Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
History is what happened, not what I wish it would be. New revelations might add or subtract from that history, might force me to alter my interpretations of events, but they don't erase what happened on the field, in the record books or, most of all, in my memories. The homers, the strikeouts, the visceral images in my mind joy and pain remain. The rewrite exists as a new chapter. And, the rewrite, as reliable as it might or might not be, is rarely the last chapter.
Eliminating unfair advantages is a worthy if quixotic goal. Unfair advantages on the socio-economic level, putting aside the physical level, begin at birth, and multiply both with and without our intending them to. Pretending that unfair advantages don't exist or haven't existed throughout time is pointless.
No asterisks. What happened, happened. We don't have to like it, but it happened. The game was what it was; life was what it was. We should always try to do better, but we can't do so by papering over the past.
Clarification: My "no asterisks" statement refers to the record books themselves. I thought that was implied, but that was a little careless of me. The fact is, I place a mental asterisk next to this era, as I do with other events in baseball like the pre-integration era.
It's simply not practical to alter the baseball record book. There are too many people involved, simultaneously, to do it. That being said, what's the imperative? When a missed call determines victory, when a team wins on the strength of a fifth down or the clock not running properly, do we go back and change the result years later? No, we live with it and try to make sense of it. Maybe, if there's a chance for it, have a laugh about it.
There are a million events in history that I'd like to change. Applying Liquid Paper to the encyclopedia won't change them.
But just because someone's in a record book doesn't mean you have to honor him. The record book provides information of what happened - your decision of how to interpret that information is your choice. For example, some will think it's a bad thing to be in the record books for most losses by a pitcher in a season; others will find ways to admire the feat. It's up to the individual to decide, though certainly we can talk about it - maybe even come to a consensus from time to time.
The news today will alter some of my interpretations; it just won't change what happened or how much I enjoyed it while it was happening.
We're living, thinking creatures, each and every one of us. We can interpret. We're capable of perspective. We don't need baseball to impose it for us. We need baseball to take steps to address this problem for the future.
Barry Bonds is the perfect villain/scapegoat in this. If this report is able to show that Bonds wasn't the only famous, successful player that used (Pujols? Deadspin is vindicated!) perhaps Bonds won't be singled out so severely. And it sounds like the conclusion of the report will be to (rightfully) place the majority of the blame on Baseball and the Player's Association. So with the exception of the millions of dollars this wasted, and the unusual amount of attention it received from Congress, I'd have to say this is all a good, cleansing process. Not it's time to move on. No suspensions, no asterisks, no revisionist history. Play ball.
What do you mean?
Actually, I take back the word "apologetics". That isn't quite right. I mean instead "encouraging everyone to forget the past and move on".
Less traffic on the roads.
Is Jon really encouraging everyone to "forget the past"? Move on, yes. Forget, no.
Agree , I'm glad that Arod and Griffey aren't named. They were guys who just could mash when many of their contemporaries were cheating.
Pujols is kind of a Shoeless Joe Jackson moment. Say it ain't so.
I'm glad Andruw didn't get named, but I remember him playing for Greenville Braves years ago and jacking one completely out of the park in Huntsville,Alabama.
I wonder if this could give teams grounds to void contracts,like Nomah for example. Maybe
we could plant some clear in Pierre's locker.
LuGo deserved at least an honorable mention.
It's not quite a say-it-ain't-so moment, because I think deep down we all knew what the reason was for that 10 mph jump in his fastball right before he was moved to the bullpen. Albert Pujols, on the other hand...
Though, nice to see Big Hurt, Piazza, Beltre, Griffey, A-Rod, Andruw, and others aren't on it.
Fun times ahead.
Then again, "ought to" and "are" are two different things.
Nor could it have, in the absence of direct admissions from players. Everything else is speculative. Even positive drug tests are often explained away, whether legitimately or not.
Must've REALLY goofed up.
It consists almost entirely of the usual suspects, guys that have already been busted, guys that have had a history of injuries and several oddballs who have some sort of name value (Rocker, Garces, Kile). And many of those names are misspelled.
It could prove to be totally true in about a half hour, but it seems like a list any one of us could have created in two minutes.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/mvp_cya.shtml
No real point. Just making a joke on a sad day. Nothing to see here. Move on.
Depending on the level of evidence this report represents, I doubt there will be any substantial punishments from MLB. If there are, they will be heavily challenged by the MLBPA.
Have you ever began one of your baseball history talks at the library with "I'm not here to talk about the past"...?
I only talk about apologetics if I'm there to discuss C.S. Lewis.
Does your library carry "The Screwtape Letters"?
Shawne Merriman is in the NFL, and was suspended for 4 games last season.
Shawn Marion is in the NBA, and is the Matrix.
One or both of those guys could help our bullpen this season and would be a better alternative to trading someone like Ethier for bullpen help.
13 different editions in English, plus one in Russian and one in Spanish.
Dodgers: Hendrickson
Padres: Morgan Ensberg, Jason Lane, Jack Cassel, Ryan Ketchner
Rockies: Darren Clarke, Sean Barker
Giants: Scott Munter
D-Backs: none
"I have more information than anybody else has. I know that."
Even if he is injured, it seems he'd be worth gambling on with a minor-league deal -- if he'd accept such a deal.
Re: All players
"I systematically ignore a large portion of information that a lot of other people look at. I know that."
I would imagine Otsuka will have enough suitors to make a minor league deal unlikely. There was talk this week of the Padres possibly bringing him back, thus punctuating their great trade with Texas (getting Young & Gonzalez) by also getting back the best player they gave up in the deal.
The "system" I envision is "new stats" that "Baseball People" typically deride.
And right on the heels of that, Merriman got to star in a cool commercial for Nike all season long.
I love the NFL, but the doouble standard between pro football and MLB or the NBA is really sickening.
Across the board.
It could have positive effects:
One, the games would be better as the players would be in better physical shape.
Two, it might discourage youngsters from putting their entire dreams into such difficult goals as being a pro athlete. If the downsides of being a pro athlete are that you have to take drugs (that could possibly hurt your body) in the future in order to make it, maybe more kids would give up on that and pursue something more meaningful to society.
I dont see the harm in making PED's legal. I also dont think there's enough evidence to state that PED usage always leads to poor health. There's a ton of things that lead to poor health, and since its America and we have rights to pursue our own happiness, we are allowed to do those things as long as they dont hurt others.
There does not seem to be a consistent and identifiable logic behind why some drugs/foods/etc. are legal and some aren't.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/14/sports/baseball/14mitchell.html?em&ex=1197694800&en=6adaa7fdd3f9dc4b&ei=5087%0A
Either Calero or Otsuka would be nice additions to the bullpen. I don't know what the Dodgers' level of interest is, but for reference sake, both players have two years of arbitration eligibility left. Calero made $1.6m last year and Otsuka made $3m.
I'd prefer Otsuka over Calero, in large part due to Calero's fly ball tendencies which wouldn't play well in Dodger Stadium.
if i see Griffey's name I will be crushed...I was givin all of his rookie cards when i was a kid, some signed.
He has always been to me, the Anti-Bonds.
His All-Out play caused him so many injuries, diving into walls, trying to get out of rundowns.
If Grif would have stayed healthy HE would own the record, not Bonds. Bonds became a defensive blob late in his career, Grif has suffered because he never stopped playin with all his heart.
I don't care what stats yall show me, Griffey will aways be the best all-time player to me.
Instead, he's a free agent (if I understand correctly) and the Rangers get nothing.
Systematically ignoring a large portion of information that a lot of other people look at.
As long as you extend your support to legalizing marijuana the NBA Players Association is in full support of your idea
Drug--yea sure it is.
"Peformance Enhancing"--no.
I'd only allow PED's to be legal.
Not drugs that hurt performance.
How does Colletti decide that speed contributes to victory anyway, other than it feeling like it should?
http://tinyurl.com/2rhb5f
There is also info in there about the Rangers not being able to have Otsuka until after May 1 since they non-tendered him, but I'm not sure if that is true anymore.
It has lots of photocopies in it.
Because Ned wants to continue being paid for what he does, rather than expose his imcompetence.
what if andruw did juice, but mitchell missed it? is he a lock for HOF (if he has the numbers at career's end), but pujols and clemens aren't, because they were named?
if the point is really to clean up baseball, pointing fingers doesn't help.
Larry Bigbie!
Paul Lo Duca!
105 No, that pretty much covers it.
http://files.mlb.com/mitchrpt.pdf
Dear MLBAM,
Way to suck.
Thanks,
Andrew Shimmin
Nook Logan in there I'm told.
Bill Plaschke weeps today.
Eric Gagne!
When will the Mitchell Report Rebus be released, Bob?
I'll be reading the Mitchell Brothers report next.
No wonder Lo Duca was so eager to sign that deal with the Nats.
In my case, yes. The "PgDn" button is getting a lot of use today.
Paul Lo Duca and Gagne were teammates with the Dodgers from 1999 to 2004. Although he is not sure when, Radomski recalled that Lo Duca called Radomski and told Radomski that Gagne was with him and wanted to buy human growth hormone. Gagne then came onto the phone and asked Radomski a question about how to get air out of a syringe. This is the only time Radomski spoke to Gagne. Radomski said that Lo Duca thereafter placed orders on Gagne's behalf.
Radomski said that he mailed two shipments to Gagne, each consisting of two kits of human growth hormone. One was sent to Gagne's home in Florida; the other was sent to Dodger Stadium. Federal agents seized from Radomski's home a copy of an Express Mail receipt showing a shipment to "Dodger Stadium, c/o Eric Gagne - L.A. Dodgers Home Club, 1000 Elysian Park Ave., Los Angeles, California 90012" dated August 9, 2004. A copy of this receipt is included in the Appendix and is shown below. Radomski said that this was for one of the shipments of human growth hormone to Gagne.
:(
That's great. I'm going to write "laundering for tax evasion purposes" or in the memo of my next check.
I can see the next Visa commercial. The line is going real smoothly with everyone paying for needles and pills with their Visa card, and up comes Heart & Soul writing a check and everything comes crashing to a halt.
Estalella's apparent use of performance enhancing substances was noticed by club officials. After the 2003 season, the Los Angeles Dodgers considered signing Estalella as a free agent. During a three-day meeting of Dodgers officials in late October 2003, assessments were made of many players, including the possible use of steroids by some players. Ellen Harrigan, an administrator in the Dodgers' scouting department, kept detailed notes of the discussion. Among the comments she recorded was an observation by one of the participants that Estalella was a "poster boy for the chemicals.
The Dodgers had a book on who was using?
So, trading LoDuca wasn't just about getting Penny.
It's also a good idea when you consider that most of the guys in the Dodger line up are line drive hitters rather than home run hitters.
It's all about how you build a team. If you have a team where you don't expect a lot of home runs, then you have to look at other ways of scoring runs. Nothing wrong with having speed on the base paths. But, then, I'm a big fan of scoring runs anyway possible.
On the flip side, Depo did resign Gagne...
I'm scrolling through, haven't seen it yet.
Lo Duca's reputation takes hit after (deserved?) hit. I'm not sad at all to see his name in the report.
Donnels said that he told Dodgers athletic trainer Matt Wilson that he was considering using performance enhancing substances. Wilson told him to "look it up on the computer" and said "I don't need to hear anything about it."
This is getting ugly. The Dodgers are all over this report.
leaked lists were wrong
Hurray DePo!!
LoDuca comes across as the team pusher. Not a flattering portrait at all. Gagné was one of my favorite Dodgers, but has gone down in my estimation. More disappointed than surprised.
Todd Hundley
F.P. Santangelo
Chris Donnels
Todd Williams
Phil Hiatt
Adam Riggs
Paul Lo Duca
Kevin Brown
Eric Gagne
Matt Herges
Jeff Williams
Ismael Valdez
... We didn't exactly get off light, did we?
This is a depressing day for baseball.
If I could type the waaa waaa sound, I would.
I blame Kirk Radomski.
Not by all of us!
http://truebluela.com/story/2007/12/13/14334/529#readmore
Lenny Dykstra
David Justice
Troy Glaus
John Rocker
Matt Williams
To me the biggest losers were the players who perhaps never made it because a Paul LoDuca or F.P. Santangelo was using and denied them their one shot at the big leagues.
notes of an internal discussion among Los Angeles Dodgers officials in October 2003... Steroids aren't being used anymore on [Lo Duca]. Big part of this. Might have some value to trade... Florida might have interest... Got off the steroids... Took away a lot of hard line drives... Can get comparable value back would consider trading.
I agree. People who think that sub-par performance is evidence that a player didn't use roids ignore the fact that roids don't make you a star per se, they only (might) make you better. Thus, they can mean the difference between being in the league as a bench player and not being the league at all.
I also just want to say again, that this is a an essentially random sample of evidence based on the spots where Mitchell managed to get some cooperation -- it really should not be considered a comprehensive report of the scope of steroid/HGH use in baseball during the covered time.
http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/024224.php
"Update: Mitchell is asking the commissioner not to discipline players named in the report. He wants closure on the issue. That's a good recommendation."
I think most people (rightfully) consider this the tip of the iceberg.
I don't care if steroids played a part in the deal, I only care that it made the Dodgers better.
If you meant to refer to 184 , my bad.
Is it possible to have negative respect for a person or is zero the floor?
what effect did steroids have on Gagne's curve and change?
I remember following Gagne from his major league debut in Florida in 1999. He was one of my favorites as well.
There may be other theoretical benefits as well.
Take that Plaschke! It wasn't all DePo's fault!
Noted.
1. 1910-1929 - Gambling, highlighed by Black Sox throwing 1919 World Series.
2. 1901-1947 - Denial of inclusion of African-American and others on the basis of race.
3. 1980's Cocaine Era
4. 1972-1994 -Labor unrest highlighed by cancelled season and World Series/
5. 1990-Present - Performance Enhancing Drug's
I vote in this order, denying Blacks the right to play MLB and gambling are at the top, PEDs is third.
You may read the story by searching for the phrase "on the evening of october 4."
In order to provide Xxxxxx with information about these allegations and to give him an opportunity to respond, I asked him to meet with me. He did not respond to my request.
There, I just did.
shocking!
It's only cheating if it's against the rules. And maybe if it's illegal, though that gets fuzzy.
Xxxxxx wasn't there to talk about the past maybe.
John Kruk on ESPN: if this is true about Clemens, then there is nothing different between him and Bonds, other than personality.
Yeah, John, if you'd been paying attention, you'd have figured out that a lot of people don't like Bonds because he's a jerk. Jerks get many fewer passes than nice guys.
Look, the use of steroids is wrong. I'm just scanning the Mitchell Report (pdf.) and finding out that Mr. Heart and Soul was a user. Daniel, I'll admit to you that unlike the terribly bright people who post here, I'm more emotional, less "researched" than most. But I have seen first-hand the effects of steroid use. It provides a significant boost to muscle mass for those who work out. When I was a sportscaster, I got in trouble because on air I said the effect of steroids seemed to be similar to sticking a hose up your backside and turning the air on. Guys who were using who were already big got much, much bigger.
I hear you, Daniel, I really do. It just doesn't seem right. Too many people are willing to write off steroid use as "not that bad" when it comes to health and the integrity of the game. I think it's terrible on both fronts.
End of rant.
I don't think I'd regard Clemens as a "nice guy" either, so you're talking no difference at all.
---
I love how Jeff Kent was named on the report, but only for his erudite quote:
Major League Baseball is trying to investigate the past so they can fix the future.
No mention of whether Kent had any comments about trash cans.
I saw Chris Donnels in a High School alumni game after he got released. He struck out twice, against High School pitching. Must have been off cycle.
3.5.05 - Paul DePodesta
So, Paul DePodesta assembled the current mess of Dodgers with steroid use a major consideration. He wanted a clean team, he told the LA Times.
So he lets go of Steve Finley, one of the healthiest guys in baseball? He dumps Shawn Green, who probably wouldn't go so far as to even take a multi-vitamin? He lets go of Alex Cora? Dave Roberts? Paul Lo Duca? The only juice these guys were on was apple juice. Yet he picks up Jose Valentinwho many have their suspicions about. What a load.
http://tinyurl.com/2mljsh
There is also the off season training element to HGH, which I think is the more important use. The ability to recover quickly after training means the possibility of more intense training (beyond what a guy could normally do) which could, conceivably give a player using an unfair advantage (off season work outs 6 days a week vs 4-5 days a week).
Though it's hard to imagine just how bad he would've been without steroids!
225 Speaking of Gonzaleses... where's Luis in there?
(Not that this is a list of everyone who took steroids... just those who were caught/talked to the investigation/etc.)
It seems standard practice to announce that you're outraged and are contacting your lawyers, but to never actually file a lawsuit.
(And who, thanks to me, are believed to be steroid cheats by everyone in my office. I think maybe I need to contact my lawyer.)
Rational or rationalization. A thin line.
Yes, much of the time he is. However his offering today was more a pleasant sheen, a narcotic, offered from one fiend to another to help maintain their love of the game...their heroes...their memories. Guilt free, and winning the crucial battle against dissolution.
Oh yes, they'll tell you with worldly sophistication that they "became dissolutioned long ago". Well, they haven't. And never will. The mind is willing, but the heart won't allow it. And you are your heart.
I don't have a heart. I just have a lump of coal there.
I mean, if some people want to reject baseball, they have my complete blessing. But the game had a flawed history before I was even born - why would what happened today change my view of it?
Think about the "arm"adillo Bonds wears at the plate. It helps him hang over the plate, but he's got a medical waiver for it, so its legal. The probelm is it's huge and is it really necessary to protect an elbow injury with a hockey pad? Also, who paid the doc who signed off on it?
From the AP:
"Everyone involved in baseball over the past two decades -- commissioners, club officials, the players' association and players -- shares to some extent the responsibility for the steroids era," Mitchell said. "There was a collective failure to recognize the problem as it emerged and to deal with it early on."
Fehr scheduled to speak later in the day.
Several Dodgers officials participated in the (October 2003) meetings, including special scouting advisor Gib Bodet, senior advisor John Boles, general manager Dan Evans, team physician Frank Jobe, athletic trainer Stan Johnston, manager Jim Tracy, advance scout Mark Weidemaier, senior scouting advisor Don Welke, and director of amateur scouting Logan White.
So does Tracy love LoDuca in spite of the rampant speculation of his drug use, or because of it?
Everyone involved in baseball over the past two decades -- commissioners, club officials, the players' association and players - shares to some extent the responsibility for the steroids era,'' Mitchell said. "There was a collective failure to recognize the problem as it emerged and to deal with it early on."
Not if there's no edge to be gained. Then you just have to ignore it, and let the players figure it out for themselves. It'll often be like taking antibiotics for a head cold, but, so what? Durability is variable, and has always been part of the game. But is it a skill? Is baseball better because you never know if one of the players is going to pull up lame for six weeks?
I'm grasping for very thins straws, I know.
It almost parallels the way the PA has protected the elites huge contracts, perhaps at some harm to the journeymen, although recently it seems everyone is getting plenty of money.
If I have any other thoughts, I'll pass them on.
And maybe he planned to flood the Silicon Valley in order to gain a monopoly in the microchip market.
i think he meant rationale
Agreed.
But maybe I've just watched too many movies.
The fact that players were evidently so cavalier about the whole thing reflects/suggests:
1. Usage was so pervasive and accepted that they didn't feel they had to hide
2. Players felt so protected/coddled/entitled/etc. by owners, trainers, MLBPA, etc. that they felt the risks of being punished were miniscule
3. Maybe they're not that bright.
288+291 Sounds about right to me.
Or dirt. If he was breaking down with the juice how good will he be without?
Only the Mets, with Radomski, come off as bad as the Dodgers.
http://www.truebluela.com/story/2007/12/13/151121/72
it's not enough to blame particular players or bud selig. clearly each team went along with the ruse.
(btw, long time lurker, first time poster. today was obviously a big day and finally brought me out of the woodworks.)
The players' union, Mitchell writes, was "uncooperative." Right after Mitchell sent a memo to each players, the union followed up with a memo saying not to cooperate. Orza refused to be interviewed. I think that the right thing for a player to do would have been to cooperate as to your own involvement but not name anyone else.
He's talking right now about how he had a family to feed and couldn't take the risk of stirring up issues that would hurt the team when he was a GM.
I'm not watching him, but gimme a break.
These guys aren't heroes: they're just baseball players. A lot of them are probably jerks, just like the rest of us.
I've booked a trip to Paris in June to see Radiohead on consecutive nights. All tickets are general admission. The venue is Paris-Bercy. On the fan website, they say you can stand or grab a reserved seat once inside. On the venue website, I can't find capacity for the show or a standard seating chart. It's in French, I don't read French, but I've clicked on everything and I can't find seating info. I think it just doesn't exist.
http://www.bercy.fr/infos_pratiques/acces_bercy
1. Has anyone on DT been to a show there?
2. Does anyone on DT speak/read French and would be willing to look at the site and make sure I'm not missing something?
Good karma if you can help. I don't want to get stuck in the back with a bad view and sound, and I don't want to spend all day in Paris waiting in a big line. I need to get a stategy together.
P.S. The fan site message board is garbage. No help there.
Yeah. It's not as if we, today, all of a sudden learned that a bunch of baseball players were using steroids. We've known it for a long time now. The emotions have had plenty of time to numb themselves.
Even B-Rob shouldn't count ... all the evidence (as per the report) is tht Bigbie said Roberts admitted to it once in passing that he took steroids once or twice in 2003. Sounds sketchy to me.
Chad Allen
Manny Alexander
Rick Ankiel
Mike Bell
David Bell
Gary Bennett Jr.
Marvin Bernard
Larry Bigbie
Barry Bonds
Kevin Brown
Paul Byrd
Ken Caminiti
Jose Canseco
Mark Carreon
Jason Christiansen
Howie Clark
Roger Clemens
Jack Cust
Brendan Donnelly
Lenny Dykstra
Bobby Estalella
Matt Franco
Ryan Franklin
Eric Gagne
Jason Giambi
Jeremi Giambi
Jay Gibbons
Troy Glaus
Jason Grimsley
Jose Guillen
Jerry Hairston Jr.
Matt Herges
Phil Hiatt
Glenallen Hill
Darren Holmes
Todd Hundley
David Justice
Chuck Knoblauch
Tim Laker
Mike Lansing
Paul Lo Duca
Nook Logan
Josias Manzanillo
Gary Matthews Jr.
Cody McKay
Kent Mercker
Bart Miadich
Hal Morris
David Naulty
Denny Neagle
Jim Parque
Andy Pettitte
Adam Piatt
Todd Pratt
Stephen Randolph
Adam Riggs
Brian Roberts
John Rocker
F.P. Santangelo
Benito Santiago
Gary Sheffield
Scott Schoeneweis
David Segui
Mike Stanton
Miguel Tejada
Ismael Valdez
Mo Vaughn
Randy Velarde
Ron Villone
Fernando Vina
Rondell White
Todd Williams
Jeff Williams
Matt Williams
Steve Woodard
Kevin Young
Gregg Zaun
Proving that this whole thing is just a figment of Tommy Westphal's autistic imagination!
Not only in baseball, but in all pro sports.
There's just too much money involved.
Here, take some of this and your paycheck will double!
Everyone else is doing it.
Come on pal, just do it.
http://www.bercy.fr/billetterie/ticketnet/1013/Radiohead
and click on "Soyez alerte", there is a seating chart. Seating seems to be general admission.
-- answering questions at washpost.com at 1:45 Pacific.
http://tinyurl.com/2tuoqu
Maybe HGH makes your brain jelly.
"If Marion Jones got her medals taken away, what's going to happen to these guys?"
I told her the IOC had rules in place and heck if I knoow if MLB did but what will happen is probably nothing.
Still, pretty good question from a non-baseball fan under medication, no?
I'll google around and see if I can find it out. They also have a contact email address for VIP suites. Maybe someone will email me back with capacity info.
http://tinyurl.com/2j5abu
A false assertion. Players took it to recover and/or increase the effectiveness of their weight training. I'd say that's players taking note of it.
It would be, if it worked that way. Cellular regeneration isn't that quick, though, even with HGH, is it?
HGH is a red herring, really. You asked if quicker recovery to baseline would be cheating, and I think it would be. Injury and fatigue is part of the game.
That said, HGH provides advantage. It's production is stimulated by excercise ( among other factors like GHRH, sex hormones and deep sleep). It provides for increased rates of lipolysis (fat breakdown), musclar hyperplasia (growth through cellular division), and protein synthesis.
Let's examine how those three effects affect an athlete in training. The first is of no use to anyone except Roger Clemens and professional body builders. The second is a clear and simple cheat. Most muscle growth occurs by muscle cells increasing in size, not by cellular division. By taking a supplement you're artificially raising the level of HGH beyond a naturally (read: diet and excercise) achieveable level. Threfore, you're stimulating cell division beyond a naturally achieveable rate. The third is also a cheat. Strenuous training causes microtraumas to the existing muscle tissue. These tears are thought to be the cause of delayed onset muscle soreness as well as the basis upon which muscle cells hypertrophy (get bigger). Add in an increased rate of actin and myosin production due to increased, and omnipresent level of HGH and you have a muscle that can recover more quickly from microtrauma and grow more quickly due to the greater availability of the components of the sacromere.
I'm going with my sister, her graduation and birthday gift. She turns 40 in January and earns her BA in May.
She's not a Radiohead fan but has never been to Paris.
Your point is truthful indeed. I'm sure some guys didn't have a problem with it and didn't hide it. I don't think we can assume all users were open about using an illegal drug.
More sacromeres means a bigger, more powerful muscle cell.
They took it, and said it didn't help. Looking at the recovered evidence in the Mitchell report, Ankiel took it for about two months. Do you think he just switched suppliers, do you think he decided it wasn't doing anything, or do you think he decided it was cheating to keep doing it?
"We discovered that people are not like Neo in The Matrix, dodging bullets in slow-mo," Eagleman said.
http://tinyurl.com/yrp5tm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palais_Omnisports_de_Paris-Bercy
Given the seating chart, I'd guess about 13-14,000 for the concert.
I took my mom to Paris for her 80th birthday last May. We did not go to a Radiohead concert, though.
342- Maybe he was getting a finder's fee.
His hair piece is among the worst on the planet.
Perhaps he kept his hands in his pockets when Bonds hit 756 because he didn't want the crazy glue and stapler to fall out while he was on camera.
How can an owner also be commissioner, isn't that a blatant conflict of interest?
I'm ashamed he's a tribe member.
Everything seems to involve lactation today doesn't it?
The ESPN guys are talking about all the hearsay allegations in the report. Unfortunately, the evidence concerning the Dodgers does not fall into that category. Lo Duca and Herges come off like evangelists for HGH.
Has anyone figured out where Mitchell got the October 2003 Dodger front office notes in which Brown and Lo Duca were discussed?
The fact that I'm among the millions who could really care less doesn't make me proud. But it makes me honest.
I feel the WNBA is doomed.
Oh yeah, it is totally doomed. They cannot get anyone to go see it live or on television.
350 - It's responsible for human growth, therefore it's responsible for human growth. Unnaturally causing human growth where and when it shouldn't occur to gain competitive advantage is cheating.
Doesn't weight-lifting do that?
The cheating comes from something being against the rules, and maybe from it being illegal.
I think the WNBA can make it, but it's going to take a generation or two of girls growing up watching (with their parents) and believing that it's a real possibility that they make it.
I feel more or less the same way about MLS. Though I'd put more money on the WNBA celebrating it's 50th anniversary over the MLS.
In my estimation, MLB has very little blame for the problem. What can they do? They are slaves to the union. The only testing they have now is because congress threatened to step in, which is why I am glad they did step in. MLB has signed away too many of it's rights and baseball has become one of those rare few places left in America where the Union is flat out of line. But, if someone does see MLB as the main culprit in these things, clearly they should see the Union as at least equally culpable.
I don't say that this is what it does; I don't know. I will say that I don't think it outlandish to suppose that this might be what it does.
Bender: these humans wouldn't have lasted a minute in the old Robo Leagues
http://tinyurl.com/2v5nwg
I also expect Colletti to swoop in and sign a non-tender or two. There are a few bullpen arms that might be worth a shot.
Soccer (futbol) is a world-wide sport and it can eventually catch on with the masses in the states.
Female sports just doesn't have mass appeal on a professional level anywhere that I know of.
Therefore, I think a men's soccer league succeeding in the states is more likely than a female basketball league.
As always, I could be wrong. I would like to see the WNBA thrive as long as I don't have to watch it myself. Now if my daughter was playing, that would be an entirely different story.
There is no such list AFAIK.
The "public domain" is quite nebulous. Nobody checks in. And nobody checks out.
it then goes on to state that 15 former players were, including LoJuica.
Like: "Are you sure that isn't really flax seed oil?"
374 I must've spent an entire holiday break playing that game. I never could figure out why the Boston franchise had only cyborgs. I guess they figured the cybords' high OBP could outweigh an inability to defeat a tank in battle.
Someone clearly hasn't spent enough time editing Wikipedia pages.
Just in your wardrobe.
Good dream, but that doesn't sound like a good trade.......... for the Brewers.
Custom team of nothing but motorcycles. Win battles without getting hit 99% of the time just spinning. I'd intentionally get into battles running the bases and blow up their fielders for a forfeit, but that quickly got old.
"The renowned leadership of catcher Paul Lo Duca?
A sham."
Nothing against DT, but I'd rather have Elizabeth Shue in my dreams then DT.
This I have to read. I can see Plaschke with the Kleenex as he's writing it.
"But first [baseball] has to feel our pain."
Speak for yourself, buddy. I'm not the one playing favorites with guys in the Dodger Clubhouse.
Plenty of us were big La Duca fans long before Bill used the story to sully Depodesta.
Aside from Gagne, Paul La Duca was the fan favorite up until the time he was traded.
I don't see how any of his involvement in this changes anything. As a Dodger he played with spirit, with skill, and treated Dodger fans very well.
Evidently he cheated, and it is possible he had to cheat to get his chance. Who here would not have done the same thing? If LaDuca had not given Gagne the juice would we have ever had our Gagne moments. Would you take back those moments because Gagne cheated?
I'm not a big fan of La Duca because he turned out to be jerk based on how he acted after he left the Dodgers. While with the team he was a class act outside of the clubhouse.
That's going too far.
Individual race results are thrown out, not entire careers.
Non-sequitur. As an example, my insulin production and reactivity levels would have been just fine 60 lbs. ago. The body does all kinds of things that are counterproductive as a result of normal aging: lenses harden, muscles atrophy, brain cells don't function as well, arteries harden, etc. That's scarcely proof that we shouldn't take measures to reverse those problems.
Alyssa suggests some kind of special recognition for players who didn't use steroids.
And who are those players again...?
lol
Grow up, Alyssa.
The silver lining is that fans can still just try to enjoy the game for the game's sake. Ignore all the hype, the home run contests, the Fox strike zone report by Menin and enjoy the game.
Why does it end in 2005? You really think testing is preventing people from still taking drugs? Maybe a small number are more weary of it, but the ones that want to cheat will cheat.
Just look at the NFL. Do you really think there is no steroid or HGH use in that league? And they have had testing for awhile.
Because that's what this is like, watching a trainwreck.
I am not absolving anyone of guilt, least of all Bud Lite, but just stating my view that this whole search for reactions is a totally sterile exercise, and we should just move on for lack of any other productive action.
On a more sober note, I know a guy who seriously abused steroids along with other substances and had a kid who had profound birth defects. His wife eventually checked out of life and he lives in a world of guilt. What's it say about our celebrity culture that guys would risk that for fan love , hollow records and some bank.
Give me Ruth ,abusing beer and hot dogs any day.
Why is basbeall so different? Is it the individual records?
Records are part of it and people in general just seem to not care about football players doing steroids, because it is practically a given they do. They have been caught in the past and will continue to.
Almost like people are offended that baseball players have to take drugs.
Also, a lot of people think football is a sport for barbarians, while baseball is the intellectual game. I bet there is more intellectual arrogance in baseball fans compared to the other major sports.
Just because someone's in a record book doesn't mean you have to honor him. That's a choice. I won't honor Gagne's streak - that doesn't change that it happened, or that I enjoyed it while it was happening.
We're living, thinking creatures, each and every one of us. We can interpret. We're capable of perspective. I have an asterisk in my mind next to the entire pre-Jackie Robinson era. I'll have an asterisk next to the current era. That's my personal choice, and it works for me. Your personal choice is not that different, and it will work for you. Neither of us baseball to impose it for us.
Who even looks at the baseball record book, and of that group, who looks at it without also looking at baseball history books? Drug use in baseball is not in danger of being forgotten.
When I wrote "No asterisks" up top, I was referring to the record book. Probably should have made that clearer. But I stand by what I wrote - what I learned today doesn't change what I experienced yesterday.
Maybe later on, I can post my thoughts but lets just say that in general, numbers resonate more in baseball than just about any other pro sport.
"Neither of us needs baseball to impose it for us."
My wife and I found out today that we are expecting a boy!
Just wanted to pass that on
Congratulations!
The players cited in it are probably just examples of what a thorough, intrusive study with perfect detection would have found. It is manifestly unfair to focus on, say, Gagne or even Bonds. Thus, if the report is being read as the black list of cheating players, as Plaschke does, it is being misread.
Surely there are more trainers than those cited who routed drugs to players. The proportions are probably off, but the analogy to this report is if we assumed that the only illegal aliens in the US are the ones the feds catch.
The sole point of the report should be to force action on the part of owners, the union and the league to protect the integrity of the game and the players' health. In that respect, the report is valuable if a little behind the curve -- since testing has already begun. But nothing serves the powers-that-be more than to make this report about individual players. Plaschke, always pandering to the crowd, walks right into that intellectual trap.
Sure, he was being a bit sarcastic but his point was, you have to look at each period in its own context. Perhaps Ken Griffey, Jr. and Jeff Kent will get even more HOF love because they are not tarnished by this (as well as Bagwell and Biggio) but to think that this is any different then the Deadball Era, the first juiced ball era, the pre-integration era, the high pitching mound era, the astroturf era or now the PED/small ballpark era, is just ignoring baseball history.
But.
I hate, literally hate, that this happened. This sport has been sullied, badly. Do I need to grow up because of that? I won't. Sports makes me young, reminds me of when I was young, I'm not expecting innocence from my heroes and I know cheating happens but this whole steroid thing... well, I'm rambling again but I just hate that it happened and I really, truly wish it didn't. It's awful.
And it's still my favorite sport. And it will be. And I'm looking forward to the season.
433 - Plaschke's main concern seems to be that because we all bashed the last batch of so-called users, we all better bash this batch of users. As if we all felt the same way about the last batch.
Is making sure we remember to keep Roger Clemens out of the Hall of Fame really the most relevant lesson from today?
By naming names, it sets up a tiered system, damning those who it names and seeming to clear -- at least for now -- those it doesn't. I know that it doesn't actually clear anybody of anything, but I fear that at least one reaction to this will be that "the list is as surprising for the names it doesn't include as for the names it does."
Not naming names would have set up a guessing game, of course, and it's probably best that that's avoided. Also, having facts to back up what he says necessitates that Mitchell names names.
Still, I can't help but wonder if some of the guys who are named are thinking about former teammates who happened to order from a different ring and wonder why their names aren't in the news.
Meaning: it is certainly possible that this is all going to get worse before it gets better.
409 All of the things you list are things that, in a primitive environment without medical science, would be counterproductive from an evolutionary viewpoint. They are in the same category as excess HGH production. Remember that in that light, the only reason for us to exist is to continue passing the genes along. Given enough time and no medical intervention, diabetics, the near-sighted, those with a predisposition towards hardening arteries, and those with execss HGH production would be selected against. We work to elimate all of these, including pitutitary disorders, to increase individual's odds of survival.
Remember: Medical science is not evolution. It is an opposing force allowing the weaker members of the species to survive and reproduce.
Corollary: this remains an open threat to the MLBPA.
More props to David Eckstein for doing what he has done for so many years. And please don't add, "You mean be over-rated?"
WWSH
Well, apart from the fact that he's barely bigger than me, and I am a very small man. If I were any smaller, I would have to shop in the boys' department.
But the point stands. Before we give props to anybody for doing anything "clean," we need to remember that use of steroids in the sport is pervasive. All we know is that the guys named are named, and the guys not named are not named. Everything else is meaningless.
Baseball needs a truth and reconciliation commission. We need to write a "we will forgive" letter to MLB and to its players. Daylight is the best antiseptic, right? Getting everything out in the open, without the fear of anyone being punished, may be the only way to move on.
For your sake, I wish that were true.
Oh well.
http://tinyurl.com/yrbpfu
You're more than welcome to come down to the Central Library and peruse old Copyright Office registers and try to do the math and figure out which law is applicable to which type of work.
Also I know a guy named Augeas who needs his stables cleaned out.
"I remember a game back '06, I was sitting in the Reserved Level when Nomar strode to the plate. He was wearing Dodger blue that night, his bat twitching against the lights of the late night. Suddenly a roar rose as the ball climbed into the darkness. I yelled Nomah but he didn't respond. Yet barely a month goes by when I don't think of that night"
And who is Jed?
This has been another edition of "I wish I wrote that."
464 - I'd actually rather help re-route the rivers.
Since most copyrights now are good for the life of the author plus 95 years, "expiration date" would be a tough field to search on, unless my idea for life clocks in people's palms is adopted.
Yes
This is professional sports where the only goal is winning and entertainment, not sportmanship.
Todays players already have a ton of advantages over their counterparts. From Lasik surgery, TJ Surgery, liquid being squirted into joints so they stay lubricated, to helmets, to body armor. I'm not going to lose any sleep over some additional chemical additives and it certainly won't effect my memory of what I enjoyed. Knowing that Jimmy Wynn was hyped up on greenies didn't change my appreciation for how he could take a walk and hit so many home runs in the hardest park in baseball to hit a home run. Maybe I'm jaded but I don't expect the professional athlete to have any more of a morale compass then the culture they live in.
Did other people take that to mean that he sought and received assurances, as far as they can go, that the core of young talent with not be traded away? I thought it was good to hear anyway that Andruw and the Dodgers thought they had the talent to win in the next few years.
That didn't get much play but it was an interesting comment. I know Kemp is not a Boras client so it wasn't like Boras was trying to project his own. Sounded to me like Andruw Jones was impressed with our kids and wanted them around. A Jones is going to be a Dodger for more then two years. Just a hunch.
Is a Pierre?
It was funny when Boras was saying all those names and then...*Abreu!
*the only boras client out of the bunch.
That said, we are probably selling Abreu short.
457 i feel exactly the same way, with an added tinge of sadness for the present moment.
479 i don't remember seeing bradley's name on the list. is he on it?
Thats fine. But like what D4P is implying, it really isn't that much of a net positive when Jones has Pierre starting to either side of him.
Did you see the Abreu MLE? It showed him with an OPS over 800.
Yea that was surprising. If Team Boras can drill some more plate discipline into him, he could turn out to be like Orlando Hudson.
They still are.
Dusty Baker, Derrel Thomas, Reggie Smith?
He has the NFL Network! He's a witch!
Those Texan jerseys look really stupid.
Same with those notes from the Red Sox about acquiring Gagne.
Questions ;if the Dodgers had these suspicions, did they have any obligation to do anything about them?
Could they have done anything about them under baseball rules, other than eventually trading Lo Duca and Brown, and letting Gagne walk?
Doesn't reflect well on the Evans/Tracy regime; not to mention Plaschke's undying love for Lo Duca.
And I'm shocked you missed. Back to the rebus bus for you. I thought my hint was plenty good.
Is Curacao in Africa or America?
[ http://tinyurl.com/3b3pyf ]
I'm sorry you feel that way. The divide between what I expect from profesional athletes and amateur athletes is as wide as the Grand Canyon to me. I've been reading about cheating major league baseball players for 40 years so it just doesn't bother me.
Every day when I'm being paid to work and I'm reading the internet or writing on the internet I'm cheating my employer of what he's paying me for. I can hardly think the worse of others who also cheat.
Curacao is in the Caribbean.
Smith
Law - a dead ringer for Juan Pierre
Baker
And I guess it will stay that way for a while.
Sorry, I guess I broke Rule 7.
My point.
(Without the "rhetorical, slightly sardonic manner," of course)
No, I just can't be bothered to scroll up.
No, because I didn't want to include the Carribean blacks. For some reason I actually thought A Jones was African-American. I made the distinction because I remember when Delino DeShields bemoaned the fact he was the only black player on the Dodgers and Mondesi wondered what the heck he was. I wasn't trying to be politically correct, as I would normally use the term black or white but in this case I was looking for geographical distinction.
But it disturbs me not to know.
If Bob doesn't clear this up soon, I'm going to have to actually look it up I'm afraid.
Also, I remember Netherlands wanted Jones for WBC.
Interesting read non the less.
That surprised me too.
We have seven of them. (Eurasia, shmurasia.)
All land mass belongs to one or the other.
And the Caribbean is not in Europe.
all of the Islands are small though. [ http://tinyurl.com/28xgb8 ]
http://www.truebluela.com/story/2007/12/11/154835/99
I pulled them from Baseball HQ.
Are we talking geological plates? Or do we just want to arbitrarily assign the islands of the Caribbean to a large land mass? Perhaps the other continents should hold auditions? Antarctica could use some company.
The Netherlands Antilles plays in CONCACAF for soccer purposes, although three states on the South American continent do as well.
All of the Caribbean states are in CONCACAF.
I believe every nation or state should be defined by FIFA. So Israel is in Europe.
I think turning a blind eye to corruption of any kind is a recipe for self-deception and disaster in the long run. Are any of you people parents? "Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil" may make life easier in the short turn, but it's like a virus leading to the slow going-out of the light in the souls of us. There cannot be allowed to be any grey matter in right vs. wrong. This is as true on a family level as it is on a national and/or organization level.
I think MLB has got to introduce drug testing before Division Championship, League Championship and World Series games (similar to what FIFA does in soccer, and what the Olympics Committee does in the Olympics). Anyone testing postive would not be allowed to play, and forfeits all rights to financial (or other) benefits the winning team receives.
I heard that a scout was sitting on a beach when a home run hit by A Jones from another island landed at his feet.
"The caribbeans [sic] ... is a region of the Americas consisting of the Caribbean Sea, its islands (most of which enclose the sea), and the surrounding coasts. The region is located southeast of North America, east of Central America, and to the north and west of South America."
I would have opted for Central America (not a continent either - part of the North American continent) but it seems not. As others have said, Curacao (and several other islands) are awfully close to Venezuela, none so much. mind you, as Trinidad - where they play cricket.
Really good point Connector, it's the never ending story of cops & robbers.
I did not have children because my moral compass is out of whack, so you can rest assured I will not be passing on my bankrupted values. I tend to let my outrage flow toward matters of little importance like war and the like and not toward how professional athletes desecrate a sanctimonious game.
Sad.
I post the MLE's because they are interesting not because I believe in them. After JtD had the great AA season, his MLE showed him with a 500 slug% and I got much to excited.
Still the Abreu MLE was very surprising to me.
535 hah, really? that sounds so improbable it feels apocryphal.
Felipe Alou
Matty Alou
Manny Mota
Nothing beats Bavaria in the wintertime!
But the guy from The Graduate and Boy Meets World is still alive!
One of the things I've learned from raising kids is that there is a strong innate morality. It's children who claim that X is "not fair." As we grow older, we learn that sometimes you have to swallow the injustice of the world -- unfortunately.
Kids play video games now where fairness is a feature programmed into it. In a way, the electronic world shelters them.
It seems like baseball has grown old along with me.
When I was trainwreck's age, I could rattle off all of William Daniels' credits.
507 - I want to believe that athletes at both levels are clean. Even though I know/suspect that many (if not most) at both levels are not clean. Perhaps it's a hold over from my playing days and being the first guy in, last guy out, to think that some one else passed me by because he was shooting up... well, I don't have words to explain it.
The Cardinal women prevail over USC in 5 games and move on to the finals of the NCAA volleyball championship. They'll face either Cal or Penn State.
Jon will have a grudge match against someone here.
A Cal-Stanford final would be interesting.
USC almost pulled off the upset. They were leading 14-13 and serving in the fifth game and then served it long to tie the score and Stanford scored the next two times.
William Daniels made a pretty good living despite almost always playing the same character. Even when he got to be in a musical "1776", he played a guy who had a rod up his butt.
and we're all better for it.
That is interesting that it was so close. I saw the second game and Stanford was absolutely dominating that one. I just figured they would destroy them after that.
One of my earliest TV memories was sitting on my Mom's lap while the whole family watched "My World and Welcome to It." It took me many years to understand why it had a cartoon beginning and end.
In this WSJ blog post, there's this passage that I thought shed some light on the different perspectives fans and players:
I was disappointed, but I could go on. Why? A couple of reasons. One was reading "The Soul of Baseball," a superb book by the Kansas City Star sportswriter Joe Posnanski, recounting his travels with the late Negro League legend Buck O'Neil. Mr. Posnanski told how people kept coming up to Mr. O'Neil to vent their spleens about steroids, figuring he'd agree with them and act like what they expected him to be a paragon of a better time. But Mr. O'Neil wouldn't do that. Instead, he'd say that every player he'd known had looked for an edge. Baseball, and the men who play it, are a lot more ruthless than we think. They have to be it's a big part of why they've survived to play at the pinnacle of their profession.
That's invisible to us in the stands or watching TV and that invisibility is one of baseball's secret strengths. To lifelong fans like me, the smallest details of the game are beautiful the shadow of an outfielder growing long on green grass, the arc of a perfect 12-to-6 curve, the little crouches and hops of the infielders as the pitcher goes into his windup. That beauty also hides a lot of things we can't see and don't want to see.
>> Rodriguez severely criticized his longtime agent, Scott Boras, for the handling of his opt-out, and blamed himself for nearly losing his chance to return to the Yankees.
"The whole thing was a mistake," Rodriguez said. "It was a huge debacle. For me, it was very stressful. It was a very humbling experience. <<
http://tinyurl.com/2ykgas
That was one of the things that really endeared me to the O'Neil book. I thought O'Neil would be a more self-righteous Bob Feller or Jim Bunning type. But he wasn't. He was just himself.
The most sane reaction to the report I've read so far has, interestingly, come from Burnt Orange Nation, a blog covering Longhorns football and basketball:
"MUSEUM DENOTATION GUIDE
* -- Attached to records held by players alleged to have used steroids.
# -- Attached to records held by players who accumulated statistics before African-Americans were allowed to play in the major leagues.
^^ -- Attached to records held by players who scuffed baseballs in any way.
% -- Denotes that a manger was accused of stealing signs on at least one occasion.
@ -- Indicates that a player allegedly used amphetamines of some kind.
$ -- Player or manager may have improperly influenced the outcome of a game or series.
GIFTS UPON EXITING THE MUSEUM
(1) On your way out, please pick up one of our complimentary mirrors and mail it to your local Congressman. Feel free to include a note about how pleased you are that they're happy to pander in front of the cameras to the parents of the poor children exposed to all these evils. If you're feeling spunky, we recommend further applauding Congress' excellence in balancing budgets, managing wars, and avoiding scandals of their own."
2008 Dodgers with option years remaining
Abreu (2 years remaining)
Alvarez (3)
Brazoban (1)
Houlton (1)
Hu (3)
Hull (2)
LaRoche (1)
May (3)
McDonald (3)
Miller (1)
Orenduff (3)
Paul (3)
Repko (1)
Stults (2)
Troncoso (3)
Wade (3)
Note: an option year is used if at any point during the season a player is on the 40-man roster and in the minors (except for rehab assignments).
I did not include Billingsley, Broxton (2), Ethier (2), Kemp, Loney, Martin, or Proctor, who all have option years remaining but virtually zero chance they will be optioned to the minors.
Also, technically Beimel has an option year remaining but since he has 5+ years of MLB service time he has to agree to be sent down, effectively negating his option.
Exactly what I was thinking.
http://tinyurl.com/7g5c5
Yes, and you would have to play Mario 3 and you would know the cheats even though you had never played the game before.
582 I'd like to see The Power Glove boy do this:
http://tinyurl.com/38au6f
lol I knew what that was before even checking out the link. But that guy does use some tricks to do that.
We're too lazy to learn to play.
What next, simulate marraige? Births? Virtual funerals?
Am I the only one that finds Flanders insistence on a short term deal with A Jones counter productive? I'm thinking we all like A Jones, have no real CF in the system besides Kemp and beetlejuice...wouldn't 3 years of Torre and Andruw seem nice given he's only 30?
Two years, he hits 30+ hrs and hits the market again.
We're cryin in our beer.
It's so bad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCEsLHNT0Bc
Boras and Jones either wanted short term or long term, no in between.
As for the death of our culture, that's a little blown out of proportion, no?
http://tinyurl.com/33galo
I was told some people on World of Warcraft had a virtual funeral for one of the people they played with who actually died. But apparently, they told everyone where they were having it and to leave them alone and some people came by and killed them all.
this is hilarious.
Until Jorge Piedra gets as much hate as Barry Bonds, I'm not buying this as a "we all hate steroids" thing. Heck, this thing has made me feel sorry for Barry Bonds, do you know how terrible that is?
I voted at least 10 times.
People must love the rebus puzzles.
if you can recover sooner than normal then fatigue plays a far less role in things...hitting home runs is based on contact and bat speed. If HGH causes less or no fatigue because you are recovering quicker then you wont lose bat speed caused by fatigue and may hit more home runs. the same with pitch velocity, and the amount of innings and pitches a pitcher is able to throw at top form.
those facts alone are a form of Unnaturally making you better and therefore is cheating.
I'm a student in medical school. Say 10% of my peers were taking illegal performance enhancers that made their brains bigger, but there were side effects. I would find it infuriating if outside observers said "Who cares, they're doing it to themselves and it doesn't affect me personally." You know what else would really tick me off is if people said "Medical students have been cheating in school since time immmemorial so who cares."
My wife can't handle the show so I don't watch it often. She teaches 10 year olds and just can't handle the language of the kids. It kind of reminds me of the office in which I'm uncomfortable the whole time I'm watching the show but it still makes me laugh.
You make good points but if I was a patient I'd rather have the doctor whose brain was larger. I'm sorry for the side effects but the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
The Bull has only 1 option left (not that it matters).
Called up in July 2005, then sent back to Jacksonville for the Southern League playoffs. Option #1
Sent to Vegas after Spring Training 2006, then re-called for good after Lance Carter sucked big-time. Option #2
In all seriousness I'm with 613 on this. I just didn't see the point in finding who did what when. I firmly believe that if McGwire had broken Aarons record instead of Bonds the Mitchell report would never have been created.
I'm all for testing and going forward. Going backward is for the vindictive and it is pointless. JMO
Thanks! I missed when Broxton was sent down in 2005. I did a quick search of minor league stats and incorrectly assumed when he was called up 7/29 that he never went back down.
Thank you all,
Dodger fan in Hong Kong
Mr. ToyCannon, I'm glad you're all for testing. But the Mitchell report helps - not hurts - Bonds. And you sound like Mark McGwire got voted into the Hall isntead of falling way short.
He is no match for ManBearPig.
My philosophy is: There is a lifetime balance sheet for each person: On one side of the balance are angelic/right actions (non-cheating on exams, giving one's employer 8 full hours of work in an 8 hour work day, giving charity, playing baseball without illegal substances, etc). On the other side are evil/wrong actions (cheating on exams, skimming money off of public funds, using performance enhancing drugs, etc). IMHO no mortal being is completely angelic, just as no mortal being is completely evil.
The beginning motive to increase one's performance of angelic actions might be fear (of the law, or whatever) but eventually the motive becomes one of love and respect (for one's self).
I agree with those who say scapegoating the players listed in the Mitchell Report is unfair. The onus should be on those who remained silent. What's that famous Edmund Burke quote? "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
http://tinyurl.com/2ccn8k
If what Plaschke says is true, that management was unable to test players for drug use because of players' union rules, and if MLB management didn't take the union to task over that rule, then the onus for change falls on players union and MLB management.
That said, I wonder how much each team's owner/manager stressed to their players that drug use would not be tolerated.
If it was so obvious why no mention of it back then Bill?
Funny how he mentions an employee looking the other way when players were asking about steroids. Didn't he kind of do the same?
I wrote that sending Lo Duca out during the middle of a pennant race was one of the worst trades in team history. If DePodesta made the trade based on steroid use, then I stand corrected.
He only stands corrected if the trade was based on steroid use? How hard is it to see that, on its baseball merits alone, the LoDuca-Penny trade was easily a net positive for LA?
He is an idiot and it is best to ignore his existence.
It got him on television.
LA Times: Steroid investigation deeply implicates Los Angeles Dodgers
http://tinyurl.com/2szmng
And when Dodgers officials decided to trade Lo Duca, the report suggests, one of the reasons wasn't his own use of steroids, but the fact that he apparently had stopped taking them.
So, when various players and blog commenters get upset over the methods of investigation" etc., that they "think" are supposed to be legal, they have probably missed the point and purpose of the investigation. It isn't a trial, and never was. It is just preparation, for the real work. I do hope I have not overestimated the mind of Selig.
Glad to see no mention of Piazza or Beltre.
For many of those that chose health, their spot in MLB that would have been theirs had the playing field been level, wound up outside of baseball. It is not about the record book that drugs have altered, it is the careers that drug users have taken from too many non-drug taking players that is the sin.
WWSH
And so who are all these entirely blameless people? Judging from the Mitchell Report, the only clean player in the majors is Frank Thomas as he is the only player singled out as such.
Go Big Hurt!
In the absence of a testing regime, and with steroid use widespread, I must assume every org. saw their use (or rumors of their use) as another data point--sometimes good, sometimes bad. A lot of the material in the LAT material included notes on the negative sides of steroid use--i.e. increased risk of tendon/ligament injury. I haven't seen clear evidence yet that the Dodgers as an org. was actually directly facilitating their use, which would be a different matter altogether.
WWSH
Evidently your now being held accountable for things you don't say as well as the things you do say. Maybe you need to write a manifesto that describes your stand on every issue related to this witch hunt.
I've read several posts where intelligent posters have decried how sabremetric baseball fans have dismissed the Mitchel report and they can't understand why. Well right back at you pal. I can't understand why any intelligent human being can look at the Mitchel report and not smell a big rat.
Everyone wants to blame the players, owners, and media for looking the other way. Well who the heck were the people paying the money to watch those home runs fly out? Who was paying the money to see the new fleshed out closer storming the gates? Who turned the cheek when it was obvious what was going on? If the fans had stopped going when things got strange(Sosa/McGwire/Bonds) then I could understand some of this outrage but they didn't stop going, they kept going and the audience grew. To say they didn't know what was happening is bogus. They didn't what to know what was happening but home run records that stood for 40 years don't all the sudden get crushed without reasons. Were all to blame so I just don't get why the players need to be singled out.
The Era is over, move on or keep whining about how you feel cheated. The choice is yours.
Polite golf applause.
633
Polite golf silence.
You were probably joking, but why would Nomar get 15 games? He wasn't named anywhere in the report.
That's a bogus comparison, though. Doctors are responsible for the health, and sometimes, life or death of others. You can't say that about professional athletes.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.