Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Newborn babies don't smile. They can be cute beyond all get-out (or not, it doesn't really matter), but they basically won't give you the time of day. You love them, you love them instantly, long before you get any tangible evidence that they love you back, or even like you.
And so, even if you're on your third go-round as a parent, you forget that they're capable of smiling. You grow accustomed to their alternatively stoic and sobbing approach to life. Happiness is defined as a dry diaper, a full belly or a secure swaddle. Happiness is defined as relief.
And then, about five or six or seven weeks in, the corners of the mouth turn up, and it doesn't quite seem like an accident. Maybe once every couple of days, then maybe twice in a day.
And then you come home from work on a Tuesday night, and the kid just can't stop smiling. His mouth is wide-open joy, his eyes are sparkling pools of wonder, and he's giggling from cheeks to belly. It's like a big practical joke "Had you going there, didn't I, Dad?" like the merry mobbing at the end of the silent treatment for Blake DeWitt after his first major-league home run, like the end of the morose Atlanta road trip and the reanimation of the Dodger franchise.
There is joy in Mudville. And the joy will ebb and flow, you realize you'll have winning streaks and losing streaks, tickles and tantrums. You step back and realize that you can do all you can do to win a World Series or raise a child, but you don't know what will happen come October, you don't even know what could happen come the ninth inning of a businessman's special in May, and your stomach curdles in anxiety.
Put that out of your head. Think about the smiles. "All I know is that life is pretty much a losing proposition," Josh Wilker says, "so it stands to reason you should celebrate the rare victories, however small." Focus on the smiles. Focus hard.
* * *
Today's lineup:
Juan Pierre, LF
Andre Ethier, RF
Matt Kemp, CF
Jeff Kent, 2B
James Loney, 1B
Russell Martin, you can't say you're surprised
Blake DeWitt, 3B
Chin-Lung Hu, SS
Brad Penny, P
Update: The reins have been pulled on Clayton Kershaw, who pitched one perfect inning of relief for AA Jacksonville today.
Here's Ken Gurnick's MLB.com update on Rafael Furcal:
Shortstop Rafael Furcal reported improvement in his sore back and pitcher Jason Schmidt's bullpen session went without incident before the Dodgers' game on Wednesday with the Mets.
Furcal missed his second consecutive start, but said with Thursday's scheduled off-day that he anticipated returning to the lineup for Friday night's series opener with the Astros. Furcal missed the last 12 games of last season with lower back spasms, but this injury is said to be in a different area and not considered by club officials as serious.
Not too often that the Dodgers have started all their outfielders 1-3 in the lineup.
Man, I hope Furcal comes back soon.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
And at the worst, create a phantom injury - perhaps a pulled pinkie, a bruised ego or something.
Okay, back to work for 40 minutes.
And now we return to your regularly scheduled Dodger conversations.
Still doesn't sound too serious, sounds more precautionary, but if he's out starting the next series, I'll start to panic more. We need our sparkplug!
It seems more cautionary to me, and he will get the extra day off. I guess I am glad he is not playing through the pain like last year. If he sits for the Houston series, than I will be worried.
7-year-old boy: Hits double, drives in three runs. Much rejoicing.
3-year-old boy: Wakes up at 3 a.m., gets drink of water. Immediately pukes all over me.
1-year-old boy: Wakes up at 5 a.m. with fever. Spends morning swearing a lot (in baby talk).
And yet I still disagree with Wilker's brilliant (as usual) line that life's a losing proposition. There's just too much good stuff going on. We win.
I thought I was paranoid.
Good grief.
If Penny can pitch his usual 6 innings, we can use Wade/Beimel/Proctor to close it out.
Wade needs to have another productive outing if he wants to hang onto his spot. Right now, he looks likes the most likely to be sent down when a move is made.
I hope the pews are comfortable.
Man, those Methodists have it cushy. Literally.
I guess there's a method to their padness...
does anyone have any idea on vloquez's pitch count. 7IP with 4 walks and 10 k's it has to be up there.
On the Hawai'i television front, I just turned on FSNPT and I've got the 9th inning of last night's game. Had I known it was going to be on, I coulda seen DeWitt's HR (and Alou's steal of home -- a Mets fan I know asked on his blog how that could possibly happen, and I took great joy in explaining it using DT as my source).
I am relieved not to see Fox Kansas City on that channel as I did yesterday. I have nothing against KC, but...
Gameday says 118 through 7 innings.
Mormon Thoughts
Church Thoughts
I'm definitely a fish out of water on DT today.
118 pitches through 7 for Volquez. Presumably he'll come out now.
And it's not even a cult or a sect or anything. (Well, maybe a sect, but they'd never admit it.)
I have said, "what are you doing?" many times to people touching my wife's belly without asking.
I am still laughing at the post last night about the nephew in the bathroom at Dodger stadium. Was it Marty? "Nice Shoes"
Hilarious
HR - J Votto 3 (7, 2nd inning off J Lieber 0 on, 0 Out, 5th inning off S Marshall 0 on, 0 Out, 6th inning off S Gallagher 1 on, 2 Out), A Dunn (6, 2nd inning off J Lieber 0 on, 0 Out), P Bako (4, 2nd inning off J Lieber 0 on, 1 Out), J Hairston Jr (1, 2nd inning off J Lieber 1 on, 2 Out), B Phillips (6, 5th inning off S Marshall 0 on, 0 Out).
Wherefor art thou, Sean Hill?
Meanwhile Barry Zito missed exactly one start, didn't pitch out of the bullpen once, and is starting for the Giants today in Pittsburgh.
Dewitt (5 years in minors): .279/.333/.444 .777 OPS 57 HR 329/146 K/BB 1859 AB
Laroche (6 years in minors): .294/.374/.522 .896 OPS 92 HR 282/212 K/BB 1698 AB
Laroche is just a much better player, period. You don't forget six years worth of data because of one month. Also keep in mind just how much luck plays a factor with so few at bats. Example:
Furcal 2008: .366/.448/.597
Pujols career: .332/.423/.619
Raffy has basically been as good as Albert Pujols with the bat so far. You think he'll keep that up? Or look at Cano.
2005) LD%: 20.6% BABIP: .318 BA: .297
2006) LD%: 19.9% BABIP: .359 BA: .342
2007) LD%: 16.9% BABIP: .329 BA: .306
2008) LD%: 17.0% BABIP: .155 BA: .157
Cano is not going to hit .157. He's obviously been tremendously unlucky this year. If you look at one month's worth of data it is easy to be misled.
Dewitt has the lowest line drive percentage of anyone in the majors with more than 50 at bats. Also no one (who qualified) in the last three years has been as low as Dewitt. He has a 8.5 LD%, where the next lowest is 12.9% by Gary Matthews Jr. last year! Of the bottom 11 guys, only one had a babip over .300 (and it was .303). Most were in the .270's or lower. Dewitt's BABIP is .348. If you think he is not due for a HUGE decline then you are very much mistaken.
Maybe this sounds like I am bashing Dewitt, but I actually like him. There is just no way he is going to be a good player yet. Every game he plays over Laroche once Laroche is healthy is a mistake. Laroche is just a much better player right now. On things like these you can't let emotions get in the way, you are hurting the team if you let Dewitt play over Laroche. Unfortunately, the Dodgers may just make this very mistake. Rant over. I need to start a blog for stuff like this. ;)
Yep, and my fantasy opponent started Zito and Maine today. I am hoping for carnage.
1-2-3 top of 1st 0 runs 0 hits
Or because that's just the way they say it.
For various reasons, the name got stuck to day games with the Dodgers.
I cannot vouch for 100% accuracy of the above statement.
Replace "outfielder" with "first baseman" and you're on the money.
Pierre: popped out to 2nd
Ethier: Fouled out to LF
Kemp: Ground out to SS
0-0 Top of 2nd
The same day Andruw Jones is hitting leadoff.
Wrong answer.
Correct answer: When he becomes an all-star.
Actually I agree, there are if one looks, too many good things to concern oneself overwhelmingly with the bad.
Tonight I get to go see my twin girls in their soccer game then head straight to my son's baseball game, then catch the Dodgers on DVR. Good times all.
http://tinyurl.com/4t6x45
Carolina Top 5th
Pitcher Change: Clayton Kershaw replaces Danny Muegge, batting 9th.
Aaron Thompson called out on strikes.
John Raynor flies out to center fielder James Tomlin.
Chris Coghlan grounds out, third baseman Russell Mitchell to first baseman Greg Jacobs.
Game is 5-5 in the ninth.
Thats the story with Penny now. Very few swings and misses. Eventually big leaguers will make solid contact if you throw enough pitches to them (and Brad really on throws 2 different pitches).
This is how he sometimes is in the first inning. Guess he delayed it for an inning. Might be good to settle down, Brad.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
Sure would be nice to not have to depend on bullpen for once in this series.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
Actually, I just checked the score. Maybe that's a blessing in disguise.
"... That was actually one of two ceremonial first pitches today. The other one was thrown out by Friday Night Lights star Aimee Teegarden, much to the delight of Dodgers PR staffer Mark Rogoff. Much to the chagrin of Rogoff, she requested Blake DeWitt as her catcher."
That last hit he gave up was just plain bad luck.
... It's now 5-0.
Nice screen name, by the way.
134 - Thanks.
vr, Xei
You'd think Vinny could remember the name of the guy on second. :-)
Either way, something like this was expected.
http://tinyurl.com/4ef5qg
I guess Gary Bennett wanted to be fresh to be able to play cards tonight.
James Loney, Gary Bennett and Scott Proctor will participate in a charity celebrity poker event from 6:30-8:30 tonight at San Manuel Indian Casino in Highland.
Other celebrities will include World Series of Poker champion Annie Duke, Shannon Elizabeth, Donnie Wahlberg and Sugar Ray Leonard and the proceeds will benefit survivors in Darfur, Sudan.
Thx, scareduck. So, to answer my question the answer is: both.
Bear in mind, Penny only has 6 career starts vs NY at home (4-2)
Whatever happened to Shannon Elizabeth, anyway??
Looks like a "bad Penny" day.
2008 - 1-0 going into today's game.
2007 - 1-1
2006 - 0-3
That was one of several not super impressive hits the Mets got off Penny today, but fair is fair I suppose. The Dodgers have had a few themselves these past coupla weeks. Oh well.
vr, Xei
I was gonna say we could still chip back at 5 in the bottom 5th, but man thats disappointing.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
Look, Torre's had a quicker hook for other struggling starters during this good stretch, and the bullpen's come to the rescue. If he left him in an inning too long today, I don't quite get the doomsday proclamations about what should've been done today. What should've been done is Brad Penny should've pitched better. Kuroda pitching better yesterday and sparing the bullpen a lot of work would have helped a great deal, too.
... He should have been pulled in the second or third. If it's obvious he doesn't have it, and it WAS obvious, then get him out of there early and you might still have a chance to win.
If there is a problem with the Dodgers sor far, they lead the NL in innings pitched by their bullpen. This is why, the Dodgers will need to carry 12 pitchers until the starters can show they can consistenly pitch deeper into games.
vr, Xei
Ugh, and Proctor's not faring too well either.
The Mets were bound to have a breakout game, the Dodgers were bound to have a bad one. This is ugly but you move on.
Why not let Young play a few innings, just to get him some field time?
Cant remember the last time Penny gave up 10 runs in a game.
Dodgers' Pythagorus is taking a beating today.
The bullpen is not tired, and there is an off day tomorrow.
vr, Xei
Well if nothing else the Dodgers have shown me that I do indeed have a job and have work to do and now I have no excuse to not do it. So off I go.
... Park and Loaiza have had adequate rest. If you're destined to be blown out, then why burn Penny for over 110 pitches? And if Park/Loaiza happen to have good stuff, maybe the Mets can be held for a time and the team at least has the ability to make a game of it and perhaps win.
There's no excuse for Torre's move, or rather the lack of a move.
http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/bqmS
He hasn't really been throwing hard all year.
Question, on Dewitt's bases loaded single, how was that scored, ground ball or a line drive?
I ask because I honestly can't fathom Dewitt's low LD% because I have seen Dewitt hit a lot of those type of gb/line drive balls.
Judging between what exactly is a gb/ld/fb is bordering on subjectivity.
THIS GUY.
Was it though? :)
(Last time I say so, so as not to incur a Rule 8 violation)
It's U-g-l-y, we ain't got no alibi.
I think we should make like the Metsblog the first two games of this series and start sniping at each other and wondering if the season is over.
No, strike that, reverse it.
Back to work.
... I give up. Apparently the only "logical" thing to do is to run Penny out there for high pitch counts, while watching him get absolutely hammered for more runs than he's ever given up before. Anything otherwise is "not thinking long-term" and "internet sexy", or whatever 223 was going for up there.
It would but the subjectivity of scoring is going to be marginalized the larger the sample size gets. Does anyone have Dewitt's line drive rate from the minors last year?
Having him face the pitcher with two out in the fifth and 104 pitches under his belt is defensible. I might have taken him out, but I can see the other side of it. I don't know why he was left in after that to face Reyes, but that's only one batter that you can't explain.
I agree. Penny just needs to stop sucking and pitch like the staff ace. He needs to regain his velocity back.
Had the Dodgers showed any sign of scoring today, maybe Torre manages differently, he did last night but John Maine is a better pitcher than Nelson Figueroa.
Yeah, 252 I'm more worried about Proctor lately. He's had some good innings and some really bad ones so far this season. The Dodgers will have other relief options as the season wears on but he's kinda important.
No, really, back to work, I swear. Starting now.
I tried to defend him earlier in the year, because although his numbers aren't great, he has been seemingly better when it counts, than he has in mop up like this.
What was Penny's highest velocity today, btw? Anyone know?
Probably about the same today.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/LAN/LAN200406250.shtml
vr, Xei
If Peter the Great were playing in the NBA, would he be starting at the 3 or the 4?
What about Charles de Gaulle?
244 Sorry, hadn't checked yet, but Edinson did keep it going. I expect that we'll see him in the All-Star game.
vr, Xei
You guys saw that Young is in at 2B and Bennett in at C?
Washington could have played the 5 in his own era, but he would be way undersized now. I suppose he could be a Dave Cowens or Alvan Adams type center.
See if people could have settled their differences by just playing one-on-one on the schoolyard, America would have had Alexander Hamilton for a longer period of time.
Seo - No
Hamulack - No
Baez - No
Lance Carter - No
Mark Hendrickson - Yup but he be gone now
Dessens - Nope
Maddux - Nope
Proctor - Maybe, Maybe not
I don't see how giving small men even more of complex is something that would benefit mankind. As it is, we only have gravity on our side when it comes to the benefits that small men have over tall men.
That's quite the Rule-13 violation-inspiring list.
Not sure but he could probably put up a great deal of resistance on defense.
Yup, plus we didn't waste our prime 07:00-10:00 time. Unless you want to watch the replay tonight.
Doing laundry will be such a pleasure. Perhaps I will live blog that experience on the Griddle.
Didn't you listen to Penny's grandmother? She said you never take Brad out after a bad inning. It just makes him mad.
I guess we know whose ancestors were ringleaders in the Whiskey Rebellion now.
Guess my prediction for that yesterday was a day late.
They are hoping there will be no sinking of Maine in this inning.
Man, that's awful. I'm clearly loopy from lack of air today.
I'd like to say something, ah, creative to him. Something like...
I'm open to suggestions.
The Mets already were resting starters.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWgpGVGeL_g
1st Mike Marshall - Dodgers
2nd Andy Messersmith - Dodgers
4th Don Sutton - Dodgers
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/LAN/LAN200707170.shtml
Mark Hendrickson was on the mound for the Dodgers that day and gave up seven runs in three innings, all earned.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PHI/PHI200708220.shtml
http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/2001/B07281PIT2001.htm
May 1, 1973:
http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/1973/B05010SFN1973.htm
Those were the biggest deficits overcome with 2 outs and nobody on in the 9th inning.
I keep trying to tell people that rule on my Softball team for Friday nights. They still throw their gloves. One of these days it will turn a single into a triple.
Excuse me, the latter is not a case of a team scoring 7 with 2 outs and nobody on.
Just the former.
And then lost 19-17 in 10 innings.
https://griddle.baseballtoaster.com/archives/350988.html
Wow, that second game goes to show how bad walks can be. Only 3 hits that inning!
The Lakers, in far more important games are 5-3 thus far, they won their first LA title on the latest date an NBA playoff game had ever been held to that point.
I doubt they are yelling Druw.
That is embarrassing
They also might have been saying "Ruuuuuuu-dolf".
Dodger Stadium has been a den of booing since the Fox people took over. It's extraordinarily disheartening to me.
I tend to ask people why they are booing at Dodger games.
It all started when they traded Piazza and made Dodger fans root for players they couldn't stand like Sheffield and Brown.
The cancer from these two players then spread from the clubhouse to the bleachers and is now ingrained in anyone who started going to Dodgers games before the trade.
Only those who went to DS pre-Piazza trade are immune from the effects.
It is whispered that only a Dodger World Championship can cleanse the poison.
Except Marlins fans because they are nonexistent.
I'm fairly certain at some point, they yelled MVP later on that evening.
I'm too young to remember numbers, but I remember my dad explaining that he wanted alot of money..
Q: How does a Marlin fan's booing go?
A: Boo-echo, echo, echo.... Boo-echo, echo, echo...
355 It could also be related to more anger burbling up in our society in general these days, but that's a whole 'nother topic to broad to go into here.
I used to feel that way about Luke Hochevar until it was pointed out that his greed gave us our steed.
Er, two broads walk into a bar.
Er, speaking of which, I have to walk out to a meeting now, and perhaps it's just as well.
Except in their own estimation, I've found.
And then separately, when Piazza was booed as a Dodger.
That is because they are not hanging onto those smiles like Jon suggested.
By the way Jon, it is to bad your excellent post got trodded on by such a bad game. The smile when you get home should wipe out any bad taste the game gave you this afternoon.
I don't have any kids but my cats are usually happy to see me. That works for me.
Cardinal fans were pretty much normal fans and acted like everybody else until Peter Gammons anointed them in the 1990s as the "best fans in baseball." Then they started to believe their own press clippings.
Late breaking news per Dodger Talk
And maybe this is why no Loiaza today, Dodgers have place Estaban Loiaza on the 15-day Disabled List, retroactive to Sunady May 4th, means that the first day he could come off the Dl would be May 19th or 20th (I can never get that straight).
Right now, I would expect to see Brazoban make the move since Torre has hinted that he would be next in line but the 17th looms out there.
Still, I'd better see some smiling kids when I get home.
That trip to the doctor's office stunk, but . . .
My cover story for you would have been more fun.
I'm counting on it.
370 - Nope.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
I was happy to see a number of Dodger fans (including myself) give Maine a standing ovation when he finally walked off the field in the 9th. Even though as a Dodger fan I was happy to see the CGSO broken up, I have to give credit where credit is due. Maine pitched a gem of a game and was deserving of being recognized, regardless of the color uniform he was wearing.
Olney:
Juan Pierre has always been an old-school free-swinger, someone who hacks first and asks questions later. But in the first five weeks of his season, there has been a dramatic change in Pierre.
"He's picking through pitches," said one talent evaluator. "I think with the competition going on" -- with four Dodgers outfielders competing for three spots -- "he had to re-think a little bit the way he was playing. In the time I've seen him, you can really see him trying to get on base, in a way that's different from in the past. There's a deliberate thought process going on there. His at-bats look different."
That's because they are different, so far. Entering Wednesday's game, Pierre is averaging 3.67 pitches per plate appearances, more than a quarter of a pitch better than the 3.40 pitches per plate appearance he averaged last year, and he is hitting .316, with a .388 on-base percentage. He's never had an on-base percentage of greater than .378.
FJM:
So you're welcome, Juan, for inspiring you to change your approach and revitalize your career.
Next up: Bill Plaschke turns his back on Juan and accuses him of playing too much like a computer.
and 391 that plaschke comment is classic, and probably going to be in the paper tomorrow hah..
>> "I felt a little fresher out there today," McDonald said about his seven-inning outing. "There was a little more life in my pitches, and my arm was feeling good.
"The key was getting ahead of hitters and throwing strikes. I used my fastball and tried to use the four quadrants of the strike zone, going high and low, inside and out." <<
http://tinyurl.com/5ac894
http://tinyurl.com/44bp6u
Here's the flavor: "And none of the above is even remotely meant to suggest that blogs ought to be banned. On the contrary, bloggers are certainly entitled to their often uninformed opinions, sometimes based solely on information gathered by the working press with far more access, sources and scruples than most of them."
Sigh.
Hilarious.
>> LaRoche hit .318 (7-for-22) in six games with Double-A Jacksonville and is batting .238 (5-for-21) with two home runs and four RBIs in seven games for the 51s.
"Hopefully I won't be here very long," LaRoche said. "As soon as I get my timing, hopefully I'll be back up at L.A." <<
## A couple of his throws to first base were low, though, and LaRoche said his thumb is still not 100 percent healthy.
"It's all right. It's coming along; I can get by with it," he said. "It's not 100 percent, but I can swing OK and I can throw the ball OK." ##
%% The 6-foot-1-inch, 225-pound slugger also sprained his left big toe in a recent game with Jacksonville and said it will take three weeks to heal. %%
http://www.lvrj.com/sports/18721304.html
http://tinyurl.com/4nk9uq
Bucs win!
I think we need a word other than "blog" because that word really makes people say ridiculous things.
I know you obviously have other work and stories to write, but I was just kind of curious as to how much time you get to go to games. The blog is great, I love spending Dodger games in the thread, keep up the good work.
Consistently at 95-97 on the gun, with far better control.
404 - Thanks. For better or worse, I have a job and a family that prevent me from going to Dodger games very often these days.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-zelasko8-2008may08,0,5180886,full.story
I've dreamed of working with the Dodgers organization in some way, whether it be through PR or some position that isn't automatically filled by ex-players or managers. My godfather took on sports writing in England, covering Stoke City football, and later English football in general. One thing he told me was that when he began working for the team he loved so much, work and pleasure didn't mix especially well.
He felt he lost that joy of being a fan when his team became his job, so I sort of wondered if becoming a sports writer almost took you away from being just a fan.
If you're willing to work for low pay for a while and move around a lot, a career in baseball is easily yours!
And if you want to work for the Dodgers, you can look forward to capricious firings.
I work for the government. I look forward to paperwork that allows me to be capricious.
1) Yeah, last Tuesday DeWitt has the best fielding percentage in MLB. What does he have now? 18th best, among guys with 100 innings or more. There is no reason to use a stat which dates from last Tuesday instead of today, except that the more recent stat doesn't support your argument as well as you'd like it to. This is an egregious example of a cherry-picked stat. It is, to paraphrase Vinny, using a stat like a drunk uses a lamppole -- for support rather than illumination.
2) Even if DeWitt were still leading in fielding percentage, the sample size so far is still small enough that it's highly affected by randomness, and conclusions cannot be reliably drawn from it.
3) Even if sample size were not a problem, fielding percentage is a near-meaningless stat in the first place.
4) LaRoche has not been given enough playing time in the majors to draw conclusions from his play one way or the other.
5) Also, what little playing time has gotten came while playing through an injury.
6) Even so, his play in the majors cannot remotely be called "poor." His lack of power made him arguably -- arguably -- mediocre, but not poor by any stretch of the imagination. He played good defense at third base and posted a .365 OBP. Of the six guys who played 3B semi-regularly for the Dodgers in 2007, this was the highest OBP -- and a good 40 points better than everyone else except Betemit.
7) While LaRoche's propensity for injuries is certainly a strike against him, it has no bearing whatsoever on the question of who should be playing third base when both DeWitt and LaRoche are healthy, which was the question under discussion.
8) You give DeWitt credit for hitting in the supposedly difficult eight spot, but give LaRoche no similar credit.
9) DeWitt's performance has certainly been laudable so far, but there is ample reason to believe -- indeed, it's virtually guaranteed -- that it will drop off. His past doesn't indicate this kind of ability as a hitter, and his line drive percentage, which is the worst in the league, indicates that he has not taken the proverbial "great leap forward," but rather has simply benefited from a lot of good luck. This is not to say that DeWitt shouldn't get credit for what he's done -- he should -- but the Dodgers would do well to realize that there is very little chance it will continue.
10) The quote marks in your reference to "Laroche's 'superior' minor league career" indicate that you do not believe it is actually superior to DeWitt's. The numbers have been stated earlier in the thread, so you can seek them out, but they show that LaRoche's record is not only superior to DeWitt's, but vastly superior. They're not even in the same ballpark.
11) "There's tons of highly touted minor league players with great minor league stats that can't make the jump." -- This isn't really true. Players who have reached the high minors and put up the kinds of numbers that LaRoche does usually are highly successful in the majors. The players who "can't make the jump" are generally either a) Players who played well in the lower levels of the minors but fizzle out at higher levels, or b) Players who put up numbers that are misleading for one reason or another, such as advanced age or playing at altitude. LaRoche fits neither of these categories. Once a player reaches the AA level and dominates, he is extremely likely to succeed in the major leagues. This is amplified by the fact that in LaRoche's case, the glowing scouting reports match the numbers.
Ok, I swear I went thru this thread and saw Nothing about Loazia going on the DL.
http://tinyurl.com/4ukruy
Personally I can't wait for LaRoche to prove people wrong. There does seem to be an anti LaRoche camp for whatever reason. Me, well I don't know, but what I do know is he at the very least was just as good as most of his peers while playing together who we all think could be all stars (loney, kemp, martin) and thats in black and white. And I go on that with a passion and truly do not understand why someone who just watches baseball for fun would write after 93 MLB AB's that he stinks but more power to them I guess. It would benefit the Dodgers most if both were great players.
I always use this to claim that someone will perform well in the majors, but I really have no evidence to back it up.
There came a Saturday morning that I wasn't working, just hanging out with the kids. I looked at those three kids and realized what I had been missing. I never got home any later that six pm on a week night again and very rarely did anymore weekend work.
You step back and realize that you can do all you can do to win a World Series or raise a child. Is there anyone in the world who is more fortunate that a child who is wanted and loved by both a mom and a dad?
Boy hit by Prius says he couldn't hear it
http://tinyurl.com/5m223e
It's kind of a let down that Micah Owings is only 1-3 with a double.
NPUT
{416} It's too late and my eyelids are too heavy to respond to everything, but I find it humorous that you quote Vinny about how a drunk uses a stat like a drunk a lamp pole --when actually, it was Vinny who was endlessly drumming that best fielding percentage stat into my head over the air. So, apparently, he was cherrypicking himself.
Your last point is quite debatable: just off the top of my head there's Drew Henson, the Yankee phenom third baseman who couldn't make it. Lots of guys come out of nowhere, and maybe this is the case with DeWitt, or maybe it's his 15 minutes. Or it could be fifteen years. Also, what's the difference between 'mediocre' and 'poor'? I have nothing against LaRoche, nor am I related to DeWitt -- I just want the Dodgers to win. It just seems that every time LaRoche is given a shot either injuries or performance or a combination of the two hold him back. I mean you can gripe about DeWitt's line drive stats etc. and call him lucky and the sample size too small etc., but the fact is he's getting it done and we should be glad for that. LaRoche will get his shot as soon as DeWitt goes into a prolonged slump, then we'll have a better idea. Unless Garciaparra nudges both aside, which would be a shame.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.