Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Score one for the skeptics. From Allison Ann Otto of the Press-Enterprise:
A day after saying that he would accept a discount to re-sign with the Dodgers, Eric Gagne backed off that statement.
"All I'm looking for is fairness," the 2003 Cy Young winner said. "Hopefully I'll get that. I want to be a Dodger. I've been here. I know everyone. I've been treated with respect."
As for a discount, he said, "I don't think that's the right word."
Maybe the word he's looking for is, "Inconceivable!!!"
There are bigger hurdles for Gagne remaining a Dodger than his battles with semantics. After presumably buying out his 2007 option, the Dodgers do have an exclusive window to negotiate with Gagne on a short-term, incentive-laden contract. But those negotiations will be hindered by doubt concerning Gagne's ongoing recovery from injuries. And once that window expires - either in December if the Dodgers take the risk of offering Gagne salary arbitration, or in January if Gagne declines the offer, they cannot resign Gagne until May 1.
Meanwhile, every other team in baseball will be allowed to talk contract with Gagne in the months leading up to Spring Training - which is the time that a team could make the most informed decision about him.
The rules that discourage loyalty between player and team are an ongoing problem for baseball. In the sport's efforts to make sure the player's most recent team doesn't have an unfair advantage in negotiations, baseball has legislated a decided disadvantage.
* * *
Except for the aforementioned Vin Scully and friends, and perhaps Padres manager Bruce Bochy, no one was at their best last night - not Brad Penny, not Grady Little, not Julio Lugo, not the umpires, etc. Given how many breaks were going the Dodgers' way during their winning streak, it's hard to be surprised by this. But it was just one game of one series, and the Dodgers still left town not only in first place in the National League West, but third in the National League.
In the face of latent theories of Padre domination, Ken Gurnick writes at MLB.com that this was the first home San Diego sweep of Los Angeles since 1999, and the first time ever that the Padres have swept three series in a season from the Dodgers.
As I've said before, the difference between a great player and a lesser player is in how many times they are great. None are always great; none are always terrible. Even the best Dodgers are somewhere below the best in the majors. But they will bounce back, and it's just a matter of how often.
* * *
Some late-season defensive stats were posted at Baseball Think Factory by Chris Dial. Dave Studeman of The Hardball Times calls Dial's numbers "probably the best fielding rankings available during the season."
In the comments of the thread, Mitchel Lichtman, who pioneered the respected but rarely public Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), wrote, "Chris' numbers are so close to UZR that I would swear that he hacked into my computer!"
I still like the systems of John Dewan and David Pinto, but those don't come out until season's end.
How the Dodgers fare:
Above Average: Nomar Garciaparra
Average: Russell Martin, Andre Ethier, J.D. Drew
Below Average: Jeff Kent, Bill Mueller, Rafael Furcal, Kenny Lofton
In case you haven't heard, the Tangotiger 2006 Scouting Report by the Fans for the Fans is back and ready for your participation. It's a compliment to attempts to evaluate fielding statistically, inviting you to bring your observations to the head of the class.
In this streaky year one thing has remained constant. Blue can't beat the Pads. Is it time to circle the wagons? Hardly. It's a long season, although it's about crunch time. I feel better about the Dodgers than I did at the Break. They could tank again....that's what a long season can be full of. 2005 got off to a tremendous start and we all know how that worked out. The remaining schedule favors the Dodgers over the Padres. Boys just have to get the job done.
I'm a huge mark for Gagne and would love to see him back with the Bums, but I wouldn't break the bank to bring him back (I'd rather do that to get an ace or second baseman not named Jeff Kent). One or two years, lots of incentives (though I don't know what kinds of incentives you give a closer).
And to touch on some comments made in another thread.
*45. MJW101
Why are we so bad against the Padres? Is this a sign that we can only beat fair-poor teams, but choke when we play decent-good teams?
What does this portend for the playoffs (if we actually do make the playoffs that is)?
2006-08-24 09:02:1146. Jon Weisman
45 - It portends the Dodgers may have trouble in the playoffs if the Dodgers actually do make the playoffs*
Poppycock! The Dodgers went 1-10 against the mighty mets in 1988.
The Dodgers could have easily won 2 of 3 in this past series. If JD can catch a line drive it changes the whole complexion of game 1.
If Hendy pitches game 3 instead of game 2 we could have easily won game 3.
Instead of facing our ace, Lowe, the Padres lucked out again with Penny.
The Padres are no better than the Dbacks or Giants. What's this talk of the Padres being decent-good while the Giants Dbacks are fair/poor? Nonsense. Those 3 teams are evenly matched and their overall records support that. I'm just guessing here but I'm betting the fair/poor Dbacks have a better record against the decent/good Padres head to head. Likewise with the Giants-Pads head to head.
Dial says:
"Catchers are done as an amalgam of caught stealing per inning above average, stolen bases per inning above average, errors per inning above average and passed balls per inning above average, at an average base advancement of 0.31 runs per."
So basically Martin is rated average defensively because the Dodger pitchers stink at holding runners on. Given an average pitching staff, I have to believe Martin would rate as an above average defensive catcher.
Wow. Thanks for the link.
(I deleted comment No. 7, which was mine, because it addressed the commenter unnecessarily.)
San Diego - 65-62
Arizona, San Francisco - 62-65
There is more of a disparity between the Padres and the DBacks and Giants than there is between the Dodgers and Padres, going by W-L record now.
and, brandon belt is going to a JC instead of Texas so they will probably sign him too.
i want belt and anderson :(
oh, alex white attended class yesterday so we dont have his rights anymore.
good riddance Eric. You basically robbed the dodgers of 19 million these last two years and you have the nerve to want a "fair" deal?
Realistically, I think we need a strong showing in Arizona now -- 2 out of 3 at least, if for no other reason than to stop another potentially devastating losing streak.
Both parties are now welcome to agree or disagree on what's fair going forward, but Gagne doesn't have to feel guilty about the past two years (except for the fact that he might have tried too hard to make the contract look good).
Best case scenario: We go into Battery-Chucker Park needing to win*at least* two games to make the playoffs.
Worst case scenario: We go in there needing to win at least two games to keep the hated ones from making the playoffs, thereby helping "our other friends" either the Pads or the Snakes make the playoffs.
What a heckuva choice!
weren't the dodgers robbing Gagne in 03-04, kind of like they're doing to moy boy Saito today.
Baez had an emergency appendectomy last night and has been placed on the disabled list. *
So now we have a logical explanation to why Baez struggled in Dodger blue. His innerds were bothering him.
It seems that the proper protocol for a situation like Gagne's is to quietly do your rehab, then come back when ready.
It's not a good idea to go out and critize management when a big reason why the team stunk was because they had 10% of the payroll sitting on the bench.
I still love Gagne, but his comments this offseason, along with his continuing to pitch despite knowing he was hurt, really rubbed me the wrong way.
Except maybe Will Rogers. That guy just had an attitude problem. (Rule 7 violation)
Predictions don't normally have a best case and a worst case. In reality, the best case is that in the last weekend of the season we will have already clinched. The worse case is that we will have been eliminated. Instead of admitting your pessimism and then predicting the worst, why not just keep an open mind and enjoy the next month? At the very least, if you admit that you can't do so, why let others know?
That tears it. Your drunk entrance into the board yesterday was sufficient to make me leave DT for the evening before I said something in anger. And now this.
Please ban yourself for another week. And when that week is over, repeat. I don't know you - you might be a terrific, warm, fun person in "real life" - but the disrespect you show for everyone here, especially Jon, is, in a word, disgusting.
And I say this while actually agreeing with you that Penny has been pretty bad lately. This isn't about opinions. This is about decorum. I've had it. Now I will go elsewhere as well, lest I contribute further to the despoiling of Jon's wonderful site.
Personally, I continue to think that, in general, many of the posters here on DT focus too much on how to spend Frank McCourt's money and not enough on whether the best players available are on being added to the roster. But I certainly understand that in the context of Baseball 2006, it is a salient discussion point ...
35- Huh. Looks like the plurality of Bonds's at bats have been in the three hole (3433). Next comes fourth (1913) then fifth (1807) then first (1797). So, there you go.
I came close to banning Bluetahoe for good last night, because I suspected he wasn't really drunk, but was cruelly making fun of another commenter.
But, perhaps to my own deteriment, I'm trying not to ban people.
Further, wasn't there a long stretch where Bonds himself insisted on batting fifth ...when he could have better been hitting 3rd? I've posted this before: I've tended to bat him 2nd in Strat leagues.
The key word being "discernible." Players work very hard at rehab (not to mention PR functions and the like) even when they're on the DL.
One of my biggest pet peeves is when people make comments about so-and-so getting paid to sit on his butt, or for working three hours a day playing baseball. Most baseball fans seem to think that the only work a ballplayer does is that which they see on TV every night. There's a lot more that goes into it than that, offseason included. I guarantee you major league ballplayers put in longer and harder hours than any of us commenting on this site. They are paid commensurately, sure, but that doesn't change the fact that these guys work their butts off.
Leyland wasn't as much of a genius then as he is now.
Actually Leyland's levels of genius-hood tend to be all over the map.
26 Fair enough, maybe sympathy wasn't the right word.
You don't think the Dodgers have direct deposit?
I don't mean to start an all out debate on how tough it is or isn't to be a ballplayer, but just to follow up on what you said...
One of the things that people usually don't think about in the life of a ballplayer is the amazing amount of time that is consumed by your job. Want to go to your friends wedding? Can't. Wanna go to your child's recital? Can't. Wanna see your friend who's in the hospital? Nope. Wife's having a baby? Maybe a couple of days, maybe not. From March to October (or even Nov), 7 days a week your time is your employers. You have to think about whether you would do that, even for millions.
More reason to think that Furcal's contract now rates as one of the league's worst in the off-season. And before you get too excited about his .749 OPS, it ranks 14th in the MLB.
On the brighter side, the commute probably ain't too bad, since it's contra-traffic.
As an example, the Dodgers flew from San Diego to Phoenix after the game yesterday. So they got to bed at, I'd gues, 2-3 AM. And that was after a long frustrating evening.
Boras dose not = fair.
http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2006/08/for_college_sports_junkies.php
... this site should be of interest to some readers here:
http://www.lasportsbeat.com/
I'm really hoping that's another BT.
61
Long haul truck drivers rival baseball players in their use of greenies.
i have a friend that played for florida state & briefly played in the minors for the Dodgers (don't wanna give out his name) but i totally see what your saying.
The 'predicted' marquee matchup is now on Sunday night.
On Monday's you'll be seeing the Cardinals, Packers, Saints, and other predicted fodder on occassion. Kind of like how Sunday night football used to be.
I have had the exact same thought myself, but BT spells much better than F ever did...
If only you could follow the games from work...
You can only follow them on Gameday from work.
That's the lesser way of following games. People who do that are not real fans I've been told.
What do people think are the best albums of the 2000s?
I hereby present a top ten list:
1. The Dirty South Drive-By Truckers
2. Yankee Hotel Foxtrot Wilco
3. Transcendental Blues Steve Earle
4. I'm Wide Awake, It's Morning Bright Eyes
5. This Desert Life Counting Crows
6. Mermaid Avenue Volume II Billy Bragg and Wilco
7. Devils and Dust Bruce Springsteen
8. Van Lear Rose Loretta Lynn
9. Taking the Long Way Dixie Chicks
10. Kids in Philly Marah
Thanks!
In related news: Wrigley Field 1, COLE HAMELS 0.
That too, though this could just be a different incarnation
72 - some off the top of my head:
Killers - Hot Fuss
White Stripes - Elephant
Coldplay - Rush of Blood to the Head
Amazing how many "recent albums" I was thinking of are actually mid-to-late 90s. Ah, getting old...
Ditto. Very good album. Combines some serious "in your face" with very pretty music.
Strokes - Is This It?
Audioslave debut
Linkin Park - Hybrid Theory
Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots - the FL.
Sea Change - Beck
The Guest - Phantom Planet
Figure 8 - Elliot Smith
The Gray Album - (some DJ remixed Jay-Z's Black Album with The Beatles' White Album)
Relationship of Command - At the Drive-In
Green Album - Weezer
I was tempted to buy Yankee Hotel Foxtrot since I was big fan of Uncle Tupelo back high school, but I just don't care about music too much anymore.
I hate the Linkin Park song where the guy screams about being oppressed by everyone around him. By "song", I mean "every song they've ever done".
Vienna Teng: Warm Strangers
In fact, any of her three albums are great.
Beach Boys - "Sounds of Summer"
Beck - "Guero"
Jimmy Eat World - "Bleed American"
Zwan - "Mary Star of the Sea"
I feel you Bob.
how about great car commercial songs?
Metallica - Master of Puppets
Descendents - Somery
In no meaningful order:
Eye in the Sky - Alan Parsons Project
Sunglasses at Night - Cory Hart
True - Spandou Ballet
Take on Me -
Always Something There to Remind Me - Naked Eyes
Panama - Van Halen
Anything by Tears for Fears
Our House - Madness
There's a ton more.
i don't think Zwan is together anymore right? the guy writes great tunes none the less smashing pumpkins/Zwan.
Hybrid - Morning Sci-Fi
Beck - Sea Change
Cirrus - Counterfeit
Art Brut - Bang Bang Rock And Roll
The Blue Man Group - The Complex
BT - Movement In Still Life
Electric Six - Fire
The Wideband Network - Universe
VAST - Music For People
Jimmy Eat World - Bleed American
I also loved the movie soundtrack to "Rockstar" with Mark Wahlberg and Jennnifer Aniston.
Volkswagen's "Da Da Da." from the 90s. You know, the one where the guys drive around in a VW and do all kinds of random stuff while the music plays a simple beat with a monotone "Da Da Da." vocal line. That one was weird.
The Windows 95 ad with the Rolling Stones' "Start Me Up" was cool, to.
the name of the band is Ah-ha my sisters loved that song so i kind of don't like it, great song but it just reminds me of my sisters yelling & screaming when that song would come out.
he's always been on his own, he's another prince "& the revolution"
body of song - bob mould
folker - paul westerberg
american iv - johnny cash
surgery - the warlocks
clap your hands say yeah - clap your hands say yeah
howl - black rebel motorcycle club
Honestly...?
i don't know the name of the car company but there's this really cool song they have, i think it's Jaguar but i'm not sure.
When the Jimmy Eat World single "The Middle" was on the radio, I couldn't figure out the words but it was super catchy so I'd have to sing it in my car. I went with "It just takes some time/Little griddle ittle bittle out the right..."
Of course, the actual line is "Little girl you're in the middle of the ride."
Wow, I'd forgotten how cool that album was. I'm going to convince my cover band to add "Sweetness" to the repertoire.
over and over
foo fighters- the colour and the shape
arcade fire- funeral
the postal service- (dunno?)
smashing pumpkins- siamese dream
so, many.......from Casey's wife
safety dance - men without hats
destination unknown - missing persons
relax - frankie goes to hollywood
in a big country - big country
st elmo's fire (man in motion) - john parr (?)
(don't you) forget about me - simple minds
Aren't there any old guys here but me?
I know! Reissues! I can do reissues!
Dixie Chicks - Home
Radiohead - Kid A
Johnny Cash - The Legend of Johnny Cash
Take that, rate2!
:)
I will press on despite the added danger.
I go back and forth on Kid A. Sometimes I think it's almost as good as OK Computer and sometimes I just can't get fired up about it.
it gets a thumbs up from me, it's pretty simple song but that's how i like my music.
i have to confence i love anything Gwen Stefani.
Very few, if any, of the Amnesiac songs were worth releasing, in my opinion.
I feel the same way about much of HttT, but I really dig "Scatterbrain", "Wolf at the Door", and "Where I end and You Begin". "Drunken Punch-Up at a Wedding" was great because of the bass line and the fact that it's the most un-Radiohead song I've ever heard.
just to add to my comment SHE'S A MEGA BABE.
Some of these have been mentioned but I thought I would echo some cause they are just that good.
Radiohead- Kid A (A slight nood over Hail to the Thief)
Arcade Fire- The Funeral (There live show is better than the album
CYHSY-CYHSY
Bob Dylan- Bootleg Series Vol. 7 No Direction Home
Explosions in the Sky-The Earth Is Not a Cold Dead Place
My Morning Jacket- At Dawn
Tom Waits- Mule Variations (came out in '99)
CYHSY-CYHSY*
i've heard from other peaple that there really good.
I hate to say I'm turning into my Dad, but if the shoe fits...
Actually, I like Radiohead a little, the Dixie Chicks are OK but I prefer much grittier country. From Eric's list The first Mermaid Ave and Transcendental Blues I like alot.
Most of my musical taste runs to just really different genres.
http://lyrics.rare-lyrics.com/T/Trio/Da-Da-Da.html
Earlier this trip, I had the pleasure of seeing the Wisconsin Athletic Walk of Fame - Pants Rowland is up there, next to Alan Ameche.
No internet or newspapers or cable for me lately, so here's the from-a-distance view on the Dodgers: Wow - they're still in first place!
Doubt I'll be checking comments agin' for a while - hope you're all good.
Come back Sam!!!
It's not that I don't like the new stuff, it's that I've been an NPR news/talk listener for 15 years and don't listen to commercial radio.
And I hope that the vacation is going well, and all that stuff.
In fact, NPR is how I find a lot of music these days.
http://tinyurl.com/oyfdm
Come back Sam!!!*
he's gone for the moment Bob, it's o.k. he'll be back with us.
Under Bud Selig's administration with no umpire accountability, umpires are allowed to bait players and managers into arguing and then toss them for infractions that they caused, misinterpreting the rules, not understanding the rules and misapplying the rules they fail to understand is now status quo in MLB!! BTW I admit to an Anti-Selig bias after reading a book several years ago from a writer that had inside information on the events and factors that led to O'Malley selling the team to Fox. Listed as the second major factor is "Sneaky, Back-stabbing manipulative Bud" who basically usurped and kept O'Malley out of the power ownership committees, ignored Peter's warnings and pleas to work with the player's union prior to the 94 strike. Bud has worked it to punish the Dodgers since for the past successes we had in Los Angeles! SELIG IS AN LA-HATING, SNEAKY BACKSTABBER THAT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE BASEBALL UNIVERSE!!!!
http://tinyurl.com/kj8l7
What is Disney going to do?
Apple has identified my laptop battery as one that is NOT going to catch on fire.
Just wondering?
I've been all over the Pluto story! You've got to keep up.
The Griddle is your place for discussions of minor orbital bodies.
Thanks, not enough Diet Cokes and coffee yet today.
And the smell of smoldering flesh keeps bothering me.
154 I don't know what Disney is going to do. Maybe reclassify Mickey's dog as a Kuiper Belt object?
Speaking of Disney, the people that brought you ESPN Mobile are launching Disney Mobile, targeted at families with smaller children. The era of the Mobile Virtual Network Operator is upon us!
Beck Guero
White Stripes Elephant
Wilco Yankee Hotel Foxtrot
Wilco A Ghost is Born
Carlos Guitarlos Straight from the Heart
Scientifically, I think the astronomers made the right decision. Emotionally, I am genuinely bummed.
As to Pluto, it's been a planet since 1930, and it's still only made it about a third of the way around the solar system in all that time. It's slower than Jason Phillips. It was time to cut it from the roster.
We're not selling bluejeans, here. We're choosing planets.
"No proposal to change the status of Pluto as the ninth planet in the solar system has been made by any Division, Commission or Working Group of the IAU responsible for solar system science. Lately, a substantial number of smaller objects have been discovered in the outer solar system, beyond Neptune, with orbits and possibly other properties similar to those of Pluto. It has been proposed to assign Pluto a number in a technical catalogue or list of such Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) so that observations and computations concerning these objects can be conveniently collated. This process was explicitly designed to not change Pluto's status as a planet."
Pluto otherwise wishes to make clear the fact that it is a planet, since it has satellites and is otherwise massive enough to retain an atmosphere [tenuous, but still an atmosphere]. And management brings up this lame concept of orbit. Orbit, shmorbit, who really cares? And Pluto's satellites are Charon, Nix, and Hydra. In their devious and despicable efforts to defame Pluto, management had previously reported that Pluto and Charon might be a "binary planet" system, but Pluto wishes to make clear, as management must now admit, that Charon does not have an atmosphere. Charon is otherwise Pluto's child, created long ago when some massive object collided with the then proto-Pluto. Pluto wishes to also make clear that in its continuing efforts to defame him, management has rather convenienty ignored that the mechanism of Charon's creation was precisely that same mechansim that gave rise to the earth's moon, but yet we don't hear management reporting that it wishes to downgrade the earth's status. Lastly, this entity called the Baltimore Sun, and Pluto will forgive the name, but the Baltimore Sun at least sees that the lame and pathetic attempt unjustly accuse and malign Pluto:
http://tinyurl.com/zzm4d
And, yes, Pluto is indeed here, a sphere, and so management need get used to it...
George Steinbrenner was quoted as saying "Insignificant-added nothing to the solar system-more profits for the rest of the SSA"(Solar System Association)!! It was learned that Jupiter (Yankees) would take two of Pluto's satellites for a minor asteroid to be named later.
Pluto also wishes to direct the attention of humanity to Dr. Bojan Pecnik, who correctly reports that the planet-defining criteria ought to simply be whether or not the object in question has the ability to retain an atmosphere and otherwise orbits the sun [and not some other planet, like that pretender named Triton]. The gravitational dominance of one's orbital zone, which is the misguided mantra of those so set on falsely denigrating Pluto, otherwise speaks only to the dynamics of Pluto's surrounding environment and says nothing at all about Pluto's intrinsic physical property. Pluto would simply ask the arrogant defamers whether they have any idea, even an inkling, of how it hard it is for tiny Pluto to retain an atmosphere as against the vacuum that is interplanetary space?
Pluto otherwise wishes to express its solidarity with Mercury, which does not have an atmosphere, but has the ability to retain one, and so Mercury stands as an appreciated and welcome member of the planetary club. Pluto otherwise has no objection to Ceres and Xena being added to that club. Pluto also appreciates and is otherwise humbled by the efforts of those who conducted the "Save Pluto" campaign. Lastly, Pluto takes immeasurable pride in the fact that it will soon be assuming its rightful role as the resting place of the ashes of Clyde Tombaugh, the "discover" of Pluto. Power to the people!
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.