Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
This thread is for non-fan fiction chat.
To participate in today's group fan fiction, click this link.
Or they were just overrated
Break up the Cardinal!
The fan-fic has taken an unexpected turn. I move that a link to it be forwarded to Vin Scully when done.
That's wishful thinking.
Last week's Stanford upset has raised my interest in college football by at least 1 percent.
58° F
At Logan Airport
As of 6:55 PM
Dratted television networks and their desired schedules for baseball. Why can't at least weekend games be played during the day?
I can't believe a UNIVERSITIES team would be called the "Horned Frogs" I mean seriously, that's double intended to the max.
ps I had to google it just to make sure Bob T. wasn't joking.
Go figure.
Be careful what you wish for. It just may come true.
A. Jones - 100%
Schilling - 70 or 80% give or take
A-Rod - 10%
I just don't think the Dodgers have what it takes to get him. But in all fairness Boras will probably want WAY WAY WAY to much for the Ned Colletti to even take Boras'es demands seriously. A 12 year contract is just flat out wrong on principle alone.
of course he was, but I can see why Evans pulled the trigger (long swing) but if he figures it out (see Shawn Green long swing) he can be a pretty respectable forse for the Indians IF he figures it out
Roy Riegels can rest now. There is a new Cal goat.
Ohh, Sox could be headed for a 2+1 game.
And how come Drew seems to get a hit( usually a single), only after his team-mates show some offense.
Oh well. I've got a good 30 years left on this Earth. Surely Cal will finish #1 in one of them.
Matt Kemp & Ethier have respectable arms I guess your talking about Pierre, everybody knew he had a bad arm but I guess our brain trust didn't put that into account.
It's gonna be a long Sox game.
Now, I go back to rooting for UCLA next week. The Bruins have a chance at the Rose Bowl!
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3062658
Look at it this way.
ASU is down at halftime, so they could have a loss.
UCLA beats Cal next week and wins all of its remaining conference games except its finale against USC.
USC loses at Berkeley, but wins all the rest.
I believe UCLA would win any tiebreaker.
Now, if only UCLA had a guy who could play quarterback.
When it comes to Cal and UCLA, I'm strictly mercenary.
Since I hardly saw the Indians this year, it didn't cross my mind til the post-season but Colletti had what he needed in Lofton and let him go, in favor of spending a lot more for a worse player.
Aw, poor Gagne's gonna get the loss.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3062658
http://tinyurl.com/ysgdqt
>>
One storyline from the N.L. playoffs that keeps striking a chord with me is Troy Tulowitzki and the leadership role he has taken on in the Rockies clubhouse -- and the fact the Rockies' veterans have fallen in line behind him. Contrast that against Jeff Kent's rant back on Sept. 20 about how the Dodgers' young players ``don't get it.'' I have to wonder what would have happened if Tulo played for the Dodgers, and if he tried to take on a similar leadership role with them -- and how it would have been received by Kent/Gonzo/Nomar et al. Would it have been effective? Would others have fallen in line? Or would Tulo have been shamed into submission by the ages-old clubhouse heirarchy that at times this season seemed to be more important in the Dodgers clubhouse than winning was on the field.<<<
>> The schism between Jocketty and DeWitt epitomizes the debate in baseball that has raged with increasing passion and disagreement: the traditional method of building a club (scouting) versus the newer method of statistical analysis, the player procurement method popularized in the book "Moneyball."
In his book published last year, Schuerholz, who had been the longest-running general manager, wrote critically of the "Moneyball" concept.
"I was critical of the notion," Schuerholz said Friday, the day the Braves' changes were announced, "that someone writes that entirely in place of traditional, instinctive, experienced, intuitive scouting, there could be some metric model that could be as good as that." <<
http://tinyurl.com/2jx4ss
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.