Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
It should be a fierce year of basketball in the Pacific 10 Conference. It should be, anyway.
Kicking off the conference schedule tonight:
UCLA at Stanford
USC at California
Oregon State at Arizona
Oregon at Arizona State
Undefeated Washington State seems destined to start the season tied for fifth place.
Also, I am willing to entertain non-partisan comments and updates on the Iowa caucusi today. Too much is being made of them, but on the other hand, we can't really talk about Wilson Valdez being sold to a Korean team all day (as reported in the Times), can we?
On the other other hand, there's nothing like a Jose Lima update to heat up the winter months. (Imagine: Valdez, Lima, Jae Seo and Hee Seop Choi, all on the same squad!)
D'oh!
Discussionwise, I assume we can get a couple of hours out of "caucusi".
I'm pro.
But then, I also think that the correct plural of "Bigfoot" is "Bigfeet."
Paul DePodesta leans back in his chair and arches his figers, Montgomery Burns-style, and says, "Excellent."
Yes, I know that Seo did not play on the DePodesta Dodgers. But he could have!
I'm the kind of person who thinks the past tense of "sneeze" should be "snoze" (a la freeze-froze), the past tense of "fit" should be "fat" (a la sit-sat), and so on.
This does bring up the question of how takes over the role of useless utility guy, since I don't think having Abreu or Hu on the 25 man to start the year would help their development.
Knock yourself out.
As in, "I didn't break that, my brother brooke it."
Pretty clever, I thought.
Also, I spent some time yesterday reading some blogs from the political reporters at the Washington post and Wall Street Journal and the comment sections reveal that every candidate has some incredibly stupid/criminally insane followers.
Ummmm... Anyone? Anyone?
Wilson Cruz might be a bigger power threat than Wilson Valdez.
Left Field - 97 m
Center Field - 113 m
Right Field - 97 m
"Beyond message, the results in Iowa tonight will hinge heavily on the organizations that the campaigns have built. That's because a caucus is a more complicated process than a primary. Participants can't just show up anytime during the day to cast a secret ballot. They have to appear at a specified time tonight at one of nearly 3,500 sites in school auditoriums, church halls and fire stations, and commit to spending up to several hours there in open discussion. If turnout estimates are accurate, just over 10% of Iowa's voting-age population will participate."
It only works if we let it. Vive l'indifference! It does so much and requires so little.
http://GuoMania.blogspot.com/
vr, Xei
The stadium was originally designed to be expandable to 85,000 seats, simply by enclosing the outfield pavilion. However, the Dodgers have never even considered such a project.
Aside from the parking, I'd have to think it would be great to have more seats -- especially if they were cheap.
What are the legal/contractual obligations for Wilson Valdez in such a transaction? Is this like being sold/traded to the Atlanta Braves or any other MLB team? Usually when one hears of such change in scenery (playing in Japan or Mexico for example) it's the players decision to go play there. I certainly hope that it was WValdez (or his agent) who initiated this. (I can't imagine the Player's Union accepting anything but )
I vote for left field!
Nice fantasy, anyway.
Winnie Cooper is 33?!?!? So that makes me... yikes, I'm getting old.
Loney's awesomeness can be tough for some of us mere mortals to distinguish. (especially when hidden under a knit cap)
O'Malley wouldn't have wanted that many seats in Dodger Stadium. If there are a lot of seats available, then people won't buy season tickets because everybody can get a ticket if they need one.
That's my guess.
It used to be that candidates from outside the power structure of the party could get the nomination by winning those primaries. I believe that that system is how you get a McGovern or a Carter as your candidate. I think that's a good ideal, so I used to think it was a bad idea to have a national primary on a single day. Such a scheme would reward candidates with the infrastructure to handle a nationwide election from the beginning, rather than building momentum.
But now, I'm convinced that we're already there. Who are our front-runners? The candidates with the big fund-raising machines behind them.
If we've already abandoned that ideal, let's just have everybody vote on the same day. Eliminate the caucuses; every state has a primary and we do it on the first Tuesday in May, six months exactly before the general election.
There is an easy way to make this happen: the parties make new rules saying that a state's delegates would not be seated at the convention unless their delegates were elected in a certain manner. The state legislatures, of course, want their delegates seated, so they will overhaul their systems. That's what happened after '68; it would happen again.
Which raises a question: how does accepting campaign donations (with the explicit or implicit agreement that a winning candidate will repay the donations through favorable legislation, no-bid contracts, cushy job appointments, etc. for the donors) not violate whatever principle is violated by bribery?
http://www.instantrunoff.com/
My personal feeling is that money is property. If money is speech, then some people have more speech than others. If you have a billion dollars, you can drown out my voice, because I am poor. That seems un-American to me, but I am not a Constitutional Law scholar.
A) A Constitutional amendment specifically barring this type of bribery would, of course, supersede the specious SCOTUS ruling that money constitutes speech. Is there even a remote possibility that such an amendment could be passed in our lifetimes, or is the money machine already too powerful for that?
B) If (A) doesn't happen, what are the chances that SCOTUS actually reverses itself on this issue within our lifetimes?
Of course, this is legally true. But is there anybody who believes it's ACTUALLY true?
OK, rant over. For now.
A) Such an amendment would never pass.
B) None.
Huckabee did not begin this campaign with a national infrastructure, but he could very well take Iowa today and even New Hampshire.
To a lesser extent, same with Edwards. He was the vice-presidential nominee in '04, so it's not quite the same thing, but he is far behind Clinton and Obama in fundraising. He needs to win in Iowa, and probably in New Hampshire as well, if he is going to stand a chance. He could do that.
Of course, neither of them has the nomination yet, and even sewing up both Iowa and NH wouldn't necessarily put it in the bag like it did for Kerry. If this race ends up being Edwards-Huckabee, then perhaps the system is not in the dire straights that I suggested in 49 . If, on the other hand, we have Clinton-Giuliani, then I think a national primary with the instant runoff that Zappala suggests would be a better way to go.
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/
A national primary this year would likely give us a Clinton-Giuliani race, as both of them are the national front-runners. (Although I think Huckabee has just overtaken Rudy nationally.) With all the primaries front-loaded like they are this year, the system is essentially turning into a national primary. I'm not sure how much momentum a surprise winner like Edwards will be able to take away from a win in IA or NH.
58 Yes. The point that Penarol1916 makes is the proof. If you gave a conservative like Brownback $10mm he's not going to become a pro-choice, anti-gun candidate. Likewise, if you gave a liberal like Ted Kennedy $10mm he's not going to become a hawkish neocon who opposes abortion.
57 Thus, in my opinion, no need for any Constitutional ammendment.
A better example: International Widget, Inc. wants to ease trade restrictions on widgets that are produced in China and sold to Americans. They give Representative John Q. Shill an enormous campaign contribution and meet with him. They explain to him all the benefits working Americans will receive is trade restrictions on widgets are eased. Rep. Shill introduces the bill, it is passed, and the president signs it into law.
Let's say that Rep. Shill actually believes this is a good law -- he is convinced by the company's argument and finds the counter-argument uncompelling.
That is the kind of system that D4P and Enders are talking about. Even if it's legal and even if the representative believes he's acting in the best interests of his constituents, it still doesn't pass the sniff test.
That may be true, but there are some issues on which candidates are relatively indifferent, where their influence can probably be bought.
vr, Xei
(1) The national primary will give more voices to the system, not fewer. If it ends up being Clinton-Giuliani anyway, I like the idea that the entire party, as a country, chose those candidates -- if that's who the parties want, so be it. The way we have it, if Clinton wins Iowa and NH, she will have the appearance of being unstoppable, whether that's actually true or not. Given the same outcome, I like the former system better than the latter.
(2) I do agree that the instant runoff would have to be a part of it. If Clinton is the first choice of a plurality but the second choice of nobody, she should not be the nominee.
(3) I did acknowledge what you're saying, in my post in 62 .
If you look at campaign spending you'll find most of the money goes to candidates who already strongly support the position that the giver espouses, not to candidates that the giver is trying to influence. The real problem is not bribery, but of the big money people selling candidates who already agree with them in these elections.
Also, I had forgotten how good C-Span's coverage of campaigns can be. Meat and potatoes, man. Good stuff.
Brock is clearly only attempting to run strong in Texas and Idaho.
Shill.
Bobby Seale not only disagrees, but holds you in contempt.
You're with us on those issues or you can vote the other guy.
Even better, I say we have congressional caucuses nominate candidates. Or just have candidates demurely make their interest known and have third parties do the campaigning for him.
Then the candidates can retire to their estates to wait out the election.
I'm just curious to see over the next week or so is the size of the gap between "New Media", Big Media & reality. It gives me a vibe like the SABR vs. Scouts discussions when Moneyball hit.
TINSTAAPCanindate?
Even if everything is above-board, it still gives the appearance of wrongdoing.
John McCain used to talk about that. He was one of the Keating Five. He steadfastly maintains that he did nothing wrong, but the experience made him realize why money had to be divorced from politics. The appearance of bribery tainted the process.
This would allow a nice compromise of placating the political parties' establishment (who usually like the early frontrunners) and the rank-and-file (who usually like the outsiders/dark horses). It also is far more fair to voters in the 48 states not named Iowa or New Hampshire.
"White Sox acquired OF Nick Swisher from the Athletics in exchange for LHP Gio Gonzalez, RHP Fautino De Los Santos and OF Ryan Sweeney."
John Q. Public is taking his kids to school and working on his home remodeling. He ain't reading Kos or Free Republic.
I'll believe the impact of "New Media" when I see it.
(1) Iowa and New Hampshire would move their dates before CA/NY; or
(2) The parties would refuse to seat CA's and NY's delegates at the convention. Under party rules, Iowa must be the first caucus, followed by NH, the first primary. If a state operates differently, the party can refuse to seat the delegates. This happened in, I think, 1972, with, I think, Louisiana. I could be wrong about the date and the state.
If you want change, you first need the parties to overhaul their rules.
I highly doubt that would meet the fire code standards for exits and total capacity. Didn't the stadium lose some seating the Corner reserves after McCourt put in the extra infield seats?
ABC News told me last night that Iowa's caucuses weren't a big deal at all until 1976 when Carter came from nowhere and won; that showed the pols how a quintessential outsider could get into the game, rather than the previous system of semi-official anointment.
The Democrats are doing that to Michigan this year, as "punishment" for moving their primary to Jan. 15.
I'm the Ted McGinley of primary voters.
My father was the Clay Bellinger of presidential voters. He always voted for the winner.
Or so he said.
I think my representative in Congress and even my senators would listen to my concerns. I can write them letters and if I visit Washington, I would bet they would come shake my hand and listen to what I had to say.
I do not think that I could ever get the ear of a presidential candidate.
On a more serious note, I agree that the appearance of bribery is not a good thing. But what then should be done to limit the "appearance of bribery"? Eliminate all money contributions? Terrible idea, not to mention unconstitutional. I also think it's highly unfortunate that an "appearance of bribery" (or the "appearance" of anything, for that matter) is what many candidates use to attack an opponent. "Appearances" go a long way in this day of soundbites and smears. However, this in not a flaw in our system, it's a flaw in us as voters. We need to do our homework and not allow shallow arguments based upon appearances of bribery (or anyting else) make our decisions for us.
(reads poll data)
Oh, I think Giuliani will still be on the ballot in March.
1968 - Humphrey
1972 - McGovern
1976 - Eugene McCarthy
1980 - Carter
1984 - Mondale
1988 - Dukakis
1992 - Perot
1996 - Nader
2000 - Gore
2004 - Kerry
Ugh.
Is Giuliani EE's preferred candidate overall, or just for the Republican nominee?
However, Election Day was November 8, so I wonder what she was still doing in the hospital as I believe there were no complications in the delivery.
I just finished reading Manhunt, the book about the Lincoln assassination, and one thing I found surprising is that the author contends that in 1865, it was possible for any ordinary citizen to just walk into the White House, request a meeting with the President, and be given a few minutes of Lincoln's time later that same day.
If I tried that today, I'd end up at Guantanamo.
I do not understand how the second sentence follows from the first. If you give broadcast time directly to the parties, won't you be watching "skewed political coverage" by definition?
Also, I can't imagine what societal ill would be fixed by state-run television.
You new at this, Senator?
Beats the pants off CBS.
1) Obama, Edwards, Clinton
2) Romney, Huckabee, McCain
I think that's my best guess. Like anything else in life, I'd love to see some upsets/surprises.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117978367.html
Joey has a cup of coffee. There's a hot girl next to Joey.
Phoebe (pointing at hot girl): You see that girl? She reminds me that I do not like my new boyfriend. He is not committed to the advancement of the proletariat!
Laughs on the laugh track.
Joey (turns to hot girl, lips move to the phrase "how YOU doin'?"): Viva la Revolucion! (drinks coffee)
Laughs on the laugh track.
NOW
Penarol getting kicked in the crotch
NEXT
Penarol getting kicked in the crotch
LATER
Penarol getting kicked in the crotch
Three weeks ago, I would've wagered money on a Giuliani/Huckabee ticket for the GOP. Now I'm not so sure. Huck seems like a perfect VP candidate for the Republicans, but it actually looks like he might pull off the top slot.
For the Democrats, I still think Hillary is a mortal lock. Her VP will probably be a left-field choice, like Wesley Clark.
It's just not that big a disparity.
America's Funniest Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch
Law & Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch
Everybody Loves Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch
Popular position to have, I know.
Who Wants to Kick Penarol in the Crotch?
Friday Night Kicks to Penarol's Crotch
and so on. The key would be that I would not go more than 5 minutes without getting kicked in the crotch with no reruns. And I would still enjoy it more than CBS, especially coverage of the Masters, my least favorite annual sporting event.
Bob Saget thanks people like you for his millions of dollars.
Thank God it's kick Penarol1916 In The Crotch night would be watchable.
Amos Q. Farmer has less influence because he does. Most people aren't farmers anymore.
I wonder what it would take to get Blanton?
And if Beane does trade Blanton, I wonder if the A's would win more than 45 games?
Obama, Edwards, Clinton
Huckabee, Romney, McCain
This will settle nothing and the spotlight will move on to NH.
We Own Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch
The Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch Ultimatum
Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch at World's End
There Will Be Blood When Penarol Gets Kicked in the Crotch
Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch by the Coward Robert Ford
No Country For Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch
3:10 to Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch
and then a classic...
Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Penarol Getting Kicked in the Crotch
Vote Tammany!
I try not to anger the farmers.
http://weblogs.variety.com/season_pass/2008/01/law-order-and-e.html
You have Amos Q. Agroindustrial Corporation to thank for that one.
The team might have a decent offense, but they have very little pitching and no defense other than the left side of the infield. Plus they have to contend with Cleveland and Detroit this year. I could appreciate the move if it meant the Sox would contend in 2-3 years with Swisher being a big part of the offense, but they only have two B prospects left and no one good but Buerhle and maybe Danks and Fields locked up to 2010. It just seems like suicide for the White Sox
Is anyone here an actuarial? I know I should ask the ones in my building, but I was recounting a story to my 6-yo, and it occurred to me that if smoking has decreased in a significant way, would not house fires have decreased by a close amount? My crazy mind wants to know.
I think the people who work in actuarial science are called actuaries.
That profession always ranks very high in job satisfaction.
High Fructose Corn Syrup is literally poison. Societies that have never known widespread obesity are experiencing it now because high-fructose corn syrup is being added to so many packaged goods they eat.
It's also why Coca-Cola doesn't taste as good as we of a certain age remember it tasting.
117 one thing I found surprising is that the author contends that in 1865, it was possible for any ordinary citizen to just walk into the White House, request a meeting with the President, and be given a few minutes of Lincoln's time later that same day.
When Lincoln took office, there were lines outside the WH of people wanting federal jobs. People would stand in line all day and all night. They expected Lincoln himself to consider their requests and humble ol' Abe thought it was his duty to give them his time. The Civil War was brewing, and here was Lincoln, talking to some guy about why his brother should be named head of the Kankakee post office.
Lincoln was a great president, but he did some dumb things.
http://www.nida.nih.gov/despr/westat/
I think we have found a new fanerman quote to replace the one on the sidebar.
It's Rule #9 breaking I'm waiting for. It's the only rule that is not rational. It's just superstition/tradition, an unlikely taboo for a blog that values statistics and rational discussion. Since we're a couple months away from even an exhibition no-hitter and there's nothing at stake, it might be a good day to discuss the "no-hitter no-mention process" as opposed to an actual unmentioned no-hitter...
Sugar farmers in Florida and Louisiana have worked with the US corn farmers to put hard quotas on the amount of sugar that can be imported to the US at a reasonable price, thus sugar is so much more expensive in the US than anywhere else in the world it is shocking.
The amount of subsidies we give our corn farmers makes the price of HFC very cheap compared to the rest of the world.
Well, I think I could get by without Mexican coke. I don't really get addicted to that kind of stuff.
It should also be noted that the questions shouldn't be why Mexico and many other countries use sugar in Coke, but why Coke in the US uses corn syrup since soda in the US originally used sugar rather than corn syrup and it was entirely because of the low price of corn syrup compared to sugar in the US that the switch was made.
200 - Fanerman's main contribution is that every time I see his name, he makes me think happily of the Ferryman's Funeral Home episode of WKRP.
http://www.thebaboonbellows.com/?p=339
"Hey, you're young and swingin'
No time to think about tomorrow.
But there ain't no way to deny it,
Someday you're gonna buy it.
Don't hesitate and call Ferryman,
Tomorrow!
Ferryman, Ferryman, he's the man with the plot,
the man with the plan.
Ferryman, Ferryman he's the mortician man who loves you,
a lot!
Bye, Bye
Bye, Bye"
Turn-ons: Tivo, Mexican Coke, that one episode of The Wonder Years
I dont think any position on the 25 man roster is useless. There's varying degrees of usage..unless a player never plays.
Ideally, the Dodgers would be so stacked with talent that even the 25th man on the roster would be an uber prospect. There's nothing wrong with that.
If you have 100Abs to hand out, you dont want Royce Clayton taking them. You want Tony Abreu.
I'm surprised he wasn't shot.
193 During my PR days, I got to know the advertising guy at Asher/Gould who came up with the social marketing concepts that produced California's effective anti-smoking ads. The basic idea was, young would-be smokers disapprove of authority. If their government is telling them "don't smoke," it's counterproductive. Young people hate the government, especially when it plays nanny.
So the advertisers came up with the idea of casting the tobacco industry as the authority figures -- authority figures who are trying to trick you into smoking. Don't let tobacco industry tell you what to do! I'm not sure words like "cancer" or "emphysema" were mentioned. The ads were about "stickin' it to the man" by not smoking.
The campaign seemingly worked. It moved the needle.
Nulear power, non-pasteurized milk, sugar-based cola.
The White Sox are getting an entering their prime CF's, with a career .825 OPS, already signed to a reasonable contract.
I'm not sure what the A's are getting, but it better be something good because there arent many CF'ers that can produce like Swisher that have reasonable contracts.
I dont see how it hurts the White Sox giving up a couple prospects bc you can reload your farm system every single year with having good drafts/international signings. Its not like what they gave up was that close to the big leagues.
Beane's lost alot of his mojo since DePo left IMO. Maybe he should fire his number crunchers and get some new ones.
The White Sox are getting an entering their prime CF's, with a career .825 OPS, already signed to a reasonable contract.
I'm not sure what the A's are getting, but it better be something good because there arent many CF'ers that can produce like Swisher that have reasonable contracts.
I dont see how it hurts the White Sox giving up a couple prospects bc you can reload your farm system every single year with having good drafts/international signings. Its not like what they gave up was that close to the big leagues.
Beane's lost alot of his mojo since DePo left IMO. Maybe he should fire his number crunchers and get some new ones.
The other low-cal sweetener, aspartame (the blue packet) is also suspected of causing brain cancer and lymphoma.
The worst thing about Sucralose (the yellow packet), so far as I know, is that it may or may not cause weird genetic mutations in lab animals.
Everyone has an idea for fixing the system and every idea is different and often diametrically opposed.
1) A National Single Day Primary
2) 5-6 Regional Primaries at 3 week intervals
3) Keep a random selection of small states first before a big 30 state primary.
4) Assigning primary state order on the basis of their election day turnout.
With no clear idea what to do to fix the situation, it is virtually impossible to get up the political will to fix it.
But the temptation to come up with your own is inescapable:
My personal favorite is to split the country into 5 regions (10 states each) and randomly select one from each for the first primary day, then do it 3-4 more times before the final super tuesday. It addresses almost all the problems: Most states are smallish so there should always be a good collection of small states where a candidate could press flesh and make himself known, so it wouldn't always mean most money wins. No one region decides the President. Big states don't get screwed out of the process.
I don't believe any diet drink in the U.S. is made with Saccharin any more. It's either aspratame or Splenda.
http://2008.bloggies.com/
Regarding cigarettes and the anti-smoking laws in the books and those pending (in California they're working on signatures to get a bill on the ballot that will raise the price per pack by an additional $1.75 tax. With said $1.75 tax we will all then be given universal health care! Hurray!), I find them rather ironic. On one hand, we hope the extra $1.75 will discourage smoking and increase health. On the other, we're hoping not a single smoker quits because it's up to them to pick up the health care tab. Ahhhh, Government! Awesome!
As for the substance itself, I ain't fer it or agin it.
Greg Brock runs on a pro-salmonella poisoning platform.
It's very edgy.
"Yes, the children need milk that will make them healthy, not sick. But what of the bacteria? Won't anyone think of the bacteria?"
Still edgy. Still frowned upon.
A good trade for Oakland, but making Kenny Williams look foolish isn't rocket science, or even go-cart repair.
Why do you hate the average American raw milk enthusiast? Slave to the special interests, huh?
Also, sometimes I want something with caffeine, but less caffeine than coffee.
You people joke about Schrutebucks and Stanley Nickels. I want to make them a reality.
I drink Diet 7-UP, and what I don't understand is why Canadian Diet 7-Up tastes so much better than the American version. They both use aspertame. Though looking at a Canadian bottle, I see the Canadian version also has something called acesulfame-potassium, and I don't know if the US kind has that.
I've actually never seen an episode of The Wonder Years in its entirety. I was a bit too young to enjoy it when it was on. I suppose I thought Danica was pretty (and still is), though. I'm not really as much into her as other people here, though I do think it's awesome that she's into math.
It's the fourth rail of American politics.
She bought a home pasteurizing machine.
Sure, my baby is starving. My child needs her mother's milk. But what of me? Won't anyone think of me?
Isn't it strange that so many adult humans think it's normal to drink cow's milk, but bizarre to drink human's milk?
Wow, the Swisher trade surprised the heck out of me. Getting Gio Gonzalez and de los Santos is a nice score, I guess. They sure will have a strong AAA team this year, at the least. I look forward to Ken Arneson's assessment.
Think about the man selling pasteurization machines door to door, now jobless.
Who weeps for him?
Yeah. Will Exxon ever pay?
If you haven't seen Penarol get kicked in the crotch, then it's new to you.
I resent 251. because I think Marty only likes this thread because of personal animus towards me and enjoys the thought of me getting kicked repeatedly in the crotch.
Chalk up another benefit of a visit to Hawaii. The older better formula 7-Up still seems to be used there, at least at the Maui Costco. Wife said it's just that things taste better on vacation. That may be true about the BLT at the Hyatt, but there is a definite recipe difference to the 7-Up. Maybe corn syrup hasn't made its way there yet.
I don't like the Swisher trade because it kills whatever vague hope there was for a Pierre-to-White-Sox trade.
Harold Steuve would kiss you if he were alive.
Turkey drop, explained. Not an old person's expression, though I guess it could become a 39 yr old's expression very soon.
http://radio.about.com/library/weekly/blwkrpturkey.htm
Once I saw Kevin Arnold turn down Madeline in his French class, I knew he had horrible taste. I mean come on, Winnie for Madeline, that's like pasteurized blue non-fat milk in place of the pure whole milk.
283 Ah. A WKRP reference. I will have to check if NetFlix has this. Though maybe I should put The Wonder Years on first (if that's available).
280. Who is Jan Smithers?
Don't forget to participate in the exciting Orange Bowl chat over on the Griddle tonight.
Over/under on comments - 10.
http://tinyurl.com/2hlko9
The odds are for entertainment purposes only.
But the over/under line is -350.
In less less - but still somewhat - distressing news, my soccer team's keeper broke a bone in his foot this week so I have to find another keeper for our upcoming season. Did he break it playing soccer, you ask? No, you'd assume that, but no, he hurt it - I kid you not - while hanging laundry to dry and turned his foot wrong. That's like a plot out of WKRP. Sigh.
I pitched for my baseball team in High School and played goalie for the soccer team. Goalie was a lot more fun and exciting.
http://www.celebritynooz.com/watn/jan_smithers.html
Straight outta Taft High School:
http://www.tafthigh.org/achievements.jsp
:(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WKRP_in_Cincinnati_episodes
Bailey's Show
For Love or Money
Bailey's Big Break
I Am Woman (Save the Flimm!)
Dear Liar
Rumors
Excellent Smithers episodes
But instead, I've got a whole new post at Screen Jam dedicated to them.
Instead there is just a bunch of political talk.
After moving to Canada 6 six years ago, I have taken a sabbatical from thinking about U.S. politics...
Have fun with the elections everyone! Better you than me...
Where's CanuckDodger anyway, we can chat about the Bastardo prospect or something... ;)
anyways, I believe I can say I'm on board for the New Whig party. I'm currently registered under Nation of Ulysses, which certainly rules me out of future Public Service.
I'm surprised nobody jumped on KevinP's Lebowski reference. Lebowski references are the lifeblood of conversation 'round my parts.
286 Wonder Years is not yet available on DVD to my best recollection. I did sign an online petition some time ago, but haven't heard anything since. Hopefully, the petitino I signed for the movie Rad comes through any day now. Seems I had luck with the MTV show the State.
lastly, sorry to hear about the wyf, Pen.
Sorry for the long post everyone.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/LAN/LAN195804180.shtml
I think Erskine is speaking with Jeff Kent, who called to tell everyone to tuck in their jerseys.
The blog entry is dated January 2, so perhaps it was completed last night.
http://tinyurl.com/29zj49
Choice parts:
>>Gonzalez seems stung by the perception in some quarters that he was a divisive influence in Los Angeles last season. One Southern California columnist wrote that he and Nomar Garciaparra "sniped" quietly behind the scenes about their lack of at-bats.
"I read the stuff about how I was upset over losing playing time," Gonzalez told ESPN.com. "But I'd be shocked if any of the young guys said anything negative about me. I was the guy taking them to lunch and always telling them, 'Hey, I'm here for you guys if you need me.'
"I'm a 40-year-old veteran. I've been around. I'm not blind when I see a 23- or 24-year-old kid who comes up and has all the potential in the world. I understand I'm not the same player that I was when I was hitting 30-plus homers and driving in 100 runs in Arizona. But I still feel like I've got a lot left in the tank to prove something to people.">"The kids came up with some arrogance," said a person with knowledge of the Dodgers' situation who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "They've been told how great they are for so long, they think they're accomplished when they're not. But when things start to falter, you look for the veteran guys to steady it. When [Gonzalez's] playing time decreased, he started to become a little less of a team guy."<<
I live in the lower mainland area near Vancouver.
I moved here because I married a great Canadian girl and Canada was much more welcoming to me coming here than the States were to her going there.
It actually worked out really good as I got a great job soon after I came that allowed me to work here until I received my residency last year.
I grew up in the San Fernando and Antelope Valley's in California, as well as 4 years in Virginia while in the U.S. Coast Guard.
That is my story!
How about you? Which part of Canada are you from? And how did you become a Dodger fan?
Heck: I'd settle for dying in Canada.
Just kidding. I'm proud to be an Amurrican.
There is a large Coast Guard base there with 6 Coast Guard Cutters, (I was on the C.G.C Tampa), a small boat station and a bunch of other units, buoy tenders, tug boats, smaller patrol boats.
Dems-In 1992 Tom Harkin won while Clinton got 2.8% of the votes.
In '88 Gephardt won. In '76 & '72 the winner was "Uncommitted". Muskie was 2nd in '72.
GOP-Dole won in '96 & '88 (he was 8th in '80). Bush beat Reagan in '80.
The Dodgers/Yankees 1977 World Series was the first baseball I ever saw on TV. I played baseball before, as a young kid, but for some reason I just never saw MLB baseball on TV before that. I don't know why, but I just fell in love with the Dodgers, and I instantly hated the Yankees.
Montreal was great too, but too much snow.
I work over off the Maryhill bypass now in Poco. How is that for a small world?
We could have a mini DT day if the bums ever come to Safeco...
Because you inherently understand the natural and proper order of things.
And where did Jeff Kent do his chastising? Oh yeah, to the press also.
I'm sure the open drug use of the east end and Pigeon Park would shock just about anyone regardless of where they come from.
But there is the east end that Canuck and I mentioned before!
How far is that from the school? Isn't the school on the west end...?
Actually that show has already been done.
Possibly the funniest video of all time.
http://tinyurl.com/j6t6h
Far, far away.
Vancouver Island is where I wanted to retire but it is probably to pricey now. Maybe I'll buy a floating house in Bamfield.
That's what I'm afraid of. I like short commutes.
Was DaVinci's Inquest actually filmed in Vancouver or some other Canadian city?
Awesome
Ernesto Hoost is a champion kickboxer to anyone who does not know.
Did you watch Fedor's bout with Choi?
You know, a 7'2" Korean kick boxer... And the funny thing is people are angry Fedor is being fed a can. That is a one big can.
The video is all over the internet though if your interested in watching it.
It was kinda fun. As you may know, Fedor won by armbar, but had a previous armbar sunk pretty deep before Choi escaped. Fedor's face was badly bruised at the end.
356
All mixed martial artists lose, which is partly what makes this one (i.e. Fedor Emelianenko) so impressive. He's 27-1, with the lone loss coming from an illegal elbow strike that should have had the bout ruled a "No contest".
I don't think Choi should be deemed a "can" yet. He's too big and hasn't really shown whether he's good or bad.
I always dread him getting cut and losing to a lesser mortal.
The great think about Fedor is that he seems like such a nice guy. Always polite and friendly and respectful.
I'll reserve comment.
Still reserving . . .
Except caucus isn't a Latin word.
OED etymology:
Arose in New England: origin obscure.
Alleged to have been used in Boston U.S. before 1724; quotations go back to 1763. Already in 1774 Gordon (Hist. Amer. Rev.) could obtain no 'satisfactory account of the origin of the name'. Mr. Pickering, in 1816, as a mere guess, thought it 'not improbable that caucus might be a corruption of caulkers', the word "meetings" being understood'. For this, and the more detailed statement quoted in Webster, there is absolutely no evidence beyond the similarity of sound; and the word was actually in use before the date (1770) of the event mentioned in Webster. Dr. J. H. Trumbull (Proc. Amer. Philol. Assoc. 1872) has suggested possible derivation from an Algonkin word cau´-cau-as´u, which occurs in Capt. Smith's Virginia 23, as Caw-cawaassough 'one who advises, urges, encourages', from a vb. meaning primarily 'to talk to', hence 'to give counsel, advise, encourage', and 'to urge, promote, incite to action'. For such a derivation there is claimed the general suitability of the form and sense, and it is stated that Indian names were commonly taken by clubs and secret associations in New England; but there appears to be no direct evidence.]
It's wonderfully anachronistic.
are they gonna be allowed to Caw-cawaassough too?
He also seems very nice, which makes me like him even more.
Just you wait, 'eric 'enders, just you wait...
The Chicago Style Manual uses Webster's Third New International.
The National Spelling Bee uses Webster's Third New International.
Really, any self-respecting person should.
I don't consider "UFC vet vs. Pride vet fighting in octagon under UFC rules" to be a legitimate "UFC vs. Pride" comparison. It's too much of a "homefield advantage" for the UFC guys.
I will always think Pride was better.
A lot of the Pride guys made their reputation on destroying the ex-UFC champs like Randleman, Kerr and Coleman.
I don't think Fedor doesn't experience the same fate though if he came over here.
Stan from Tacoma
377 Why doesn't the UFC just start allowing knees to a downed opponent? It is certainly a factor in the world of MMA. If this rule were to be instated, I can promise that those boring 3 round wrestle-fests would end more quickly.
Allow me to make a plug for my New Oxford American Dictionary, which is a good single-volume dictionary and about one-third the price of the Webster's Third New International.
Also: if you are a person who enjoys Rule One violations... no dictionary shelf is complete without J.E. Lighter's Historical Dictionary of American Slang, or what you can get of it.
It isn't up to them. In order to be "legitimate", they allow themselves to be regulated and subject to a set of rules determined by some kind of athletic commission body.
media friendly yes, but there is more than meets the eye. Full article on ESPN.Com [http://tinyurl.com/29zj49]
I wish I knew the person who taped Vin's broadcasts from KTAR in Phoenix. I have a few Vin broadcasts in my collection and they are from KTAR or Armed Forces Radio. There must be some old reel to reel tapes in some attics in LA from Dodger fans who taped Vin's broadcasts. I hope they are discovered for all the world to hear.
Stan from Tacoma
Your right.
I say we hijack this thread back and start talking about the premier of "Celebrity Apprentice" which is starting tonight.
Off the glass!
Moving screen guy was James Keefe, not Kevin Love.
The catch phrase you are looking for is "play in the Association."
Yep. Fedor by armbar/kimura.
It hurt Oregon more than it hurt ASU. Oregon is no good this year.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.