Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Maybe I'm getting soft, but I actually didn't think it was a big deal that Juan Pierre started over Matt Kemp today. Peavy isn't exactly the best medicine for a slumping hitter. I'd still rather see Kemp play, but I just sort of wrote it off.
Certainly, though, there are others who feel more strongly about it. Ken Gurnick of MLB.com gets some quotes on the matter.
Joe Torre: Kemp will "play most of the time. I didn't think Jake Peavy was a good matchup for him."
Kemp: "I'm trying to do too much. I just need to let the game come to me. Shoot, I know I can hit. I need to get back to my game plan. I know what I have to do. I'm not worried at all. It's just my approach. I'm trying to get 10 hits and 10 RBIs in one at-bat. You can't do things like that. It's going to turn around real quick."
At the bottom of the story, Gurnick adds the following paragraph:
Pierre is making his second start in five games after losing the left-field job to Andre Ethier. General manager Ned Colletti said he received a call from Pierre's agent asking for clarification of his role and Colletti said he delivered a message that the better Pierre performed in the opportunities he had, the more playing time he was likely to earn.
That makes sense, of course, but again, again, again, Pierre needs to be evaluated relative to what is expected of the other outfielders, not in a vacuum.
The next call will come from his sweet, grey-haired mother who doesn't want anyone to be mean to her son.
I remember some bitterness by Karros but like the eagles song says "Anger is love disappointed" I don't hold anything against him for saying some of the stuff he said.
Tronsformer just came to me...I like that too.....
He's gonna be great this year.
!
And, how many games does one have to play to reason that Kemp is slumping?
You are getting soft. And I think your memory is too short as well.
There is no way to know that Kemp is "slumping" after 4 games. Kemp will always likely have a lot of strikeouts. Unless he turns into Bonds or Pujols, that's just the way heavy sluggers and walkers work. Torre sighting Kemp's 6 Ks in 15 ABs as indicating that something is wrong reminds me of the hated one's assumptions about Choi after he started with something like 10 K's in his first 11 ABs in 2005. I also remember talk about Choi needing to sit because certain pitchers were "not a good match for him." So instead we got Grabowski or The Bad Catcher playing first instead.
Just like Choi was always a lot better than the alternatives, Kemp is a lot better than Pierre - even if he is "slumping." There is no good reason to start Pierre unless Jones, Ethier or Kemp need a rest - a situation that, frankly, should be very rare.
It will be interesting to see how he does in the MPH department thrue out the entire season, I hope I'm proven wrong & he turns out to be even better or a good enough starter, I'm rooting for him.
I saw this at the barber shop today. One of the rare occasions that I venture out from the basement. It took be awhile to find the my way out, as I had to move several large piles of empty soda bottles, beer cans, corn chip bags, along with other sundry items.
Why did I even bother getting a haircut?
I was thinking Torre might start Pierre again tomorrow to utilize his speed against Young, with Ethier sitting until I checked Young's splits and noticed that Andre has an .846 slg. pct. vs. Young. Then I checked Jones: 1.20 slg. pct. vs. Young. Then I checked Kemp: 4 k's in 5 ab's. If Pierre does start tomorrow, it's likely to be Kemp sitting again.
It's kinda funny how our perceptions can taint our thinking. When I saw Young face the Dodgers 2 years ago he stifled us on 2 hits - both by Jeff Kent, but apparently those are the only 2 hits Kent has ever had against him in 18 ab's. Could be a good time to start Hu?
In the last thread you mentioned that every pitcher should know how to pitch to Jones.
Do you mean that the pitchers should show him fastballs outside, off the plate? That they shoud mix in breaking pitches for strikes only on the outside of the plate?
Is it true that if a right handed batter tries to pull outside curveballs that the result is usually a grouder to short or third?
Jones did go to the opposite field to drive in a run last night.
For the most part, when Jones does hit the ball, he is hitting alot of grounders to short and third.
... its also WORTH developing...
http://tinyurl.com/46x8b3
http://tinyurl.com/4zrb3y
It sounds as though Kemp knows what he needs to do to correct. Last year he was sent down and when he came back up, he had learned how to hit the ouside pitch to the opposite field--and with power--.
I am one of Kemp's biggest fans, but until he can show that he can make consistent contact, he should have his playing time limited. Baseball is a skill game.
If there is one thing that Pierre has shown over his career, it is that he will make consisent contact.
Yeah, I know. The Bison will get himself squared away. He just needs to recapture the feeling, so that he knows what it feels like to--stay within himself--.
As he is quoted above, it sounds like he recognizes that.
i'm with jon. consistent contact is meaningless. to use an extreme example to make my point, i'd rather have a home run and 3 strikeouts than 4 weak grounders.
The Dodger game really doesn't bum me out that much because, forget it Chinatown, it's Jake.
The other half of Ozzie wants Pierre so he can play smartball.
Okay, let's get 'em tomorrow! Chins up!
Happy evening.
Ok, let me clarify.
Loney and Either and Kemp have power swings.
By that I mean that they are short and quick from their release point with their hands and body to the ball. They are then extending and long out in front of the plate. They are looking to drive the ball, creating tremendous bat speed. Loney and Ethier strike out. They also hit the ball.
When they are missing the ball on their swings, they don't appear to be missing it--wildly--. The bat is usually, not always, but usually within a couple of bat barrels of the ball. They are--seeing-- the ball, recogizing the the pitch. This is one reason that "Crazy Eyes" is a good nickname for Loney. His vision is extra-extraordinary.
Kemp has shown that he can do these things too. He's just not doing them right now. He will though. He has some of the best coaches on the planet by his side to help him.
Just wondering if Pierre might be willing to re-structure his contract if that meant he could be traded to a team where he would start?
union wont allow him.
Exactly what Nate said, this isn't the NFL. Our only real chance of unloading him at the moment is to swap him for an equally bad contract, eat most of the contract in a trade, or include some young talent or attractive players so that the other team has an easier time swallowing his contract.
On a side note: Nate, do you still post over on the scout.com site?
I wish he'd do that more often, I don't have a chart of were most of his hits go but judging by his swing I'm guessing he gets most of his hits to leftfield or leftcenter.
I like the prospect and draft threads.
http://tinyurl.com/4emldm
Blake "Third Baseman by Default (though he's been doing a great job)" DeWitt.
Juan "Hat size 6 3/4" Pierre.
Rafael Furcal was "The Latino......" er, I can't remember that one.
James "Bug Eyes" Loney? Something akin to "Crazy Eyes" but different.
Anyone remember the others? I would've saved my Tivo of the game but wanted to erase all memory of it.
Jones's groundouts are always to the left side. His flyouts are random, his homers and singles are largely pulled, and his doubles are random.
That is a great observation.
However, baseball players do occasionally re-stucture there contracts, usually in the form of deferring large sums of money for payment at a latter date.
Arrangements like this might make moving Pierre more attractive to other teams.
In previous discussions, someone noted that one of the only reasons that Pierre or his agent would approach Colletti would be to request a trade--when a reporter asked Colletti if he had sought out Pierre regarding his benching--.
So I was just wondering.
2 IP
1 H
0 ER
1 K
0 BB
I just scoped out the chart & the dude has always been a pull hitter (I guess that's why he's never been a good average guy) based on that I'll be happy if he gives us 25+ dingers & a good amount of runs batted in plus good D & I'll be happy I guess. I did a little B-R research (don't know what's considered good) & found these RC (runs created) stats for Jones the last 4 years: 89,113,113 & 74.
Chris Young (very young, only been in the league 3 years)
2006 - 9
2007 - 82
Jim Edmonds
2004 - 144
2005 - 101
2006 - 59
2007 - 47
Willy Taveras
2005 - 69
2006 - 65
2007 - 57
Aaron Rowand
2004 - 97
2005 - 76
2006 - 53
2007 - 116
Ned: John Tyler? Ned Colletti here. I want to talk about Juan Pierre. He's been dividing his time between us and you. I cannot have that.
John Tyler: Well I don't know who he is but if you want him that bad I'm not giving him up that easily.
Ned: Oh is that so. Playing a little hardball huh Jonnyboy?
John Tyler: How about this. You give me Pierre, I convert your concessions to all chicken no charge. Instead of hot dogs, chicken dogs. Instead of pretzels, chicken twists. Instead of beer, alcoholic chicken.
Ned: How do you make that alcoholic chicken?
John Tyler: Let if ferment, just like everything else.
Ned: That stuff sounds great. All right. I'll have Pierre on the next bus.
"The latino godfather" Rafael Furcal
"My next door neighbor and carpool partner" Russell Martin
James "Popeye" Loney
Jeff "I should be collecting social security any day now" Kent
"Troy from West Virginia's biggest fan" Andre Ethier
"Man with the best cleats in the game" Andruw Jones
"...coming in with a hat size at a whopping 6 5/8" Juan Pierre
Blake "3rd baseman by default" DeWitt ("but he's doing a great job for us")
Brad "I don't know if I want to be a red neck or a Hollywood starlet" Penny
Penny really settled down after the 1st. I choose to look at the game as one the Dodgers won 1-0 over the final 8 innings. :)
I figured Pierre would start 1 of the 2 games this weekend, so I was mentally ready for today. If Kemp sits again tomorrow, I'm going to prepare my karosene for the angry mob meeting.
http://tinyurl.com/yqvsnh
If I were a SD fan, I would be worried about Edmonds covering the ground in PetCo.
I do think Pierre will go to Colletti and ask if he can work out a trade. I don't think Pierre will be a Dodger next season.
He was great in "Touch of Evil."
I was pondering this:
If Pierre were not in the picture--a big if, this is just a hypothetical--and Kemp or Ethier were struggling, would it be so objectionable if Young got a few starts in their place(s) while they regrouped?
Poor taste, yes. But also funny.
I realize that this was Pierre's second start this week, which is partly why so many people are in an uproar about it - and again, I understand it. I'm just having a lot of trouble getting worked up about it.
nothing against you RedDog but I don't like hearing Joe Torre talking like that, it's kind of like your high school girlfriend talking about her ex, who needs that.
Thanks Jon. I really feel like that too.
I just wish Kemp would go with the outside pitches when he swings at them or lay off of them, because today he was mostly just missing them.
112
After reading the SI article in the barber shop today, I got the feeling that the announcers were quoting from the same article.
It all looks better to me in context:)
I'm no apologist for Heston or anything he supposedly represented, but Moore didn't just badger him in that film, he sucker-punched him.
The first thing that I thought of when I saw the RIP was chariot races.
And how could I forget Soylent Green.
Makes me want to crack open a can of Soylent Cola in salute.
"Almost at the moment He died, I heard Him say, 'Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.'"
I thought he was completely not believable as a Mexican, which was great for that particular film because the bizarre casting actually reinforced the comic undertones of the film. I tend to think Welles did that on purpose. But maybe not.
I could never get into a lot of Heston's technicolor epics, like Ben-Hur, the Ten Commandments, or The Greatest Show on Earth. They simply haven't aged that well. They were notable at the time mostly for the spectacle, and we've seen so many bigger and better spectacles since then that the impact of the DeMille-type stuff is muted now.
My next favorite after Touch of Evil would have to be the damned dirty apes, I suppose.
That's how I'll remember Charlton Heston. On one hand, you couldn't help but feel sorry for him because he was an old man. On the other hand, he brought the badgering upon himself, and looked pathetic for not being willing to talk about his decision to promote guns in communities that had just experienced gun-related tragedies.
He did not come across well, and missed an opportunity to defend the guns he loved so much.
This guy is breaking down fast. No wonder Baltimore wanted to cash in...
James Adkins - 4 IP, 2 H, 0 ER, 1 BB, 2 Ks
He has a legit shot at making the 2009 pen.
- Dictionary.com
Heston was pathetic in this sense at the end of "Bowling for Columbine." Yet, like I said before, he willingly drew attention to himself, so it was hard to really think of him as an innocent victim.
At the risk of a Rule 5 violation, I can't agree Heston brought the badgering upon himself. Under false pretense, Michael Moore took advantage on an old man in the advanced stages of Alzheimer's. If Moore was looking for a meaningful dialouge about gun control he should have sought Heaston out five years earlier or the current head of the NRA. I have long been in faovr of gun control (although after two weeks in Israel I must confess I'm open to reconsideration) but Moore's tactics are scummy at best.
As for baseball, I have not seen one inning of Dodger baseball yet this season. I am really looking forward to watching today's game. (My lone post from Israel that the Dodger game was on ESPN was wrong. Schedule said it would be on. Instead the 2007 Strong Man Competition was on. ESPN loves the Strong Man stuff.)
First of all, I don't think "Heston brought the badgering upon himself" and "Moore's tactics were scummy at best" are mutually exclusive.
Second, Heston wasn't a bed-ridden invalid who sought above all else to avoid the limelight. He conducted voluntary, intentional, political acts that thrust himself into the public spotlight by (presumably accepting large sums of money...?) to speak at NRA rallies in towns that had just had a bunch of people killed by guns.
I don't think it was reasonable for him to then expect to retreat to his ritzy neighborhood and be left alone. He brought the attention on himself.
It's kinda like celebrities in general who expect to make millions of dollars from the public off the attention they draw to their movies, songs, shows, etc., but then expect to be left alone by that same public when said celebrities want to live a "normal" life. It doesn't work that way.
garciapierra.blogspot.com
Maybe Jon can start highlighting those announcements in yellow or something.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.