15 RBIs. If those were Kent's or Nomar's numbers, the article would (rightfully) be about how he was "carrying a team down the stretch."
(Loved Kent's veteran leadership in getting thrown out on the basepaths while down two runs with two outs and the base in front of him occupied.)
My grandfather was thirty years older than my grandmother. I wonder if I inherited any good old-goat genes? (Probably just the bad ones - the "hey you punk kids, get offa my lawn" variety.)
Eric Gagne?
I'm sure if the Dodgers had a larger budget, they would have been more willing to give him 5-6 mils.
If the Dodgers cant afford A-Rod---the veteran riff raff accumulated will take alot of the blame, and rightfully so.
The marketing of the vets is not arbitrary. It is deliberate and intended to sell seats to the casual fan.
Kemp has been on the active roster for 96 of the Dodgers' 149 games this year. The average Dodger player this year has had 4.31 plate appearances per game, so we'll use this figure to hypothesize that playing full time since his recall, Kemp would have accumulated 413 plate appearances by now. Had he been on the team all year and playing full time, he'd have 642 plate appearances. In reality, he has 265.
In his 265 plate appearances, Kemp has accumulated 47 Runs Created, for 0.177 RC per plate appearance. At that rate, he would have accumulated 67 more RC if he'd been playing all year, or 26 more RC if the Dodgers had simply played him once he got called up.
How does that compare to the guys who were playing instead? For purposes of this exercise, we'll assume that two-thirds of Kemp's playing time would come at the expense of Juan Pierre, and the other one-third at the expense of Luis Gonzalez. This means the Dodgers would have lost 17 Runs Created posted by Gonzalez and 28 by Pierre. So by playing Kemp, the Dodgers would lose 45 runs and gain 67 for a net gain of 22 runs.
So we know the answer: The Dodgers would have scored about 22 more runs this year if they had decided to play Matt Kemp full-time. At a very conservative estimate, they also would have given up about 5 fewer runs due to the difference between Kemp and Gonzo/Pierre defensively. So all in all, the decision not to play Kemp this year probably cost the Dodgers 27 runs. This assumes that Kemp's performance level would have stayed the same with more playing time, which is admittedly an unknowable assumption.
So, 27 runs. How much has that cost the Dodgers in games won and lost? The Bisonian Dodgers hypothetically would have scored 700 runs and allowed 636. This comes out to a Pythagorean record of 81-68. So far this year the Dodgers' actual record of 79-70 coincides exactly with their Pythagorean record. So in the final analysis, it's fair to conclude that a Dodger team with Kemp playing full-time would have won only two more games over the course of the season.
Will two fewer wins mean the difference between making the playoffs and not making it? I guess we'll see.
Maybe if I have time tonight I'll do a similar calculation for Loney.
BTW, Melissa Joan Hart turned 31 earlier this year.
I disagree, because Russell Martin is our most popular player. There is a reason why he was the starting All-Star catcher.
The team just does not market the other youngsters as well.
I assume you took into account his injury at the beginning of the season and subsequent DL and recovery time?
And his baserunning errors! (I'm kidding. We probably lost a couple of games in the standings on veteran baserunning errors, and another few on the noodle arm of the centerfielder.)
"Proven Veteran Leaders will carry the day. Young players are unworthy to carry their jock straps!"
Kemp has been on the active roster for 96 of the Dodgers' 149 games this year. The average Dodger player this year has had 4.31 plate appearances per game, so we'll use this figure to hypothesize that playing full time since his recall, Kemp would have accumulated 413 plate appearances by now. Had he been on the team all year and playing full time, he'd have 642 plate appearances. In reality, he has 265.
In his 265 plate appearances, Kemp has accumulated 47 Runs Created, for 0.177 RC per plate appearance. At that rate, he would have accumulated 67 more RC if he'd been playing all year, or 26 more RC if the Dodgers had simply played him once he got called up.
How does that compare to the guys who were playing instead? For purposes of this exercise, we'll assume that two-thirds of Kemp's playing time would come at the expense of Juan Pierre, and the other one-third at the expense of Luis Gonzalez. This means the Dodgers would have lost 17 Runs Created posted by Gonzalez and 28 by Pierre. So by playing Kemp, the Dodgers would lose 45 runs and gain 67 for a net gain of 22 runs.
So we know the answer: The Dodgers would have scored about 22 more runs this year if they had decided to play Matt Kemp full-time. At a very conservative estimate, they also would have given up about 5 fewer runs due to the difference between Kemp and Gonzo/Pierre defensively. So all in all, the decision not to play Kemp this year probably cost the Dodgers 27 runs. This assumes that Kemp's performance level would have stayed the same with more playing time, which is admittedly an unknowable assumption.
So, 27 runs. How much has that cost the Dodgers in games won and lost? The Bisonian Dodgers hypothetically would have scored 700 runs and allowed 636. This comes out to a Pythagorean record of 81-68. So far this year the Dodgers' actual record of 79-70 coincides exactly with their Pythagorean record. So in the final analysis, it's fair to conclude that a Dodger team with Kemp playing full-time would have won only two more games over the course of the season.
Will two fewer wins mean the difference between making the playoffs and not making it? I guess we'll see.
Maybe if I have time tonight I'll do a similar calculation for Loney.
Since you had time to run the numbers on Kemp twice, why didn't you just do Loney the second time...?
Melissa Joan Hart = awesome.
and totally waved at me the one time I got to go to Nick Studios and we saw her getting hair/makeup done.
That is all. Carry on.
The cover of last season's Dodgers postseason media guide was a painting of six of the "kids" overlooking the Stadium field -- Ethier, Kemp, Broxton, Billingsley, Martin and Loney.
It was an interesting choice at the time. It seemed like a message from the Dodgers front office saying, "We may not be ready to do damage in the playoffs now, but wait until next year when our kids arrive."
The Dodgers had the correct answer for 2007 last October. But they (namely, Ned) got nervous, played it "safe" and unnecessarily blocked most of those kids with veterans.
I used to look at that painting and smile. Now it just makes me sad, because the Dodgers have no one to blame but themselves if (when?) they miss out on the playoffs this year.
I think winning is what gets the casual fan or the fairweather fan or people who just go for the scene.
But I believe from reading the comments that the Dodgers haven't played their younger players enough.
I was unsure of that until today.
Go buy yourself a smoothie. It looks like you could use one.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7235996
Unfortunately, franchise management failed to trust the development capacity of its own minor-league system.... Lining up for most of the credit are general manager Ned Colletti and dugout skipper Grady Little, two guys who still walk 12 miles to old school.
While this article discusses decisions regarding Loney and Billingsley, it is noticeably absent of the word "Kemp". Eric Enders, among others here, could make/have made this same point in more convincing fashion.
Youngsters could have saved Dodgers
http://tinyurl.com/yskkqv
But I won't get one sponsored by Nike.
And why can't I be grouchy? Everybody else gets to be grouchy? Why do I have to be pleasant all the time? It wears on you. I want to wake up some morning spitting nails.
I still haven't worn the jacket.
The second-easiest to find jersey was Nomar and after that it was Lowe. There was no Martin or Ethier or Penny to be found and certainly no Kemp, Loney, or Billingsley.
I saw Dodgers name-and-number T-shirts featuring Loney 7 and Kemp 27 at the Top Of The Park store for the first time last week.
Back on Opening Day, I noticed they had T-shirts for Billingsley.
They read "BILLINGSLY 58"
I'll be buying a Kemp shirt when I attend my last game.
Just get a Jamba Juice smoothie with a free Bad Mood Boost.
Has Pierre had one? I wonder if they're to scale...
That's exactly what popped into my head when reading Jons opening to the thread.
Um, of the season, or have you got an unnamed illness?
As to the original article quoted in the post, conventional wisdom is not solely the province of political pundits.
Of course, in fairness, there were Kemp and Loney bobbleheads given away this year. Problem is they were given away in Jacksonville.
The guy has turned into a one-man baserunning blunder machine. I don't remember that being a problem of his in previous years, except for the infamous play against the Mets.
Meanwhile, the D-Backs have played well above what the numbers would suggest (that, as they say, is why they play the game). The Padres have continued to play just above average baseball and dominate within the division (incredibly important with the unbalanced schedule).
While I know it ain't over until it's over... I'm looking ahead to next year and I think we can figure the Padres will be good again next year and the Rockies and D-Backs are going to continue to improve. That means that the Dodgers are going to have to improve a great deal.
Two projected wins aren't going to be enough.
Third base is going to have to be addressed. Center field should be addressed. And someone has to have a sit down with Kent to discuss just exactly what his future is going to be.
As far as marketing goes, I think the Dodgers were once pretty good at marketing their kids. They did it in the 90s, they probably did it in the 70s. Of course, these Dodgers aren't at all like those Dodgers when it comes to the front office. When it comes to the old guys, I'm guessing Nomar is the only one that casual fans would know of the vets because he's got a certain celebrity value (from the A-Rod/Jeter/Nomar triumvirate days)
Who has the most influence over what fans think of the Dodgers? It's not a newspaper writer, not a blogger, not a front-office person. It's Vin Scully, by about 1,000 miles.
Scully is even-handed, perhaps a little too fair at times, but entirely credible and honest. He is old but he is not old school in the sense that Joe Morgan or Rex Hudler are active proponents of an old-school set of beliefs. He goes game by game. He will tell you when someone's hot and when someone's not, and doesn't seem to ever play favorites.
The Dodger marketing people might believe the fans worship Nomar and Kent (the commercials produced in the pre-season but still on the air obviously show that), but Vin Scully has cued the fans to support players I think most of the commenters here also support: Martin, Loney, Billingsley (as long as he keeps his pitch count low!), Broxton, Saito, Ethier, Penny.
Okay, he doesn't hate Pierre, but that's explainable by the fact that Pierre is exciting, if he gets on base, and all broadcasters are drawn to drama. But Scully has been critical of Pierre's arm and pointed on on many occasions that opposing teams go from first to third on him and LuGo.
When Gonzalez, Nomar, Kent and for that matter Saenz and Hendrickson do good things, he shares in the excitement. But he never shies away from criticizing them, and he never questions their absence from a particular game.
I can easily imagine another broadcaster taking a different tack. But Scully lets performance speak for itself, and then uses his broadcasting magic to transform talented performers into stars. So now, in part thanks to Scully just doing his job, the crowds cheer Martin, Loney and Billingsley at least equally as loud as they do Nomar and much more than the other veterans.
If Colletti and Little are looking for reasons not to play the kids and to let the PVL's take the reigns now that the games are crucial, they are doing so in the face of public opinion opposing them. I truly believe the fans know a lot more than we give them credit for about Loney, Kemp, Martin, etc., and want to see them because they are great players for today, not just the future.
Shorter version: If Colletti and McCourt think playing the veterans is better PR/marketing, they are demonstrably wrong and way out of touch with the messages fans are getting from the broadcasts. This is perhaps why Josh is so shocked at the tone of Dodger Talk. The callers are probably a good representation of the current beliefs of fans.
You mean you agree that I'm in a bad mood?
The TV ads and souvenier jerseys are lagging indicators because the production cycle is slow. I am confident a big ship full of Loney jerseys is chugging its way to San Pedro as we speak, just in time to fill the stores and the online sales for Christmas.
Man, I hate off days.
If you want to wake up spitting nails, spend your evening getting hammered.
Well, I was making some sense. Unlike my attack on LAT last night.
That is the rate of cumulative growth of ticket sales since the end of the 2003 season.
And as much as some thought it was a silly idea, the All-You-Can Eat pavillion has to be one of the great marketing campaigns in the last few years.
Looks like I'm staying home then!
If you do stay home, don't buy any of that focaccia mix for Christmas. It's not worth the risk.
His job isn't to let anonymous posters insult his employer, tell the manager who to play and the GM who to keep. If fans want to express a point of a view and be respectful, its one thing, if they want to end every post with FIRE GRADY or FIRE NED, then he has every right to speak on behalf of the team.
In my very limited dealings with him and having met him on DT day, I have found him to be very nice and accomodating and certainly understands the fans and their point of view.
But to say that he would be involved with some type of shennagins without any evidence is just wrong and I think it is very unfair.
Still, in the big picture I think it's likely much better to have a team with depth than worry about these intangible issues.
The Dodgers are barely hanging on to slim playoff hopes.
UCLA just got spanked by an 0-2 team from the Mountain West.
The Clippers will not have Elton Brand for a good part of the season, at least.
The Padres were patient with Kouzmanoff because they didn't have any other options. And they tried using guys like Blum at third and then acquiring Ensberg before he finally got hot.
I think the Red Sox were patient with Pedroia in part because they had a big lead. And Julio Lugo was worse, so Pedroia looked like Frankie Frisch in comparison.
The Dodgers have put up with slumps from Loney and Martin this year. And a lot of that is because the alternatives aren't great.
Yuck!
Park was very upset because he said the suit that was ruined was a gift from his mother.
Granted, he could afford another one, but I can understand his anger. It wasn't like the Dodgers were showing a lot of sensitivity.
Is it really that big of a deal to have to wear a disco suit?
I don't even think Park got in a fight, he just sulked.
In a span of perhaps 20 minutes Wednesday afternoon, Chan Ho Park went from pitching savior to hitting hero to clubhouse goat.
Park (5-2) pitched three hitless innings in relief for the victory. And he drew a bases-loaded walk with two outs in the 13th inning to account for the game-winning run. But in the aftermath of the celebration, it all went awry, leaving his teammates fuming.
Park was sitting in front of his locker, talking about his heroics to reporters, when he suddenly noticed his suit. It was ruined, the pants legs and jacket sleeves cut off. And hanging in its place was a funky disco outfit.
It's a traditional stunt that the Dodgers, as well as most other teams, pull on every rookie. They did it to Hideo Nomo last year. They did it to Mike Piazza. They did it to Eric Karros.
Park lost it. He threw his plate of mushrooms into the air. He demanded to know who had ruined his clothes. He slammed a chair against his locker.
He screamed obscenities, then sat in front of his locker, seething. He put on his sunglasses, tossed the disco outfit into the trash and sat staring straight ahead.
Suddenly, it was no longer funny to the rest of the Dodgers. They became upset because he wasn't playing along. Piazza talked to him, telling him he had to wear the outfit, that it was tradition. Manager Tom Lasorda talked to him.
But Park left for the team charter flight wearing the uniform pants he had worn during the game, along with his warmup jacket and sunglasses.
On a day the Dodgers should have been celebrating, having won for the eighth time in the last 11 games and with a 1 1/2-game lead in the National League West, the incident ruined the mood.
"We talk about camaraderie, then you see this," Piazza said.
"It's sad. It's like tradition is gone. I don't care if you understand or don't understand, you got to do it. Everybody does it. I did it. I remember walking through the terminal {in the disco outfit} and having everybody laughing at me. What's the big deal?
"I don't have that many years in the league to talk, but you know as a rookie to keep your mouth shut and respect the veterans on the team. You do what you're supposed to do. You don't do something like this."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kMkBcoxTxo
(safe for work, if sound is headphoned)
Third base has been an adventure but if Nomar is healthy enough, he plays and while he may not want to sit out, he certainly knows that his situation is based on his health.
Also while he did not fall into a severe slump, after Loney's very hot start, for two months he hit .270 with a .700 OPS, unfortunately he like the rest of team has a horrible August.
Los Angeles Dodgers rookie Chan Ho Park said Thursday that the suit his teammates shredded the day before in Chicago had great sentimental value, and that is why he became enraged at the practical joke.
Park has since been apologetic, and said he intends to tell his teammates as much.
Parksaid he did not immediately understand such a baseball ritual.
To review, Park pitched three scoreless innings Wednesday against the Chicago Cubs, and was the winning pitcher in a 13-inning, 4-3 victory. He also drove in the eventual game-winning run with a bases-loaded walk. Afterward, Park found that his suit -- apparently his favorite suit, at that -- had had its shirt sleeves and pants legs snipped.
He threw a plate of food, spouted profanity and threw his chair against a row of lockers. When he settled down and stopped throwing things, Park was inconsolable. He even wept, while all around him his teammates expressed disgust at his reaction.
The flight home from Chicago didn't get much better for Park, who insisted that airlines officials retrieve his luggage from beneath the plane so that he could change into another suit. While Park changed from his baseball pants and jacket into a new suit, one teammate commandeered the plane's public address system to announce that changing on the airplane was not allowed. Park ignored the humor.
By Thursday afternoon, Park was considerably more contrite. He said that he had misunderstood the playful intentions of the prank.
"Now I understand the situation," Park said. "And I'm happy they like me.
"I didn't know. So I was mad."
The fact is, Park's teammates still aren't too sure about him. Many suspected he was somewhat aloof all along and has been coddled by the organization, and this confirmed it for them. It also was said that Park refused to participate in previous initiation rites and therefore brought extreme measures upon himself.
I can't get over how funny that is.
I'm glad I'm not a professional baseball player. I wouldn't fit in.
Not coincidentally, the Chan Ho Park incident occurred right around the last time people were talking about lousy chemistry in the Dodger clubhouse.
"It was a good Spring. There were a few things I was working on that are coming together. Now, I'm just excited to get to LA and have some Korean food."
Which almost certainly involved red meat.
Baseball players are jerks.
Except for Choi.
Why I hate frats and all that junk.
I was told by my parents that they would not pay for me to go to college if I joined a frat.
I was allowed to join Phi Beta Kappa.
Agreed.
You know what man you can kind of see Parks side of this, he probably sincerely didn't know the traditions of baseball & if that's the case I can definitely see his side of the story.
I know nothing about the Greek system. What is Phi Beta Kappa like?
I am guessing it has smarter people than your average frat.
Re the Park situation, I think the two sides were talking past each other all along. Park's teammates were upset that he didn't dress in the silly clothes, while Park was upset that they ruined his nice suit with sentimental value attached. It seems to me that Park would have gladly participated in the ritual had they not shredded his clothing. Cutting up a man's suit, especially when it's likely his only one, is a little extreme.
So sad: Bob doesn't even know what you're talking about.
My disdain for all things Greek led me to throw even the Phi Beta Kappa mail in the garbage unopened
I didn't join because I thought it was a scam to be rewarded for academic achievement by being allowed to pay someone else money. They should be paying me money.
Stuck with: Kent, Pierre, Schmidt, Nomar, Loaiza
You've got to go to Oregon, Molly. I think you'd like it.
BAKLAVA! BAKLAVA!
Park's reaction would probably be considered subdued compared to mine. But then again, I've never been one who was known to play well with others.
As a side question, did the Marlins have this kind of stuff going on when they were all young and winning the World Series?
http://manolomen.com/2007/09/14/kilt-tough/
Sure he is only 6-6, but since the day that Clemens started against Pittsburgh, the Yankees, if they win tonight will be 60-31. If the Boston score holds up, the would have gained 7 games on Red Sox and 8 games on the Tigers during this period, to be 3.5 games out of first place of the division and to lead the Wild Card by 2.5 games.
Obviously, there's a very fine line between mild hazing and abuse. I remember an outcry when some NFL rookies were taped to goalposts and left to bake in the sun for hours during training camp. And I also remember a while ago there were some high school football players who were basically assaulting some of the younger players. When hazing is taken too far, then yes, it demonstrates nothing more than power over a lesser person.
But dressing up in an embarrassing outfit is harmless, especially when it's a gag that everyone (including the rookies) is in on and can have fun with. At SoSG there's a picture of the Cincinnati rookies dressed up in Hooters girls' outfits, and they all look like they're getting a big kick out of it. We're not talking about Code Reds here. Gentle hazing like that builds character in the players and camaraderie among teammates.
And no, I was never in a fraternity.
I like my garments bifurcated.
(Ducks)
He has not produced to the level of what he is getting paid, but the Yankees will definitely need him in the playoffs.
At my school, fraternities were (and for all I know still are) rigidly segregated and populated almost entirely by spoiled, racist rich kids who were mostly there to snort their inheritance up their noses, or drink it down. They weren't the kind of people I felt comfortable sharing the same earth with, much less the same living quarters. And besides, what's the point of paying people to be your friends?
That describes the UCSB frats pretty well. Only one of my friends bothered to join a frat at SDSU and his frat was pretty much the exact same way too.
http://tinyurl.com/2p7xza
Pretty good. They added three high quality guard recruits to go with Neitzel. They are probably the best team UCLA will face in the regular season.
I am guessing that is why you are asking.
All Dodger non-pitchers have hit .281/.344/.413 this season. I broke it down into completely arbitrary categories:
Age 25 & younger: .295/.365/.470 (2064 PA; 38% of total)
Age 26-34: .271/.320/.343 (2127 PA; 39%)
Age 35 & older: .275/.352/.438 (1266 PA; 23 %)
All Dodger pitchers have a collective 3.99 ERA & 1.32 WHIP
Age 25 & younger: 16-11, 3.50 ERA / 1.28 WHIP (244.1 IP; 18.3% of total)
Age 26-34: 52-52, 4.24 ERA / 1.36 WHIP (905 IP; 67.7%)
Age 35 & older: 11-7, 3.45 ERA / 1.15 WHIP (188 IP; 14.1%)
Obviously.
This fall is going to be interesting from a roster management point of view. Ned and Co have not shown themselves to be very good at this aspect of baseball management.
This postseason is a critical one because a fairly large number of decent to very good prospects will be needed to be protected or be exposed to the draft.
To alleviate some of this problem Ned could offer Wolf a minor league contract with an NRI to ST. The minor league contract would stipulate that he could become a FA if he was not added to the 25 man roster by May 30th. If he was added to the 25 man after ST he would make a base salary of $5M plus $250K for every start after the 15th (16-32) thus allowing him to collect $9M for a healthy productive year.
Actually, I'm thinking of going out to Michigan to visit my brother in the winter and I was wondering if it would be worth the expense to go on StubHub looking for tickets to see Michigan State play.
He doesn't live too far from there.
Well that helps reinforce my thought that we should re-sign Wolf if we can get him for pretty cheap.
I did something similar earlier today. I looked at the correlation between age and BA, OBP, and SLG for the 2007 Dodgers. I found negative correlations for each, with the OBP and SLG being significant at a 0.10 level of significance.
In other words, on average, as your age goes up, everything else goes down. (Yes, I'm still talking baseball stats).
Chance for the first big league win for Jonathan Albaladejo?
I am not allowed to comment on the Cardinals.
I can say Ryan Howard is from St. Louis and the fans there really cheer for him when he comes to visit.
The same situation applies to Tsao and Brazoban.
If they all showed they were injury free and effective our pitching staff would have an abundance of quality choices.
BTW - Houlton and Kuo are out of options and would have to be on the 25 man or be lost.
Are you violating Rule 12...?
That wasn't it. Hopper for the Reds is a HR away from the cycle.
You mean "Southwest Missouri State star Bill Mueller?"
You need to learn proper St. Louis Post-Dispatch style.
Although Howard went to the same school, he's usually referred to as "Lafayette High's Ryan Howard."
That would be an orange alert.
Jeff Keppinger and Norris Hopper are easy to distinguish on the field. One is an infielder and the other guy was over at the Art Institute of Chicago trying to get people to believe he painted "Night Hawks."
In the first inning.
Go Braves!
And now the Cardinals have cut the lead to 12-5 and loaded the bases with none out for Pujols in the seventh.
I'm still fascinated that NY's best offer exists only before the opt-out, with Texas' $21.3 million in the package. If they offer a four-year extension, the Yankees' offer can be $3 million/year less than anyone else's and still have equal total package dollars.
But Ryan Howard is due up next inning, so the Phillies will add at least one more run. Howard is almost Loneyan in his production!
Why spend all that money when you can just write "Betemit" in the lineup at a fraction of the cost?
C - Martin
1B - Loney
2B - Kent
3B - A-Rod
SS - Furcal
LF - Ethier
CF - Pierre
RF - Kemp
has produced a collective hitting line of .298/.365/.469 in 2006.
But the Yankees can preemptively offer Boras/ARod what they think they can get on the open market AND effectively throw in Texas' $21.3 as gravy on the deal, if they negotiate it as an extension. No one else can do that.
I think the Red Sox will sign Lowell for short term and look for a young third baseman for the future.
"Branyan with a chance to haunt his old team."
Branyan played seven games for the Phillies.
C - Martin
1B - Loney
2B - Abreu
3B - LaRoche
SS - Hu
LF - Young
CF - Ethier
RF - Kemp
I could see the Pirates being a half decent team in four years if they hire a good GM.
Then they were good for a few years.
He could very well be the worst starter the Padres face all year.
Real cool wannabe Eric Byrnes.
Ron Santo may have to take tomorrow off.
Can SF hold on to beat the snakes. I hope so, as wierd as it feels rooting for SF.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.