Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Part of the reason we keep seeing players like Gary Bennett and Luis Maza in the Dodger starting lineup and Russell Martin at third base has been Joe Torre's loss of faith in Chin-Lung Hu.
From Kevin Pearson of the Press Enterprise:
Torre said that infielder Chin-Lung Hu, who was hitting .200 and in a 2-for-17 slump heading into Friday's game, was clearly fighting himself mechanically and that it appeared the game was speeding up for the rookie. Torre said that Hu needed to be playing every day and that moving him back to the minors was something the club may be forced to look at in the coming weeks.
Hu might be heading to Las Vegas soon, but at least for today, he is getting a start in place of Jeff Kent.
Juan Pierre, LF
Andre Ethier, RF
Russell Martin, C
James Loney, 1B
Mark Sweeney, DH
Andruw Jones, CF
Blake DeWitt, 3B
Luis Maza, 2B
Chin-Lung Hu, SS
Hu needs to play every day. Hu gets opportunity to play every day. Hu gets benched for Luis Maza.
That is some Murderer's Row.
I have to agree that foul pop that Sweeney got doubled up on last year to end a game was one of the most agitating plays of all time...
http://tinyurl.com/4q9krz
And yet we survived.
We saw Brett Tomko and Mark Hendrickson start games last year.
Three years ago I said Furcal would end up in CF in the last year of his contract. Obviously I was wrong, but I still believe that it could be a good place for him. Not that CF is easy on the body or that we know he could read a flyball or would be excited about moving off SS. But I think it will only get harder for him to keep his back healthy as he moves into his 30s at SS. Again, he is not a fundamentally great SS, far from it. He relies so much on extraordinary athleticism. That's harder on the body and can show up big time as age erodes some of that athleticism.
Andruw also was that way as a hitter -- definitely not a guy with great technique or a great approach, relied very heavily on great athleticism.
Dick Stockton is compared to Max Planck more often than Einstein.
I was at that game. Kemp was on deck. It took awhile to sink in that the game was over - no one could believe what had happened.
This lineup is laughable.
Am I only the only person already thinking about 2009? No Kent or Nomar to placate with PT, no Sweeney or Bennett? And maybe, maybe, no Colletti?
I really didn't think he had the stroke, strength or hands to do that back in April.
Stellar.
Nice way to come back into the lineup though, Solution!
I wanted to use THIS TEAM IS SELF DEFEATING, but we have a 2 run lead so...
Yes on all points.
1.) Needs power and wants to give Kent a rest. Makes logical sense so why is JP there and not Kemp, if it is a matter that Kemp has had a few bad days and you want to rest him against a tough pitcher wait till tomorrow.
2.) If that is still so important that you have to sit both Kent and Kemp, something on this club I think should never happen, than how about a start for Young at 2nd base-you give a player just like Sweney some extra AB's and you can still play Hu at short or Mazza, if you want to give Hu more chances, which actually makes some sense fine, but on a team which has little power on its best days and scores runs only through multiple hits, making these flawed line-up decisions hurts everyone, and doesn't even accomplish your stated goals.
May you could do now. If Bennett refuses assignment, then May goes back down and whoever can be added?
57 Gee what a choice, the Alley-ooper or the Ground to Third Baseman Missile.
Hmmm, Hu got on base.
Chin-Ling Hu? Chin-Lung Hyu?
or maybe he's just swinging at bad balls?
Yes.
How about Young or Kemp?
I don't know but I hope so.
Lowe
A.Jones (CF)
Kemp (RF)
That's my outfield Dodger all-stars.
Your loyalty to Jones is very nice, but wouldn't it be fun to give Young 100 at bats?
I wouldn't be appose to that.
How would you feel about receiving that package if you were a Rockies fan?
And Dewitt is taking the Hanley Ramirez path to the majors.
Do nothing in the minors, then all the sudden put it all together in the majors.
You'd want Pierre and Lowe?
He might be good someday, but right now he's a bad fielder.
This inning sort of sums up the season as to why we're a middling team.
So? Why we talkin bout practice? This is a game. Making any play in practice is easy, especially for a major leaguer.
we need to practice patients right now.
Dodgers are playing with fire if they trot him out for one more to face the top of the Halos lineup.
It's Kuo time.
Kuo for the 5th, 6th, 7th, then Brox/Saito.
sprinkle in those ingredients & WA-LA!, we've got victory!!
Ugh.
Good work, Santana. And good work, Dodger organization.
IMO.
15 Ks
1bb
2 runs.
Loney ranks really badly in most defensive stats right now, but those numbers don't mean anything in a small sample size.
Totally agree, so how do you cure it? Or can it be cured
Kuo's been lights out.
Easy fix, just have Bowa stand next to Jones in the batting cage and yell full force on each swing that Jones takes, "QUIT STICKING YOUR BUTT OUT BEFORE YOU MOVE YOUR HANDS!"
Hopefully an ice sculpture or two.
One other note, Karros whatever his flaws are as an announcer, his analysis of Jones problems have been excellent, especially seeing him open up at the plate. I have to think it is frustrating for everyone to see this and know he isn't going to have his PT rationed because of his contract. Many people on this site thought that with the way Torre handled JP in the spring and set up the outfield everyone wanted, with only 40 games in the season-the whole outfield situation has blown up-that makes me bitter
It had to be a perfect throw and with 2 outs and Hu coming up it was the right play to send DeWitt
At the moment it would seem that Hu could use full time at bats in AAA when Furcal comes back and Maza takes over the role as Kents caddy.
The Maza man is making more in per diem money then he ever made in the minors.
DeWitt again
And isn't it amazing how screwed up Fox thinks the older male species is.
I can go away and leave you with the cranky group if you want.
And the answer is yes. Yes, he is. A terrible announcer.
As long as the Rays take their viagra they should have no problem.
They don't even have a finishing move.
Sit down Casey
They could call them Hot and Cold. Or Fast and Slow.
Or Good and Not Very Good At All.
I guess Chicken Little will need another day to do his little song and dance.
Kuroda is not impressed with how good Broxton is.
I only buy vitamans that are endorsed by Marvel characters.
Is your AC working today?
No, you cant pitch yourself into a save situation
Now you have been type cast.
Amazing how Hu's little hands could make the transition from glove to ball for the final out.
I always love a subtle ad campaign.
I was just thinking that, when the talk of Holiday came up. This team still needs more power, and I think Loney can be a big trade chip if packaged properly. Assuming Ned is not involved in the discussions we could make room for Tex next year while moving Kent to First this year.
Pierre
Loney
Hu
McDonald
Meloan
For
Holiday
#33, DeWitt is announced as the player of the game.
Martin had a great game.
Maza had a great game.
Park had a great game.
Kuo had a great game.
Ethier had a good game :)
High five!
>> LaRoche, Xavier Paul and Danny Ardoin each had two of the 51s' seven hits. <<
http://www.lvrj.com/sports/19040064.html
My sarcasm detector's needle has redlined.
They rarely happen within your division, and you don't want to give up much for a thirty year old. There risky--look at Jones.
You could try and develop your own, instead of putting them on the bench or the minors.(Kemp,LaRoche)
>> Brad Penny has been scratched due to stiffness in his right arm, and Derek Lowe will move up a spot in the Dodgers' rotation and take his place for Sunday's series finale against the Angels. <<
http://tinyurl.com/5rwxlj
http://www.softbankhawks.co.jp/team/player/detail/00.html
Feel bad Park didn't get a chance for a win, given how well he pitched. Some bad defense behind him sped his pitch count up and that was that but at least he battled out of it and unlike yesterday they didn't lose because of an error two. (Loney with the Sweeney throw there.)
But some nice clutch hitting and baserunning, and solid pitching, and victory is ours -- for at least today.
Btw, I didn't read all the comments -- only skimmed the earlier ones -- but didn't it seem like DeWitt's homer was legit? Karros kept saying the Dodgers got a break and it looked like Scioscia had reason to complain and so on, but it sure looked like it went over the wall, and a fan dropped it. Isn't that the rule?
Thru the magic of Tivo I watched it a few times even after the replay.
Anyway, great to get the win. Hope Lowe can be effective tomorrow.
See y'all manana!
from http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=280517103
"Dodgers manager Joe Torre thinks Ethier is the most emotional player in the dugout during games. "He's my Paul O'Neill," Torre said, alluding to the former Yankees outfielder. "When I first took over the Yankees, I heard how selfish Paul O'Neill was. Then I realized that people's idea of selfish was that he wants to get a hit every time up. That's how I see Andre Ethier. He takes his [frustration] out on equipment, as did O'Neill. One time I told O'Neill, 'Do what you want -- but if you get hurt to the point where you can't play, I'm gonna kill you.'""
Torre apparently needs a 12 man pitching staff so he can handle the bullpen poorly.
Who is going to start in Cinn on Monday? Will he start Bills with short rest? Loiza should come off the DL on Sunday.
With Penny and Lowe not 100% what is Ned going to do?
So many questions, so few answers.
Ethier really is Paul O'Neill!
I dont know what it would take to land Dunn, but I this Dodger team still needs a bat.
Actually playing Kemp -- the best healthy position player on the team -- and something like a .320/15/19 player in his last 130 games, might also help.
I would like to set June 1, 2008 as the exit date for Jones and Kent giving the Dodgers two weeks to find a second baseman and allowing Kent and Jones two more weeks to prove they will make a big enough contribution to justify not giving more experience to Kemp, Ethier, and LaRoche.
Same should go for Lowe and Penny.
What they also need is for more consistent starting pitching, which they've started to get the past few games, and better defense. Not sure how Dunn helps either.
Well done Greg
We need to just embrace Kent and Jones as slumping players who will come around. They're not "done." Torre can send Hu to the minors after Furcal is activated - that's probably wise. But in return we should get LaRoche. It is so so so time. DeWitt and LaRoche can platoon. I suspect Nomar will be injured for awhile, so his status shouldn't even be entered into the calculations. I'd rather see DeWitt or LaRoche flail a bit at second or short than any other scenario, including Adam Dunn (who would play where?)
When O'Neill was on the Reds, he was the guy I never wanted to see come to the plate with runners on. He always, unfailingly, scorched the Dodgers
Amen
Stand dowon
Anyone know if it was the same situation for today? Those walks are very uncharacteristic of him for this year.
But that stuff happens...
Nice to beat the Angels on national (or at least regional-national) TV to boot!
We need a Venn diagram to solve the problem for us.
358 Inego Montoya: "I do not think it means what you think it means." No but seriously, I think that would be a sad, empty little diagram.
I
You know what though, I really hope Penny just needs a little extra rest, I'm sure he'll get back on track.
http://6-4-2.blogspot.com/2005/07/adam-dunn-scouting-expedition-reds-7.html
On a lighter note, the solution was huge, Chan Ho and Kuo gave us solid innings, and there is reason to be hopeful considering we just beat ervin santana!
good day, good game, lets hope Lowe is on track tomorrow
vr, Xei
Okay, it was in AAA, Las Vegas, but it was the Dodgers' own AJ Ellis. Three cheers for AJ "I can do that, Bennett" Ellis.
All of Bluebleeder's previous misspellings were deliberate, Joycean puns! The man is a genius!
We know this because in comment #363, Bluebleeder knew enough to do this: "...time & time again Seaben (sp?)..."
When has Bluebleeder ever used "(sp)" before?
Even "Seaben" is sort of funny, given his stadium's proximity to the Bay.
"That is one of those things that is just instinct. Russell did a good job staying in the rundown," Pierre said. "Scoring a run without getting a hit, that is what I like to do. I like to make things happen."
Pierre's not a bad hitter; he's an out-of-the-box thinker!
A perfect season for Pierre? Hit .000 and lead the league in runs scored. It's just crazy enough...
It's also frustrating that the mainstream journalists who have direct access to Torre and Colletti never seem to ask them the obvious questions, and the commentators on TV hardly ever discuss them either. If it's so obvious to us, why isn't it obvious to them? Either they or we are stupid and wrong, or else there's some sort of unwritten pact that reporters are never supposed to ask obvious questions that might show up the management. Is that what it is? Are all the reporters that get to ask them questions employees of the team, and told to lay off? ALL of them?
Why don't they play Kemp and Ethier every day since they're the two best OF hitters, especially with Furcal down? Why did Kemp sit today? Why was Sweeney DH rather than Kemp, or Young? Why keep playing the dead bats, day after day? Why isn't any reporter asking these questions and putting them on the spot?
Can we hope that the vets are being given every chance to make good, and that the day will come sometime in June when Torre says "Enough"? I guess we'll find out. We musn't forget that the ballplayers are human beings, and the manager will have a feel for when it can help the team in the long run to let formerly good players have a bit of slack. but sooner or later, there has to come a point when enough is enough. I don't understand why no one is forcing them to answer these questions.
Sweeney was DH today because Torre wanted to give him some at-bats since he will rarely start ahead of Loney. I'd guess Torre will say that he needs Pierre to bat first right now with Furcal out and that he still needs to get Jones at bats which means Ethier or Kemp would sit and Kemp has been down recently and has not hit well against RHs this year.
I am having a hard time understanding why these posters allow LaRoche's potential to outweigh DeWitt's proven performance.
But let's talk potential. True, this year's Baseball America Prospect Handbook did rank LaRoche second and DeWitt fifth. But read what it said about each. It describes LaRoche as a "slightly below average defender with a solid-average arm." It rates DeWitt as "an adequate defender with a solid-average arm." It describes LaRoche as "a below average runner with unexceptional range defensively." It rates DeWitt as a 35 on a 20-80 scale for foot speed. Both are rated as good hitters. It says that DeWitt "has a smooth, repeatable lefthanded swing that creates consistent hard contact and enables him to keep his hands inside the ball. He can let balls travel deep and get enough extension to drive them out of the park. His pitch selection and plate discipline also contribute to his above-average feel for hitting."
Some scouts worried that DeWitt would lack sufficient power to play third base in the bigs. They said the same thing about Loney. Results refute that concern for both players.
The idea of sending the Dodger's current best hitter to Las Vegas and bringing up LaRoche is absurd.
But it does make sense to start playing LaRoche at second base. Kent is currently two for 33. Let's give LaRoche a shot there, once he establishes his game at Las Vegas.
Why put LaRoche at second rather than DeWitt? The team tried DeWitt at second in the minors and it didn't work out. DeWitt has won the third base job. LaRoche didn't hit with the big team last year, though he did have a nice OBP, and never hit in spring training. He also seems to be injury prone.
Some posters seem to believe that because LaRoche has a brother in the bigs and his father was a good MLB pitcher that he should be our third baseman. Is this some kind of ancestral divine right? I don't get it.
Keep The Solution at third. Start playing LaRoche at second in Las Vegas, then bring him up when his bat starts to heat up, and put him in Kent's spot.
And just to clarify, DeWitt currently has an OPS of .933. LaRoche's OPS at Las Vegas is 1.110, with an OBP of .515. Is that considered heating up?
Two things:
1) The idea is not absurd at all. Laroche is the better player. This is the opposite of absurd.
2) No reason to send Dewitt to Las Vegas right now. There is room for them both on the roster today. Matter of fact, this three game series with a DH would have been the perfect time to have them both in the game.
Indian Jon, you say LaRoche is the better player. Based on what? The only important factor is performance in the big leagues.
Finally, unless we are willing platoon DeWitt and LaRoche at third, or send DeWitt to Las Vegas, or play LaRoche at second or left field, there is no need for LaRoche on the roster at this time. We simply do not play enough interleague games to justify bringing him up just to play DH.
Again, what is wrong with working him at second base?
Finally, PhillDodger, I have a hard time getting excited by somebody's OBP, especially when it is achieved at AAA. LaRoche hit .226 for the Dodgers last year but that poor showing is supposed to be overshadowed by a good OBP?
And, Marty, you're probably right. The Dodgers will probably put DeWitt on the bench when Nomar returns. That would be nearly as absurd as sending this .324 hitter to Las Vegas.
Dewitt 2029 PA, .279/.333/.444, 115 doubles, 10 triples, 57 HR, 146 BB, 11 SB, 12 CS
Laroche 1981 PA, .295/.365/.525, 106 doubles, 3 triples, 94 HR, 36 SB, 19 CS
He hasn't hit when up here, he is no better defensively, and is injured more than he is healthy. Now some are pointing out that his AAA numbers are better than DeWitt's major league numbers.
More importantly, as you say, DeWitt has won the third base job at the major league level. He is playing solid third base, hitting clutch, and for average, and occasional power.
What has he done to lose his position and have it taken away?
I'll bet my Kevin Maas rookie card that he won't.
But until then, he should be our third baseman, right?
And at what point does everyone believe he is for real? after 3 months? a year? 2? 5?
Is everyone here going to say "I told you so" when he has a couple of 0 fers? He has done that and come back better each time.
LaRoche stunk up the joint last September and he is entitled. Now someone is going to point out the OBP for him. But in the old days, that was called don't let the 8 hole batter beat you with the pitcher on deck.
And when his average dips to .280, send him down. Which should be after the NL has scouted him and pitched around.
In about a week.
as if we have a roster and farm system of guys hitting over .300
so by that standard, we need replacements ready for everyone except Martin and Furcal...
thanks, that was a good way to start off my day with a laugh...
no one hates him at all, he has potential...but hundreds of guys have had potential over the years...thousands even...
we have someone doing it now...everyone wants to toss away what we have now for potential...
That's not funny, that's the Dodger way.
the Dodger way will be to trade him away to make room for LaRoche, and DeWitt to outperform him for someone else...
but as we used to say, that is why they play the game...
And then I'm going to rub it in your face until the end of time. As I expect you to do to me.
LaRoche should be working out at 2B, Jones should be benched, Kershaw and McDonald should be given a shot up here...
there are a lot of problems with this team, moving out one of the 2 or 3 steady players is not what what should be doing...
New post up top.
Ask Greg Brock if he wants to see DeWitt fail, or if he just expects him to? Big difference.
And like I said in 406, new post on top.
IndianaJon stated that LaRoche was better than A-Rod and Mike Schmidt and no poster said a word in retort! I think that demonstrates just how much LaRoche has been hyped.
It is just interesting to me, as it must also be to Howard Fox, the extent to which posters here elevate prospect ratings and minor league records. The only thing that counts, guys, in MLB performance. Lindsey and Tiffee are hitting like phenoms at Las Vegas. Yet I don't see anyone touting their stats -- for good reason.
I am a DeWitt partisan but I do not believe any of the posters wishes to see him fail. They just want to see their guy, LaRoche, at third. But the bottom line is that DeWitt has played and is delivering big; LaRoche couldn't deliver last year or during the last two spring training periods. That makes DeWitt the incumbent. LaRoche DOES have something to prove -- that he can remain injury free, hit dingers at Las Vegas, and smack the ball at least as well as the likes of Lindsey and Tiffee.
We all have our opinions, but it would be interesting to hear a learned assessment of each's potential ability to play second base.
One thing I am sure we can all agree on: It would be far better to have DeWitt and LaRoche BOTH in the lineup as opposed to Nomar and Kent.
I'm not much of a sabermetrics fellow and usually defer my opinion over to the more knowledgeable experts who patron this wonderful site, but in the case of LaRoche, I've been trying to see the same thing as most of you are seeing in him and have yet to be infatuated with his potential. Granted there has not been many opportunities to view his performance for an extended period of time but it is disturbing to me how everyone is automatically anointing LaRoche as the heir-apparent at 3B when, to me at least, the respective performances of Blake and Andy haven't warranted such bestowment of title. This is especially disconcerting when the consensus critique of Dodgers management is playing the likes of Andruw Jones, Nomar Garciaparra, Juan Pierre, and Jeff Kent over the more well-deserving younger options the organization has.
I don't necessarily think that DeWitt has won the third base job yet because I'm still under the impression that he will eventually need to be sent down to the minors for further seasoning once major league pitchers figure him out and exploit his weakness(es)--the kid really does need to employ going the other way more often--but I would think that he should be more widely considered to be further along as a 3B prospect than LaRoche at this point, which for whatever reason is not reflected in the comments around these parts when discussing the performances of the two.
This sense of entitlement to third base was even cited as Andy LaRoche's downfall two Spring Training sessions ago when management felt that he didn't work hard enough to win the job. DeWitt has shown himself to be more than capable of handling the defensive rigors of the hot corner and...oh yeah, he just so happens to be leading all rookies in batting average and is tied for second on the team in homers.
During the last two televised broadcasts of the Freeway series, I've heard the announcing crew reference Hanley Ramirez and Don Mattingly when mentioning Blake DeWitt as examples of players who exceeded their minor league performance at the major league level. Now if the play-by-play teams for the Fox national broadcast and even the Angels can give DeWitt the benefit of the doubt, why can't the more devoted Dodger fans follow suit?
Eric Karros often recites the phrase that "a major leaguer is a minor leaguer with an opportunity" when he references Blake DeWitt and I feel that is an apt description of his success thus far. So I find it quite strange how most value LaRoche's potential over DeWitt's performance when Blake has made the most out of his opportunity (singular) while Andy has not with his opportunities (plural).
DeWitt has earned the job. LaRoche is still a prime prospect, overdue for more time on the Dodgers. These are two thoughts one can retain in the same head.
Those who predict DeWitt will fade might be proven right in the fullness of time. But let's wait for that to happen before we yank DeWitt out of the lineup.
The fear I have expressed is this: Colletti might conclude, based on small sample size and a lot of press hype, that it is safe to trade LaRoche now to fill some short-term need...safe to decide the competition is over. That's not outside the realm of Colletti possibility, unfortunately.
But in the end, we should be perfectly open to the idea that either one of them will end up with the third base job long-term. We should also be perfectly open to the idea that they could both be in the lineup, but in different positions. That's how the "great infield of the 1970s" was built: Two third basemen, an outfielder and a second baseman.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.