Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Aaron Weisman was born April 5, 1908, and Sue was born April 7, 1910. They married in 1930. My grandfather passed away in 1994, but in addition to the 100th anniversary of his birth this weekend, we're celebrating Grandma Sue's 98th birthday, alive and well.
* * *
Go Sue!
Except, the infirmities kind of lost their infirmitiness when Heston showed that he could travel around to make speeches. If you can travel around, you can talk to a camera at your house.
For everyone out there who still have some of their grand parents living, go see them. When I was younger, I was too caught up in my own world to want to spend much time with my grand parents. Now, I regret the wasted opportunities.
7 I've got a great grandma. Out in good old Goldfield, NV. She still plays the slots like she's 21.
Go Grandma Sue!
I'm going to South Carolina to see mine next week, followed by a drive down to Jacksonville, where I'm hoping for a Minotaur sighting.
Swing up to Durham you might get a D4P sighting
I already know he exists.
I lost mine this past September. She was a huge Dodger fan, there's no one else who will ever be as fun to watch a game with. She swore to me that when Gibson hit the home run that she jumped so high she touched the ceiling.
Thanks again Jon, for topics that open things up for all of us.
You do the math.
I'm still wondering why she was so disappointed and felt compelled to post Gin Blossom lyrics that address infidelity.
Having something to hate makes one more fully appreciate having something to love
Not to shoot all of you down, but I'm thinking this whole mysterious substance on Jake Peavy's hand thing is a whole lot of nothing ... and even if it is a little bit of something, it's probably the same little bit of something that almost every pitcher in baseball is guilty of
My maternal grandmother lived with us for the last 20 years or so of her life (which I wrote about here on the anniversary of her 100th):
http://www.linkmeister.com/blog/archives/000218.html. She was a joy.
My paternal grandmother lived and died in Phoenix. She was a hard-core Dodgers fan from the moment they got to Los Angeles. She always listened to the game on the radio. I hadn't quite realized how much she loved the game and the Dodgers till I spent a summer there while in college.
I miss 'em both. I never knew either grandfather, but I was blessed to have both my grandmothers until I was well into adulthood.
I echo Marty above. Go visit 'em.
Hey, check this out: http://tinyurl.com/5g635t
Golfer's talking smack. Big name golfers. With a mild rule 1 violation, to boot.
Happy birthday to her tomorrow.
Lots in common with Gramma Weisman!
Only my mother's father is still alive of my grandparents. I'd like to say I knew the rest well, but the truth is: I lost one very early (maybe age 10); and, the other two while in college (one who I was fairly close to, the other who I never really knew).
Of course it means he has to question whether Howland is capable of winning a championship... yes, the only team to make the last three Final Fours.
Apparently, Bill forgot the old adage that defense wins championships. Strange, because you'd think Bill would be one who was all over that kind of cliche without understanding what it actually means.
Betemit can't play centerfield.
I understand that, but Ned turned around and paid big bucks for the kinda offensive numbers that disappointed him from Betemit, i.e. low BA, high SLG, high Ks.
Defense plays into the equation.
Is centerfield defense worth $18 million a year...?
http://dodgersims.blogspot.com/2008/02/dodgers-war.html
using 2008 ZIPS projections, Jones is worth close to 18 mil..
Ugh. That's probably what Ned was thinking.
I'm rooting for Kansas, but I have a feeling Memphis will win.
Hilarious.
Bennett: $2.49M
Pierre: $2.47M
Though I suppose if he plays enough games next to Pierre, the voters may feel he deserves two in one year, one for center field, one for left field.
Those are based on playing time estimates.
Doesn't look like Juan Pierre is going to play 60% of the time.
we know you hate Andruw Jones and we know you despise Ned Colletti, and we know at every chance you get, you are going to be a broken record about it.
Just let me know in advance so I can skip those posts.
But that's kinda my point: Betemit's defense was generally considered decent, and he had plenty of power. He also made almost no money. But Ned thought he sucked.
Pierre, LF
Furcal, SS
Loney, 1B
Jones, CF
Ethier, RF
Martin, C
DeWitt, 3B
Hu, 2B
Lowe, P
Hmmm.
All I'm trying to say is that I find it ironic that Ned paid big bucks for a player who's really not THAT different from a player who made almost nothing that Ned gave up on.
2007
Betemit (as a Dodger): .241/.306/.437/.742
Jones (as a Brave): .222/.311/.413/.724
I also don't think another day-off will hurt Kemp. He need to relax and stop pressing.
Torre said yesterday Kemp will play most of the time.
Ethier: .308/.438/.846 (16 PA, 2 HR)
Jones: .300/.300/1.200 (10 PA, 3 HR)
Kemp: .200/.200/.200 (5 PA, 0 HR)
Pierre: .250/.294/.250 (17 PA, 0 HR)
What about Jone's previous 8 seasons or whatever?
Career
Betemit: .260/.332/.439
Jones: .262/.341/.496
Dont understand sitting Kemp again!
This Pierre situation will be the team's undoing. Seriously, does he have compromising pictures of Torre? This is unbelievable.
(Betemit just ground out vs. Rays. 0 for 2 and a hit by pitch/run out trying to get to 3rd in the Yankees game on now.)
I had a rough week, but I'm ok now. It had nothing to do with infidelity, actually. Someone I know got drunk and got behind the wheel and drove into a tree and died. It wasn't his style, but he hadn't been making good decisions lately, I guess. I was just really disappointed, and anyway that Gin Blossoms song reminded me of him from when we were in junior high.
I'm getting the impression that Torre is only considering Kemp, Ethier, and Pierre to be in the "platoon", with Jones starting every day. But if Kemp supposedly needs to sit when he's slumping, why doesn't Jones?
Ethier does not appear to be in a platoon, at least not until he goes without a hit for 3 games. Also I get the feeling that we are not supposed to notice that Kemp is in a platoon.
Happy birthday Grandma
I was trying to find 2007 game logs for TCY that showed SBs allowed, but couldn't. I was guessing that his SBs allowed didn't matter much.
Yes, I know, small sample size.
With all these games against teams within what will be a tough division, the Dodgers need to win every game they can. If that means sitting Kemp, so be it.
And yes, I would much prefer to see Kemp in the line up, but if he's going to be hitting below the Mendoza line, we might as well showcase Pierre for a possible trade, until Kemp gets his swing back.
Can we look at how many runs he gave up on a game by game basis in relation to SBs allowed, when controlling for the number of base runners allowed?
With all these games against teams within what will be a tough division, the Dodgers need to win every game they can. If that means sitting Kemp, so be it.
This is part of your reasoning for for sitting Kemp? Pierre gives us a better chance to win? I suppose Hu gives us a better chance to win than Kent also.
ANYWAY, Juan Pierre huh?
101 - 18 stolen bases against him in games that he started and the Padres lost. (assuming my math is correct)
http://tinyurl.com/5d3wvc
Looking at the raw numbers, can't say how important the stolen bases actually were. Also, the numbers don't show how many times the opposition used the hit and run as part of the offensive strategy.
Yes, the three games Kemp has played this season have really demonstrated his ice-cold bat--might as well sit him the rest of the month. (Snark directed toward Dodger management, not against 94.
Hi Neal (from Robert)
I ran a quick regression predicting the number of earned runs Young gave up per game in 2007, using IP, H, BB, SO, HR, and SB as predictors.
Significant predictors:
H
BB
HR
Non-significant:
IP
SO
SB
Really? It would really make sense to sit the guy on your team, who is not already your best hitter, definitely has more upside than anyone on your team? It also makes sense to sit him not one day, but 50% of the time because he had a three game slump? You would play Young instead? The same Young who has struggled all spring and has one ground ball infield hit all year? Wouldn't starting Young also hurt this great plan we have to steal more bases against Young? It doesn't matter how you look at the situation, its a bad idea to sit Matt Kemp.
I would also like to say I do like Matt Kemp.
Wouldn't that statement be true if you replaced Kemp's name with Martin's?
And, if Kemp does not play today, or fails to get a hit in his one at bat, won't your statement still be true tommorrow?
120 - again, I said nothing about how often Kemp should sit. Only that it makes some sense to sit him while he is slumping. And again, I would much prefer to see Kemp in the line up, but there is a logic to sitting Kemp, that is the entirety of my point.
Technically yes, but the sample size would probably be too small to detect any "significant" relationships.
Nooooooo!!!
My Grandmother taught me so much.
She shared 2 season seats on the club level with some friends.
She lived to be 86 years of age and was very active until the end.
Of course, she would invite me to attend some games with her.
She loved to belt out, "Take Me Out To The Ballgame".
Also, I suspect that Kemp and Ethier will start all three games in Arizona.
Unghh... I was just thinking that.
So, I guess I'm hoping it's psychological.
Not that I'm complaining, but dang.
Sweet.
I haven't watched the games, but I'd be surprised if this didn't also apply to Jones.
Vasgersian just said DeWitt lined that out "to central."
I have a feeling he sits tomorrow, since they're pitching Loiaza vs Haren, so what's the difference anyway?
Sweet dive to rob Spicoli/Owen Wilson of a hit.
Right now it's annoying, but it's to be expected.
Nicer inning there for DLowe, with some help from the D.
>>Andy LaRoche traveled with the team to San Diego, in part to remain with the team and in part to be with trainer Stan Conte to rehabilitate his surgically repaired right thumb. Tony Abreu worked out in Vero Beach, where he was sent for extended spring training.<<
But his cast had come off I believe and he was catching flies in the outfield this past week...
And here comes Furcal, second at-bat in a row he performs the leadoff role flawlessly, but wiht an extra out in front of him to diminish the chances it will matter. Welcome to 2007.
201 UNSUBSCRIBE to DBacks Newsletter.
Curse you, Spicoli!
Obviously, it doesn't address what that is relative to other players, but it doesn't look obviously bad.
Hm, the DBacks lineup has produced 2 hits in Colorado today.
Nailed Giles at third.
More fun facts about Pierre - his line with 2 strikes: .266/.313/.318, 1956 PAs, 483 H, 92 BB, 27 Ks
Meanwhile, great play by Hu and DeWitt to take out the lead runner.
Bad news--Lowe is clearly getting rocked.
Andruw Jones .235/.589/.473 (~21% of his PAs)
Furry .303/.600/.433 (~20%)
Torri Hunter .309/.591/.530 (~16%)
Pierre .345/.643/.435 (~12%)
.303/.600/.433
230 is what I thought it was, but Pierre having a .643 OBP even with three balls seemed beyond his capabilities.
I mention this because I think somebody needs to talk to Brian Giles.
Wonderful.
Or were we talking about something else?
Or it also means, got at least one hit in each of those games.
The "safely" part seems a bit extraneous.
259 - heh.
Second best prospect: John Olerud.
I liked Olerud better.
AKA KKK
Nice, Derek.
Wait a minute... scratch that... seriously.
That aside, John O'Hara? Amazing.
Slappy McPopup lives.
I lost a friendship one time because a fellow baseball fan--east coast guy--thought Scully was a droning windbag who talked too much.
It's not that I didn't like the guy but, seriously, can you really hang out with someone like that? I can't.
How many were bunt HRs...?
Because honestly, I see 4 legit Gold Glovers on this team (Jones, Furcal, Martin, and Loney).
Talk about power, Ethier showed some power earlier today...
No? It's just me then? Good.
Getting picked off by Chris Young is pretty embarrassing.
Not from the 4+1 thread but the one before that:
"96. Bob Timmermann 2006-09-18 16:38:21
Juan Pierre for president!
97. overkill94 2006-09-18 16:38:50
Muscle man Juan Pierre just knocked one out of the park to make it 4-0."
316 Embarrassing, yes, but it was a good move, you have to admit. Not as embarrassing as giving up a home run to Juan Pierre.
I think its going to take a while fo get an offense going this year, and not at a park like this. But look at the bright side.
The Padres offense will probably never get going.
Meanwhile, wrong pitcher is getting chased in the 6th inning.
Also, I do hate the Beat LA chant. Though it'd be fun to hear at a Lakers-Clippers game or at a Dodgers-Angels World Series Game
Give that man $18 million! Stat!
Especially because it didn't fail.
Ah, there's the Bison, into pinch run.
I agree with Sweeney, but in no way should Pierre have hit. And then to waste Kemp as a pinch runner? Thats silly.
Pierre almost has no chance at the plate. Scouting has him played perfectly now - any line drive that a normal player hits that drops in front of an OF is an out for him due to how well they play him.
This Carmax poll is not at all biased. nope.
vs. RH .214 .287 .370
vs. LH .225 .298 .362
Like starting Juan Pierre half of the time?
like I said- deep breath, happy thoughts, young season.
Colletti needs to tell his assistant to tell Pierre's agent his client should count his money and shut up. No more pity starts.
garciapierra.blogspot.com
a) What third base decision? They have three injured 3bmen on the DL. He's stuck with DeWitt, who never played above AA ball and praised his play.
b) The Bills move the other night ended up being a mistake but they misjudged the wonky weather reports. I did think they made the right move not starting him.
c) You're judging the Pierre-Kemp thing as a platoon based on 7 days. He's already said Ethier and Kemp are the starters. Pierre could go another 6 days without playing.
Loiaza over Park, is that a bad move? What choice does he have - does anyone think Park is a good long term choice for a 5th starter I think we all feel, and Torre probably hopes for this too, that Kershaw could very well be the 5th starter by mid-Summer.
His in-game moves for the most part to start the season have been otherwise fun, other than the one move today and Billingsley coming in for a 1/3 of an inning the other day.
As I said, I also don't feel it's fair to get inflamed based on a manager's first week with his new team, especially after such a weird spring training.
That's just my opinion. You're entitled to yours, of course. But I'd hope for some patience. The season, as we all know, is a marathon.
Why isn't Jim Leyland fired after the Tigers first week? (Don't answer, it's a rhetorical question. ;-)
Now, let's see if the Dodgers can refrain from choking this one away here.
However, he's also just a better hitter than Juan Pierre, so he should've been pinch-hitting there. And also starting in the outfield, but that's another story.
I'm off to go watch and enjoy the rest of this game. Ciao all.
... The Billingsley move didn't beat him, the lack of offense did. And Kemp played in that game and went 0-4, leaving five men on base.
He's platooning Kemp/Pierre NOW, but we haven't even played 10 games yet.
468 Doesn't that happen all the time in the AL when you don't have to worry about PHing for the pitcher? :)
... Pierre had one at-bat in that game. The rest of the Dodgers went six for 30, with Furcal, Kent, Ethier, and Kemp going hitless. Those guys are far more responsible than Pierre for the lack of hitting in that loss.
If you PH Pierre with a right-handed batter to face a right-handed pitcher, you are showing up Pierre--humiliating him.
I don't mind Pierre hitting in that situation in this game because I think Torre is going to see that Pierre is the fourth best outfielder on the team and doesn't belong in the starting lineup. But to make that decision while showing up the player for all to see... I don't think it's a good idea.
That ship sailed a while ago.
dude, those types of bullpens should not be allowed, PERIOD.
Torre could be using the whole lineup, giving players a chance to show what they can do (and what they can't do) while making sure everyone plays.
Kemp is in the game. It's way, way too early to say that Torre has given up on Kemp any more than to say he's committed to Pierre.
Let's give this a little time.
We'll see what transpires from now on, obviously small sample sizes, etc etc.
I smiled.
Nasty pitch from the Blue Ox.
My opinion of Torre is not based on this week alone. In the past few years he has had some very good teams that he did little with.
Other than winning the division or wild card in each of those years. Each of the past 12 years, I believe. And the "very good" teams of the late Yankee period, 2004-7, had some major pitching issues, the whole Giambi situation, other injuries. They were beaten in the playoffs by some other very good teams, which happens.
I'm not saying Torre is infallible. But I discount a lot of the buzz against him. Yankee fans are ridiculously spoiled. It's amazing to me that the fans in New York have adopted Steinbrenner's attitudes about baseball, as if that's an intelligent way to evaluate a baseball team. The AL is tougher than the NL largely because teams like Anaheim, Boston, Cleveland, Chicago and Detroit made a concerted effort to catch up with the Yankees.
The Rockies' bullpen might be a source of some consternation for their fans, this year.
The Dodgers have lost twice all year to this point. The sky isn't quite falling yet.
I guess Torre did some great managing there to induce Raffy to fly up in the air like a magician.
Wow, thank you Raffy, for saving the Bull's hide there.
Thank you Raffy. Seriously, thank you.
If anyone's listening, just send the check to my home address.
Kent in for Ox. I like this. Go Torre.
Not that K, though.
Ouch.
still, got the run across, that's all that really matters
Seriously, if it's a platoon, I'll join you in your criticism. I don't think it is yet.
Hu da man!
On to Phoenix.
2 out of 3 from the Padres at PetCo, the Sammy Smile™ at the end, no Bowa meltdown, and for whatever worrisome things there are to think about, I'm pretty happy with dat.
Cheers, all.
Ah well, maybe SportsCenter will have it.
I still want to see CajunDodger post "Hu dat?"
It's there if you are using the MLB Gameday, not the Dodgerthoughts Gameday.
.
.
.
Nick Punto, I mean.
Boomer was asking if the Dodger could go the season with DeWitt at third.
2. Let him join the post-game Joe Torre interview scrum.
3. Encourage him to ask, politely, as only Jon Weisman can, "What does Pierre have to do to convince you he doesn't belong in the starting lineup?"
I love today's win. It's a classic NL West game, the likes of which we'll agonize through all season. All the more reason the Dodgers can't keep hurting themselves by putting an inferior lineup out there just to appease a depressed player and his anxious agent.
I realize Kemp is struggling, but his at-bats are an investment that is almost certain to pay off rapidly. Pierre's at-bats are just throwing good money after bad.
I wonder where Grandma Sue's baseball card photo was taken.
From the Times article on the just-concluded game:
There was plenty of pregame chatter about still images of Padres ace Jake Peavy that surfaced on the message board of a Dodgers fan site the previous night. The still picture was taken from Fox's national broadcast of the Padres' 4-1 victory over the Dodgers on Saturday, when Peavy held them to two hits in a complete game.
The images show a black substance on the thumb, forefinger, and middle finger of the San Diego Padres ace's right hand and didn't appear to be doctored, as it was part of a sequence that was included in a highlight video posted on mlb.com. The black substance was also visible on the video.
Peavy denied that he cheated.
"It's just dirt," Peavy said. "I pick up dirt. I mean, c'mon. I mean, seriously. That's funny to me, seriously."
E. Loaiza vs. D. Haren
C. Billingsley vs. D. Davis
H. Kuroda vs. M. Owings
Those last two should provide quite a contrast at the plate.
The most cryptic thing Torre did say, though, was this: "We were the visiting team yesterday. We'll be the home team on Friday [when Peavy should face the Dodgers again], so the balls that get thrown out of the game will come over to our dugout [instead of the Padres']."
Philistine.
Hu takes advantage of his opportunity and comes through big time for his team.
Kemp is back in for at least five games now, I hope it's thirty--consecutive--and he never looks back.
Pierre had his chance to produce today. Hu did, Pierre didn't.
Loney and Ethier continue to look excellent at the plate and in the field.
The Solution! Give Dewitt his due without qualification, he's doing it the hard way, he's earning it.
Re-sign Furcal now.
It will be years before Loney is picked off first again.
Martin is doing a fantastic job of handling the pitchers and running the defense.
He had much better at bats today too.
I will predict his days off until the All-Star break.
Thu - 4/10 - No Game
Thu - 4/17 - No Game
Mon - 4/28 - No Game
Thu - 5/8 - No Game
Mon - 5/12 - No Game
Thu - 5/22 - No Game
Thu - 5/29 - Road Game, first game vs. Mets
Wed - 6/4 - Day game at home vs. Rockies
Mon - 6/4 - No Game
Mon - 6/16 - No Game
Thu - 6/23 - No Game
Thu - 7/3 - Day game on the road vs. Astros
Sun - 7/13 - Day game vs. Marlins
Tue - 7/15 - Starts in the All - Star Game
After sleeping on the discussion of yesterday:
Kemp should start, give him 100 at bats to work it out--regardless of who the opposing pitcher is--.
Pierre is a bench player for this team.
I agree. He must be really bored going from A's clubhouse to White Sox.
I will dialed in.
If that's not 8:30 p.m. tonight, I will be dialed in at 8:30 p.m. each evening until you are on.
"Despite Juan Pierre going 0 for 4 with four flyouts, Joe Torre liked the plate appearances and will start Pierre against Dan Haren tomorrow in the Diamondbacks' home opener. "He had pretty good at-bats," Torre said. "He hit them at people." Torre didn't pinch hit for Pierre in a tie game in the seventh, choosing to use Matt Kemp as a pinch runner even though Kemp played the field in the bottom of the inning, sending Pierre to the bench anyway. Pierre is now batting .091, and Kemp is bating .125."
http://tinyurl.com/45zsva
I'm using whatever Gameday it is that Jon links to up there in the main post.
Virginia just beat North Carolina (12-11 OT) in the scintillating replay of a lacrosse game from yesterday. I stand by my stance that Virginia is overrated. One nice thing about following lacrosse at your own pace is that you don't run the risk of learning the result offhanded. Not like the stupid Final Four.
Fashion Alert!
It looks like Torre has found some of Grady's old windbreakers.
Joe was wearing one today.
He should get rid of those, it's not a good look for Joe.
Thanks for the heads up Jon.
It's just more of the same. I thought I was going to be able to relax and enjoy the season, trusting in Colletti and Torre to make the right decisions.
The most cryptic thing Torre did say, though, was this: "We were the visiting team yesterday. We'll be the home team on Friday [when Peavy should face the Dodgers again], so the balls that get thrown out of the game will come over to our dugout [instead of the Padres']."*
How is that "cryptic?"
I guess the Daily News must've laid off their thesaurus, too.
This better be them trying to shop him.
Thanks, I was going to mention that.
I wonder what Ned and Pierre's agent really talked about?
I refuse to let this decision chap my hide -- yet. I'll chalk this one up to "Torre is still learning the team, etc". Come May 1, hopefully this situation will have sorted itself out.
It never actually entered my mind that Ethier would be the lock everyday outfielder instead of Kemp. This feels like a sick, twisted joke where we clamor all winter for Ethier to play everyday, and when we finally get what we want, it's at more of an expense to Kemp than Pierre.
Andrew, did you just type Plaschke in that post to ensure he is (again) associated with the mark of the beast?
This thought is my calming moment. Ommmmmm
We are not hitting. However, we are working the count deep, as a team, well except for Kemp. He is swinging at balls and looking at strikes, that's how far off he is. For the hitters I know, the sure sign of breaking out of a slump is when they start drawing walks. Then they are forcing the pitcher to throw strikes, and getting good pitches to hit. They become correctly selective. Kemp, being a "talent" may have the hardest time adjusting to Easler's approach. Usually, that is something kids start learning at the age of 10.
During today's game, I was defending Torre against what seemed like an ocean of attackers (really just a couple of guys but it's more fun to choose an epic simile to describe an action that entails sitting on a coach, typing, while watching a baseball game).
I said that the platoon of Kemp and Pierre was no such thing, yet. I said that Torre will realize that this team is better with Kemp in the lineup.
I now realize I could be wrong.
Throughout the Spring, we thought it was Ethier vs. Pierre in LF. It was a given that Kemp would be the RF. Little did we know.
It's going to be sweet when BB-ref updates the Dodgers' page to show Pierre as the LF, and Ethier as the RF
That could take a few days.
Total Defensive Innings:
Left Field
Ethier 33
Pierre 20
Right Field
Kemp 33
Ethier 20
Also, here is the PA distribution among the 4 OFers so far:
Ethier 25
Jones 24
Kemp 16
Pierre 11
I can be in the Ommmmmm mode for a short time.
Really, for me it's more like, SERENITY NOW!
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/444891.html
What kind of pitching have the Dodgers faced this week. After scoring 4 runs in 5 innings against Zito, the Dodgers have scored 3 earned runs in 29.2 IP against the next 5 starters. What they have done is take charge against bullpens, even with the 7 inning bullpen effort by the Giants where where Lincecum was a reliever, still the Dodgers have done well against pens scoring with 12 ER in 18 IP.
The Dodger pitching staff has matched those good starts so far, starters with a 2.11 ERA (and aside from the rain delay game, each pitching 6 or more innings) and the pen with an ERA of about 1 (2 ER in 18.1 IP)
I think tomorrow's outfield will be JP, Kemp and Ethier.
Andruw needs a day off.
Just play Pierre every day for the rest of the season, and then wonder at the end why the Dodgers missed the playoffs by 2 games and couldn't get enough offense to compete in the NL.
Torre mentioned good at bats? What in the world does Pierre have to do to convince everyone he's a terrible hitter? Hit .000?
The silver lining is that Pierre isn't at the top of the lineup. Let's not be so quick to bash Torre. However, unless this kid gets traded, we might as well let the Plaschke's win and then prepare an "I Told You So" in September.
The silver lining is that Pierre isn't at the top of the lineup
Except for today.
Was that -- July 26, 2006 -- Steve's final post? If so, what a way to go out.
I tuned in late and assumed he hit 8th. He was at the top! Now I really give up.
Ahh the good old days... last weekend.
I didn't tune in until midway through the game, and heard one of Hu's ABs. Then Steiner said Hu-Lowe-Pierre were due up that inning -- looking up, it was the 5th -- and a familiar feeling of dread washed over me.
At least we won!
Torre: "We got a few potential all-stars here."
Colletti: "You really believe that, don't you?"
:)
Good win for the Dbacks, by the way.
Who's more traditional than Torre? Perhaps he is a member secret society that uses completely different criteria for judging players. A scale by which 0 for 4 is irrelevant compared to cabalistic measurements, akin to astrology.
Do you think Curtis Granderson makes that much of a difference?
Or, maybe Young or Repko will find a way into the lineup. If Repko were playing instead of Jones when Ethier and Jones let a ball drop in the rain, would there have been a collision?
But in the at bats that I have seen, he's pretty much a sure bet to swing at the first pitch, pitchers know the book on him is to just throw around the plate and then work the outside of the plate trying to get him to either take a third strike or roll over his wrists and hit ground balls to the left side, of his at bats, he has one fly ball to center, 2 singles, 6 ground outs (5 to the left side, 1 comebacker) and 7 strikeouts.
And he probably has averaged less than 4 pitches a plate appearance.
None of this means that Pierre should start ahead of Kemp. But he does need to have better at bats and not be in a such a rush to hit the ball 500 feet.
For Pierre, he is not showing anyone why he should be playing, at least Kemp hit in ST while Pierre has been cold since this whole outfield situation has been going on. At first I thought what Joe wanted to find out is will Juan Pierre be able to adapt to being a part-time player because if not, then he has to probably be moved.
Jones really is a feast and famine hitter, he never has been a BA guy but he will hit homers so you just have to wait on that part of his game to start.
Although I am a bit suspicious of Joe for using JP almost as much as Kemp, I know that the more Joe uses JP, particularly in the middle of the line up, the more horrified he will become.
The only thing that scares me is that if the Dodgers offense is perceived as weak because Jones and Kent don't perform well, this somehow falls onto Loney and Kemp's reputation. After all how many 10's of millions are Jones, Kent and even Furcal being paid to carry our offense this year. And how hard will other teams be trying to devalue Loney and Kemp so they can try to get them and pay them 500,000 a year.
That said, I'll make this meager defense of Pierre's 0 for 4 day... he managed to work the count a couple of times, and he managed to put the ball in play with runners on base. Unfortunately, everytime he put the ball in play, he hit it right at a fielder.
I would really like to see Kemp get a start tomorrow or Tuesday and hit for the cycle, drive in 7 runs, and score three more. Just so we can get back to having a real outfield.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.