Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Matt Patterson of The Oklahoman checked in with Dodger outfielder Matt Kemp in this interview:
Or, if you prefer passive voice ...
Dodger outfielder Matt Kemp was checked into by Matt Patterson of The Oklahoman in this interview:
Former Midwest City star Matt Kemp has packed a lot of life experience into his 23 years.
As a Bomber, Kemp helped Midwest City to a state championship in basketball, but he also saw two teammates, Shelden Williams and De'Angelo Alexander, investigated on charges of sexual assault. Kemp was also questioned by police as a witness. Charges were never filed, but it's an experience that sticks with Kemp to this day.
In his debut year with the Dodgers, Kemp hit .342 last season. He talks about life in LA, trade rumors and his feud with teammate Jeff Kent. Through it all, Kemp has called on his Oklahoma roots to stay grounded. ...
Kemp's "people are out to get you" philosophy, as expressed in the interview, is sad when you think about it - perhaps damaging in its own way somehow or indicative of damage already done - but perhaps also a pragmatic approach for him to have at this point in his life.
* * *
Hiroki Kuroda is getting a $7.3 million signing bonus for 2007 and then $5 million in salary for 2008, according to Tony Jackson of the Daily News. For the purposes of the recently updated payroll worksheet on the Dodger Thoughts sidebar, I'm putting the entire $12.3 million under 2008.
Jackson said Kuroda would get $10 million in 2009 and $13 million in 2010.
His outlook on the LA nightlife was a pleasant surprise as well. TMZ is no joke.
It's just our way of saying, "You're doing fine, Matthew Kemp... Matthew Kemp, mmmmkay!"
Favorite Chicago sports team: The Cubs. I'm a Dodgers fan, but if you're in Chicago, you have to support the Cubs.
I think it's really shameful the way the LA press has treated him. As someone once said, just because you are paranoid doesn't mean people aren't out to get you. I'm glad he seems to have enough perspective not to be too upset with the media or the vets like Kent.
Jon, if you ever wanted to torture me, you would write all your articles in the passive voice.
WWSH
I took out my DVD set of "The Honeymooners" and watched several episodes while baking.
My favorite bit remains, Ed Norton "addressing" the ball when showing Ralph how to start a golf swing.
"Helloooo ball"
it's okay, i can't resist them either.
Is the paranoia caused
1) directly by media coverage regardless of what Kemp does?
2) media coverage that is a result of other activities that Kemp does?
Or is it perhaps not really paranoia....
Plen'y of heart and plen'y of Matt.
Oklahoma, where the wind comes sweepin' down the plain!"
Huh.
I didn't know he could still walk, yet alone play. Still, I always liked him. They didn't have to give up much for him. Worth a shot, I guess.
An associate of mine was profiled in the Los Angeles Business Journal a few years ago. Among the things the editor allowed in the story was this:
"(Name) is generally unimpressive," said a source who asked not to be identified.
Virtually all the critical comments of Kemp are of that nature: Anonymous and insulting but unspecific.
If you were from Oklahoma, or parts nearby, you probably wouldn't ask that question.
If you were from Oklahoma, or parts nearby, you probably wouldn't be able to ask that question.
Why would any self-respecting Texan support an Oklahoman?
El Paso is in Texas, no matter what you say or where you are now.
And you root for UT.
http://tinyurl.com/2pegum
This little quote from Ken Gurnik kind of made me uneasy. Hopefully by spring training Nomar & La Roche will be the ONLY ones battling it out at 3rd base, besides Nomar will probably get hurt by mid-season.
Good things about Texas:
1) Austin
2) The border region
3) The Longhorns
4) San Antonio
5) Willie Nelson
The rest of the state, you can have.
I still include San Francisco and San Diego in California despite my desire to have both cities erased from the map.
DeAngelo I can understand. D'Angelo I can understand. But De'Angelo?
Question: let's say that when his page becomes available, someone were to sponsor it with this message: "This player does not exist. Look away."
Would that be accurate at that point? Will the Minotaur have to exist to pitch in the Major Leagues? What are the rules here?
As the Minotaur crosses into the Major Leagues, he also crosses into the realm of reality. Thus, through the crossing, the Minotaur carapace is shed and a real, live left handed pitcher is created.
Or at least, thats what the great book tells me.
If the Spartans would have lost because of that, I'd advocate refericide.
He becomes the great Savior of the Dodgers franchise and they have a thousand year reign of prosperity and world championships.
The killing of reference librarians? I'd make sure not to suggest that on The Griddle if I were you.
Bob'll be waiting. In his bath tub. With a shotgun.
The worst part is getting the bathtub and shotgun in my car to take it to work everyday.
Don't say I never did anything for ya.
http://tinyurl.com/36fjt5
Do I have to publish another long anti-San Francisco manifesto?
[Padres GM Kevin] Towers predicted a batting average of about .270 from Edmonds, 15-20 home runs and a .350 on-base percentage to go with better-than-average defense.
http://tinyurl.com/28lxew
The guy going to St. Louis is David Freese, a 3B who will be 25 next April, and has yet to advance beyond high A ball.
2004: 1.061
2005: .918
2006: .821
2007: .728
Houston, we have a pattern here.
I just checked Dodgers.com & nothing.
Just re-checked, got it.
Only in that he doesn't seem especially sincere.
The rug looks especially noticeable today!
So if Towers is right in 62 that Edmonds is going to OBP .350, he might be slugging right around .310. And that's a really high BB/XBH ratio. Towers may be a bit optimistic there.
There are three huge FA signings available next year - Sheets, Sanatana and Sabethia. Prior to this signing - and assuming Pierre is still on the team - we were likely to go into next year with a post-arbitration team salary of around $75M. Now that is $90M. At $75M landing one of those three should have been easy. Landing two would not be inconceivable (though admittedly very unlikely). At $90M getting one of them is considerably less likely. Additionally, even if we do land one next year, wouldn't signing Lowe to a 3 year extension be a much better use of the money given to Kuroda?
The Dodgers are on the cusp of being in the best possible of positions - a team that can support a high salary with a ton of youth talent allowing us to afford several legitimate superstars. Ned - as he has done with Pierre and now Kuroda - seems intent on squandering that advantage on overpaying for average talent (and it is only average when viewed in a very generous light), rather than using it to make us truly dominant.
The is a luxury tax, and for purposes of calculating salaries the bonus is spread over the life of the contract. In this case, the bonus of $7.3m is spread out $2.43m per year.
Thus, for luxury tax purposes, Kuroda's 2008 salary will be $7.43m ($5m + the bonus).
I'm picking up that vibe.
I'm not sure why.
Must buy financial services!
Must buy financial services!
Looks like he will wear #18. I guess Lucille II is truly gone!
Yes there is, at least of sorts. The Tax certainly makes it important to watch your total salary.
In Kuroda's case, the signing bonus is 2007 and thus will not count as part of the team's 2008 salary.
No one's watching the NCAA men's soccer championship game on ESPN? It's a good one so far. Ohio State just scored on Wake Forest, up 1-0 in the first. I guess if OSU wins, UCSB can't feel too bad, losing to the eventual champions.
I stand corrected. For luxury tax purposes, the salary (including signing bonus) is averaged over the life of the contract, so Kuroda's luxury tax number will be $11.77m in each of 2008-2010.
2008: $155m
2009: $162m
2010: $170m
2011: $178m
The tax rate applies to any payroll above the thresholds.
1st offense: 22.5%
2nd offense: 30%
3rd+ offense: 40%
Source:
http://www.mlb4u.com/wiki/index.php/Luxury_Tax
[free agent]
bills
penny
kuroda
mcdonald
(kershaw)
(elbert)
so why would we need two free agent starters in '09? even one might not be necessary, depending on how kershaw and mcdonald perform this year, if they're called up by the end of the season.
I think it is purely (non-baseball) tax related.
The one thing that counts in 2007 is the buyout of contracts. For instance, Lieberthal made $1.15m in salary last season and the Dodgers bought out his 2008 option for $100k. His 2007 salary, for luxury tax purposes, is $1.25m.
I've always counted buyouts in the next year's salary figures. Maybe I need to change my thinking. Then again, we aren't anywhere near the luxury tax threshold, so who knows?
And, just a thought, an excuse we are likely to hear re: the Mitchell report:
yes, I tried it once, but did not circulate
There is nothing good about this signing except that for 2008 we have some additional depth.
"I did not inject"
the timing of salary payments may have some bearing on the structuring of contracts, but if they hire Jeter's CPA, it's all non taxable to the state anyway
2006: $3.6m
2007: $4.1m
2008: $4.5m option ($1m buyout)
When the Dodgers released Tomko last summer, they ensured his buyout. Factoring in the pro-rated minimum salary Tomko earned while with San Diego (roughly $70,000), Tomko's Dodger salaries are as follows:
2006: $3.6m
2007: $4.03m
buyout: $1m
The total is $8.63m, which for luxury tax purposes is split evenly over the two guaranteed years of the contract, or $4.315m in each of 2006 & 2007.
Even in the best possible of worlds for the Dodgers, nothing good will come out of the Kuroda signing.
I would guess that, at most, two of Sheets, Santana or Sabathia will be available via free agency next offseason, and it wouldn't surprise me to see all three signed to long-term deals before the 2008 is done.
I understand your point though.
and i'd be fine with signing a superstar, but why would we need three of them? otherwise, what's the farm system for? if the kids are gonna be anywhere near as good as they project to be, yeah i'd rather see kershaw than ben sheets.
if we are able to dump kuroda and sign two superstars in '09 that's fine too, but if you've got good players at certain positions, then your dollars are best spent somewhere else where the marginal utility might be higher. like maybe the outfield.
Might the reason be that Sheets, Sabathia, or Santana may want $20M, $25M, $25M a year for multiple years be the reason? Isn't it possible that some GM's do not find it wise to give out 9 figure contracts to pitchers?
Why would you want him there instead of Lowe?
Might the reason be that Lowe's contract is up after 2008, and he may not want to be back with the Dodgers? Is it out of the question that Kuroda out-performs Lowe in years 2009 & 2010?
There is nothing good about this signing except that for 2008 we have some additional depth.
And all along I thought the number one reason to be happy about this signing was there was no longer a need to trade youth for starting pitching.
The Dolphins are going to make the 1976 Bucs open up their bottles of champagne if they make their field goal.
Yeah, in the last thread I even commented on it during the game.
I suspect Santana might be traded, and signed to an extension by the new team (Yankees?).
Also, Cleveland is at $48.1m pre-arbitration in 2009 and can probably afford to extend Sabathia soon at a less than market rate.
Not sure of the Brewers' payroll going forward, but Sheets is the most likely to be a FA.
Understood that when he first signed with the Dodgers he was not highly rated, had little market value, etc. What kind of contract did he have to sign, and why can't he revert to FA? His only options seem to be to hope that general decency on the part of the Dodgers gets him a better salary next year, or go home to Japan. (Presumably, he could actually get a much better salary in Japan now than he had there two years ago.)
Most of all, where does the 1 year contract come into play? Name a free agent pitcher as good or better then Kuroda that would sign a 1 year deal? They are not out there.
I'd say Lieber or Wolf, but both have legit injury concerns and are not appreciably better than Kuroda projects to be. At the least, they carry a different level of risk than Kuroda.
I believe that underneath the snow, there is some substance that is nominally green.
I really want the Dolphins to lose. Come on, Ravens.
The better known Japanese players (the Matsuis, Ichiro, and Iguchi) had free agency provisions written into their contracts. I would imagine that Kuroda has a similar deal.
I don't think anyone wants to be the team that Miami beats this year.
It wasn't the minor league deal that keeps Saito chained (for lack of a better word) to the Dodgers.
Akinori Otsuka was posted and signed with the Padres in November 2003, and signed a 3-year contract through 2006, covering his "team controlled" years. Otsuka is/was still subject to arbitration from 2007-2009 (Texas non-tendered Otsuka this week; any team that signs him to a one-year deal would retain arbitration rights for 2009).
Saito's relatively low salary is simply due to the lack of interest in him when he first came over, as overkill said. We just don't notice these contract issues with Ichiro & Kideki Matsui because their contracts were so large to begin with.
We're incredibly lucky to have Saito. Eventually, he'll start wearing down, or worse, will injure himself, and Broxton will become the closer (we're lucky there too). At that point, we'll need someone good as set-up reliever (is that what Meloan is being groomed for?)
Rich Gannon just added a syllable to "ath-a-let-ic".
A lot of teams would just give up after losing their first four or five games in the 1920s and 1930s.
*to the notion that people back then...
Thats why the Kuroda Accord was created.
Usually they gave up because they ran out of money to pay players.
Really, is this replacement value just your opinion, or do you have more concrete evidence of this?
http://www.nfl.com/history/standings/1924
Or even 1921:
http://www.nfl.com/history/standings/1921
The Tonawanda Kardex were a disgrace!
DLS.
I have always assumed there were undefeated seasons in the pre-Super Bowl era, specifically the 1920s to 1940s, but apparently that is not the case.
The Chicago Bears are the only other team to have an undefeated, untied regular season, and they did it twice, 1934 & 1942, but lost both championship games. The 1942 14-6 loss to the Redskins was especially tough, as it was revenge for the Bears' 73-0 shellacking of the Skins in the 1940 championship game.
That's it.
A chest bump.
They then missed the 35 yard extra point. So Centennial drives down the field with a chance to win by a point. Luckily, DLS held on fourth down. But it was a total garbage call, and that ref is an idiot.
At the time, it looks like the NFL didn't count the ties at all in winning percentage. They do now and they count as a 1/2 win and 1/2 loss.
In Japanese baseball, ties are not counted in winning percentage at all. All they do is lower the denominator for winning percentage.
This is essentially a home game for Wake as it's in Cary, North Carolina.
Heck, I've had a teammate DQed for inappropriate underwear before.
There are other stats then K/9 to evaluate a pitcher.
Houlton also threw 129 innings in 05 giving up 21 jacks with a 5.10 ERA. The LA Dodgers are not using DJ Houlton as a 5.
You want to pretend (like BTF) that his sub-2 ERA in Japan is going to translate well when his peripherals don't support it, then feel free to keep believing. We'll see soon enough.
----
Man, this game is exciting!
Paul, do you have a source for league strikeout information? I only ask because I wonder if strikeouts are down in general in Japan in relation to MLB simply due to the style of play. I have tried unsuccessfully to find league-wide information to which to compare Kuroda.
Kuroda was 10th in the Central League in total strikeouts, FWIW.
Thanks.
If that's not domination, it's awfully close! No?
What I did say is that a three-year, expensive deal to Kuroda was a mistake. there are better options available, ranging from doing nothing to signing someone like Wolf to looking to bringing up some folks from our minor leagues, than signing Kurado who, again, seems likely to me to be a slightly above replacement level starter with a decent chance of being a bust.
I only would have anecdotal evidence, but the Japanese games I've seen have never featured a lot of strikeouts. The pitchers in general don't throw very hard and are usually loath to challenge a hitter when ahead in the count.
Typical Japanese baseball pitch sequence:
Pitch 1 - Strike (called)
Pitch 2 - Strike (foul)
Pitch 3 - Ball
Pitch 4 - Ball
Pitch 5 - Foul
Pitch 6 - Foul
Pitch 7 - Ball
Pitch 8 - Foul
Pitch 9 - Foul
Pitch 10 - Foul
Pitch 11 - "Do they sell anything in the stands that isn't beer?"
By the way, aren't some of those stats I cite called peripherals? Are they not at least included in them?
Look, I have no idea how Kuroda will turn out. For all I know, he could be a bust. I trust Logan White's judgement.
But, just because I don't know how he will turn out, doesn't mean someone else does.
The American hitters ability to take almost any pitch in the zone out of the park means these guys have to start nibbling a lot more.
ZIPS pessimistic projection is 92 ERA+ with an optimistic of 136 ERA+. Those don't fall in line with your "barely" above replacement level view.
CHONE has Kuroda at 3.97era 179IP in a neutral setting with a 3.27 at Petco.
Also, all this talk of theoretically picking up all 3 stud pitchers next off season is laughable.
Santana is going to be traded and signed to an extension. Sheets hasn't been healthy and really good since like 2004. So that leaves one in Sabathia.
The Japanese won the WBC in part because of the format. They only needed to win two games in the first round when playing at home and they easily beat Taiwan and China, but lost to Korea.
In the second round, they should have beaten the USA (who played very poorly) but got jobbed, then they lost to Korea, but beat Mexico and then advanced when the US lost to Mexico.
In the semis, instead of having the top two teams in each pool crossover to play each other, they were matched up again, so Japan played Korea a third time and Korea couldn't pull off another upset. Korea really didn't have a lot of good hitters. The Koreans got by on pitching and defense and finally lost when one of the pitchers, (Byung-Hyun Kim) had a meltdown.
Japan then drew Cuba in the final and the Cuban pitchers couldn't find home plate in the first inning and pitched themselves out of the title.
When the USA beat Japan, the US pitched Jake Peavy, Scot Shields, Todd Jones, Brian Fuentes, and Brad Lidge.
Right now, legitimately contesting for the 4 and 5 spots, the Dodgers have Kou, Schmidt, Loaiza and Meloan - plus a hand full (McDonald and Kershaw among them) that we could draw on from the minors.
If the only options are standing pat or a 3/37 deal to Kuroda, then I think we should just stick with what we have. Again, if the crop of FA pitchers coming after 2008 were not so stacked, I might feel differently.
I understand that but all this pessimism based on statistics needs to be countered. You guys are pessimistic, I understand that, but even statistically inclined projection programs don't even predict the doom and gloom some here see in Kuroda.
Also, this is where scouting come into play. Japanese ball has always been traditionally different than Major League ball. The focus on fundamentals and contact hitting is superior over there. Maybe the Dodger scouts believe Kuroda's stuff is superior enough to succeed over here.
I just don't think its as black and white as some here see. Oh, bad k rate, he is going to be bad. Oh, homerun rate is going to be high, that's going to sky rocket. etc etc etc.
Great game. Heartbreaker for OSU.
didn't kuroda also play in a smallish hitter's park?
4.22 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, 187 IP, 143 K's, 14-11 W-L
Again, the landscape is so hard to predict a year from now. It looks stacked now but what if Sheets continues his trend of being injured and the probably trade (and extension) of Santana.
2008 offseason is not as stacked anymore.
Are you talking to yourself?
Fielding in Japan isn't very good either.
But man do they love their contact hitting! Unless you're a gaijin brought over to play. In that case, you can hack to your heart's content.
Being a Boras client, a 4-5 year 13mil annually for Lowe's 36-40 seasons is a better way to spend the money?
I can't agree with that.
And yet you seem to indicate that Colletti/McCourt would be willing to dole out a 9-figure contract, and you seemed to even advocate doing 2 of them, when it is quite possible (very likely in fact) they would do nothing of the sort!
Kershaw, Elbert & McDonald more then likely are not ready until 2009 or later. Lowe, more then likely will not be brought back, and Kuroda is a reasonable stop-gap to the youngsters. I seriously doubt the Dodgers land "any" of the 3 you mention in Santana, Sabathia or Sheets.
I agree that if we'd have to go beyond two years, we should look elsewhere.
I do believe Kuroda will be one our 5 best starting pitchers based on the parameters I laid out in the Kuroda Accord.
I would not extend Lowe. His (Boras) demands would be no where close to what I would offer.
Everyone was bashing the 4 yr deal he got from us saying there is no way in hell he will be worth it for all 4 years.
Fast forward three years, you guys want to gamble again and see if he could be worth it for all 8 years?
With Lowe, if his 2008 is successful, I think you just have to walk away with your winnings.
Lowe will be in a drastically different situation than Jones was this year.
Lowe is at the end of his career and probably wants that last long term deal for financial security. Jones had the luxury of "only" being 30 and thus, giving him more time to rebound to secure that long term deal.
I can't see Lowe only getting 2 years unless he doesn't feel like pitching anymore.
If it gives the opportunity for a worse player to be ensured of a job.
If it prevents you from doing something else you'd rather do. We're not on the hook for anything except Pierre (and Kuroda, who doesn't exist here) in 2010 plus arbitration payments. What's the harm?
I don't think Ned is in the upper echelon of GM's either but the Kuroda signing shouldn't be evidence for that.
Kuroda, at the most, takes up maybe 10% of the payroll. For a large market team like the Dodgers, he isn't shouldn't be a hindrance if they want to acquire a upper tier player.
Then the idea of even entertaining a Lowe extension is kind of fairy tale-ish when you consider the circumstances that will surround his on-coming free agency.
Dodgers are in a excellent position, and Ned does the most to mess it up---Loazia, Nomar, Kuroda, Pierre.
Paying any type of signifcant cash for someone that has no upside to be great, is a mistake.
If the Dodgers need depth, they should use their farm system. Thats what it is there for.
This is no different than the Giants signing Matt Morris, the Tigers trading for Sean Casey, or Ned signing Juan Pierre. Costly PVL, road blocks for the kids, and investing money into player with little upside.
Pitching Kuroda instead of James McDonald/Orenduff/Houlton/Loaiza will result in exactly what advantage this year?
How valuable with Kuroda be in 2009, 2010 in his 34/35 yrs at 12+ mils a pop.
(picks up guitar)
Well, here I agree with you, but I think he's doing a good job (for Ned) this offseason.
However, I don't think "not" giving a pitcher a 9-figure contract is stupid. I actually agree with it. Again, only 3 have ever been given one. Hampton, Brown and Zito.
One could argue the "peripherals" on giving a pitcher a 9-figure deal do not look good! LOL!
I happen to believe Kuroda is a better option then the 1 year deals for a Lieber/Wolf type. I would not have minded if they stood pat, but that didn't appear to be an option. Not for Ned anyway.
I'd be as against signing another starting pitcher to a large contract as you seem to be with the Kuroda signing.
And I understand the "but these guys are different" argument. I just see it as everyone is different, until they get the money.....
Why not signing neither, and letting either the high end youngsters, or a Sabathia, Santana, Sheets pitch?
Or adding a quality player to the offense with the money--
I guess the difference in opinion here is about projection. Some of us think we signed a Kyle Lohse/Matt Morris, while others believe we signed another Saito/DiceK.
I don't see his contract as being any sort of hindrance in the upcoming years. Kent, Furcal, and Lowe come off the books after this year, freeing up about $31M to fill in whatever supposed holes we will have. Jones comes off the books after 2009, freeing up another $18M.
As of now, it doesn't seem that we have any long-term holes, but it's inevitable that some of the youngsters won't pan out (whether it be Abreu, Hu, or some of the pitchers). We should still have plenty of money to spend on free agents to fill in whatever holes we'll have.
Note that I do think he's better than Loaiza and he helps us in 2008.
The problem is that the sample size of pitchers coming from Japan makes any projection problematic. And if you're going to cite stats, you can't ignore the fact that all the projection systems, which have tried to take these sorts of issues into play, have been more positive than the pessimistic folks around here. I must assume the people who do ZIPS also know about the K/rate issue. And sure, you can cite Igawa, but again, sample size problems come into play. I'm not saying it's guaranteed Kuroda will do well, but there seems to be the belief that he's probably going to be awful. That I disagree with.
As for scouting reports, I don't see how that supports the pessimistic projections. White scouted Kuroda, and BPro's scouting report saw him as better than junk.
WWSH
LaRoche
Ethier
Kershaw
Mcdonald.
Thank you Mr.Kuroda! The kids are still here!
We have confidence that during this upcoming season 2008, that you will perform to the standards of the average #3 starter in the NL this past season, 2007.
1) The Dodgers more then likely will not give any pitcher the kind of money the big 3 for 2008 will command. Like it or not, that's probably a given, (and one I agree with).
2) Youngsters like Kershaw, Elbert, McDonald will not be ready until 2009 at the earliest.
3) The current GM felt a need to acquire some starting pitching depth as insurance to Schmidt & Loiaza, and didn't feel injured starters like Wolf or Lieber made sense in that scenario.
If we accept those 3 premises, what move makes more sense then signing Kuroda? Standing pat doesn't count (though I agree with it) if you accpet #3 above.
1. On the scouting said (and from stat-heavy Baseball Prospectus no-less):
He's not Daisuke Matsuzaka, but Kuroda a very strong power pitcher with a low to mid-90s fastball and a wicked forkball. In addition, he features a plus shuuto, something like a screwball, as well as an effective change. Even if he only pans out as a third or fourth starter in the majors, he will give you innings, work deep into games, and he should be fairly consistent start to start.
Sounds like big-league stuff to me. And White has signed off on him.
2. On the stat side, all the projection systems that use stats seem to believe he won't stink.
Because ZIPS bombed on Igawa, does that mean the system is completely useless? I'm sure one can find plenty of other American players ZIPS fouled up on; does that mean we completely discard it? Of course, not. There's always uncertainty in projection, and even more so with Japanese pitchers, but we do our best with the information we have. Scouting seems to see Kuroda as alright/projection seems to think he's fine/ergo, I think there's a good chance he won't stink.
WWSH
I think you are right, and thats one of the problems with Dodger mgt that is illustrated by the Kuroda/Loaiza signings.
They wont pay top dollar for the true difference making stars (like A-Rod), but they will instead spread that money around as "depth". With the Dodger farm system, it should allow the team to go after the superstars and get the depth from the minor leagues.
We can address that issue when big stars actually hit the market.
WWSH
But, is that necessarily the best way to go? I don't happen to agree with giving out huge dollars for multiple years to pitchers. It puts too many eggs into one basket, and causes too many problems down the road, unless you have "yankee" money.
At this point, I'd rather the Dodgers get their depth from signings like Kuroda, and get the superstars from their minor league system.
Which is why I included a scouting report. And the fact that White has also scouted him.
WWSH
No, he did not.
He was not even assistant GM when we got most of those players.
Who knows about Loaiza.
first half: 119.2IP 3.84 ERA
second half: 85IP 5.19
Sept/Oct: 7.62 era
He pitched over 200 innings in a 5 man rotation. It seems to me, Dice-K just tired out there during the end of the season.
The Dodgers are not going to ask Kuroda to be a rotation anchor and pitch 200+ inings like Dice K.
I also think ZIPS takes into account the mlb seasons of Igawa and Dice-K. It isn't a static system. After one more year of statistics and taking everything into account, it still believes Kuroda will do decently.
Maybe its just stubborn...like Ned with Pierre.
ZIPS: Japanese SPs; Colletti: Pierre
????
Did White actually scout all of them? What's the evidence of this? When head of amateur scouting, I assume White was spending all his time looking at college and HS players? Wasn't his promotion then to head of player development? Unless I see a press report indicating otherwise (as with Kuroda), I don't think it's necessarily true that White specifically scouted all those players you listed.
WWSH
But its easier to project a minor leaguer becoming at the very least depth, rather than a minor leaguer becoming a superstar.
251 All the ones that are based on a small amount of innings thrown when he was hurt.
Don't tempt me to root against the Dodgers.
I think PECOTA does a much better job with Japanese pitchers, I'd like to see what it thinks.
That's the trouble with scouting, right? Well, I guess we'll just have to hope the Dodgers staff knows what it's doing.
WWSH
We don't know that. You are just assuming that. No where has it been publicized that White said to acquire those players.
What we do know is that White did go to Japan and did scout Kuroda extensively.
Kuroda at say a 4.40 ERA, is just another guy.
The impact is minimal IMO, and for 12mil bucks just isnt smart managing.
I agree with that.
is kuroda the best use of $12 million/year?
probably not.
will kuroda's performance be worth $12 million/year?
maybe, maybe not.
will it be worth a good chunk of $12 million per?
probably.
will it be worth none of it, or close to none?
pretty unlikely.
ergo, i'm not outraged.
1/ he was extensively scouted by our Japanese scout over three years anticipating his coming to America
2/ Logan personally scouted him this summer. Logan's strength is pitcher evaluation.
3/ He seems to have multiple pitches and sufficient velocity...good for a starter.
4/ Cost us nothing but $$$, not even a draft pick. I'd like to think we overpaid for him because he's a known quantity to us.
The only risk is if he's a slow worker who loses control of the strike zone and his mind(read Ishii, but to be fair, a certain Jim Tracy might have pushed him into Syd Barrett land)
I'd be more into things like old fashioned scouting, walk rates, fly ball/ground balls rates, k rates...
Before returning to the Dodgers for a 2nd stint?
Are there any similarities between Nomo & Kuroda?
This is the first time Gurnick mentioned Pierre as a trade candidate!
Things I am not clamoring for: Scott Rolen
Who are you pulling for in the coaching search?
Sadly, I don't think anyone is going to buy me a sextant this Christmas. I've been clamoring for that since Friday.
The people of St. Louis are clamoring for Scott Rolen to get out of town.
1a. Mooch
1b. Leach (out of ? :( )
2. Chow
If you had Brian Westbrook on your fantasy football team, you are clamoring for him to not take a dive at the 1 foot line and just score the TD.
I think it is Chow or Walker.
I really wanted Leach, but that is not going to happen.
Not that I have a Christmas tree in my place.
I really need to know what latitude I'm on at all times.
I wish it was Leach, but it's not going to be. JIM Harbaugh would be cool, but I'll believe it when I see it. I have made peace with the impending disappointment. I just hope we win football games. Chow, Walker, Neuheisel, whatever. I just want to have a good team.
He is not a happy go lucky kind of guy. He has spent a good chunk of his adult life covering the Dodgers. He's likely transcended liking or disliking the team.
"So, Coach Chow, how would you describe Vince Young's effort today."
"coo, coo, cooooo, cooo."
"Excuse me?"
"COO, COO, COOOO, COOO."
"Don't you mean coo, coooooooo, coooo?"
"cooooooo, cooooooooooooooooo!!!!"
As far as their rationale, I think they would argue that four wrongs don't make a right.
Regfairfield and I are guarded about this signing. JoeyP and Paul Scott are against it. Am I missing any other negative reaction? I think the pro-Kuroda people have had more than a majority.
But I appreciate the comment.
And this place wouldn't be the same without all the diverse views.
The embodiment of cynicism and skepticism himself: D4P
The Dodgers will not extend Lowe, but, they should extend Penny (based upon a quality 2008) at something like $15-18M per year for 3 more years after 2009.
2009:
Penny
Bills
Kuroda
Schmidt
Kershaw/McDonald/Elbert
Any old baseball fan who has been paying attention the last few years knows Scott Rolen has a bum shoulder.
I stand by my rather radical stance, that an organization should try to develop pitching, while supplementing its offense with free agents if necessary. This has relation to moneyball in taking advantage of economic inequities ocurring presently in baseball. Guaranteed long contracts are ridiculous, but much more so with pitchers who are more vulnerable to injuries that steal years or even careers. Maybe this is why I am somewhat unhappy with Kuroda's three year contract.
I'm just naturally atrocious at spelling,(being constantly berated by an aunt who was a librarian) so this post drove me to the dictionary, and probably isn't perfect.
Who Knows? Who Cares?
Look at the the Schmidt and Zito contracts. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't, but it is a bad gamble.
Sounds like too much work. I think my next pie will just be all berries. And I can use my mortar and pestle for the first time to smush them!
But I've asked for baking equipment for Christmas, so who knows!
When it comes to young players, Colletti essentially discounts their minor league performance and insists on "proof" that they can perform at the major league level before even allowing them a shot at being a starter, much less giving them a long-term, expensive contract.
But give him a guy from Japan who's never played in the majors or the minors, and make him 33 years old, and all of a sudden Ned thinks the guy has proven himself worthy of a big contract and a spot in the starting rotation.
Is the Japan league that much more competitive than our minor leagues? Or is being relatively old and still playing "proof" that you deserve a big contract?
I dig it Marty. ;o)
yes, two far. take that.
Not rushing pitchers who aren't ready.
Not inserting pitchers into roles they can't successfully fill.
The reports on Kuroda suggest that in 2008, he will be better than any of those four. I'm not even sure why Houlton or Orenduff get into the conversation. And Loiza is already in the rotation unless Schmidt recovers.
Other than as a kind of intellectual game, I don't understand the priority given to spending the least amount possible. The Dodgers are not the Florida Marlins. Los Angeles is not Milwaukee. The attendance here is close to 4 million/year. They are in the second or third biggest market in the country. They're in a competitive division as well as a competitive market for fan attention. Dodger fans are strikingly loyal. Should fans feel bad for not wanting the team to send DJ Houlton out there as a key component in a pennant race if there is someone potentially better available? If you're going to overpay for anything in this game, it's pitching. If you're going to spend money on depth/redundancy in any aspect of the game, it's pitching. None of our real pitching prospects are "blocked" by Kuroda, because none of them should be forced into starting roles until '09, at which point a slot or two will surely be open.
Ned's made a few bad deals, but the only argument against this one would be if it's the last $35 million in his budget. It's not, so I don't think it's even relevant to the analysis.
John, I suppose my comments was based more on comments made throughout the past few days, not just in this post. I'm sorry If I'm misguided in my assessment.
Perhaps its my statistical naiveté, but I can't help but be very excited about the Kuroda signing. He's a talented pitcher coming out of a hitter's park into a pitcher's palace and he has been scouted extensively by the Dodgers.
If he fails (whatever that exactly means), I think it might speak more to our scouting department as opposed to him as a pitcher.
I'm just of the opinion that I'd rather take 12 mil and put it into him as opposed take flyers on retreads like Lohse and Silva- since it would seem that Elbert, MacDonald and Minotaur will not arrive just yet.
(By the way, does anyone feel a little special when John himself responds to your post.... I'm still saving a spot for Bob on my dance card as well.)
You are more likely to curry Jon's favor if you spell his name correctly.
I'm just sitting here WAITING for the next possibility of catcher's interference...
Eeeek....My apologies to Jon.
The articles I've found are either too complex for me (from a math standpoint) or too simplistic (sort of like "Gee, aren't those Japanese fans wacky?").
I can give my impressions (even though I'm a librarian, and not Fred Travelena):
1. Japanese pitchers, with a few notable exceptions, do not aggressively attack the strike zone. They prefer to let the hitters get themselves out. This leads to long at bats, lots of foul balls, and extremely long games.
2. Most of the Japanese ballparks are comparable in size to U.S. parks with Hiroshima being a noticeable exception. And that stadium is likely on its way out. However, there are a lot of domed stadiums in Japan. And in nearly every domed stadium in Japan, the ball carries very well. In the outdoor stadiums, scoring is usually lowered.
3. The stadiums almost all have symmetrical dimensions. And they have few if any odd corners. This helps to keep the number of triples down.
4. Japanese baserunners are very hesitant to take an extra base and force a throw from an outfielder.
5. Nearly every Japanese team, even ones that hit lots of home runs, will sacrifice a lot. It really doesn't matter who. They just do it. It's the thing to do.
6. The ace pitchers on each team, and few teams have more than one, usually throw a lot of pitches and stay out for a long time. In every other instance, the manager will pull a pitcher at the slightest bit of trouble and go lefty-righty from the 5th inning on.
7. The baseball in Japan has a different cover on it and pitchers coming to the U.S. have to adjust how it breaks, but this is not considered a big issue. Japanese baseballs tend to travel farther when hit.
8. The Japanese don't field as well as you would expect for teams that take full infield practices before each game and likely go through it hundreds of times in spring training (which starts in January.)
9. Foreign players brought over to Japan as hitters almost always have horrible strike zone judgment and have terrible K/BB ratios. Teams don't mind this as long as the guy hits home runs.
10. Although there is a lot of sacrificing, base stealing isn't as popular.
I've opted to stop at Moses length and not go for the Woodrow Wilson.
I couldn't disagree with that, but I would think a scout would know better.
I read "Moneyball" right after it came out and read the whole thing on a flight to Japan. I then gave a book to some friends in Tokyo.
I saw a game in the 2004 China World Series. I honestly think a AA team could have beaten either of them. There were probably 500 people at the game and it was free. No tickets, just walk in. China has a long way to go baseball wise.
Can anybody make a pizza place recommendation that's likely to deliver?
China, as in PRC, or Taiwan, as in ROC?
The best team in Taiwan could hold its own in AA. The best team in China would probably lose to most good college teams.
I believe the Yankees were the first team to start putting a lot of money into China. They signed a couple of Chinese players.
Most of the coaches in China are from Taiwan.
yeah, you can make the arguement that ned shouldn't have been thinking to pick either of those options, but the fact is, he was going get another pitcher, bottom line.
I think our pitching will be much better in 2008 mostly because Billingsley will start a full season.
But, I also think Kuroda & Loaiza will be better than Tomko & Hendrickson (can they be worse?), with Schmidt a good bet to outperform his 6 starts of 2007.
If our starters are Bills, Lowe, Penny, Kuroda, and Schmidt plus in the pen Saito (6), Broxton (7), Beimel (8), Proctor (9) and Loaiza (10) that leaves 2 spots for Meloan, Brazoban, Houlton, Hull, Kuo, McDonald, etc.
Can all of these guys be sent to Vegas? It should be an interesting Spring.
It's SOP for the American managers in Japan to bring interpreters out to the mound or to argue with umpires.
I should mention that Japanese umpires aren't very good and they let managers argue with them for a very long time and rarely eject anyone.
All of Meloan, Brazoban, Houlton, Hull, Kuo, Stults, and McDonald have option years remaining.
That's a given. I don't believe most English profanities have Japanese equivalents.
I thought September call-ups don't count toward an option year as long as the player isn't sent back down?
Kuo was added to the 40-man when he was called up on 9/2/05, and spent the rest of the season the the big club. I have his option years used as 2006 & 2007.
But it's more fun to argue through an interpeter!
http://tinyurl.com/2qsk8p
Note that no one else is still on the team.
You are right. The Dodgers sent Kuo to A outright in June 2004, removing him from the 40-man. Since he was in the minors on the 40-man up to that point in 2004, 2004 counts as an option year.
So Kuo's option years used are 2004, 2006 & 2007.
I thought September call-ups don't count toward an option year as long as the player isn't sent back down?
That would seem to make sense. If it were not true I would expect to see far fewer September call-ups. Why waste an option year to allow a young guy to play a few major league innings?
Nice pull!
In the long run, they were better off cranking up the Aerosmith on their tinny IROC Camaro sound systems.
I totally aggree with that. Muller, and Schmidt's names jump out first for me.
>> Kemp was also questioned by police as a witness. <<
The article we discussed here this summer had left the impression that he might have been a participant (at least as I remember it) so I hope this discription of him as a possible witness is the more accurate one.
## Jeff had said some things. Everyone was frustrated. We were losing and we weren't going to the playoffs. It was a team thing. It's unfortunate the papers got hold of some stuff and blew a little thing out of proportion. That's what papers do sometimes, but we settled it. ##
I'm kind of interested to know how we settled it. Does this mean that Joe Torre's job is already done?
Agree that a side benefit is none of the good young players were dealt for a starting pitcher.
Someone wrote that Kurod will be moving to a pitchers palace. Not sure that's the case. Seems to me, Dodger Stadium is nuetral and a pretty good place to hit HRs. Maybe it's a better pitchers park than Kuroda's home park in Japan. I just wonder if he'll miss enough bats.
http://tinyurl.com/2vtzl8
For those who could care less, pardon the interruption and we now return you to our regularly scheduled programming.
And, by the way, he was also offered a longer contract by the Dodgers.
I also tend to believe "we settled it" is a good enough end of it.
Andrew, I just sent you an email.
Logan White, the assistant general manager who made his name through talent evaluation, saw enough tape of Kuroda and watched him in person enough to give the thumbs up.
"I put my reputation on the guy," said White. "He's legit."
Here's White's scouting report:
"He has a very good delivery, an easy arm motion. He throws from a three-quarters angle. He runs his fastball anywhere from 89-95 miles per hour and stays around 93. He has a slider/cutter at 89 that has a lot of sharp, crisp bite. His out pitch is what he calls a forkball that has real diving, late action at the right-handed hitter.
"He's a strike thrower, and he's very athletic, a Gold Glove-like fielder. The biggest thing, for me, is that with runners on base, he buckles down. He really is a warrior."
http://tinyurl.com/2e7u4k
Hmmm. He might want to try buckling down and being a warrior before runners get on base in the first place.
Imagine this scenario in 2008:
Martin: .310/.385/.470
Loney: .325/.390/.525
LaRoche: .280/.380/.500
Kemp: .315/.355/.550
Young: .290/.350/.480
Billingsley: 21-6, 2.85 ERA
McDonald: 9-4, 3.48 ERA (midseason callup)
Kershaw: 7-2, 3.18 ERA (midseason callup)
Broxton: 1.80 ERA
Meloan: 2.45 ERA
Dodgers go 103-59, running away with the NL West.
But Kuroda flames out (think Rick Vaughn as a starter).
Ned has a meeting with Logan White in November 2008, not long after the Dodgers celebrate their first world championship in 20 years. "Sorry Logan, Kuroda didn't work out. Please turn in your key card and Dodger-issued hairpiece to HR by the end of the day. What's that, you don't have a hairpiece?"
I have never had it, but my friends who have absolutely love it.
I'm kicking myself because I canceled HBO a couple of weeks ago without knowing about the Extras' finale coming up.
The Dark Knight trailer looks good. Looks like Heath Ledger was a great pick for the Joker.
388 - Gonna try to watch it tonight.
It'll be interesting to see what this shuuto actually looks like, which White describes as a slider.
WWSH
Wait a minute! There's a "Me & Ed's" on Carson? That's awesome.
The existence of the shuuto was doubted by Rob Neyer and Bill James when I asked them about it at a SABR Convention. They were discussing their guide to pitchers and they thought that the shuuto was just another variation of the slider.
I thought it is a screwball. But I guess some people call screwballs, backwards sliders anyways.
I do not think so. All my friends who had it, had it in Fresno.
Everyone hear that the Lost season premiere is 1/31?
On a related note, what's your opinion on the gyroball, Bob? I.e. does that exist?
I think shuuto sounds better than slider, so I'll call it that anyway. :)
WWSH
397 Im a sausage and mushroom kinda guy myself, but the pepp is nice.
Until yesterday, everyone was, rightly, afraid that some of the youngsters would get traded for a pitcher. It's not that farfetched to think that Bedard, in a stretch, could be that "jawdropper" that Colletti would exchange for Kemp, and others. Instead, we have a pitcher who is maybe something of a gamble, but not over market rates, and for the minimum number of years possible. He's there as a number 4 and to fill the gap if/when Lowe goes, Penny falters, whatever, and without trading a single youngster. Not even the ones who haven't fully established themselves yet - Hu, Abreu, and so on. And without spending any more than last year. McCourt has the money and is willing to spend it.
Within two years, it will become clear which of the youngsters are superstars, which are stars, and which are expendable and have no position available to fill. It will cost a lot of money to sign the ones we want to keep to FA extensions, starting with Russell Martin and moving on very rapidly from there. Having Kuroda for 3 years will allow us to wait for the right FA pitcher, not to rush into things. Only 2008 will show whether in fact he was a good purchase, but for goodness sake, he's clearly a good risk with no loss of our other good risks and prospects.
does francisco rodriguez throw a shuuto?
I used to go to those batting cages a lot when I lived in Long Beach. Probably not enough if you ask my softball teammates. :)
Re: Kuroda, Wasn't there a quote from Kenji Johjima before that first Red Sox/Mariners game last season to the effect of, "Sure Dice-K throws a gyroball, over here we call it a [--i dont remember, someone help me out--]"?
And does anybody else think this Kuroda signing looks kinda like a more high-end version of my Phils bringing in Adam Eaton for rotation depth last offseason?
The Adam Eaton comparison is the "worst case scenario" in the Kuroda Accord.
390 Ledger looks like a surprisingly inspired choice by Christopher Nolan for the role of the Joker, much like Daniel Craig was for James Bond in "Casino Royale". There was quite some public dismay initially expressed when each of those actors were announced for their respective roles. I was taken aback but open-minded in each of those instances.
386 , 396 , 399 There used to be a Me-N-Ed's over in Costa Mesa but that location recently changed its name to South Coast Pizza Parlor even though it continued to have the same menu. Apparently, that location chose to stick with its Shakey's style offerings rather than keep up with the Me-N-Ed's revamp of its brand. I'm actually curious to see what an MNE pizza taste like nowadays.
If I recall correctly, the biggest wishes were to get rid of Pierre, give LaRoche a chance at third (unless ARod was signed), and avoid trading the best young players. It looks quite likely that all of these will come to pass. In the bargain, we have Jones in CF and Kuroda. I'm optimistic Jones will bounce back to his regular level this year, which will give us a very strong outfield. Pierre is likely on his way out. LaRoche will have a shot at third, and may not need to wait for Nomar to struggle (remember, Torre found a way to use Betemit). Kuroda is a good risk, particularly with Logan White on his side and in light of the other available FA talent, the trade market, and the uncertainty surrounding Schmidt and Loaiza.
Overall, I'm quite pleased with the job Colletti has done this year, especially in comparison to his early work.
'While fans clamor for a new third baseman like Scott Rolen, management is believed more interested in deepening the bullpen and bench, while letting Nomar Garciaparra and Andy LaRoche compete for third base in the spring.'
who's clamoring? sorry if this has already been posted.
I feel for the first time in years that the Dodgers are a club that can seriously contend for a playoff spot, but is also in a position to make moves in July if necessary, and also has some depth in the minors for replacements later in the season if things don't work out.
Remember since Lowe is a Boras client and this is his walk year if all pitchers are doing well but we need something else with our depth at pitching we could afford to trade Lowe.
This signing if we wanted to get crazy and the price were to come down, could also let the Dodgers back into the Santana sweepstakes, if they wanted to take a look. What if we offered Young, Billingsley, Meleon and one other prospect not Krenshaw for Santana. Doubt Minnisota would take it, but how about a rotation of Lowe, Santana, Penny, Kuroda, Scmidt/Loiaza. That would be an amazing rotation
If this is viewed a chess move against our own GM, as though Kuroda ensures that Kemp won't be traded then Dodger baseball is the sadly cynical. We compete against another philosophy, reliant on luck and politics in to "win" our decisions in the process.
I think the Dodgers have so many question marks going forward that contending this season is highly unlikely. It isn't that there isn't the potential for greatness (or at least potential of above average minimum making), but, there are so many "ifs" that surely someone of them won't become "thens." In 2009 some contracts will be up and there will be enough flexibility to adjust depending on how Andruw bounces back, how well Kemp learns to take a walk, how many opportunities Laroche gets (preferably injury free), how well Saito and Kent defy time and what are the backups, how does Kershaw gain control, how are Kuo, Furcal and Schmidt's recoveries and now Kuroda. A big run this year would be like rolling Yahtzee on the first roll, wonderful if it happens, but don't bank on it.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.