Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
So, have you ever sung the lyrics to "London Calling" by the Clash as if you were the Chris Farley character, Matt Foley?
The ice age is coming, the sun is zooming in
Engines stop running and the wheat is growing thin
A nuclear error, but I have no fear
London is drowning - and I live in a van down by the river
* * *
"After Delwyn Young's pinch-single in the ninth inning Tuesday night, Torre might feel compelled to give Young a start at his former position of second base if Kent is unable to play Wednesday."
And I love that SNL skit. Back when laughing during the skit was cool, before Jimmy Fallon ruined it!
Martin
Ethier
Kemp
Loney
Dewitt
Pierre
Maza
Hu
Lowe
Seriously: even if you are dense enough to think that Pierre has to bat leadoff, what kind of mania drives managers to believe that
Pierre, Maza, Ethier, Martin, Loney, Kemp
is better than
Pierre, Ethier, Martin, Loney, Kemp
The subjunctive and imperative mix together in a unholy marriage of verbs.
We need gpellamjr to tell us what mood that sentence was in.
Martin but no Kent i see. Last night the abyss of Pierre, Maza, Hu, Ardoin, Kuroda and Sweeney went a combined 1 for 17. All those players including Kemp and Loney had a negative "offensive" WPA. 6 of the Dodgers 12 plate appearances with an above average leverage index were from the "abyss" group. Maza's single was in that group. The non-abyss group was 4 for 15 with four walks, and was also 1 for 6 in above average leverage situations, but with three walks.
vr, Xei
Other songs in Chris Farley's fictional oeuvre:
Bruce Springsteen:
"Is a dream a lie if it don't come true?
Or is it something worse that sends me
Down to a van by the river
Though I know the river is dry"
Neil Young:
"Down by the river, I shot my baby
Down in a van by the river,
Dead, oh, shot her dead."
Richard Marx:
"I swear I left her in a van by the river
I swear I left her safe and sound"
"I jumped into [a van by] the river and what did I see?
black-eyed angels swimming with me
a moon full of stars and astral cars
all the figures I used to see
all my lovers were there with me
all my past and futures
and we all went to heaven in a little [van by the river]."
If there's no other opening, Kershaw could be sent back to the minors to help converse his arm and limit his innings.
http://tinyurl.com/6bzzpa
"I swear I left her in a van by the river
I swear I left her safe and sound
Hadn't thought of that song in a long long time.
"In the middle of the night
I go walking in my sleep
From the mountains of faith
To the van down by the river so deep"
87 - soon, LaRoche will be taking grounders at second, Kent will be on the DL and all will be happy.
Trust in the Ch-i
Actually, I still like it.
I liked it too. I'm gonna listen to it.
How about this?
L-Ethier
R-Martin
L-Loney
R-Kemp
L-DeWitt
And ... I live in a van down by the river, when I'm not in the basement:)
My Simulator: 35.03%
LV Hilton SB: 40.00%
AccuScore: 36.00%
vr, Xei
I think one reason Pee Wee did not get a start today may have to do with them still being a little worried about his defense at second with a ground ball pitcher like Lowe on the mound. Of course, that's assuming the ground ball pitcher Lowe is the one that shows up today and not the line drive and fly ball pitcher that has shown up too often the past month. Maza hasn't looked too bad at the plate, either. Still, be nice to see them squeeze DY in there somewhere soon.
Did I mention (today) that the team misses Furcal? Just thought I'd say that (again).
(That's it for me. Night all.)
Argh, I have a meeting at 4 today. Guess I'll be watching this one on delay later on.
I always liked the much sappier Marxist songs "Right Here Waiting" and "Hold on to the Night".
From Riverside Press-Enterprise game story from last Sunday.
Kershaw, who talked with Sandy Koufax before the game, said he was no more nervous than in any of his minor league starts and described it as "a pretty solid performance."
Wow, those numbers seem low. I guess that's what we get facing Big Z.
I'm going to give my Dodger win probability as well. I'm setting it at 100%.
In fact, if the Dodgers don't win tonight, I'll buy a Juan Pierre t-shirt.
If you buy the Juan Pierre t-shirt, you will also have to put on a catcher's mask and dance the can-can.
>>
Hi Tony,
Do you think the Dodgers are getting close to the point where they'd DFA Mark Sweeney and replace him with Andy LaRoche? I know they are (finally!) trying LaRoche at 2nd and 1st to give him more spaces to play with the big club (and DeWitt can play 2nd in a pinch, too). LaRoche is ready to contribute, especially with Kent struggling and hurting, and Mark Sweeney, as great a career as he's had as a pinch hitter just seems done. Do you think that sort of move is coming?
Thanks and happy travels.
May 28, 2008 10:30 AM
Tony Jackson said:
My guess is that move will come only when they feel they can get Andy a significant number of ABs up here. They do NOT want him coming here and sitting around. <<
http://wiens-world.blogspot.com/2008/05/dodger-game.html
This team has had problems all year hitting against right-handed pitchers, their hot streak came during a stretch where they played a lot of lefties.
Great pictures, and cool story. Were those ToyCannon's seats?
My question is: Are all other organizations utilizing these advanced statistics? I can't imagine that there are some that are ignoring things like FIP, BABIP, ISOP, etc., when they provide so much explanation behind the appearances of less-inclusive statistics (such as AVG, ERA, etc.)
Without giving any names, are there front office guys out there that are just completely ignorant to new-age stats?
For the record, I don't consider the Lakers three-peat to be a dynasty because it wasn't a long enough run. I'd say the Bulls in the 90s (though given the turn over in personnel between titles 3 and 4, it's questionable) and the Lakers in the 80s were the last true NBA dynasties.
There is no doubt that virtually every organization looks at a lot of analysis. Though I referenced FIP in this post, it served more as a confirmation of what our scouts were telling us.
Was that our Nate?
Depo's diplomatic. He knows full well there's plenty of GMs out there who have no idea what FIP or BABIP or IsoP are.
I don't think so. That nate's blogs didn't look like something our nate would be running.
I really don't understand the point of BABIP, other than stacking the deck for guys who strike out a lot, what's the point. I think I've made the argument more than a few times that a strike is the second (or third) least desirable outcome of a PA (behind double plays and triple plays, which are so rare as to not be statistically significant), so what is the advantage of removing them from the analysis? Why not remove GIDP? Or Line drive caught?
Probably not since they did not win a playoff series in 4 years.
I'd give dynastic status to both the Spurs and the Lakers. The Spurs were longer term, but the 4 titles in the Duncan era really solidifies them. Also, since drafting Duncan the Spurs have a .707 win % in the regular season (58 win average) over 11 seasons. For reference, Magic's Lakers averaged 60 wins in his first 12 seasons (.726 win %).
The Lakers get the dynasty status because of the 3 peat (only MN Lakers, 59-66 Celtics, 90s Bulls, and the 00-02 Lakers have done it), plus they made the finals in year 5 of that run.
Right. The idea is that hitters have control over striking out, but much less over what happens to the ball after they've put it in play. The latter is influenced much more by "luck" than the former.
I think of this Laker team as separate from the 3-peat years (how much do I owe Pat Riley for using that?), but I do enjoy the possibility of a 4th title in 9 years (same as the Spurs even though they've been solid all 9 years).
Sure, its more than likely that GMs (including the Dodgers) don't have Dewan's Fielding Bible on his desk or favorite links to BaseballProspectus.com and the like on his computer. Ned did say in a chat that there our people on his staff that do statistical analysis but did not go into detail of what they do and he also said it is all part of the process used to review players.
In fact DePodesta's answer seems to indicate that his mention of a certain stat only confirmed what the Padre's scouts were reporting not that they relied on one or the other more heavily.
I also would like to believe that if DePodesta is going to blog and take questions about the general state of the game, he would not just give a polite answer, he could say something like, I can't speak for other organizations, I only can speak for what I know the Padres use.
A couple of writers from Baseball Prospectus in the last few years have noted that there is not much in terms of analysis that is not commonly known in the business. Again, how it is used or if it used is a different question.
I refuse to believe that Ned knows what VORP or BABIP or FIP mean. Witness:
''Do I use VORP?" Colletti said, referring to one such sabermetric tool, Value Over Replacement Player. ''I may be using it and not even know it, and if I am, it's nobody's business. There are a lot of different criteria in judging players. I think I use, um, esoteric qualitative mathematical review times five. That's one of them."
Luck, to me, implies something that no one on the field has control over... a ball getting stuck in the tarp, a fan reaching out and taking the ball off the field of play, a pigeon being exploded by a Randy Johnson fastball.
But a guy getting to a ground ball, or making a diving stop, or making a great throw, is not luck, it is skill; just as a guy hitting the ball is a skill.
I think Ned was just being flippant with that response and you're taking him too literally.
Fixed, sorry, two thoughts at once is not so good for typing
In other organizations (i.e. Red Sox), there are multiple stats people and they are highly influential, and the GMs are sometimes statistical analysts themselves to some degree.
Also, having a stats analyst doesn't necessarily mean you have a sabermetrician. I've heard that at least a few teams have statistics-degree types who can put together a good resume, but who have little actual knowledge of the key concepts of baseball analysis.
The same goes for pitching vs. hitting, I've still yet to understand why strikeouts are good for pitchers but not bad for hitters. You can't say a guy striking out is simply bad luck and therefore shouldn't count, when there was obviously skill on the other side in throwing pitches that induced a hitter to swing at a ball or not swing at a strike.
http://tinyurl.com/4xd6na
It's not that the strikeout was bad (or good) luck, it's that a strikeout is completely in the realm of responsibility for both the batter and pitcher.
It's the balls in play stuff that are subject to outside factors (i.e. fielders). BABIP doesn't use strikeouts (or HR or BB or HBP) because all the responsibility for those events belonged to both the pitcher and batter.
The Ptolemies weren't bad either.
It's not a strategic decision to set the infield at double play depth or to put the shift on, or to hold the runner? And it's not skill for a hitter to adjust to those strategic decisions?
Sorry, I'm just skeptical by nature.
I sure hope it was worth losing Kyle Blair to get the stupid All-Star Game. Heck, by 2013 he could be pitching in the thing for some other team.
What is there was a TV show centered around NBA dyansties and/or HOF talk? :)
And even if you could constantly hit it to the worst defender, it would make a difference, but not a really big one. Last year, Kent missed 13 more plays than the average second baseman, so you'd get one more hit every 11 games if you could constantly hit the ball in Jeff Kent's direction. That assume some one is perfect at that sort of thing, which no one can be.
From Tony Jackson's blog (about 10 minutes ago)
Tony Abreu had season-ending surgery today, and the fact that ISN'T the lead item to this blog post should tell you where he stands in this organization. Anyway, they hope he can be back in time for winter ball back in the Dominican. ..
Actually, no, it's not. If you read interviews with hitters, you'll always hear that it's impossible to place the ball with that degree of precision. By swinging late, you can make a general attempt to hit the ball to the opposite field, but you have no way of controlling whether it becomes a grounder to the first baseman, a soft fly to right, or a single through the 2B hole. That part of it is luck.
Perhaps the key tenet of sabermetrics is that many things in baseball which are commonly believed to be the result of skill, are actually the result of chance.
Well, they have to go longer than 90 feet to get to the bag at 2B; they should get something for it! :)
Pin point accuracy is impossible, agreed, but it seems to me that too much is dismissed as a matter of "luck" to make any sort of statistical analysis meaningful.
Crenshaw scored three runs in the top of the seventh inning and tied its City Invitational championship with Lincoln, 4-4, at UCLA's Easton Stadium.
The title will be decided using the International tiebreaker, with a runner starting on second base.
Crenshaw's big inning came with a run in, one out and the bases loaded; a pop-up to first was the second out of the inning, but the ball was dropped; the runner at first base took off to second base and Lincoln played it like a force play. The runner from third and the runner who started from second both scored. The runner who began the play at first base tried to advance to third but was thrown out.
Again, that was all on one play. But two runners scored, and that was good enough fro Crenshaw.
Through eight innings, it's still tied at 4-4.
Softball does have the infield fly rule?
Speaking of which, many of you will recall that I throw a party for every All Star Game, with a menu based on the host city (Brats for Milwaukee, nouveau wine country cal cuisine for last year in SF, etc). New York this year will be great. I'm thinking, as opposed to the obvious dogs or pizza, that I'm going to go all Jewish with corned beef, blintzes, kugel, etc.
Next year for St Louis, I can come up with something (I'm sure Bob can help). But what'll I do for Anaheim in 2010? What is a typical Anaheim or Orange County food? Carl's Jr? Help me out, guys. Then hopefully in 5 years you can help me with the far more interesting question of what to serve for LA.
What player best represents early detection of greatness through the use of new age stats that otherwise was perhaps unimpressive by traditional stats?
Who are the top five players that have good new age stats that don't have good traditional stats?
Maybe Mexican food for SoCal?
I'd say Pat Burrell and Bobby Abreu are underrated given their traditional numbers.
I'm right there with you bro but what kind of players can we snag for a guy like Lowe?
Also, in general, the differences between traditional stats and sabermetric ones are not extreme enough to turn a "good player" into a "bad player." It's all about degrees. Everybody knows Jim Rice was a good player, he just wasn't as good as his traditional stats would indicate. Likewise, everybody knew Bobby Grich was a good player, he was just much better than his traditional stats would indicate.
For St. Louis you would have to serve toasted ravioli.
Except it's not really toasted, but actually deep-fried. But it sounds better to say toasted.
Actually any type of Italian food.
Maybe Healthcliff Slocumb.
If they did, hitters would bat 1.000 all the time. Why does the "skill" component only apply on a hit and run? Why can't the hitter in a normal at-bat say to himself, "Hey, there's a big gap out in right-center field, I think I'll hit it there for a double?"
The reason is that hitters cannot control the spot to which they hit the ball.
111 I actually had a Banh Mi for lunch today.
All Star Games I want to see, for purely culinary related reasons -
Philadelphia
Miami
Kansas City
San Diego
I would have included him -- especially since he is seemingly hated by the Brennaman family, and others -- but even Dunn's biggest detractors will acknowledge he hits a lot of homers.
Start working on your toasted ravioli
http://ericsfood.blogspot.com/2005/03/toasted-ravioli.html
vr, Xei
Jack Cust and Pat Burrell both finished in the top-25 in the ML last year despite hitting .256 (though I'd guess Cust's ops+ was higher).
He's one away from Ted Cox's record of 7.
Again, I fully agree that a hitter can't control where he hits the ball with pin point accuracy. That doesn't mean where they end up hitting the ball is pure chance. There are a multitude of variables in what is, ultimately (in my view at least) a multi level competition of skill, strategy, and talent. Luck plays a role, but I would posit that it is a smaller one than the other three.
7604 Linda Vista Rd
San Diego, CA 92111
858-278-8961
Never been there but got some good reviews on Chowhound.com
I'll have to try that this weekend. Thanks.
And thanks for the low down too, Jacob L in 127 .
Duck.
There are not too many good Mexican joints in OC, but there are tons of good taco trucks. There are lots of good Salvadoran Pupusa joints in OC too.
You could also do an Al Pastor spit and carve the pork right off the bone for great tacos.
I'd guess Ichiro.
Also, I think you are completely missing my point, but since I have a motion that I should have been working on for the last hour, I don't have time to get back into it.
But really, it's apparent to anyone who's watching the games that Torre and Bowa are full of you-know-what. The Dodgers' young players as a group walk far more than the older players do. If anyone lacks patience, it's Kent, Pierre, and their ilk.
Also, players who shorten their swing with two strikes tend to do things like hit weak ground balls. I don't know for sure, but I doubt that players who do shorten their swing hit any better with two strikes. All it does it prevent you from hitting a line drive, and line drives are the foundation upon which batting average is based. The Cubs announcers yesterday noted that Aramis Ramirez is leading the league in BA with two strikes, even though he never shortens his swing.
Torre's quote is just something you say when you have to offer an explanation for why something is happening and there's no good explanation. "I don't have a clue" wouldn't be an acceptable answer for a manager to give. Neither would "random chance." So they make up nonsense of this sort.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
2005: 4.10
2006: 3.72
2007: 3.97
2008: 3.72
He's the primary reason I will not have to purchase a Juan Pierre shirt!
I'm guessing he meant ribs and/or BBQ of Kansas City, not necessarily Kauffman Stadium.
And if San Diego ever gets an all-star game, mix it up with the fish tacos...get some shrimp, salmon, maybe even lobster if the budget allows.
Also, crab quesadillas are great.
Just read from Jackson that Abreu had season ending surgery, such a weird story he is
also, on a random note, I quite like this think blue t.v. with Eric Karros
No, the catcher must record the out. To take just the one example:
"Mickey Owen recollects the infamous 'dropped third strike' this way:
'9th inning, Yankees vs Dodgers, 2 out Dodgers leading 4 to 3. Henrich at bat. No-one on base. 2 strikes on the batter. Casey pitches a curve ball I signaled for. Henrich struck out. I missed the ball. Henrich reached first base on my error. Yankees then scored 4 runs. Dodgers lose to yanks 7 to 4.'
And the umpire must also call the third [and other] strike[s]. In this respect, re the Rays' April 26 game versus the Red Sox, well, there isn't a Rays fan who saw the pitch who doesn't believe that Navarro took strike three. Except it was called a ball. Navarro then singled and Iwamura then homered, and Clay Bucholz went from being up 1-0 to being a 1-2 loser, and that because the umpire called a taken strike three, a ball.
Mr. Garagiola and Mr. Berra would like to have a word with you, Daniel.
Ted Cox now opens up a bottle of champagne to celebrate. The same one he drinks every time a rookie doesn't get on base seven straight times to start his career.
I hear that his career was cut short by a drinking problem.
Will the choice of drinks be Mountain Dew or crab juice?
I don't understand how Bill Walton is in the top 10. I find him oddly refreshing.
Prime Ticket is showing me Tigers-Angels, probably a repeat of yesterday's game.
Unless he gets on base next time up.
{208]
Talk about the short end of the stick.
Darn. Zambro looks good tonight except for the beaning.
I like Walton, too. I hope maybe his inclusion was an ironic reference to his crazed hyperbole.
I can imagine him saying something like:
"Bill Walton is one of the top ten worst sportscasters in the history of western civilization!"
I always liked his Doug Christie fanatacism.
"Doug Christie...What skill! What grace!" Or something to that effect. Guy is hilarious.
OPS goes up, nice going Blake.
How can you not like that?
We know that some posters have expressed doubt in your hitting abilities (lack of walks and LD %). But you don't have to buy into that analysis my friend, just forget it and swing away.
Your pal,
BH
Morgan can be a joke but he's dead serious.
"The added muscle and bulk from pushing that steel and the natural maturation process now enables this grandmaster to regularly accomplish the unimaginable without dragging around excessive bulk and baggage. Most top players get to the point where they truly believe that anything is possible. Most are also governed by gravity, the laws of physics and self-regulating mental control mechanisms. Kobe has left all these behind. The extra strength and stamina have made him a superior 3-point shooter, a most dominant defender and arguably the game's top rebounder."
Awesome.
Coach Wooden and several of his former players including Walton were there.
I can't even remember if he spoke at the event but he was on the documentary and the respect and love he has for Wooden is readily apparent.
He also has stated that his most disappointing basketball experience (and Wooden's too) was not winning the 1974 NCAA championship and completing a 90-0 record.
I only meant it in the best light but I will retract it. Okay Eric Byrnes tweaks his hammy right when ST begins, plays with for almost two months and waits until both hamstrings are hurt before going on the DL.
That is an accurate representation of what happened isn't it.
Im going to enter "the league has solved Matt Kemp" and "Kent isn't HOF worthy" in for tonight, and ive only seen 2 innings.
I will refrain from ever using PVL with any Arizona Diamondback without expressed permission from Andrew Shimmin.
If Narbonne wins, I'm buying a Juan Pierre jersey!
Why, yes, my brain in fried, why do you ask?
I'm afraid, though, that I've now lost all respect for you. You gave in, just like that? To an especially (even for me) childish demand? Pretty sad.
He's not active.
And he wasn't very good in the majors.
Canuck and Nate:Jim Callis said in a Baseball America premium content article that scouts are not high on Aaron Hicks bat so he would view him as a pitcher instead of a potential two-way player.
That's what Ive been saying all along. If we were to go outfielder, I like Collier a lot. I am warming up to Melville again. Although my dream is that Hosmer drops and Dodgers finally act like a big market team.
With the looming ASG bid, doesn't look like it will happen though...Penny pinch! Penny Pinch!
And yet you don't get an RBI when a run scores when you ground into a double play. And you don't get an RBI if you reach on an error if the official scorer doesn't think that the run would have scored without the error.
I can keep coming up with exceptions until you start weeping blood from your eyes.
When they passed out superpowers, Bob was at the back of the line. But he still did better than Aquaman.
I like Collier's bat, I wonder if he can handle CF though.
The following is not park-adjusted:
Overall: .269/.340/.387, .321 wOBA, .156 $K, .109 $BB, .023 $HR, .307 $H, .0075 IBB/PA, .0109 SH/PA
League: .261/.330/.411, .325, .177/.114/.035/.297, .0075/.0109
NoneOn: .279/.339/.414, .332, .149/.097/.025/.316, 0/0
League: .257/.323/.410, .322, .179/.107/.036/.295, 0/0
1,x,x__: .248/.292/.337, .281, .160/.069/.019/.285, 0/.0446
League: .274/.336/.436, .338, .164/.102/.041/.305, 0/.0358
RISP__: .264/.372/.366, .324, .168/.158/.021/.303, .0279/.0157
League: .260/.354/.395, .322, .179/.136/.027/.297, .0273/.0163
1,y,y__: .293/.341/.423, .331, .194/.095/.028/.341, .0039/.0235
League: .259/.322/.394, .312, .183/.117/.026/.294, .0009/.0203
x,y,y__: .238/.397/.313, .319, .147/.207/.015/.270, .0472/.0094
League: .260/.383/.395, .331, .176/.155/.027/.299, .0512/.0126
So overall they strike out less than the league and have more hits per ball in play and fewer HR. The lack of power is enough to make them below average. With the bases empty, they're getting a lot of hits and are above average. With a runner on first only (1,x,x above), they have been horrible, striking out as much as the league but having a low BABIP, very low walks, and an extreme lack of power. They have also wasted an inordinate number of outs on sacrifice hits.
With runners in scoring position overall, they are basically average. While their edge in K's and BABIP is a tad less than it is overall, they have an above average walk rate that's counterbalanced by a lack of power. Broken down by whether first base is open or not (1,y,y = 2-3 runners on, one on first; x,y,y = 1-2 runners on, none on first), we see that they've been pretty good with first base not open. They're strike zone control hasn't been good, but they've had decent power and a great BABIP. With first base open, they've been quite willing to close it by taking a walk but have not been effective in getting hits, much less extra base hits.
Keep in mind that none of this is at all predictive analysis. I see no reason to think the Dodgers will be better or worse at situational hitting than any other team, and whatever they have done so far is not where the answer would lie if indeed they do have unusual skill.
That's true. That's why I really hope Hosmer drops and the Dodgers flex some financial muscle. His bat plays anywhere and he is athletic enough for a corner spot; especially with that rocket arm.
I can only make eyes bleed.
stop saying that.
What a difference from Fred McGriff, Jason Phillips, Eric Karros, etc.
And the last time I played fantasy baseball, I quit the league over a dispute over who picked up hot rookie pitcher Cal Eldred.
Hosmer! Hosmer! Hosmer!
It might otherwise be that, to a certain extent, likely not measurable, that the pitcher "bears down" with a runner on 1st. The disparity re 1st and bases-full is probably owing to the fact that one guy on first does not mean an ineffective pitcher, but the bases full might tend to indicate that fact, at least for this inning.
D4P does hate rich people.
Actually, I think he's just jealous they are rich for basically not doing anything while he slaves away at his academia.
Not too shabby. Tonight looks bad for us, but going foward looks real good to me.
Look at the picture sideways and judge:
http://tinyurl.com/aj4ej
Wow, that was a bad error.
I knew that Sutcliffe would bring up momentum if the Cubs got out of the inning.
Hopefully the Cubs this will have the same depressing end as Million Dollar Baby tonight.
Not really.
Milton Bradley?
At least this is an interesting game.
I'm not clear what you are talking about in the second paragraph. Pitchers do "bear down" situationally, which is why I gave the league averages. With first base empty and runners on 2nd and/or 3rd, pitchers are more likely to give up a walk and less likely to give up a hit.
>>Torre thinking ahead with Kent out
DeWitt could take turn at second as veteran battles tight back
Although Andy LaRoche is being tested all over the infield at Triple-A Las Vegas, DeWitt has a full Minor League season at second base and said he would have no problem returning to the position if the situation arose and LaRoche returned to play third base.<<
Perfect. Do it now, and for the rest of the season, everyday.
Boomer=Charley Steiner
Nonetheless, I believe Sammy will get us out of this with a win. I believe, I believe, I believe...
Pick off Matt Kemp!
Loney is a stud though..probably game over.
The Cubs have won the World Series.
Twice!
We'd survive a Cubs World Series win.
(shot rings out and body slumps over)
He also loves the 49ers.
...and then the Cubs will protest the game.
It was attempted murder!
... This entire team looks as if they're spending their idle hours studying the Walt Weiss guide to hitting.
Which, I guess, makes the Dodgers pretty average.
Saving him for all four games against the Mets, so he can go something like 10 IP, 29 K (one popup).
The Dodgers swept the Marlins, who have been in first place for much of the year.
I'll get the disposable cameras with flashes!
Berman's Pink Floyd reference was horriblie unfunny.
The Royals have two XBH tonights. And have scored EIGHT runs.
And are losing!
I would bet my life savings that somebody has left.
Rest: 6 for 19 with 3 walks.
This using Guo in only low leverage situations (mop up duty) is getting on my nerves a little bit.
vr, Xei
I hear he fakes those.
And I don't say that just because DeWitt is more than halfway to his 300th PA, without obviously collapsing. . .
It's the fans that deserve a break. Sigh.
Crossovers are going to be in, and Eric will lead the way!
I'll let our out of town guests figure out where Narbonne is.
Three games, 0 XBH, 3 runs scored, and 2 blown saves.
That is some impressive futility right there.
The dirty laundry has been ordered.
August 14-16, 1961, one game against the Cardinals and three against the Reds with a doubleheader at the end.
April 27-29, 1962, all against Pittsburgh at Dodger Stadium. And the Dodgers won two of those games.
The last three games of the 1965 regular season and the first game of the 1966 regular season.
The last Dodger team to go three games in a row without an extra base hit played in ...
....
.....
....
....
I'm warning you
....
.....
.....
....
You've been warned
.....
....
Still there?
....
....
1992
Alas, no Laker jersey. Here's what I ordered:
http://tinyurl.com/47hype
A complete waste of an MLB.com gift card.
Ahhhhhhh!!! The brightness burns!
They had a power play!
You mean by this Saturday?
It would probably take a Kent DL stay to make it happen, but I'll go along with that.
I won't commit to any t-shirts however.
I'm still not worried about this team. I'm convinced it's going to click and these guys are going to get hot.
Also, it doesn't hurt that the D'backs have managed to lose 3 of 4; and looking at losing 4 of 5.
... The wind was blowing in at Wrigley Field. I would expect the pitchers to have a good ERA under those circumstances.
There is no "bright side" to this team. They've become the Fortune 500 of baseball -- the payroll's a fortune and they're playing .500. It's not even enjoyable to watch the team; they haven't been fun to watch since the season ending series against the Giants in 2006.
Instead of results, we get excuses. The team doesn't want to call up LaRoche because they don't want him to rot away on the bench, yet they are A-OK with letting Young rot away. This organization treats their diehard fans as if they are complete morons, and it's insulting. No offense, but "bright side" my posterior.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.