Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Assuming the Yankees' rapprochement with Alex Rodriguez eliminates his Dodger future, the Dodgers are at a crossroads.
They can pursue a trade for Florida All-Star third baseman Miguel Cabrera, probably costing them at least a starting pitcher and two starting position players. The Dodgers could then sign free agents to make up the difference.
Potentially, you would be replacing Andy LaRoche, Matt Kemp and Clayton Kershaw with Cabrera, Torii Hunter and Kyle Lohse. The latter group would cost tens of millions more than the former, but let's say hypothetically that money is no object.
Kemp (.295 EQA at age 22-23 last season) is better than Hunter (.277 EQA at age 31-32 last season, career high of .282), even factoring in Hunter's defense. Kershaw should be better than Lohse (ERA+ of 100 at age 28 last season, career-high of 106) within a year. Does the difference between Cabrera and LaRoche make up for that?
Baseball America executive editor Jim Callis, for one, felt LaRoche was a better option than Rodriguez.
"I think the Dodgers would be much better off just going with LaRoche rather than playing an older guy or shelling out $30 million-plus a year for Alex Rodriguez," Callis told me in an e-mail. "He got off to slow start last year while overcoming soreness in his non-throwing shoulder, but he raked after that. He's not just a one-dimensional masher, as he can hit for power and average and play a solid third base. He should be healthy as he gets further away from his 2006 shoulder surgery. I really like him."
Cabrera won't earn $30 million a year with the Dodgers, and I am certainly intrigued by him. With EQAs of .319 or better each of the past three years, the Dodgers haven't seen a hitter like him in their lineup since Shawn Green (at his peak) and Gary Sheffield. And LaRoche's shoulder concerns me less than his back, which gave him trouble late last season.
If you make the trade and sign the free agents, you improve the team for 2008. And after 20 years with one playoff victory, maybe that's all that matters. You don't worry about the fact that the package you give up could be better in 2009 than what you have now. If Hunter goes into firm decline and Kershaw goes into Pedro Martinez mode, you just deal with it. If Cabrera leaves as a free agent in two years, you just deal with it.
You'd still have Russell Martin, James Loney, Jonathan Broxton, Chad Billinglsey, Andre Ethier, Chin-Lung Hu, James McDonald ...
So why am I still torn?
A Juan Pierre-Hunter-Ethier outfield leaves me cold.
Matt Kemp is as exciting a ballplayer I've seen in a Dodger uniform in a decade.
And I think I'd rather see Kershaw stumble as a Dodger than see him become the next Pedro as a Marlin.
So honestly, I don't know what to do. But here's what I think might happen. Florida will ask for a fourth player not Pierre - in addition to Kemp, LaRoche and Kershaw. Or, the Marlins will ask for Chad Billingsley, whose major league career path puts him ahead of Hall of Famer Don Sutton. And at that point, I would have no trouble balking at the deal.
The Dodgers have enough resources that it's entirely possible to fill the holes made in a large trade for Cabrera. For example: Kemp, Kershaw, LaRoche for Cabrera. Cabrera fills LaRoche's spot, Hunter, Rowand or Jones replaces Kemp and then you sign Sabathia, Santana or Sheets the following offseason to replace Kershaw.
It's not nearly as cost effective, and the centerfielder trifecta probably isn't quite as good as Kemp, but you aren't stranded with Delwyn or Stulton getting any useful amount of time.
------------------
Because of this, I disagree with the idea that Lohse will have to replace Kershaw. I can't see him breaking into the rotation anytime before mid August, and even then we'd have to have some severe injuries for that to happen. You need to look ahead to 2009 to determine his replacement, which for now looks a lot more promising.
The only way that I would call any trade for Miguel Cabrera a bad idea is if we included both Kemp and Billingsley. Everything else, at worst falls into "time will tell".
Kershaw is a little tougher to draw a line in the sand around. TINSTAAPP, and all that.
Not sure what to make of that.
I guess that would make Russ and Bills the only two that we could probably pencil into the lineup next year. I still think that we should see what we could get for Furcal, though I really can't see Colletti assuming that Hu could walk in and do the job.
I hope you're right though. Billingsley ought to be next to Martin at the top of the Untouchables list.
Derek Jeter's Career Splits:
317/.388/.463
Derek Jeter's Career Postseason splits:
.314/.384/.479
"Mr. Clutch is actually Mr. Exactly the Same No Matter What Month You Are Talking About. He is Mr. Equally Excellent Hitting SS Every Month from April to November. He is Mr. Outrageously Similar Statistics Every 30 Days."
I know the guys at FJM don't beleive in Clutch, and I'm not sure I do either, at least in baseball. But to say that Jeter's slugging performance is the same in regular vs. postseason is just wrong.
He's slugged 16 points higher in the post season. Not a tremendous difference, but significant.
At least significant enought for Ken not to try and prove a point with the slugging numbers he compared.
4 is more hot steam from the hot stove, but you can bet that if Rowand somehow ends up here he'll do no better than he did this year. Talk about hot and cold! There's potential for a big regression here.
It's amazing that so many problems were created by just one player who now does not exist at DT.
Maybe this is too emotional a way of looking at the whole thing, but at this point, having watched the Dodgers' prospects come to the league, I really want the chance to watch them develop together. I just want it. I want to see if Matt Kemp is a star to be or if he is just another trash-can mover. I want to see if James Loney can chase .400 some year.
Looking at how baseball works these days, and the economics of building around young players, and watching the Nationals be unable to trade Soriano or a scorching-hot Dmitri Young or Chad Cordero for top-tier prospects because other teams value those young players so highly, I also think it is smart to maximize what you are getting from your own farm and then to backfill with FA signings.
But it really has become emotional for me. The Dodgers are blessed to have such a big core of young players coming to the league at the same time. They have the top pitching prospect in all of baseball! Wow. What fun.
Let's play two!
7 Of course, but I don't think we really notice that he's gone until 2010. I think we get into the pitcher bidding war of the 2008 offseason regardless of who we have. I also think that we go to McDonald before we go to Kershaw. Until Penny and Schmidt leave, I don't think he's guaranteed a spot in the rotation (and I have to believe Penny won't be allowed to leave the team, especially if we get cut out of the Sabathia/Santana/Sheets sweepstakes).
By then, we have guys like Elbert and Orenduff who aren't amazing now, but who knows by then. Greg Miller and Edwin Jackson were just as good as Kershaw at this point, and things happened. I really believe that so long as you play your cards correctly, we can afford to lose Kershaw.
with a few minor fixes, maybe get rid of pierre somehow, and add Jones, add a relief pitcher and a starter
Torre is good for few wins over Grady.
Loney and Kemp playing a full season.
we will be ok..
why get rid of these guys after we kept them for so long to get to this point?
I'd still be perfectly content to add LaRoche as starting 3B, replacing Juan Pierre with Young (or even Andruw Jones), make a couple small signings, and largely sticking with the team we have. I wouldn't be against trading for Cabrera necessarily, but I'm content not to.
i know its a stretch because of injuries and the fact that its always a stretch with young pitchers but...i think we look good for the next 10 years with the guys we got.
There are a lot of little things that can effect guys at the plate, or in the field - and can happen at any time, like Sax and Knoblach forgetting how to throw the ball from second to first. I've also seen guys who get a hickup in their swing.
Nonetheless, it's an interesting psychological point.
vr, Xei
I've stated here and on true blue that I think we'd be better off doing nothing then signing bloated free agents and making the kind of trades that Ned has made the last two years. Other then CF I don't see a week spot on the team. Now if Juan Pierre was going to become a reserve then I don't see a problem with
Loney,Kent,Furcal,Laroche,Martin,Kemp,Pierre,Ethier for 2008. I don't have the same expectations that many here have for them but I think a team that has six players with an OPS of plus 800 will score enough runs to win quite a few games with a pitching staff of Billingsley, Penny, Lowe, Schmidt, Loaiza, McDonald, Elbert, Kuo, and Kershaw.
If they are okay with making Juan a reserve or eating his contract and sending him somewhere else, I also would be open to A Jones or even Tory Hunter playing CF for us. Sure they would be overpaid and they could both kill us at the end of the contracts but no one can deny the upgrade to the team of Jones or Hunter in CF as long as it means Juan Pierre is not playing.
Of course all that was said before the bright penny of Miggy Cabrera came on the market. I'm more then willing to jettison some of the youth for Miggy. His type of hitting skills don't come around very often. As Regarfield said, even if we overpay, the worse that could happen is that Miggy is on the team. I've already stated what I would trade for him and that I would only trade for him if an extension is signed. Otherwise with Arod off the market I feel the team as it currently stands is good enough right now to compete for the NL championship for the next 5 years. After 2009, depending on how Ned allocates extensions for the kids the budget will only be $40,000,000 and with that brings in a ton of flexibility.
What do we currently have:
1st - Loney - he can't be as good as he was in Sept. He can be as good as Mark Grace and that is a very good baseball player.
2nd - Kent - still can hit, I think he will falter in 2008 due to health, but with Abreu and Hu ready to step in, at least the defense will see a huge upgrade. I'd like to see Richie Weeks playing 2nd base for us in the future. If the cost is Broxton I could live with it.
SS - Furcal - in 2006 he was the MVP of the team and a top 10 MVP player in the league. He'll bounce back, he's in a walk year, expect a solid year. Going forward, Hu in 2009 will mimic his skills minus the base running.
3rd - LaRoche - I feel LaRoche if healthy will become the best hitter of the kids and should give us Todd Zeile/Tim Wallach like production with solid defense in his early years and rival Ron Cey in his peak years. He would hit better then Lowell right now in Dodger Stadium.
C - Russel Martin - Perennial all-star catcher, as he battles Brain McCann for the starting job over the next 5 years.
LF - Andre Etheir - One of the best defensive right fielders, should become the best defensive LF in the NL. He's not perfect but a 800-830 OPS will do just fine. Sure we can upgrade here and the minors have no options so it would be either a trade or free agency. Not seeing any LF that I'd buy right now, I could take a chance on Bay if the Pirates wanted to swap left fielders. Bay's upside, if 2007 was due more to his knee surgery and less to a skill decline or PED issue is enough to take the chance.
RF - Matt Kemp-best home grown outfielder since Raul Mondesi and to my eyes Mondesi is the perfect comp. Great speed, great power, strong as an ox, great arm, terrible routes, and terrible plate discipline. If Matt Kemp learns some plate discipline he could be the best hitter since Sheffield, it not Mondesi is not a bad floor.
CF - Big hole, no future prospects. The Dodgers can win with JP playing CF but it makes it that much harder.
Starting Pitching:
Chad Billingsley - huge growth in 2007. He's as valuable as Matt Cain and we will have him for a long time.
Brad Penny - If he ever could put together two halves he'd be able to via for a Cy Young. Probably never going to happen but at least you know in the 1st half you'll have one of the best pitchers in the league and if he can just be league average in the 2nd half, you still have a valuable pitcher. Under contract for 2008 and 2009
D Lowe - still earning his money, but he'll be gone next year.
Schmidt - other then being expensive I cannot hazard a guess as to what he'll do for us.
Loiaza - if healthy he'll be a decent 5th starter though a bit expensive. Gone after 2008 and a contract that can be eaten if he blows.
Kuo - other then being cheap I cannot hazard a guess as to what he'll do for us. As far as skills go I'm still very high on him. As far as health goes I doubt I'll ever see the skills give us 100 innings.
DJ Houlton - not the worse option if we need a 5th starter
McDonald - 2007 was such a surprise he needs to show that he can stay healthy and that he's really this good.
Kershaw - Jim Callis thinks he should be in the rotation by July. If so, why trade for a pitcher when you might have the best one in baseball over the next 5 years waiting in the wings. Can he be our CC Sabathia? At age 20, CC did a solid job.
Elbert - once the top pitching prospect, he's now behind Kershaw and McDonald. On most teams he'd still be the top pitching prospect.
I don't know, seems to me the future is very very bright. Cory Hart should be playing on this team in CF.
Just imagine if Schmidt comes back and Kershaw develops as expected. Jason Schmidt would be the number 5 starter. Can any rotation in the NL come close to rivaling that?
I'd still sign Jon Leiber because I've always been a fan and I have no problem with having to much pitching. If Loaiza has to pitch out of the bullpen so be it.
I think it is important to think what this FA class could have been were it not for teams resigning their talent. Imagine how different the landscape would have been if these players had not been given extensions:
Oswalt
Vernon Wells
Ichiro
Kent
Zambrano
Aramis Ramirez
I am sure that there are more, but those are the ones that stand out. My point is that players are coming on the market in their prime less and less. I think that this trend will continue over the next couple of years. Every year there will be one or two real difference makers, but I think that we will see fewer above average guys make it to the market.
If the Dodgers want to make themselves better now and in the future, we can not count on what the market will make available and bear in the future.
If Colletti really wants to make a spalsh, he should deal Juan Pierre for anything he can get. That would be a prime example of addition by subtraction. Do it, Ned!
To illustrate: 4 years ago, we were all just as high on Greg Miller as we are now on Kershaw. Last we saw of Greg, he had been demoted back down to AA, and his future as a big-leaguer looks very dim.
There seems to be a lot of dislike for Rowand. What is that based on?
If they sign anyone I hope it means Pierre will be the most expensive 4th OFer in history
I think I'm going to be sick.
We didn't get A-Rod. I'm disappointed, but if he wants to be a Yankee that much, what can you do. I'd have offered 10/300 over the 10/280 he got, but maybe that wouldn't have gotten it done.
So now do nothing and put the money, next year, into Santana, who is worth it. No Rowands, no Hunters, no Jonses. Do not give up the future for Cabrera, great as he is, when you can sign him in two years.
No A-Rod? OK. ARONS still applies.
We're going to pay for his mistake one more year.
vr, Xei
Fred (Austin, TX): Am I overvaluing Dodger prospects? It seems that any combination of three- Billingsley, Kemp, Kershaw, LaRoche or Loney is too high a price for a guy you can keep for two years. Maybe one of those guys (NOT Loney) plus Ethier, and eat much of Pierre's contract and maybe even a mid-level prospect (such as McDonald)
Keith Law: (2:04 PM ET ) I agree. If I'm Colletti, Kemp, Loney, Kershaw, and Billingsley are untouchable. I'd deal LaRoche, but I wouldn't be in a rush, and I'd like to give him one shot at the job first. Ethier I'd deal. Broxton & Meloan I'd deal. Elbert if/when he's healthy, Abreu, even Hu. But not the big four.
I am not down on Rowand per se, but he is, in my opinion, not a good fit for the Dodgers. Andruw Jones would be better because of the power that he brings to the table. I am still unsure about signing a CF without shipping Pierre, but if we were going to sign one, Jones would be a better fit.
I'll take Miggy but if we're going to give up high ceiling pitching, I'd rather get Santana.
Does anyone else feel like they have yet to hear a rumor with a shred of credibility that actually makes them feel good about '08?
Examples might be "Dodgers to pursue Santana/Cabrera and actually are NOT opposed to requiring an extension negotiation window" or "Dodgers to consider platoon and pinch runner-hitter role for Pierre if free agent outfielder is signed". I'd personally like to hear "Dodgers close to deal with A-Rod, plan on dealing Furcal for prospects to help replenish those lost on inevitable trade for Johan Santana and GM Colletti to retire, claiming he is 'going out on the top of my game'; Pierre to be released." Maybe that's too long of a headline.
vr, Xei
For those who wonder why I among many are excited about the future, lets look back at the history of Dodger drafts prior to 2002 (Logan White's first season).
First Round Picks (1988-2001)
1988 - Bill Bene RHP
1989 - Jamie McAndrew RHP
1990 - Ron Walden P
1991 - No First Round Pick
1992 - Ryan Luzinski C
1993 - Darren Dreifort RHP
1994 - Paul Konerko C
1995 - David Yocum P
1996 - Damian Rolls 3B
1997 - Glenn Davis 1B
1998 - Bubba Crosby OF
1999 - Jason Repko OF
2000 - Ben Diggens P
2001 - No First Round Pick
Sure Konerko turned out to be a very good player (for the White Sox), Dreifort never quite lived up to being the 2nd player picked (behind A-Rod) but mostly dreck, not even servicable dreck for those years before Logan White.
I used 1988 is starting point because that was the last year when the Dodgers drafted two players that became All-Star caliber or good MLB players who played for many years for the Dodgers.
Piazza - 62nd Round Draft Pick (1988)
Karros - 6th Round Draft Pick (1988)
Hollandsworth - 3rd Round Pick (1991)
Jose Offerman - Amateur Free Agent (1986)
Raul Mondesi - Amateur Free Agent (1988)
Chan Ho Park - Amateur Free Agent (1994)
THe Dodgers drafted and signed Piazza, Karros in 1988. Todd Hollandsworth was drafted in the 3rd round (their fist pick) in 1991.
It is possible that more impact talent was drafted and signed in 2002 and 2003 since the late 1960's when Garvey, Cey, et. al., were first signed with the Dodgers.
That is why the Miggy deal is so disquieting to me, I can see the logic behind it, but I hope the Angels pull the trigger.
As Jon has stated before, Ned needs to win this year more then worry about covering his butt. If he wins, his past mistakes will be buried under the hubris of celebration. I don't see how getting Rowand/Hunter/Jones and putting JP in LF will make that happen unless he follows that up with trading a package that includes Kemp or Etheir for Miggy/Santana/Bedard.
Which is why most of us don't think Ned Colletti is very good at his job.
Don Mattingly (hitting coach) and Larry Bowa (third base coach) are following Torre from New York to Los Angeles. But Ron Guidry, expected to be replaced as Yankees pitching coach, isn't coming along.
"I talked to Gator and I told him that I really wanted to stay closer to the Dodger organization since they had a lot of young pitchers. I thought it was the best thing to do," Torre said. "He's just going to stay home."
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3111423
(note -- I have not read this, and the bloggers are somewhat notorious for the fact that one of them has some professional connection to MASN which they don't disclose on their blog and yet they write glowing panegyrics to all things MASN).
http://tinyurl.com/28o7hv
True
How many times have DT posters started out a sentence "if the worse he does is...."
Sucks not having any confidence in your GM.
I don't understand the quote. I read the article and the quote still makes no sense to me.
Not his batting
Not his batting
His arm.
We talkin' arms, man
That's a fundamental misunderstanding of the problem.
True...
I wonder what Billy Beane would do with $120 million. He is so good in the $60-70 million, I wonder what he could do with the Dodger payroll.
It's hard to find a good CF. Depending on your point of view, there might be one on the market this year -- Jones -- and because of his recent stinky play, he might be available at somewhat of a discount.
So sign him and move Pierre to left, where it will be immediately clear that he can't cut it. It's much easier to replace a left fielder.
Of course, the Dodgers could just bench Pierre right now, and that's where that argument fails.
Again, it's limiting the damage. We always seem to be doing that with this GM.
55 I don't quite get that quote... Does he mean he will work as pitching coach?
It seems to me that we could find a taker for Pierre the same way we found a taker for Shawn Green. We got NOTHING for him and ate his salary, but we also did the whole addition by subtraction thing...
Sure, I'm one of the few optimists around here, but I think it's possible. Colletti has demonstrated he's open to changing directions when he realizes he is wrong.
Critics of the "Pierre-to-LF" comments need to recognize that the start of the season is a long ways away.
I could be for Jones, on a overpay-for-short-years Furcalesque contract, if and only if it means Pierre is traded or rides the bench, and I expect neither of those things will happen, so I'm not for Jones, either.
Thanks, it was the "I" that confused me.
i'm pretty sure the move to left for JP is a defensive move and has nothing to do with offense.
there is less room to cover, so his bad jumps arent as glaring, and shorter throws so his weak arm isnt hurting us as much.
but the offensive reason people are stating is balogna....if you move kemp to center and JP to left you still have the same offensive prouction from those 2 positions....
sign jones, ship pierre for a reliever. leave laroche at 3rd. we good man
I am also open to such a possibility. It is important that I build my hopes high enough so that when they are dashed I have a good reason to drink.
That is certainly ideal from our cheap seats. Maybe we could flip someone for a bit more pitching depth, but a straight Jones-JP swap would do it for me. Let's just offer to eat about $25 million, fill in some holes on our AA and AAA rosters and call it a day.
Even if the Dodgers offered to pay 50% of his salary, I don't see anyone taking him.
That kind of move would seem to be beyond the scope of Ned, and McCourt must not have appreciated just how slick that deal was since he jettisoned the man responsible for getting him out from under such a terrible contract. If only Arizona still had the same management that not only took Shawn Green but extended him.
Anyway, I totally agree with Jon's post here, and with Jim Callis, so I can't add anything, really. Just keep LaRoche, forget the Marlins' ridiculous trade demands. If you want to add more outfield depth, fine, but only if it relegates you-know-who to the bench, and I'd rather they focus on finding one more good pitcher and be done with it. I know Colletti feels a lot of pressure for this season, both from his expiring contract and from the wind coming from Jeff Kent's... motorcycle, but he's got so much young talent to work with already.
Or, as was said in Star Wars, "Stay on target... almost there... stay on target..."
(Of course, I think that guy got blown up, but don't tell Ned that part.)
Why does it seem that everyone else's guys that "play the game the right way" are way cheaper (Eckstein) or more productive (Wright, Helton, Lowell) than the guys that Ned gets (Nomar and our CF)
Why does it seem that everyone else's guys that "play the game the right way" are way cheaper (Eckstein) or more productive (Wright, Helton, Lowell) than the guys that Ned gets (Nomar and our CF)
I have days when my hopes and dreams go unfulfilled.
I call them weekdays.
https://fairpole.baseballtoaster.com/archives/548606.html
http://tinyurl.com/2ho8br
So the Mets went after Posada hard and ending up giving him a great bargaining trip, then ended up with two backup catchers for millions of dollars. That is how to play the field agent market.
Considering that there was the option of "replace J.D. with Kemp" or "anyone but Juan Pierre", I don't see how DePo even had an indirect effect on those signings.
The photographer would have to have left town for the $100 bill shot.
And perhaps gone to Egypt to find an unfinished pyramid with a freaky eye above it for the $1.
The suggestion was made with tongue in cheek.
I used to be a big fan and then he opened his mouth one to many times.
If you don't believe it, that's fine. I am not going to try to convince you otherwise, just like the playoff crapshoot. I will take the word of the people who study these things.
vr, Xei
For comparison purposes, did the study say how positional prospects fared?
Anyway, I'd prefer the Dodgers just re-sign Lieberthal, or let another kid backup Martin.
I'd rather keep what we have than trade away. Still, there are some free agents. Pierre is the problem, and fielding is not exactly coming up in the ranks. There's alot to like about Jones, but as I stated earlier, my perception is that there is more risk there than I'd be willing to gamble on.
I'm not high on Rowand, he may even be the flip side of Pierre in that he's much better defensively but not that good at all offensively. Still he's had some good years and streaks. And because of the way this funky team is constructed (Pitching, Kent, Pierre) I think defensive CF is worth alot-- Something I have my doubts that Kemp can handle (or Pierre or Ethier for that matter).
While Rowand is not the best he doesn't fare horribly in defensive metrics. See ducksnorts nice write up:
http://tinyurl.com/3bmosy
Kid Piazza!
Shoot, I may not play the defense of Paul Bako, but I think that I could Hit within 30 to 40 points of him...
To me, he seems like a poor man's Andruw Jones -- all the same liabilities (namely, he might not hit) and benefits (better defender than Pierre)... but not as much. Why do you advocate Rowand over Jones?
I do think we should make a strong play J.R. House or trade for a decent minor league catcher in case Russ does go down.
Per Olney:
Beyond the offense and defense Rowand provides, the Dodgers hope he will also help change the culture of the team.
he also is regarded as one of the great character players in baseball.
What kinds of characters does he play?
He played the "have a huge contract year" character pretty well...
5 bux says he plays the "do nothing after that" character pretty well too...
To me, the proper comparison is Rowand versus other candidates -- Repko? Kemp or Ethier in CF? Do we have an adequate alternative?
That's dark, even for someone with Dark in their name.
130 I know, sounds like he played Kaspar Gutman in a local production of "The Maltese Falcon."
as much as you all hate on pierre, you cannot deny he is a run producer...low OB% or not the guy makes things happen when he is on base.
if rowand is a character guy, does that make pierre a physical comedian?
And sabermetric people that aren't stuck in 2001 value defense very highly.
Rowand at 5/$60M is just on par with "I thought about it, and even though it's over, I'm going to tell my wife about the affair."
Bad Idea Jeans. The only jeans endorsed by Ned Colletti.
If Aaron Rowand is such a great character, what's he doing playing baseball when he could be dealing with much bigger problems in the world?
Baseball is entertainment. Few entertainers are also great "character people," and some of them are outright scumbags. But if they can act or sing well, or tell a good joke, we're all there, money in our hands. And entertainers work in close quarters just as much if not more than athletes on a team like the Dodgers. Lots of movies are made successfully despite "bad chemistry" on the set.
Let's make sure our next president, the next CEO of Citicorp, and the head of the Norris Cancer Center are great "character people." Don't waste all that great character people on something as frivolous as baseball.
If finding great character people is the business Ned wants to be in, he should be working for an executive recruiting firm or a political party.
Every season.
Both appear to be able to play the position as Rowand has 3 Gold Gloves and Hunter has 7.
They are about the same age, Rowand is 29 Hunter is 31.
Rowand has a career OPS+ of 106 while Hunter's is 104. Rowand's has more variance. Over the past 4 years (listing 2004 first) his OPS+ has been 130; 93; 86; and 123 while Hunters has been 104; 106; 112; and 122.
Looking at the past 4 years as a whole there does not seem to be a lot of difference. I won't comment on the character thing as I never been too good a judge of that.
As far as the defense goes... as I think I've argued quite a bit, the key to winning is to score more than the other team. Good defense and pitching means the other team scores less, meaning it's easier to win games because you don't have to score as much.
Pierre/Rowand/Kemp or Ethier is overpaid mediocrity.
Does Colletti really want me to go on a murdering spree?
now take his 60ish SB's
putting himself in scoring position makes up for other players who walk more and stay on first.
he has had OBP in the 370's twice, and over 350 4 times, for a non-walk guy thats not bad.
he has had 5 or less errors every year but his second.
outfield assists
2006- pierre 5 jones-4 rowand- 6
2007- pierre 4 jones-3
in '07 rowand had 11 but 5-6 is the norm with years with less and 8 once.
and any guy who is scoring 96 runs on that team last year is a run producer.
and no defense is STILL not as important as scoring runs, and OBP is important for some players, but not as much for spead guys... OBP is HUGE for slow sluggers
But yeah, I'm not happy about either though.
I keep hearing people using terms like "run-producer." When I was a young-un, a player like Pierre was thought of as very valuable. Every team had one--a guy who hits .270-.300 with no power but could flat out fly on the basepaths. This was back in the day when stolen bases were considered very important.
We are older now and wiser and we've learned to ask the "why" questions. I never, ever thought to challenge the label "run-producer." People in the game talked like that and I wanted to talk like that, too.
What's my point? I don't think Ned is far enough removed from the baseballspeak. I think he still buys the run-producer, chemistry, character stuff.
It scares me to think what the Dodgers will give up to get Cabrera.
vr, Xei
Kemp, LaRoche, Kershaw and Hu? Not a chance. Three hotshot prospects is more than enough.
I'm sorry, I don't understand your post.
35 guys is a lot of guys, especially when Pierre's use as a hitter is supposed to be getting on base and scoring.
And why, exactly, would we control for HR? Do runs scored by HR count less than runs scored other ways?
Murderous ramapage - over reacting - you think
Raw totals don't mean much. If I make ten free throws, and you make 9, it doesn't make me better than you if I got thirty extra chances.
Percentages matter. Raw totals...Not so much.
But what am I gonna do? Im stuck with this one for the long haul.
what im sayin is, on a low-power team like we have, you cannot sit on first base and wait for homers.
when pierre is on base his speed and SB's turn our weak mid-lineup hitters singles, and doubles into runs where others cannot.
that is evident in the fact that he can score nearly 100 runs on a weak hitting team.
Again, raw totals are a very poor indicator of things.
vr, Xei
The SB's are nice, but his success rate is nothing to write home about, so he doesn't help the team as much as the amount of SB's would suggest (though he does help).
If he OBP's .370, there'd be a lot less complaining. A good OBP is a good OBP, regardless of whether the player is a "walk guy" or not. More walks means the OBP is less tied to batting average. So a guy in a slump can still get on base.
Errors are a bad way to measure defense.
Outfield assists are a horrible way to measure defense. Are you suggesting Pierre has a good arm?
Scoring 96 runs while playing all 162 games is not that impressive. Runs scored is a function of the people hitting behind a player, the amount of games played, and is not a good metric overall for measuring offensive production.
A run saved on defense is just as good as a run scored on offense. Granted, there are probably less opportunities to save runs than to score runs.
OBP is weighted slightly too less for speed guys and weighted slightly too much for slow guys. But it's important nonetheless. Slappy doesn't get on-base and doesn't hit for power. His defense is okay probably, but not elite. His speed is useful but he's not a super base stealer. Slappy just sucks.
and no defense is STILL not as important as scoring runs
I disagree, our team is built on pitching and as a team, we need to compliment our best asset with players that can help it thrive. Pierre does not do that, even Coletti sees it now. If another team can't score because of our pitching and defense, it can't win. Look at the Padres over the past couple of seasons, how many 1-0 ball games have they won?
his low walk rate is the main factor in his low OBP, but does the fact that he also doesnt strike out (meaning he puts the ball in play) which is something that is stressed by coaches since little league) tells me that he has an excellent eye at seeing pitches.
DTers are a very trusting group.
He doesn't walk because nobody walks banjo hitters. You want him to swing. And strikeouts don't matter. I can link to a study or two on the subject, if you'd like to read it. Pretty interesting stuff.
What I'm saying is, Slappy does not help us being a low-power team. It seems like you're thinking about him being separate from the rest of the Dodgers, but he contributes more than any other Dodger for our low-power offense. Replacing him with someone with SOME power and SOME ability to get on-base would do wonders for us.
Pierre is only an inch taller than I am, and he hit as many homers last year as I did in my entire little league career. I'll take him on my team!
That said, if the Dodgers could dump him, I'd be all for that too. But I won't boob and whine that he's on the team, if only because he's so scrappy.
BTW: He isn't.
and even with his weak arm and low OBP he still creates more runs with his legs than he gives up with his arm.
and i would love for us to get jones...but im afraid colleti will do so at the expense of kemp or Ethier
read the last of this post 74
...oy, Juan Pierre has less than a third of the power that F.P. Santangelo had.
vr, Xei
And someone needs to update the "juanpierreoutwatch.blogspot.com/" website.
we could get a better "return" by keeping them
haha.
vr, Xei
In the first 12 seasons of the Lasorda Era (1977-1988), the Dodgers averaged 87.5 wins per season, made the playoffs six times, reached the World Series four times, winning two championships.
I use this example not to prove that Lasorda is the missing ingredient, because he isn't, but to point out the difference between the Dodger teams of the 1970s/1980s and the Dodgers of the late 1990s/2000s, which was a homegrown core. The early Lasorda teams where built around players who had come up through the Dodger system, like Garvey, Cey, Lopes, Russell, Yeager, Scoscia, Sax, Valenzuela, Welch, Guerrero, Hershisher, Howe, etc., with the occasional valuable piece added via trade/free agency, such as Dusty Baker, Reggie Smith, Jerry Reuss, or Kirk Gibson. Unlike the Dodger teams of the past decade, which have lacked a homegrown core, those earlier teams always a chance to be a championship contender because they had a solid foundation of homegrown players. Those extra three wins per season may seem statistically insignificant, but they are the difference between a "good" team and a "very good to great" team.
As many here have pointed out, the current Dodgers have a chance to once again build around a solid homegrown core of Martin, Loney, Kemp, LaRoche, Billingsley and Broxton, which others such as Kershaw on the way. For the Dodgers to trade away pieces of this new core--even for a Cabrera--guarantees that the team will continue to remain locked in the "good" 84.64 win slot, with little chance to move up to the "very good to great" 87.5 win slot.
The logic here is circular. The Dodgers are a "low power team" in part because they have a centerfielder who never hits home runs. CF might not have the same power expectations as the corner positions, but "zero" falls short of even those reduced expectations.
And moving him to LF is the cherry on the fake whipped cream of a powerless Dodger offense. I think Bob T found that the last LF to hit zero home runs was back in the dead ball era.
We've been frogs sitting in this slowly boiling water for awhile, getting used to one of the most monumentally stupid ideas a team with pretensions of being a contender has ever come up with, putting a slap hitter in LF just because his speed is desired, but his defensive qualifications for CF fall short.
Not even perennial last place teams put players like Pierre in LF.
To nate's point in 181 , I can't believe even Colletti would stake his job on Pierre outperforming Kemp. And if he doesn't think his job and professional reputation are at stake, he's kidding himself. Kemp in a deal for Miggy is at least justifiable, under the right circumstances. But Kemp going because he's expendable? As much as I think McCourt is a boob, I think that's the last trade he'd let Colletti make.
Just think of the stakes, and maybe this is slightly reassuring. Kemp is traded for a Carlos Silva type pitcher. The pitcher is .500 or a little better. Kemp has 30+ home runs, high average, high OBP and gets into the World Series. Pierre is Pierre. The Dodgers finish third. That scenario ends Colletti's career.
Does Ned really want to risk all of that, just because he doesn't want to admit he made a mistake on Pierre? Hey, Ned, a "character guy" admits mistakes and corrects them.
your point is somewhat overshadowed by our homegrown teams in the 90's, 5 straight ROY.
also by the "bought" AL teams beating the NL to a pulp most years.
Maybe it is that there is so much pent-up-explaining of the stupidity of the Pierre signing and of the absurdity of buzzwords that people can't maintain their grip and just spew.
Nah, I'm too easy. I don't want Rowand but if there is someplan to jettison the dead horse, then it's another step from the edge of insanity.
It actually doesn't gurarantee that at all, because there are way too many other factors at play, but I'm sympathetic to your point of view.
Maybe Scott and Juan could have a support group.
Anyway, BR says that JP created 84 runs this year in 729 PA's. Torri Hunter created 95 runs in 650 PA's. If Hunter had the same number of PA's as JP that projects to 106.5 runs created or 22.5 more than JP.
How much money should you spend to create 22 runs? How many wins would this be? This ignores defense of course.
("That" can mean whatever you want it to mean, except for "this.")
i already touched on that.... 78
if we kept our current outfield, or even if we signed jones, and pierre stayed in the lineup, the move to left is not offense related.
While everybody else mocked it.
http://tinyurl.com/yssu3v
It's going to be a fun Model U.N. this year!
I am guessing -- though I have no real evidence for this -- that the doctor will induce tomorrow.
The anticipation is killing me.
Podsednik had as much to do with winning that championship as I did.
I like to think he gave Sabean an "In your face!" gesture.
That's the spirit!
Let's talk about, well, anything else.
and his SB's had nothing to do with it either i suppose?
67 players have hit less then 5 home runs and walked at least 75 times.
http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/T5WK
It isn't easy but I would say it is a myth that powerless hitters can't work a count. Regfairfield used Butler as an example but there are plenty more where he came from.
And I wouldn't be saying "ha ha ha" to anybody if I were arguing your position. If we go down that road, it will not end well for you.
I will again repeat for the thousandth time that Colletti has never waivered on his opinion on what Juan Pierre's strengths and weaknesses are as a ballplayer. He may have used words that I might not have chosen to describe them but I don't think there was ever any "talking up" Juan Pierre.
He has also explained why he signed him due to the lack of experience on the club in the outfield.
Now if these potential moves represent a change of thought on Juan Pierre, we shall see but I hope folks periodically remember Jon's piece on Hot Stove rumours.
i was laughing at the irony of a powerless hitter saving their season with a home-run...and yes there season would have been lost....i believe that was a walk-off in an elimination game...not positive though
and was that an online threat?
If we go down that road, it will not end well for you.
sounds like some heavy star-wars stuff
Pierre, who played in every game, who played in roughly 1,416 of a possible 1,450 innings (97.7%), scored a total of 96 runs.
Scoring 96 runs does not make JP a "run producer".
This is the part where we agree to disagree.
With 729 plate appearances, 275 total bases (164 singles, 24 doubles, 8 triples, 33 walks, 6 HBP) plus 64 stolen bases, minus 15 caught stealing, minus 10 GIDP, is simply feeble. Almost any MLB outfielder - and certainly Ethier and Kemp - given those opportunities, would have crushed those numbers.
Let's move on.
(Gotta use a few Bill Jacks quotes from JFC...Ned to us on the Pierre move to LF):
Listen to me. Listen to me! LISTEN TO ME!! Do not confuse my admitting a mistake, like a gentleman, with a check made out to you to subsequently go berserk.
id say maybe 1/100th
My wife, however, says she doesn't mind if the baby stays in there an extra week or two. They're a lot less work to care for inside the womb than out.
Anyway, your baby should be out of there within three days, tops. Most doctors don't like to let pregnancies extend more than 14 days past the due dat. Good luck to the Kavula family.
Keep us posted.
Huh?
Using that metric, Vlad Guerrero is only half as valuable as ARod. Not sure that salary proportions=value when comparing players.
Does that mean that Derek Lowe and Carl Pavano have equal value?
Why are we so quick to assume that Coletti will not tend to undervalue Cabrera's bad body, alleged attitude problems in the past, alleged poor work ethic in the same way he wants guys who lead, play the right way etc.
We seem to be very quick to assume he'll overpay bad players with perceived intangible attributes, but what's to say that's not going to keep him from giving up too much for Cabrera for the same reasons?
Would a .290/.330/.480 line be considered a disappointment for Kemp in his 2nd year in the bigs?
You need to take into account the HUGE amount of AB's he had.
I find it weird that people are saying Ned won't trade Pierre because it would "admit a mistake". But, isn't the fact that we're even considering moving him to LF already admitting the mistake?
The only way a signing makes ANY sense is if the player is markedly superior to our in house options. Let's say that the odd man out would be Eithier. At least with an Andruw Jones signing, an argument could made (of course assuming he bounces back to form) that the money was well spent because now we have a 40 HR guy in the lineup rather than Eithier.
But in the case of Rowand, it just doesn't make any sense. I don't dislike Rowand by any means, but why oh why would you sign him, which probably pushes out Eithier who would probably put up similar numbers for a fraction of the cost?
I know these are all rumors, and I'm trying not to get caught up in them. But, it's just so frustrating to even read that we're thinking about giving Rowand a shot. If the rumors are true, wouldn't you think there would be someone in the front office that would say "umm...guys? Are you sure this is a good idea?"
While I'll try to take all rumors with a grain of salt, the way this team has been run in the past couple years is absolutely baffling.
maybe we could get Bob to GM for us ;)
What site?
simply to stress another stupid move by flanders.
Very interesting slant...
2nd spot runs / total runs / pct
MLB 2007: 3132 / 23322 / 13.43
JP/LA 2007: 96 / 735 / 13.06
I would welcome Miggy as a free agent, I'm not as inclined to trade the farm for him. I was all for throwing the money at ARod.
I think all of LA would rue the day Matt Kemp plays for another team. He is our ARod in training, at least he has the potential to be a five tool player who can put up monster numbers. He is the best prospect I've seen since Raul Mondesi.
At this point, other than signing Andruw Jones or Hunter, I would be inclined to stand pat on position players who will start. I think Abreu could fill out the infield if Kent retires (I don't see him retiring though) and LaRoche gets a shot at third if Nomar can't produce or vice versa. I don't see Rolen or Lowell manning third.
Eithier could be traded if we commit to Pierre which we've seemingly done regardless of what we grouse about here.
The big fish to catch would still be Johan Santana and he isn't on the trade block yet and I wouldn't trade for him unless we lock him up for a few years. If the Twins let him go FA, then he would be a cornerstone to build around and he would only cost money, not our Kemps and Kershaws.
I am VERY hesistant to trade Bills and or Kershaw because Lowe is a FA after 08 and we only have Penny locked up thru 09 (if we pick up the option). We'd have to get McDonald and/or Kershaw into the rotation with Bills and still have a need for arms after 09. Schmidt might come back and pitch, but we really don't know who he'll be, we just now how much we'll pay him.
I hope Ned and co. look beyond '08. The kids deserve a shot at some point and we need to go one direction or the other, we can't go both directions at once like we did with LuGo last year. I think from what happened this year, we should let the kids plug away starting in April. Troy Tulowitski didn't get off to a great start, but by sticking with him, Colorado found a gem. So did SD and their third baseman.
Kemp, Loney, and even LaRoche deserve a shot to join Martin on a Dodger team that can be quite good for a long period of time.
i'm talking about compared to each team, because we are dealing with alternatives that we may have.
To be honest, I'd have been happy last year, and this year with an outfield of Kemp/Repko/Ethier.
It's possible. However, his problems in that area go back a few years. His main character flaw now is his immoderate love of Boston Cream Pie.
Loaiza seems to be a calculated gamble to me. Here is why I don't mind the move at all.
He doesn't give up a draft pick.
All that is lost is money.
Loaiza has the potential to be very good.
Hendrickson will earn roughly half of Loaiza's salary in arbitration, so the money is actually not too bad.
No kids lost in the transaction.
id have NO problem with him starting for us.
vr, Xei
I would have too. There's no use in us ripping Pierre since we're stuck with him but I just can't understand the logic behind the move.
You know when some of your friends will do something so stupid that you're more aghast at their rationale (or lack) than the actual act?
That's how I feel about Colletti.
Next.
vr, Xei
Kinda funny that very similar things were said about Cabrera a couple years back as are being inferred about Kemp right now. Just because a guy has a bit of an attitude doesn't mean they won't out grow it. Florida's probably pretty happy they didn't deal their "attitude problem" for pennies on the dollar back then.
vr, Xei
Could the Dodgers look to trade for another third baseman like Adrian Beltre?
http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/023971.php
That's the OF I wish we had.
on the other hand, think what the Dodgers could have gotten for Edwin Jackson and Greg Miller in '03 and '04. Hanrahan never did crack the starting rotation either.
But it supports my love of Jayson Werth, so I'll allow it :)
http://tinyurl.com/2bgg48
Come on people, this is ridiculous in 2007.
Kemp seemed to have hit lots of really hard ground balls (with line-drive characteristics) last season, which, coupled with his Bison Speed™, helped lead to his gaudy BABIP numbers. Perhaps this is a repeatable skill and he'll have fairly high BABIP numbers for awhile. Though he's definitely due to regress with BABIP. Anyway, if he can improve his slugging and perhaps his patience, maybe he can offset some of the regression.
More than one potential Pac-10 champion has seen its season run aground on the rocky reef that is Tucson.
Just win the Pac 10 and the worst that can happen is the Rose Bowl.
No, I just like saying "rocky reef."
318
I think Jacob has set off the Eric Enders alarm.
As a Cal fan in 07, its my role to go slump in the corner.
Cal lost to (unnamed university in Southern California)
(Unnamed university in Southern California) lost to Notre Dame.
I'm slumping more.
Cal at least gets a trip to El Paso!
Outside of (unnamed university in Palo Alto), SC has, remarkably, had only the one loss to... you guessed it, Oregon!
I am not prepartying, nor will I be partying or postpartying. I'll probably watch the first half and then go to bed.
Will this happen?
LaRoche
Kuo
Elbert
Ethier
Young
Houlton
Brazabon
Pierre
Kent
He better have been paid handsomely. I assume he was.
Was he in White Collar Resort Prison, or FPMITA Prison?
During the criminal investigation, evidence was obtained including positive tests for the presence of anabolic steroids and other performance enhancing drugs for Bonds and other professional athletes.
There's a joke in there involving role reversals and injecting cream and/or clear, but I'm not going there. I'm not even bringing it up.
I'm not going to prison for any of you people. I'd never be a party to cover-up shenanigans, nor would I give up my freedom for somebody else's transgressions.
Not for a penny under 5 million.
Man, he flipped?
This is a misconception I hear on DT from time to time. I challenge you to find any way in which you can compare the CF that Does Not Exist (DNE) and Gary Matthews Jr. (GMJ) and have the non-existent guy come out on top.
Here's a head start with their 2007 stats. Just for fun I included Andruw Jones (AJ) and Aaron Rowand (AR).
------ DNE -- GMJ --- AJ ---- AR
EQA - .248 - .256 -- .251 -- .294
RARP- 12.3 - 13.7 -- 13.0 -- 44.8
WARP3 3.4 -- 6.6 --- 6.4 --- 9.6
:D
What about a package of LaRoche, Pierre, Meloan, and a so-so'er like Houlton for Tejada?...
What kind of OBP do you think he can put up while in prison?
Pierre: +5
Matthews: -26
I can say pretty confidently that Pierre had a better year.
No one of any value. If management is willing to do a straight up salary dump and include a prospect as the "cost" of taking Pierre, then management would be willing to demote Pierre to 5th OFer (where he would be quite good). He's not making so much that his salary has any real effect on acquiring better players. It's his playing time that is the real monkeywrench. Demote him to 5th OFer, give playing time to the 4 other OFers that are better than him, and keep your accompanying trade chip from above.
How about Juan Pierre, Jeff Kent, and tons of money for Brandon Phillips?
It's interesting to note that Spawn of Kavula will be born into a world in which Barry Bonds is under indictment.
Someone call OJ and tell him to fire up the Bronco.
Bristol would explode.
With every genius business idea, there's gotta be a first. Like, like the guy who first thought of delivering pizza to people's houses. Or, uh, the guy who invented crack.
As for the guy who thought up delivering pizza, he basically paid my college tuition. So, I kind of like him.
A player gets credit (a "plus" number) if he makes a play that at least one other player at his position missed during the season, and he loses credit (a "minus" number) if he misses a play that at least one player made. The size of the credit is directly related to how often players make the play. Each play is looked at individually, and a score is given for each play. Sum up all the plays for each player at his position and you get his total plus/minus for the season. A total plus/minus score near zero means the player is average. A score above zero is above average and a negative score is below average. Adam Everett turned in the highest score we've had in four years of using the system with a +43 at shortstop in 2006. That means he made 43 more plays than the average MLB shortstop would make.
And most metrics like zone rating or RZR have Pierre near the middle and Matthews near the bottom
is it really news? I mean that stuffs been floating around for a while now.
http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/cat_probabilistic_model_of_range.php
Stupid A-Rod. In your face, Boras!*
*Enjoy your commission, Scott.
Seeing how bad Matthews is defensively, yes, it's an easy win. 31 plays in the outfield is a huge difference.
That is the question that I have, would any team take Pierre plus some serious money and a lower level prospect for a mid-level prospect?
I don't see it happening. My ideal solution is to sign Andru Jones for the a 1 year contract with incentives, not give up any of the youngsters and really see what you have.
While I think most fans ultimately back a winner, there does seem to be something special about these youngsters and a close comparison to the youngsters of the 70's and early 80's.
Oops, sorry, forgot that he DNEx.
#3.
#1.
then #2 doesn't at all.
Strangely enough, I can't picture Albert getting a contract that big.
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=2656
What do you think the motivation for the trip to China is?
A) PR/Marketing ploy for MLB
B) Prelude to Dodgers setting up some kind of baseball camp/operations in China
C) Olympics related
D) Chance to do some sightseeing, shopping and taste some great food.
vr, Xei
"Expect a player's performance in an upcoming clutch at-bat to be much more like his overall performance than his past clutch performances."
AND
"For all practical purposes, a player can be expected to hit equally well in clutch as he would be expected to do in an ordinary situation."
There are all kinds of tables supporting these claims.
vr, Xei
Thanks...
I'm also really kind of shocked that Pierre put up a 16. I was looking for him way down in the negative ranges.
November 15, 2004: Barry Bonds is named NL MVP for a record seventh time and becomes the oldest player to win the award.
JimBeau (Left Coast): What will be the five worst signings this winter? (And for extra credit, the worst trade?)
SportsNation Keith Law: (3:05 PM ET ) Romero, Rowand, Hunter, Linebrink, Glavine, and the worst trade will be whatever trade the Dodgers make that includes one or more of Kemp/Kershaw/Billingsley.
Keith Law doesn't suck. He must be lonely at ESPN's baseball analysis division.
My mother said I howled.
So that's why my mom never would go to the dentist.
age 21 302/350/483 OPS+ 117
age 22 324/371/589 OPS+ 150
age 23 316/378/600 OPS+ 146
age 24 345/410/664 OPS+ 162
age 25 307/377/566 OPS+ 139
Miguel Cabrera
age 20 268/325/468 OPS+ 106
age 21 294/366/512 OPS+ 130
age 22 323/385/561 OPS+ 151
age 23 339/430/568 OPS+ 159
age 24 320/401/565 OPS+ 150
age 25 ....????....
Miguel Cabrera is basically Vlad Guerrero a 6-8 years ago.
Bob you would have had no problem with me then but i'd take you now.
No just kidding, I honestly have never gotten in a fight in my life. As a soccer player, I had enforcers.
thats true. But in terms of being a hitter, they look really identical.
If Piggy could ever be motivated to work on his conditioning, he could age similar to Guerrero.
Gosh, I am so torn. Sucks to be Colletti.
age 20 .280 .322 .447 104
age 21 .314 .366 .540 143
age 22 .328 .365 .558 151
age 23 .322 .378 .600 166
age 24 .326 .386 .546 153
age 25 .355 .401 .636 181
Hank Aaron!
Sabathia could eat Cabrera.
yea but fat pitchers age better than fat hitters.
Brandon Jennings looked pretty good the other night, nice get for you guys.
And yet, I can't ever stop watching it when it's on.
LingOL?
When you venture to both of these like I do, rumors fly around like Jacobs Field gnats.
Where is it on?
http://tinyurl.com/2fwhym
Hmmmmmmm.....
I was watching an early Kubrick movie, Killer's Kiss this weekend. It was laughably bad.
thats the problem, if it were only a couple of good prospects, the trade would have been done already. Its for the top left handed pitching prospect in baseball and the 2nd best 3b prospect in baseball plus other players.
Not merely just "good prospects".
The Dodgers should not trade established Major League players.
When I was younger, so much younger than today,
I never needed anybody's help in any way.
But now these days are gone, I'm not so self assured,
Now I find I've changed my mind and opened up the doors.
Help me if you can, I'm feeling down
And I do appreciate you being round.
Help me, get my feet back on the ground,
Won't you please, please help me.
And now my life has changed in oh so many ways,
My independence seems to vanish in the haze.
But every now and then I feel so insecure,
I know that I just need you like I've never done before.
It will be on again early morning, if you want to Tivo it.
Hi gullllls.
I actually do this and have been doing so all week.
...so the movie is finished and they're screening it for the UA executives. The lights come up and there is silence. Then one says, "I don't know what I just saw, but I think we're going to make a lot of money."
In my opinion, 100 years from now, when people want to know who the Beatles were and what made them so special (other than some pretty great music), they will have A Hard Day's Night to show them.
Red Sox rotation that won the World Series.
Josh Beckett (traded 2 of their top 5 prospects in a salary dump deal)
Curt Schilling - Free Agent
Dice-K - Free Agent
Jon Lester - drafted
The problem is that for as long the Dodgers have these young players at manageable costs, they will be targets for trades.
It's like the proverbial train wreck; you know that it ends up very badly, but can't stop watching it happen.
Sorry, Jon.
The problem is the D's can't seem to make good trades or FA acqusitions. Is it luck, or lack of brains?
Kim Ng is the queen of arb, I doubt Miggy wants any part of her arbitration wrath.
The Broncos scored 11 points Sunday.
Help!: "With this ring, I can -- dare I say it? -- rule the world!" That still cracks me up.
Plus, it's fun to watch the Beatles try to act while they're high.
______________
About a week later, A-Rod contacted Mallory, a friend who works in private wealth management in Goldman's Los Angeles office. Rodriguez knew the Yankees have a close relationship with the investment bank, which was instrumental in the launch of the team's YES Network.
Mallory called Cardinale, who works in the merchant banking section in New York and helped finance the network. Cardinale in turn got in touch with Yankees president Randy Levine.
A-Rod and the Yankees exchanged proposals via the bankers, and the deal gradually was framed in about a dozen telephone calls.
________________
hilarious.
Come on, Ducks! Overcome the Leafness of your quarterback. Quack Quack!
Lousy.
They'd all be 1-1 against each other and the next tiebreaker would be record against the team in fourth place, which will either be Cal or Oregon State.
They'd all have wins over Oregon State. But Oregon lost to Cal so they'd be out. Then it would be back to ASU-USC head up and USC would prevail.
If one side has all the power and doesn't have to play by its own rules, then no matter what kind of scumbag is on the other side, it's understandable why one might feel disgusted about the result.
I think I saw that on an episode of "The Rockford Files."
Gee, poor Arizona.
That's nice to know.
I was referring to this episode of "The Rockford File"
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0688045/
It dealt with abuse of the grand jury system by a US Attorney.
All that math gone to waste.
So USC needs Oregon to lose twice? Even the unnamed school in California could beat Oregon the way they are playing now.
I smell an Armed Forces Bowl bid!
517--Unlike local DA's the Feds usually don't lose "celebrity" trials (DeLorean was an exception). Fed prosecuters are top shelf attorneys,in law school they were the ones studying on Saturday night while the rest of us were working on our third pitcher of Bud.
I've seen every "Rockford Files" episode at least three times.
Arizona State - only Pac-10 team never to make the Final Four. And may it remain that way.
Cool stuff DzzrtRatt. for a guy well respected around here you kind of have a goofy name.
If UConn can make the leap to 1A (or FBS), than so can Cal Poly.
I take it that Brock says that because they do not border the Pacific.
Portland State and San Diego State it is.
Say hello to the good people of Pullman!
I take pleasure in Arizona's Rose Bowl shutout. I always think to this SI cover, "Rock Solid":
http://tinyurl.com/2puv2v
This might be a stupid question, but Cal Poly Pomona or Cal Poly SLO?
I have friends/relatives that went to each, and both schools steadfastly refer to themselves as simply "Cal Poly".
I know SLO has a football team, but does Pomona?
538 can't be worse than Kansas State. Tailgating in a field. We had WSU in in Seattle, which was nice.
Oregon is UO or U of O. OU is Oklahoma.
Cal Poly SLO's teams are billed as "Cal Poly" and they play in the Big West.
Presumably this Cardinals power hitter was not SLO grad Ozzie Smith?
That was my answer first!
/Whambulance
what do you guys think of this? I think I can get on board if its a one year deal.
We even used that nickname affectionately. I always think that the overuse people ascribed to Broxton was laughable compared to the way Lasorda ruined Niedenfuer.
Could work. We just have to stagger the injuries appropriately.
I once made an incredibly fast U-turn in a narrow road.
After I did it, I felt very Rockford-like. And somewhat amazed at how I didn't wreck my car.
http://tinyurl.com/2pz228
A Corleone-type plan.
It's all one big 1970's cop show to me. And they all drive David Soul's car from Starsky and Hutch.
That's why you don't appreciate "Freaks and Geeks" as much as I do.
On a tee, Timmermann. For you.
If you keep that up, I may end my boycott.
But not yet.
He said he was going to be early.
Does Arizona have the dumbest fans in the Pac-10? If they stormed the field after being the unnamed school's scout team, what will they do after beating Oregon?
Burn down the stadium? Go on a long pillaging raid of the city of Tucson? Form themselves into organize gangs of looters stealing beer and portable DVD players?
I got curious so I looked thru my cards & his name is Tom Brunansky & he DID IN FACT GO TO CAL POLY POMONA check it out [ http://tinyurl.com/ysgf6n ] while looking threw my cards I found out I have Grag Biggios rookie card!! whoo hoo!!
Niedenfuer was probably wrecked by Lasorda, but,also, he was never the same pitcher after he married a Hollywood starlet
I looked him up on Baseball Cube. Brunansky grew up in West Covina, so Cal Poly Pomona would have been a likely place for him to take classes. Another bio I found of him said that Brunansky was offered a football scholarship to Stanford.
Can't
Beat
Stanford
(That's for the CBS games.)
He's gunna cost 10 mil for 08 and 09 and has sucked really bad last year.
But 2 years of suckiness is less than 4 years of suckiness.
These people have no shame. They aren't happy. They're just drunken idiots.
There's a lot more of Tucson to pillage than there was back then.
I resent that.
There wasn't enough time to get drunk before the game.
And judging by how Oregon played without Dixon, that's not that outlandish.
Don't you just wish you knew management's true feelings about Pierre?
That's the problem. Their true feelings are dumb.
Stop reading my mind.
The other guy hurts us every day. And for four more years.
Then again, Nomar is technically our current starting third baseman, so maybe I'm giving entirely too much credit to our GM.
I like the rotating 5th (injury-prone) starter idea between those 3 guys. Could work! Beats Tomdrickson. Just have to, yeah, make sure they plan their injuries accordingly.
--
Btw, belated return to this topic, but to those of you who love Hard Day's Night as I do, have you ever seen Richard Lester's The Knack (and how to get it)? Great fun from same era.
--
30 Rock was so money tonight. Laughs-a-plenty. Man I'm gonna miss that show.
--
Lastly, my soccer team lost 2-1. We've only given up 5 goals in 4 games, but we've only scored 2. (Small goal league.) We need a ringer. Is Kaka available?
https://griddle.baseballtoaster.com/archives/317999.html
You don't update "The List" on a whim.
Also, I always liked Christa Miller.
"His Girl Friday" is on TCM right now, a very good movie.
They've made me so mad, that the school in Tucson is now the "unnamed school."
There will be no spelling "U.C.L.A." that will be tolerated here.
Yea, I think so. Isn't that why nate doesn't go to the games?
At Oregon, the fans wait until the game is over before they rush the field. Where was the security to prevent the students from going on the sideline?
Also, I need to go back and update my list on your list comments. Some people have been granted reprieves, others have been moved to death, others need to be added.
"His Girl Friday" was a very good movie, definitely one of the better "comedies" of the era. Two other quality classics I watched this week were "Rebecca" and "12 Angry Men", both totally watchable after all these years.
615 I like to see a good beating now and then.
Mmmmm...Joan Fontaine. How I adore thee.
vr, Xei
I heard a recent interview with Joe Pantoliano who said that Cary Grant was always an underated actor and this film is an example of how good he is at his craft.
USC
Cal-Barkely
ASU
Oregone
In the AP:
USC - 1
Cal - 2
ASU - 6
Oregon - 2
In the BCS:
USC - 11
Cal - 12
ASU - 4
Oregon - 2
Do you think Kemp can play at least an average centerfield?
And do you think Delwyn can be decently above replacement level in the bigs?
And I think the answer to both questions is no.
They don't come faster and more furious in pace than His Girl Friday, though, amazing dialogue. Rosalind Russell holds her own with Grant.
Jennifer Jason Leigh sort of pays homage to her in "Hudsucker Proxy."
With USC and ASU playing on Thanksgiving, it's impossible for the loser to get back up in the rankings. But I am rooting for chaos.
And USC winning the Rose Bowl.
Yeah, I said it again. But only because it's true.
Gooooooooo, Eagles!
Nooooooooo!
-- although I still hope you're right. Or at least I hope that columnist is right.
634
Which Eagles? The Rock Group Eagles, the Philadelphia Eagles, or the Boston College Eagles?
---
Nate, I'm loving the "piggy" reference. Such a simple moniker cracks me up so! How do you do it?
---
Since I have the luxury of time, I'll list the priority list of offseason moves I don't want (for the Dodgers) from worst to best.
1. Trade Kemp, et al
2. Sign Torri Hunter
3. Sign Aaron Rowand
4. Sign Andruw Jones
5. Sign Livan Hernandez
That's my top 5 so far.
But yes, chaos is the key to the BCS. I'd love to see enough crazy stuff happen to get Hawaii a title shot, but I doubt there is that much crazy left in this season.
Ahhhhhhhhhhh!
Awugal wugala Ah!
Fight on, dear old Muncie,
Fight on, hoist the gold and blue,
You'll be tired, torn and tattered,
Once the Munce is done with you.
Gooooooooooo, Eagles!
But fans in parts of Southern California will be very happy.
I'll drink to that!
And Ohio State won't be in the BCS championship.
I was told today that the Kansas-Missouri game is no longer called "The Border War", but "The Border Battle."
Because "war" implied bad things. Unlike a battle.
Oregon and Oregon State will still play their Civil War.
Colletti fired, Kim Ng becomes GM.
The new GM commits to LaRoche, Kemp, Loney.
Nomar is traded, we pay the bulk of his contract.
Our CF is traded, we pay the bulk of his contract.
James McDonald is given the chance to join the rotation out of ST.
Andruw Jones is given a one-year deal to prove his worth. We overpay.
Jeff Kent is told to shut his mouth.
Delwyn Young is a super utility player.
A man can dream.
http://tinyurl.com/229qoq
Hey, he was the World Series MVP. David Eckstein must be wondering where that big payday is.
I'll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I accept Ned Colletti. The Mustache is no friend of mine.
---
I dunno if Hudsucker is "better" than Fargo, but having watched them both fairly recently I can attest to the fact that HP sure is more enjoyable. Just like someday we'll admit that, yes, No Country for Old Men is superb, but I'd rather re-watch Raising Arizona than the former.
--
Okay, too much Barry Bonds blather on ESPN. It's either Barry Bonds, or drooling on the Patriots or Celtics, on that channel this week. TV off, book open, night everyone.
The Dodgers are rumored for just about everyone, in any cockamamie scheme a bored sportswriter can think up, because they do have so many young talented players. These rumors are mostly garbage for that reason, we have no idea of knowing if the Dodgers are involved in any of them, but just the sheer repetitiveness of what each report says ("the Dodgers are a good fit based on the number of young players yadda yadda") make them all suspect in my eyes. This one from Chicago was basically the last straw for me.
No, you don't. Back off my girl.
It is one of the old school points that annoys me.
I think a White/Ng partnership would be fantastic. Two smart heads are better than one terrible hairpiece.
Why does there have to be one Grand Pubah? Shouldn't teams look at redefining the way front offices do business?
Long story short, division of labor would be okay, and teams should redefine GM roles.
"Jason Schmidt was cleared today (11/15) to begin throwing, and he'll likely start with tossing next week in Arizona."
"The interest appears to depend on a lot of things," Landis said. "The Dodgers are apparently focusing on a veteran club and various ways to spend money. Aaron is a candidate, and so are other people via trade and free agency. It's still in the early process."
http://www.pe.com/sports/baseball/dodgers/stories/PE_Sports_Local_D_dodgers_notes_16.3431112.html
I think that there are a lot of clubs that are going to wait and see what happens regarding teams offering arbitration to their free agents, already one club was said to be wating until December 1st, 9:00 P.M. PST to see if the Padres will offer Michael Barrett arbitration before making him an offer.
The Winter Meetings do not begin until that following Monday, December 3rd, so by that point rosters will be set and arbitration offers will be given so unless you are a lower tiered free agent or just going back to the original club, I don't expect a lot of major moves for another 2 weeks.
I'm fine. I was one of those who thought
1. The Ducks probably wouldn't win all of their remaining games
2. Even if they did, they probably wouldn't make the National Championship game
3. Even if they did, they'd probably lose
Of course, he also said he's "not really happy Arod is coming back", so I don't exactly trust his instincts. He's glad Joe Torre's gone, because he doesn't think the Yankees did enough sacrifice-bunting and hitting-and-running.
And with that, our collective day just got a little brighter.
I guess the presence of an opt-out clause will provide some indication as to ARod's agent's involvement. If it's there, (unnamed agent) was probably involved. If it's not there, ARod probably acted on his own.
I've read here (I think) that if Boros wasn't directly involved one of his "people" definitely was.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3113499
Mrs. DC: Dear, what's this? $500 to Chico's Bail Bonds in Tucson?
Sam DC: Uh, see, there's this guy from the internet. He, um, met a dancer. Um. Because Arizona beat Oregon, so it was a big day. . .
http://tinyurl.com/2e763p
Just trade Kent already.
Interstitial ads are the scourge of humanity. Not unlike peaches.
The Dodgers seem willing to part with a package including the likes of outfielder Matt Kemp, pitcher Chad Billingsley and infielders James Loney and Andy LaRoche
Does this mean all four, or some combo of 3 or fewer?
Have you tried FireFox's "Adblock" feature?
http://marlinthoughts.baseballtoaster.com
yet?
To update our East Coast viewers, the fans of the easternmost school in the Pac-10 were put on notice and the school will no longer be spelled out by me.
My boycott against UCLA ended.
I hate the fans of the easternmost school in the Pac-10 with the heat of 10,000 suns and 4 supernovae.
Those cats are wild.
I would rather trade Kent and Abreu to Texas for Kinsler.
Even Captain Jacoby?
See also: Ross, Cody.
You will get to see how the Lakers match up against the East very quickly with games against the Pistons and Bulls this weekend.
It's good to see that others have caught Baseball World Cup fever!
But don't forget the Dutch in the semis! They're tough and their pitchers aren't giving up many runs.
No, the good pitchers have been Diegomar Markwell, Robbie Cordemans, and Leon Boyd.
Last night I forgot to add "Mike Lowell" to my top 5 "list" (see 635 ). It looks like Lowell is going to the Yanks anyway, so thankfully, one less thing to worry about.
A very strange question: You know, the problem with the second half of last season was pitching. So... If Ned has to make a move, why is he so focused on position players?
I guess email or a letter... Or send a singing telegram or carrier pigeon.
Because Jeff Kent and Derek Lowe said the problem was with the young hitters.
Ned's too much of a Sabean Protege and Giant (did I mention he was still wearing his Giant ring after being hired by the Dodgers...?) to get rid of Messrs. Kent and Lowe instead of Messrs. Kemp, Loney, Billingsley, LaRoche, Kershaw, etc.
Or LAT.
I have no sane choice but to embrace the theme around here that ridiculous rumours take on a life of their own, and people just take the list they read somewhere else and add their own touches.
It looks like Oregon State, by only a couple of miles.
http://tinyurl.com/37vmh9
I believe that would be Oregon State.
705 - as in our DT friend, or as in the newspaper?
Given how the three proven major leaguers on that list performed last year, my theory is: If three of those four are on the table for Florida, the deal would be done by now. You're not going to be able to find a better deal or a dumber GM to deal with, so Florida would want to jump on it now before someone in LA comes to their senses.
That they haven't done that yet leads me to believe it isn't real. Someone's lying or trying to make something happen by floating these names publicly. It could be someone inside the Dodgers' FO who hates all the damn kids and thinks we need more PVLs and need to spend a lot more money. It is even more likely someone inside the Florida FO who wants to prove to local media and all 19 of their fans that the team hasn't given up. There is also probably a desire to force the Angels to up their, as of now, tepid offer. If someone clever and very competitive was in charge of the Dodgers, he might let the impression stay out there as long as possible that these four players were on offer to the Marlins in order to weaken the Angels further by forcing them to give up another good player. We do have to play those guys six times, plus compete for the affections of Bill Plaschke.
Someone who likes pasta, perhaps?
Can somebody please explain this to the moronic sportswriters in America? This echo chamber of trade talk has got to stop.
We should be actively shopping Nomar and the player who does not exist. Ned seems to be infatuated with "character" yet Derek Lowe is still on our team.
I could not agree more with this statement. If this is true, then Miggy would be taking a physical in LA today. My guess is that both the Angels and Dodgers are offering three of the players mentioned, but are balking at the fourth. I just can't see a scenario where Ned trades ALL of our young pitching for a position player. Maybe one or the other, but not both.
---
Yah, the way I hear tell it, the Dodgers done landed the big prize by giving away the player they call th' Minotaur, and The Chad, and one Bison, and a Loney, plus a LaRoche, and all of their Vegas 51s, and a heap of cash, by gum, that's how I hear tell it.
Soon the "prospective package" for Miggy will include Penny, Kershaw, McDonald, Elbert, and Billingsley. Now that ARod is officially off the market, it looks like the papers need something sexy to sell copy.
I don't dispute that. But if This Dugout's Not Big Enough for the Two of Us (Kent/Lowe and Kids), then Kent/Lowe should be the ones to go.
Generally, it has been my observation that fans talk big but rarely make a stand where it counts, at least in Los Angeles and particularly with the Dodgers.
If we trade the future to make those two clowns happy, then I want 90 percent of their pay moved into the incentive category. If we don't win the World Series, they don't get paid. If Kent and Lowe are so sure this is the way to go, they can put their money where their mouths are.
Plus, some portion of fans "making a stand" involves fans who already bought tickets not going to games, a rebellion that isn't reflected in official attendance figures.
Washington St.
Oregon St.
Arizona St.
Then again, you're no fun.
Off the top of my head:
soups/stews
Pan Fried steaks with a red wine cream sauce using the juice from the steaks and the peppercorn seasoning.
Last night channeled all the stress and frustration of this week into the perfect storm at my softball game. I fully admit I shouldn't have said anything after the first bad call, but it apparently opened up a target on me with the umpire thinking, "you think that was a bad call, I can top it the next time".
Needless to say, I almost got kicked out of the game for arguing. I am ashamed of that since I umpire games, so I did apologize afterwards for my behavior.
First they get left out of the BCS despite finishing 2nd in both non-computer polls. They lose Kellen Clemens to a season-ending injury when things were going really well. Now this.
I would feel worse for them if they didn't have the backing of Phil Knight.
Uncle Miltie -- yes, I used to teach at Oregon, now I teach at BYU. Which should be in the Pac-12, along with Utah.
Gotta say that as an LSU diehard, I wanted to play Oregon more than any other team if we could get through these next three weeks. Losing Dixon was just brutal...like SC losing someone like Leinart during their run.
What a funny word "bevy" is.
In the 60s and 70s when I read a lot of Playboy, it was used frequently to describe all the women I would see in the magazine. A "bevy" of comely gals.
Associating "bevy" with a bunch of football players sets off an explosion in my brain, as I am hard wired to imagine naked young women. No wonder Oregon lost, my brain says. You can't play in the Pac 10 with a wide receiving corps of naked young women and expect to win.
That is more than fortunate, that was unbelievably lucky.
I don't think Ned is going to trade kids just to make Lowe and Kent happy. First of all, none of their sniping even started until Luis Gonzalez was on the team. Now that Luis has moved on to older pastures, I doubt we'll hear as much from the other two.
UCLA is very good at feasting on teams that used to be perceived as good.
Exactly. I'm don't support the Nike sellout and the Walmart/SUV/Megalomania culture that tells us that newer and bigger is better and that Oregon should tear down Mac Court and such.
I'd like to have a winning team, but not at any cost.
I'm rooting for BCS chaos now, like I usually do. I want as many one-loss teams as possible. I'm in favor of any situation in which the clear choice for a BCS berth is in doubt.
And Nate hasn't even woken up yet!
I would never say that Carroll is lucky since he is obviously a great coach, but it seems that injuries finally have caught up with his team this year after 5 relatively healthy years.
"The Dodgers are apparently focusing on a veteran club and various ways to spend money. Aaron is a candidate, and so are other people via trade and free agency. It's still in the early process."
That team has been a shadow of its former self since Norm Chow left, and as bh stated, they've finally faced the injuries that every other team has.
I love my Tigers, but I don't buy in to the fact that the SEC would mop the floor with the PAC 10. I hear it in the local media down there, but I don't buy it. SEC football is more physical defensively, but much less dynamic on offense (save for Florida and South Carolina) than the PAC 10.
Being an LSU homer, I think we would beat just about anyone from the PAC 10 this year, but I don't buy that LSU, Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, and Alabama as a group are markedly better than USC, Oregon, and Arizona State.
In college, I think that you only really need those things you mention. Most coaches are either offensively (Urban Meyer, Mike Leach, Jeff Tedford) or defensively (Nick Saban, Pete Carroll, Les Miles, Bob Stoops) minded.
USC's problem currently is that Chow was so good, that it has been tough to replace him. If you can recruit, motivate, and really know at least one side of the ball, that makes for a pretty good coach in my mind.
Two words: "Bud Bowl"
Oops I think I meant "Lingerie Bowl." I get beer and ladies underwear confused sometimes. Sounds like Nate had the same thing happen to him last night.
Thanks for the heads up bro.
He really loves that staff...
I definitely liked that as well. You never know...with the way things are going, Kansas could lose, Ohio State could lose to Michigan and then Arizona State could be right there.
Ned making a crazy trade for Bedard or Miggy and having to watch Kemp, Bills, and LaRoche go out the door.
Us making a crazy FA signing like the rumored Rowand signing.
I think we can recover from a bad signing, but a bad trade could screw us for 3-5 years. Just an observation.
Doesn't that signal that they aren't going to moving the pitching prospects?
He can't be very familiar with Elbert, Kershaw or Mcdonald since he's been with Vegas for the last two years and last worked for the Sun's in 2005. He should be very familiar with Chad, Houlton, Meloan, Hull and Kuo.
Never heard of that Bob Schaefer. Perhaps Ken can enlighten us on his bench-coaching skills.
Glad for Ken Howell about his promotion. That's cool.
BUT there is nothing that starts the day off worse than looking at the morning box scores at a bad trade (Pedro/Piazza etc)
1) wake up the manager
2) tell him if a lefty or righty is coming up to bat
3) tell him if a lefty or righty is warming up in the bullpen
4) doublecheck the lineup card to make sure everybody is in the right order
5) write whimsical memoir
779 If Jason Schmidt is the first thing on your mind, than I am rethinking my plan to live vicariously through you.
Hate is too strong of a word, but I hope I never run into Fred Claire anywhere.
Who's in charge of waking up the bench coach?
Bench coaches live on espresso and Red Bull.
I do believe that you should be willing to give up almost everything for elite level talent. A 90 run player is worth far, far more than three 30 run players, maybe even more than three 50 run players, especially when you have money to spend.
Baseball managers are put to sleep by either Mr. Jack Daniels or Mr. Johnny Walker Black.
Well it was the first time I ever got hit on by a dancer outside of umm..their domain. So it was pretty cool. She asked if I wanted to ditch my friends and go some place with her but I had better judgment not to. She put her number in my phone and said she was dancing tonight and I should come.
I don't know if I should. I'm kind of intimidated...her name is Gauge for crying out loud.
His hitting might convince the Marlins that he is good enough to be the highlight of a package instead of Kershaw or Kemp.
793 It will either be amazing, or it will be a great story. Either one seems good to me.
Nate, you have audience of attorneys, dads, soon to be dads, media employees and basically mostly guys who don't have that opportunity presented to them so even if you have lie, go for it.
789--A lot depends on how much you trust the people evaluating the talent; I'm not sure when for every plus move (Ethier) you get Baez,Hendrickson,Seo and Lance Carter.
Read at your own peril:
http://tinyurl.com/2zechq
Long-term means last semester of senior year stripper booty call right?
I have mandated in the past that the Dodgers should put their Major League players off the table. Players like Bills, Kemp and Loney are not prospects anymore.
Even without them, we have a top 5 system in the minors. The community over at minorleagueball rated our system as #2 or #3...and thats from a group that includes maybe 4 frequent Dodger fans.
I don't think they are the same.
Poor girl. She appears to have been typecast.
For some reason, that typo made me laugh.
I'm beginning to wonder if bluebleeder's typos are intentional because they are getting funnier and seem to pop up in strategic places.
Course if she picked you out of a group of students I expect you will have plenty of opportunities for years to come.
oh, o.k. thanks.
I've wondered about that for a long time.
Holy Cow! I just put that up at work. Got to call the IT guy and get him to erase that. Own peril is right...
If something is written or broadcast, too many journalists tend to give it instant credibility and run with it as fact. Usually they won't have any way to verify the accuracy, nor much interest in doing so even if they do.
Unlikely a writer clear across the country has better info than someone closer. Not that being closer guarantees accuracy.
For many in media these days the watchword seems to be "stay tuned for more breaking speculation."
Ok. Now I yield the soapbox. :)
It's not a typo.
I am making a new word.
In five years, you'll all thank me.
It was lawyers who decided to start spelling "indite" as "indict" and not changing the pronunciation.
But the note is kind funny . . .
http://tinyurl.com/2aqaho
I would normally say that, but some of the New York media has been running circles around the LA media lately about everything that has to do with the Dodgers.
Not saying that is the case here, but there is definitely less interest in the kids here in LA media than there is elsewhere.
By the way, any of the lawyers in the crowd looking for contract help?
They are also reporting that Rowand is seeking $15M per year. "Seeking" is a lot different than "getting", but geez $15M???
Also, as I predicted, once the NBA started, LA becomes a Laker town especially now with USC not having championship aspirations.
Man I am sheltered.
Yeah, I saw that $15M number and was awed as well. This from a guy with an OPS+ of under 90 just two years ago.
Seriously, someone lock Ned up in a nice comfortable cabin somewhere in Alaska for the next two months and take away his cell phone.
here's how I imagine the negotiations will go down.
Ned: We're set to offer up 9 million a year
Agent: We want 15
Ned: DONE!
Then we get introduced to our new four year 60 mill CF.
"She's a dancer? I assume the kind involving a pole..."
I hope to have a review up for it on Monday.
As loopy as Lasorda is now, I was bummed that I did not make it out to one of the book signings so that my kid can have a copy with his name on it.
Vivica A. Fox: I'm a dancer.
First Lady: Ballet?
Vivica A. Fox: No, exotic.
Or something like that.
Someone has to read it. I'm more than willing to take one for the team.
It's also not very long. It's just 236 pages and it's not like I'm trying to read James Joyce.
Um...
W
O
W
Oh, then he says that Jason Giambi "stole $120 million" because he stopped producing.
Other than his spot-on unintentional Chris Rock impersonation, Smith is completely useless.
Pretty awesome conclusion, considering that is about the only thing he didn't do wrong in this situation.
Tommy Lasorda, who once hawked spaghetti sauce and ribs, apparently found time to befriend Presidents and Sinatra while having the greatest job (except for when Fox owned team) in the world now comes forth with stories that you may have only heard 100 times but never bound together and on nice paper to boot.
Bill Plaschke was brought on to fill in the spaces left between Tommy's strange choice of using only adjectives when talking about himself and the Dodgers.
And it's yucky.
(if you search Rule 13 in the sidebar search box, i expect you'll find your way to an explanation)
My guess is that very few days go by in off-season without a story and once July hits, probably non-stop until after the Super Bowl.
I'm not entirely sure I follow, but that's probably close enough for me. I don't think I've ever violated that rule.
Good. Can you read this thread for me too?
And that's about it... So I can understand more how the Redskins dominate the coverage.
But then again, the Lakers have been consistently competitive for years, almost never missing the playoffs, and there's no NFL team, and the Dodgers have had a lot of ups and (more) downs the past 20 years, so I guess that sort of makes sense, too.
It's a column on Bonds, still feels like a twelve year old wrote it.
He also gets something wrong, saying that there was a time when Latin players couldn't play in the majors. If I recall correctly, white Latin players have been in the majors since the 1800s.
I wish it could apply to the entire Internet.
My message to all bloggers and blog commenters today is:
Things that were funny the first 100 times (charitably), are not funny the next 1,000,000 times. Come up with new stuff!
There was a Cuban who played in the National Association in the 1870s and then there were no Latino players until the early 20th century. The Latino players still had to be white.
When the player in the photo in this link:
http://tinyurl.com/28r7dx
started playing for Washington in the 1930s, people complained because everyone said he was black.
And outside of that, what has the media demanded that the McCourts or Ned have actually gone out and done.
Now, I think the paranoia is that the local media is of a win now philosophy but that kind of comes with the territory.
But unless I was sleeping for the last 4 years, the impact of media on the Dodgers has been very minimal if not non-existent.
No?
On the plus side, NedCo wouldn't have a chance to trade the kids.
878 - I think, quite honestly, if Simers and Plaschke had taken the long view on DePodesta, he would not have been fired.
I would respectfully disagree. I think the McCourts just fire people because they can and they will switch over to the first shiny object they encounter.
I've found that you don't even have to use coins. Gum wrappers from Wrigley's work too.
Hit it like the fist of an angry god.
Bill Plaschke could give politicians lessons on seeing which way the wind is blowing and then going that way.
I recall a column this year where Plaschke had some type of checklist of complaints he had received about Dodger Stadium and he went there to see how they were being resolved and he came back with a quite favorable impression.
What is considered "Latin" (or Latino or Hispanic) and who could or could not play major league baseball in the US has been problematic for a long time. Mainly because Americans have peculiar views of skin color and race.
In the early 20th Century, some players objected to Native Americans getting jobs on teams because they were viewed as "foreigners."
Seriously. Ed Delahanty was quoted as saying that.
I recommend "Playing America's Game" by Adrian Burgos on this topic.
From that book I learned that in the 1950s, some black players would affect an accent and pretend not to be able to speak English because they would be served in some restaurants in the South because they would serve "foreigners", but not blacks.
A possible exception may occur if you can prove you actually did do this.
Somehow, they were going to ignore that and take his word about some 3-4 year plan?
id like that alot.
and is anybody else noticing that LaRoche is raking for the u.s. team right now?
i still say we keep all the youngins, sign Jones, trade pierre for a relief pitcher and pay some of his salary
Jose Molina got 2 Million to backup Jorge Posada. What a gig.
Every time I see stuff like that I think of the players I grew up reading about in the 60's, living in nurses homes, trying to make it off their paltry pensions before Marvin Miller broke the chains of slavery.
Has anyone told you that you have done a good job losing your accent? I have a friend of a similar age and background as you and she told me that someone asked that of her. She politely held her tongue at the time.
885 - Look, there's no changing what their opinions of what DePo were. I'm saying if their opinions were positive, and DePo hadn't become a PR nightmare, I think he'd have gotten another year at least.
886 Yes they do do that. But what they perceive as shiny seems to be what the media thinks is shiny.
Delwyn Young is 2 for 19 in Taiwan though.
all i picture is austin powers: gold member....
i love goooooooooooollddd
http://videoeta.com/movie/98652
(yes, it's SFW.)
I still think of the Lo Duca trade as being a mistake, not that Lo Duca shouldn't have been moved, but because of the timing of the deal. I'd have waited until the off season to make a deal, maybe we don't have Penny, but we are also saved the heartbreak of Ch-i (and the subsequent redemption of Loney).
Unfortunately (or fortunately), I don't review films for Variety.
It was pretty evident that DePo was right about that. It's funny how just three years ago Odalis, Weaver, and Lima were the playoff rotation for a team. Time sure flies in baseball.
I'm glad Mariano Duncan is back though.
R for strong horror violence and gore, nudity, sexuality, language and drug use
Which of those is Danica involved in?
and yes keeping duncan was good. the bench coach was kinda out of left field i thought...not that the bench coach really matters but.
Disclaimer: it has not been proven how much the owner listens to the sportswriter.
Philosophically speaking, I don't believe in trading an every day player for a starting pitcher during the season. Plus, I think at the time, we had enough pitching to pull it off in the playoffs. But that's water under the bridge, as they say.
touche.
i always thought it that relief pitcher who never pitches an inning yet the coaches always act like they are torn between keeping 11 or 12 pitchers.
i thought he answered the phone....
trades are also done (i hope) with long-term goals also...
cannot deny who got the better end of that deal.
http://twitchfilm.net/archives/009751.html
Okay, by the time I get back from lunch and a doc's appt, I expect this to be well over 1000 posts. Buena suerte.
"targets" confused me.
"Sylvia Janowitz, a well-endowed foreign exchange student."
Sounds like she's involved in the Gauge-esque scenes.
Although "Johnny Vital" falls for Emily (Danica).
we were 15th in HR's in the NL and 3rd in Slug%
Am I the only one who thought that when Nate was talking about a dancer he was talking about a member of the Dance Squad for Arizona?
The "quotations" gave it away for me.
I'm so glad we're only talking about Nate's wild night and not something more dramatic from the Dodgers. Rowand scares me though.
Except for the Cowboys and Packers. They can burn. That's the latent 'Niner fan in me.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
well played sir
As a counterexample, the 1988 World Series champion Dodgers traded Pedro Guerrero for John Tudor.
"Brad Penny presents an interesting issue as far as QERA is concerned, since the stat believes his 3.03 ERA was far off the mark from his true performance of 4.63. Looking at his peripherals, it's easy to see where the disconnect in true performance and ERA lies, as Penny only managed to strike out 5.8 hitters per nine while walking 3.2 for a pedestrian K/BB rate just under two to one, though his groundball rate of nearly 50 percent is obviously a plus. The peripheral that improved Penny's numbers the most was his very low home run rate, as he allowed just 0.4 per nine on the season. This number is a little deceiving though, as Penny did not allow a homer for the first two months of the season, and then had a HR/9 of 0.6 from June 3 onward. You would certainly take 0.6 HR/9 though, even if that entails fewer strikeouts.
"Penny changed his approach somewhat by relying more on groundballshis G/F moved from 1.2 in '06 to 1.6 in '07and his reliance on his sinker helped generate quicker outs and faster plate appearances by the opposition. This compensated for the dip in punchouts and the increase in free passes, and the drop in his home run rates also helped out. Even if Penny were to return to his former homer rates, he could probably manage an ERA in the threes for a team that's going to win games for him. He won't get you strikeouts like in years past, but he'll get outs and innings."
http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=6933
BACK!!
I'm going to eat lunch now. I think the lack of food is getting to me.
didnt we have the worste defense in the league?
doesnt that make his era and wins and what not even more impressive?
and yells "back" on a pickoff attempt
http://www.knbr.com
no tinyurl this time
http://www.insidesocal.com/tomhoffarth/archives/2007/11/the_clippers_be.html
Oh, wait. That's just ours. And Zimmer.
I love this growing support for my "eliminate superfluous managers and coaches" crusade.
For some reason that being quoted by "--Giants" made me lol
Can the Clippers have the Clipper Spirit Girls mob me when I nail a halftime half court shot?
we already discovered that the bench coach wakes up the manager.
and bobs and weaves a la the braves bench coach...
speaking of wierd coach things...dusty baker's tongue thing he does is nasty
http://tinyurl.com/348jov
1. Communicate Clearly
2. Be Animated & Loud
3. Make Snap Decisions
4. Encourage Aggressive Play
but grady little was pretty unimportant.
Pirates Decline Option On Izturis
http://www.nbc10.com/mlb/14619259/detail.html
Picking up the phone in the bullpen seems more important than yelling "BACK!!"
Yeah, It was very cool. The backward over the head shot seems to be the way to go. A guy used that same method to make a 1/2 court shot to win a car either last year or the year before. Time is blurred.
975
The girls look hotter on TV then close up. Not saying I'd say no to any of them but when your 5 feet away the imperfections show up. It also makes you wonder why woman in their mid 20's are dancing at basektball games. There is one new Spirit brunette who appears to have zero imperfections. I would need to get closer to really make a final determination. We may need to bring in Nate to find out for sure as I don't think I'll ever get closer then 5 feet.
Insight sponsors a bowl game. They must be an upstanding company.
Not anymore.
http://www.truebluela.com/story/2007/11/16/12240/006
there are like at least 6 other people in the bullpen to answer the phone...
only one guy by first base
Don't most teams have a hitting coach doubling as the firstbase coach?
yea, them.
Apparently the dot com has been banished from their name.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.