Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
The Dodgers today named Ellen Harrigan director of baseball administration, making her one of fewer than 10 women (including the team's own Kim Ng) to reach that level in the majors.
Harrigan started out with Toronto in 1981 and came to the Dodgers in 2000. In her most recent position, as assistant director of baseball administration, she dealt with player contracts and waivers, along with coordinating special projects for operations and scouting.
I could see the Angels making a run at Sabathia, especially with Garland's contract expiring after 2008.
...which means I left Garland off the FA list for next year. He'll be 29 in 2009, and his 2008 will go a long way in determining his rank on the FA market.
Last 3 years:
Lowe: 639.1 IP, 118 ERA+
Garland: 640.2 IP, 114 ERA+
Given that Garland is 7 years younger than Lowe, he is more likely to be coveted than Lowe. Still, my point stands that Lowe will garner a lot of attention next offseason.
I could see Lowe getting 3/42 from someone if he has a decent season this year.
My offseason for the Dodgers would have us sign either Furcal or Orlando Hudson and then fill in Hu at the other position. ++ defense at second and short is something we have not seen since the Izturis/Cora tandem. Throw in Jones and Martin and we could be the best team up the middle in the NL.
Then, I would like to see Garland or Lowe come back as opposed to Sabbathia. It is a risk not to go after the best guy on the market, but I would want to save some of the money for Martin/Brox/Ethier extensions.
1 fair to say laa got the better end of that garland deal?
If Lowe pulls down a 2004 season, will your point wobble?
Just as with A-Rod, I really hate entering these bidding wars in which the winner inevitably makes a huge bet in which the entire direction of the franchise hinges on one player.
I think it's nice to think about Sabathia atop our 2009 rotation, but realistically, I view it as a longshot.
Best of luck to him
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3dmwky
Or were you thinking of the Canadian TV show with the title character as a leprechaun?
Yea, just thinking out loud. So, I imagine whether or not we extend Penny would depend on how his second half goes this year.
I personally would prefer to go short with someone like Sheets, Burnett (can opt out after 2008), or Pedro. It is one thing I really like about Colletti.
I think we have a good core of young pitching coming up through the ranks and a bunch of guys who have a chance to pull a Rich Hill and slot in to the 2-hole (Miller, McDonald, Elbert, Kuo).
If Lowe puts up a 90 ERA+, then wins the clinching game of 3 playoff series, I'll take that!
And my point will stand. :)
Most people look at his peripherals and say that, but that was said two years ago. Based on his numbers I would have to agree, but he just seems too valuable to trade right now. On the open market he is a $15 mil pitcher.
Yes it will, and it will stand taller then all the other points.
Hey didn't he leave as a free agent after all those heroics? Could we ask for anything more?
I still have hope that Sheets can put together a healthy year. It is kind of a catch-22 with him. If he is healthy he will end up getting a monster contract. If he fails to make 20 starts again then you probably don't want him.
Anyway... congrats to Ellen Harrigan!
eh
double-are
eye
gee
eh
en
spells harrigan!
Harrigan, That's Me!
Who is your friend when you find that you need a friend?
Harrigan, That's Me!
...
Who is the woman helps a man every time she can?
Harrigan, That's Me!
H- A- double-R I- G- A- N- spells Harrigan...
1. He's coming off a career year, his value is about as high as it can be.
2. He's had injuries in the past.
3. He's relatively affordable at 8 mil for 08 plus a team option on 09.
4. He'll want a big contract if he's healthy and productive, a contract beyond the 3-4 years we'd want to go.
5. We've been burned on Odalis, Carlos Perez, Dreifort, Ishii, and Schmidt. I don't think we throw money at Penny for the length and type of contract he would want.
6. If we pick up his option for 09 after a solid year in 08, he'll be upset at not getting more of his true value than the option year we'll be paying. That is not a fun situation to imagine, especially with a guy who can blow steam like Brad.
If we have a healthy Kuo and Schmidt this spring, we can consider moving Penny with Kershaw in the wings.
Say the Indians become sellers either now or in July. Would you trade Penny and Hu for C.C. if he agrees to an extension?
I'm strongly inclined to re-sign a proven player who wants to be here and is willing to offer something resembling a discount.
http://tinyurl.com/2hw35w
http://www.insidesocal.com/dodgers/archives/2008/02/that_was_one_lo.html
"... and let me tell you about these Dodgertown elevators."
I think those clauses are relatively common among crappy veterans. That's how we got Shea Hillenbrand last year, in a slightly different situation.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/20/pf/college/stanford_tuition.ap/index.htm
It's quite something that we're heading toward a world where people could be spending more on their kids' preschool than on their college education.
I agree with your overall premise, but I just don't agree with avoiding the FA pitching market just because we've been burned before. The key is to avoid signing crap. We didn't get burned on Lowe.
Also, Penny has a better track record of all those pitchers with the exception of Schmidt, who is a different case since he's been hurt.
Damn! 14 years too late.
OHH!! The first time I read that post I thought Stanford was simply not going to offer tuition to <100k families. It's the exact opposite.
Stanford offers the tuition for <100k families for free! This is a great story.
---
That Preschool line reminds me of the show "The New Adventures of Old Christine." You know how the little kid goes to a private school? Something about private school doesn't sit well with me, but the characters on the show make it rather humorous.
I can't imagine the Mar Vista public school system is that bad, anyway, can you?
http://daily.stanford.edu/article/2008/2/20/universityAnnouncesBoldAidPolicy
I remember that back when I was deciding between colleges, Stanford ended up being cheaper for me than UC Berkeley.
Agreed. 2008 will go a long way in determining whether Perez can pull a Pavano-like contract from some team.
I'd rather paint a number on the pitching machine and wheel it out there.
Let the Mets sign and overpay him, then they can pay for him to pitch for Kansas City before he gets a minor league invite with Washington.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/lee_jenkins/02/20/jenkins.torre/
Meant to put that in there.
BB/9
2005 6.12
2006 5.63
2007 4.02
I think signing Oliver Perez is as big a steal as a blind man stealing reading glasses from the 99 cent store.
NOTE TO MLB WORLD: THE DODGERS DON'T SIGN LEFTY PITCHERS NAMED PEREZ ANYMORE!
If that is the case and Penny is able to adjust to have a better second half, than I would be all for it.
One day I will move up to the top and get the thick envelope at home.
While I wait, I'm going to apply for Packers season tickets.
So if I understand correctly, tuition will be zero if you make $99,999, and $36,000 if you make $100,001. Seems like that would give families in the $101,000 range incentive to hire creative accountants, and families in the $99,000 range incentive to make sure no promotions come through.
I remember that back when I was deciding between colleges, Stanford ended up being cheaper for me than UC Berkeley.
You get what you pay for. :)
Starters
C - Martin - $3.5m (estimated as "Super Two" arb)
1B - Loney - $500k (3rd year)
2B - Abreu - $400k (2nd year)
SS - Hu - $400k (rookie)
3B - LaRoche - $400k (2nd year)
LF - Ethier - $2.5m (estimated as "Super Two" arb)
CF - Andruw - $17.1m
RF - Kemp - $500k (3rd year)
Total Starters - $25.3m
Bench
OF - Pierre - $10m
OF - Repko - $1m (2nd year arb)
C - John Q. Backstop - $1m
1B - Mark Sweeney Type - $1m
IF - Lucille II Type - $1m
Total Bench - $14m
Starting Pitching
Penny - $9.25m (option picked up -- I've seen this reported as low as $8.75m)
Billingsley - $500k (3rd year)
Kuroda - $10m
Schmidt - $15.5m
Kuo - $500k (3rd year)
Total Starting Pitching - $37.75m
Bullpen
Saito - $6m (1st year arb eligible)
Broxton - $2m (1st year arb eligible)
Proctor - $2m (2nd year arb eligible)
Brazoban - $1.5m (2nd year arb eligible)
Meloan - $400k (2nd year)
Seanez Type - $1m
McDonald Type - $400k
Total Bullpen - $12.9m
Chaff
Nomar - $1.25m (part of deferred signing bonus)
Loaiza - $375k (optioni buyout)
Furcal - $4m (deferred signing bonus)
Total Chaff - $5.625m
Total 2009 Payroll (estimated) - $95.575m
The Dodgers could certainly afford Sabathia or extending Furcal, but it's not like we have a windfall of cash to spend.
Three people from my senior class got accepted to Stanford. I had a higher GPA and SAT scores than all of them.
Sadly, I was not an accomplished offensive lineman like one of my classmates. Nor was I good at women's basketball. Nor was I student body president.
Poll question No, 1: Part 1, Who of the following will be a GM first, Logan White, DeJon Watson or Kim Ng. Part 2, Who of the above-mentioned threesome is the most likely to be the Dodgers next GM?
Poll question No. 2: Should Kobe Bryant take his doctor's advice and adhere to management's wishes and have his surgery now?
http://www.emma.cn/event_763.html
Whoever went to Stanford or any other top school had a better GPA and SAT score than me. My grades were good enough to get in to the local schools though for the one I attended, it took a personal interview to get past admissions.
I am NOT behind a deal like this, but a deal like that would have to be something like Loney and Penny for Texeria pending an extension.
Question One
Part 1: Logan White
Part 2: Logan White
Question Two
NO!
Lucille II - a Ramon Martinez aka veteran utility infield type.
CHAFF - are the contractual signing bonuses or buy outs.
#1: Part 1 - Kim Ng; Part 2 - Logan White
#2: No
I think I'd have a hard time convincing the wife to let me go to see practice baseball. If my children were older, it would be a family trip for spring break.
Jon, are you considering going?
Lowe is not under contract for 2009, nor does he have an option to be bought out.
But at least they got a good education for free.
I don't mean to sound all Alan Bakke.
Similarly, Ramon Martinez (utility infielder) is the second Ramon Martinez to play for the Dodgers (in recent memory anyway), the first being Pedro's older brother. Thusly, Ramon Martinez (utility infielder) has been bequeathed the nickname "Lucille II."
Chaff = trivial or worthless matter; extra stuff.
I did not apply to Stanford, but had a fun time at Berkeley with former high school classmates that Stanford rejected.
65 Apparently no one on the Dodger roster can send their kids to Stanford for free.
That would be awful times ten.
Ethier is no longer a kid. Rios or Wells wouldn't be much of an upgrade over him, and would cost more (in the case of Wells, ridiculously so); plus you give up the staff ace with a good contract for the next two seasons.
Also, my friend just linked me to this Fire Joe Morgan bit about Andre Ethier from two years ago, and it made me giggle. I'm sure most of you have seen it, but if not:
http://www.firejoemorgan.com/2006/08/best-ever.html
My son turns one on Saturday, cake with Mickey and Minnie.
That's the point. You don't trade Penny, unless it's for Sabathia.
Plus, we are set at 3rd through 2013! :)
1-White
2-None of them
or maybe i should suggest trade for griffey in case someone is observing my comments.
I assumed Rourke and Driver.
I was neither an athlete, nor a student body president. The process by which one gets accepted to a prestigious university is a bit of a crap-shoot, assuming you are above threshold.
I will gladly admit to any Cal fans out there that I would have gotten just as good a CS education there, though I'm very happy with where I ended up going. I definitely got more than what I paid for.
If the reds gm calls you and says ethier and penny for dunn would you do it?
No.
I sometimes think I can put on a Disney DVD for the kids and then go stick a few hundred dollars in a rat hole near my house and save myself a weekend of crowds and long lines.
But I'd do anything to make my children happy, and those silly people in those silly suits make them happy. I pull out twenties there like a drunken sailor at a strip club.
Brad Penny would only go if we got solid pitching in return I think. Selling him high is all I was thinking when I suggested it. I'm not shopping him, I don't think we are.
Remember last spring, when it appeared we needed a big bat and we had excess starters? Who had the bad half of 2006? Who got bombed in spring training? We would have traded him when his value was quite low. The premise of the whole thing is that his value is quite high now, it might be (stress might) the time to see what he could bring in return.
1) Arguably, he has already given the Dodgers a discount once (his deal looks like a huge bargain now, but it looked like a great value then too)
2) Living in LA has been a boon for his social life since he has a proclivity towards dating actresses
3) He is not represented by Scott Boras
2009 - $11m
2010 - $15m
2011 - $16m
2012 - $17m
2013 - $22m option ($4m buyout)
So, SD will pay at least 4/$63m, and at most 5/$81m, meaning they will save $17-$20m assuming the Sabathia standard.
More reason to:
(a) despise the Padres (jealousy)
(b) sign Martin, et al as early as possible
I guess I just don't see the hype with Rios. He's good enough offensively, and really good defensively, but Ethier & Pierre? Really?
It seems way to much to give up to weaken your pitching staff and we still live in a universe that thinks Pierre is a good player. Would Rios even play everyday?
I assume you mean the Grand Californian Hotel, the newest one connected to California Adventure.
Ha! Freudian slip to be sure. Of course I meant to but Ethier & Penny! :)
Same feelings here. I got into Stanford, but overall on my college applications I went 3-2-1.
Adam Dunn cannot be dealt without his okay before 6/15/2008 due to a full no-trade clause being triggered once his option was picked up and he also has a limited no-trade clause for the remainder of 2008 (allowing Dunn specify 10 clubs to which he would accept a trade).
But then I aimed for only local schools and two of them were pretty much a sure thing.
It would, provided Andruw can cover all that extra territory Dunn can't get to...
I was the kind of kid who was usually the best student in class when I found the subject interesting or worthwhile, but who would completely blow off classes I believed to be a waste of time. I guess I shouldn't have done that with biology.
Why wouldn't he? Is that really a huge concern?
I don't see any tendency of Torre either way. Here are the Yankees' CG the last few years:
2007 - 1 (T-12th of 14)
2006 - 5 (T-4th of 14)
2005 - 8 (5th of 14)
2004 - 1 (14th of 14)
2003 - 8 (T-5th of 14)
Is the gain from Ethier to Dunn enough to offset losing Penny?
Sure, I'd take Dunn's OPS over Pierre's. But I really don't want him in the outfield any more than I want Pierre, and losing a pitcher for him ain't worth it. Not with Jones, Kemp, Ethier, plus Young.
Counting on 350-400 IP from Schmidt, Kuo, Kershaw, McDonald, & Loaiza significantly weakens the 2008 team.
Counting on 175-200 IP from that group, plus having Penny at the helm of the rotation is a much better position to be in.
I don't know what the upgrade is from Ethier to Dunn in terms of wins, but I'd be shocked if it was much more than 1 win. Dunn gives back a lot of his offense, on defense.
One of their most famous alums was about to go down in his match play round today, Tiger Woods, 3-down with 5 holes to play, Woods after bogeying 13, went birdie, birdie, birdie, eagle, par, to win 1 up over J.B. Holmes (he's heard all the jokes).
My mother ordered me to stay home from school on Senior Ditch Day.
Ultimately, pitching beats hitting when you reach the postseason.
Some folks might argue that the Red Sox won on the strength of their superior lineup, but I think it had more to do with their pitching staff that gave up the fewest runs in MLB. Josh Beckett played a big part of that role.
It really won't matter because it's either Teixeira or Penny, and I'm pretty sure I have to go with the bat here. I like Penny, though, and even with his peripherals he seemed a better pitcher last year. (Maybe a mental corner?) So my league counts CGs and I remember a couple of times last year it seemed like Penny and Lowe should have been allowed to go on. As a competitor I'd want to be able to go for it, as an arm-chair manager I understand the caution.
Senior Ditch Day was the only day I missed an entire day of school.
I did use to ditch school, but at least I always showed up in the morning.
And he still has that same attitude today, evidenced by the fact he's failed out of UCSB twice already.
163 agreed.
I was also a Stanford reject, but I probably would have had a better chance of getting in if I'd spent more time writing my essays for the application (even then it would probably only be 50/50). I already had my heart set on UCLA, but decided to apply to Stanford and Harvard just to see if I could get in...which I did not.
I took AB Calculus in 11th grade. For 12th grade, I was in the next math class but I was pretty much at my limit. I dropped the class in October, despite my college counselor telling me it was a mistake. Maybe it was for the best, though.
You played handball during high school?
My guess is Molly will be their coolest one at her reunion, unless someone else made a fortune with their IPO.
But will you go to your 10 year high school reunion?
174 - Yes. But there was AB Calculus and BC Calculus, depending how advanced you were.
Thanks!
To quote Russ Cargill: "You ever tried going mad without power? It's boring no one listens to you."
In other news, I did not enjoy my high school years at all (well, some parts). But kids sure have to do a lot of stuff just to get into a good school. I had far more free time (and far more sleep) in college.
I got the "memory book" and I went through it and realized that I hardly knew anybody who was there.
I'll have a 20 year reunion in 2009. I went to 10, and it was a trip. I don't keep in contact with anyone from high school. The biggest running subplot for my class is whether Pete Sampras will show up. My money is on "no."
On the subject of handball, I seem to remember debating rule variations on a previous DT slow day (no slicees, no cross-countrys, etc.) My take was when you ban slicees and cross countrys, you're basically banning good handball playing. Far more controversial than the designated hitter.
Then you can forget it already. You're not going. :-)
You can always have two of my Loge tickets on either date but they are the outer loge and you should make sure your friends are game.
He was able to graduate and go on to college, etc.
Narcs would have a hard time with this wireless age.
3) A classmate of mine was arrested when they found a list he made of all the students he was going to kill.
2) Our student advise(who was a great guy), went insane and showed up at his ex-wife's house, poured gasoline all over himself and lit himself on fire. He died from the burns.
1) We had at least three students that slept with teachers, but one story stood out from the others. A PE teacher had an affair with a girl in my class. That summer he died of a heart attack. The family of the girl decided to sue the family of the PE teacher claiming that the teacher gave their daughter a STD that can't be cured.
I must have been a lot like Eric Enders, because although my GPA was somewhere in the top 10 - 20% of the class, I had the third highest test scores, behind only two of the three valedictorians in my class. That was more than enough to get into UCLA in those days, so I didn't apply to any elite privates. I wouldn't have survived my daughter's HS regimen and would have probably struggled to get into CSUN these days.
Only on DT.
I only applied to UCSD, UCLA, and UC Irvine -- and got in to all three -- and picked UCSD.
The TV movie "The Unwed Father" was filmed at ERHS (a grade 7-12 campus) for some reason. My neighbor, a senior girl, said Kay Lenz was "cool". My backside got a scant amount of screen time. That filming was the most exciting thing to happen there in my six years, by far.
If Andre Ethier got traded so Juan Pierre could start every day in leftfield, I think a bunch of people here will go to Dodger Stadium and set themselves on fire like a few Vietnam War protesters did.
I haven't been keeping track of good DT comments for a while. That reminds me I have to start again.
By the way, I was watching a Northern Exposure rerun last night, the one where Maggie is asked to be homecoming queen (speaking of high school). Her date was a very young Jack Black, in one of his first roles.
I chose the wrong profession.
Boy, self-immolation is cheery talk.
No wonder Greg Brock is never around.
The '70s saw several actresses who made a career of being victims/vigilantes in the TV movie of the week. Kay Lenz also starred in the TV movie version of "Carrie" called "The Initiation of Sarah," which also starred TV vixens Morgan Fairchild and Morgan Brittany and a young Talia Balsam of "Mad Men."
Two weeks later, the coach was arrested for statutory rape and fired.
It is always the PE and the history teachers so Greg is in the right place.
My wife's 1st husband was a HS football coach who married one of his students. She is no longer fond of football.
In her more recent appearances (Friends), I would accept your punishment.
I fear an Andrew F. reminder of something I once said that I will not repeat here.
And ever since I posted a story about that on the Griddle, it's been the top search phrase on Google to find the Griddle every month.
Except this past January when it was "GMAC Bowl."
I would have moved to Alaska if I knew a Janine Turner was waiting for me. Of course I would have had to go as a Doctor and that would have involved to much effort. It is easier to daydream and the results always favor the dreamer.
Don't forget, Morgan Fairchild was hot as Dottie in the movie within the movie in Pee Wee's Big Adventure (an "E Top 25"® movie).
Kobe should have the surgery. I envision a scenario where he stays healthy during the season but once the playoff starts, they start hacking his hand and they re-injure it. As someone said much smarter then I, if they can't win enough games to make the playoffs without him, they aren't going to be good enough to win the championship with him anyway.
I had a friend who, as a young teacher in the early-to-mid 80s, fell in love with a student. Claims he didn't date her until after he quit that job. I knew him as a very upstanding and honorable guy, so I believe him. I did meet her once - seemed attractive and nice.
The girls in my HS didn't seem interested in the teachers, except the young, longhaired blond english teacher. Until he married one of the girls' PE coaches.
He did the song, had the magic word, very funny. When I looked up the show on Wikipedia, I was surprised that they made only 45 episodes and Phil Hartman was only in the first season.
And it's pretty clear that Northern Exposure was the peak of Janine Turner's career in all aspects.
She also has done some risque roles. It was weird seeing the voice of Tommy Pickles as a prostitute in the Devils Rejects.
236 I loved that show. Also, don't forget Laurence Fishburne as Cowboy Curtis.
Cynthia Geary was a visitor in my apartment once.
I did not realize this until Northern Exposure came on the air and my roommate from my college days pointed it out to me.
In my opinion, Calvert DeForest had the best character on the show.
S. Epatha Merkerson, more famous as Lt. Van Buren on Law & Order, portrayed Reba the Mail Lady on the show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp7G18nQxvU
I think my favorite musical bit on the show was the intro for the King of Cartoons.
Just thought I'd pass that along.
There is also a moustache-less Jeff Kent with Maury Wills photo on Dodgers.com for those that are interested.
I mean Ricci is a very attractive woman but Trixie was waifish while Ricci is more, shall we say, curvaceous.
Just saying.
The Martin flanked by Loney & Kemp pic is cool.
Loved that movie. My favorite adaptation.
Off to watch the Clippers, why I don't know, I'd rather be home watching Kobe/Shaq.
The board seems strange without GB and D4P.
They will have to go to Stub Hub like the rest of us.
http://tinyurl.com/298sjp
Here are the Minor Leaguers that will report early: pitchers James Adkins, Brian Akin, Marlon Arias, Robert Booth, Jesus Castillo, Javy Guerra, Kershaw, Jacobo Meque, Miguel Pinango, Tim Sexton, Eduardo Sierra, Kyle Smit, Josh Wall and Cody White; catchers Alex Garabedian, Kenley Jansen, Jesse Mier, Carlos Santana and Matt Wallach; infielders Josh Bell, Ivan DeJesus, Blake Dewitt, Kevin Howard, Chris Jacobs, Francisco Lizarraga, Preston Mattingly and Russ Mitchell; outfielders Jaime Hoffman, Andrew Lambo, Exavier Logan, Anthony Raglani and Trayvon Robinson.
Among those not on the list is pitcher Scott Elbert, a 22-year-old former first-round pick who missed most of last year after needing shoulder surgery.
http://tinyurl.com/yvzfga
Don't read anything into it.
That was manager Joe Torre's response when asked why Andy LaRoche was grouped with the rest of the starting infield during the first day of drills on Wednesday while Nomar Garciaparra was taking ground balls with reserves.
Also, breaking news that Joe Beimel cut his hair.
Now I'm going back outside--it's clear here in Alabama too. Staying in the yard, though.
I guess I had a Simpsons quote that was too obscure for the group.
One goes: "There's a lunar eclipse tonight. Maybe we should look up."
Goon 2: "Nope, for me, it's solar or nothing."
http://www.snpp.com/episodes/BABF17
Ahh--wish I had the luck of Homer.
Well, there have probably been about fifty. Where should I start?
Crap, is it to late to proclaim my anxiety about the game!?!?
I probably won't get a return call.
about half way down the page and with pretty decent analysis they come to this conclusion:
Prediction: Kemp/Ethier platoon in right field, Pierre in left field.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8UUFA002&show_article=1
"Someone convince me there was a better basketball player than Kobe Bryant."
Well, there have probably been about fifty. Where should I start?
At first, 50 seemed kind of high. But, this is the kind of question/statement that began Bill James on the road to his Win Shares and his New Historical Baseball Abstract a few years back. If I recall correctly, he was talking with someone about Mike McFarlane being one of the 100 best catchers ever, and he decided to see if he could find out if he was.
I don't need to see Spawn of Strawberry.
By the way, I'm in favor of running a graphic on screen like the old Batman fight scenes (like "Wham!" or "Boffo") everytime Gasol does something good. "Pau!"
Haha, I've been thinking that as well. It would be a great marketing campaign on LA billboards even.
You mean you don't like Odom's missed layups?
Wow, it's as if Odom's ears were burning. He laid that one out for Amare to block.
Ethier's career splits
vs. RHP - .292/.361/.475
vs. LHP - .309/.343/.426
He's a little better against righties, but far from "abysmal" against lefties. Plus, Pierre can only dream of putting up a .769 OPS against any type of pitcher.
It's quite frankly amazing how many he misses. How could you be so skilled and have such bad touch on gimme layups?
Just when I try to root against Shaq he goes and does something to make me like him again! :)
Not only that but I think he was better against lefties in '06 & threw out his minor league career (don't take my word for it but that's what I've read in the past) regardless, Ethier is WAY better then Pierre NOT MATTER HOW YOU SLICE IT!
I know I should ignore this stuff, but the statement that there have been 50 players better than Kobe is one of those fire-starter inanities that drive me insane. He's probably not the best player ever. But by every conceivable measure, he's in the discussion. Rings. Scoring. Defense. Heart. And, if you don't trust your eyes, I'm sure he'd grade out as elite in all the statistical metrics you can think of. There are players who spark eras when, as fans, it's sorta the collective karmic duty to enjoy what we have. Kobe is one of those players. ...
316
And I still like Shaq, too.
vr, Xei
Still can't believe he is a Laker.
If I had to guess, I'd say Kobe's in the top 20 for sure.
Then he works on the next 45.
Phoenix
15 games vs. .600+ (8 at home, 7 at road)
13 games vs. the rest (6/7)
Lakers
10 games vs. .600+ (5/5)
18 games vs. the rest (11/7)
The Lakers only play 1 of their next 10 games against .600 teams, and they should get Bynum back right before they start playing more tough games.
Color this division purple & gold.
Ha!
I would say Kobe is certainly behind Magic, Kareem, Wilt, West, & Baylor, and that's just Lakers! But that doesn't mean he can't still be a top 20 player.
Being the 6th best Laker of all time is like being the 6th best Dylan song. It's still in the stratosphere.
Is that really true? He's like the Trevor Hoffman of the NBA. He might be a hall of famer, but since many think of him as such, he'll end up a HOFer.
Or why.
But there are players who have had careers as successful as Kidd's who are in the Basketball Hall of Fame: Calvin Murphy, Dominique Wilkins, Dave Bing come to mind.
Following up, here are the schedules for the other candidates for the #1 overall seed in the West:
New Orleans (37-15)
15 games vs. .600+ (9 at home, 6 at road)
15 games vs. the rest (6/9)
San Antonio (35-17, 2 GB)
16 games vs. .600+ (8/8)
14 games vs. the rest (7/7)
Utah (35-19, 3 GB)
13 games vs. .600+ (7/6)
15 games vs. the rest (8/7)
Dallas (35-19, 3 GB)
14 games vs. .600+ (7/7)
14 games vs. the rest (9/5)
Looks like the Lakers have the easiest remaining schedule of all the West contenders.
New Orleans: Lakers 1-1 against, play again 3/14 @NO, 4/11 in LA
Phoenix: 3-1, Lakers own tiebreaker
San Antonio: 1-2, play again 4/13 in LA (2nd to last game of season)
Utah: 2-1, play again 3/20 in Utah
Dallas: 0-1, play again 3/2 in LA, 3/18 @ Dal, 4/4 in LA
He was once a little green ball of clay...GUMBY!
I'll get you for this.
I bet that's Bill Walton's favorite animated show.
I remember when HBO was all Dream On and Not Necessarily the News. Those were the days.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08050/858672-63.stm
I thought I just had an epiphany that the guy from Dream On (Brian Benben) was the same guy as the dad on Aliens in America (Scott Patterson).
I was wrong.
I need to get me one of those.
And then give up using it after a week.
By the way, do I have to turn in my manhood license if I admit that I enjoyed watching the movie Music and Lyrics tonight? Better go watch me some UFC (grunt!) to make up for it.
Missed the Lakers game but the highlights were awesome.
It's payback for post 218 here:
http://tinyurl.com/yw5xz3
It's awesome, but I'm having trouble importing files from my old computer. The migration assistant isn't working because even though I have my old computer set to stay awake, it keeps shutting down after about 10 minutes.
I've then started trying to import files manually over the firewire connection, but in addition to the shutdown problem, I can't figure out how to do things like import my old saved e-mail, as well as get my verizon e-mail account set up on the new computer.
Any tips would be welcome.
Bud Black said, "In this day and age, 12 is pretty much the magic number with how your bullpen is set up and overall, the state of starting pitching and their length,"
http://tinyurl.com/2rpojq
- Sabermetric analysis of basketball tends to show that the two-point jump shot is the least efficient shot you can take. The shots that generally help to win games are layups, dunks, and three-pointers.
- If you're a great defensive wing, you're still a wing, and no matter how good you are there's no way for you to have as much defensive impact on the game as a great center.
That said, let's take a look at Kobe Bryant.
- Has three rings, but was not the best player on any of these championship teams.
- Has never been the best player on a team that won a playoff round.
- Scoring average of 24.8 PPG is twelfth all time, but this does not yet include the decline phase of his career.
- Is not a particularly efficient scorer. Has never ranked among the league leaders in TSP (true shooting percentage). His player efficiency rating has never ranked better than third in the league and ranks 19th all time.
- Has never finished higher than third in MVP voting.
- Is not a notable rebounder or passer.
That does not look to me like the resume of someone who is one of the handful of greatest players of all time. Without going too in-depth into the stats, I'll throw out the names of 21 guys who are almost certainly better players:
Michael Jordan
Hakeem Olajuwon
David Robinson
Tim Duncan
George Mikan
Bill Russell
Wilt Chamberlain
Karl Malone
Kevin Garnett
Charles Barkley
Magic Johnson
Bob Pettit
Shaquille O'Neal
John Stockton
Larry Bird
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
LeBron James
Julius Erving
Jerry West
Oscar Robertson
Elgin Baylor
I have to disagree about the defense aspect though. A center can generally just stand near the basket and react when guys come into the lane while also defending one-on-one when his player gets the ball, but it is much harder to guard a guy one-on-one on the perimeter considering there is so much more space to cover. A center may be more important in the overall scheme of team defense, but the difference between a shut-down guard and an intimidating low-post presence skews in the guard's favor I would think.
One shouldn't raise their nose at the fact that Kobe may not be one of the top 25 players in the history of basketball. To be in the top 50 is still quite an achievement. I would have a hard time arguing with Eric on his list. Not sure Barkley belongs or James at this point but I also would be able to add two players who should make the list. Kobe is an incredible scorer, but he's not a great shooter, or playmaker. Sabremetrics does exist in basketball. Hollinger on ESPN gets flack every week for stating that Kobe is not one of the top 5 players in the league. When you see what Chris Paul is doing it is hard to argue that Kobe is the MVP.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3256436
I don't have a problem with anyone who says Kobe is only the 25th best NBA player in NBA history. However, to say that he's merely 5th or below in the NBA right now is off base.
Eric Enders' list of "guys better than Kobe" is composed of mostly centers. If Kobe Bryant was 7 feet tall and played the post, maybe he'd have similar shooting percentages.
My point is, it's apples and oranges. Kobe is not going to lead in assists because he's a shooting guard. He's not going to win the shooting percentage title (is that a title?). I don't want to sound like those guys they lampoon on FJM, but when I actually see Kobe play, it's clear to me he's a cut above the rest.
It should also be clear to you that when you watch Chris Paul, Kevin Garnett, LeBron James, Dwight Howard, Amare Stoudamire, and Tim Duncan /Ginobili that they are also a cut above the rest. Just about every elite team has a player a cut above the rest. Kobe is right there, I think it is easily debatable if he is better then them. They all bring something different to the table.
Just to expound... ultimately, it's better to compare basketball players with similar basketball players. So for Kobe, it's more sensible to simply compare him with other shooting guards.
Metrics work better with baseball because you can't really get height advantages or speed advantages at the plate. If you can hit you can hit. If you can't, well, you're Juan Pierre.
I'd say right now that Kobe vs Chris Paul or LeBron James is very close. Dwight Howard is just amazing. So, to TC's point, there is room for a debate.
It's ridiculous for me to pick nits here, we're talking about an entire crop of great players in the NBA right now. I'd take any one of those players to be a part of my franchise.
Not trying to offend here but that is one of the most outrageous posts that I have ever read on this site IMO.
How many of those 21 better players have scored 81 points in a modern day game? The only guy that ever scored more than that was one of the most dominant centers ever and it was done in a whole different era of the game. There are so many facts and figures that can be argued about why each of those guys belongs on that list and why they don't that it's easier not to. I don't want anyone to think that I'm just using the 81 point performance as the sole criteria as to why Kobe is better than all those guys on the list but ask yourself this: will you, in your lifetime, with the game being what it is now, ever see a player score that many points again? The answer is more than likely going to be no, but that's not to say it can't happen. My point is you almost have to be one of the best ever to even accomplish a feat like that. I just don't see the likes of LeBron or Garnett ever doing anything close to that, or winning a championship for that matter.
http://tinyurl.com/2wyuce
I know, that's why I wrote this sentence:
I don't want anyone to think that I'm just using the 81 point performance as the sole criteria as to why Kobe is better than all those guys
If Shawn Green averaged 10-12 total bases per game, then he'd almost have to be in the conversation. But he doesn't. You can't cross compare baseball stats with basketball stats.
It would probably be too much to post the answers on here, but I have always found the Apple support forums to be extremely helpful. I imagine you could find all your answers just by using the search function in the forums, and you should be good to go.
Wait, this will work
for importing email: http://tinyurl.com/2pkqms
for setting up account: http://tinyurl.com/yj8t4n
Let me know if those don't lead you in the right direction.
The main problem seemed to be that importing large files like iMovies across the firewire cable from my old computer was causing it to shut down.
You're not being a smart aleck at all :)
My point in my initial post was that there are too may points to argue as to why this guy belongs as one of the greats and why that guy doesn't. I was just trying to illustrate that only one other guy in the history of the NBA has scored more than 81 points in a game. Obviously that was Wilt and he is generally regarded by all as one of the best players ever. To be in that company, you almost have to be great. Strictly opinion of course, but I hope that makes sense.
via Cap Punishment (http://tinyurl.com/28qvuq)
Iverson scores lot of points but he takes a lot of shots. Are teams better or worse for him being there? Having watched him play some I think he is a very good player but I don't think his PPG proves it.
It makes for great discussions though.
I don't have a real problem with anyone on your list, except maybe Lebron. He seems certain to one day pass Kobe, but hasn't yet.
Kobe's career scoring average is brought down by his 2 "development" years.
380 Yes Kobe is 3rd there.
Kobe has never been the best player in the league. Ever. It is complete Laker bias to say he's the best player in the league today. Sure he makes plays that no one else can make. Unless you watch Amare on a daily basis, or Ginobilli, or Bosch, or LeBron, or any other elite player. Kobe does not have the patent on incredible plays, some here only think he does but that is because the only basketball they watch is Laker basketball.
Do you think Bonds will find a job this year? Does anyone think that Bonds will find a job this year and if so, on what team?
1) BA/OBP/SLG for the 10 "regulars" on offense
2) ERA/WHIP for the starters and main relievers
Feel free to post in the comments here, or at True Blue LA -- http://tinyurl.com/2ry3m4. I will post the community average results shortly thereafter.
Thanks!
Probably wasn't meant to apply to slow, 5'8" 37 year olds with no hops, like myself. I can jack it up all night, and not make a dent in the scoring column. Check that, I probably can't make it up and down the court all night.
I'll suggest the following modifiction. Anyone can score points if they shoot enough, are left largely unguarded, and are not expected to get back on defense. Anyone already employed as a pro basketball player can score points if they shoot enough.
Kobe has never been the best player in the league. Ever.
That is complete opinion and I whole heartedly disagree. I for one, have the NBA package and watch all the western conference teams on a regular basis as I have done for years now. So I do get to see the likes of Amare, Ginobilli, Duncan, Nash, McGrady, etc...
While certainly all talented players in their own right, they do not possess the individual skills of Kobe. Nobody does IMO. All those guys are great at certain aspects of the game and make the guys around them better as well but Kobe is the complete package. He can do it all and he can do it all well.
Would he take a low paying contract to DH with lots of incentives?
Are teams going to blackball him because he is arrogant? By now we realize that many others have done PED's besides him and they are going play this year so why not Bonds?
I think the same holds true for basketball players or players in any professional sport. If you are going to base your argument on the "opinion" of players, that will fall on my deaf ears. If you want to use PPG, Kobe will lead the league. I will counter with PER which shows him the 7th best player in the game. We could do this all day, just as someone can point to Ichiro's batting average and say he is the best player in baseball, while I would point to his EQA and say, hold on a minute.
I hate how Kobe behaved in Colorado and in the aftermath. I hate how he treated some teammates. I don't like his ego nor his image. He is not a role model.
However, he is one of the best to ever play the game when you consider all the factors, talent and desire to win being the top two.
He is a great player and a winner, even if he also whines. Anyone who cannot see that is simply not being objective in my opinion.
Seriously, like Barry Bonds, he is unliked by many but a talent to be appreciated in and of itself.
I can't do that when the latest state of the art statistics say he isn't, and has never been the best player in the league.
So in this instant, I don't believe my own eyes.
I remember trying to shoot for teams, we usually ended up shooting for team captains because free throws are hard up until you turn like 14 or something.
I would like to see him go to the Yankees just to create the most absurd lineup ever.
So you measure a players worth/greatness in all sports strictly by what the latest state of the art statistics say, not factoring in you're own observations at all?
So you measure a players worth/greatness in all sports strictly by what the latest state of the art statistics say, not factoring in you're own observations at all?
What do yo know about him, now, that you didn't before?
"Garnett is very good, but if he had the pressure on him to score like Kobe does every night, there's a difference," said West. "Kevin is going to be a great, great player every night in all facets of the game.
"But the other one has a little bit different kind of cachet to him. You're going to pay to see Kevin Garnett play, but you're just going to see a tremendously good basketball player.
"The degree of excitement with Kobe Bryant is like going to an action movie instead of seeing a great film. Kevin Garnett would be in a great film and Kobe Bryant would be the action-hero figure. He's going to supply the jumps off the tops of bridges, dunks, going through 10 people, driving to make a layup.
"Kevin Garnett is just going to be the steady, steady, steady guy there every night. But I think from an all-around standpoint, Kobe is the best."
Now, Jerry West is biased, he traded for Kobe and remains in his corner during all of his past issues. But the man has seen more NBA basketball (nearly 50 years) and was a pretty good player himself.
Here are some other things to consider:
9 times All-NBA Team (1st Team - 5 times)
Only other contemporaries to be on more total All-NBA teams are Shaq and Duncan, Kidd has made the same number of 1st-Team selections.
7 times All-NBA Defensive Team(1st team - 5 times) Duncan, Kidd, Payton, and Garnett have made more All-Defensive teams.
Also, while Shaq was the dominant force on those championship years, there is no doubt that they don't win without the combo, Kobe destroyed San Antonio in the 2001 playoffs, he calmly made game winning shots in several of those games. Shaq won the Finals MVP in large part because the East had no one who could defend him and the Lakers rightly ran their offense through the Big Aristotle.
I have always wondered why Kobe causes such passion, there is often no middle ground, you either like him or hate him or at least have to point out his shooting pct. His assists per game are comparable to most shooting guards in NBA history (yes, including Jordan), he is constantly on the floor and he has shown that if he has guys who can produce, he will share the ball.
I think that most Dodger fans would agree with me. Bonds in a Dodger uniform? Never.
ToyCannon, you aren't serious, are you?
Yes, because I have come to realize that my own observations are clouded with prejudice.
I'd agree with you, pa, but if it happened it wouldn't be unprecedented. I'm still trying to erase Karl Malone from my Lakers Memory.
---
Yesterday, I think the consensus was that the Dodgers are set at almost every position. When was the last time this happened?
How would you rate defense up the middle now with Andruw Jones in CF? It seems fairly good to me.
That he was not unique in his desire to get better by whatever avenue was available.
Plus I've had three years of Jeff Kent so anything is palatable at this point.
Kobe - 5 1st team, 2 2nd team
Malone - 11/2
Kareem - 10/5
West - 10/2
Cousy - 10/2
Jordan - 10/1
Pettit - 10/1
Baylor - 10/0
Oscar - 9/2
Dr.J - 9/2 (counts ABA)
Duncan - 9/1
Magic - 9/1
Bird - 9/1
Barry - 9/1 (includes ABA)
Shaq - 8/2
Wilt - 7/3
Hakeem - 6/3
Mikan - 6/0
Barkley - 5/5
Havlicek - 4/7
Gervin - 5/4 (includes ABA)
Russell - 3/8
Moses - 4/4
Robinson - 4/2
Frazier - 4/2
Stockton - 2/6
Garnett - 3/3
AI - 3/3
Jerry Lucas - 3/2
Pippen - 3/2
Isiah - 3/2
Dirk - 3/2
Nash - 3/0
T-Mac - 2/3
Ewing - 1/6
'Nique - 1/4
Lebron - 1/2
McHale - 1/0 (I was shocked by how low this was)
Wade - 0/2
I'm sure I left a lot of people off.
Great post.
Wouldn't it be enough to just win the world championship?
Ok I can make that one better...
Win the world championship vs the Angels!
Ha! Good point.
From the core of my being, I despise Mr. Bonds. Why? That is complicated and perhaps irrationale, but it is honest.
Baseball is easier to measure and judge, due to the overwhelming amount of individual matchups. I'm not saying the new basketball stats are bad, it's just that I haven't been convinced yet. That probably says more about me than the stats, though.
I will say this though: Bill Russell is 105th all time in player efficiency rating. I vehemently disagree with that.
Michael Jordan
Kareem
Scottie Pippen
Amare Stoudamire
Lebron
Chris Bosh
Bill Walton
John Salley
Charlie Rosen
Just to list a few, and the majority of columnist around the country. excluding of course, the biased former Lakers, like, Jerry West, Magic, Byron Scott, James Worthy,etc.
Toy Cannon, ur eyes aren't deceiving u, he really is the best player in the league. u can't judge a player's greatness in basketball by being a "fantasy league" expert which to me is kind of evident in reading ur opinions. no offense, but kobe's individual superiority in basketball is a fact. not an opinion.
I don't think saying he's not the best basketball player in the league is hating him.
Many woman hate him because they believe he is a rapist. You might have to be a woman to understand that but I don't think so.
However it should still be easy to separate the man from the basketball player and the basketball player is a great player but not the greatest. Paul Gasol and the emergence of Bynum is what has put the Lakers back on the path of a championship team. Kobe is still Kobe, a great player who will now look even better because he now has a great team around him. If I put Kobe on the Hornets, would they still have the best record in the West? I doubt it.
Great stuff as always, BH.
John Salley?
I think the evolution of the game over the years has a lot to do with why basketball stats are not to be read as they appear.Your Bill Russell comment is proof of that I would think.
The game of baseball has been fundamentally the same for what seems like ages. Sure there have been trends of things through the years but the overall game has remained the same. The landscape of basketball and it's rules have changed dramatically over the life of the sport.
http://tinyurl.com/2dmqp3
35 Leon Powe, BOS 19.57
36 Paul Pierce, BOS 19.43
37 Josh Howard, DAL 19.42
38 Richard Hamilton, DET 19.27
39 Tracy McGrady, HOU 18.94
Clearly, PER is the best way to judge a basketball player
428
The answer is probably no. In all likelyhood his rating would fall with more playing time. Sample size applies everywhere as does the common sense application of analysis.
428
The answer is probably no. In all likelyhood his rating would fall with more playing time. Sample size applies everywhere as does the common sense application of analysis.
"I played because I was dedicated to being the best. I was part of a team, and I dedicated myself to making that team the best."
Because you know Garnett and LeBron and all those other elite players are never double teamed. Only Kobe, but wait he's triple teamed. Which would be strange because then you would think he'd have a decent assist rate.
That would be really fun to watch. I haven't attended a Dodger game with a player like that for a long time.
Do you mean you get a run if the ball goes over the fence in fair territory? I've heard tales of that feat, but I've always dismissed them as fairy tales told to little kids to scare them into becoming economists.
I agree with you; I was only arguing that Lebron's career to date isn't better than Kobe's, and he shouldn't have been on Eric Enders' list above.
I think that's because LeBron is surrounded by riff-raff and he has to be the one to make things happen. Kobe has talent around him which puts less pressure on him to put up big numbers every night. That doesn't necessarily equate to Lebron being better.
Molly: My feeling is, why wouldn't Andruw hit some Home Runs this year? I would be quite shocked if he hit less than 25 this year. If he did, the Dodgers could be a serious contender.
But I don't want to jinx it!!
If Andruw hit 25 or more, the Dodgers could be a serious contender
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.