Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Chapter infinity in the long-running tome, Dodger Self-Sabotage, as told by shortstop Rafael Furcal to Tony Jackson of the Daily News:
"Hitting right-handed, I felt better. But left-handed, I couldn't stand on my ankle. But I didn't say anything because I wanted to keep playing. After the season, I got a lot of treatment before I started playing (in the Dominican Winter League), and that made me feel so good."
So, combining treatment with rest improved a player's physical condition and made him able to perform better. Fascinating.
Previously on Dodger Thoughts: "We Have Ways of Making You Go On the DL"
On the up side, Andruw Jones, among others, has a green light.
"Last season was very uncomfortable, especially with the bad start we had. There were a lot of questions and stories I had to address.
"I'm sure it took its toll on me, but when you walk into the clubhouse and all of a sudden the players aren't sure what they should say, what they shouldn't say, your coaching staff, that made it doubly uncomfortable for me. I just think over the last few years it was gradually getting to the point of not being a helluva lot of fun. The baseball was still fun, but aside from that ..."
Torre also indicated what he sees with his own eyes will have the final say in his decisions.
He'll rely on scouting reports and his coaches, at least initially, when it comes to making moves.
"Stats don't really tell you anything. You really have to watch these guys," he said. "You have to look and realize that you have a feel for what you want to do. Because numbers are important, but numbers don't tell you everything. Your eye has to tell you that."
How come no one ever asks the follow-up question, "What are you seeing that isn't reflected in a player's statistics? How are hustle or intelligence or desire not accounted for, if in fact they have an impact on performance? Or are you just looking at the wrong stats?"
Update: Odalis Perez has signed a non-guaranteed contract with Washington, Enrique Rojas of ESPNdeportes.com reports. "Odalis has worked extremely hard this winter and he is in top shape," Fitzgerald Astacio, a spokesman for Perez, told ESPNdeportes.com on Tuesday.
Well, you can go back and read it if you hate DHL also.
That quote made me a sad panda.
Actually, I was thinking I had used this very headline before, but I couldn't immediately find it.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3253361
Anyway, as someone who spent basically all of last season begging, pleading, demanding for Furcal to go on the DL because his stubbornness was hurting the team, this story irks me to no end. No, Raffy, I'm not impressed by how much of a gamer you are. I'm not impressed by you playing in pain. What I am is stunned by your stupidity, and regretful that your selfishness contributed to the Dodgers missing the playoffs, particularly when a more-than-able fill-in was available in Chin-Lung Hu.
And the Dodgers are just as much to blame for that happening as Furcal. Even the most hard-line Colletti defenders would, I think, be hard-pressed to find a legitimate defense for Ned's lack of action re Furcal. The player works for the team, not the other way around. If you tell him to go on the DL, he has to go on the DL. All you have to do is grow a pair and tell him. The Dodgers clearly need to be more pro-active in protecting the players from their own stupidity. This is one area in which the Conte administration has been a complete failure so far.
Of course, even if Furcal had admitted he was hurting, the Dodgers may have just accused him of lying about it.
Because the question implies the manager doesn't know what he's talking about. And since a beat writer's ability to make a living depends on staying on the manager's good side, they aren't about to ask a question that insults the manager's intelligence.
Questions like that can really only be asked by columnists, or, say, bloggers who moonlight for SI.com. Credential time!
I'm guessing Turiaf will guard Shaq and Gasol will guard Amare, with Odom hanging around for help. Maybe I'm too worrisome; who knows how well Shaq will play. He's such a wild card right now.
My guess is that Phoenix will have a huge energy boost from the Shaq-hungry crowd. Hopefully, the Lakers can overcome that and pull out a tough win. If the Lakers win tonight (home vs. Atlanta) and win tomorrow, both the Suns and Lakers will be tied atop the division after the game.
It should be a nice showdown game.
Maybe he means that you can't judge a player on few games, week or month. The article doesn't imply that the man never looks at stats, it only implies that he is also going to have see these guys play too.
Can we let the guy manage a few real games before starting to jump on it.
If the Lakers win both games, the Lakers will be tied with the Suns, but the Lakers also own the tiebreaker, which puts the Lakers ahead.
As for 17 Shaq will start per this article.
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/0219shaqtostart.html
I have my "Bob is Right" macro ready just in case.
On the other hand, you have admit that what he says is (at least so far) rather depressing.
Yes.
"Shaq to make debut vs. Lakers"
http://tinyurl.com/2o4l26
Schmidt and Brazoban both threw without issue today, which is obviously a positive. Sandy Koufax was back out again today, this time working with Greg Miller, among others.
There aren't any more details on that and, of course, often the next day is more telling, but it's better than bad news about Schmidt and Brazoban.
http://tinyurl.com/3cjszk
Just a little reminder of what we're going to be losing.
"Because numbers are important. . ."
So which is it Joe? Are there some new fangled stats out there that don't use numbers?
23 - I love that Koufax is looking good this Spring - I just hope that he tells us if he's hurting.
I'm only half-kidding.
That said, I'm not saying it's time to storm the castle with torches, but cutting down a few trees -- just in case -- might not be a bad idea.
Longtime Seattle Mariners' broadcaster Dave Niehaus today was named the recipient of the Ford C. Frick Award, and will be inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame this summer.
He's not elected, but he is inducted, right?
Sounds like the Angels are a candidate to make a trade before the season. I hope the Dodgers offer Pierre to the Reds before the Angels off Gary Matthews.
"Stats don't really tell you anything."
That sounds so old-school that it's almost a straw man.
I thought Little was a scapegoat, and treated shoddily, but I was willing to accept the idea that the supposed chaos in the clubhouse was his responsibility to fix, and that he had to be replaced if he couldn't fix it.
I was OK with the Torre idea for the sole reason that he's someone even the vets will have to respect. For that reason, he was a good, if expensive, choice. But I have no illusions at all that Torre will play the best players, regardless of PVL, and quotes like this one just drive that home.
I think the only way this could happen would be if another DePodesta type were to hire a Manny Acta type. Go "old school" in either job, and be prepared for a lot of teeth-gnashing. The Dodgers are now decidedly old-school in both jobs.
With luck, if Colletti can keep from blowing things up, and trading away youngish talent for aging space-fillers, this team will be like Torre's Yankees - so good that the inane over-use of PVLs (Sojo, Brosius, Cairo, Pierre, Nomar) won't hurt enough to matter.
THAT, I think, is the optimistic scenario - not the delusion that Torre secretly believes in OPS.
I just think he should have watched video or something about the players he didn't know about. It seems absurd that he didn't know much about Matt Kemp, for instance, before becoming manager.
I'm willing to accept that "I haven't seen them yet" was just Torre's stock answer to give reporters.
Swing and a miss by Josh Rawitch.
Dave Niehaus's name will go on a trophy (or is it a plaque) that is kept in a separate part of the National Baseball Hall of Fame AND Museum in Cooperstown. It will be in the Museum, not the Hall of Fame.
Torre could never manage the Red Sox, at least thats for sure.
This is tremendous news for me. Greg Miller right now is pretty much what Sandy Koufax was in 1958 or so. Working with him can only help.
doesn't something look odd about tony abreu's line?
http://tinyurl.com/2mojh7
Priscilla Presley, Kristi Yamaguchi, Adam Carolla, Marlee Matlin, Shannon Elizabeth, Steve Guttenberg, Monica Seles, Penn Jillette, Mario, Jason Taylor, Cristian De La Fuente and Marissa Jaret Winokur.
Who is the Kevin Bacon of this group?
http://www.officetally.com/mini-mose-is-here
Who is the Kevin Bacon of this group?
I'd guess Priscilla Presley.
The Dolphins' Jason Taylor? There really is something for everyone!
Penn Jillete: Kevin Bacon of the group
I'm not following you. What is so odd about Abreu's stats?
Dr. Rumack: "I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you."
48 - Running on auto-pilot, are we? :)
http://tinyurl.com/2ytyqw
http://www.insidesocal.com/tomhoffarth/archives/2008/02/globetrotters_6.html
Leslie Nielsen is connected directly to Presley, and has a 2nd level connection to Carolla, Matlin, Elizabeth, and Guttenberg.
And he probably saw Seles play at the US Open once. :)
Nothing wrong with chopping a few trees down. I'll bring a rake unless my grandpa has a pitchfork I can use.
Tonight on FSN West, after the Laker game, Jerry West is interviewed.
Here is a quote about he has about something that always ate at him, losing.
Q: Why did losing consume him so much?
A: "Everyone wants to be recognized as a champion. Losing in the NBA finals was the ultimate scar ...something I'll never forget."
"But there is an incredible joy in winning, it brings people together and unites cities."
"I expected this incredible feeling to change all those [losing] years, but I'll never be able to forget them. They've left indelible scars."
It might not be a rounding error. More likely, he had 1 HBP and 2 sac flies.
Steve Guttenberg???
Steve Guttenberg???
May I direct you to the wonderful world of Joe Posnanski:
http://tinyurl.com/2xvk68
Much like the 2008 Dodgers.
His record as an executive was 8-5.
(Jon is going to kill me now.)
-
65 Who holds back the electric car?
Who makes Steve Guttenberg, a star?
We do! We do!
(Sorry, it's been a few weeks since my last Simpsons reference.)
Jon has only one bullet.
A Huell Howser and some cheese fries sounds so good right about now. Darn LAT had to bring up Pink's.
I wish interviewers would start interrupting these guys and ask "what DO numbers tell you?" or "Why CAN'T they tell you everything?"
Eric,
Let's just say I do not understand how they stay in business. Thank goodness Frys has had excellent customer service on their end.
Great. Now that song is in my head, and I can picture them all around the table.
On a related point, I read on Fox Sports that Ethier is hitting the hide off the ball in Vero, and that Kent has yet to show up.
He's no worse than most managers, though, and although you'll remember every mistake he makes by going with his gut, as a matter of fact the total impact on the season will be small. No matter what NoMaas says.
Plus, 4 of the NBA Finals losses by West as a player were in Game 7:
1962: lost by 3 pts (Cousy dribbling out the clock)
1966: 2 pts
1969: 2 pts (Don Nelson's shot seemingly hitting the balloons in the ceiling then falling in)
1970: Willis Freaking Reed
The Lakers and the Brooklyn Dodgers certainly had that in common didn't they?
>> Brown's retirement is a good time to look back at the Athletics' 2002 draft and see how the system worked. <<
http://tinyurl.com/2ml4oz
http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_8300588
>>"It's ridiculous," said fan Jay Ricker, 22. "Jeter is all-around awesome."
"I agree," said Science, 424. "[bleep], that is a good argument. I might as well not exist. That's it. I'm taking 500 Darvocets. Humans, welcome your new overlord, Jay Ricker, 22. He is all-around awesome."<<
That said, the retirement of Brown, who was a lightning-rod figure, does seem to be a good time for a post-mortem on the A's 2002 draft.
Moneyball is all about how the A's exploit market inefficiencies to get a leg up on the competition, and a key part of that is the draft. Chass points out that one big difference between the A's and the other teams is that the A's didn't chase any high-school talent in that draft, but he doesn't really explore the point.
I would prefer to see a stats-based exploration of the A's vs. other teams, with, perhaps, an emphasis on the dollars paid to sign that pick. Were the A's exploiting a market inefficiency? Were they choosing from a lesser pool of talent? Is "making it to the majors" a fair judge of success at this point, or is there another criterion we should use?
I don't know the answers to any of these questions, and I think a fair-minded approach to answering them would be fun to read.
The Dodgers losses in the World Series usually weren't of the heartbreaking variety. The heartbreaks were in the tiebreakers for the league or division. The Dodgers are 1-3 in those. And then there are seasons like 1942, when the Cardinals put on the greatest stretch run ever to past the Dodgers (even better than the Rockies last year because it was over a longer period) or 1950 (when the Dodgers blew a chance to force a tie with the Phillies) or 1982 or 1991.
The Dodgers have lost three Game 7s in the World Series (in a seven game series that is): 1947 (5-2), 1952 (4-2), and 1956 (9-0).
The Dodgers heartbreaks are of a different type than the Lakers.
And a big thing is the A's limited budget, they took Brown in the first round because they couldn't afford actual talent. The 2002 draft does seem seem very strong, but ahead of the A's Swisher pick, there's already six definate busts and two guys that are maybes. In the first round, the only pick that I think the A's would make differently now is they would have taken Cain instead of Blanton, but other than that, it's hard to call it anything but a success.
Wow, speaking of heartbreak...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MN0eAGmMOU
Talk about time not healing all wounds!
regairfield is so angry about the Murray Chass article that he's broken a chair. He threw a Jeremy Bonderman autographed baseball at it.
1. Pirates. Bryan Bullington, rhp
4,000,000 IMG
2. Devil Rays. B.J. Upton, ss
4,600,000 Larry Reynolds
3. Reds. Chris Gruler, rhp
2,500,000
Reich, Katz, Landis
4. Orioles. Adam Loewen, lhp
Did not sign Michael Moye
5. Expos. Clint Everts, rhp
2,500,000 Larry Reynolds
6. Royals. Zack Greinke, rhp
2,475,000 SFX
7. Brewers. Prince Fielder, 1b
2,400,000
None
8. Tigers. Scott Moore, ss
2,300,000
GAAMES/Don Mitchell
9. Rockies. Jeff Francis, lhp
1,850,000
Reich, Katz, Landis
10. Rangers. Drew Meyer, ss
1,875,000 SFX
11. Marlins. Jeremy Hermida, of
2,012,500 CSM/Lonnie Cooper
12. Angels. Joe Saunders, lhp
1,825,000
IMG
13. Padres. Khalil Greene, ss
1,500,000 SFX
14. Blue Jays. Russ Adams, ss
1,785,000
CSM/Lonnie Cooper
15. Mets. Scott Kazmir, lhp
2,150,000 Jeff Moorad/Brian Peters
16. Athletics. Nick Swisher, of
1,780,000 Joe Bick
17. Phillies. Cole Hamels, lhp
2,000,000 John Boggs
18. White Sox. Royce Ring, lhp
1,600,000
John Boggs
19. Dodgers. James Loney, 1b
1,500,000 Octagon
20. Twins. Denard Span, of
1,700,000 Octagon
21. Cubs. Bobby Brownlie, rhp
Scott Boras
22. Indians. Jeremy Guthrie, rhp
3,000,000 Scott Boras
23. Braves. Jeff Francoeur, of
2,200,000 Steve Hammond
24. Athletics. Joseph Blanton, rhp
1,400,000 IMG
25. Giants. Matt Cain, rhp
1,375,000 Len Hardison/Kyle Rote Jr.
26. Athletics. John McCurdy, ss
1,375,000 Rick Oliver
27. Diamondbacks. Sergio Santos, ss
1,400,000 Joseph Longo
28. Mariners. John Mayberry Jr., of
Did not sign IMG
29. Astros. Derick Grigsby, rhp
1,125,000 Turner-Gary
30. Athletics. Ben Fritz, rhp
1,200,000 CSMG
SUPPLEMENTAL FIRST ROUND
31. Dodgers. Greg Miller, lhp
1,200,000 GAAMES/Don Mitchell
32. Cubs. Luke Hagerty, lhp
1,150,000 Reich, Katz, Landis
33. Indians. Matt Whitney, 3b
1,125,000 Jim Munsey
34. Braves. Dan Meyer, lhp
1,000,000 None
35. Athletics. Jeremy Brown, c
350,000 None
36. Cubs. Chadd Blasko, rhp
1,050,000 Scott Boras
37. Athletics. Steve Obenchain, rhp
750,000
Michael Moye
38. Cubs. Matt Clanton, rhp
875,000 GAAMES/Don Mitchell
39. Athletics. Mark Teahen, 3b
725,000
IMG
40. Reds. Mark Schramek, 3b
200,000 Momentum Sports
41. Indians. Micah Schilling, 2b
915,000 Larry Reynolds
My big question is -- did the A's philosophy work? Would they have been better off if they'd had a mix of college and high school players?
I mean, we can look at that list and pick out successes that came after busts -- but that's always true. Piazza, par example. The question is: with the talent pool topping out at Swisher-Blanton-Teahen -- which we'll call "pretty good" -- was that the best that just about any team could expect, or should they have done better with the number of picks they had?
He was considered a 2nd round pitching prospect. Not many teams looked at him as a hitter.
"19. Dodgers. Los Angeles will grab a high school position player here. Mayberry is a consensus better prospect over the other candidates (Span, Fielder, Whitney and Moore) who could be available. California high school lefthander Greg Miller is a possibility at No. 31 with the top sandwich pick. Projected Pick: John Mayberry Jr.
...
29. Astros. Houston plays the draft as close to the vest as any club. Reports were circulating as the draft approached that the Astros were nearing an agreement with Texas high school lefthander James Loney. They've also had success with Nevada pitchers, so don't rule out Rasner or Jepsen. Short, hard-throwing righthanders also have worked for Houston, which could mean they'd go for Grigsby. Projected Pick: James Loney."
The Dodgers' 2002 draft is considered awesome, but until they pick up Russell Martin late, it's no more impressive than the A's, with only Loney, Broxton and Young before that. I'd probably take the A's haul ahead of that. Would the Dodgers have done better with the A's picks? Maybe, but you can't call what the A's did a failure.
McDonald is from the 2002 draft too i think.
http://sonsofsamhorn.net/index.php?showtopic=4100
Here are the odds of becoming a regular (as defined by a career WARP3 >= 20) for the 7 picks:
Swisher (16): 32%
Blanton (24): 23%
McCurdy (26): 21%
Fritz (30): 18%
Brown (35): 11%
Obenchain (37): 9%
Teahen (39): 7%
Each draft varies in quality, but in general, the quality starts to fall off quickly when you get to the end of the first round, where the A's have been drafting since 1999. If you look at the 2002 draft specifically, the quality falls off a cliff after Matt Cain was picked at 25. There are only three guys picked between #26 and the end of the supplemental round who have made the majors, and all three have the Oakland A's on their resume.
"Having lost their first-round pick last year after signing free agent Andy Ashby, the Dodgers gambled in two ways, taking high school pitchers with their first six selections, followed by a couple of two-sport athletes. They took Cedric Benson, a raw outfielder with outstanding power, in the 12th round, but his future appears to be on the gridiron after an impressive freshman season as a running back at Texas."
He may be a complete bust, but he still got number 4 overall pick money.
Second reason is, they don't. For example, it is possible for a guy to have had tremendous minor league numbers and fail at the big leagues because he has a hole in his swing, and major league pitchers and catchers, being better at exploiting these holes, ruin the young player's confidence, and he does not adjust. There is a reason coaches like to see people play, so they can assess how, based on their experience of watching major league hitters succeed, these young guys are likely to go. Andy LaRoche could be such a guy.
Statistics are clearly vitally important, and have changed the way everyone thinks about baseball. But to upbraid Torre for saying he will, in part, make decisions based on watching guys play is too cynical. Imagine he said the opposite: I have made my decisions already based on players' statistics. Think of how that affects the players. I know that over a course of a season, statistics explain a good deal of what went on, and most players most of the time perform close to what statistics say they will. But I think there is a bit of post hoc ergo propter hoc in some of this, and people assume that this was inevitable.
If a manager completely mishandles the players, by, for example, announcing that before managing them he has decided based on statistics who is better, it is likely that team will not perform to their best. Motivation is a complex thing.
http://tinyurl.com/2chp3x
>>Los Angeles Dodgers pitching ace Brad Penny looks forward to watching new third base coach Larry Bowa get in somebody's face, even if it's his own.
While Penny professes a great fondness for Grady Little, he believes the Dodgers would have been better off had the former Los Angeles manager or someone on his coaching staff come down harder on the players when mental mistakes were made.
"We damn sure needed it last year. Fourth place," Penny said at the Dodgers' spring training facility. "You need somebody to push you. You know Bowa's doing it for your benefit. I loved watching him in Philly." <<
What, The Windmill didn't provide enough fire for ya, Brad? Well, I guess he mostly provided wind.
http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2008/feb/19/commissioners-ok-dodger-agreement/
"The National Sportscasters and Sportswriters Association (NSSA) has named play-by-play broadcaster Russ Langer the 2007 Nevada Sportscaster of the Year. It marks the third time in the last five years that he has received this award in the state of Nevada (2003, 2005, 2007)."
http://www.oursportscentral.com/services/releases/?id=3594789
Now, compare the A's 2002 draft to the Dodgers 2002 draft. The Dodgers only had a 1st round supplemental pick and an extra 2nd rounder as extra picks compared to the A's avalanche of extra top picks, and because of that the Dodgers spent only about $5 million in signing bonuses on their draft compared to the over $9 million spent by the A's on their draft. And look what the Dodgers got for nearly HALF the money the A's invested in the 2002 draft:
Have Made It To The Majors And Become Fixtures:
James Loney, 1st Round
Jonathan Broxton, 2nd Round
Russell Martin, 17th Round
Have Made It to The Majors But Future TBD:
Delwyn Young, 4th Round
Eric Stults, 15th Round
Prospects Who Will Like Get Their Chances In The Majors:
Greg Miller, 1st Round Supplemental
James McDonald, 11th Round
Jarod Plummer, 26th Round (Now With Royals)
Fringy Prospects Who MIGHT Get to The Majors:
Zach Hammes, 2nd Round
Mike Megrew, 5th Round (Now With Padres)
>>Penny said perceived clubhouse problems were blown out of proportion. That started when veteran second baseman Jeff Kent expressed frustration with some of the team's younger players during the late-season fade.
"Jeff's never going to say anything because he doesn't like you," Penny said. "He's done it to me. He's doing it for my good. Everyone got along." <<
It marks the third time in the last five years that [Langer] has received this award in the state of Nevada (2003, 2005, 2007)
Russ Langer is the Bret Saberhagen of Nevada sportscasters.
>> Joe Torre said today that he has a pretty strong idea of whether he is going to allow Beimel to keep his long hair, but he wouldn't tell us until he tells Joe. Reading between the lines of that, it sounds like a trip to the barber is in Beimel's immediate future, but I could be wrong. <<
http://www.insidesocal.com/dodgers/
I am the opposite of Abe Simpson when it comes to ballplayers' haircuts.
Any discussion of Torre and the HOF has to include the atrocity of forcing Sal Fasano to shave! :)
Now Jeff Kent, there's a haircut you can set your watch to.
Well, I will be officially annoyed with Joe if he does that. I always found those Yankee rules to be so pretentious.
Let them do whatever they want with their hair. Who cares?
http://www.itsonlyrocknroll.com/catphotos/2311.jpg
Bet it's going to be painful for Beimel getting that broken heart tattoo removed.
Gary Sheffield left the Dodgers a long time ago, and his exemption should have followed him out.
Maybe if everyone had to shave for work, but I certainly don't. I honestly don't understand why this would be an issue. I guess if somehow the long hair was interfering with play (I don't know how that would happen), than maybe it would make sense...but what is the big deal with Beimel's hair. Come on, Joe.
I use Bob Gibson. Two main differences between Gibby and Sandy are these.
A)Gibson avoided pitching near 300 innings/per till later--in the late 60's.
B) Gibsons K rate rarely got near 9/9 innings and strikeouts reguire a lot of pitches. Instead his hits/9 innings were always amazing.
Sandy was a bit better, but with a bit of help could have lasted longer.
Also, I find ludicrous the whole societal notion that having long hair or facial hair is somehow morally inferior.
http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/02/daily_news_rumors_catastr.php
I'm not a big hockey fan at all, but the playoff beards in the NHL are excellent.
wait...huh!?!?
Ariza being out an extra two months adds to this.
>> "I'm going to be looking to get out like Randy Moss and Terrell Owens,'' <<
## He said his hip feels good but will play only about 20 minutes against the Lakers, D'Antoni said. O'Neal will be in the starting lineup. ##
http://tinyurl.com/2spd2l
not by a physician or nutritionist.
*I was born after 1974 so I'm glad I didn't have to choose between those games.
I'm with Marty, having a pretty gray goat.
I recently met an old acquaintance with the same, and told him I thought it was time to shave clean and get that perhaps five year benefit in appearance. But he reminded me about the problems of shaving, particularly in the chin area. I was taken aback.
Of course you must add to the calculation that ad often aired on ESPN-- Graybeard gets shot down by the hot date.
It's really a complicated situation!
Graybeard gets shot down by the hot date
REEEEE-jected!
Beards make the man....It's science.
I'm sporting a peach fuss at the moment
I forgot that REEEE-jected..LOL.
Still, I don't want a clean shave regulation
for the D's. I want rugged ind.
And practically speaking, Biemel and Ethier could risk massive loss of blood.
Why was last year disappointing to him when, save for 30 less slugging points, he had an identical or superior year to 2006, after which he became one of the top CFs on the (stupid) market?
What changed?
"Facial hair at that time was an important Middle Eastern symbol of virility and masculinity, and to an extent still is. Those today who do not emulate the beards of the Saudi Arabians and the Shiite Imams of Iran still cling to the bushy mustaches of Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. At the time of the Crusades, the smooth-faced Christians appeared feminine and disgraceful to their adversaries. One chronicler noted that when a Muslim emir brought his children to his tent to present to visiting Christian nobles, his little daughter burst into tears of terror and clung to her father. She had never seen grown men with hairlesss faces in all her life. To her, they looked weird and ugly. Her father agreed, but courtesy would prevent his expression of his opinion."
Still, it's hard to find fault with a 7-2 trip, an NBA record on such a long (continuous) trip.
He's pretty much my idol.
they have Bibby..who always kills the Lakers.
The Hawks do look more imposing with Bibby, Joe Johnson, and Josh Smith.
Also, maybe the Hawks should trade for Joe Smith so they could have the 3 most plain names in the NBA.
Bibby's teams are 16-26 (including playoffs) in his career against the Lakers. Just separating the Kings years though, Bibby is 15-16.
He averages about 2 more points and half an assist less than his career totals against LA, and his shooting percentages are almost identical.
Who would win a fight: the Dos Equis most interesting man in the world guy, or "confidence is very sexy, don't you think?" cologne pitchman Jack Palance?
http://tinyurl.com/2de5xp
http://tinyurl.com/2j4ekx
I may have to add Loney (to Biemel and Ethier) to those who would risk cuts trying to remove their stubble in one session. We may have to consult Troy from West Virginia.
That would be great, and a career high for Odom as well. His high is 19, accomplished 4 times.
In a related story, you can search through individual game logs on basketball-reference.com. Not as good as the baseball-reference.com Play Index (yet), but pretty cool nonetheless.
Looks like my worries were unwarranted.
Lakers look sexy.
RPI is way too close and I am already fearful of seeing a creeping darkness coming up my driveway.
Nate, I think the Lakers might have a shot to win this one tonight.
I need to look this up, but I believe a team got doubled up 124-59 like 10 years ago. I think it was Pacers/Blazers, but I don't remember who was the recipient of the beatdown.
http://www.nba.com/games/20080219/ATLLAL/boxscore.html
http://tinyurl.com/36s2jy
I always get anxiety and indigestion confused.
Also, Cleveland defeated Miami 148-80 on 12/17/91 for the largest NBA margin ever.
And it's not by a team that you would have thought:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/199112170CLE.html
I guess it is who you expected since Eric posted the answer right above mine.
I had to go to the bathroom!
I'm shocked that nobody scored even 19 points in that game.
I will not have the good name of Bob Timmermann sullied like that! :)
But 9 Cavs scored in double figures.
>> The Dodgers also will open their early Minor League camp, having issued invitations to 32 of their top young players not yet on the 40-man roster.
The most celebrated of the group is 19-year-old left-hander Clayton Kershaw, the top-rated player in the organization according to Baseball America. Although Kershaw was not invited to Major League camp, Torre said he'll be visiting before the spring is over.
"We'll see him," Torre said. "We'll take a peek at a bullpen or get him in a game. He'll get exposure." <<
http://tinyurl.com/298sjp
Giants did that for a decade and almost did win. Yes? No?
Does Bob come on tap now or just from the bottle?
---
Hey, has anyone ever tried to watch any ESPNU content online? I thought maybe I'd discovered a way to actually watch something on that channel, a channel that apparently no one with cable actually gets, but it's all broken. Oh well.
There's a guy at work who shows up in a Glen Rice jersey from time to time.
I actually get ESPNU on my cable system. It's reshowing the Purdue-IU game.
No but seriously, why does Comcast not get it then? I've heard complaints from a lot of people nationally. Ah well.
--
Hoo boy, boy howdy, yessir, the Lakers sure ain't playing hospitable hosts tonight.
I get it too and I live in the Bay Area.
The biggest blowout in NBA history had an innocent enough start Tuesday night at the Richfield Coliseum. The score was 0-0 at the opening tap. It was a six-point game early in the second quarter. And even when the Cleveland Cavaliers opened their lead over the Miami Heat to 18 early in the third quarter, Heat fans weren't overly concerned; their team is not among the league's elite and, anyway, NBA teams often rally from such a deficit.
But what followed stunned the 10,487 in attendance - not to mention all 24 players and both head coaches. "I kept looking at the scoreboard and we were up by 30 points . . . 40 points . . . 50 points," said Brad Daugherty, the Cavaliers' center. "And our whole starting team is sitting on the bench. It was an amazing experience."
In the end, it was Cavaliers 148, Heat 80. The result erased the record for winning margin set by the Los Angeles Lakers, who beat Golden State 162-99 on March 19, 1972.
Miami, undoubtedly feeling some heat, rebounded to beat the Indiana Pacers, 118-112, last night.
"It was incredible," Cavaliers Coach Lenny Wilkens said about the Tuesday game. That it was. While sitting on the bench, Heat rookie guard Steve Smith started playing with the figures, trying to figure it all out. "It was getting hard to calculate after a while," he said.
From the third quarter on, the Cavs' margin expanded like hot air in a balloon. The inflated margin was secured when Cleveland outscored Miami 75-27 in the second half. This was made possible when Heat Coach Kevin Loughery pulled his five starters for good with 9:11 left in the third quarter and the Cavs up 81-55.
Loughery already was upset that Cleveland had scored 73 first-half points. When it scored eight straight in the first three minutes of the third period, Loughery had seen enough.
"I told the first group at halftime that they had three minutes to get it together," Loughery explained. "They just weren't getting the job done." However, the replacements were worse. After Alan Ogg, a 7-foot-1, third-string center, hoisted an awkward-looking, one-handed 17-footer that didn't come close, Loughery turned to two reporters on press row and inquired, "You guys wanna play?"
Just before the end of the third period, with the Cavaliers up 106-67, a better suggestion came from a fan in the courtside seats: "Put the coaching staff in."
Wilkens said he didn't realize his club had set a record until he looked at the box score after the game. "We certainly weren't going for it," he said. "I had no idea. All I knew was that our bench was playing great."
No one from the Heat accused Wilkens or his players of running up the score. "We can't fault them," Heat guard Glen Rice said. "The way we played, they should've put it in our faces."
At first, each Heat miss was followed by a Cavs layup or jumper. Then, it was three Cleveland baskets for every Miami basket. Wilkens soon emptied the Cavs' bench, but his reserves kept shooting - and hitting. Every Cleveland player scored, and each played at least 11 minutes. The Cavaliers' bench outscored the entire Heat team 86-80.
"I was paying very close attention to the score," said guard Steve Kerr, the last Cleveland player to enter the game. "Everyone had gotten in the game . . . I'm thinking, `Hey, Coach, I think it's safe now.' Then I get out there and play the whole fourth quarter."
In the 42-13 fourth quarter, Kerr made a three-pointer and a layup. His five points were the difference between the old blowout record and the new.
So when does Mike Bibby join the Hawks? Oh wait, he's playing? Couldn't tell.
Okay, I'm going to do some (mindless) work while watching Mr. Bean's Holiday (mindless entertainment). Buenos noches.
Steve Kerr, the last Cleveland player to enter the game
See, 12th men never amount to anything.
I get Astound, which overall sucks. But when I ordered FSN West to get UCLA games, I also got ESPNU, NFL Channel, and Versus.
I have it ESPNU as well. It was a recent edition to Time Warner (last few months I believe).
The Lakers broke 100 points in 81 of 82 games that year.
It is too bad their recruiting information is terrible, because that would probably be the best part about the channel.
But the actor has a great delivery.
The family of former Dodger Dick Loftus just crossed a name off their list.
>> McKie has yet to play a minute for the Grizzlies. It would be surprising if Van Horn plays for the Nets before his contract expires in June. They are virtual ghosts on their rosters, appearing in name only. <<
http://tinyurl.com/29ybbp
http://dodgerama.blogspot.com/
The boxscore in the LA Times shows Jim Cleamons with ZERO points in that game.
I get ESPNU on cable also. I've even watched it a few times.
Even more obscurely, I get CSTV, which I'm guessing almost nobody does. It means I get to watch Memphis play every once in a while.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.