Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
In a story topped by the news of the Dodgers' one-year contract offer to relief pitcher Trevor Hoffman, Bill Shaikin of the Times reports that 2009 season ticket sales for the team remain strong.
The Dodgers will meet or beat their season-ticket sales from last year even if they do not sign Ramirez, chief operating officer Dennis Mannion said.
The club projects to sell about 24,000 season tickets, the same as last year, he said. The sales pace is ahead of last year, he said, citing the Dodgers' first trip to the NL championship series in 20 years and the price freeze on season tickets.
Renewal payments are due Friday, and Mannion said he does not expect the uncertainty over Ramirez to impact most of the roughly 10% of accounts still outstanding.
"We've had plenty of 'Hope you sign Manny' but not 'You won't see a penny from me if you don't,' " Mannion said.
Still, he said, the Dodgers probably could sell another 2,000 season seats if they do sign Ramirez. At the average ticket price of $29.66, according to Team Marketing Report, plus the roughly $17 that each fan spends on food, drink and parking, those additional 2,000 seats would translate into about $7.5 million in gross revenue.
Would the last 2,000 season seats available average out to $30/game seats? I don't know.
Anyway, there's the added factor of whether some season tickets go un-used if the team doesn't sign Ramirez, thus shaving food, parking and concession income, but based on the above, I don't see the Dodgers' overall regular-season revenue for 2009 declining compared to 2008, in which they went without Ramirez for four months.
The year-to-year data on luxury suite sales might be interesting to see.
* * *
As for Hoffman, there was some detailed discussion of his value in Tuesday night's comments, beginning at the 307 mark. Hoffman's ERA was 5.08 in the first half of 2008, 1.59 in the second half, which perhaps illustrates nothing more than the ineffectiveness of ERA as a measuring tool for relief pitchers, but could also help account for the difference of opinion on him.
I'm not someone who tends to think the Dodgers need to spend mid-seven figures on a 41-year-old reliever, but I would also go as far to say as, if you put money aside, Hoffman probably would help more than he would hurt.
Beyond that, as much as I've supported Jonathan Broxton as the Dodger closer, I won't get up in arms if he goes back to being an eighth-inning pitcher, because the closer designation itself doesn't mean much to me. Often the most important work for the bullpen comes before the ninth inning, which means that Broxton would get much meaningful use. And as some have pointed out, if you keep Broxton's save totals down, you might keep his potential future earnings down (in, say, a salary arbitration hearing) - and so in a twisted fashion, Hoffman's presence would mitigate his own cost.
So close. Yet so far.
323. 68elcamino427
The home run stat from last season is not anomalous -
it's no more "fast" on the fastball.
Per Fangraphs:
Average Speed of Hoffman's Fastball
2005: 85.4
2006: 84.6
2007: 85.1
2008: 86.0
Hoffman's fastball last season was the fastest it's been in the last four years.
If there's anything to his decline (whether real or not) a better gauge might be the difference between his fastball and changeup:
2005: 11.4
2006: 11.2
2007: 11.3
2008: 11.5
Looks about the same to me. Just about the only thing I can see different from Hoffman's 2008 in terms of pitch selection was his increased use of the slider last year:
% of Pitches That Were Sliders
2005: 3.4%
2006: 5.6%
2007: 6.0%
2008: 9.7%
I'm not sure I would sign Hoffman, but I'm not totally opposed to it either. He's still an effective pitcher.
Oops
I'm pretty sure the player's union frowns upon such a thing. They prefer a "pay now, ask questions later" approach.
I found pitches for 6 of the 8 HR given up by Hoffman:
April 2
Fastball (Lance Berkman)
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/recap?gid=280402125
April 23
Changeup (Bengie Molina)
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/recap?gid=280423125
May 23
Fastball (Adam Dunn)
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/recap?gid=280523125
June 24
Fastball (Brendan Harris)
Fastball (Brian Buscher)
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/recap?gid=280624125
July 5
Fastball (Stephen Drew)
http://tinyurl.com/83g5a6
I searched game stories for the other 2 HR and couldn't find any mention of the pitch.
So I guess it's not really possible to determine whether or not he gave up more HRs last year because of throwing different pitches than in the past...
I would think that they would. The median price might be far lower but the average price can spike pretty quickly with many season seats costing $90 and some costing $400. With Season seats generally being better than the others, I would guess that the $29.66 figure is for single game and not season tickets.
From the Team Marketing Report:
Average ticket price represents a weighted average of season ticket prices for general seating categories, determined by factoring the tickets in each price range as a percentage of the total number of seats in each venue. Premium seating (tickets that come with at least one added amenity or is classified by team as premium) are not included in the survey to calculate average ticket price. Luxury suites are also excluded from the survey. Season ticket pricing is used for any team that offers some or all tickets at lower prices for customers who buy season seats. Teams have say in what seats are considered general or premium
http://tinyurl.com/a4js4f (this is a PDF with 2008 data for each team)
Career runs: 1 (1995)
Career hits: 5
Career doubles: 2
Career RBI: 5
The last time he appears to have batted was 2001.
I just renewed yesterday
Los Angeles Dodgers fans could have a new reason to stick around for the ninth inning
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3815497
Molly, have you had any bad experiences from Hoffman while reporting, or is your ire more of the "Hoffman isn't worth the money" variety?
Secondly, while the economy is bad, many of those who would renew still have enough money to afford it.
And if you don't renew, you lose your seat location for X number of years.
It just doesn't surprise me that out of the entire population of Los Angeles, 24,000 season tickets for the Dodgers will still get sold.
I think I won't be happy, but I am not sure yet. I need to see the total figure and to know if it will keep us from signing better or cheaper talent
To be fair, I reduced my number of tickets from 8 to 5. So, I renewed, but there are less of us coming to the games.
I am willing to be the bullpen catcher for cheap.
You'd think the Dodgers were close to signing Todd Jones or Joe Borowski or something. Hoffman is still an effective pitcher.
Would I sign him? No.
Is his signing a bad thing? Not necessarily.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/01/perrotto-on-and.html
So, Druw gets his money and gets to go back to where he wants to be.
Just seems like a waste of money.
Plus, it'll be really surreal to see Hoffman closing out games for the Dodgers. I dont think I want to see it just as a fan.
Be almost as surreal as Barry in LF.
Yep. And the Boras/Jones victory over the Dodgers is complete.
Cordero seems like more of an injury risk than Saito.
From MLB.com:
Cordero carries very high risk, but could deliver a nice reward to the team that signs him. He underwent surgery on July 8 to repair a torn labrum in his right shoulder, a significant procedure that can require 9-12 months of rehabilitation, but a source close to Cordero said he is on a course to be pitching off a mound in February and is aiming to be pitching competitively by Opening Day
I wouldn't expect anything out of Cordero until June at the earliest. If the Dodgers weren't willing to pay to wait for Saito, they probably won't do the same for Cordero.
You're going to cheat Tanyon Sturtze out of a job?
http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/psplit.cgi?n1=hoffmtr01&year=2008#locat-hmvis
Home: 29 2/3 IP, 28 H+W, 29 K, 7 HR, 4.25 ERA, .656 OPS, .208 BABIP
Away: 15 2/3 IP, 19 H+W, 19 K, 1 HR, 2.87 ERA, .658 OPS, .359 BABIP
I think a 42yr old Hoffman is equilavlent to signing Jones/Borowski
Good thing we aren't signing him for 2010 then (when he's 42). :)
So I'm with wronghanded and Molly. Bad idea. GoBears not happy.
The only upside I can see is the one that Jon alluded to and that Bob Hendley mentioned near the end of the comments to the last post: That IF Torre insists that Hoffman is the 9th-inning save guy, that might optimize the use of the better pitchers. The Tigers did this a couple years ago, with the "closer" (Todd Jones)the worst of the three pitchers slotted for innings 7-8-9, and the better guys (I think it was Rodney and Zumaya) pitching the highest-leverage innings most of the time.
So, if Colletti's mistaken signing is followed by Torre making the correct usage decision for the wrong reasons (proven closers close), this might work out OK. Of course, for that to be true, the Dodgers would also have to get to the 9th inning with 3-run leads instead of 1-run leads. So they still would be better off spending that money on offense.
Ah well... Anyway... what's new on the Manny front?
If signing Hoffman doesn't preclude the club from addressing it's other needs, does that change anyone's opinion of the signing?
Just wondering. I don't necessarily want Hoffman either, but I seem stuck in the bhsportsguy zone of defending something because I think the counter arguments are weak.
Technically, yes, but I don't think he's allowed to guo there, er, go there, anymore...
Cruz costs a first round pick..i don't think Hoffman costs a draft pick.
But comparisons to Andruw Jones just don't fly.
Those numbers are just plain weird...
A 4.25 ERA with a .208 BABIP at home and a 2.87 ERA with a .359 BABIP away. Just bizarre.
Hoffman may still be very effective. Great. But the millions that are going to be spent him could have instead been spent on Manny and a SP.
What makes this even more aggravating is that the Dodgers have proven in recent years that they're quite adept at finding hidden bullpen gems for next to nothing, like Saito, Beimel, Wade, Troncoso, etc.
I dont think they can make that determination at this time - bc they dont know what Manny or a Starting Pitcher will cost.
That being said, I really want Stults to be on the team, and I really hope that J-Mac gets a look at the back end of the 'pen, because as much as I like him as a starter, I was really, really impressed by his relief work in the playoffs.
http://sportsblogs.latimes.com/sports_baseball_dodgers/2009/01/manny-ramirez-t.html
I think it was much more of a Petco effect than a Hoffman effect, but point taken.
The Dodgers didnt even want to offer Beimel arbitration bc they feared they may have to pay 4mils to him instead of 2mils.
Its the mid-level PVL salaries that can add up fast and prevent the team from pursuing better targets, or forcing them to deal prospects.
But we had enough money to give Andruw Jones $18 million a year, and then, all of a sudden, less than a year later, we're trading Carlos Santana to save $2 million.
Trevor Hoffman is a past-his-prime PVL who may still be good, but may not be either. He has a recognizable name and his signing will cause a splash with the local media.
A bigger piece of Ned-bait, I've never seen.
I am not much for signing a "winner" just because he happened to be on a good team a few times. I also think that the Dodgers stink at signing veteran leaders (see Gonzalez, Luis).
However, having Kuo, Broxton, McDonald, Stults, Wade, etc. in the bullpen with no decent veteran guys out there could be a bad idea. Hoffman may not be the answer, but the effect of a knowledgable veteran in the clubhouse who is a decent guy can sometimes be understated. Almost every young pitcher who ever came in contact with Greg Maddux raves about the experience.
I am not convinced that Hoffman is the answer to this supposed dilemma, but confidence among a group of youths is a funny and fragile thing. Someone like Hoffman on a one year deal, provided it does not screw around with any other signings could be a very good thing after Broxton and Wade have a couple of bad games in a row sometime in August.
Let us dream: Billingsly, Kershaw, Kuroda, McDonald, Kuo.
Cette ardente flamme qui d'Hoffmann jadis embrasa les sens!
[sings soprano]
If it occurs, and does not stand in the way of a quality SP & LF signing, Kavula Industries will rate the signing as a positive.
If, say, no left fielder is signed, and the reaction of the front office is something like, "Sure, we didn't get Manny, but hey look everybody we're playing Hell's Bells," then Kavula Industries will take a dim view.
This comment contains forward-looking statements and should not be reviewed by anyone or his financial advisors.
Just imagine the arm action that looks like 96 MPH but comes out as 83. Unstoppable.
This Andruw deal, to me, says we're trying to scrape up every dollar we can get right now.
And If we're scraping up money, I'd rather not throw 7-8 million at Hoffman.
Personally, I'd take Reyes over Hoffman. We'd still be bringing in a veteran arm to the pen, but we could still close by committee.
From a nostalgia standpoint, I dont want Hoffman playing anywhere else, but his value to us is not worth what he wants because an old closer is not of real value to us, even if an old Brian Giles supposedly is, which I dont get. He has more value to the Dodgers. I just dont get why we continue to do nothing to improve our team.
Can you see Hoffman closing out the final LCS or World Series game for the Dodgers. Its kind of like us Kings fans watching Luc Robitaille hoist the Stanley Cup in Detroit. Mixed feelings.
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=504461
>>This is not to suggest that Boras planted the Ramirez-to-San Francisco item with a compliant media lackey to help his negotiating position. But at the very least, the timing was odd.
The Dodgers are the only team known to have made an offer to Ramirez. With that offer off the table, the Dodgers began to consider other hitters, such as Dunn. A couple weeks earlier, Angels general manager Tony Reagins changed the dynamics of the Manny sweepstakes by announcing his club would not pursue the outfielder.
So, Ramirez stands on the outside, waiting for attention that is not coming.
Suddenly, the Giants reportedly crash into the picture.
If form had held, the next step would have been the Dodgers leaping into action, repenting for their ways and making a bigger offer that would enable them to bring back Ramirez.
Not this time.<<
It spends its nights, my large friend Hoffmann. This burning flame which d' Hoffmann formerly set ablaze the directions.
What? Oh, you mean Denny Reyes? He's still in baseball?
Haven't said it, but you have my favorite name on the site :)
At this point, I'll be stunned if this signing doesn't happen.
94 Believe it or not, Reyes is only 31. Seems like so long ago that we traded him, but he got his start with us at age 21.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=3686
Who knows, though. Maybe Hoffman signs on and magically starts throwing 94 like Chan Ho.
Hate is a strong word..for instance: I hate Barry Bonds.
I just merely 'dislike' Hoffman. Although reading all the dialogue here has tilted me a bit toward being ok with the signing as long as Hoffman has a Maddux-esque role as teacher.
From the very beginning, when he sings of the dwarf Kleinzach, I was enchanted.
Tales of Hoffmann is my favorite opera.
I guess that's better than paying a non-player 4 million to teach our clubhouse how to get along.
Besides the laziness of playing the "LA fans leave early" card, anybody that thinks Hoffman is going to keep butts in the seats is delusional.
People want excitement from their closer. The only excitement Hoffman will give us is the kind generated from allowing a constant stream of baserunners in the 9th inning. Admittedly, we have been lucky in the last few years, with the buzz that Gagne (juiced up or not he provided the biggest sense of anticipation I have ever experienced at a baseball game) and Saito generated.
Simply having a good entry song isn't going to make us magically forget that our "closer" is tossing batting practice junk.
See people use the double N for that, but for my name, no!
One of my wishes is for Ryan Leaf to somehow improbably come out of retirement and lead the Raiders to the Super Bowl. The double gut punch for San Diego fans would be something to savor.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3815497
Too bad Offenbach is dead. John Adams is available, though.
The only excitement Hoffman will give us is the kind generated from allowing a constant stream of baserunners in the 9th inning
Trevor Hoffman, 2008
IP: 45.1
Baserunners: 47
I am opposed to Dodger relievers whose first names start "D-vowel-n" and end in "nys".
Only Rhys Darby saves the whole "name that ends in YS" group from complete scorn.
That was before Rodriguez and Fuentes signed for not too much more than that per year and are more than 10 years younger.
I think that $5M will be the figure that Ned goes for.
Stated poorly: What I meant was that his perceived value may be in the $8M range, but his actual contract will be much lower IMO.
Who would have thought that none of the Bradley/Ibanez/Burrell triumverate would get more than $11M annually?
Can you ask Magneto his opinion of a potential Trevor Hoffman signing so we can settle this thing?
The statistics back you up, but I am going to continue on my somewhat irrational campaign against Hoffman. I think if you Babel translate Hoffman back and forth from Swahili a few times, it ends up spelling Jeff Shaw (whose WHIP was also pretty solid but that doesn't prevent me from trying to purge all memory of him as a Dodger closer).
It would be something like this: Sir Ian, Sir Ian, Sir Ian, action, wizard "You shall not pass!", cut. Sir Ian, Sir Ian, Sir Ian.
vr, Xei
I am prepared to be corrected.
People usually don't mispronounce my name. I really only get irritated about it when they copy it down wrong after they see it in print.
For example, I will email someone and my name will be in the signature. Then they will reply and leave the extra N off.
When I've gone to Germany, no one has ever asked me how to spell my name there. They just write it down. And it's never been misspelled when I've gone to Japan, which I assume is because people there wouldn't know how to misspell it.
No: the second to the last "n" is silent.
Clothing: comfortable, casual, loose; enough for 9 days (no washer/dryer); some exercise clothing; one outfit for a casual festive occasion; jackets/sweaters for evening. Alarm clock. Warm clothes, an umbrella and rubber-soled shoes as the season dictates.
Though I still smell one more veteran SP signing before all is said and done.
Though we do have Vargas waiting in the wings!
135 - genius moment, maybe only rivaled by Patrick Stewart's upcoming movie.
The T, I, second M, E, and R are all silent, but the first M is pronounced as "TIM" and the final "MANN" is pronounced as "MERMAN"
Every day a young Doris Kearns would hurry from school to tell her father that the bison had moved further east on Long Island. But it turns out that her father already worked in bison control for the county of Nassau and was just humoring her.
Right now, I predict an OD rotation of: Billingsley, Kuroda, Kershaw, Vargas, McDonald, with Stults as the 6th.
Over/under on Kershaw's innings next season - 150?
http://tinyurl.com/a55zuc
I found this note interesting:
As is often the case with guys like this, we'll have to see if the club's policy against performance bonuses will prove to be a hurdle in negotiations
As far as I can tell, the only D-Back with a performance bonus in his contract is Brandon Webb, whose 2010 buyout increased by $500k for each Top 5 CYA finish from 2006-2009. It probably won't increase his overall payout though, since his $8.5m 2010 option is certain to be exercised.
Circus Vargas?
Nice. BTW: I've been wondering about circuses lately. IIRC, when I was a kid, my town was visited annually by no fewer than 3 different circi (Vargas, Ringling Brothers, and Barnum & Bailey). I somehow always knew when the circus was coming to town.
But as an adult, I never see any advertisements for the circus, and never actually see one set up or anything.
Did they go out of favor, or am I just out of the loop?
Which is, Patton Oswalt says, "catnip for old people!"
The French Canadians have taken over the circus industry.
I say: let them have it.
I wonder if Vargas could be a leage average SP at Dodger stadium. The last 3 years he K's 6.64 per 9 IP and BB+HBP-IBB 3.3 per 9 IP. Reduce his 1.54 HR per 9 IP maybe to 1.1 and his FIP ERA is about 4.35.
Circuses have come under fire for animal cruelty over the years, and they aren't as exciting as video/computer games.
When I think about those bears I saw as a boy, chained to scooters, riding in a circle, it does seem a bit unnatural.
I think Ringling Bros/Barnum and Bailey is still around, though, like the Globetrotters.
http://www.circusvargas.org/showtimesN.html
Here's hoping he signs with the Brewers, for a number of reasons.
I guess I am one of the few here who don't buy into what players say about hating this team or that team, in the end they play for whomever is paying them and they don't really get into the rivalry as much as fans do.
*SportsNation Jim Callis : Sure. From best to worst: Giants, Rockies, Dodgers, Diamondbacks, Padres. The Giants have an elite system, while all the rest are in the 20-30 range for me.
http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=24443
http://www.crookedpitch.com/439/the-fantasy-five-dodger-questions-with-marc-hershberg/
Should have just used Kemp.
However, as we know, life does not always conform with fantasy. Or vice versa.
Al Davis missed the last Raiders game in Tampa, presumably due to his failing bones. he is, after all, 958 years old
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/8996778/Davis-misses-his-first-Raiders-game-since-%2779-
--but listen to this... What I didn't know is that Davis had a Chick Hearn streak going... observe:
Herrera said he believes the only time Davis ever missed a game was when his wife, Carole, was hospitalized in 1979 after a heart attack. Davis moved into the hospital for more than two weeks until she came out of a coma and recovered.
Other than that, Davis is not believed to have missed a Raiders game since joining the organization in 1963.
He's not kidding when he says "Commitment to Excellence". Of course, now, Davis is simply committed.
Whatever.
:)
How does Chun-Li look?
-- forgive me, fellas...
Pretty much just showed her as a ninja or in street clothes flipping around.
No original Chun Li clothing or cool moves in preview. Everyone in the preview just wore regular clothes and fought in them.
Wait, the movie is called "The Legend of Chun Li"? I still think it would work better as an adult film.
No, nothing cool. M. Bison just fits in his suit and looks absolutely nothing like M. Bison.
Still can't be worse than the Dragonball movie though.
Only if they have old titles starring Lynn Minmay.
Forget the name, Hoffman had a 9.9 K/G ratio last year, he is still effective. Would signing him be some great thing, no. Does signing him make our team better at low risk/cost, yes. 5 million is not overpaying him and keeps Broxton's arb numbers down, while adding a leader in the bullpen if you value that. I just don't see the rational arguement against getting him on a cheap one year deal unless it keeps us from getting Manny or a SP.
HELLS BELLS!!! THAT'S WHY!!!
I remember when Robotech was on PBS.
Lynn Minmay was my second cartoon character crush. First was Penny from Inspector Gadget.
I vote yes.
What the heck is up with a 7:30pm Sunday start?
Presumably the Lakers aren't playing Sunday night.
I'm not married to the idea of Broxton as a closer. But like so many others have said, I'd rather give the ball to Broxton/Kuo/McDonald, or whoever else matches up well in a specific situation than pay millions of dollars to an over-the-hill pitcher who used to be a dominant closer.
Anyone who has ever played fantasy baseball knows closers are made, not born. Our throwing this kind of money at Hoffman when we've been reluctant to loosen the purse strings on other free agents (lately) is confusing. If we sign Hoffman for anywhere near the amount the Rays signed Burrell I will cry.
Does that mean I have to refer to Voltron as Lionbot?
Never saw the original series.
Managers and GMs like closers because it makes life much easier. The Red Sox tried to go with a committee when Theo took over and partly because of managerial usage (Grady) but somewhat due to the players available (Theo), it did not work. Then they got Foulke and later Pappelton (sp.) to fill that closer role.
Also Brian Fuentes signed for little more than Burrell makes and I can't see the Dodgers paying that much to Hoffman.
Finally, I think for whatever reason, managers and GMs view a closer more important than a player like Pat Burrell.
Seriously, probably more to do with TV time slots and that the women's team plays at Pauley earlier that day.
Dodgers need to find a GM/manager that doesnt think like that then.
I am surprised Bob didn't catch that.
But if they throw most of it for 1yr of Trevor Hoffman, I have to question what they are thinking.
Would there be a worse way to spend $6mils, than on an old closer?
Really, I'm serious here, its not as if the Dodgers do anything really that different in terms of player personnel than the vast majority of teams. Even teams that have so-called advanced thinking still operate with this mentality otherwise you would see teams use their bullpen on the basis of the situation rather than the inning that pitcher is being used in.
My point about Burrell is rather flip, there is no doubt that an everyday player can affect more games than a pitcher who may pitch in 45% of the games. But in the last 25 years (thanks Tony LaRussa), there is no doubt that a manager's best friend is the guy who pitches the 9th inning.
It will take someone with a lot of guts and vision to change that but I don't see that happening anytime soon.
They could reasonably ask for: 6M, 4M, 2.5M, .75M
I think they'll settle for roughly 80% of those figures.
Talk about a charismatic guy to have for a documentary
If our offer is close to the Brewers, than he will be coming our way. It will be interesting to watch him come out to close a game in SD
I don't remember who my first famous crush was. Probably Princess Leia circa Return of the Jedi.
There is apparently a band named after the television show. I was talking about the cartoon, but I am listening to their music now it is pretty cool.
You need to use an iExacto and iGlue.
iThankyou
Waiting for Tommy to come on 570 at 2p. I do not remember Hartman being this wild and loud back on the Loose Cannons. Wow, he is almost as irritating as Vic.
What are we paying Joe Torre all that money for when the GMs and agents can do his job for him?
To bad Trevor Bell the ex high draft pick of the Angels didn't get traded to the Padres. You could have had
Trevor Hoffman
Heath Bell
Trevor Bell
Those who are arguing for Hoffman, I can understand your point except for the money. As Joey says, it would be pointless to restructure A Jones contract to create some flexibility, and then blow that flexibility on Trevor Hoffman. I have no doubt he'll be effective in 2009 but we don't need him. It would be wasted money unless he's signed for two million or less and that is not going to happen.
Joe than takes the contract and proceeds to...well, you know the rest.
I would also like later in the season, after a series of righty-lefty matchups with Hoffman & Kuo switching between LF and P, Hoffman calls timeout and runs in to the mound from LF to talk to Kuo. "I only got one thing to say to you, Kuo. Strike this [guy (said in a different voice)] out."
Those would be my 2nd & 3rd favorite moments of the year, topped only by the moment in spring training when Juan Pierre mutters "we should have gotten a live chicken," then looks over to see a grease-covered Andruw Jones sitting over a now-empty bucket of KFC.
Wow...that had me laughing at the end. Especially seeing Pierre as Serrano
Your real name never struck me as a glam rocker name. Maybe the manager of a glam rocker...
I once made a girl fall for me by singing the Jem theme, from memory, on a first date.
"Glamor and glitter, fashion and fame...Jem!"
You mean Pierre as Willie Mays Hays! Andruw was playing the role of Cerrano.
Apparently "Major League" is to Eric like "Animal House" is to me
Do you cry at the end of Animal House?
Well, he was interviewed on an Indiana TV station There's a recap here, though I can't find a link to the video itself.
http://www.14wfie.com/Global/story.asp?S=9633433&nav=menu54_4
I got a new strategy.
"The Indians win it, the Indians win it, oh my God, the Indians win it" gets me every time. Cue the Randy Newman music and Rene Russo holding up a ringless finger and it's all over!
http://www.sportshubla.com/2009/01/03/dodgers-hit-a-home-run-in-real-estate/
I don't think Ted understands the The McCourts have to keep up with the Buss's, Moreno's, and Sterlings who are not your normal wealthy LA patron.
If only Warren Buffet had been a Dodger fan. A classy investor who doesn't flaunt being one of the wealthiest people on earth.
http://tinyurl.com/9lwe5v
Cheeseburger in paradise...
Be curious no more.
[Frank McCourt, reading DT:]
Buffet? Sure, we can lay out a buffet. All the Dodger Dogs you can eat! All the Coke you can drink!
But that'll come with a cost. Dodger fans have to ask themselves whether they want a free agent left fielder or a Dodger Dog.
http://tinyurl.com/7ykwvl
Lots of rule 1 violations.
After only reading a few paragraphs, I can say that guy needs a therapist.
http://www.fannation.com/si_blogs/hot_stove/posts/38741
Forgot the link...http://tinyurl.com/7k3kuw
That is how he is able to spend so much time at a fine establishment like Hooters.
Does this logic make sense to anyone else?
Will there be some kind of enforcement mechanism written into his contract that could guarantee such a thing?
I don't get particularly annoyed when rich people buy expensive and over the top things. Also, the claim that the Dodgers can't afford Manny and CC because they bought these properties is completely baseless.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kkJPiTIyZ8
Or maybe a counter balance to his hellish Padre days, Trevor could come out to "Just Like Heaven."
*This is an idealized, theoretical sort of Buffett, because we all know he's not leaving Omaha.
They could rename the rightfield pavilion the "Warren Buffet".
Excellent.
I am surprised they ever make money.
vr, Xei
Also without a Michael.
Jamie=Gangee
various McCourt sons=Gob and Buster
Ned Colletti= definitely Barry Zuckercorn
And thus the foundation of 95% of all parenting crises in 9 simple words.
All of this great analysis comes from Buster Olney:
Dodgers need a starter. Must count on Martin, Kemp, and Ethier. Must find a closer whether Broxton or Hoffman. Must count on Bills and Kershaw who are good but very young. Joe Torre could reach record 14th post season in a row.
CC, Teix, Jeter, A-Rod, Posada and Rivera must justify salaries with great years. Burnett, Matsuda and Damon have to remain injury free. Wang and Cano must bounce back. Girardi could win Yanks first World Series in the 21st century or be fired for failing to do so.
He could be used in ties or down 1 in the late innings, or earlier than the 9th in a tough spot facing for example the 3-4-5 hitters rather than waiting for 7-8-9 or something like that in the 9th. He could be used less with a 3-run lead to start the 9th.
I don't know if it had been discussed here, but Timmy basically said the same old song about how he didn't believe there was another bidder for Manny besides the Dodgers. He did sound fairly confident that Hoffman was going to stay West with the Dodgers.
Take everything with a grain of salt, but Kurkijan is a little better than the rest I like to believe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQAT2rKugIs
314 He also is a very nice person who took 30 seconds to chat with me in Las Vegas when he didn't have to do that.
Also, Hoffman would be a completely uninspiring signing.
In semi-3-D!
You gotta be kidding me. Don Fehr should be fired for this alone.
http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2009/01/gammonss_take.html
I don't want to put words in Xeifrank's mouth, but maybe he meant that if one is to use the bullpen roles as currently constructed, in general the 9th inning "closer" role is more optimal than the setup role in total, even though there are certainly times when bringing in the "relief ace" earlier would be more prudent.
Shades of Richie Phillips and the great umpire mass resignation backfire?
Wow... that is a GOOD question. You know what though? You could ask this of a lot of MLB teams these days.
What was the last big free agent Baltimore, Minnesota, or St. Louis signed (not counting the home growns like Albert Pujols) since 2000?
I was pretty pumped about the J.D. Drew deal, but I would not call the general fan reaction inspiring.
Owner, Los Angeles Dodgers, "Dodger Stadium: The Next 50 Years"
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Noon Luncheon Program with Q&A
Millennium Biltmore Hotel
http://tinyurl.com/9v9u2v
Who is Jamie's role model, Saddam Hussein?
Wow...
vr, Xei
http://tinyurl.com/7zchz8
or to use exact phrasing, "not a bad alternative"
Of course, I would've thrown in a food or movie analogy, packaging my response to the DT demographic
I often use focus groups to test out my posts before hitting submit. :)
I think i'll slither away now
1. Jason Schmidt
2. Andruw Jones
3. Jeff Kent
4. J.D. Drew
By doing that, they did two things, eliminated themselves from paying more money for lesser players and then caused other teams to just sit back and say, well Derek Lowe is not CC so I am not spending my money on him.
Add the facta that teams that would have gladly given up picks in the past like the Giants are more hesitant to do so (Manny will be a test for them) and that after CC and Teixeira, the market was just not that great.
Rafael Furcal
Andruw Jones
J.D. Drew
Bill James wants you to boycott the BCS.
Odalis Perez
Andruw Jones
Then, the first time I saw him pitch, he gave up two HR's in the first inning...to the Pirates. Then threw to first base on a comebacker. With the bases loaded. And no outs.
That was the end of the night for him...
Also Furcal and Schmidt
>> The smart money remains on Ramirez staying with the Dodgers, maybe getting less than the $40 million over two years from the options that he demanded be dropped when he was traded. But L.A. might be able to win the NL West again while spending less money on Adam Dunn, letting its young players develop and using some leftover money for pitching. Remember that Dodgers owner Frank McCourt has a reputation among his team's fans for being cheap, and that Ramirez didn't cost him a dime for the two months he spent at Chavez Ravine. <<
## "Gas is up, and so am I," Ramirez said in October. But now gas is down, and apparently so is he. The longer he stays on the market, the more it seems that Ramirez might be the greatest $16-18 million-per-year bargain in the history of, well, $16-18 million-per-year bargains. ##
http://tinyurl.com/75u74r
I thought the Drew deal was terrific (still do). For Furcal and Brown, I thought they might have been too expensive, but I certainly loved the additions to the team. For Kent, I had a hard time getting past his Giant-ness, but couldn't argue with his bat.
I thought the signings of Perez, Valentin, and Jones were risky but worth it, and I was wrong in all three cases.
Uh... if you say so ...
>> The Memphis Grizzlies have traded a 2012 conditional second-round draft pick to the Miami Heat in exchange for guard Shaun Livingston and cash. <<
http://tinyurl.com/9sxsey
Diving into first base (and, to a lesser extent, any base) is probably the single dumbest thing any baseball player can do in the ordinary course of a game.
If Raul Mondesi's rant about Kevin Malone, however, had come during a game, that would have been...
No, wait. That would have been way smarter. In fact, way, way smarter.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117998166.html
Mr. Collins, I believe. One of the most memorable characters on the show. His episodes were among the best.
No, I'll give you that one. Also, I'll concede Psycho dropping his pants. What I meant was, a thing that a player might actually do, without prompting Vinny to injure himself laughing, or Joe Torre to lose control of his bladder.
Come to think of it, I may need to re-think my parameters. But this is the smartest baseball place on the WEB; you guys know what I meant. Don't you?
Valet Parking $18
Don't you hate it when you try to provoke an interesting (or at least comical) discussion and the boss intervenes with important business that requires intelligent discussion?
I saw him at the old version of Gus's Bar-B-Q the first time I went there. I also saw Robert Reed there that day.
The latter looked unwell.
If your question is about stealing 3rd as often as 2nd, I guess the usual answer is that it's a shorter throw for the catcher, so the runner has less time. Morgan (or someone) is always going on about how stealing 3rd is easier than 2nd, either because you can get a bigger lead or because a RH batter can help out (I forget which), but it would be a HUGE unexploited market inefficiency if that were generally true (which makes me think that it isn't true).
I'm always worried about whether to type "Red Sock" or "Red Sox" in the singular.
"The motto 'And ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free' is inscribed in the lobby of what agency's headquarters?"
A. FBI
B. CIA
C. Dep't of Education
D. Library of Congress
(million dollar question coming right up . . .)
On the bright side, he's strong in The Force.
His phone a friend gave the wrong answer and that question and he decided to go with his own gut and got it right . . .
A. Meat Inspector
B. Mail deliverer
C. Historian
D. Weapons Mechanic
Congratulations Kevin Smith.
Meredith is giddy. It's the first million dollar winner on her show.
Houston up by 2 with 43.8 left in the 4th.
The word is mitrochondrial, not mitochondrian and it turned out that Baldelli didn't have a mitochondrial disorder after all.
https://griddle.baseballtoaster.com/archives/1189143.html
Sure, Hoffman can demand the closer role, the Dodgers give it to him without an audition, and then season starts, and the circumstances takes it from there. Its not as if players like Juan Pierre or Andruw Jones could put that they had to be the starting center fielder in their contract.
>> The Dodgers will learn Thursday whether Trevor Hoffman will be their closer this year.
Rick Thurman, the agent for Hoffman, said via text message this afternoon that the pitcher "will be making [his] decision tomorrow." <<
http://tinyurl.com/8kq45h
He's calling his mom now.
2-6 in their last 8.
I remember the Bill Simmons pre-Christmas podcast (Celts were 26-2) in which he decided they were a lock to beat the '96 Bulls record of 72-10. Awesome.
I am not sure if I could handle it actually.
Millionaire answers:
385 B
388 A
That seems highly speculative at best. It has been reported that the Dodgers (and the Brewers) offered Hoffman over $4 million, yet he didn't immediately accept their offer.
The only circumstance where this doesn't hold true is the circumstance of waste [and by waste, I mean a wasted chance to pitch that we can't and won't get back]. Such explains why, even when there's no hold/save situation, we bring in the dominant reliever when there's an off day following [and so, fine, not his maximized use, but better lesser use than no use at all].
Chris Paul and David West have great games okay, I can live with that.
But Von Wafer.
Now watch the Warriors beat the Lakers.
in the early to mid 80's they had 3-4 innings closers didn't they? I heard Jon talk about it.
To quote Tommy "what are you a smart guy!!" :o)
That is not happening. The Warriors are terrible.
The Rays basically did this for the playoffs. You need multiple relievers that can pitch multiple innings, an understanding that there is no set roles, only situations where your skill set can help the team, and also apprently, relying on David Pryce.
I guess that's not a good thing . . . ?
426 Very true.
Did you become momentarily incapacitated?
Now you've invaded my dreams!!! ;)
She admits she has daddy issues.
If only I had the good looks of Salman Rushdie.
435
People I have met who were not a disappointment:
1. Kristi Yamaguchi
2. Mike Haynes
3. Tim Kurkijan
4. Several Dodgers I met last year at the luncheons including Steve Garvey, Bobby Welch, Rick Monday, Jerry Reuss, Mike Davis and Rudy Law.
People who apparently had a bad day before I bumped into them:
1. James Worthy (to be fair he was probably all of 22-23 at that time).
You didn't run into Worthy right after the ill-fated pass to Gerald Henderson, did you?
Well, I know they kicked off at least one person Sam likes.
I already have my assumptions.
High chance of me being disappointed.
But when you have competitive people and loose knives, it was bound to happen.
Glad to see the Lakers stormed back (granted it's early).
Haha pretty much same quote my friend said last week when he saw her.
Oakland, where sports go to die.
Hm, when did Sun Yue start getting playing time? I must've missed that trend.
$5M plus $5M more in incentives.
http://tinyurl.com/76tlmr
Farmar, Odom, and Walton are all hurt.
Nice try, SF, but I don't care if the Lakers lose by 50 to the Warriors tonight. The Celtics still got beat by Von Wafer, the same guy that missed a dunk.
Ah, I love it!
Well, Smoltz is only going to be playing probably half the year. I think he is definitely worth the risk. The Red Sox have the depth to take these risks with their pitching.
No, they won't.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/9044754/Sources:-Hoffman-appears-headed-to-Milwaukee
It's really not a big deal, even if the Lakers lose to the Warriors tonight. They're pretty far ahead in the division standings. At worse they drop to a 3rd seed. Besides, this Lakers/Warriors thing isn't close to the Dodgers/Giants rivalry.
And as I say that Sasha hits a 3 to put the Lakers ahead :-)
Are oft injured pitchers the new market inefficiency?
I wouldn't wanna run into you in a dark alley, do you have gold gloves or a black belt?
Why I never ripped the Schmidt deal. Of course, after we found out that the team knew his shoulder was shot, I may rip on it now.
Brad Penny looked totally lost out there this year, I'm thinking he'll be a total bust this year but Smotlzy is fierce & very competitive from what I've read so I'm thinking he is a dark horse.
They might as well sign Sheets too and have "Team Comeback From Injury."
I hate the Giants and Sharks though quite a bit. 49rs aren't as high on my hate list because I never got a chance do develop real Raider loyalty because I was bit too young.
One, there is only one team for everyone in the area to root for.
Two, basketball is a real big deal in the Bay Area.
Three, the Lakers are a model franchise that wins, while the Warriors are the Warriors.
476 - Not that I want to listen to Rosenthal but I won't be upset if Hoffman signs with Milwaukee. Hoffman as a Dodger just would've felt icky. 4 million dollars can be better spent.
11:31pm: Ken Rosenthal says the Dodgers have pulled even and are now--according to sources--a little bit ahead.
11:37pm: Ken Rosenthal takes a power nap.
1:54am: Ken Rosenthal wakes with the cold sweats realizing Milwaukee and LA are dead even for Hoffman's services.
2:01am: Ken Rosenthal flips over his pillow, searching in vain for the perfect spot on which to lay his weary head.
2:15am: Ken Rosenthal mumbles in his sleep something about Milwaukee moving slightly into the lead again.
See. Screwing things up is what the Warriors do.
Eric Mangini hired Rob Ryan of the Raiders as his defensive coordinator. I guess Ryan knew what the writing on the wall was, and got out of dodge as soon as he could.
Why teams are poaching staff from the Raiders is beyond me.
are any words silent in that name?
200 "HELLS BELLS!!! THAT'S WHY!!!"
Probably tongue-in-cheek, but has nothing to d owith whether we should sign him or not.
211 "Because Hoffman is a ballplayer and Ned likes ballplayers."
Again, irrelevant to the arguement. Hoffman is a good "ballplayer" so I don't see why Ned shouldn't like him.
"If we sign Hoffman for anywhere near the amount the Rays signed Burrell I will cry."
Well it sounds like we offered him just a bit over 4 million, which is only 25% of Burrell's contract, so I doubt that will be the case. Although, really, they probably are near in value for our team. Burrell was worth 2.8 wins last season, and projections have him near that value again, maybe a bit less. Dodger Sims has Pierre worth 0.83 wins, next year, which I personally think is low, but we'll stick with that. That makes Burrell a two win upgrade over Pierre, plus a small amount for Pierre replacing a bench OF'er. But Hoffman is projected to be worth 1.75-1.95 wins if you look here at Fangraphs:
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/type-a-relievers
And would probably be replacing a near replacement level reliever in the bullpen (Elbert maybe? He's projected for 0.21 WAR). So he's probably around a 1.5 win upgrade for us. So, really, what's the difference between the two, 0.5 to 0.75 wins? Not much considering the howling Ned will get here if we do sign Hoffman.
221 "I gave the Dodgers some credit for letting Saito (5mils) & Beimel (4mils possible) go, thinking they'd apply that $9mils towards something useful (like a Pat Burrell, Abreu, etc). But if they throw most of it for 1yr of Trevor Hoffman, I have to question what they are thinking."
They saved 12 million on Andruw's restructure, so its unfair to call 4-5 million most of that, its not even half.
"Would there be a worse way to spend $6mils, than on an old closer?"
Sure, they could do what you suggested and sign Abreu. And yes, I'm saying I would sign Hoffman over Abreu, with equal contracts, which I'm sure many will think absurd but look at the numbers. Here's Abreu's wins above replacement the last 7 years:
2002: 7.2
2003: 6.2
2004: 5.8
2005: 4.0
2006: 3.3
2007: 2.2
2008: 1.1
Because of his horrific defense, Abreu isn't even an average player anymore. He is projected to be worth 1.46 wins above replacement next year, or only half the value of Hoffman (considering he'd replacing Pierre), yet he is likely to get a bigger contract! It's interesting that while Colletti is criticized heavily in this thread many here would make similiarly bad moves as Ned has.
247 "I have no doubt he'll be effective in 2009 but we don't need him."
Need is relative, we don't NEED him, but we don't NEED a starting pitcher either, its just more likely we'll win with them. But we should try to replace Saito's lost innings (and Beimel and Park's) with another reliever if we can, because it makes our team better. We didn't need those guys last year, but it certainly helped.
"It would be wasted money unless he's signed for two million or less and that is not going to happen."
I don't see how it could possibly be wasted if we get a good player. Maybe we overpay but its not a waste and 4 million is not overpaying at all, it's a bargain. Hoffman's fair market value is 8.5-9.5 million at his projections.
"As Joey says, it would be pointless to restructure A Jones contract to create some flexibility, and then blow that flexibility on Trevor Hoffman."
As noted earlier, the flexibility would not be nearly blown. But I just don't buy this point in general. Our payroll right now is 77 million. If we gave Hoffman 5M then we're at 82M. How on Earth could that keep us from getting Manny? We could give him 23M and still only be at 105M, leaving 10M or so for a starting pitcher. The only way this doesn't work is if payroll is dropping significantly, but frankly there's no reason to believe that other than fan speculation. Otherwise we should be able to still afford Manny and just about any FA starter left in this market (including my choice Pettitte).
Anyway, I just don't see much of an arguement against the signing as is. There will be at least one Dodger fan a bit disappointed if we don't get him. Oh, and apologies in advance for the length of this post. :)
1) I liked the first episode of Ken Burns Baseball. Yes, a bit heavy on the elegiac and tinkly sound track, but i really like the leisurely pace - time to get into things. It sure beats the frenetic pace of "Epic Moments" - breathless highlights of 5-second peaks: without buildup, they become meaningless. Lots of details of 19th-c baseball I had no idea of. If there were factual errors (?), I guess that's too bad.
2) If Bob is feeling content not to have MLB network due to his dislike of Ken Burns typified by short shrift to Cardinals 13 episodes from now, note the fact that the very next program after Ken Burns was 1946 World Series featuring the Cardinals beating the Red Sox. A bit too fast for me - just snippets, but nice ones of Stan Musial and esp. Enos Slaughter. Eat your heart out, Bob. They'll be doing all WS 1943-48 during January, including 1947 Dodgers vs. Yankees, first appearance of proto-Boys of Summer. I really hope they get eventually to 1941 - pre-Boys of Summer (though springtime of Pee Wee Reese): I want to see Pete Reiser. In the first-day nearly complete 1956 WS, I really liked seeing the grace of Duke Snider, though he didn't quite make it on that occasion. MLB network is a Good Thing.
3) Top Chef OK. Much better on DVR without the 150 ads. Glad they got rid of Eugene, very annoying guy.
Career saves leader Trevor Hoffman is closing in on a deal with the Brewers.
Well it sounds like we offered him just a bit over 4 million, which is only 25% of Burrell's contract, so I doubt that will be the case.
I suspect that person was referring to Burrell's per/year salary ($8M) and not the entire two-year contract.
But can he cook scallops?
Funny, I was thinking of watching that show. I guess I will put that off.
Very nice! That excellent post just took point/counterpoint to whole new level.
I sort of like Testees on FX, but I have a warped sense of humor.
Thanks a lot Jon. This may sound silly, but being a college student who kind of aspires to write, that's pretty much an honor coming from you, even if you weren't exactly talking about what I wrote.
Although it sounds as though my post will be for naught, assuming 514 is correct. Kind of have to laugh at the timing. Too bad.
By the way, I'm warming to your idea of Pettitte instead of Sheets, despite what I wrote last week.
On which side of the pro/con T-chart with Time Warner does this transgression fall?
520 Thanks.
522 http://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Wins_Above_Replacement_Player
If their batting numbers are bad, then they are probably good fielders and play a premium defensive position because there are penalties depending on position.
I don't know. Time Warner recently changed its software on its DVR to "improve" it. It is an unusual use of the word "improve" as its performance is worse. It often doesn't pick the correct shows to tape. The old software never messed up.
Just hope Ned doesn't panic and sign Juan Cruz. That would ruin the entire offseason.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/2009/01/pete-carroll-pr.html
Nah, it was funnier that way.
527
Nice, coming over to the light side of the force. :)
528
That's actually pretty hilarious. I've never had that happen before.
I had a similar software "upgrade" in the last few months, and I lost some of the functionality in recording items. I also lost the guide ability to search for keywords in the description of shows.
Not a big fan.
And Norton got a promotion (to assistant head coach) too. Sweet.
I came close to switching to AT&T U-Verse a few months back, but I decided I couldn't live without the MLB Extra Innings package. I didn't want to watch games on my computer, so that killed the deal for me.
The bench is thin without Odom and Walton. The two guys who didn't play were Mihm & Mbenga (I don't think that was enough of a spoiler).
No, not a spoiler, thanks. I didn't even know Odom was out (haven't been following closely lately), what happened? Right now the Lakers are blowing their big lead and I'm being subjected to Jim Barnett, the Warriors color commentator, a truly awful announcer if you ask me. This is not entertaining.
I have met Jim Barnett on several occasions. At the movies, at the game, at a bar, he is a nice guy.
Bone bruise suffered trying to help on Chris Paul last night. Timetable for Odom's return is unknown. Could be days, could be weeks. I'd link to the LA Times article, but there are sidebar references to tonight's result.
We are homers, but not as bad as we used to be.
Oh nothing against him personally, I just don't think he is very good at his job. You're right though, he doesn't seem quite as homerish. Still, I find the Warriors guys near as bad as the D-backs announcers, which is to say, mute worthy.
I actually kind of like Kruk and Kuip though. For some reason they're homerism is more entertaining.
543
Ah, I see. Yeah, I didn't check because i figured I would see the score.
Dodgers are playing the Manny Ramirez game perfectly
http://tinyurl.com/9jhf9b
I have to admit, though: I love it when actors like William Hurt and Ted Danson reach this age, when every performance is sheer hambonery.
I guess I will have to watch and judge for myself, but when people say it is equal to a network show, I take that as a bad sign. Rose Byrne is the number one reason why I want to check the show out.
551
I do not read what he writes. A diseased retarded squirrel can find a nut every now and then.
Very good news for our draft pick! They'd give us a much better 2nd rounder than the Mets.
last night. Thought that was pretty cool.
That settles it: Hoffman's a Dodger.
Time to swoop in at the last minute and steal him away! {cackle}
Or not.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.