Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Andruw Jones is having knee surgery after all, and the Dodgers have recalled Terry Tiffee to take his roster spot. And that's the way the ball bounces ...
* * *
Keith Thursby of the Times shows us the sports section from 50 years ago, when the threat of the Dodgers moving away from Los Angeles was used to encourage city voters to approve the plan to develop a baseball stadium at Chavez Ravine.
By Frank Finch
Times Staff Representative
President Warren Giles of the National League, who warned the city of Los Angeles yesterday that he will recommend that the league take steps to move the Dodgers to another city unless the June 3 referendum is passed, said today that there would be no difficulty in finding another home for the team.
Giles did not mention any city specifically but it is common knowledge that such cities as Minneapolis, Toronto and Houston definitely are interested in becoming big league - just like Los Angeles did when the City Council, by a 10-4 vote last October, approved the Chavez Ravine contract with the Dodgers. ...
* * *
By Paul Zimmerman
Times Sports Editor
So you think President Warren Giles of the National League is bluffing when he says he will consider reallocation of the Dodgers if the Chavez Ravine vote fails?
Well, have a look at the Minneapolis-St. Paul picture for a minute. ... This is an area comparable to Milwaukee where the Braves have been such a huge success. There are no competing events like horse racing. The metropolitan population is sufficient. The pull from outlying communities is similar to that in Wisconsin. ...
* * *
http://tinyurl.com/6pvtys
>>Perhaps that changeup quota was responsible for what from afar might have seemed like some mild control problems last year. Kershaw walked 50 batters with Great Lakes and another 17 in Jacksonville, an average of 4.9 per nine innings. But scouts believe that Kershaw will have above-average command, and his walks15 in 43 1/3 innings, or 3.1 per nineare already down from last year, even though Kershaw was the second-youngest pitcher in Double-A.
Kershaw has bought into the Dodgers developmental plan for him, knowing that even if throwing his changeup more frequently results in a few more walks to minor leaguers, that doing so will have positive long-term ramifications when he faces major league hitters.
"You can't be a two-pitch pitcher and be a starter," Kershaw said. "So we started working on that immediately as soon as I got drafted. I started to throw the changeup, and it started to get better. It wasn't very good in the Gulf Coast (League), and then last year it got a little bit better. This year they really kind of almost forced me to throw it in games, telling me to start some hitters off with it, get behind in the count, start throwing it a little bit. When they force you to do that stuff, it will definitely make you work on it. It's there, just sometimes my confidence isn't there with it, but it's definitely a good pitch to have when I've got good confidence in it."<<
Awesome.
I wonder how long they have saved that article so they can release it when he got the call up.
Really nice article.
http://ballhype.com/video/kershaw_s_curve_3_9_08/
14 - Though I never had the rights to that clip, it bugs me that another site is getting all the hits for it.
I imagine the Burma cyclone is big news there, too, yes?
its around 30-35 I think.
Its news...Although I haven't been paying much attention to it.
You're too big to get away with fun stuff, but not big enough to quit your job, hire a staff to run the blog, and move to a permanent vacation in the south of France.
I (we) hope it also helps his psyche...
I can't stop laughing.
The organization's misutilization of LaRoche is baffling.
of course he's hitting the corners with 96MPH heat.
If Laroche isn't going to get the majority of ABs while up here, isn't it better to have him play all the time in AAA?
Nomar was placed on the DL on April 26, so the earliest he could come off is June 25.
we gotta hope the Ump stays consistent.
Yeah, but LaRoche is better than Tiffee so I'd rather have his bat than Tiffee.
Pedro Martinez:Delino DeShields::Clayton Kershaw:????
I'm kidding, right?
I guess some guys are only able to be throwers
So does this bad stretch for Penny completely invalidate anything he's done over the last few years? I don't get it.
You have four rotating lineups (the relative ratios of the lineups can be tweaked a bit) where 1B, 2B, and 3B are shared between Loney, Kent, DeWitt, and LaRoche like this:
Loney 1B, Kent 2B, DeWitt 3B, LaRoche BN (3/12 days)
Loney 1B, Kent 2B, LaRoche 3B, DeWitt BN (3/12 days)
Loney 1B, DeWitt 2B, LaRoche 3B, Kent BN (4/12 days)
Kent 1B, DeWitt 2B, LaRoche 3B, Loney BN (2/12 days)
That gives Loney 10, DeWitt 9, LaRoche 9 and Kent 8 starts every 12 games. Maybe that's more rest than we'd like to see Loney get, but it's not excessive. Kent could use the rest given his age. Andy and Blake both get to start 75% of the time, which seems (to me) like enough. (Add in PH/DH appearances, as whoever's on the bench will be the top hitter on the bench, and there's even more PT.)
The only question about this would be whether DeWitt can handle 2B, but seeing as Kent's not the most mobile guy anymore and he's our regular starter, the defense probably doesn't get worse.
Oh, and the lefty/righty platoons work out nicely (3B: LaRoche R, DeWitt L; 2B Kent R, DeWitt L; 1B Loney L, Kent R) so we could even stack the lineup in our favor depending on the opposing starter.
Does anybody see anything NOT to like about an idea like this?
I hope Kent never starts over James Loney for the rest of his life.
I'd also like to pry Norichika Aoki loose from the Tokyo Yakult Swallows and then adjust the order after sticking Pierre on the bench [or on the bus out of town].
If lose they must, at least stop losing this way. It makes a fan feel like he's wasting his life.
I hope as underdog suggested, although this reflects wholy on me, and not him, that the Dodgers get some good draft picks when it comes to contract time for Lowe and Penny.
And I think the rap on Penny was that he was going to throw a lot more home runs, not that he would lose his command.
1) Penny and Lowe both in a funk.
2) Kent not really hitting but still batting fourth.
3) Andruw Jones up to his late injury was batting high in the order for the most part and being treated like a productive player when he really wasn't.
4) Fifth starter a constant question.
5) Almost no power.
I would have never dreamed this (coming in to the season) but watching Andruw Jones batting in that critical situation was SUCH A BUZZKILL for me at least.
6) Joe Torre can't make a lineup to save his life.
I don't believe it will happen this year if ever. And it seems to be something that is talked about as if going happen sometime next month.
Could it happen, hey anything could happen but its not like even when Loney played a few games in the outfield in Vegas, LaRoche is playing 3B in Vegas and DeWitt is playing 3B in LA. And there appears to be no hurry to change that.
I don't believe it will happen this year if ever. But it gets ttalked about as if going happen sometime next month.
Could it happen, hey anything could happen but right now its not like when Loney played a few games in the outfield in Vegas just to see if you could do it in LA, Andy LaRoche is playing 3B in Vegas and Blake DeWitt is playing 3B in LA. And there appears to be no hurry to change that in the foreseeable future.
Nice point about Punto.
But even if you could go back in time and erase that inning, all that would get you is a 0-0 game.
high gas prices!
I find myself clutching onto a Minotaur doll, making through my days relying on my unwavering belief that Clayton will come through, chanting "Kershaw is coming, Kershaw is coming"
True that. But that what happens with a singles hitting team. If you cant put together 4-5 hits in an innings, you just dont score. This team has very little power and even a double is asking to much. Ethier, Loney, Kemp, and especially Kent really need to pick it up in the power department or we will see a lot of this happening
They had a repeat of opening day with players from the past running out to the positions before the game, hopefully they will have another luncheon with teams from the 70's and 80's that will feature the teams from my youth.
Torre must be going out of his mind. Lack of power isn't something he's used to.
Ludwick and Pujols almost have as many home runs as our entire team. Thats sad. Our best power hitter is our 5'9 leadoff shortstop that is on the DL. Thats really sad. I dont think we have anyone on pace for even 15 bombs. Thats really really sad.
Tell me, in the last three years, how many big free agent signings have there been?
Soriano, Carlos Lee, Barry Zito, Aaron Rowand.
Maybe they should have kept the wallet closed but surely that would have meant trading some of the players on the Dodgers right now.
blessing. But I know how you feel.
Good ones in recent years: Vladimir Guerrero, Alfredo Soriano, Ivan Rodriguez. With Kent and Lowe, the Dodgers used up their FA luck.
Mostly, free agents just give you overpaid mediocrity. And lots of alibis.
The interesting teams right now have mostly grown their own: Philadelphia, Tampa Bay, Arizona, Detroit and Colorado last year.
So, as far I'm concerned, the $100 million could have gone in the bank.
I wouldn't say FA is a "suckers game", because a lot of notable free agents in past years have gotten teams 'over the hump' and championships. Instead, I'd call it a "wise mans game", and Colletti isn't proving very wise
Anyway, I have to be careful here, or somebody's going to look up what my man Byrnes is doing, and throw it in my face.
I know that's crazy hyperbole, but seriously, TERRY TIFFEE? TERRY TIFFEE!!!
Did Andy LaRoche pour sugar in Colletti's mom's gas tank or something? I mean seriously, Terry Tiffee?
Of the Red Sox front line players, only Manny, signed eight years ago, and J.D. Drew were traditional free agents.
The Phillies' idea of a big free agent this winter was Pedro Feliz for $3 million.
Nothing wrong with importing players, making trades, etc. It's the headline-making FA signings that PR man Colletti likes. Those are the ones I call a sucker's bet.
Not to say sucker's bets don't work out once in awhile. Lowe and Kent are two who basically delivered what the Dodgers expected. But you lose more than you win and you lose big.
(If not mentioned before)
Nothing is coming to mind.
I can't believe I root for this team. I really can't.
I also bought tickets at the game tonight for the Minotaur's debut tomorrow. I will sport my Dodger Thoughts shirt. My wife and I will be in the Loge section 114 Row W, seats 1 and 2. It would help if the Dodgers would actually score a few runs against the Cards for a change. It won't matter how well Kershaw pitches if we "don't hit like they did tonight". Were they hitting with real wooden bats tonight or plastic toy bats? Very few balls hit hard.
Kent
Hu
Maza
http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=11326
The Cubs were pioneers in screwing over Hee Seop Choi:
http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=30628
Times like these make me rue rule 1. Something something something.
I am afraid to go look at True Blue right now.
205 Silly coach, losing because John Terry can't stand up properly on a PK. He's lucky he didn't get picked off in Moscow.
To be fair, I think there was some management changes during that period.
I get why people feel that way, Andy LaRoche has had the best minor league statistics than any of the other young players on the Dodgers (Martin, Loney, Kemp, Ethier and DeWitt) and has been a top prospect almost from the time he was signed in 2003.
And yet, he has now played almost as many games in Vegas by himself than the other 5 listed combined. (Okay, not quite true but Martin and Ethier only played a month, Kemp played less than year total, and Loney just a little over a year. And DeWitt has never played at AAA).
So while I disagree on your conclusion, I get why you come to it.
Maza and Tiffee? Didn't they open for Thin Lizzy back in '76?
It's a reasonable explanation for Schmidt, but not for Jones. If they weren't happy with Pierre in CF -- and who would be? -- they could have just as easily moved Kemp there, instead of all the babble about trading him. Even if you didn't predict Jones would tank so badly, was it so clear he would contribute more in CF than Kemp, so much more it warranted paying $19 million for it? No, Kemp was passed over strictly because of his lack of experience, lack of reputation and lack of fondness for trashcans.
Resigning Nomar -- same thing. LaRoche was arguably ready to play in the bigs last season. Maybe Nomar would've been better. Except he's so injury-prone, we ended up having to play Shea Hillebrand. We could've always gone that sad route, if LaRoche didn't work out or got hurt. We didn't need a detour into a rich contract for Nomar.
Now the Dodgers are like a piece of furniture you have to build yourself that is packed with a bunch of extra pieces. You have enough for a file cabinet, but then you look at the extra pieces and think you should use them. Then you break the file cabinet.
Would every one who thinks bringing up Tiffee is a good move please raise his or her hand? I get the feeling this is another move that nobody agrees with, but that some people don't like to see Colletti get kicked in the shins, again.
That's why you can only option a player to the minor in three years. After that the player has to go out on waivers and can be picked up by anybody. Repko is well aware of that.
Kent is the part time player, not DeWitt. And it's not a matter of demoting him, or taking time away--he's a part time player right now. Wouldn't it be nice to use the time that's just being killed, giving it to Maza, to learn whether DeWitt can take over next year?
You guys may be right that it's not worth getting all worked up over. But even so, it was the wrong move. Absolutely, positively, beyond any shadow of a doubt, the wrong move. Indefensible. And it frustrates me to see the Dodgers being run as if it the team were a a donkey pinned to the wall and Colletti was a blindfolded four-year-old.
Ned Colletti needs to do more than schmooze
http://tinyurl.com/5t4hwy
Is this a signal that Ned will be moving LaRoche? I am starting to get that impression, given that neither LaRoche nor DeWitt are being worked at second base.
Losing Garciaparra for an extended period didn't bring third baseman Andy LaRoche back from Class AAA Las Vegas because the Dodgers are expected to ask the rookie to increase his versatility and play every day while making the adjustment.
Our problem is still with our pitching, we are getting no consistency, and our starters (aside from Chad usually) are good for at least one blow out inning every time out.
By the way, at last night's game, and when Penny went sprawling on Lohse's grounder up the middle, he did something to himself, either the ball hitting a finger on his pitching hand or pulling something when he went down, but if anything he did shake himself up. He then proceeded to toss 10 straight balls, then the hits...
He isnt helping the Dodgers there either.
This move is just asinine on so many levels. LaRoche could be taking the Sweeney pinch hit ABs, he could be getting starts in LF, at 3rd base, even at 1st. It's mind blowing that the Dodgers, who knew full of Kent's age, didnt move LaRoche to 2nd either. At some point, they are going to have to realize that hitting/pitching win games, and defense is a far 3rd. Yeah, its great to have a defense out there, but not at the expense of guys that cant hit.
Dodgers just need to put the best 25 guys on the roster, and play the best 9 guys everyday. Simple right?
As simple as waiting until spring (to see if anyone was looking for it) to divvy up the $4.4 million and then leaving town.
Rather than experiment with DeWitt at 2nd in the big leagues, why not try LaRoche at 2nd in AAA, where the learning curve is not as detrimental to the Dodgers winning? What is to be gained by keeping him at 3rd in Vegas?
Then of course he has to play cleanup because that's "his spot" (sounds 4-year-old again). It seems he's being allowed to make his own decisions, not the manager. I just wonder - if his slump continues right through to the All Star game - if he might decide to retire, or be given the opportunity to do so rather than be taken out. It's sort of his style. But I guess it's this team's style to find a convenient injury for him to be put on the DL instead. After LaRoche has had a couple weeks to try out second base at Vegas and/or Furcal is back and Hu's available.
Tiffee, meanwhile, had the type of versatility the team wanted since he could play both third base and first base, positions Nomar Garciaparra would have played before he got hurt. So much for Ethier as backup at first.
"I'm very much assured (Andruw Jones's) presence has made (Andre) Ethier and (Matt) Kemp better players and even made Juan Pierre more selective at the plate." - Ned Colletti. Gee, I thought Torre did that. How did Jones make them better--did they get together and say "Gee, let's never look like that?"
I have a bit of a man-crush on Blake DeWitt and I understand the argument that he has earned the job at 3rd base, but I just think his conversion to 2nd base makes more sense for the overall good of the team.
I feel almost exactly like 228 right now, but I am OK with the Dodgers getting creative and having LaRoche stay in AAA to play some 2B. I can understand that line of reasoning.
That made me laugh...
2005 -- .283(BA) .333(OBP) .428(SLG) 761 (OPS)
2006 -- .268 .339 .442 781
He also hit 7 more homers in roughly 60 less ABs. And this was all with the backdrop of moving from Columbus to Vero Beach.
If I buy it do I have access today?
Is the $19.95 per month pro-rated?
Can I cancel in the middle of a month?
Is the quality as good as the test that I viewed for free? Which I thought was very good.
I'm on the east coast so I assume the only blackouts that I may be subject to would be when the Dodgers play the Mets.
Thanks for any help on this.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/05/24/how-clintons-comments-didnt-then-did-catch-fire/
"The fact that it did become big news is illustrative of journalistic competition in the Internet age. The entire pack of reporters sent to watch Clinton's every move had somehow gotten beat, and forced into following a New York Post reporter who was nowhere near the campaign, but who, apparently, had a much-better Internet connection."
sorry, and now we return to our regularly scheduled program...
I think you will pay the full $19.95 for the month, but it will be a month starting today, and you won't have to pay again until this day next month.
You can, and you will be refunded some portion of what you paid.
Meh. My computer, which is new, and my internet access which is as good as they would give me, cannot seem to handle the 800k. So I really only watch online in an emergency, usually watching on EI.
I'm in Columbus OH, so I am blacked out for games when the Dodgers play Cin or Cle (fine because I can just watch the Ohio team broadcasts), but I am also blacked out when they play Pittsburgh, whose games I do not get. You will also be blacked out for FOX Saturday games that are not being shown in your area, or Sunday ESPN games.
That was just perfect, Eric.
You do realize that he's 29-years-old and has been playing at AAA since 2004, right?
You can subscribe on a month-by-month basis.
And may God have mercy on your soul.
I think that's a good thing.
Torre gave Cromer 134 PA in 1995 before he got fired. Then Mike Jorgensen stepped in and continued the trend.
But I'm a known MLB.tv crank/loather/enemy.
Other people seem to like it fine.
Those people have sold their souls to Satan however.
Chris Young homers to lead off the game in Atlants for the D'Backs.
1. What is this "versatility" that LaRoche needs to work on? Versatile as in learning a new position? Or versatile in some other way, like his hitting stroke? It's not at all clear in the story. If we all knew LaRoche was spending the next two months learning how to play second base, the tension level around here would drop precipitously, and the Tiffee move would make a lot more sense.
2. Sometimes, writers ought to be able to ask the obvious, albeit gauche, question.
Leung writes:
"I find Esteban Loaiza pretty much accepts what news you give him about the same," Torre said. "There was no anger."
Could it possibly be because he's ecstatically happy? After all, he's just found out he's going to get paid nearly $7 million for doing nothing. Believe me, if someone came into my office and said, "We have to let you go. I'm real sorry about that. Oh, and don't forget, we owe you $7 million," I would also have "no anger."
Loiaza was happy not because he would be getting paid to do nothing. He was happy that the team was giving him a chance to go somewhere else to play regularly.
I'm surprised you're that cynical.
But my point is that for a minor league system to function properly, there must be incentives for players to work hard, develop new skills, and perform at the highest levels. The primary incentive is advancement to the next level of play. The system ought to be a meritocracy in which a player advances or is demoted, not based on his draft position, his prospect ranking by Baseball America, his friendship with team officials, or his past stats, but on the strength of his current performance alone.
How would one explain to a utility player hitting .422 that the team was promoting to the big leagues instead of him someone whose performance had been substantially poorer? What kind of impact would such a decision have on the morale of other players?
The minor leagues only exist for the players that have the potential to be useful major leaguers, everyone else is near irrelevant.
I agree with you in part, but more often than not the player who is branded as a "prospect" will get the call over the guy tearing up AAA.
That's why guys like Rick Short have only had cups of coffee in the majors and play in Japan a lot.
The system ought to be a meritocracy in which a player advances or is demoted
Which is why the 24 year old with a .306/.408/.555 AAA line in 152 games should be promoted over the 29 year old with a .297/.339/.453 AAA line in 389 games.
All I'm saying is, why doesn't a reporter at least ask the question:
--Joe, you think maybe he's okay with the news because he's making $7 million and doesn't have to do anything to earn it?
That said, I have no problem with LaRoche staying in AAA to play 2B or LF for the time being.
Wouldn't Torre find that question to be rather offensive? I would.
To assume that Loaiza wants to get paid for doing nothing has never been indicated. He didn't want to go to on the DL. He wanted to keep his job in the starting rotation.
It's not like the Dodgers are going to the World Series this year. I would regard it as quite a nice surprise if they make the postseason.
I'd be much more disappointed if they trade LaRoche for some "missing piece of the puzzle" than if they miss the playoffs. Just keep the young guys improving, we'll get there.
Reporters today are too cozy with their sources.
So you would ask a question of a third party asking if a particular person was completely without any integrity?
Where in the world is there any evidence that Loaiza justs wants to get a salary and not play anymore?
There is absolutely none.
Why doesn't the reporter ask Torre if he knew when Loaiza stopped beating his wife too?
Mine:
5 IP
5 k
2 bb
3 ER
No scientific thought went into this prediction.
7 K
4 BB
0 ER
9 IP, 27 K, 81 pitches
8 K
3 BB
2 ER
So, who else is headed to the game?
Pierre, LF
Maza, 2B
Ethier, RF
Martin, C
Loney, 1B
Kemp, CF
DeWitt, 3B
Hu, SS
Kershaw, P
With the usual caveat that I count Ethier as a homegrown player because he was acquired as a minor leaguer and has only played in MLB with the Dodgers.
Do you really believe that all player personnel decisions should be made on the basis of potential and not on current performance?
Remember, Piazza was a late round draftee who was treated poorly during his first couple of years in the system. He had to scrape and claw his way ahead of players whose "potential" was considered higher.
If potential were the only valid arbiter, Ivan Guzman would be starting in L.A.'s infield right now.
Sometimes potential translates into performance; sometimes it doesn't. But MLB is full of players who might never have made it if they had been considered on potential alone.
Tiffee's promotion appears to be the product of a meritocracy. The team may very well take a quick look at him, then send him back to Las Vegas. But I will be rooting for him to succeed. He's earned his promotion.
Kershaw is the only guy in the lineup with more than 6 letters in his surname.
Piazza was 23 when he was called up, an age from which players actually improve. His career minor league line is .347/.409/.585.
Tiffee is 29, and has hit .293/.334/.431 in the minors, to go with his .226/.273/.351 in the majors.
I am rooting for Tiffee, but I am OK LaRoche is still in AAA only because he will be playing other positions (so he can get called up sooner). But to suggest Tiffee could do well because, hey Mike Piazza did well, is a but of a stretch.
He will have more, much like Kuo, depending on his strikeout total today.
I'm thinking KKKKKKKershaw.
I just hope he doesn't end with only 3 strikeouts. That would be a problematic headline in tomorrow's paper.
6 IP
6 K
1 BB
1 ER
7 K's
4 Walks
2 Hits
2 Earned Runs
He will strike out Pujols, relax, and give up a home run to Ludwick.
It's on Prime Ticket today, and since the default EI feed is the home team, you (and I) will get Vin today.
Of course, it's on the same channel as the sure to be 4 hour Yankees-Mariners game.
I get that some people like car racing, but listening to the Indy 500??? Car racing on radio?
The only thing worse that I can think of is golf on radio.
Tiffee earned the right to be a 25th player. LaRoche's future is as a starting 3rd baseman, I don't think it does anyone any good to have him on the roster as a 25th player.
If you have DirecTV you should have the option of feeds. Except of course for games like last night that were on a local channel for one team (Dodgers on KCAL).
That's shocking to me that the race would be blacked out. It almost makes me want to move to Indianapolis! :)
The Indy 500 in Indiana is a bigger deal than the Rose Bowl is in Southern California now. I don't think there is a Southern California equivalent to the Indy 500.
The Cardinals feed is on a local channel today, KSDK Channel 5, so you should be good.
"And yet somehow, in those eight games beginning May 16, the Dodgers are a respectable 4-4. That could bode well if this offense ever gets untracked"
7k
2BB
2H
0R
Rediculous traffic on DT....
It's harder in an area as big and with as many people as Southern California to get people interested in any one particular event.
:)
It's going to be a long day in South Florida.
Off to "The Game" ...
P.S. Kemp Hits a Home Run Today.
Loney, Billingsley, and DeWitt are the other 3. Scott Elbert and Chris Withrow are the other 2 1st Round picks.
By the way, Marco Andretti wil break the Andretti curse today, making me a very happy man. That and Kershaw on the same day would be one I don't soon forget.
Kershaw
Kemp
Kobe
Kershaw
Kemp
Kurt Thomas!
Has a nice ring to it.
http://tinyurl.com/5nxl34
Have a great time at the game, Bluebleeder, 68elcamino427, and everyone else whom will be there.
5 IP, 8 K, 4 BB, 3 H, 1 R
His reasoning is right out of the McCarthy Era.
Tailgunner Joe, not Marse Joe.
http://tinyurl.com/4esyx9
Hopefully the fence is barbed wire.
Lou Criger got 7 votes in the first election and that was more than several other players who were subsequently elected. 17 of them I believe.
Oh man, we don't need a 1B. But whatever gets him up quickest I'm OK with.
And Kershaw and Kuo channeling Koufax.
I believe LaRoche has already been checking with the equipment manager to see how Texeira is spelled.
It's under investigation.
But since it's racing, it's really just under conjecture.
I took a look at the ratings of Dodger prospects in the 2002 edition of Baseball America's Prospect Handbook.
If "potential" had been the only determinant, here's what our line-up might look like today:
Starting pitchers:
Ricardo Rodriguez
Ben Diggens
Hong-Chi Kuo
Joel Hanrahan
Brian Pilkington
Jose Rojas
Infielders:
Joel Guzman
Joe Thurston
Willy Aybar
Jorge Nunez
Jason Repko
Brennan King
Victor Diaz
Outfielders:
Chin-Feng Chen
Luke Allen
Reggie Abercrombie
Shane Victorino
Candido Martinez
Catcher:
Koyie Hill
Then I looked at the ratings contained in the 2003 edition. It identified Eric Stults among 2002 draftees as "closest to the majors"! Our system's top-rated pitching prospect that year was Jonathan Figueroa. Kuo was rated #11 among Dodger prospects, while Broxton was rated at #18. Delwyn Young was rated last, at #30!
Scary, huh?
That's not potential. That's production.
LaRoche has outperformed DeWitt at every level of the minor leagues. That is where his higher potential comes from.
You keep writing about current performance. Meaning what? The only stats that count are what a player has done the past month, day, fortnight? I don't get it.
Currently, 12 of the 14 EI channels are in use. The final two (Game 13 and Game 14) are open for both the early games and late games, meaning there are at least two channels to which the Dodger game can be switched if the Yankee game runs long.
Here's the status of some other possible channels that could be open in 25-30 minutes:
Game 6 - Toronto leading KC 3-1, bottom 8th, 0 outs.
Game 12 - Indians 1, Rangers 1, bottom 8th, 1 out
Also, David Dellucci's AB music is the Godfather theme.
Schumaker CF
Barton LF
Pujols 1B
Ludwick RF
Glaus 3B
LaRue C
Izturis SS
Wellemeyer P
Ryan 2B
That was from Matthew Leach's blog on the Cardinals' MLB.com site.
It also sucks that the home team is losing so we're forced to have a bottom of the ninth.
The Royals just lost, so now there are at least 3 other channels to which the Dodger game can be switched to:
Game 6
Game 13
Game 14
There will be Hell to pay if I don't see Kershaw's first pitch.
I know theres been stuff said that he cant field it well enough or doesnt like it or whatever, but having play 1st in LV seems pointless, at least have him in the outfield so he can replace tiffee right?
Yes, LaRoche outperformed DeWitt in the minors. But he hasn't outperformed him in the majors -- the only place it really counts.
What do I mean about "current performance"? I care less about a player's performance the past few years than I do about what he is doing this season. If this were not the case, I would be in favor of keeping Kent at second. After all, he's had a great career. But he's slumping badly right now. So I'd favor trying LaRoche, Tiffee, Maza, or Abreu (when/if he's healthy)in his place.
DeWitt is hitting major league pitching well enough at the moment to be considered for Rookie of the Year if he can sustain it. LaRoche is at AAA, where he isn't hitting for average and has only one dinger.
I join you in visualizing a lineup with a strong-hitting LaRoche in it, a guy who hits 25-30 dingers a year. He still has a chance to prove he can avoid injury and hit major league pitching. Give them the man an opportunity to adapt to second base at Las Vegas and bring him up when he's ready. If he is as good as his potential, he will easily beat out Kent.
No, 4 homers.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.