Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
The irresponsible publication Thursday morning of names falsely linked to the Mitchell Report, in my view, is directly connected to the casual, all-in-good-fun passing along of rumors during the Hot Stove League.
A media culture that sets a standard of "someone else said it, so it doesn't matter if it's true" when the stakes are low is primed to have some of its members make the same mistake when the stakes are high. And so it went Thursday.
Dan Caesar of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch writes about it this morning, although you almost get the sense that he thinks it's only a TV-radio problem. Instead, it's pervasive.
Cheating the truth to grow your audience is wrong. (And it's not as if I haven't ever made the mistake.)
* * *
Mark Whicker of the Register takes the unpopular view regarding the Mitchell Report. I think it's worth a read, even if you don't agree.
* * *
Back to your regularly unscheduled Dodger news soon, I hope ...
Now that's an obscure ex-Dodger. Nice screen name. If that's your real name, I apologize for trivializing it.
Update to this post above.
OK, Dan Caesar said it.
The Mitchell Report has fallen into the hands of library catalogers:
http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/183713296
There's probably nothing to worry about: by Monday night we'll be talking about Juan Pierre just like the old days.
Is the father of the two brothers named Zebedee by any chance...?
I will use you as my guide to judge the feelings of the UCLA messageboards.
My initial guess is:
They hate all the candidates.
No this is in the Rocky Mountain News (Tracy Ringolsby)
Overheard
* Japanese right-hander Hiroki Kuroda canceled a scheduled visit to the United States because he decided to sign with the Dodgers. He also was being pursued by Seattle, Arizona and Kansas City. Dodgers closer Takashi Saito is believed to have helped sway Kuroda to Los Angeles.
I hate Bill Plaschke. Sour history? Are you freaking kidding me?
As I was reading off some of the names, a number of people in my office who had overheard me immediately gathered around my desk. In less than 60 seconds, more than a dozen people were standing nearby, excitedly chattering about the names on my computer. There was a warning on the WNBC site that said MLB sources were disputing some of the names on the list, and to my credit, I mentioned that. But nobody was really paying attention to that part. So, thanks to me, a lot of the people in my office, as well as the friend who called me, went most of the day thinking that Albert Pujols (among others) was officially a steroids cheat.
I'm a little bit embarrassed and upset about this. I spread defamatory lies about people simply because, well, I'm a gossip, and because WNBC gave me completely fabricated and uncorroborated information. I'm angry at myself, and I'm angry at WNBC.
WNBC has a one paragraph retraction and apology up on their website, but that's not good enough. Journalists only have an obligation to protect their sources so long as their sources are telling the truth. That list was given to WNBC either by a complete charlatan, or somebody with an axe to grind. Either way, that person is not deserving of WNBC's protection, and should be revealed as a public service, under the auspice of exposing purveyors of misinformation. This would give WNBC a chance to at least fix their lousy work with some good journalism. I'm not gonna hold my breath, though.
Hot stove rumors can be fun and engaging. Rumors like this, on the other hand, are damaging and hurtful. The rush to be first was more important than the obligation to be right. I'm just as guilty as WNBC in this regard, but then again, I don't hold the public trust of a news gathering organization.
This whole episode has left me feeling pretty lousy today. I'm going to turn this post into a letter and send it to WNBC. Hopefully that will make me feel better, but I doubt it.
Mostly its still hopeful since KD is gone.
I still suspect him. That's just me. You guys can rightly condemn me for speculating without solid evidence...
As for Lo Duca, I recall wondering about him, when he suddenly had that power surge...but I didn't think the transformation was quite as dramatic as Gagne's. Plus, I wanted to believe the feel-good story...
Are you trying to say that we're trading Matt Kemp to Iraq now?
Baseball needs to retain some measure of innocence for me to love this game. The next time someone like Gange comes along and does something extraordinary, we are less likely to be amazed and more likely to be wondering what he's taking.
I think our outrage would be better served on our fallen heroes rather than some internet rumors. I know it still took talent and drive to accomplish what they did, but I can't say I will ever think of Gagne or La Duca in the same way.
"The National Championship contest will be the fifth in program history for the Nittany Lions, as they also advanced in 1993, 1997, 1998 and 1999, clinching the title in 1999. Penn State improves to 53-25 in the NCAA Tournament and is one of two teams - with the other being the Cardinal[s] - to appear in every postseason event since its inception in 1981."
You're out of luck. Players do illegal stuff, a lot of them are jerks, and many/most play primarily for the money.
That's just the way it is. If you want saints and angels, look elsewhere.
It is obvious that you are probably right.
I hear there's a presidential race on right now.
But yet no offense alnyden (certainly not singling you out) I am nowhere close to being depressed to no end and I am huge fan of baseball. I have my Game Over shirt etc...
Actually, it looks to me like this is the POPULAR view. Once Clemens and Pettitte showed up, ESPN has been falling all over themselves to slam the report, its process, and the naming of names.
If there had been no Yankee stars, I imagine ESPN would be much less skeptical.
I'm not saying it's wrong to be skeptical. Just that it seems to be the popular way to go.
Marion Jones flatly denied drug use, until her recent mea culpa. Athletes like Clemens will continue to deny, knowing that they'll be able to hide behind the fact that they'll never be prosecuted and convicted.
Bob can educate you on the Tipster.
Maybe I should take a mini-vacation from DT until this blows over...
Now what exactly do they consider baseball's highest ideals?
1. Bored college kid makes a list based on what's already out there and sprinkles in some big names - notably Pujols but NOT A-Rod (remember, we're in NYC here).
2. Bored college kid calls up WNBC the morning of the release, claims to be a low-level employee of the Yankees/Mets and that he found a copy of the report.
3. WNBC, in a rush to beat everybody else to the punch, and only having 2-3 hours before the official release, jumps on the "insider info" without having an opportunity to verify anything.
Now, if that's the way it went, and you're WNBC, are you going to burn your source? No. Saying "Sorry, this is a huge story and we published libelious and flat out wrong information on the basis of a source that was previously unknown to us and turned out to be a complete and total fraud, but, hey, we're still a paragon of journalistic excellence!" is far far worse than just keeping mum and letting people think you were burned by a trustworthy source with an agenda, or even better, just having people forget it ever happened.
I could be wrong - maybe WNBC did have a truly trusted source that had given them good info in the past - but if it's anything like my speculation there will be no source-burning.
One name on the list that brought back old suspicions was Brady Anderson. What a flukey year he had in 96.
I think medicine is good. I think that drugs used to produce better than natural results are problematic, but that drugs used to preserve or restore natural ability are peachy.
Though throwing Darryl Kile on the list pretty much ensures his place in hell.
Since Stanford already has 50 NCAA championships, they can just make the L yellow for now!
What event was it being referenced in 38 ? There was no link
Also, what is the due process argument? This is not a trial or investigation conducted by the government, this is a private enterprise hiring private individuals to conduct an investigation.
I don't think the players (on orders from the union) refused to participate because of due process concerns. If that was the sole concern, they could have negotiated something to deal with these due process concerns. They did not because they were trying to protect themselves.
I've moved on to the acceptance stage. I am not happy about all this, but am at least now willing to figure out where we go from here.
Playing devil's advocate (or God's advicoate, I'm not sure which side I'm on)...
The key to the changeup is the difference from the speed of the fastball, with the same arm action. If HGH made Gagne's fastball faster, that would increase the difference between that and his changeup, making the changeup more devastating.
Is this going to be on TV? I want to watch!
What is "nittany" I wonder? A "nittany" lion sounds like a mother lion of some sort. I'll be back in a moment.
Cortisone - I have a special problem with as well: You're body is trying to tell you something by swelling up and refusing to move. Just perhaps you should listen to it.
Ok, I'm back.
Let's hear it for Penn State with the answers:
"...the word comes from a Native American term meaning, 'single mountain.'"
http://www.psu.edu/ur/about/nittany.html
And the state of American journalism sinks even lower.
What the fake list writer did was include every player who had already been implicated, plus added a few big names on his own. But the inclusion of the obscure guys like Crawford made it look more realistic.
Also allows for quicker recovery time from outings and injuries.
I agree. I find it very hard to discern what exactly is "wrong", "cheating" and so on in using one substance rather than another before such a substance is declared either illegal or against the rules. Once it's against the rules - whether the rules are really rational or not - OK, it's wrong to use the substance. But all these players being condemned for using HGH before it was declared out of bounds - I find that a bit hard to take.
What if it turns out that large amounts of Vitamin E aid athletic performance? Is it then wrong to take Vitamin E by injection (if that is possible, for the sake of argument)? How about eating large amounts of natural foods that contain Vitamin E? Would it be cheating to do either of these before MLB declared it improper? So where would you draw the line between that and a good diet? Where do you draw the line between taking HGH before it was declared off-limits and taking lots of vitamins? How about taking prescribed drugs helping recovery from Tommy John surgery?
For anyone who has ever had a cortisone shot it is not a pleasant experience. This is not really a shot as it is a sharp tube shoved into the appropiate area with the cream forcibly shoved into you. One must be in a lot of pain in the 1st place to subject themselves to such a procedure. At least that is how it has been explained to me.
Can't we have it all. I read about humans flying around with backpacks 40 some odd years ago. When are you brainiacs going to make some progress on that front. I'll be pretty ticked off if the day I die they finally get that thing off the ground so that those of us who can afford to, can fly one. The rest of you can eat cake.
Not that it will be any fun, since by that time the goverment would require that I wear a bubble suit so that I can't hurt myself and cause pain to those bystanders who get upset if my brain spills onto their boots.
also, there is a stuffed nittany lion, one of the last around iirc, in the lobby of the (yes) Paterno library on campus. Just fyi.
Cardinal.
It's not Cardinals.
The team is not named after a bird that does not inhabit California.
My head whips around for no man. Well, I did turn around to watch Bill and Chelsea Clinton after they passed by me in Manhattan a few years ago.
Plus, I wore pleated and cuffed corduroy trousers back in '98.
Is it then wrong to take Vitamin E by injection (if that is possible, for the sake of argument)? How about eating large amounts of natural foods that contain Vitamin E? Would it be cheating to do either of these before MLB declared it improper?
Yes. It would be cheating if declared improper.
So where would you draw the line between that and a good diet?
Tricky. Im not going to try to address a hypothetical like this. It would depend on what the research says. What are the risks and benefits? What is a normal level? I imagine it would probably be a moot point since the body can only absorb so much of a substance before homeostasis kicks in and the excess is excreted.
Where do you draw the line between taking HGH before it was declared off-limits and taking lots of vitamins? How about taking prescribed drugs helping recovery from Tommy John surgery?
See, here's why what was done was cheating.
Vitamins can be bought OTC. Prescribed drugs after TJ are kosher. A doctor puts his licence and livelihood at stake when he writes a script. Thing is, most of these HGH guys didn't have a prescription. They didn't go down the CVS and pick it up. They bought it mail-order from clubbie without a script. That's illegal, and that's why it's cheating.
....
37. Corduroy trousers
...
No. Steroids help you recover more quickly not only from workouts, but also from injuries. That's partly which doctors prescribe them.
And yet the state flag features an animal that does not inhabit California.
Ever?
But I'm still waiting for cardinals to make it past the Arizona desert. They don't seem to be able to get that far.
The California grizzly bear (Ursus arctos californicus[citation needed]) disappeared from the state of California in 1922 when the last one was shot in Tulare County, but it is still on the state flag of California. The bear is alluded to in the names of the sports teams of the University of California, Berkeley (the California Golden Bears), and of the University of California, Los Angeles (the UCLA Bruins) and in the mascot of University of California, Riverside (Scottie the Bear, dressed in a Highland kilt).
Also depending on who you believe, the Northern Cardinal does inhabit a small section of Southern California along the Colorado River.
http://tinyurl.com/3x4u62
The cardinal benefits from park-like urban habitats and the presence of bird feeders. However, it is listed as a species of special concern in California and may disappear there because of habitat loss.
1) It's like "The Grapes of Wrath."
2) Named after an extinct lake.
3) Has a bacteria (Francisella tularensis) and disease named after it (Tularemia).
4) Uhh... that's about it...
84, When you really need the cortisone, you basically don't even feel the shot.
All this talk makes me think of the old Denial, Anger, Acceptance comments. I don't even remember when that was--- I think when I first started reading Jon's blog.
The Audubon people drummed out of their society when I couldn't tell the difference between a crow and a raven.
Tulare, it's not just the e that isn't silent around here!
Seems like there will be a lot of players who are simultaneously relieved and yet also worried that they could be next if their source decides to talk.
http://m-w.com/dictionary/tulare
Nope, sorry, them thar's just Bigfeet :)
We have no idea how reliable this information may be. Some evidence, such as the shipments to Gagne at Dodger Stadium, seem pretty convincing. In other cases, however, we only have the word of an individual who claims to know what he is talking about.
Many players we think we "know" were taking steroids or HGH were not named. Again, the Mitchell group had a limited number of sources. Let's look at a hypothetical example. Let's say that player X began using when he was with Dodgers and established his drug connection here. If he later went to the Mets and kept his LA drug connection, the clubhouse attendant there would not necessarily have first hand knowledge of player X's usage. Thus when the clubhouse attendant spoke with Mitchell, his omission of player X would not mean that X was clean, only that he had no knowledge of his usage.
The problem with this kind of speculation is that it draws on unsupported inferences and tries to turn them into facts. If one believes that player X was using because "everyone says so" and he put up monster numbers, then it is easy to step over the line and believe that X managed to avoid getting named, but is guilty nonetheless.
We need to put all of this behind us and not worry about the past. Learn from it. Learn that the system can't and won't police itself. Institute serious testing for performance enhancing drugs and have a zero tolerance policy. If you get caught using steroids or HGH, you are out of the game. If we correct the problem on a go forward basis, we can forget the past with all of its shadows and whispers - and concentrate on baseball again.
There is a hard-hitting story there about how a guy ended up catching a tuna that wasn't nearly as big as he thought it was.
See, the Union Tribune is even running stories that are metaphorically about the Mitchell report.
The ageing player can't compete / the minor leaguer can't advance.
So...don't compete. Baseball is not oxygen. The human organism does not REQUIRE baseball. No one gives the accountant a break when he cooks the books because the poor thing was worried he couldn't be an accountant anymore.
You can't go back and change the stats or place aterisks.
It's not about stats, stat head. It's about one man taking unfair, secretive advantage of another.
The player stands to make a lot of money. And in baseball, stats are money.
Cheating is wrong children...unless the price is right. (And you get to be in a McDonald's commercial.)
Everyone's doing it.
Uh, no they're not. Which is why it's called cheating.
The drug hasn't even been proven to work.
It probably works. More importantly, it is the player's intent that it works. Which is an intent to cheat.
There are many unfair advantages in life.
Baseball is not life, it's sport a system of rules and parameters precisely set for humans to play within. So we can see how we measure up under equal circumstance.
Rules are for boy scouts, small potatoes really. They get broken.
Rules ARE the sport. Breaking the rules, is not playing the sport. It is doing something else.
I don't care.
You wouldn't.
I don't know who you would send the petition to but that judge does not sound like one who will budge.
Agreed. Which means George Mitchell now needs to go do a report that tries to identify every player who has ever gotten a hit when their back foot was outside the batter's box. And we need to expunge those players' stats from the record. Also any pitcher who has ever struck out a batter after taking longer than the rulebook-mandated 20 seconds between pitches. And next we crack down on Bobby Thomson's home run and all the other moments made possible by sign stealing.
And of course, we throw out the entire careers of Don Drysdale, Don Sutton, and Orel Hershiser, among others, because they are known to have doctored baseballs. And then we round up all the batters before the 1980s (when the rule was changed) who ever put pine tar too far up on their bat, and expunge their records too. And we strike all the hits that players have ever gotten while a teammate's number or other extraneous writing was handwritten on their caps, since that's against the rules. And of course, we go back and review video of every double play ever turned, to make sure the second baseman actually touched the bag.
We do all that and then maybe a few dozen other things, and then finally we'll have a record book that is free of the taint of cheating. A record book in which everyone has played exactly by the rules. That's what we want, right?
The difference between say Arnold circa 1975 and this guy, is what I'm talking about...
http://tinyurl.com/ytckmp
So if we're not entirely in favor of having every single player who used steroids to be executed after a show trial, we (the fans) are all complicit in the cheating.
The fans already are complicit in the cheating by not complaining about it while it occurred.
Multiple rule 4,5 and 8 violations make Curtis a dull boy.
Multiple rule 4,5 and 8 violations make Curtis a dull boy.
Other than staying home or turning off the TV how can a fan complain? I love the game far more than any of the players. I don't want to turn it off.
Personally, I would rather not know, but it's pretty clear that I'm in a distinct minority there. People want to know about what went on. The only way to do that is to have it out and clean the slate.
Baseball won't ever forget this, but we can put it behind us. We will forgive.
And over and over and over in an unceasing quest to have everything in the world be perfect.
But the world is imperfect. We are all imperfect.
Yep. Don't let the great be the enemy of the good, or even the marginally better.
Exactly. The steroids thing is something that baseball fans, by and large, don't care about. Or maybe they do care, but not enough to actually voice their displeasure by refusing to go to games or refusing to generate ad revenue by watching on TV.
The steroids scandal is almost entirely media driven, and it was created to pander to that segment of the public which craves salacious news about celebrities. The same types of people who made the O.J. trial a veritable religion, or who want to know whether Kevin Costner is cheating on his wife. The scandal was created, essentially, to appeal to the non-baseball fan segment of the public, the Entertainment Tonight crowd. Baseball fans just don't care -- at least not enough to stop giving their money to players so they can buy steroids.
Yes. It would be cheating if declared improper."
But not before it was declared improper, which was my point. As you yourself said, one paragraph up:
"If no rules/laws prohibit an act at the time it's committed, then legally it's not cheating."
here's an example of a guy not clean, as far as I can tell...
http://tinyurl.com/ywo63b
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.